Related
I have two Data Frames:
DataFrame 1
df1 = pd.DataFrame()
df1["ID1"] = [np.nan, 1, np.nan, 3]
df1["ID2"] =[np.nan, np.nan , 2, 3]
df1
DataFrame 2
df2 = pd.DataFrame()
df2["ID"] = [1, 2, 3, 4]
df2
And I need to merge these two DataFrames using below conditions:
If in df1 ID1 == ID2 then I can merge df1 with df2 using df1.ID1 = df2.ID or df1.ID2 = df2.ID
If in df1 ID1 != ID2 then I have to mergre df1 with df2 using both mentioned in point 1 conditions means: df1.ID1 = df2.ID and df1.ID2 = df2.ID
I have the command as above in points 1 and 2, nevertheless I totaly do not know how to write it in Python Pandas, any suggestions ?
if I understood correctly, this will fix your problem
df1 = pd.DataFrame()
df1["ID1"] = [np.nan, 1, np.nan, 3]
df1["ID2"] =[np.nan, np.nan , 2, 3]
df2 = pd.DataFrame()
df2["ID"] = [1, 2, 3, 4]
if df1["ID1"].equals(df1["ID2"]) == True:
pass #do your merging here
else:
df1["ID1"],df1["ID2"] = df2["ID"],df2["ID"]
df1
output:
ID1 ID2
0 1 1
1 2 2
2 3 3
3 4 4
I'm trying to figure out how to add multiple columns to pandas simultaneously with Pandas. I would like to do this in one step rather than multiple repeated steps.
import pandas as pd
df = {'col_1': [0, 1, 2, 3],
'col_2': [4, 5, 6, 7]}
df = pd.DataFrame(df)
df[[ 'column_new_1', 'column_new_2','column_new_3']] = [np.nan, 'dogs',3] # I thought this would work here...
I would have expected your syntax to work too. The problem arises because when you create new columns with the column-list syntax (df[[new1, new2]] = ...), pandas requires that the right hand side be a DataFrame (note that it doesn't actually matter if the columns of the DataFrame have the same names as the columns you are creating).
Your syntax works fine for assigning scalar values to existing columns, and pandas is also happy to assign scalar values to a new column using the single-column syntax (df[new1] = ...). So the solution is either to convert this into several single-column assignments, or create a suitable DataFrame for the right-hand side.
Here are several approaches that will work:
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
df = pd.DataFrame({
'col_1': [0, 1, 2, 3],
'col_2': [4, 5, 6, 7]
})
Then one of the following:
1) Three assignments in one, using list unpacking:
df['column_new_1'], df['column_new_2'], df['column_new_3'] = [np.nan, 'dogs', 3]
2) DataFrame conveniently expands a single row to match the index, so you can do this:
df[['column_new_1', 'column_new_2', 'column_new_3']] = pd.DataFrame([[np.nan, 'dogs', 3]], index=df.index)
3) Make a temporary data frame with new columns, then combine with the original data frame later:
df = pd.concat(
[
df,
pd.DataFrame(
[[np.nan, 'dogs', 3]],
index=df.index,
columns=['column_new_1', 'column_new_2', 'column_new_3']
)
], axis=1
)
4) Similar to the previous, but using join instead of concat (may be less efficient):
df = df.join(pd.DataFrame(
[[np.nan, 'dogs', 3]],
index=df.index,
columns=['column_new_1', 'column_new_2', 'column_new_3']
))
5) Using a dict is a more "natural" way to create the new data frame than the previous two, but the new columns will be sorted alphabetically (at least before Python 3.6 or 3.7):
df = df.join(pd.DataFrame(
{
'column_new_1': np.nan,
'column_new_2': 'dogs',
'column_new_3': 3
}, index=df.index
))
6) Use .assign() with multiple column arguments.
I like this variant on #zero's answer a lot, but like the previous one, the new columns will always be sorted alphabetically, at least with early versions of Python:
df = df.assign(column_new_1=np.nan, column_new_2='dogs', column_new_3=3)
7) This is interesting (based on https://stackoverflow.com/a/44951376/3830997), but I don't know when it would be worth the trouble:
new_cols = ['column_new_1', 'column_new_2', 'column_new_3']
new_vals = [np.nan, 'dogs', 3]
df = df.reindex(columns=df.columns.tolist() + new_cols) # add empty cols
df[new_cols] = new_vals # multi-column assignment works for existing cols
8) In the end it's hard to beat three separate assignments:
df['column_new_1'] = np.nan
df['column_new_2'] = 'dogs'
df['column_new_3'] = 3
Note: many of these options have already been covered in other answers: Add multiple columns to DataFrame and set them equal to an existing column, Is it possible to add several columns at once to a pandas DataFrame?, Add multiple empty columns to pandas DataFrame
You could use assign with a dict of column names and values.
