In Python 2, I want to write a Unicode character which integer value is k to text file.
How should I do that?
(For instance, with ASCII, if I want to write the character with value 65, in text file it should appeared as 'A').
Afterwards, how should I read the file back to integer value?
The last question, how many Unicode characters are there in total? (as I know, there are more than one Unicode alphabets, such as UTF-8, UTF-16, etc.)
Thanks a lot
You can't write Unicode code points to text files. They must be encoded. UTF-8, UTF-16 and UTF-32 are encodings that support the full range of Unicode code points. unichr() is the function to turn an integer into a Unicode codepoint. Note that Python 2 will default to an encoding that depends on your operating system if you don't specify one, but it won't be able to write all Unicode characters unless that default is one of the UTF encodings.
Create a Unicode character:
k = 65
u = unichr(k)
Write it to a file encoded in UTF-8:
import io
with io.open('output.txt','w',encoding='utf8') as f:
f.write(u)
ord() will convert a character back to an integer.
Example (make sure to open with the same encoding as written):
import io
with io.open('output.txt',encoding='utf8') as f:
u = f.read()
k = ord(u)
Unicode code points range from U+0000 to U+10FFFF. Not all code points are defined, but there are 1,114,112 possible values in that range.
Related
I try to write a "string" to a file and get the following error message:
UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\xcd' in position 6: ordinal not in range(128)
I tried the following methods:
print >>f, txt
print >>f, txt.decode('utf-8')
print >>f, txt.encode('utf-8')
None of them work. I have the same error message.
What is the idea behind encoding and decoding? If I have a unicode object can I write it to the file directly or I need to transform it to a string?
How can I find out what codding is used? How can I know if it is utf-8 or ascii or something else?
ADDED
I think I have just managed to save a string into a file. print >>f, txt as well as print >>f, txt.decode('utf-8') did not work but print >>f, txt.encode('utf-8') works. I get no error message and I see Chinese characters in my file.
I recently posted another answer that addresses this very issue. Key quote:
For a good overview of the difference, read one of Joel's articles, but the gist is that bytes are, well, bytes (groups of 8 bits without any further meaning attached), whereas characters are the things that make up strings of text. Encoding turns characters into bytes, and decoding turns bytes back into characters.
In Python 2, unicode objects are character strings. Regular str objects can be either character strings or byte strings. (Pro tip: use Python 3, it makes keeping track a lot easier.)
You should be passing character strings (not byte strings) to print, but you will need to be sure that those character strings can be encoded by the codec (such as ASCII or UTF-8) associated with the destination file object f. As part of the output process, Python encodes the string for you. If the string contains characters that cannot be encoded by the file object's codec, you will get errors like the one you're seeing.
Without knowing what is in your txt object I can't be more specific.
I think you need to use codecs library:
import codecs
file = codecs.open("test.txt", "w", "utf-8")
file.write(u'\xcd')
file.close()
Works fine.
The Story of Encoding/Decoding:
In the past, there were only about ~60 characters available in computers (including upper-case and lower-case letters + numbers + some special characters). So only 1 byte was enough to assign a unique number to each letter. Assigning numbers to letters for storing in memory is called encoding. This one byte encoding that is used in python by default is named ASCII.
With growth of computers in the world, we need to have more letters and characters in computer. So 1 byte is not enough. Different encoding schemes appeared. Unicode is one of the famous. The character that you are trying to store in your file is a Unicode character and it need 2 bytes, So you must explicitly indicate to Python that you don't want to use the default encoding, i.e. the ASCII (because you need 2 bytes for this character).
I have big data hex files from which I need to compare some hex values.When i read through python read it automatically converts it into ascii and so I have to decode it again.How can i directly read file in hex??
Till now i have tried using Intelhex python package but it is throwing an error :
intelhex.HexRecordError: Hex files contain invalid record.So is there any issues with my files only?
How much performance difference it is going to make if I successfully read hex data without decoding
split file into hex words consisting of purely [0-9a-fA-F] characters then int(word, 16) will change a word to a normal python integer. You can directly compare integers.
Alternatively you can keep the hex words and then convert an integer to a hex string using '{0:x}'.format(someinteger), prior to comparing the hex strings.
