Develop Reference

Deriving Cubic Bezier Curve control points & handles from series of points in Python

I am trying to find the control points and handles of a Cubic Bezier curve from a series of points. My current code is below (credit to Zero Zero on the Python Discord). The Cubic Spline is creating the desired fit, but the handles (in orange) are incorrect. How may I find the handles of this curve?
Thank you!
import numpy as np
import scipy as sp
def fit_curve(points):
# Fit a cubic bezier curve to the points
curve = sp.interpolate.CubicSpline(points[:, 0], points[:, 1], bc_type=((1, 0.0), (1, 0.0)))
# Get 4 control points for the curve
p = np.zeros((4, 2))
p[0, :] = points[0, :]
p[3, :] = points[-1, :]
p[1, :] = points[0, :] + 0.3 * (points[-1, :] - points[0, :])
p[2, :] = points[-1, :] - 0.3 * (points[-1, :] - points[0, :])
return p, curve
ypoints = [0.0, 0.03771681353260319, 0.20421680080883106, 0.49896111463402026, 0.7183501026981503, 0.8481517096346528, 0.9256128196832564, 0.9705404287079152, 0.9933297674379904, 1.0]
xpoints = [x for x in range(len(ypoints))]
points = np.array([xpoints, ypoints]).T
from scipy.interpolate import splprep, splev
tck, u = splprep([xpoints, ypoints], s=0)
#print(tck, u)
xnew, ynew = splev(np.linspace(0, 1, 100), tck)
# Plot the original points and the Bézier curve
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
#plt.plot(xpoints, ypoints, 'x', xnew, ynew, xpoints, ypoints, 'b')
plt.axis([0, 10, -0.05, 1.05])
plt.legend(['Points', 'Bézier curve', 'True curve'])
plt.title('Bézier curve fitting')
# Get the curve
p, curve = fit_curve(points)
# Plot the points and the curve
plt.plot(points[:, 0], points[:, 1], 'o')
plt.plot(p[:, 0], p[:, 1], 'o')
plt.plot(np.linspace(0, 9, 100), curve(np.linspace(0, 9, 100)))
plt.show()

