Develop Reference

CSV: How to find name of the value from the list

I have a code that reads CSV file which has 3 columns: Zone, Number, and ARPU and I try to write a recommendation system that finds the best match for each value of ARPU from the list provided in the code (creates column "Suggested Plan"). Also, it finds the next greater value (creates column "Potential updated plan") and next lower value("Potential downgrade plan"):
tp_usp15 = 1500
tp_usp23 = 2300
tp_usp27 = 2700
list_usp = [tp_usp15,tp_usp23, tp_usp27]
tp_bsnspls_s = 600
tp_bsnspls_steel = 1300
tp_bsnspls_chrome = 1800
list_bsnspls = [tp_bsnspls_s,tp_bsnspls_steel,tp_bsnspls_chrome]
tp_bsnsrshn10 = 1000
tp_bsnsrshn15 = 1500
tp_bsnsrshn20 = 2000
list_bsnsrshn = [tp_bsnsrshn10,tp_bsnsrshn15,tp_bsnsrshn20]
#Common list#
common_list = list_usp + list_bsnspls + list_bsnsrshn
import pandas as pd
def get_plans(p):
best = min(common_list, key=lambda x : abs(x - p['ARPU']))
best_index = common_list.index(best) # get location of best in common_list
if best_index < len(common_list) - 1:
next_greater = common_list[best_index + 1]
else:
next_greater = best # already highest
if best_index > 0:
next_lower = common_list[best_index - 1]
else:
next_lower = best # already lowest
return best, next_greater, next_lower
`common_list = list_usp + list_bsnspls + list_bsnsrshn
common_list = sorted(common_list) # ensure it is sorted
df = pd.read_csv('root/test.csv')
df[['Suggested plan', 'Potential updated plan', 'Potential downgraded plan']] = df.apply(get_plans, axis=1, result_type="expand")
df.to_csv('Recommendation System.csv') `
It creates 3 additional columns and does the corresponding task (best match or closes value, next greater value, and next smaller value).The code works perfectly but as you can see each numeric value has its name
How to change the code to create additional columns with name next to new columns with numeric values?
For example, right now code produces:
Zone, Number, ARPU, Suggested plan, Potential Updated Plan, and Potential downgrade plan
!BUT! I need to create:
Zone, Number, ARPU, Suggested plan (numeric), Suggested plan (name), Potential Updated Plan(numeric), Potential Updated Plan(name), Potential downgrade plan (numeric),Potential downgrade plan(name)
Where columns with (name) will show the corresponding name to the value used in (numeric) columns. Thanks in advance, guys!
Photo examples:
Here is the starting CSV file.
Then, after executing the code I have this:
And I want to create additional columns with corresponding names of valuables. Example columns in in yellow

Retaining rows that have percent overlapping ranges in Pandas

I have a dataframe with the columns:
[id, range_start, range_stop, score]
If two rows have a range overlap by x percentage I retain the row with the higher score. However, I am confused how to pull out rows with no overlap to other ranges. I am using a nested loop and recursion to condense overlapping ranges into a new dataframe. However, this structure causes all rows to be retained when I am looking for the non overlapping rows.
## This is my function to recursively select the highest scoring overlapping regions
def overlap_retention(df_overlap, threshold, df_nonoverlap=None):
if df_nonoverlap != None:
df_nonoverlap = pd.DataFrame()
df_overlap = pd.DataFrame()
for index, row in x.iterrows():
rs = row['range_start']
re = row['range_end']
## Silly nested loop to compare ranges between all rows
for index2, row2 in x.drop(index).iterrows():
rs2 = row2['range_start']
re2 = row2['range_end']
readRegion=[*range(rs,re,1)]
refRegion=[*range(rs2,re2,1)]
regionUnion = set(readRegion).intersection(set(refRegion))
overlap_length = len(regionUnion)
overlap_min = min(rs, rs2)
overlap_max = max(re, re2)
overlap_full_range = overlap_max-overlap_min
overlap_percentage = (overlap_length/overlap_full_range)*100
## Check if they overlap by x_percentage and retain the higher score
if overlap_percentage>x_percentage:
evalue = row['score']
evalue_2 = row2['score']
if evalue_2 > evalue:
df_overlap = df_overlap.append(row2)
else:
df_overlap = df_overlap.append(row)
#----------------------------------------------------------
## How to find non-overlapping rows without pulling everything?
else:
df_nonoverlap = df_nonoverlap.append(row)
# ---------------------------------------------
### Recursion here to condense overlapped list further
if len(df_overlap)>1:
overlap_retention(df_overlap, threshold, df_nonoverlap)
else:
return(df_nonoverlap)
An example input is below:
data = {'id':['id1', 'id2', 'id3', 'id4', 'id5', 'id6'],
'range_start':[1,12,11,1,20, 10],
'range_end':[4,15,15,6,23,16],
'score':[3,1,8,2,5,1]}
input = pd.DataFrame(data, columns=['id', 'range_start', 'range_end', 'score'])
The desired output can change based on the overlap threshold. In the example above id1 and id4 may both be retained or simply id1 depending on the overlap threshold:
data = {'id':['id1', 'id3', 'id5'],
'range_start':[1,11,20],
'range_end':[4,15,23],
'score':[3,8,5]}
output = pd.DataFrame(data, columns=['id', 'range_start', 'range_end', 'score'])

