Develop Reference

Why use an escape sequence instead of a different quote type?

Why would we want to use escape sequence characters like for example in this Python code:
print('It\'s alright.')
Why are we using this backslash to print a single quote when we can accomplish the same by using:
print("it's alright")

This is useful because you can do:
txt = 'in python you can have \'string\' or "string"'
print(txt)

No matter how many different kinds of quote you have, you may still need an escape mechanism now and then. Consider this:
If you want to use Python's "multiline string literal" you have to begin it and end it with a triple quote, which can be either """ or '''.
To put that into a string literal you are going to have to quote ' or ":
a = 'If you want to use Python\'s "multiline string literal" you have to begin it and end it with a triple quote, which can be either """ or \'\'\'.'.
a = "If you want to use Python's \"multiline string literal\" you have to begin it and end it with a triple quote, which can be either \"\"\" or '''."
a = """If you want to use Python's "multiline string literal" you have to begin it and end it with a triple quote, which can be either ""\" or '''."""
Having different quote types is a great programming convenience, making it easier and less error prone to put quotes and apostrophes in the data without having to jump through hoops. But it can't cover every case. If you need to convince yourself of this, experiment with those three lines at a command prompt and see if you can come up with a way to avoid backslashes. You will find you always need at least one.

Without further context, I can only take a guess and say that the person who wrote the first example, didn't know or wasn't aware of the fact that it's possible to use double-quotes "" for string literals in Python.

That's just a matter of style. Some people like to use single quotes to create string literals, and therefore they'll have to escape any single quotes it comes inside of their strings (same for double quotes). The following will raise a SyntaxError:
s = 'It's gonna be alright!'
s = "They used to call me "Big" but I was 4ft!"
So you may ask why they don't use " when their string have single quotes and ' when their string have double quotes? Yes, they can, but there are some unavoidable situations, such as Regex:
regexp = r"["']\w+["']"
Note that they can't use neither single nor double quotes to create the string, since both are present in the Regex. Therefore, they'll need to escape it.

In this case its not needed cuz you have used " " for the print statement.
case1) use: print(" It's alright.")
case2) use: print(' It\'s alright.')
Note the parenthesis used for the print statements.
You cant use ' directly in case2 cuz python would think that the string ends causing a SyntaxError.

In the code
txt = 'It\'s alright.'
you need the backslash(\) so python understands that the second apostrophe is a character of the string. Without the backslash, Python would interpret it as the character used to mark the end of the string.

When you use a ' at the start, python looks for a matching ' and considers whatever is present in between these quotes as a string.
But if you use a ' in the middle of the string, python considers that as the end of the string. And since there is no matching ' for the ' at the end of the string that results in a SyntaxError
The backslash () character is used to escape characters that otherwise have a special meaning, such as newline, backslash itself, or the quote character.
Refer the docs: https://docs.python.org/3/reference/lexical_analysis.html#string-and-bytes-literals

Escape Characters in Regex sub of Markdown Links to HTML Links

I'm trying to convert markdown of something like:
[Board Management](Boards/boardManagement.md)
to something like this using Python:
<a href='#' onclick='requestPage("Boards/boardManagement.md");'>Board Management</a>
I've found code for a re.sub as follows, but the only way I can get it to work is to not include any type of quotes around requestPage and the browser seems to automatically put them in...
filteredPage = re.sub('\[(.+)\]\((.+)\)', r"<a href='#' onclick=requestPage('\2');>\1</a>", pageContent)
where pageContent is the markdown. Though it seems to work, it would seem best to not depend upon the browser to do the autoinsertion, but everytime I try to rewrite it with the quotes in, it doesn't produce the correct results. For example,
filteredPage = re.sub('\[(.+)\]\((.+)\)', r"\1", pageContent)
results in
Board Management
Is there a way to accomplish the desired link with quotes around the onclick function, other than depending upon the browser to do it?