>>> s = open('input_file', 'rb').read(10)
>>> s
'\x00\x00\x00\x02\x00\xe6\x00\xa1I\x8d'
It is an ordinary sequence of bytes. If a byte is in ascii range then it is shown as the corresponding character in the representation e.g.,s[-2] == 'I'. The byte is the same (73 in decimal form), it is just shown in a human readable form.
You don't need to do any conversion to compare bytestrings (a[2:10] == b[4:12] works). Python does not decode your files to hex, ascii, or anything else unless you ask. Just make sure you open the files in binary mode (rb).
I have the following code to write an ASCII "#" character to a file in a binary fashion:
fin=open('a.bin','wb')
fin.write('\x40')
fin.close()
It turns out the a "#" character has been written to "a.bin", which has a length of 1-byte.
However, when I tried to write a unicode character instead:
fin=open('a.bin','wb')
fin.write(u'\x40')
fin.close()
It turned out that "a.bin" is still 1-byte long. I thought it should be 2-byte long since a unicode character takes 2-bytes. There may be some trivial thing that I overlooked.
You are confusing Unicode with encodings. An encoding is a standard that represents text as within the confines of individual values in the range of 0-255 (bytes), while Unicode is a standard that describes codepoints representing textual glyphs. The two are related but not the same thing.
The Unicode standard includes several encodings. UTF-16 is one such encoding that uses 2 bytes per codepoint, but it is not the only encoding included in the standard. UTF-8 is another such encoding, and it uses a variable number of bytes per codepoint.
Your file, however, is written using ASCII, the default codec used by Python 2 when you do not specify an explicit encoding. If you expected to see 2 bytes per codepoint, encode to UTF-16 explicitly:
fin.write(u'\x40'.encode('utf16-le')
This writes UTF-16 in little endian byte order; there is also a utf16-be codec. Normally, for multi-byte encodings like UTF-16 or UTF32, you'd also include a BOM, or Byte Order Mark; it is included automatically when you write UTF-16 without picking any endianes.
fin.write(u'\x40'.encode('utf16')
I strongly urge you to study up on Unicode, codecs and Python before you continue:
The Absolute Minimum Every Software Developer Absolutely, Positively Must Know About Unicode and Character Sets (No Excuses!) by Joel Spolsky
The Python Unicode HOWTO
Pragmatic Unicode by Ned Batchelder
Character numbers from U+0000 to U+007F (US-ASCII repertoire)
correspond to octets 00 to 7F (7 bit US-ASCII values). A direct
consequence is that a plain ASCII string is also a valid UTF-8
string.
UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646
Martijn is right in his elaborate answer: Learn more about Unicode first. But a smaller answer than reading large educational documents can be this:
When writing a Python unicode value (u'\x40' in your case) to a stream (an open file in your case), this abstract unicode value must be converted into a concrete stream of bytes. For this encodings are used.
You can do this explicitly (by using u'\x40'.encode('foo')) or you do it implicitly; then some encoding is being used. In your case either "ascii" or "utf8" which both represent a unicode-# as a single byte with value 40.
What you seem to want is using an encoding in which the unicode-# is represented as a two-byte value; that would be the encoding utf-16 for instance.
Working with Python 2.7, I'm wondering what real advantage there is in using the type unicode instead of str, as both of them seem to be able to hold Unicode strings. Is there any special reason apart from being able to set Unicode codes in unicode strings using the escape char \?:
Executing a module with:
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
a = 'á'
ua = u'á'
print a, ua
Results in: á, á
More testing using Python shell:
>>> a = 'á'
>>> a
'\xc3\xa1'
>>> ua = u'á'
>>> ua
u'\xe1'
>>> ua.encode('utf8')
'\xc3\xa1'
>>> ua.encode('latin1')
'\xe1'
>>> ua
u'\xe1'
So, the unicode string seems to be encoded using latin1 instead of utf-8 and the raw string is encoded using utf-8? I'm even more confused now! :S
unicode is meant to handle text. Text is a sequence of code points which may be bigger than a single byte. Text can be encoded in a specific encoding to represent the text as raw bytes(e.g. utf-8, latin-1...).