In [1069]: df.assign(**{'col_new_1': np.nan, 'col2_new_2': 'dogs', 'col3_new_3': 3})
Out[1069]:
col_1 col_2 col2_new_2 col3_new_3 col_new_1
0 0 4 dogs 3 NaN
1 1 5 dogs 3 NaN
2 2 6 dogs 3 NaN
3 3 7 dogs 3 NaN
My goal when writing Pandas is to write efficient readable code that I can chain. I won't go into why I like chaining so much here, I expound on that in my book, Effective Pandas.
I often want to add new columns in a succinct manner that also allows me to chain. My general rule is that I update or create columns using the .assign method.
To answer your question, I would use the following code:
(df
.assign(column_new_1=np.nan,
column_new_2='dogs',
column_new_3=3
)
)
To go a little further. I often have a dataframe that has new columns that I want to add to my dataframe. Let's assume it looks like say... a dataframe with the three columns you want:
df2 = pd.DataFrame({'column_new_1': np.nan,
'column_new_2': 'dogs',
'column_new_3': 3},
index=df.index
)
In this case I would write the following code:
(df
.assign(**df2)
)
With the use of concat:
In [128]: df
Out[128]:
col_1 col_2
0 0 4
1 1 5
2 2 6
3 3 7
In [129]: pd.concat([df, pd.DataFrame(columns = [ 'column_new_1', 'column_new_2','column_new_3'])])
Out[129]:
col_1 col_2 column_new_1 column_new_2 column_new_3
0 0.0 4.0 NaN NaN NaN
1 1.0 5.0 NaN NaN NaN
2 2.0 6.0 NaN NaN NaN
3 3.0 7.0 NaN NaN NaN
Not very sure of what you wanted to do with [np.nan, 'dogs',3]. Maybe now set them as default values?
In [142]: df1 = pd.concat([df, pd.DataFrame(columns = [ 'column_new_1', 'column_new_2','column_new_3'])])
In [143]: df1[[ 'column_new_1', 'column_new_2','column_new_3']] = [np.nan, 'dogs', 3]
In [144]: df1
Out[144]:
col_1 col_2 column_new_1 column_new_2 column_new_3
0 0.0 4.0 NaN dogs 3
1 1.0 5.0 NaN dogs 3
2 2.0 6.0 NaN dogs 3
3 3.0 7.0 NaN dogs 3
Dictionary mapping with .assign():
This is the most readable and dynamic way to assign new column(s) with value(s) when working with many of them.
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
new_cols = ["column_new_1", "column_new_2", "column_new_3"]
new_vals = [np.nan, "dogs", 3]
# Map new columns as keys and new values as values
col_val_mapping = dict(zip(new_cols, new_vals))
# Unpack new column/new value pairs and assign them to the data frame
df = df.assign(**col_val_mapping)
If you're just trying to initialize the new column values to be empty as you either don't know what the values are going to be or you have many new columns.
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
new_cols = ["column_new_1", "column_new_2", "column_new_3"]
new_vals = [None for item in new_cols]
# Map new columns as keys and new values as values
col_val_mapping = dict(zip(new_cols, new_vals))
# Unpack new column/new value pairs and assign them to the data frame
df = df.assign(**col_val_mapping)
use of list comprehension, pd.DataFrame and pd.concat
pd.concat(
[
df,
pd.DataFrame(
[[np.nan, 'dogs', 3] for _ in range(df.shape[0])],
df.index, ['column_new_1', 'column_new_2','column_new_3']
)
], axis=1)
if adding a lot of missing columns (a, b, c ,....) with the same value, here 0, i did this:
new_cols = ["a", "b", "c" ]
df[new_cols] = pd.DataFrame([[0] * len(new_cols)], index=df.index)
It's based on the second variant of the accepted answer.