Summary
The problem you're having is that when you escape a quote in a raw string literal (r"..."), the backslash is not removed from the string. To see what I mean, look at what this code outputs:
print( "abc \" def") # abc " def (the backslash is gone)
print(r"abc \" def") # abc \" def (the backslash is in the string)
In most cases, the solution is to use a triple-quoted string:
print( """abc \" def""") # abc " def (this is the same as the first one)
print(r"""abc " def""" ) # abc " def (this is how to get quotes in a raw string)
So your code becomes this:
re.sub(r'\[(.+)\]\((.+)\)',
r"""\1""",
pageContent)
Another option would be to use ' for your string, and put the href attribute in ": you could have something like r'<a href="#" onclick="request...">'.
Explanation
The key to understanding how raw string literals work may be this: if you use a backslash in a raw string literal, it will be included in the string.
Raw string literals are only mostly raw. The one exception is quotations. This lets you include quotation marks in your string. But unlike a regular string, if you escape a quotation in a raw string literal, the backslash will still be in the string.
This is specified in the last paragraph of the section on string literals:
Even in a raw literal, quotes can be escaped with a backslash, but the backslash remains in the result; for example, r"\"" is a valid string literal consisting of two characters: a backslash and a double quote
The solution to your problem is to use a triple-quoted raw string literal and not escape the quote, as shown above.
In more extreme cases, you can use string literal concatenation to help with escaping strings, but this probably isn't a good use case for it. I'd only use it if (a) the string needed to contain both """ and ''', or (b) I was already using string literal concatenation for another reason (like splitting a long string across multiple lines).
And one last thing: You should be using raw string literals for your regular expressions. It isn't necessary for the regex you have here, but it makes it much easier to write (and read) regular expressions, because every backslash is always in the string, so you get to read exactly what the regex engine will read.
More importantly, unrecognized escape sequences (which include \( and \[) are being phased out and will eventually raise a SyntaxError, so if you want your code to keep working in as many future versions of Python as possible, put your regular expressions in raw literals.

python 3: quoting result of random string generation

I'm new to python and things do not always work as I expect... but I am learning, slowly. Here is a case in point. If I randomly create a string via:
thing = ''.join([
random.SystemRandom().choice(
"{}{}{}".format(
string.ascii_letters, string.digits, string.punctuation
)
) for i in range(63)
])
then I could end up with a string with single quotes as well as backslashes. I assume that I should then go through the string and quote the possibly problematic characters. So, for example: if I generate the (short) string:
cs]b77e\IM>&4/,u.s_jr"xmMdHD7a'wrEw(
my instinct tells me that I should quote that into:
cs]b77e\\IM>&4/,u.s_jr"xmMdHD7a\'wrEw(
It looks like the string.replace() method is my friend...
thing = ''.join([
random.SystemRandom().choice(
"{}{}{}".format(
string.ascii_letters, string.digits, string.punctuation
)
) for i in range(63)
]).replace('\\', '\\').replace('\'', '\'')
but is there a better way?
Also, in the replace() methods the meaning of the single quoted strings seems to change depending on context. Coming from Perl this seems strange to me. My initial attempts had me doing things like replace('\\', '\\\\') thinking that I had to quote the characters going into the replacement string. Is this normal or am I missing something else?
Edit
My goal here is to end up with 63 characters in a string. I don't really think that I have to quote any generated single quotes but my thought is that if I later use the string and it has generated backslashes then the next character after the backslash would act like it was quoted, right? I mean:
len('1234')
yields 4 but
len('12\4')
yields 3 so I need to post-process the generated string to at least quote the backslashes, right? Is there a better way to quote problematic characters than a chain of replaces() methods?

A string can contain any valid characters; the quotes and backslashes are only useful or special when representing a string in Python code. So you don't normally need to do anything like this when you already have a string which contains the characters you want.
If you want a representation which can be parsed by Python (e.g. by writing it to a .py file), repr() does that.

You don't have to escape characters unless they are part of code you are writing or from an input from a user. If the backslash character or a quote character is generated by a Python program, then it is already stored as that character in memory. There is no need do any additional escaping.
Why? Because Python is not interpreting a string literal, it is simply generating characters, which are stored as numbers in memory. When you ask Python to display a string containing one of the characters such as a single quote or a backslash, it will automatically escape them.
Here is an example. A double quote is 34, single quote is character 39, and backslash is 92.
'a'+chr(34)+'b'+chr(39)+'c'+chr(92)+'d'
# returns:
'a"b\'c\\d'
Because I included a double quote and a single quote Python will use a single quote to surround the string, an unescaped double quote within the string, an escaped single quote, and and escaped backslash.
So there is no need to escape characters that are generated within a Python program, it does it for you.