Note that unicode is not encoded! The internal representation used by python is an implementation detail, and you shouldn't care about it as long as it is able to represent the code points you want.
On the contrary str in Python 2 is a plain sequence of bytes. It does not represent text!
You can think of unicode as a general representation of some text, which can be encoded in many different ways into a sequence of binary data represented via str.
Note: In Python 3, unicode was renamed to str and there is a new bytes type for a plain sequence of bytes.
Some differences that you can see:
>>> len(u'à') # a single code point
1
>>> len('à') # by default utf-8 -> takes two bytes
2
>>> len(u'à'.encode('utf-8'))
2
>>> len(u'à'.encode('latin1')) # in latin1 it takes one byte
1
>>> print u'à'.encode('utf-8') # terminal encoding is utf-8
à
>>> print u'à'.encode('latin1') # it cannot understand the latin1 byte
�
Note that using str you have a lower-level control on the single bytes of a specific encoding representation, while using unicode you can only control at the code-point level. For example you can do:
>>> 'àèìòù'
'\xc3\xa0\xc3\xa8\xc3\xac\xc3\xb2\xc3\xb9'
>>> print 'àèìòù'.replace('\xa8', '')
à�ìòù
What before was valid UTF-8, isn't anymore. Using a unicode string you cannot operate in such a way that the resulting string isn't valid unicode text.
You can remove a code point, replace a code point with a different code point etc. but you cannot mess with the internal representation.
Unicode and encodings are completely different, unrelated things.
Unicode
Assigns a numeric ID to each character:
0x41 → A
0xE1 → á
0x414 → Д
So, Unicode assigns the number 0x41 to A, 0xE1 to á, and 0x414 to Д.
Even the little arrow → I used has its Unicode number, it's 0x2192. And even emojis have their Unicode numbers, 😂 is 0x1F602.
You can look up the Unicode numbers of all characters in this table. In particular, you can find the first three characters above here, the arrow here, and the emoji here.
These numbers assigned to all characters by Unicode are called code points.
The purpose of all this is to provide a means to unambiguously refer to a each character. For example, if I'm talking about 😂, instead of saying "you know, this laughing emoji with tears", I can just say, Unicode code point 0x1F602. Easier, right?
Note that Unicode code points are usually formatted with a leading U+, then the hexadecimal numeric value padded to at least 4 digits. So, the above examples would be U+0041, U+00E1, U+0414, U+2192, U+1F602.
Unicode code points range from U+0000 to U+10FFFF. That is 1,114,112 numbers. 2048 of these numbers are used for surrogates, thus, there remain 1,112,064. This means, Unicode can assign a unique ID (code point) to 1,112,064 distinct characters. Not all of these code points are assigned to a character yet, and Unicode is extended continuously (for example, when new emojis are introduced).
The important thing to remember is that all Unicode does is to assign a numerical ID, called code point, to each character for easy and unambiguous reference.
Encodings
Map characters to bit patterns.
These bit patterns are used to represent the characters in computer memory or on disk.
There are many different encodings that cover different subsets of characters. In the English-speaking world, the most common encodings are the following:
ASCII
Maps 128 characters (code points U+0000 to U+007F) to bit patterns of length 7.
Example:
a → 1100001 (0x61)
You can see all the mappings in this table.
ISO 8859-1 (aka Latin-1)
Maps 191 characters (code points U+0020 to U+007E and U+00A0 to U+00FF) to bit patterns of length 8.
Example:
a → 01100001 (0x61)
á → 11100001 (0xE1)
You can see all the mappings in this table.
UTF-8
Maps 1,112,064 characters (all existing Unicode code points) to bit patterns of either length 8, 16, 24, or 32 bits (that is, 1, 2, 3, or 4 bytes).
Example:
a → 01100001 (0x61)
á → 11000011 10100001 (0xC3 0xA1)
≠ → 11100010 10001001 10100000 (0xE2 0x89 0xA0)
😂 → 11110000 10011111 10011000 10000010 (0xF0 0x9F 0x98 0x82)
The way UTF-8 encodes characters to bit strings is very well described here.
Unicode and Encodings
Looking at the above examples, it becomes clear how Unicode is useful.