Just want to point out that option2 in #Matthias Fripp's answer
(2) I wouldn't necessarily expect DataFrame to work this way, but it does
df[['column_new_1', 'column_new_2', 'column_new_3']] = pd.DataFrame([[np.nan, 'dogs', 3]], index=df.index)
is already documented in pandas' own documentation
http://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/indexing.html#basics
You can pass a list of columns to [] to select columns in that order.
If a column is not contained in the DataFrame, an exception will be raised.
Multiple columns can also be set in this manner.
You may find this useful for applying a transform (in-place) to a subset of the columns.
You can use tuple unpacking:
df = pd.DataFrame({'col1': [1, 2], 'col2': [3, 4]})
df['col3'], df['col4'] = 'a', 10
Result:
col1 col2 col3 col4
0 1 3 a 10
1 2 4 a 10
If you just want to add empty new columns, reindex will do the job
df
col_1 col_2
0 0 4
1 1 5
2 2 6
3 3 7
df.reindex(list(df)+['column_new_1', 'column_new_2','column_new_3'], axis=1)
col_1 col_2 column_new_1 column_new_2 column_new_3
0 0 4 NaN NaN NaN
1 1 5 NaN NaN NaN
2 2 6 NaN NaN NaN
3 3 7 NaN NaN NaN
full code example
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
df = {'col_1': [0, 1, 2, 3],
'col_2': [4, 5, 6, 7]}
df = pd.DataFrame(df)
print('df',df, sep='\n')
print()
df=df.reindex(list(df)+['column_new_1', 'column_new_2','column_new_3'], axis=1)
print('''df.reindex(list(df)+['column_new_1', 'column_new_2','column_new_3'], axis=1)''',df, sep='\n')
otherwise go for zeros answer with assign
I am not comfortable using "Index" and so on...could come up as below
df.columns
Index(['A123', 'B123'], dtype='object')
df=pd.concat([df,pd.DataFrame(columns=list('CDE'))])
df.rename(columns={
'C':'C123',
'D':'D123',
'E':'E123'
},inplace=True)
df.columns
Index(['A123', 'B123', 'C123', 'D123', 'E123'], dtype='object')
You could instantiate the values from a dictionary if you wanted different values for each column & you don't mind making a dictionary on the line before.
>>> import pandas as pd
>>> import numpy as np
>>> df = pd.DataFrame({
'col_1': [0, 1, 2, 3],
'col_2': [4, 5, 6, 7]
})
>>> df
col_1 col_2
0 0 4
1 1 5
2 2 6
3 3 7
>>> cols = {
'column_new_1':np.nan,
'column_new_2':'dogs',
'column_new_3': 3
}
>>> df[list(cols)] = pd.DataFrame(data={k:[v]*len(df) for k,v in cols.items()})
>>> df
col_1 col_2 column_new_1 column_new_2 column_new_3
0 0 4 NaN dogs 3
1 1 5 NaN dogs 3
2 2 6 NaN dogs 3
3 3 7 NaN dogs 3
Not necessarily better than the accepted answer, but it's another approach not yet listed.
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame({
'col_1': [0, 1, 2, 3],
'col_2': [4, 5, 6, 7]
})
df['col_3'], df['col_4'] = [df.col_1]*2
>> df
col_1 col_2 col_3 col_4
0 4 0 0
1 5 1 1
2 6 2 2
3 7 3 3
I try to update a DataFrame
df1 = pd.DataFrame(data = {'A' : [1,2,3,4], 'B' : [5,6,7,8]})
by another DataFrame
df2 = pd.DataFrame(data = {'B' : [9, np.nan, 11, np.nan]}).
Now, my aim is to update df1 by df2 and overwrite all values (NaN values too) using
df1.update(df2)
In contrast with the common usage it's important to me to get the NaN values finally in df1.
But as far as I see the update returns
>>> df1
A B
0 1 9
1 2 6
2 3 11
3 4 8
Is there a way to get
>>> df1
A B
0 1 9
1 2 NaN
2 3 11
3 4 NaN
without building df1 manually?
I am late to the party but I was recently confronted to the same issue, i.e. trying to update a dataframe without ignoring NaN values like the Pandas built-in update method does.