You can make a cartesian join between all the ranges, then find length and % of the overlap for each pair, and filter it based on the x_overlap threshold.
After that, for each range we can find the overlapping range with the highest score (which could be the range itself, with the overlap of 100%):
# set min overlap parameter
x_overlap = 0.5
# cartesian join all ranges
z = df.assign(k=1).merge(
df.assign(k=1), on='k', suffixes=['_1', '_2'])
# find lengths of overlaps
z['len_overlap'] = (
z[['range_end_1', 'range_end_2']].min(axis=1) -
z[['range_start_1', 'range_start_2']].max(axis=1)).clip(0)
# we're only interested in cases where ranges overlap, so the total
# range is the range between min(start1, start2) and max(end1, end2)
z['len_total'] = (
z[['range_end_1', 'range_end_2']].max(axis=1) -
z[['range_start_1', 'range_start_2']].min(axis=1)).clip(0)
# find % overlap and filter out pairs above threshold
# these include 'pairs' where a range is paired to itself
z['pct_overlap'] = z['len_overlap'] / z['len_total']
z = z[z['pct_overlap'] > x_overlap]
# for each range find an overlapping range with the highest score
# (could be the range itself)
z = z.sort_values('score_2').groupby('id_1')['id_2'].last()
# filter the inputs
df_out = df[df['id'].isin(z)]
df_out
Output:
id range_start range_end score
0 id1 1 4 3
2 id3 11 15 8
4 id5 20 23 5
P.S. Please note that it is not very clear what should happen with id4 in your example. Since you don't have it in your output, I assumed (hopefully correctly) that you're not interested in zero-length ranges in the output
P.P.S. There is a new syntax for cartesian join in pandas 1.2.0+ with how=cross parameter in the merge method. I've used in my answer a version with a dummy variable k=1, which is more verbose, but compatible with older versions

I think you need a very clear definition of overlap. If you have [2;7], [6;10] and [7;8], which one overlaps with which one ?
Avoid using input as a variable name, it shadows the function input() (to get input from the user)
If you want to select clear overlaps (only the start or the end differs), and you only have at most ONE overlap, here you go:
sorted_df = df.sort_values(by=["range_start"])
starts_earlier = sorted_df[sorted_df.range_end.shift(-1) == sorted_df.range_end]
sorted_df = df.sort_values(by=["range_end"])
ends_earlier = sorted_df[sorted_df.range_start.shift(-1) == sorted_df.range_start]
Then you can do a df.drop(starts_earlier.index) and df.drop(ends_earlier.index) to remove the shorter ones/
df.shift() : https://pandas.pydata.org/docs/reference/api/pandas.DataFrame.shift.html
This code won't work for multiple overlapping segments. If you are interested in that, let me know.

