This question already has answers here:
Is there a ceiling equivalent of // operator in Python?
(9 answers)
Closed 10 days ago.
I'm trying to divide number into groups in plain python without importing or the use of if-statements, and get the division into groups + remainder forming one extra group so that 200 / 99 would be 3, And 7 / 3 would be 3, but that 8 / 4 would still be just 2, and 4 / 2 would be 2 etc.. I cannot import anything so it needs to be in plain python.
I tried storing the numbers from inputs from user into variables and dividing them, and then adding one. I also tried // and adding 1 but I cannot get it to work.
How about this:
a, b = 200, 99
result, remainder = a // b + int(bool(a % b)), a % b
This computes the result by performing an integer divide a // b and computing the remainder a % b. Converting an integer value to a boolean is False for 0 and True for any other value, and converting that back to an integer gives you the value you want to add to the result. The remainder is computed again to assign it, if you need it.
As user #markransom commented, the conversion to int() isn't even necessary, as bool already 'is' an integer type:
>>> isinstance(True, int)
True
So, this works (although it may be considered a bit less readable):
a, b = 200, 99
result, remainder = a // b + bool(a % b), a % b
If you're using a modern version of Python and really want it to be short, this also works:
result = a // b + bool(remainder := a % b)
This uses the walrus operator to assign the remainder when it is first computed, avoiding having to compute it twice as well.
Python boolean operations short-circuit and return the last value evaluated and you can use that to convert a non-zero remainder to 1 for addition to a quotient
def group_me(dividend, divisor):
quotient, remainder = divmod(dividend, divisor)
return quotient + (remainder and 1 or 0)
print(group_me(200, 99))
print(group_me(7, 3))
print(group_me(8, 4))
Output
3
3
2
If remainder is non-zero, remainder and 1 short-circuits and returns 1. Otherwise, the or now becomes 0 or 0, which retains its last value 0.
You could do an if statement mathematically without using if itself:
n, d = 200, 99
x, y = n/d, n//d + 1
result = int((x%1 == 0) * x + (x%1 != 0) * y)
Essentially it is condition * answer 1 + (1 - condition) * answer 2. Then it switch to whichever answer depending on condition being 1 or 0.
This question already has answers here:
Is floating point math broken?
(31 answers)
Closed 2 years ago.
According to the x value entered using the formula below
Write the code of the program that calculates the value of y.
1
---------------
1
x + ----------
1
x + ------
1
x + ---
2
For example:
If x = 1, y = 0.6000000000000001
If x = 10 y = 0.09901951266867294
If x = 100 y = 0.009999000199950014
If x = -5 y = -0.19258202567760344
My code
x = float(input("x= "))
y = (1.0/(x+(1.0/(x+(1.0/(x+0.5))))))
print(y)
My result
x= 1 y= 0.625
x= 10 y= 0.09901914992993928
x= 100 y= 0.009999000199462694
x= -5 y= -0.19262295081967212
I don't know where i did wrong. Results are so close.
That's because not every number can be represented as floating-point. For example, 0.2 in decimal has finite numbers of digits, but in binary it has not (like 1/3 in decimal). To make very precise operations on floating-point variables, you can use decimal floating point, which works more like a decimal than binary.
Floating-point error:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating-point_error_mitigation
Decimal floating-point:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimal_floating_point
https://docs.python.org/2/library/decimal.html
in python the interpreter takes approximate for large numbers in (1/1.5) gives out 0.6666666... so add 1 and dividing 1 by it gives 0.6 then after adding 1 then dividing 1 by 1.6 aproximates to 0.625
Could someone help check why the result is always one and let me know what I did wrong? Thanks
Correct result should be: 1/1 + 1/2 + 1/3 == 1.83333333333.
x = int(input("Enter n: "))
assert x > 0, "n must be greater than zero!"
def one_over_n(x):
result = 0
for n in range(x):
n += 1
result += 1 / n
return result
r = one_over_n(x)
print("one_over_n( {0:d} ): {1:f}" .format(x, r))
It will work correctly on python 3, but not in python 2
>>> 1/2
0
That means you are just adding zeroes, to one. You will need to change either numerator or denominator to a float number e.g. 1/2.0, so change your code to
result += 1.0 / n
See Pep 238 to see why it was changed in python 3.
btw floating point numbers can't represent all fractions, so if you are just adding fractions, you can use Fraction class e.g.