For two dataframes sharing the same column names, a workaround would be to concatenate both dataframes and then remove duplicates, only keeping the last entry:
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
df1 = pd.DataFrame(data = {'A' : [1,2,3,4], 'B' : [5,6,7,8]})
df2 = pd.DataFrame(data = {'A' : [1,2,3,4], 'B' : [9, np.nan, 11, np.nan]})
frames = [df1, df2]
df_concatenated = pd.concat(frames)
df1=df_concatenated.loc[~df_concatenated.index.duplicated(keep='last')]
Depending on indexing, it might be necessary to sort the indices of the output dataframe:
df1=df1.sort_index()
To address you very specific example for which df2 does not have a column A, you could run:
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
df1 = pd.DataFrame(data = {'A' : [1,2,3,4], 'B' : [5,6,7,8]})
df2 = pd.DataFrame(data = {'B' : [9, np.nan, 11, np.nan]})
frames = [df1, df2]
df_concatenated = pd.concat(frames)
df1['B']=df_concatenated.loc[~df_concatenated.index.duplicated(keep='last')]['B']
It also works fine for me. You could perhaps use np.nan instead of 'nan'?
I guess you meant [9, np.nan, 11, np.nan], not string "nan".
If there is no mandatory to use update() then do df1.B = df2.B instead, so that the new df1.B will contain NaN.
DataFrame.update() only updates non-NA values. See docs
Approach 1: Drop all affected columns
I achieved this by dropping the new columns and joining the data from the replacement DataFrame:
df1 = df1.drop(columns=df2.columns).join(df2)
This tells Pandas to remove the columns from df1 that you're about to recreate using the values from df2. Note that the column order changes since the new columns are appended to the end.
Approach 2: Preserve column order
Loop over all columns in the replacement DataFrame, inserting affected columns in the target DataFrame in their original place after dropping the original. If the replacement DataFrame includes a column not in the target DataFrame, it will be appended to the end.
for col in df2.columns:
try:
col_pos = list(df1.columns).index(col)
df1.drop(columns=[col], inplace=True)
df1.insert(col_pos, col, df2[col])
except ValueError:
df1[col] = df2[col]
Caveat
With both of these approaches, if your indices do not match between df1 and df2, the missing indices from df2 will end up NaN in your output DataFrame:
df1 = pd.DataFrame(data = {'B' : [1,2,3,4,5], 'A' : [5,6,7,8,9]}) # Note the additional row
df2 = pd.DataFrame(data = {'B' : [9, np.nan, 11, np.nan]})
df1.update(df2)
Output:
>>> df1
B A
0 9.0 5
1 2.0 6
2 11.0 7
3 4.0 8
4 5.0 9
My version 1:
df1 = pd.DataFrame(data = {'A' : [1,2,3,4,5], 'B' : [5,6,7,8,9]})
df2 = pd.DataFrame(data = {'B' : [9, np.nan, 11, np.nan]})
df1 = df1.drop(columns=df2.columns).join(df2)
Output:
>>> df1
A B
0 5 9.0
1 6 NaN
2 7 11.0
3 8 NaN
4 9 NaN
My version 2:
df1 = pd.DataFrame(data = {'A' : [1,2,3,4,5], 'B' : [5,6,7,8,9]})
df2 = pd.DataFrame(data = {'B' : [9, np.nan, 11, np.nan]})
for col in df2.columns:
try:
col_pos = list(df1.columns).index(col)
df1.drop(columns=[col], inplace=True)
df1.insert(col_pos, col, df2[col])
except ValueError:
df1[col] = df2[col]
Output:
>>> df1
B A
0 9.0 5
1 NaN 6
2 11.0 7
3 NaN 8
4 NaN 9
A usable trick is to fill with a string like 'n/a', then replace 'n/a' with np.nan, and convert column type back to float
df1 = pd.DataFrame(data = {'A' : [1,2,3,4], 'B' : [5,6,7,8]})
df2 = pd.DataFrame(data = {'B' : [9, 'n/a', 11, 'n/a']})
df1.update(df2)
df1['B'] = df1['B'].replace({'n/a':np.nan})
df1['B'] = df1['B'].apply(pd.to_numeric, errors='coerce')
Some explanation about the type conversion: after the call to replace, the result is:
A B
0 1 9.0
1 2 NaN
2 3 11.0
3 4 NaN
This looks acceptable, but actually the type of column B has changed from float to object.
df1.dtypes
will give
A int64
B object
dtype: object
To set it back to float, you can use:
df1['B'] = df1['B'].apply(pd.to_numeric, errors='coerce')
And then, you shall have the expected result:
df1.dtypes
will give the expected type:
A int64
B float64
dtype: object
The pandas.DataFrame.update doesn't replace values by nan by default so to circumvent this:
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
df1 = pd.DataFrame(data = {'A' : [1,2,3,4], 'B' : [5,6,7,8]})
df2 = pd.DataFrame(data = {'B' : [9, np.nan, 11, np.nan]})
df2.replace(np.nan, 'NAN', inplace = True)
df1.update(df2)
df1.replace('NAN', np.nan, inplace = True)
I had no real good idea how to formulate a good header here.
