Using Sybase as the main transactional DB and SQLite as the in memory DB for Integration tests.
Issue I am facing is conflicting behavior of the two implementations.
I need to execute a query similar to
select dbo.get_name(id), id from some_table
This runs perfectly fine in sybase (I understand the importance of schema prefix for user defined functions). However SQL lite throws error saying SQLite.Operational error near "("
Tried to add dbo as schema while creating SQLite connections but no luck.
Using Python for all the implementation.
You could make dbo a group, and make all your users member of that group. Then you could avoid using the schema prefix at all.
Or, you could have a SQLite database named dbo where you put the function get_name.
Related
Now I am doing something freaky here... I want to ingest data from a pandas dataframe into an in-memory OLTP database on Microsoft SQL Server 2019. The table is not existing yet and I want to create it on the fly based on the pandas dataframe.
For that, I modify the SQL create statement that pandas generates before it usually inserts data so that I will actually create the table as an in-memory table. The create statement works fine when used directly in Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio.
However, when I use SQLAlchemy to run the create statement from within my Python script, I receive the following error message:
DDL statements ALTER, DROP and CREATE inside user transactions are not supported with memory optimized tables.
What does this mean? What is a user transaction? What could I try to make this work?
Thanks
I found out that the cause was due to the autocommit flag being set to False by default. After setting it to True, everything works as expected
I am attempting to execute a raw sql insert statement in Sqlalchemy, SQL Alchemy throws no errors when the constructed insert statement is executed but the lines do not appear in the database.
As far as I can tell, it isn't a syntax error (see no 2), it isn't an engine error as the ORM can execute an equivalent write properly (see no 1), it's finding the table it's supposed to write too (see no 3). I think it's a problem with a transaction not being commited and have attempted to address this (see no 4) but this hasn't solved the issue. Is it possible to create a nested transaction and what would start the 'first' so to speak?
Thankyou for any answers.
Some background:
I know that the ORM facilitates this and have used this feature and it works, but is too slow for our application. We decided to try using raw sql for this particular write function due to how often it's called and the ORM for everything else. An equivalent method using the ORM works perfectly, and the same engine is used for both, so it can't be an engine problem right?
I've issued an example of the SQL that the method using raw sql constructs to the database directly and that reads in fine, so I don't think it's a syntax error.
it's communicating with the database properly and can find the table as any syntax errors with table and column names throw a programmatic error so it's not just throwing stuff into the 'void' so to speak.
My first thought after reading around was that it was transaction error and that a transaction was being created and not closed, and so constructed the execute statement as such to ensure a transaction was properly created and commited.
with self.Engine.connect() as connection:
connection.execute(Insert_Statement)
connection.commit
The so called 'Insert Statement' has been converted to text using the sqlalchemy 'text' function, I don't quite understand why it won't execute if I pass the constructed string directly to the execute statement but mention it in case it's relevant.
Other things that may be relevant:
Python3 is running on an individual ec2 instance the postgres database on another. The table in particular is a timescaledb hypertable taking realtime data, hence the need for very fast writes, but probably not relevant.
Currently using pg8000 as dialect for no particular reason other than psycopg2 was throwing errors when trying the execute an equivalent method using the ORM.
Just so this question is answered in case anyone else ends up here:
The issue was a failure to call commit as a method, as #snakecharmerb pointed out. Gord Thompson also provided an alternate method using 'begin' which automatically commits rather than connection which is a 'commit as you go' style transaction.
I've tried many contortions on this problem to try to figure out what's going on.
My SQLAlchemy code specified tables as schema.table. I have a special connection object that connects using the specified connect string if the database is PostgreSQL or Oracle, but if the database is SQLite, it connects to a :memory: database, then attaches the SQLite file-based database using the schema name. This allows me to use schema names throughout my SQLAlchemy code without a problem.
But when I try to set up Alembic to see my database, it fails completely. What am I doing wrong?
I ran into several issues that had to be worked through before I got this working.
Initially, Alembic didn't see my database at all. If I tried to specify it in the alembic.ini file, it would load the SQLite database using the default schema, but my model code specified a schema, so that didn't work. I had to change alembic/env.py in run_migrations_online() to call my connection method from my code instead of using engine_from_config. In my case, I created a database object that had a connect() method that would return the engine and the metadata. I called that as connectable, meta = db.connect(). I would return the schema name with schema=db.schema(). I had to import the db class from my SQLAlchemy code to get access to these.
Now I was getting a migration that would build up the entire database from scratch, but I couldn't run that migration because my database already had those changes. So apparently Alembic wasn't seeing my database. Alembic also kept telling me that my database was out of date. The problem there was that the alembic table alembic_version was being written to my :memory: database, and as soon as the connection was dropped, so was the database. So to get Alembic to remember the migration, I needed that table to be created in my database. I added more code to env.py to pass the schema to context.configure using the version_table_schema=my_schema.
When I went to generate the migration again, I still got the migration that would build the database from scratch, so Alembic STILL wasn't seeing my database. After lots more Googling, I found that I needed to pass include_schemas=True to context.configure in env.py. But after I added that, I started getting tracebacks from Alembic.
Fortunately, my configuration was set up to provide both the connection and the metadata. By changing the target_metadata=target_metadata line to target_metadata=meta (my local metadata returned from the connection), I got around these tracebacks as well, and Alembic started to behave properly.
So to recap, to get Alembic working with a SQLite database attached as a schema name, I had to import the connection script I use for my Flask code. That connection script properly attaches the SQLite database, then reflects the metadata. It returns both the engine and the metadata. I return the engine to the "connectable" variable in env.py, and return the metadata to the new local variable meta. I also return the schema name to the local variable schema.