The answer for my case was a Bezier best fit function that accepts an input of point values, fits the points to a Cubic Spline, and outputs the Bézier handles of the curve by finding their coefficients.
Here is one such script, fitCurves, which can be used like so:
import numpy as np
from fitCurve import fitCurve
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
y = [0.0,
0.03771681353260319,
0.20421680080883106,
0.49896111463402026,
0.7183501026981503,
0.8481517096346528,
0.9256128196832564,
0.9705404287079152,
0.9933297674379904,
1.0]
x = np.linspace(0, 1, len(y))
pts = np.array([x,y]).T
bezier_handles = fitCurve(points=pts , maxError=20)
x_bez = []
y_bez = []
for bez in bezier_handles:
for pt in bez:
x_bez.append(pt[0])
y_bez.append(pt[1])
plt.plot(pts[:,0], pts[:,1], 'bo-', label='Points')
plt.plot(x_bez[:2], y_bez[:2], 'ro--', label='Handle') # handle 1
plt.plot(x_bez[2:4], y_bez[2:4], 'ro--') # handle 2
plt.legend()
plt.show()
fitCurve.py
from numpy import *
""" Python implementation of
Algorithm for Automatically Fitting Digitized Curves
by Philip J. Schneider
"Graphics Gems", Academic Press, 1990
"""
# evaluates cubic bezier at t, return point
def q(ctrlPoly, t):
return (1.0-t)**3 * ctrlPoly[0] + 3*(1.0-t)**2 * t * ctrlPoly[1] + 3*(1.0-t)* t**2 * ctrlPoly[2] + t**3 * ctrlPoly[3]
# evaluates cubic bezier first derivative at t, return point
def qprime(ctrlPoly, t):
return 3*(1.0-t)**2 * (ctrlPoly[1]-ctrlPoly[0]) + 6*(1.0-t) * t * (ctrlPoly[2]-ctrlPoly[1]) + 3*t**2 * (ctrlPoly[3]-ctrlPoly[2])
# evaluates cubic bezier second derivative at t, return point
def qprimeprime(ctrlPoly, t):
return 6*(1.0-t) * (ctrlPoly[2]-2*ctrlPoly[1]+ctrlPoly[0]) + 6*(t) * (ctrlPoly[3]-2*ctrlPoly[2]+ctrlPoly[1])
# Fit one (ore more) Bezier curves to a set of points
def fitCurve(points, maxError):
leftTangent = normalize(points[1] - points[0])
rightTangent = normalize(points[-2] - points[-1])
return fitCubic(points, leftTangent, rightTangent, maxError)
def fitCubic(points, leftTangent, rightTangent, error):
# Use heuristic if region only has two points in it
if (len(points) == 2):
dist = linalg.norm(points[0] - points[1]) / 3.0
bezCurve = [points[0], points[0] + leftTangent * dist, points[1] + rightTangent * dist, points[1]]
return [bezCurve]
# Parameterize points, and attempt to fit curve
u = chordLengthParameterize(points)
bezCurve = generateBezier(points, u, leftTangent, rightTangent)
# Find max deviation of points to fitted curve
maxError, splitPoint = computeMaxError(points, bezCurve, u)
if maxError < error:
return [bezCurve]
# If error not too large, try some reparameterization and iteration
if maxError < error**2:
for i in range(20):
uPrime = reparameterize(bezCurve, points, u)
bezCurve = generateBezier(points, uPrime, leftTangent, rightTangent)
maxError, splitPoint = computeMaxError(points, bezCurve, uPrime)
if maxError < error:
return [bezCurve]
u = uPrime
# Fitting failed -- split at max error point and fit recursively
beziers = []
centerTangent = normalize(points[splitPoint-1] - points[splitPoint+1])
beziers += fitCubic(points[:splitPoint+1], leftTangent, centerTangent, error)
beziers += fitCubic(points[splitPoint:], -centerTangent, rightTangent, error)
return beziers
def generateBezier(points, parameters, leftTangent, rightTangent):
bezCurve = [points[0], None, None, points[-1]]
# compute the A's
A = zeros((len(parameters), 2, 2))
for i, u in enumerate(parameters):
A[i][0] = leftTangent * 3*(1-u)**2 * u
A[i][1] = rightTangent * 3*(1-u) * u**2
# Create the C and X matrices
C = zeros((2, 2))
X = zeros(2)
for i, (point, u) in enumerate(zip(points, parameters)):
C[0][0] += dot(A[i][0], A[i][0])
C[0][1] += dot(A[i][0], A[i][1])
C[1][0] += dot(A[i][0], A[i][1])
C[1][1] += dot(A[i][1], A[i][1])
tmp = point - q([points[0], points[0], points[-1], points[-1]], u)
X[0] += dot(A[i][0], tmp)
X[1] += dot(A[i][1], tmp)
# Compute the determinants of C and X
det_C0_C1 = C[0][0] * C[1][1] - C[1][0] * C[0][1]
det_C0_X = C[0][0] * X[1] - C[1][0] * X[0]
det_X_C1 = X[0] * C[1][1] - X[1] * C[0][1]
# Finally, derive alpha values
alpha_l = 0.0 if det_C0_C1 == 0 else det_X_C1 / det_C0_C1
alpha_r = 0.0 if det_C0_C1 == 0 else det_C0_X / det_C0_C1
# If alpha negative, use the Wu/Barsky heuristic (see text) */
# (if alpha is 0, you get coincident control points that lead to
# divide by zero in any subsequent NewtonRaphsonRootFind() call. */
segLength = linalg.norm(points[0] - points[-1])
epsilon = 1.0e-6 * segLength
if alpha_l < epsilon or alpha_r < epsilon:
# fall back on standard (probably inaccurate) formula, and subdivide further if needed.
bezCurve[1] = bezCurve[0] + leftTangent * (segLength / 3.0)
bezCurve[2] = bezCurve[3] + rightTangent * (segLength / 3.0)
else:
# First and last control points of the Bezier curve are
# positioned exactly at the first and last data points
# Control points 1 and 2 are positioned an alpha distance out
# on the tangent vectors, left and right, respectively
bezCurve[1] = bezCurve[0] + leftTangent * alpha_l
bezCurve[2] = bezCurve[3] + rightTangent * alpha_r
return bezCurve
def reparameterize(bezier, points, parameters):
return [newtonRaphsonRootFind(bezier, point, u) for point, u in zip(points, parameters)]
def newtonRaphsonRootFind(bez, point, u):
"""
Newton's root finding algorithm calculates f(x)=0 by reiterating
x_n+1 = x_n - f(x_n)/f'(x_n)
We are trying to find curve parameter u for some point p that minimizes
the distance from that point to the curve. Distance point to curve is d=q(u)-p.
At minimum distance the point is perpendicular to the curve.
We are solving
f = q(u)-p * q'(u) = 0
with
f' = q'(u) * q'(u) + q(u)-p * q''(u)
gives
u_n+1 = u_n - |q(u_n)-p * q'(u_n)| / |q'(u_n)**2 + q(u_n)-p * q''(u_n)|
"""
d = q(bez, u)-point
numerator = (d * qprime(bez, u)).sum()
denominator = (qprime(bez, u)**2 + d * qprimeprime(bez, u)).sum()
if denominator == 0.0:
return u
else:
return u - numerator/denominator
def chordLengthParameterize(points):
u = [0.0]
for i in range(1, len(points)):
u.append(u[i-1] + linalg.norm(points[i] - points[i-1]))
for i, _ in enumerate(u):
u[i] = u[i] / u[-1]
return u
def computeMaxError(points, bez, parameters):
maxDist = 0.0
splitPoint = len(points)/2
for i, (point, u) in enumerate(zip(points, parameters)):
dist = linalg.norm(q(bez, u)-point)**2
if dist > maxDist:
maxDist = dist
splitPoint = i
return maxDist, splitPoint
def normalize(v):
return v / linalg.norm(v)