>>> from fractions import Fraction as F
>>> F(1,1) + F(1,2) + F(1,3)
Fraction(11, 6)
As an alternative, to force Python 2 perform division as you expect (rather than integer division), add:
from __future__ import division
What does the % in a calculation? I can't seem to work out what it does.
Does it work out a percent of the calculation for example: 4 % 2 is apparently equal to 0. How?
The % (modulo) operator yields the remainder from the division of the first argument by the second. The numeric arguments are first converted to a common type. A zero right argument raises the ZeroDivisionError exception. The arguments may be floating point numbers, e.g., 3.14%0.7 equals 0.34 (since 3.14 equals 4*0.7 + 0.34.) The modulo operator always yields a result with the same sign as its second operand (or zero); the absolute value of the result is strictly smaller than the absolute value of the second operand [2].
Taken from http://docs.python.org/reference/expressions.html
Example 1:
6%2 evaluates to 0 because there's no remainder if 6 is divided by 2 ( 3 times ).
Example 2: 7%2 evaluates to 1 because there's a remainder of 1 when 7 is divided by 2 ( 3 times ).
So to summarise that, it returns the remainder of a division operation, or 0 if there is no remainder. So 6%2 means find the remainder of 6 divided by 2.
Somewhat off topic, the % is also used in string formatting operations like %= to substitute values into a string:
>>> x = 'abc_%(key)s_'
>>> x %= {'key':'value'}
>>> x
'abc_value_'
Again, off topic, but it seems to be a little documented feature which took me awhile to track down, and I thought it was related to Pythons modulo calculation for which this SO page ranks highly.
An expression like x % y evaluates to the remainder of x ÷ y - well, technically it is "modulus" instead of "reminder" so results may be different if you are comparing with other languages where % is the remainder operator. There are some subtle differences (if you are interested in the practical consequences see also "Why Python's Integer Division Floors" bellow).
Precedence is the same as operators / (division) and * (multiplication).
>>> 9 / 2
4
>>> 9 % 2
1
9 divided by 2 is equal to 4.
4 times 2 is 8
9 minus 8 is 1 - the remainder.
Python gotcha: depending on the Python version you are using, % is also the (deprecated) string interpolation operator, so watch out if you are coming from a language with automatic type casting (like PHP or JS) where an expression like '12' % 2 + 3 is legal: in Python it will result in TypeError: not all arguments converted during string formatting which probably will be pretty confusing for you.
[update for Python 3]
User n00p comments:
9/2 is 4.5 in python. You have to do integer division like so: 9//2 if you want python to tell you how many whole objects is left after division(4).
To be precise, integer division used to be the default in Python 2 (mind you, this answer is older than my boy who is already in school and at the time 2.x were mainstream):
$ python2.7
Python 2.7.10 (default, Oct 6 2017, 22:29:07)
[GCC 4.2.1 Compatible Apple LLVM 9.0.0 (clang-900.0.31)] on darwin
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> 9 / 2
4
>>> 9 // 2
4
>>> 9 % 2
1
In modern Python 9 / 2 results 4.5 indeed:
$ python3.6
Python 3.6.1 (default, Apr 27 2017, 00:15:59)
[GCC 4.2.1 Compatible Apple LLVM 8.1.0 (clang-802.0.42)] on darwin
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> 9 / 2
4.5
>>> 9 // 2
4
>>> 9 % 2
1
[update]
User dahiya_boy asked in the comment session:
Q. Can you please explain why -11 % 5 = 4 - dahiya_boy
This is weird, right? If you try this in JavaScript:
> -11 % 5
-1
This is because in JavaScript % is the "remainder" operator while in Python it is the "modulus" (clock math) operator.