Pandas- locate a value based on logical statements

I am using the this dataset for a project.
I am trying to find the total yield for each inverter for the 34 day duration of the dataset (basically use the final and initial value available for each inverter). I have been able to get the list of inverters using pd.unique()(there are 22 inverters for each solar power plant.
I am having trouble querying the total_yield data for each inverter.
Here is what I have tried:
def get_yields(arr: np.ndarray, df:pd.core.frame.DataFrame) -> np.ndarray:
delta = np.zeros(len(arr))
index =0
for i in arr:
initial = df.loc[df["DATE_TIME"]=="15-05-2020 02:00"]
initial = initial.loc[initial["INVERTER_ID"]==i]
initial.reset_index(inplace=True,drop=True)
initial = initial.at[0,"TOTAL_YIELD"]
final = df.loc[(df["DATE_TIME"]=="17-06-2020 23:45")]
final = final.loc[final["INVERTER_ID"]==i]
final.reset_index(inplace=True, drop=True)
final = final.at[0,"TOTAL_YIELD"]
delta[index] = final - initial
index = index + 1
return delta
Reference: arr is the array of inverters, listed below. df is the generation dataframe for each plant.
The problem is that not every inverter has a data point for each interval. This makes this function only work for the inverters at the first plant, not the second one.
My second approach was to filter by the inverter first, then take the first and last data points. But I get an error- 'Series' objects are mutable, thus they cannot be hashed
Here is the code for that so far:
def get_yields2(arr: np.ndarray, df: pd.core.frame.DataFrame) -> np.ndarry:
delta = np.zeros(len(arr))
index = 0
for i in arr:
initial = df.loc(df["INVERTER_ID"] == i)
index += 1
break
return delta
List of inverters at plant 1 for reference(labeled as SOURCE_KEY):
['1BY6WEcLGh8j5v7' '1IF53ai7Xc0U56Y' '3PZuoBAID5Wc2HD' '7JYdWkrLSPkdwr4'
'McdE0feGgRqW7Ca' 'VHMLBKoKgIrUVDU' 'WRmjgnKYAwPKWDb' 'ZnxXDlPa8U1GXgE'
'ZoEaEvLYb1n2sOq' 'adLQvlD726eNBSB' 'bvBOhCH3iADSZry' 'iCRJl6heRkivqQ3'
'ih0vzX44oOqAx2f' 'pkci93gMrogZuBj' 'rGa61gmuvPhdLxV' 'sjndEbLyjtCKgGv'
'uHbuxQJl8lW7ozc' 'wCURE6d3bPkepu2' 'z9Y9gH1T5YWrNuG' 'zBIq5rxdHJRwDNY'
'zVJPv84UY57bAof' 'YxYtjZvoooNbGkE']
List of inverters at plant 2:
['4UPUqMRk7TRMgml' '81aHJ1q11NBPMrL' '9kRcWv60rDACzjR' 'Et9kgGMDl729KT4'
'IQ2d7wF4YD8zU1Q' 'LYwnQax7tkwH5Cb' 'LlT2YUhhzqhg5Sw' 'Mx2yZCDsyf6DPfv'
'NgDl19wMapZy17u' 'PeE6FRyGXUgsRhN' 'Qf4GUc1pJu5T6c6' 'Quc1TzYxW2pYoWX'
'V94E5Ben1TlhnDV' 'WcxssY2VbP4hApt' 'mqwcsP2rE7J0TFp' 'oZ35aAeoifZaQzV'
'oZZkBaNadn6DNKz' 'q49J1IKaHRwDQnt' 'rrq4fwE8jgrTyWY' 'vOuJvMaM2sgwLmb'
'xMbIugepa2P7lBB' 'xoJJ8DcxJEcupym']
Thank you very much.