How to increase FPS in ursina python

I want to create survival games with infinite block terrain(like Minecraft). So i using ursina python game engine, you can see it here
So i using perlin noise to create the terrain with build-in ursina block model. I test for first 25 block and it work pretty good with above 100 FPS, so i start increase to 250 block and more because I want a infinite terrain. But i ran to some problem, when i increase to 100 block or more, my FPS start to decrease below 30 FPS (With i create just one layer).
Here is my code:
#-------------------------------Noise.py(I got on the github)-------------------------
# Copyright (c) 2008, Casey Duncan (casey dot duncan at gmail dot com)
# see LICENSE.txt for details
"""Perlin noise -- pure python implementation"""
__version__ = '$Id: perlin.py 521 2008-12-15 03:03:52Z casey.duncan $'
from math import floor, fmod, sqrt
from random import randint
# 3D Gradient vectors
_GRAD3 = ((1,1,0),(-1,1,0),(1,-1,0),(-1,-1,0),
(1,0,1),(-1,0,1),(1,0,-1),(-1,0,-1),
(0,1,1),(0,-1,1),(0,1,-1),(0,-1,-1),
(1,1,0),(0,-1,1),(-1,1,0),(0,-1,-1),
)
# 4D Gradient vectors
_GRAD4 = ((0,1,1,1), (0,1,1,-1), (0,1,-1,1), (0,1,-1,-1),
(0,-1,1,1), (0,-1,1,-1), (0,-1,-1,1), (0,-1,-1,-1),
(1,0,1,1), (1,0,1,-1), (1,0,-1,1), (1,0,-1,-1),
(-1,0,1,1), (-1,0,1,-1), (-1,0,-1,1), (-1,0,-1,-1),
(1,1,0,1), (1,1,0,-1), (1,-1,0,1), (1,-1,0,-1),
(-1,1,0,1), (-1,1,0,-1), (-1,-1,0,1), (-1,-1,0,-1),
(1,1,1,0), (1,1,-1,0), (1,-1,1,0), (1,-1,-1,0),
(-1,1,1,0), (-1,1,-1,0), (-1,-1,1,0), (-1,-1,-1,0))
# A lookup table to traverse the simplex around a given point in 4D.
# Details can be found where this table is used, in the 4D noise method.
_SIMPLEX = (
(0,1,2,3),(0,1,3,2),(0,0,0,0),(0,2,3,1),(0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(1,2,3,0),
(0,2,1,3),(0,0,0,0),(0,3,1,2),(0,3,2,1),(0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(1,3,2,0),
(0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),
(1,2,0,3),(0,0,0,0),(1,3,0,2),(0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(2,3,0,1),(2,3,1,0),
(1,0,2,3),(1,0,3,2),(0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(2,0,3,1),(0,0,0,0),(2,1,3,0),
(0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),
(2,0,1,3),(0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(3,0,1,2),(3,0,2,1),(0,0,0,0),(3,1,2,0),
(2,1,0,3),(0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(3,1,0,2),(0,0,0,0),(3,2,0,1),(3,2,1,0))
# Simplex skew constants
_F2 = 0.5 * (sqrt(3.0) - 1.0)
_G2 = (3.0 - sqrt(3.0)) / 6.0
_F3 = 1.0 / 3.0
_G3 = 1.0 / 6.0
class BaseNoise:
"""Noise abstract base class"""
permutation = (151,160,137,91,90,15,
131,13,201,95,96,53,194,233,7,225,140,36,103,30,69,142,8,99,37,240,21,10,23,
190,6,148,247,120,234,75,0,26,197,62,94,252,219,203,117,35,11,32,57,177,33,
88,237,149,56,87,174,20,125,136,171,168,68,175,74,165,71,134,139,48,27,166,
77,146,158,231,83,111,229,122,60,211,133,230,220,105,92,41,55,46,245,40,244,
102,143,54,65,25,63,161,1,216,80,73,209,76,132,187,208,89,18,169,200,196,
135,130,116,188,159,86,164,100,109,198,173,186,3,64,52,217,226,250,124,123,
5,202,38,147,118,126,255,82,85,212,207,206,59,227,47,16,58,17,182,189,28,42,
223,183,170,213,119,248,152,2,44,154,163,70,221,153,101,155,167,43,172,9,
129,22,39,253,9,98,108,110,79,113,224,232,178,185,112,104,218,246,97,228,
251,34,242,193,238,210,144,12,191,179,162,241, 81,51,145,235,249,14,239,107,
49,192,214,31,181,199,106,157,184,84,204,176,115,121,50,45,127,4,150,254,
138,236,205,93,222,114,67,29,24,72,243,141,128,195,78,66,215,61,156,180)
period = len(permutation)
# Double permutation array so we don't need to wrap
permutation = permutation * 2
randint_function = randint
def __init__(self, period=None, permutation_table=None, randint_function=None):
"""Initialize the noise generator. With no arguments, the default
period and permutation table are used (256). The default permutation
table generates the exact same noise pattern each time.
An integer period can be specified, to generate a random permutation
table with period elements. The period determines the (integer)
interval that the noise repeats, which is useful for creating tiled
textures. period should be a power-of-two, though this is not
enforced. Note that the speed of the noise algorithm is indpendent of
the period size, though larger periods mean a larger table, which
consume more memory.
A permutation table consisting of an iterable sequence of whole
numbers can be specified directly. This should have a power-of-two
length. Typical permutation tables are a sequnce of unique integers in
the range [0,period) in random order, though other arrangements could
prove useful, they will not be "pure" simplex noise. The largest
element in the sequence must be no larger than period-1.
period and permutation_table may not be specified together.
A substitute for the method random.randint(a, b) can be chosen. The