You can get the explanation directly from GvR:
Edit - dahiya_boy
In Java and iOS -11 % 5 = -1 whereas in python and ruby -11 % 5 = 4.
Well half of the reason is explained by the Paulo Scardine, and rest of the explanation is below here
In Java and iOS, % gives the remainder that means if you divide 11 % 5 gives Quotient = 2 and remainder = 1 and -11 % 5 gives Quotient = -2 and remainder = -1.
Sample code in swift iOS.
But when we talk about in python its gives clock modulus. And its work with below formula
mod(a,n) = a - {n * Floor(a/n)}
Thats means,
mod(11,5) = 11 - {5 * Floor(11/5)} => 11 - {5 * 2}
So, mod(11,5) = 1
And
mod(-11,5) = -11 - 5 * Floor(-11/5) => -11 - {5 * (-3)}
So, mod(-11,5) = 4
Sample code in python 3.0.
Why Python's Integer Division Floors
I was asked (again) today to explain why integer division in Python returns the floor of the result instead of truncating towards zero like C.
For positive numbers, there's no surprise:
>>> 5//2
2
But if one of the operands is negative, the result is floored, i.e., rounded away from zero (towards negative infinity):
>>> -5//2
-3
>>> 5//-2
-3
This disturbs some people, but there is a good mathematical reason. The integer division operation (//) and its sibling, the modulo operation (%), go together and satisfy a nice mathematical relationship (all variables are integers):
a/b = q with remainder r
such that
b*q + r = a and 0 <= r < b
(assuming a and b are >= 0).
If you want the relationship to extend for negative a (keeping b positive), you have two choices: if you truncate q towards zero, r will become negative, so that the invariant changes to 0 <= abs(r) < otherwise, you can floor q towards negative infinity, and the invariant remains 0 <= r < b. [update: fixed this para]
In mathematical number theory, mathematicians always prefer the latter choice (see e.g. Wikipedia). For Python, I made the same choice because there are some interesting applications of the modulo operation where the sign of a is uninteresting. Consider taking a POSIX timestamp (seconds since the start of 1970) and turning it into the time of day. Since there are 24*3600 = 86400 seconds in a day, this calculation is simply t % 86400. But if we were to express times before 1970 using negative numbers, the "truncate towards zero" rule would give a meaningless result! Using the floor rule it all works out fine.
Other applications I've thought of are computations of pixel positions in computer graphics. I'm sure there are more.
For negative b, by the way, everything just flips, and the invariant becomes:
0 >= r > b.
So why doesn't C do it this way? Probably the hardware didn't do this at the time C was designed. And the hardware probably didn't do it this way because in the oldest hardware, negative numbers were represented as "sign + magnitude" rather than the two's complement representation used these days (at least for integers). My first computer was a Control Data mainframe and it used one's complement for integers as well as floats. A pattern of 60 ones meant negative zero!
Tim Peters, who knows where all Python's floating point skeletons are buried, has expressed some worry about my desire to extend these rules to floating point modulo. He's probably right; the truncate-towards-negative-infinity rule can cause precision loss for x%1.0 when x is a very small negative number. But that's not enough for me to break integer modulo, and // is tightly coupled to that.
PS. Note that I am using // instead of / -- this is Python 3 syntax, and also allowed in Python 2 to emphasize that you know you are invoking integer division. The / operator in Python 2 is ambiguous, since it returns a different result for two integer operands than for an int and a float or two floats. But that's a totally separate story; see PEP 238.
Posted by Guido van Rossum at 9:49 AM
The modulus is a mathematical operation, sometimes described as "clock arithmetic." I find that describing it as simply a remainder is misleading and confusing because it masks the real reason it is used so much in computer science. It really is used to wrap around cycles.
Think of a clock: Suppose you look at a clock in "military" time, where the range of times goes from 0:00 - 23.59. Now if you wanted something to happen every day at midnight, you would want the current time mod 24 to be zero:
if (hour % 24 == 0):
You can think of all hours in history wrapping around a circle of 24 hours over and over and the current hour of the day is that infinitely long number mod 24. It is a much more profound concept than just a remainder, it is a mathematical way to deal with cycles and it is very important in computer science. It is also used to wrap around arrays, allowing you to increase the index and use the modulus to wrap back to the beginning after you reach the end of the array.