With pyparsing, how do you parse a quoted string that ends with a backslash

I'm trying to use pyparsing to parse quoted strings under the following conditions:
The quoted string might contain internal quotes.
I want to use backslashes to escape internal quotes.
The quoted string might end with a backslash.
I'm struggling to define a successful parser. Also, I'm starting to wonder whether the regular expression used by pyparsing for quoted strings of this kind is correct (see my alternative regular expression below).
Am I using pyparsing incorrectly (most likely) or is there a bug in pyparsing?
Here's a script that demonstrates the problem (Note: ignore this script; please focus instead on the Update below.):
import pyparsing as pp
import re
# A single-quoted string having:
# - Internal escaped quote.
# - A backslash as the last character before the final quote.
txt = r"'ab\'cd\'"
# Parse with pyparsing.
# Does not work as expected: grabs only first 3 characters.
parser = pp.QuotedString(quoteChar = "'", escChar = '\\', escQuote = '\\')
toks = parser.parseString(txt)
print
print 'txt: ', txt
print 'pattern:', parser.pattern
print 'toks: ', toks
# Parse with a regex just like the pyparsing pattern, but with
# the last two groups flipped -- which seems more correct to me.
# This works.
rgx = re.compile(r"\'(?:[^'\n\r\\]|(?:\\.)|(?:\\))*\'")
print
print rgx.search(txt).group(0)
Output:
txt: 'ab\'cd\'
pattern: \'(?:[^'\n\r\\]|(?:\\)|(?:\\.))*\'
toks: ["ab'"]
'ab\'cd\'
Update
Thanks for the replies. I suspect that I've confused things by framing my question badly, so let me try again.
Let's say we are trying to parse a language that uses quoting rules generally like Python's. We want users to be able to define strings that can include internal quotes (protected by backslashes) and we want those strings to be able to end with a backslash. Here's an example file in our language. Note that the file would also parse as valid Python syntax, and if we printed foo (in Python), the output would be the literal value: ab'cd\
# demo.txt
foo = 'ab\'cd\\'
My goal is to use pyparsing to parse such a language. Is there a way to do it? The question above is basically where I ended up after several failed attempts. Below is my initial attempt. It fails because there are two backslashes at the end, rather than just one.
with open('demo.txt') as fh:
txt = fh.read().split()[-1].strip()
parser = pp.QuotedString(quoteChar = "'", escChar = '\\')
toks = parser.parseString(txt)
print
print 'txt: ', txt
print 'pattern:', parser.pattern
print 'toks: ', toks # ["ab'cd\\\\"]
I guess the problem is that QuotedString treats the backslash only as a quote-escape whereas Python treats a backslash as a more general-purpose escape.
Is there a simple way to do this that I'm overlooking? One workaround that occurs to me is to use .setParseAction(...) to handle the double-backslashes after the fact -- perhaps like this, which seems to work:
qHandler = lambda s,l,t: [ t[0].replace('\\\\', '\\') ]
parser = pp.QuotedString(quoteChar = "'", escChar = '\\').setParseAction(qHandler)

I think you're misunderstanding the use of escQuote. According to the docs:
escQuote - special quote sequence to escape an embedded quote string (such as SQL's "" to escape an embedded ") (default=None)
So escQuote is for specifying a complete sequence that is parsed as a literal quote. In the example given in the docs, for instance, you would specify escQuote='""' and it would be parsed as ". By specifying a backslash as escQuote, you are causing a single backslash to be interpreted as a quotation mark. You don't see this in your example because you don't escape anything but quotes. However, if you try to escape something else, you'll see it won't work:
>>> txt = r"'a\Bc'"
>>> parser = pyp.QuotedString(quoteChar = "'", escChar = '\\', escQuote = "\\")
>>> parser.parseString(txt)
(["a'Bc"], {})
Notice that the backslash was replaced with '.
As for your alternative, I think the reason that pyparsing (and many other parsers) don't do this is that it involves special-casing one position within the string. In your regex, a single backslash is an escape character everywhere except as the last character in the string, in which position it is treated literally. This means that you cannot tell "locally" whether a given quote is really the end of the string or not --- even if it has a backslash, it might not be the end if there is one later on without a backslash. This can lead to parse ambiguities and surprising parsing behavior. For instance, consider these examples:
>>> txt = r"'ab\'xxxxxxx"
>>> print rgx.search(txt).group(0)
'ab\'
>>> txt = r"'ab\'xxxxxxx'"
>>> print rgx.search(txt).group(0)
'ab\'xxxxxxx'
By adding an apostrophe at the end of the string, I suddenly caused the earlier apostrophe to no longer be the end, and added all the xs to the string at once. In a real-usage context, this can lead to confusing situations in which mismatched quotes silently result in a reparsing of the string rather than a parse error.
Although I can't come up with an example at the moment, I also suspect that this has the possibility to cause "catastrophic backstracking" if you actually try to parse a sizable document containing multiple strings of this type. (This was my point about the "100MB of other text".) Because the parser can't know whether a given \' is the end of the string without parsing further, it might potentially have to go all the way to the end of the file just to make sure there are no more quote marks out there. If that remaining portion of the file contains additional strings of this type, it may become complicated to figure out which quotes are delimiting which strings. For instance, if the input contains something like
'one string \' 'or two'
we can't tell whether this is two valid strings (one string \ and or two) or one with invalid material after it (one string \' and the non-string tokens or two followed by an unmatched quote). This kind of situation is not desirable in many parsing contexts; you want the decisions about where strings begin and end to be locally determinable, and not depend on the occurrence of other tokens much later in the document.