method must take two integer parameters a and b and return an integer N
such that a <= N <= b.
"""
if randint_function is not None: # do this before calling randomize()
if not hasattr(randint_function, '__call__'):
raise TypeError(
'randint_function has to be a function')
self.randint_function = randint_function
if period is None:
period = self.period # enforce actually calling randomize()
if period is not None and permutation_table is not None:
raise ValueError(
'Can specify either period or permutation_table, not both')
if period is not None:
self.randomize(period)
elif permutation_table is not None:
self.permutation = tuple(permutation_table) * 2
self.period = len(permutation_table)
def randomize(self, period=None):
"""Randomize the permutation table used by the noise functions. This
makes them generate a different noise pattern for the same inputs.
"""
if period is not None:
self.period = period
perm = list(range(self.period))
perm_right = self.period - 1
for i in list(perm):
j = self.randint_function(0, perm_right)
perm[i], perm[j] = perm[j], perm[i]
self.permutation = tuple(perm) * 2
class SimplexNoise(BaseNoise):
"""Perlin simplex noise generator
Adapted from Stefan Gustavson's Java implementation described here:
http://staffwww.itn.liu.se/~stegu/simplexnoise/simplexnoise.pdf
To summarize:
"In 2001, Ken Perlin presented 'simplex noise', a replacement for his classic
noise algorithm. Classic 'Perlin noise' won him an academy award and has
become an ubiquitous procedural primitive for computer graphics over the
years, but in hindsight it has quite a few limitations. Ken Perlin himself
designed simplex noise specifically to overcome those limitations, and he
spent a lot of good thinking on it. Therefore, it is a better idea than his
original algorithm. A few of the more prominent advantages are:
* Simplex noise has a lower computational complexity and requires fewer
multiplications.
* Simplex noise scales to higher dimensions (4D, 5D and up) with much less
computational cost, the complexity is O(N) for N dimensions instead of
the O(2^N) of classic Noise.
* Simplex noise has no noticeable directional artifacts. Simplex noise has
a well-defined and continuous gradient everywhere that can be computed
quite cheaply.
* Simplex noise is easy to implement in hardware."
"""
def noise2(self, x, y):
"""2D Perlin simplex noise.
Return a floating point value from -1 to 1 for the given x, y coordinate.
The same value is always returned for a given x, y pair unless the
permutation table changes (see randomize above).
"""
# Skew input space to determine which simplex (triangle) we are in
s = (x + y) * _F2
i = floor(x + s)
j = floor(y + s)
t = (i + j) * _G2
x0 = x - (i - t) # "Unskewed" distances from cell origin
y0 = y - (j - t)
if x0 > y0:
i1 = 1; j1 = 0 # Lower triangle, XY order: (0,0)->(1,0)->(1,1)
else:
i1 = 0; j1 = 1 # Upper triangle, YX order: (0,0)->(0,1)->(1,1)
x1 = x0 - i1 + _G2 # Offsets for middle corner in (x,y) unskewed coords
y1 = y0 - j1 + _G2
x2 = x0 + _G2 * 2.0 - 1.0 # Offsets for last corner in (x,y) unskewed coords
y2 = y0 + _G2 * 2.0 - 1.0
# Determine hashed gradient indices of the three simplex corners
perm = self.permutation
ii = int(i) % self.period
jj = int(j) % self.period
gi0 = perm[ii + perm[jj]] % 12
gi1 = perm[ii + i1 + perm[jj + j1]] % 12
gi2 = perm[ii + 1 + perm[jj + 1]] % 12
# Calculate the contribution from the three corners
tt = 0.5 - x0**2 - y0**2
if tt > 0:
g = _GRAD3[gi0]
noise = tt**4 * (g[0] * x0 + g[1] * y0)
else:
noise = 0.0
tt = 0.5 - x1**2 - y1**2
if tt > 0:
g = _GRAD3[gi1]
noise += tt**4 * (g[0] * x1 + g[1] * y1)
tt = 0.5 - x2**2 - y2**2
if tt > 0:
g = _GRAD3[gi2]
noise += tt**4 * (g[0] * x2 + g[1] * y2)
return noise * 70.0 # scale noise to [-1, 1]
def noise3(self, x, y, z):
"""3D Perlin simplex noise.
Return a floating point value from -1 to 1 for the given x, y, z coordinate.
The same value is always returned for a given x, y, z pair unless the
permutation table changes (see randomize above).
"""
# Skew the input space to determine which simplex cell we're in
s = (x + y + z) * _F3
i = floor(x + s)
j = floor(y + s)
k = floor(z + s)
t = (i + j + k) * _G3
x0 = x - (i - t) # "Unskewed" distances from cell origin
y0 = y - (j - t)
z0 = z - (k - t)
# For the 3D case, the simplex shape is a slightly irregular tetrahedron.
# Determine which simplex we are in.
if x0 >= y0:
if y0 >= z0:
i1 = 1; j1 = 0; k1 = 0
i2 = 1; j2 = 1; k2 = 0
elif x0 >= z0:
i1 = 1; j1 = 0; k1 = 0
i2 = 1; j2 = 0; k2 = 1
else:
i1 = 0; j1 = 0; k1 = 1
i2 = 1; j2 = 0; k2 = 1
else: # x0 < y0
if y0 < z0:
i1 = 0; j1 = 0; k1 = 1
i2 = 0; j2 = 1; k2 = 1
elif x0 < z0:
i1 = 0; j1 = 1; k1 = 0
i2 = 0; j2 = 1; k2 = 1
else:
i1 = 0; j1 = 1; k1 = 0
i2 = 1; j2 = 1; k2 = 0
# Offsets for remaining corners
x1 = x0 - i1 + _G3
y1 = y0 - j1 + _G3
z1 = z0 - k1 + _G3
x2 = x0 - i2 + 2.0 * _G3