I can't download the dataset to test this. Getting "To May Requests" Error.
However, you should be able to do this with a groupby.
import pandas as pd
result = df.groupby('INVERTER_ID')['TOTAL_YIELD'].agg(['max','min'])
result['delta'] = result['max']-result['min']
print(result[['delta']])

So if I'm understanding this right, what you want is the TOTAL_YIELD for each inverter for the beginning of the time period starting 5-05-2020 02:00 and ending 17-06-2020 23:45. Try this:
# enumerate lets you have an index value along with iterating through the array
for i, code in enumerate(arr):
# to filter the info to between the two dates, but not necessarily assuming that
# each inverter's data starts and ends at each date
inverter_df = df.loc[df['DATE_TIME'] >= pd.to_datetime('15-05-2020 02:00:00')]
inverter_df = inverter_df.loc[inverter_df['DATE_TIME'] <= pd.to_datetime('17-06-2020
23:45:00')]
inverter_df = inverter_df.loc[inverter_df["INVERTER_ID"]==code]]
# sort by date
inverter_df.sort_values(by='DATE_TIME', inplace= True)
# grab TOTAL_YIELD at the first available date
initial = inverter_df['TOTAL_YIELD'].iloc[0]
# grab TOTAL_YIELD at the last available date
final = inverter_df['TOTAL_YIELD'].iloc[-1]
delta[index] = final - initial

Most efficient method to modify values within large dataframes - Python

Overview: I am working with pandas dataframes of census information, while they only have two columns, they are several hundred thousand rows in length. One column is a census block ID number and the other is a 'place' value, which is unique to the city in which that census block ID resides.
Example Data:
BLOCKID PLACEFP
0 60014001001000 53000
1 60014001001001 53000
...
5844 60014099004021 53000
5845 60014100001000
5846 60014100001001
5847 60014100001002 53000
Problem: As shown above, there are several place values that are blank, though they have a census block ID in their corresponding row. What I found was that in several instances, the census block ID that is missing a place value, is located within the same city as the surrounding blocks that do not have a missing place value, especially if the bookend place values are the same - as shown above, with index 5844 through 5847 - those two blocks are located within the same general area as the surrounding blocks, but just seem to be missing the place value.
Goal: I want to be able to go through this dataframe, find these instances and fill in the missing place value, based on the place value before the missing value and the place value that immediately follows.
Current State & Obstacle: I wrote a loop that goes through the dataframe to correct these issues, shown below.
current_state_blockid_df = pandas.DataFrame({'BLOCKID':[60014099004021,60014100001000,60014100001001,60014100001002,60014301012019,60014301013000,60014301013001,60014301013002,60014301013003,60014301013004,60014301013005,60014301013006],
'PLACEFP': [53000,,,53000,11964,'','','','','','',11964]})
for i in current_state_blockid_df.index:
if current_state_blockid_df.loc[i, 'PLACEFP'] == '':
#Get value before blank
prior_place_fp = current_state_blockid_df.loc[i - 1, 'PLACEFP']
next_place_fp = ''
_n = 1
# Find the end of the blank section
while next_place_fp == '':
next_place_fp = current_state_blockid_df.loc[i + _n, 'PLACEFP']
if next_place_fp == '':
_n += 1
# if the blanks could likely be in the same city, assign them the city's place value
if prior_place_fp == next_place_fp:
for _i in range(1, _n):
current_state_blockid_df.loc[_i, 'PLACEFP'] = prior_place_fp
However, as expected, it is very slow when dealing with hundreds of thousands or rows of data. I have considered using maybe ThreadPool executor to split up the work, but I haven't quite figured out the logic I'd use to get that done. One possibility to speed it up slightly, is to eliminate the check to see where the end of the gap is and instead just fill it in with whatever the previous place value was before the blanks. While that may end up being my goto, there's still a chance it's too slow and ideally I'd like it to only fill in if the before and after values match, eliminating the possibility of the block being mistakenly assigned. If someone has another suggestion as to how this could be achieved quickly, it would be very much appreciated.