Python - Basic Operators
http://www.tutorialspoint.com/python/python_basic_operators.htm
Modulus - Divides left hand operand by right hand operand and returns remainder
a = 10 and b = 20
b % a = 0
In most languages % is used for modulus. Python is no exception.
% Modulo operator can be also used for printing strings (Just like in C) as defined on Google https://developers.google.com/edu/python/strings.
# % operator
text = "%d little pigs come out or I'll %s and %s and %s" % (3, 'huff', 'puff', 'blow down')
This seems to bit off topic but It will certainly help someone.
Also, there is a useful built-in function called divmod:
divmod(a, b)
Take two (non complex) numbers as arguments and return a pair of numbers
consisting of their quotient and
remainder when using long division.
x % y calculates the remainder of the division x divided by y where the quotient is an integer. The remainder has the sign of y.
On Python 3 the calculation yields 6.75; this is because the / does a true division, not integer division like (by default) on Python 2. On Python 2 1 / 4 gives 0, as the result is rounded down.
The integer division can be done on Python 3 too, with // operator, thus to get the 7 as a result, you can execute:
3 + 2 + 1 - 5 + 4 % 2 - 1 // 4 + 6
Also, you can get the Python style division on Python 2, by just adding the line
from __future__ import division
as the first source code line in each source file.
Modulus operator, it is used for remainder division on integers, typically, but in Python can be used for floating point numbers.
http://docs.python.org/reference/expressions.html
The % (modulo) operator yields the remainder from the division of the first argument by the second. The numeric arguments are first converted to a common type. A zero right argument raises the ZeroDivisionError exception. The arguments may be floating point numbers, e.g., 3.14%0.7 equals 0.34 (since 3.14 equals 4*0.7 + 0.34.) The modulo operator always yields a result with the same sign as its second operand (or zero); the absolute value of the result is strictly smaller than the absolute value of the second operand [2].
It's a modulo operation, except when it's an old-fashioned C-style string formatting operator, not a modulo operation. See here for details. You'll see a lot of this in existing code.
It was hard for me to readily find specific use cases for the use of % online ,e.g. why does doing fractional modulus division or negative modulus division result in the answer that it does. Hope this helps clarify questions like this:
Modulus Division In General:
Modulus division returns the remainder of a mathematical division operation. It is does it as follows:
Say we have a dividend of 5 and divisor of 2, the following division operation would be (equated to x):
dividend = 5
divisor = 2
x = 5/2
The first step in the modulus calculation is to conduct integer division:
x_int = 5 // 2 ( integer division in python uses double slash)
x_int = 2
Next, the output of x_int is multiplied by the divisor:
x_mult = x_int * divisor
x_mult = 4
Lastly, the dividend is subtracted from the x_mult
dividend - x_mult = 1
The modulus operation ,therefore, returns 1:
5 % 2 = 1
Application to apply the modulus to a fraction
Example: 2 % 5
The calculation of the modulus when applied to a fraction is the same as above; however, it is important to note that the integer division will result in a value of zero when the divisor is larger than the dividend:
dividend = 2
divisor = 5
The integer division results in 0 whereas the; therefore, when step 3 above is performed, the value of the dividend is carried through (subtracted from zero):
dividend - 0 = 2 —> 2 % 5 = 2
Application to apply the modulus to a negative
Floor division occurs in which the value of the integer division is rounded down to the lowest integer value:
import math
x = -1.1
math.floor(-1.1) = -2
y = 1.1
math.floor = 1
Therefore, when you do integer division you may get a different outcome than you expect!