y2 = y0 - j2 + 2.0 * _G3
z2 = z0 - k2 + 2.0 * _G3
x3 = x0 - 1.0 + 3.0 * _G3
y3 = y0 - 1.0 + 3.0 * _G3
z3 = z0 - 1.0 + 3.0 * _G3
# Calculate the hashed gradient indices of the four simplex corners
perm = self.permutation
ii = int(i) % self.period
jj = int(j) % self.period
kk = int(k) % self.period
gi0 = perm[ii + perm[jj + perm[kk]]] % 12
gi1 = perm[ii + i1 + perm[jj + j1 + perm[kk + k1]]] % 12
gi2 = perm[ii + i2 + perm[jj + j2 + perm[kk + k2]]] % 12
gi3 = perm[ii + 1 + perm[jj + 1 + perm[kk + 1]]] % 12
# Calculate the contribution from the four corners
noise = 0.0
tt = 0.6 - x0**2 - y0**2 - z0**2
if tt > 0:
g = _GRAD3[gi0]
noise = tt**4 * (g[0] * x0 + g[1] * y0 + g[2] * z0)
else:
noise = 0.0
tt = 0.6 - x1**2 - y1**2 - z1**2
if tt > 0:
g = _GRAD3[gi1]
noise += tt**4 * (g[0] * x1 + g[1] * y1 + g[2] * z1)
tt = 0.6 - x2**2 - y2**2 - z2**2
if tt > 0:
g = _GRAD3[gi2]
noise += tt**4 * (g[0] * x2 + g[1] * y2 + g[2] * z2)
tt = 0.6 - x3**2 - y3**2 - z3**2
if tt > 0:
g = _GRAD3[gi3]
noise += tt**4 * (g[0] * x3 + g[1] * y3 + g[2] * z3)
return noise * 32.0
def lerp(t, a, b):
return a + t * (b - a)
def grad3(hash, x, y, z):
g = _GRAD3[hash % 16]
return x*g[0] + y*g[1] + z*g[2]
class TileableNoise(BaseNoise):
"""Tileable implemention of Perlin "improved" noise. This
is based on the reference implementation published here:
http://mrl.nyu.edu/~perlin/noise/
"""
def noise3(self, x, y, z, repeat, base=0.0):
"""Tileable 3D noise.
repeat specifies the integer interval in each dimension
when the noise pattern repeats.
base allows a different texture to be generated for
the same repeat interval.
"""
i = int(fmod(floor(x), repeat))
j = int(fmod(floor(y), repeat))
k = int(fmod(floor(z), repeat))
ii = (i + 1) % repeat
jj = (j + 1) % repeat
kk = (k + 1) % repeat
if base:
i += base; j += base; k += base
ii += base; jj += base; kk += base
x -= floor(x); y -= floor(y); z -= floor(z)
fx = x**3 * (x * (x * 6 - 15) + 10)
fy = y**3 * (y * (y * 6 - 15) + 10)
fz = z**3 * (z * (z * 6 - 15) + 10)
perm = self.permutation
A = perm[i]
AA = perm[A + j]
AB = perm[A + jj]
B = perm[ii]
BA = perm[B + j]
BB = perm[B + jj]
return lerp(fz, lerp(fy, lerp(fx, grad3(perm[AA + k], x, y, z),
grad3(perm[BA + k], x - 1, y, z)),
lerp(fx, grad3(perm[AB + k], x, y - 1, z),
grad3(perm[BB + k], x - 1, y - 1, z))),
lerp(fy, lerp(fx, grad3(perm[AA + kk], x, y, z - 1),
grad3(perm[BA + kk], x - 1, y, z - 1)),
lerp(fx, grad3(perm[AB + kk], x, y - 1, z - 1),
grad3(perm[BB + kk], x - 1, y - 1, z - 1))))
#--------------------------Math.py(For InverseLefp)--------------------------------
def Clamp(t: float, minimum: float, maximum: float):
"""Float result between a min and max values."""
value = t
if t < minimum:
value = minimum
elif t > maximum:
value = maximum
return value
def InverseLefp(a: float, b: float, value: float):
if a != b:
return Clamp((value - a) / (b - a), 0, 1)
return 0
#-----------------------------Game.py(Main code)----------------------
from ursina import *
from ursina.prefabs import *
from ursina.prefabs.first_person_controller import *
from Math import InverseLefp
import Noise
app = Ursina()
#The maximum height of the terrain
maxHeight = 10
#Control the width and height of the map
mapWidth = 10
mapHeight = 10
#A class that create a block
class Voxel(Button):
def __init__(self, position=(0,0,0)):
super().__init__(
parent = scene,
position = position,
model = 'cube',
origin_y = .5,
texture = 'white_cube',
color = color.color(0, 0, random.uniform(.9, 1.0)),
highlight_color = color.lime,
)
#Detect user key input
def input(self, key):
if self.hovered:
if key == 'right mouse down':
#Place block if user right click
voxel = Voxel(position=self.position + mouse.normal)
if key == 'left mouse down':
#Break block if user left click
destroy(self)
if key == 'escape':
#Exit the game if user press the esc key
app.userExit()
#Return perlin noise value between 0 and 1 with x, y position with scale = noiseScale
def GeneratedNoiseMap(y: int, x: int, noiseScale: float):
#Check if the noise scale was invalid or not
if noiseScale <= 0:
noiseScale = 0.001
sampleX = x / noiseScale
sampleY = y / noiseScale
#The Noise.SimplexNoise().noise2 will return the value between -1 and 1
perlinValue = Noise.SimplexNoise().noise2(sampleX, sampleY)
#The InverseLefp will make the value scale to between 0 and 1
perlinValue = InverseLefp(-1, 1, perlinValue)
return perlinValue
for z in range(mapHeight):
for x in range(mapWidth):
#Calculating the height of the block and round it to integer
height = round(GeneratedNoiseMap(z, x, 20) * maxHeight)
#Place the block and make it always below the player
block = Voxel(position=(x, height - maxHeight - 1, z))
#Set the collider of the block
block.collider = 'mesh'
#Character movement
player = FirstPersonController()
#Run the game
app.run()
All file in same folder.
It was working fine but the FPS is very low, so can anyone help?