You can use shift to help speed up the process. However, this doesn't solve for cases where there are multiple blanks in a row.
df['PLACEFP_PRIOR'] = df['PLACEFP'].shift(1)
df['PLACEFP_SUBS'] = df['PLACEFP'].shift(-1)
criteria1 = df['PLACEFP'].isnull()
criteria2 = df['PLACEFP_PRIOR'] == df['PLACEFP_AFTER']
df.loc[criteria1 & criteria2, 'PLACEFP'] = df.loc[criteria1 & criteria2, 'PLACEFP_PRIOR']
If you end up needing to iterate over the dataframe, use df.itertuples. You can access the column values in the row via dot notation (row.column_name).
for idx, row in df.itertuples():
# logic goes here

Using your dataframe as defined
def fix_df(current_state_blockid_df):
df_with_blanks = current_state_blockid_df[current_state_blockid_df['PLACEFP'] == '']
df_no_blanks = current_state_blockid_df[current_state_blockid_df['PLACEFP'] != '']
sections = {}
last_i = 0
grouping = []
for i in df_with_blanks.index:
if i - 1 == last_i:
grouping.append(i)
last_i = i
else:
last_i = i
if len(grouping) > 0:
sections[min(grouping)] = {'indexes': grouping}
grouping = []
grouping.append(i)
if len(grouping) > 0:
sections[min(grouping)] = {'indexes': grouping}
for i in sections.keys():
sections[i]['place'] = current_state_blockid_df.loc[i-1, 'PLACEFP']
l = []
for i in sections:
for x in sections[i]['indexes']:
l.append(sections[i]['place'])
df_with_blanks['PLACEFP'] = l
final_df = pandas.concat([df_with_blanks, df_no_blanks]).sort_index(axis=0)
return final_df
df = fix_df(current_state_blockid_df)
print(df)
Output:
BLOCKID PLACEFP
0 60014099004021 53000
1 60014100001000 53000
2 60014100001001 53000
3 60014100001002 53000
4 60014301012019 11964
5 60014301013000 11964
6 60014301013001 11964
7 60014301013002 11964
8 60014301013003 11964
9 60014301013004 11964
10 60014301013005 11964
11 60014301013006 11964

Pandas very slow query

I have the following code which reads a csv file and then analyzes it. One patient has more than one illness and I need to find how many times an illness is seen on all patients. But the query given here
raw_data[(raw_data['Finding Labels'].str.contains(ctr)) & (raw_data['Patient ID'] == i)].size
is so slow that it takes more than 15 mins. Is there a way to make the query faster?
raw_data = pd.read_csv(r'C:\Users\omer.kurular\Desktop\Data_Entry_2017.csv')
data = ["Cardiomegaly", "Emphysema", "Effusion", "No Finding", "Hernia", "Infiltration", "Mass", "Nodule", "Atelectasis", "Pneumothorax", "Pleural_Thickening", "Pneumonia", "Fibrosis", "Edema", "Consolidation"]
illnesses = pd.DataFrame({"Finding_Label":[],
"Count_of_Patientes_Having":[],
"Count_of_Times_Being_Shown_In_An_Image":[]})
ids = raw_data["Patient ID"].drop_duplicates()
index = 0
for ctr in data[:1]:
illnesses.at[index, "Finding_Label"] = ctr
illnesses.at[index, "Count_of_Times_Being_Shown_In_An_Image"] = raw_data[raw_data["Finding Labels"].str.contains(ctr)].size / 12
for i in ids:
illnesses.at[index, "Count_of_Patientes_Having"] = raw_data[(raw_data['Finding Labels'].str.contains(ctr)) & (raw_data['Patient ID'] == i)].size
index = index + 1
Part of dataframes:
Raw_data
Finding Labels - Patient ID
IllnessA|IllnessB - 1
Illness A - 2