For example, if I'm Latin-1 and I want to explain my encoding of á, I don't need to say:
"I encode that a with an aigu (or however you call that rising bar) as 11100001"
But I can just say:
"I encode U+00E1 as 11100001"
And if I'm UTF-8, I can say:
"Me, in turn, I encode U+00E1 as 11000011 10100001"
And it's unambiguously clear to everybody which character we mean.
Now to the often arising confusion
It's true that sometimes the bit pattern of an encoding, if you interpret it as a binary number, is the same as the Unicode code point of this character.
For example:
ASCII encodes a as 1100001, which you can interpret as the hexadecimal number 0x61, and the Unicode code point of a is U+0061.
Latin-1 encodes á as 11100001, which you can interpret as the hexadecimal number 0xE1, and the Unicode code point of á is U+00E1.
Of course, this has been arranged like this on purpose for convenience. But you should look at it as a pure coincidence. The bit pattern used to represent a character in memory is not tied in any way to the Unicode code point of this character.
Nobody even says that you have to interpret a bit string like 11100001 as a binary number. Just look at it as the sequence of bits that Latin-1 uses to encode the character á.
Back to your question
The encoding used by your Python interpreter is UTF-8.
Here's what's going on in your examples:
Example 1
The following encodes the character á in UTF-8. This results in the bit string 11000011 10100001, which is saved in the variable a.
>>> a = 'á'
When you look at the value of a, its content 11000011 10100001 is formatted as the hex number 0xC3 0xA1 and output as '\xc3\xa1':
>>> a
'\xc3\xa1'
Example 2
The following saves the Unicode code point of á, which is U+00E1, in the variable ua (we don't know which data format Python uses internally to represent the code point U+00E1 in memory, and it's unimportant to us):
>>> ua = u'á'
When you look at the value of ua, Python tells you that it contains the code point U+00E1:
>>> ua
u'\xe1'
Example 3
The following encodes Unicode code point U+00E1 (representing character á) with UTF-8, which results in the bit pattern 11000011 10100001. Again, for output this bit pattern is represented as the hex number 0xC3 0xA1:
>>> ua.encode('utf-8')
'\xc3\xa1'
Example 4
The following encodes Unicode code point U+00E1 (representing character á) with Latin-1, which results in the bit pattern 11100001. For output, this bit pattern is represented as the hex number 0xE1, which by coincidence is the same as the initial code point U+00E1:
>>> ua.encode('latin1')
'\xe1'
There's no relation between the Unicode object ua and the Latin-1 encoding. That the code point of á is U+00E1 and the Latin-1 encoding of á is 0xE1 (if you interpret the bit pattern of the encoding as a binary number) is a pure coincidence.
Your terminal happens to be configured to UTF-8.
The fact that printing a works is a coincidence; you are writing raw UTF-8 bytes to the terminal. a is a value of length two, containing two bytes, hex values C3 and A1, while ua is a unicode value of length one, containing a codepoint U+00E1.
This difference in length is one major reason to use Unicode values; you cannot easily measure the number of text characters in a byte string; the len() of a byte string tells you how many bytes were used, not how many characters were encoded.
You can see the difference when you encode the unicode value to different output encodings:
>>> a = 'á'
>>> ua = u'á'
>>> ua.encode('utf8')
'\xc3\xa1'
>>> ua.encode('latin1')
'\xe1'
>>> a
'\xc3\xa1'
Note that the first 256 codepoints of the Unicode standard match the Latin 1 standard, so the U+00E1 codepoint is encoded to Latin 1 as a byte with hex value E1.
Furthermore, Python uses escape codes in representations of unicode and byte strings alike, and low code points that are not printable ASCII are represented using \x.. escape values as well. This is why a Unicode string with a code point between 128 and 255 looks just like the Latin 1 encoding. If you have a unicode string with codepoints beyond U+00FF a different escape sequence, \u.... is used instead, with a four-digit hex value.
It looks like you don't yet fully understand what the difference is between Unicode and an encoding. Please do read the following articles before you continue:
The Absolute Minimum Every Software Developer Absolutely, Positively Must Know About Unicode and Character Sets (No Excuses!) by Joel Spolsky
The Python Unicode HOWTO
Pragmatic Unicode by Ned Batchelder
When you define a as unicode, the chars a and á are equal. Otherwise á counts as two chars. Try len(a) and len(au). In addition to that, you may need to have the encoding when you work with other environments. For example if you use md5, you get different values for a and ua
I have a definition that builds a string composed of UTF-8 encoded characters. The output files are opened using 'w+', "utf-8" arguments.