I'm not able to test this code at the moment but this should serve as a starting point:
level_parent = Entity(model=Mesh(vertices=[], uvs=[]))
for z in range(mapHeight):
for x in range(mapWidth):
height = round(GeneratedNoiseMap(z, x, 20) * maxHeight)
block = Voxel(position=(x, height - maxHeight - 1, z))
level_parent.model.vertices.extend(block.model.vertices)
level_parent.collider = 'mesh' # call this only once after all vertices are set up
For texturing, you might have to add the block.uvs from each block to level_parent.model.uvs as well. Alternatively, call level_parent.model.project_uvs() after setting up the vertices.

On my version of ursina engine (5.0.0) only this code:
`
level_parent = Entity(model=Mesh(vertices=[], uvs=[]))
for z in range(mapHeight):
for x in range(mapWidth):
height = round(GeneratedNoiseMap(z, x, 20) * maxHeight)
block = Voxel(position=(x, height - maxHeight - 1, z))
#level_parent.model.vertices.extend(block.model.vertices)
level_parent.combine().vertices.extend(block.combine().vertices)
level_parent.collider = 'mesh'
`
is working.

Notch Reject Filtering in Python

I'm trying to implement notch-reject filtering in python for an assignment. I have tried using the notch reject filter formula from Rafael Gonzales book and all I got was a edge detected image. Then I tried ideal notch rejecting and here are the results:
Input image--Output of my program -- Expected output
Here is my code:
import cv2
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
def notch_reject_filter(shape, d0=9, u_k=0, v_k=0):
P, Q = shape
# Initialize filter with zeros
H = np.zeros((P, Q))
# Traverse through filter
for u in range(0, P):
for v in range(0, Q):
# Get euclidean distance from point D(u,v) to the center
D_uv = np.sqrt((u - P / 2 + u_k) ** 2 + (v - Q / 2 + v_k) ** 2)
D_muv = np.sqrt((u - P / 2 - u_k) ** 2 + (v - Q / 2 - v_k) ** 2)
if D_uv <= d0 or D_muv <= d0:
H[u, v] = 0.0
else:
H[u, v] = 1.0
return H
img = cv2.imread('input.png', 0)
img_shape = img.shape
original = np.fft.fft2(img)
center = np.fft.fftshift(original)
NotchRejectCenter = center * notch_reject_filter(img_shape, 32, 50, 50)
NotchReject = np.fft.ifftshift(NotchRejectCenter)
inverse_NotchReject = np.fft.ifft2(NotchReject) # Compute the inverse DFT of the result
plot_image = np.concatenate((img, np.abs(inverse_NotchReject)),axis=1)
plt.imshow(plot_image, "gray"), plt.title("Notch Reject Filter")
plt.show()