The situation is that I have two data frames I want to merge:
df1 = pd.DataFrame([[1, 2], [1, 3], [4, 6]], columns=['A', 'ID'])
df2 = pd.DataFrame([[3, 2], [3, 3], [4, 6]], columns=['ID', 'values'])
so I do a:
pd.merge(df1, df2, on="ID", how="left")
which results in:
A ID values
0 1 2 NaN
1 1 3 2.0
2 1 3 3.0
3 4 6 NaN
What I would like though is that any combination of A and ID only appear once. If there were several ones, like in the example above, it should take the respective values and merge them into a list(?) of values. So the result should look like this:
A ID values
0 1 2 NaN
1 1 3 2.0, 3.0
2 4 6 NaN
I do not have the slightest idea how to approach this.
Once you've got your merged dataframe, you can groupby columns A and ID and then simply apply list to your values column to aggregate the results into a list for each group:
import pandas as pd
df1 = pd.DataFrame([[1, 2], [1, 3], [4, 6]], columns=['A', 'ID'])
df2 = pd.DataFrame([[3, 2], [3, 3], [4, 6]], columns=['ID', 'values'])
merged = pd.merge(df1, df2, on="ID", how="left") \
.groupby(['A', 'ID'])['values'] \
.apply(list) \
.reset_index()
print(merged)
prints:
A ID values
0 1 2 [nan]
1 1 3 [2.0, 3.0]
2 4 6 [nan]
You could use
merged = pd.merge(df1, df2, on="ID", how="left") \
.groupby(['A', 'ID'])['values'] \
.apply(list) \
.reset_index()
as in asongtoruin fine answer, but you might want to consider the case of only None as special (due to the merge), in which case you can use
>>> df['values'].groupby([df.A, df.ID]).apply(lambda g: [] if g.isnull().all() else list(g)).reset_index()
A ID values
0 1 2 []
1 1 3 [2.0, 3.0]
2 4 6 []
I've two pandas data frames that have some rows in common.
Suppose dataframe2 is a subset of dataframe1.
How can I get the rows of dataframe1 which are not in dataframe2?
df1 = pandas.DataFrame(data = {'col1' : [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], 'col2' : [10, 11, 12, 13, 14]})
df2 = pandas.DataFrame(data = {'col1' : [1, 2, 3], 'col2' : [10, 11, 12]})
df1
col1 col2
0 1 10
1 2 11
2 3 12
3 4 13
4 5 14
df2
col1 col2
0 1 10
1 2 11
2 3 12
Expected result:
col1 col2
3 4 13
4 5 14
The currently selected solution produces incorrect results. To correctly solve this problem, we can perform a left-join from df1 to df2, making sure to first get just the unique rows for df2.
First, we need to modify the original DataFrame to add the row with data [3, 10].
df1 = pd.DataFrame(data = {'col1' : [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 3],
'col2' : [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 10]})
df2 = pd.DataFrame(data = {'col1' : [1, 2, 3],
'col2' : [10, 11, 12]})
df1
col1 col2
0 1 10
1 2 11
2 3 12
3 4 13
4 5 14
5 3 10
df2
col1 col2
0 1 10
1 2 11
2 3 12
Perform a left-join, eliminating duplicates in df2 so that each row of df1 joins with exactly 1 row of df2. Use the parameter indicator to return an extra column indicating which table the row was from.