However, when I try to x.write(string) I get the UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\ufeff' in position 1: ordinal not in range(128)
I assume this is because normally for example you would do `print(u'something'). But I need to use a variable and the quotations in u'_' negate that...
Any suggestions?
EDIT: Actual code here:
source = codecs.open("actionbreak/" + target + '.csv','r', "utf-8")
outTarget = codecs.open("actionbreak/" + newTarget, 'w+', "utf-8")
x = str(actionT(splitList[0], splitList[1]))
outTarget.write(x)
Essentially all this is supposed to be doing is building me a large amount of strings that look similar to this:
[日木曜 Deliverables]= CASE WHEN things = 11
THEN C ELSE 0 END
Are you using codecs.open()? Python 2.7's built-in open() does not support a specific encoding, meaning you have to manually encode non-ascii strings (as others have noted), but codecs.open() does support that and would probably be easier to drop in than manually encoding all the strings.
As you are actually using codecs.open(), going by your added code, and after a bit of looking things up myself, I suggest attempting to open the input and/or output file with encoding "utf-8-sig", which will automatically handle the BOM for UTF-8 (see http://docs.python.org/2/library/codecs.html#encodings-and-unicode, near the bottom of the section) I would think that would only matter for the input file, but if none of those combinations (utf-8-sig/utf-8, utf-8/utf-8-sig, utf-8-sig/utf-8-sig) work, then I believe the most likely situation would be that your input file is encoded in a different Unicode format with BOM, as Python's default UTF-8 codec interprets BOMs as regular characters so the input would not have an issue but output could.
Just noticed this, but... when you use codecs.open(), it expects a Unicode string, not an encoded one; try x = unicode(actionT(splitList[0], splitList[1])).
Your error can also occur when attempting to decode a unicode string (see http://wiki.python.org/moin/UnicodeEncodeError), but I don't think that should be happening unless actionT() or your list-splitting does something to the Unicode strings that causes them to be treated as non-Unicode strings.
In python 2.x there are two types of string: byte string and unicode string. First one contains bytes and last one - unicode code points. It is easy to determine, what type of string it is - unicode string starts with u:
# byte string
>>> 'abc'
'abc'
# unicode string:
>>> u'abc абв'
u'abc \u0430\u0431\u0432'
'abc' chars are the same, because the are in ASCII range. \u0430 is a unicode code point, it is out of ASCII range. "Code point" is python internal representation of unicode points, they can't be saved to file. It is needed to encode them to bytes first. Here how encoded unicode string looks like (as it is encoded, it becomes a byte string):
>>> s = u'abc абв'
>>> s.encode('utf8')
'abc \xd0\xb0\xd0\xb1\xd0\xb2'
This encoded string now can be written to file:
>>> s = u'abc абв'
>>> with open('text.txt', 'w+') as f:
... f.write(s.encode('utf8'))
Now, it is important to remember, what encoding we used when writing to file. Because to be able to read the data, we need to decode the content. Here what data looks like without decoding:
>>> with open('text.txt', 'r') as f:
... content = f.read()
>>> content
'abc \xd0\xb0\xd0\xb1\xd0\xb2'
You see, we've got encoded bytes, exactly the same as in s.encode('utf8'). To decode it is needed to provide coding name:
>>> content.decode('utf8')
u'abc \u0430\u0431\u0432'
After decode, we've got back our unicode string with unicode code points.
>>> print content.decode('utf8')
abc абв
xgord is right, but for further edification it's worth noting exactly what \ufeff means. It's known as a BOM or a byte order mark and basically it's a callback to the early days of unicode when people couldn't agree which way they wanted their unicode to go. Now all unicode documents are prefaced with either an \ufeff or an \uffef depending on which order they decide to arrange their bytes in.
If you hit an error on those characters in the first location you can be sure the issue is that you are not trying to decode it as utf-8, and the file is probably still fine.