What is it about this code that is not working for you?
from pyparsing import *
s = r"foo = 'ab\'cd\\'" # <--- IMPORTANT - use a raw string literal here
ident = Word(alphas)
strValue = QuotedString("'", escChar='\\')
strAssign = ident + '=' + strValue
results = strAssign.parseString(s)
print results.asList() # displays repr form of each element
for r in results:
print r # displays str form of each element
# count the backslashes
backslash = '\\'
print results[-1].count(backslash)
prints:
['foo', '=', "ab'cd\\\\"]
foo
=
ab'cd\\
2
EDIT:
So "\'" becomes just "'", but "\" is parsed but stays as "\" instead of being an escaped "\". Looks like a bug in QuotedString. For now you can add this workaround:
import re
strValue.setParseAction(lambda t: re.sub(r'\\(.)', r'\g<1>', t[0]))
Which will take every escaped character sequence and just give back the escaped character alone, without the leading '\'.
I'll add this in the next patch release of pyparsing.

PyParsing's QuotedString parser does not handle quoted strings that end with backslashes. This is a fundamental limitation, that doesn't have any easy workaround that I can see. If you want to support that kind of string, you'll need to use something other than QuotedString.
This is not an uncommon limitation either. Python itself does not allow an odd number of backslashes at the end of a "raw" string literal. Try it: r"foo\" will raise an exception, while r"bar\\" will include both backslashes in the output.
The reason you are getting truncated output (rather than an exception) from your current code is because you're passing a backslash as the escQuote parameter. I think that is intended to be an alternative to specifying an escape character, rather than a supplement. What is happening is that the first backslash is being interpreted as an internal quote (which it unescapes), and since it's followed by an actual quote character, the parser thinks it's reached the end of the quoted string. Thus you get ab' as your result.

Defining file paths in python with EOL string literal errors [duplicate]

Technically, any odd number of backslashes, as described in the documentation.
>>> r'\'
File "<stdin>", line 1
r'\'
^
SyntaxError: EOL while scanning string literal
>>> r'\\'
'\\\\'
>>> r'\\\'
File "<stdin>", line 1
r'\\\'
^
SyntaxError: EOL while scanning string literal
It seems like the parser could just treat backslashes in raw strings as regular characters (isn't that what raw strings are all about?), but I'm probably missing something obvious.

The whole misconception about python's raw strings is that most of people think that backslash (within a raw string) is just a regular character as all others. It is NOT. The key to understand is this python's tutorial sequence:
When an 'r' or 'R' prefix is present, a character following a
backslash is included in the string without change, and all
backslashes are left in the string
So any character following a backslash is part of raw string. Once parser enters a raw string (non Unicode one) and encounters a backslash it knows there are 2 characters (a backslash and a char following it).
This way:
r'abc\d' comprises a, b, c, \, d
r'abc\'d' comprises a, b, c, \, ', d
r'abc\'' comprises a, b, c, \, '
and:
r'abc\' comprises a, b, c, \, ' but there is no terminating quote now.
Last case shows that according to documentation now a parser cannot find closing quote as the last quote you see above is part of the string i.e. backslash cannot be last here as it will 'devour' string closing char.

The reason is explained in the part of that section which I highlighted in bold:
String quotes can be escaped with a
backslash, but the backslash remains
in the string; for example, r"\"" is a
valid string literal consisting of two
characters: a backslash and a double
quote; r"\" is not a valid string
literal (even a raw string cannot end
in an odd number of backslashes).
Specifically, a raw string cannot end
in a single backslash (since the
backslash would escape the following
quote character). Note also that a
single backslash followed by a newline
is interpreted as those two characters
as part of the string, not as a line
continuation.
So raw strings are not 100% raw, there is still some rudimentary backslash-processing.