df_all = df1.merge(df2.drop_duplicates(), on=['col1','col2'],
how='left', indicator=True)
df_all
col1 col2 _merge
0 1 10 both
1 2 11 both
2 3 12 both
3 4 13 left_only
4 5 14 left_only
5 3 10 left_only
Create a boolean condition:
df_all['_merge'] == 'left_only'
0 False
1 False
2 False
3 True
4 True
5 True
Name: _merge, dtype: bool
Why other solutions are wrong
A few solutions make the same mistake - they only check that each value is independently in each column, not together in the same row. Adding the last row, which is unique but has the values from both columns from df2 exposes the mistake:
common = df1.merge(df2,on=['col1','col2'])
(~df1.col1.isin(common.col1))&(~df1.col2.isin(common.col2))
0 False
1 False
2 False
3 True
4 True
5 False
dtype: bool
This solution gets the same wrong result:
df1.isin(df2.to_dict('l')).all(1)
One method would be to store the result of an inner merge form both dfs, then we can simply select the rows when one column's values are not in this common:
In [119]:
common = df1.merge(df2,on=['col1','col2'])
print(common)
df1[(~df1.col1.isin(common.col1))&(~df1.col2.isin(common.col2))]
col1 col2
0 1 10
1 2 11
2 3 12
Out[119]:
col1 col2
3 4 13
4 5 14
EDIT
Another method as you've found is to use isin which will produce NaN rows which you can drop:
In [138]:
df1[~df1.isin(df2)].dropna()
Out[138]:
col1 col2
3 4 13
4 5 14
However if df2 does not start rows in the same manner then this won't work:
df2 = pd.DataFrame(data = {'col1' : [2, 3,4], 'col2' : [11, 12,13]})
will produce the entire df:
In [140]:
df1[~df1.isin(df2)].dropna()
Out[140]:
col1 col2
0 1 10
1 2 11
2 3 12
3 4 13
4 5 14
Assuming that the indexes are consistent in the dataframes (not taking into account the actual col values):
df1[~df1.index.isin(df2.index)]
As already hinted at, isin requires columns and indices to be the same for a match. If match should only be on row contents, one way to get the mask for filtering the rows present is to convert the rows to a (Multi)Index:
In [77]: df1 = pandas.DataFrame(data = {'col1' : [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 3], 'col2' : [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 10]})
In [78]: df2 = pandas.DataFrame(data = {'col1' : [1, 3, 4], 'col2' : [10, 12, 13]})
In [79]: df1.loc[~df1.set_index(list(df1.columns)).index.isin(df2.set_index(list(df2.columns)).index)]
Out[79]:
col1 col2
1 2 11
4 5 14
5 3 10
If index should be taken into account, set_index has keyword argument append to append columns to existing index. If columns do not line up, list(df.columns) can be replaced with column specifications to align the data.
pandas.MultiIndex.from_tuples(df<N>.to_records(index = False).tolist())
could alternatively be used to create the indices, though I doubt this is more efficient.
Suppose you have two dataframes, df_1 and df_2 having multiple fields(column_names) and you want to find the only those entries in df_1 that are not in df_2 on the basis of some fields(e.g. fields_x, fields_y), follow the following steps.
Step1.Add a column key1 and key2 to df_1 and df_2 respectively.
Step2.Merge the dataframes as shown below. field_x and field_y are our desired columns.
Step3.Select only those rows from df_1 where key1 is not equal to key2.
Step4.Drop key1 and key2.
This method will solve your problem and works fast even with big data sets. I have tried it for dataframes with more than 1,000,000 rows.
df_1['key1'] = 1
df_2['key2'] = 1
df_1 = pd.merge(df_1, df_2, on=['field_x', 'field_y'], how = 'left')
df_1 = df_1[~(df_1.key2 == df_1.key1)]
df_1 = df_1.drop(['key1','key2'], axis=1)
a bit late, but it might be worth checking the "indicator" parameter of pd.merge.
See this other question for an example:
Compare PandaS DataFrames and return rows that are missing from the first one
This is the best way to do it:
df = df1.drop_duplicates().merge(df2.drop_duplicates(), on=df2.columns.to_list(),
how='left', indicator=True)
df.loc[df._merge=='left_only',df.columns!='_merge']
Note that drop duplicated is used to minimize the comparisons. It would work without them as well. The best way is to compare the row contents themselves and not the index or one/two columns and same code can be used for other filters like 'both' and 'right_only' as well to achieve similar results. For this syntax dataframes can have any number of columns and even different indices. Only the columns should occur in both the dataframes.
Why this is the best way?
index.difference only works for unique index based comparisons
pandas.concat() coupled with drop_duplicated() is not ideal because it will also get rid of the rows which may be only in the dataframe you want to keep and are duplicated for valid reasons.