all I got was a edge detected image because your implementation was High pass filter which is a black circle in the middle, and that works as Edge detector.
Then I tried ideal notch rejecting This is correct if you applied that correctly.
The main concept is to filter the undesired Noise in the frequency domain, the noise can be seen as white spots, and your role is to suppress that white spots by multiplying them by black circles in frequency domain(known as filtering).
to improve this result add more notch filters (H5, H6, ...) to suppress the noise.
import cv2
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
#------------------------------------------------------
def notch_reject_filter(shape, d0=9, u_k=0, v_k=0):
P, Q = shape
# Initialize filter with zeros
H = np.zeros((P, Q))
# Traverse through filter
for u in range(0, P):
for v in range(0, Q):
# Get euclidean distance from point D(u,v) to the center
D_uv = np.sqrt((u - P / 2 + u_k) ** 2 + (v - Q / 2 + v_k) ** 2)
D_muv = np.sqrt((u - P / 2 - u_k) ** 2 + (v - Q / 2 - v_k) ** 2)
if D_uv <= d0 or D_muv <= d0:
H[u, v] = 0.0
else:
H[u, v] = 1.0
return H
#-----------------------------------------------------
img = cv2.imread('input.png', 0)
f = np.fft.fft2(img)
fshift = np.fft.fftshift(f)
phase_spectrumR = np.angle(fshift)
magnitude_spectrum = 20*np.log(np.abs(fshift))
img_shape = img.shape
H1 = notch_reject_filter(img_shape, 4, 38, 30)
H2 = notch_reject_filter(img_shape, 4, -42, 27)
H3 = notch_reject_filter(img_shape, 2, 80, 30)
H4 = notch_reject_filter(img_shape, 2, -82, 28)
NotchFilter = H1*H2*H3*H4
NotchRejectCenter = fshift * NotchFilter
NotchReject = np.fft.ifftshift(NotchRejectCenter)
inverse_NotchReject = np.fft.ifft2(NotchReject) # Compute the inverse DFT of the result
Result = np.abs(inverse_NotchReject)
plt.subplot(222)
plt.imshow(img, cmap='gray')
plt.title('Original')
plt.subplot(221)
plt.imshow(magnitude_spectrum, cmap='gray')
plt.title('magnitude spectrum')
plt.subplot(223)
plt.imshow(magnitude_spectrum*NotchFilter, "gray")
plt.title("Notch Reject Filter")
plt.subplot(224)
plt.imshow(Result, "gray")
plt.title("Result")
plt.show()

Drive by comment, using the for-loop for the notch filter generation is very slow. That operation can be optimized
def notch_reject_filter_vec(shape: tuple[int, int], d0: int, u_k: int, v_k: int):
(M, N) = shape
H_0_u = np.repeat(np.arange(M), N).reshape((M, N))
H_0_v = np.repeat(np.arange(N), M).reshape((N, M)).transpose()
D_uv = np.sqrt((H_0_u - M / 2 + u_k) ** 2 + (H_0_v - N / 2 + v_k) ** 2)
D_muv = np.sqrt((H_0_u - M / 2 - u_k) ** 2 + (H_0_v - N / 2 - v_k) ** 2)
selector_1 = D_uv <= d0
selector_2 = D_muv <= d0
selector = np.logical_or(selector_1, selector_2)
H = np.ones((M, N))
H[selector] = 0
return H

