Kivy installation python 2.7 windows 10 - python

I want to develop python 2.7 app using Kivy library on Windows 10, but I do not know how to install it. I have tried to install Cython,Pygame and then Kivy.But it did not work. I have reinstalled all these things like Cython,Kivy,Python... And now I want to install it from the beginning. How can I install Kivy?
Your answers will be very appreciated.

Kivy changed a little bit since 1.8.0, use the new instructions if you have pdf docs, or some kind of book. So... the default provider is sdl2 now(pygame isn't necessary). Also, there's no need for compiling since there are wheels, so even cython and mingw aren't necessary(if you don't code with them). The only thing you need is python installed correctly.
At first of all you should visit main page and especially documentation where is described quite well what is needed and what you should install, yet still someone comes with missing dlls or something, therefore read it carefully. Or grab a tool.
But really, use the docs, most of the stuff is documented either in docs or here(examples, problems,...). No one's going to read it for you. :)

Related

How to change python's "full name" (something like `cpython-34m-x86_64-linux-gnu`)?

I installed Python 3.5 from source and broke a number of modules on Python 3.4, which unfortunately, was an essential part of Ubuntu. I've been trying to fix the system, now I'm almost there, with (hopefully) the last problem: My Python 3.4 only recognize C modules with name *.cpython-34m.so, while all packages from Ubuntu repository are named *.cpython-34m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so. It seems that the cpython-34m stuff is the full name of Python, so I need to change it in accord with Ubuntu's expectation. How can I achieve this?
What you are trying makes no sense. The name cannot be changed, for a good reason. The reason the names are different is to prevent incompatible versions from mixing up each other. You can compile a different version with different options and then the name will be different, too.
The essence of the package management is to satisfy all dependencies through the repositories. Theoretically there should be no need to install anything from the sources.
If you need a different Python version for some specifical reasons, virtual environments would be the thing to look for:
http://docs.python-guide.org/en/latest/dev/virtualenvs/
I reinstalled Python 3.4 via Ubuntu package system, and suddenly everything worked fine. I still have no clue how Ubuntu customize its own Python, since Python's configure command has no related option at all. Anyway, it works, so why bother :P. Finally, thank you for helping me with this problem.

PySpeech Setup on Python 2.7

I've been thinking about installing the PySpeech module, but I'm not sure if it will work with Python 2.7.6. Also, I heard it needs PyWin32. Where would I get that, and how exactly do I install the modules?
Here (build 218) you can download pywin32. A simpe google search shows the page. alternative
If you are not sure whether it works then try it out. This is the only possibility to make sure that it works under your specific circumstances. Usually everyone makes everything work with Python 2.7 these days. But this does not include old packages.
Once you installed pip you can use pip install.
Have a look at the speech page. Try it out and report back.

Want to rework Python and add-ons for Mac OS X 10.7

I have been trying to graph with python for some time now. I want to use matplotlib, but have hit so many bumps in the road. Previously, numpy and matplotlib have been installed, but I am stuck with this error: ImportError: numpy.core.multiarray failed to import. I'm running Lion on Mac. I think I'm using Python 2.7. I have also tried full walkthroughs, such as this as well: http://penandpants.com/2012/02/24/install-python/. After several installation methods like pip and homebrew I am afraid that there's a lot of knotted things going on with python on my computer. And I really don't know how to untangle it.
I am reasonably knowledgeable with programming and algorithms, but I lack the know-how on how all the add-ons such as matplotlib that connect with python or how a text editor that can execute my code like Sublime Text 2 accesses them. So, as much as I would like to aid this asking-a-question process by letting you know what versions I am using, I don't really know how. Any guidance to how python connects to these things would be really appreciated :)
Ultimately, I wish to start from scratch with this whole mess, reinstalling python and then matplotlib from the ground up--but I'm not totally sure how. So, I guess my final question is how do I do that, or if that is just a wrong line of thinking how do I proceed if I want to graph some mathy things with python?
Sorry for the long winded question, I'll appreciate any help even a nudge in the right direction in learning how my computer organizes python on my computer!
Thanks!
I've had similar problems and the best solution I found was to use MacPorts for managing python and my installed modules. The things that I particularly like about using MacPorts for this are:
You can easily install multiple python versions (with modules separately installed for each installation)
You can select which python installation is the default (whether it is one installed by MacPorts or your OS X python installation).
Many MacPorts packages have optional variants so you can easily customize how they are installed (e.g., should numpy use the ATLAS library from MacPorts or from OS X) .
If you screw up your installation, you can easily wipe MacPorts from your system without worrying about breaking anything (almost everything installed by MacPorts is put under /opt).