From what I read I understand that ctr stands for the name of a disease.
When you are doing this query:
raw_data[(raw_data['Finding Labels'].str.contains(ctr)) & (raw_data['Patient ID'] == i)].size
You are not only filtering the rows which have the disease, but also which have a specific patient id. If you have a lot of patients, you will need to do this query a lot of times. A simpler way to do it would be to not filter on the patient id and then take the count of all the rows which have the disease.
This would be:
raw_data[raw_data['Finding Labels'].str.contains(ctr)].size
And in this case since you want the number of rows, len is what you are looking for instead of size (size will be the number of cells in the dataframe).
Finally another source of error in your current code was the fact that you were not keeping the count for every patient id. You needed to increment illnesses.at[index, "Count_of_Patientes_Having"] not set it to a new value each time.
The code would be something like (for the last few lines), assuming you want to keep the disease name and the index separate:
for index, ctr in enumerate(data[:1]):
illnesses.at[index, "Finding_Label"] = ctr
illnesses.at[index, "Count_of_Times_Being_Shown_In_An_Image"] = len(raw_data[raw_data["Finding Labels"].str.contains(ctr)]) / 12
illnesses.at[index, "Count_of_Patientes_Having"] = len(raw_data[raw_data['Finding Labels'].str.contains(ctr)])
I took the liberty of using enumerate for a more pythonic way of handling indexes. I also don't really know what "Count_of_Times_Being_Shown_In_An_Image" is, but I assumed you had had the same confusion between size and len.

Likely the reason your code is slow is that you are growing a data frame row-by-row inside a loop which can involve multiple in-memory copying. Usually this is reminiscent of general purpose Python and not Pandas programming which ideally handles data in blockwise, vectorized processing.
Consider a cross join of your data (assuming a reasonable data size) to the list of illnesses to line up Finding Labels to each illness in same row to be filtered if longer string contains shorter item. Then, run a couple of groupby() to return the count and distinct count by patient.
# CROSS JOIN LIST WITH MAIN DATA FRAME (ALL ROWS MATCHED)
raw_data = (raw_data.assign(key=1)
.merge(pd.DataFrame({'ills':ills, 'key':1}), on='key')
.drop(columns=['key'])
)
# SUBSET BY ILLNESS CONTAINED IN LONGER STRING
raw_data = raw_data[raw_data.apply(lambda x: x['ills'] in x['Finding Labels'], axis=1)]
# CALCULATE GROUP BY count AND distinct count
def count_distinct(grp):
return (grp.groupby('Patient ID').size()).size
illnesses = pd.DataFrame({'Count_of_Times_Being_Shown_In_An_Image': raw_data.groupby('ills').size(),
'Count_of_Patients_Having': raw_data.groupby('ills').apply(count_distinct)})
To demonstrate, consider below with random, seeded input data and output.
Input Data (attempting to mirror original data)
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
alpha = 'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789'
data_tools = ['sas', 'stata', 'spss', 'python', 'r', 'julia']
ills = ["Cardiomegaly", "Emphysema", "Effusion", "No Finding", "Hernia",
"Infiltration", "Mass", "Nodule", "Atelectasis", "Pneumothorax",
"Pleural_Thickening", "Pneumonia", "Fibrosis", "Edema", "Consolidation"]
np.random.seed(542019)
raw_data = pd.DataFrame({'Patient ID': np.random.choice(data_tools, 25),
'Finding Labels': np.core.defchararray.add(
np.core.defchararray.add(np.array([''.join(np.random.choice(list(alpha), 3)) for _ in range(25)]),
np.random.choice(ills, 25).astype('str')),
np.array([''.join(np.random.choice(list(alpha), 3)) for _ in range(25)]))
})
print(raw_data.head(10))
# Patient ID Finding Labels
# 0 r xPNPneumothoraxXYm
# 1 python ScSInfiltration9Ud
# 2 stata tJhInfiltrationJtG
# 3 r thLPneumoniaWdr
# 4 stata thYAtelectasis6iW
# 5 sas 2WLPneumonia1if
# 6 julia OPEConsolidationKq0
# 7 sas UFFCardiomegaly7wZ
# 8 stata 9NQHerniaMl4
# 9 python NB8HerniapWK
Output (after running above process)
print(illnesses)
# Count_of_Times_Being_Shown_In_An_Image Count_of_Patients_Having
# ills
# Atelectasis 3 1
# Cardiomegaly 2 1
# Consolidation 1 1
# Effusion 1 1
# Emphysema 1 1
# Fibrosis 2 2
# Hernia 4 3
# Infiltration 2 2
# Mass 1 1
# Nodule 2 2
# Pleural_Thickening 1 1
# Pneumonia 3 3
# Pneumothorax 2 2