How to change Function by without Changing its Parameters

I am new to python and in learning stages. I wanted to implement Particle Swarm Optimization(PSO) algorithm which I did by taking help from on-line materials and python tutorials. In PSO, a simple calculus problem is inferred i-e 100 * ((y - (x2))2) + ((1 - (x2))2). This problem is defined in a fitness function.
def fitness(x, y):
return 100 * ((y - (x**2))**2) + ((1 - (x**2))**2)
Now, I want to replace this simple calculus problem by simple first order Ordinary Differential Equation(ODE) by without changing existing function parameters (x,y) and want to return the value of dy_dx,y0 and t for further process.
# Define a function which calculates the derivative
def dy_dx(y, x):
return x - y
t = np.linspace(0,5,100)
y0 = 1.0 # the initial condition
ys = odeint(dy_dx, y0, t)`
In python odeint function is used for ODE which requires three essential parameters i-e func/model, y0( Initial condition on y (can be a vector) and t(A sequence of time points for which to solve for y) Example of odeint parameters.
I don't want to change its parameters because it will be difficult for me to make changes in algorithm.
For simplicity I pasted the full code below and my question is open to anyone if wants to modify the code with further parameters in General Best, Personal Best and r[i].
import numpy as np
from scipy.integrate import odeint
import random as rand
from scipy.integrate import odeint
from numpy import array
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
def main():
#Variables
n = 40
num_variables = 2
a = np.empty((num_variables, n))
v = np.empty((num_variables, n))
Pbest = np.empty((num_variables, n))
Gbest = np.empty((1, 2))
r = np.empty((n))
for i in range(0, num_variables):
for j in range(0, n):
Pbest[i][j] = rand.randint(-20, 20)
a[i][j] = Pbest[i][j]
v[i][j] = 0
for i in range(0, n):
r[i] = fitness(a[0][i], a[1][i])
#Sort elements of Pbest
Order(Pbest, r, n)
Gbest[0][0] = Pbest[0][0]
Gbest[0][1] = Pbest[1][0]
generation = 0
plt.ion()
fig = plt.figure()
ax = fig.add_subplot(111)
ax.grid(True)
while(generation < 1000):
for i in range(n):
#Get Personal Best
if(fitness(a[0][i], a[1][i]) < fitness(Pbest[0][i], Pbest[1][i])):
Pbest[0][i] = a[0][i]
Pbest[1][i] = a[1][i]
#Get General Best
if(fitness(Pbest[0][i], Pbest[1][i]) < fitness(Gbest[0][0], Gbest[0][1])):
Gbest[0][0] = Pbest[0][i]
Gbest[0][1] = Pbest[1][i]
#Calculate Velocity
Vector_Velocidad(n, a, Pbest, Gbest, v)
generation = generation + 1
print 'Generacion: ' + str(generation) + ' - - - Gbest: ' +str(Gbest)
line1 = ax.plot(a[0], a[1], 'r+')
line2 = ax.plot(Gbest[0][0], Gbest[0][1], 'g*')
ax.set_xlim(-10, 10)
ax.set_ylim(-10, 10)
fig.canvas.draw()
ax.clear()
ax.grid(True)
print 'Gbest: '
print Gbest
def Vector_Velocidad(n, a, Pbest, Gbest, v):
for i in range(n):
#Velocity in X
v[0][i] = 0.7 * v[0][i] + (Pbest[0][i] - a[0][i]) * rand.random() * 1.47 + (Gbest[0][0] - a[0][i]) * rand.random() * 1.47
a[0][i] = a[0][i] + v[0][i]
v[1][i] = 0.7 * v[1][i] + (Pbest[1][i] - a[1][i]) * rand.random() * 1.47 + (Gbest[0][1] - a[1][i]) * rand.random() * 1.47
a[1][i] = a[1][i] + v[1][i]
def fitness(x, y):
return 100 * ((y - (x**2))**2) + ((1 - (x**2))**2)
def Order(Pbest, r, n):
for i in range(1, n):
for j in range(0, n - 1):
if r[j] > r[j + 1]:
#Order the fitness
tempRes = r[j]
r[j] = r[j + 1]
r[j + 1] = tempRes
#Order las X, Y
tempX = Pbest[0][j]
Pbest[0][j] = Pbest[0][j + 1]
Pbest[0][j + 1] = tempX
tempY = Pbest[1][j]
Pbest[1][j] = Pbest[1][j + 1]
Pbest[1][j + 1] = tempY
if '__main__' == main():
main()

computing smooth color map using interpolation recursively

I am computing the mandelbrot set recursively and attempting to perform linear interpolation using the smooth coloring algorithm. However, this returns floating point RGB values which I can't put into the ppm image I am using so I am having to round off using int(), creating a smoother but yet still banded image.
Are there any simpler ways that will produce a better non-banded image?
The second function is an extremely bad hack just playing around with ideas as the smooth algorithim seems to be producing rgb values in the range 256**3
Commented out the linear interpolation I was doing.
Here are my three functions:
def linear_interp(self, color_1, color_2, i):
r = (color_1[0] * (1 - i)) + (color_2[0] * i)
g = (color_1[1] * (1 - i)) + (color_2[1] * i)
b = (color_1[2] * (1 - i)) + (color_2[2] * i)
return (int(abs(r)), int(abs(g)), int(abs(b)))
def mandel(self, x, y, z, iteration = 0):
mod_z = sqrt((z.real * z.real) + (z.imag * z.imag))
#If its not in the set or we have reached the maximum depth
if abs(z) >= 2.00 or iteration == DEPTH:
if iteration == DEPTH:
mu = iteration
else:
mu = iteration + 1 - log(log(mod_z)) / log(2)
else:
mu = 0
z = (z * z) + self.c
self.mandel(x, y, z, iteration + 1)
return mu
def create_image(self):
begin = time.time() #For computing how long it took (start time)
self.rgb.palette = []
for y in range(HEIGHT):
self.rgb.palette.append([]) #Need to create the rows of our ppm
for x in range(WIDTH):
self.c = complex(x * ((self.max_a - self.min_a) / WIDTH) + self.min_a,
y * ((self.max_b - self.min_b) / HEIGHT) + self.min_b)
z = self.c
q = (self.c.real - 0.25)**2 + (self.c.imag * self.c.imag)
x = self.c.real
y2 = self.c.imag * self.c.imag
if not (q*(q + (x - 0.25)) < y2 / 4.0 or (x + 1.0)**2 + y2 <0.0625):
mu = self.mandel(x, y, z, iteration = 0)
rgb = self.linear_interp((255, 255, 0), (55, 55, 0), mu)
self.rgb.palette[y].append(rgb)
else:
self.rgb.palette[y].append((55, 55, 0))
if self.progress_bar != None:
self.progress_bar["value"] = y
self.canvas.update()
The image I am getting is below:

I think this is the culprit:
else:
mu = 0
self.mandel(x, y, z, iteration + 1)
return mu
This isn't passing down the value of mu from the recursive call correctly, so you're getting black for everything that doesn't bottom out after 1 call. Try
else:
...
mu = self.mandel(x, y, z, iteration + 1)
return mu