In the with connectable.connect() as connection: block, I then pass to context.configure additional arguments target_metadata=meta, version_table_schema=schema, and include_schemas=True where meta and schema are my new local variables set above.
With all of these changes, I thought I was able to work with SQLite databases attached as schemas. Unfortunately, I continued to run into problems with this, and eventually decided that I simply wouldn't work with SQLite with Alembic. Our rule now is that Alembic migrations are only for non-SQLite databases, and SQLite data has to be migrated to another database before attempting an Alembic migration of the data.
I'm documenting this so that anyone else facing this may be able to follow what I've done and possibly get Alembic working for SQLite.
I'm trying to execute this query, it's working fine in MySQL workbench, but It's not working in python shell.
And I have to export that result in an Excel sheet.
As de error suggests the SELECT clause must contain the primary key in order to be able to build the ORM object. By default, the primary key is a column named pk. I advise using "SELECT *" in this case if possible, maybe the "AS" could give problems too.
I have created a Python module that creates and populates several SQLite tables. Now, I want to use it in a program but I don't really know how to call it properly. All the tutorials I've found are essentially "inline", i.e. they walk through using SQLite in a linear fashion rather than how to actually use it in production.
What I'm trying to do is have a method check to see if the database is already created. If so, then I can use it. If not, an exception is raised and the program will create the database. (Or use if/else statements, whichever is better).
I created a test script to see if my logic is correct but it's not working. When I create the try statement, it just creates a new database rather than checking if one already exists. The next time I run the script, I get an error that the table already exists, even if I tried catching the exception. (I haven't used try/except before but figured this is a good time to learn).
Are there any good tutorials for using SQLite operationally or any suggestions on how to code this? I've looked through the pysqlite tutorial and others I found but they don't address this.
Don't make this more complex than it needs to be. The big, independent databases have complex setup and configuration requirements. SQLite is just a file you access with SQL, it's much simpler.
Do the following.
Add a table to your database for "Components" or "Versions" or "Configuration" or "Release" or something administrative like that.
CREATE TABLE REVISION(
RELEASE_NUMBER CHAR(20)
);
In your application, connect to your database normally.
Execute a simple query against the revision table. Here's what can happen.
The query fails to execute: your database doesn't exist, so execute a series of CREATE statements to build it.
The query succeeds but returns no rows or the release number is lower than expected: your database exists, but is out of date. You need to migrate from that release to the current release. Hopefully, you have a sequence of DROP, CREATE and ALTER statements to do this.
The query succeeds, and the release number is the expected value. Do nothing more, your database is configured correctly.
AFAIK an SQLITE database is just a file.
To check if the database exists, check for file existence.
When you open a SQLITE database it will automatically create one if the file that backs it up is not in place.
If you try and open a file as a sqlite3 database that is NOT a database, you will get this:
"sqlite3.DatabaseError: file is encrypted or is not a database"
so check to see if the file exists and also make sure to try and catch the exception in case the file is not a sqlite3 database
SQLite automatically creates the database file the first time you try to use it. The SQL statements for creating tables can use IF NOT EXISTS to make the commands only take effect if the table has not been created This way you don't need to check for the database's existence beforehand: SQLite can take care of that for you.
The main thing I would still be worried about is that executing CREATE TABLE IF EXISTS for every web transaction (say) would be inefficient; you can avoid that by having the program keep an (in-memory) variable saying whether it has created the database today, so it runs the CREATE TABLE script once per run. This would still allow for you to delete the database and start over during debugging.
As #diciu pointed out, the database file will be created by sqlite3.connect.
If you want to take a special action when the file is not there, you'll have to explicitly check for existance:
import os
import sqlite3
if not os.path.exists(mydb_path):
#create new DB, create table stocks
con = sqlite3.connect(mydb_path)
con.execute('''create table stocks
(date text, trans text, symbol text, qty real, price real)''')
else:
#use existing DB
con = sqlite3.connect(mydb_path)
...
Sqlite doesn't throw an exception if you create a new database with the same name, it will just connect to it. Since sqlite is a file based database, I suggest you just check for the existence of the file.
About your second problem, to check if a table has been already created, just catch the exception. An exception "sqlite3.OperationalError: table TEST already exists" is thrown if the table already exist.
import sqlite3
import os
database_name = "newdb.db"
if not os.path.isfile(database_name):
print "the database already exist"
db_connection = sqlite3.connect(database_name)
db_cursor = db_connection.cursor()
try:
db_cursor.execute('CREATE TABLE TEST (a INTEGER);')
except sqlite3.OperationalError, msg:
print msg
Doing SQL in overall is horrible in any language I've picked up. SQLalchemy has shown to be easiest from them to use because actual query and committing with it is so clean and absent from troubles.
Here's some basic steps on actually using sqlalchemy in your app, better details can be found from the documentation.
provide table definitions and create ORM-mappings
load database
ask it to create tables from the definitions (won't do so if they exist)
create session maker (optional)
create session
After creating a session, you can commit and query from the database.
See this solution at SourceForge which covers your question in a tutorial manner, with instructive source code :
y_serial.py module :: warehouse Python objects with SQLite
"Serialization + persistance :: in a few lines of code, compress and annotate Python objects into SQLite; then later retrieve them chronologically by keywords without any SQL. Most useful "standard" module for a database to store schema-less data."
http://yserial.sourceforge.net
Yes, I was nuking out the problem. All I needed to do was check for the file and catch the IOError if it didn't exist.
Thanks for all the other answers. They may come in handy in the future.