PyGObject in Python 3 on windows

Does anyone know if its possible to install PyGObject/Gtk+3 on windows for Python 3? I have found installers on gnome's website for Python 2 (here), and several statements that it works with Python 3 (e.g. here), but no installer. The compilation instructions all seem to use jhbuild, which from what I can make out is a linux tool. Do I need to compile PyGObject to get it working, and if so, how? Or is there an easier way? What would be great is a guide or howto, but such a ting doesn't seem to exist.
Since this is the most rated question in the topic, I'd like to update the answer. Here is available installer for windows 32bit:
It contain complete SDK-like package. And complete libraries collection too. http://sourceforge.net/projects/pygobjectwin32/files/pygi-aio-3.10.2-win32_rev10-setup.exe/download
I searched for the same thing not so long ago. I couldn't really find much information but this other post
I ended up giving up on GTK+ and switch to xwpython which is really os independant
did you try the offical pypi page https://pygobject.readthedocs.io/en/latest/getting_started.html
I was able to install GTK

Recommendations for Python development on a Mac?

I bought a low-end MacBook about a month ago and am finally getting around to configuring it for Python. I've done most of my Python work in Windows up until now, and am finding the choices for OS X a little daunting. It looks like there are at least five options to use for Python development:
"Stock" Apple Python
MacPython
Fink
MacPorts
roll-your-own-from-source
I'm still primarily developing for 2.5, so the stock Python is fine from a functionality standpoint. What I want to know is: why should I choose one over the other?
Update:
To clarify, I am looking for a discussion of the various options, not links to the documentation. I've marked this as a Community Wiki question, as I don't feel there is a "correct" answer. Thanks to everyone who has already commented for their insight.
One advantage I see in using the "stock" Python that's included with Mac OS X is that it makes deployment to other Macs a piece of cake. I don't know what your deployment scenario is, but for me this is important. My code has to run on any number of Macs at work, and I try to minimize the amount of work it takes to run my code on all of those systems.
I would highly recommend using MacPorts with Porticus for managing your Python installation. It takes a while to build everything, but the advantage is that whatever you build yourself will be built against the same libraries, so you won't have to futz around with statically linked shared objects, etc. if you want your Python stuff to work with Apache, PostgreSQL, etc.
If you choose to go this way, remember to install the python_select port and use it to make your system use the Python installed from MacPorts.
As an added bonus, MacPorts has packages for most main-stream Python eggs, so if you should be able to have MacPorts keep you up-to-date with the latest versions of all that stuff :)
Here's some helpful info to get you started. http://www.python.org/download/mac/
Depends what you are using python for. If you are using MacOS funitionality and things like PyObjC you are probably best of with MacPython or the python provided by Apple.
I use Python on my Mac mostly for development of server side applications which later will run on FreeBSD & Linux boxes. For that I have used fink python for a few years and ever since MacPorts python. With mac ports it is simple to add required c modules (like database driver etc). It's also easy to keep two python Versions (2.5 & 2.6 in my case) around.
I used "compile your own" python to test pre-3.0 python but generally I find managing dependencies to c modules painfull if done by hand.
Thanks to easy_install installing pure python modules is fast and easy for all the options mentioned above.
I was never very much an IDE person. For development I use command line subversion installed by MacPorts, Textmate and occasionaly Expandrive do directly access files on servers. I personally are very dependent on Bicyclerepairman for Textmade to handle my refactoring needs.
Others seem to be very happy with Eclipse & Pydev.
How about EPD from Enthought? Yes, it's large but it is a framework build and includes things like wxPython, vtk, numpy, scipy, and ipython built-in.
I recommend using Python Virtual environments, especially if you use a Timecapsule because Timecapsule will back everything up, except modules you added to Python!
Based on the number of bugs and omissions people have been encountering in Leopard python (just here on SO!), I couldn't recommend that version. e.g., see:
Why do I get wrong results for hmac in Python but not Perl?
Problems on select module on Python 2.5
I would choose MacPorts.
It does not eliminate your existing python supplied by Apple since it installs by default in /opt/local/bin (plays nice with it) and plus it is easy to download and install additional python modules (even binary modules that you need to compile!). I use Porticus GUI to maintain my MacPorts installed list of packages, including python.
In my windows environment I use Eclipse and PyDev, which works quite well together, even if it's a bit sparse. Apparently the exact same environment is available for the Mac as well, so I suggest downloading Eclipse and using the internal update software function to update PyDev with the URL http://pydev.sourceforge.net/updates/. To look further into PyDev, look here.
Apple's supplied python is quite old – my tiger install has 2.3.5. This may not be a problem for you, but you would be missing out on a lot. Also, there is a risk that Apple will update it. I'm not sure if moving from 2.3.5 to (say) 2.4 would cause code to break, but I guess it's possible. This happened to perl people recently: http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/18/1435227
Macpython is a framework build (as is Apple's, I believe). To be honest, I'm not sure exactly what that means, but it's a prerequisite for some modules, in particular wxPython. If you get python from macports or fink, you will not be able to run wxPython (unless you run it through X11).
And guess what was forgotten by every answer here ... ActivePython.
No compilation required, even for third-party modules such as numpy, lxml, pyqt and thousands of others.
I recommend python (any python?) plus the ipython shell. My most recent experience with MacPython was MacPython 2.5, and I found IDLE frustrating to use as an editor. It's not very featureful, and its' very slow to scroll large quantities of output.

Categories

Resources