I think those answers containing merging are extremely slow. Therefore I would suggest another way of getting those rows which are different between the two dataframes:
df1 = pandas.DataFrame(data = {'col1' : [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], 'col2' : [10, 11, 12, 13, 14]})
df2 = pandas.DataFrame(data = {'col1' : [1, 2, 3], 'col2' : [10, 11, 12]})
DISCLAIMER: My solution works if you're interested in one specific column where the two dataframes differ. If you are interested only in those rows, where all columns are equal do not use this approach.
Let's say, col1 is a kind of ID, and you only want to get those rows, which are not contained in both dataframes:
ids_in_df2 = df2.col1.unique()
not_found_ids = df[~df['col1'].isin(ids_in_df2 )]
And that's it. You get a dataframe containing only those rows where col1 isn't appearent in both dataframes.
You can also concat df1, df2:
x = pd.concat([df1, df2])
and then remove all duplicates:
y = x.drop_duplicates(keep=False, inplace=False)
I have an easier way in 2 simple steps:
As the OP mentioned Suppose dataframe2 is a subset of dataframe1, columns in the 2 dataframes are the same,
df1 = pd.DataFrame(data = {'col1' : [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 3],
'col2' : [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 10]})
df2 = pd.DataFrame(data = {'col1' : [1, 2, 3],
'col2' : [10, 11, 12]})
### Step 1: just append the 2nd df at the end of the 1st df
df_both = df1.append(df2)
### Step 2: drop rows which contain duplicates, Drop all duplicates.
df_dif = df_both.drop_duplicates(keep=False)
## mission accompliched!
df_dif
Out[20]:
col1 col2
3 4 13
4 5 14
5 3 10
you can do it using isin(dict) method:
In [74]: df1[~df1.isin(df2.to_dict('l')).all(1)]
Out[74]:
col1 col2
3 4 13
4 5 14
Explanation:
In [75]: df2.to_dict('l')
Out[75]: {'col1': [1, 2, 3], 'col2': [10, 11, 12]}
In [76]: df1.isin(df2.to_dict('l'))
Out[76]:
col1 col2
0 True True
1 True True
2 True True
3 False False
4 False False
In [77]: df1.isin(df2.to_dict('l')).all(1)
Out[77]:
0 True
1 True
2 True
3 False
4 False
dtype: bool
Here is another way of solving this:
df1[~df1.index.isin(df1.merge(df2, how='inner', on=['col1', 'col2']).index)]
Or:
df1.loc[df1.index.difference(df1.merge(df2, how='inner', on=['col1', 'col2']).index)]
extract the dissimilar rows using the merge function
df = df1.merge(df2.drop_duplicates(), on=['col1','col2'],
how='left', indicator=True)
save the dissimilar rows in CSV
df[df['_merge'] == 'left_only'].to_csv('output.csv')
My way of doing this involves adding a new column that is unique to one dataframe and using this to choose whether to keep an entry
df2[col3] = 1
df1 = pd.merge(df_1, df_2, on=['field_x', 'field_y'], how = 'outer')
df1['Empt'].fillna(0, inplace=True)
This makes it so every entry in df1 has a code - 0 if it is unique to df1, 1 if it is in both dataFrames. You then use this to restrict to what you want
answer = nonuni[nonuni['Empt'] == 0]
How about this:
df1 = pandas.DataFrame(data = {'col1' : [1, 2, 3, 4, 5],
'col2' : [10, 11, 12, 13, 14]})
df2 = pandas.DataFrame(data = {'col1' : [1, 2, 3],
'col2' : [10, 11, 12]})
records_df2 = set([tuple(row) for row in df2.values])
in_df2_mask = np.array([tuple(row) in records_df2 for row in df1.values])
result = df1[~in_df2_mask]
Easier, simpler and elegant
uncommon_indices = np.setdiff1d(df1.index.values, df2.index.values)
new_df = df1.loc[uncommon_indices,:]
pd.concat([df1, df2]).drop_duplicates(keep=False) will concatenate the two DataFrames together, and then drop all the duplicates, keeping only the unique rows. By default it will keep the first occurrence of the duplicate, but setting keep=False will drop all the duplicates.
Keep in mind that if you need to compare the DataFrames with columns with different names, you will have to make sure the columns have the same name before concatenating the dataframes.
Also, if the dataframes have a different order of columns, it will also affect the final result.