Applying the steps above on the following dividend and divisor illustrates the modulus concept:
dividend: -5
divisor: 2
Step 1: Apply integer division
x_int = -5 // 2 = -3
Step 2: Multiply the result of the integer division by the divisor
x_mult = x_int * 2 = -6
Step 3: Subtract the dividend from the multiplied variable, notice the double negative.
dividend - x_mult = -5 -(-6) = 1
Therefore:
-5 % 2 = 1
Be aware that
(3 +2 + 1 - 5) + (4 % 2) - (1/4) + 6
even with the brackets results in 6.75 instead of 7 if calculated in Python 3.4.
And the '/' operator is not that easy to understand, too (python2.7): try...
- 1/4
1 - 1/4
This is a bit off-topic here, but should be considered when evaluating the above expression :)
The % (modulo) operator yields the remainder from the division of the first argument by the second. The numeric arguments are first converted to a common type.
3 + 2 + 1 - 5 + 4 % 2 - 1 / 4 + 6 = 7
This is based on operator precedence.
% is modulo. 3 % 2 = 1, 4 % 2 = 0
/ is (an integer in this case) division, so:
3 + 2 + 1 - 5 + 4 % 2 - 1 / 4 + 6
1 + 4%2 - 1/4 + 6
1 + 0 - 0 + 6
7
It's a modulo operation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modulo_operation
http://docs.python.org/reference/expressions.html
So with order of operations, that works out to
(3+2+1-5) + (4%2) - (1/4) + 6
(1) + (0) - (0) + 6
7
The 1/4=0 because we're doing integer math here.
It is, as in many C-like languages, the remainder or modulo operation. See the documentation for numeric types — int, float, long, complex.
Modulus - Divides left hand operand by right hand operand and returns remainder.
If it helps:
1:0> 2%6
=> 2
2:0> 8%6
=> 2
3:0> 2%6 == 8%6
=> true
... and so on.
I have found that the easiest way to grasp the modulus operator (%) is through long division. It is the remainder and can be useful in determining a number to be even or odd:
4%2 = 0
2
2|4
-4
0
11%3 = 2
3
3|11
-9
2
def absolute(c):
if c>=0:
return c
else:
return c*-1
x=int(input("Enter the value:"))
a=absolute(x)
print(a)
The python 2.6 docs state that x % y is defined as the remainder of x / y (http://docs.python.org/library/stdtypes.html#numeric-types-int-float-long-complex). I am not clear on what is really occurring though, as:
for i in range(2, 11):
print 1.0 % i
prints "1.0" ten times, rather than "0.5, 0.333333, 0.25" etc. as I expected (1/2 = 0.5, etc).
Modulo is performed in the integer context, not fractional (remainders are integers). Therefore:
1 % 1 = 0 (1 times 1 plus 0)
1 % 2 = 1 (2 times 0 plus 1)
1 % 3 = 1 (3 times 0 plus 1)
6 % 3 = 0 (3 times 2 plus 0)
7 % 3 = 1 (3 times 2 plus 1)
8 % 3 = 2 (3 times 2 plus 2)
etc
How do I get the actual remainder of x / y?
By that I presume you mean doing a regular floating point division?
for i in range(2, 11):
print 1.0 / i
I think you can get the result you want by doing something like this:
for i in range(2, 11):
print 1.0*(1 % i) / i
This computes the (integer) remainder as explained by others. Then you divide by the denominator again, to produce the fractional part of the quotient.
Note that I multiply the result of the modulo operation by 1.0 to ensure that a floating point division operation is done (rather than integer division, which will result in 0).
You've confused division and modulus.
"0.5, 0.333333, 0.25" etc. as I expected (1/2 = 0.5, etc)."
That's the result of division.
Not modulus.
Modulus (%) is the remainder left over after integer division.
Your sample values are simple division, which is the / operator. Not the % operator.
Wouldn't dividing 1 by an number larger than it result in 0 with remainder 1?
The number theorists in the crowd may correct me, but I think modulus/remainder is defined only on integers.
We can have 2 types of division, that we can define through the return types:
Float: a/b. For example: 3/2=1.5
def division(a,b):
return a/b
Int: a//b and a%b. For example: 3//2=1 and 3%2=1
def quotient(a,b):
return a//b
def remainder(a,b):
return a%b