That's the way it is! I see it as one of those small defects in python!
I don't think there's a good reason for it, but it's definitely not parsing; it's really easy to parse raw strings with \ as a last character.
The catch is, if you allow \ to be the last character in a raw string then you won't be able to put " inside a raw string. It seems python went with allowing " instead of allowing \ as the last character.
However, this shouldn't cause any trouble.
If you're worried about not being able to easily write windows folder pathes such as c:\mypath\ then worry not, for, you can represent them as r"C:\mypath", and, if you need to append a subdirectory name, don't do it with string concatenation, for it's not the right way to do it anyway! use os.path.join
>>> import os
>>> os.path.join(r"C:\mypath", "subfolder")
'C:\\mypath\\subfolder'

In order for you to end a raw string with a slash I suggest you can use this trick:
>>> print r"c:\test"'\\'
test\
It uses the implicit concatenation of string literals in Python and concatenates one string delimited with double quotes with another that is delimited by single quotes. Ugly, but works.

Another trick is to use chr(92) as it evaluates to "\".
I recently had to clean a string of backslashes and the following did the trick:
CleanString = DirtyString.replace(chr(92),'')
I realize that this does not take care of the "why" but the thread attracts many people looking for a solution to an immediate problem.

Since \" is allowed inside the raw string. Then it can't be used to identify the end of the string literal.
Why not stop parsing the string literal when you encounter the first "?
If that was the case, then \" wouldn't be allowed inside the string literal. But it is.

The reason for why r'\' is syntactical incorrect is that although the string expression is raw the used quotes (single or double) always have to be escape since they would mark the end of the quote otherwise. So if you want to express a single quote inside single quoted string, there is no other way than using \'. Same applies for double quotes.
But you could use:
'\\'

Another user who has since deleted their answer (not sure if they'd like to be credited) suggested that the Python language designers may be able to simplify the parser design by using the same parsing rules and expanding escaped characters to raw form as an afterthought (if the literal was marked as raw).
I thought it was an interesting idea and am including it as community wiki for posterity.

Naive raw strings
The naive idea of a raw string is
If I put an r in front of a pair of quotes,
I can put whatever I want between the quotes
and it will mean itself.
Unfortunately, this does not work, because if the whatever
happens to contain a quote, the raw string would end at that point.
It is simply impossible that I can put "whatever I want"
between fixed delimiters, because some of it could look like
the terminating delimiter -- no matter what that delimiter is.
Real-world raw strings (variant 1)
One possible approach to this problem would be to say
If I put an r in front of a pair of quotes,
I can put whatever I want between the quotes
as long as it does not contain a quote
and it will mean itself.
This restriction sounds harsh, until one recognizes that
Python's large offering of quotes can accommodate most situations
with this rule. The following are all valid Python quotes:
'
"
'''
"""
With this many possibilities for the delimiter, almost anything
can be made to work.
About the only exception would be if the string
literal is supposed to contain a complete list of all allowed
Python quotes.
Real-world raw strings (variant 2, as in Python)
Python, however, takes a different route using
an extended version of the above rule.
It effectively states
If I put an r in front of a pair of quotes,
I can put whatever I want between the quotes
as long as it does not contain a quote
and it will mean itself.
If I insist on including a quote, even that is allowed,
but I have to put a backslash before it.
So the Python approach is, in a sense, even more liberal
than variant 1 above -- but it has the side effect of
"mis"interpreting the closing quote as part of the string
if the last intended character of the string is a backslash.
Variant 2 is not helpful:
If I want the quote in my string,
but not the backslash, the allowed version of my string literal
will not be what I need.
However, given the three different other kinds of quotes I have
at my disposal, I will probably just pick one of those and my
problem will be solved -- so this is not problematic case.
The problematic case is this one:
If I want my string to end with a backslash, I am at a loss.
I need to resort to concatenating a non-raw string literal
containing the backslash.
Conclusion
After writing this, I go with several of the other posters
that variant 1 would have been easier to understand and to accept
and therefore more pythonic. That's life!

Comming from C it pretty clear to me that a single \ works as escape character allowing you to put special characters such as newlines, tabs and quotes into strings.
That does indeed disallow \ as last character since it will escape the " and make the parser choke. But as pointed out earlier \ is legal.

some tips :
1) if you need to manipulate backslash for path then standard python module os.path is your friend. for example :
os.path.normpath('c:/folder1/')
2) if you want to build strings with backslash in it BUT without backslash at the END of your string then raw string is your friend (use 'r' prefix before your literal string). for example :
r'\one \two \three'
3) if you need to prefix a string in a variable X with a backslash then you can do this :
X='dummy'
bs=r'\ ' # don't forget the space after backslash or you will get EOL error
X2=bs[0]+X # X2 now contains \dummy
4) if you need to create a string with a backslash at the end then combine tip 2 and 3 :
voice_name='upper'
lilypond_display=r'\DisplayLilyMusic \ ' # don't forget the space at the end
lilypond_statement=lilypond_display[:-1]+voice_name
now lilypond_statement contains "\DisplayLilyMusic \upper"
long live python ! :)
n3on

Despite its role, even a raw string cannot end in a single
backslash, because the backslash escapes the following quote
character—you still must escape the surrounding quote character to
embed it in the string. That is, r"...\" is not a valid string
literal—a raw string cannot end in an odd number of backslashes.
If you need to end a raw string with a single backslash, you can use
two and slice off the second.

Given the confusion around the arbitrary-seeming restriction against an odd number of backslashes at the end of a Python raw-string, it's fair to say that this is a design mistake or legacy issue originating in a desire to have a simpler parser.
While workarounds (such as r'C:\some\path' '\\' yielding 'C:\\some\\path\\' (in Python notation) or C:\some\path\ (verbatim)) are simple, it's counterintuitive to be needing them. For comparison, let's have a look at C++ and Perl.
In C++, we can straightforwardly use raw string literal syntax
#include <iostream>
int main() {
std::cout << R"(Hello World!)" << std::endl;
std::cout << R"(Hello World!\)" << std::endl;
std::cout << R"(Hello World!\\)" << std::endl;
std::cout << R"(Hello World!\\\)" << std::endl;
}
to get the following output:
Hello World!
Hello World!\
Hello World!\\
Hello World!\\\
If we want to use the closing delimiter (above: )) within the string literal, we can even extend the syntax in an ad-hoc way to R"delimiterString(quotedMaterial)delimiterString". For example, R"asdf(some random delimiters: ( } [ ] { ) < > just for fun)asdf" produces the string some random delimiters: ( } [ ] { ) < > just for fun in the output. (Ain't that a good use of "asdf"!)
In Perl, this code
my $str = q{This is a test.\\};
print ($str);
print ("This is another test.\n");
will output the following: This is a test.\This is another test.
Replacing the first line by
my $str = q{This is a test.\};
would lead to an error message: Can't find string terminator "}" anywhere before EOF at main.pl line 1.
However, Perl treating a pre-delimiter \ as an escape character doesn't prevent the user from having an odd number of backslashes at the end of the resulting string; eg to place 3 backslashes \\\ into the end of $str, simply end the code with 6 backslashes: my $str = q{This is a test.\\\\\\};. Importantly, while we need to double the backslashes in the input, there is no Python-like inconsistent-seeming syntactic restriction.
Another way of looking at things is that these 3 languages use different ways to address the parsing issue of interaction between escape characters and closing delimiters:
Python: disallows an odd number of backslashes just before the closing delimiter; a simple workaround is r'stringWithoutFinalBackslash' '\\'
C++: allows essentially¹ everything between the delimiters
Perl: allows essentially² everything between the delimiters, but backslashes need to be consistently doubled
¹ The custom delimiterString itself cannot be more than 16 characters long, but that's hardly a limitation.
² If you need the delimiter itself, just escape it with \.
However, to be fair in a comparison to Python, we need to acknowledge that (1) C++ didn't have such string literals until C++11 and is famously hard to parse and (2) Perl is even harder to parse.

I encountered this problem and found a partial solution which is good for some cases. Despite python not being able to end a string with a single backslash, it can be serialized and saved in a text file with a single backslash at the end. Therefore if what you need is saving a text with a single backslash on you computer, it is possible:
x = 'a string\\'
x
'a string\\'
# Now save it in a text file and it will appear with a single backslash:
with open("my_file.txt", 'w') as h:
h.write(x)
BTW it is not working with json if you dump it using python's json library.
Finally, I work with Spyder, and I noticed that if I open the variable in spider's text editor by double clicking on its name in the variable explorer, it is presented with a single backslash and can be copied to the clipboard that way (it's not very helpful for most needs but maybe for some..).