I need to write a script in python to check a webpage, which is protected by kerberos. Is there any possibility to do this from within python and how? The script is going to be deployed on a linux environment with python 2.4.something installed.
dertoni
I think that python-krbV and most Linux distributions also have a python-kerberos package. For example, Debian has one of the same name. Here's the documentation on it
Extract from link:
"This Python package is a high-level wrapper for Kerberos (GSSAPI)
operations. The goal is to avoid having to build a module that wraps
the entire Kerberos.framework, and instead offer a limited set of
functions that do what is needed for client/server Kerberos
authentication based on http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4559.txt. "
Related
I'm building a website with React and Firebase that utilizes an algorithm I wrote in python. The database and authentication for the project are both handled by Firebase, so I would like to keep the cloud functions in that same ecosystem if possible.
Right now, I'm using the python-shell npm package to send and receive data from NodeJS to my python script.
I have local unit testing set up so I can test the https.onCall functions locally without needing to deploy and test from the client.
When I am testing locally, everything works perfectly.
However, when I push the functions to the cloud and trigger the function from the client, the logs in the Firebase console show that the python script is missing dependencies.
What is the best way to ensure that the script has all the dependencies available to it up on the server?
I have tried:
-Copying the actual dependency folders from my library/.../site-packages and putting them in the same directory under the /functions folder with the python script. This almost works. I just run into an issue with numpy: "No module named 'numpy.core._multiarray_umath'" is printed to the logs in Firebase.
I apologize if this is an obvious answer. I'm new to Python, and the solutions I've found online seem way to elaborate or involve hosting the python code in another ecosystem (like AWS or Heroku). I am especially hesitant to go to all that work because it runs fine locally. If I can just find a way to send the dependencies up with the script I'm good to go.
Please let me know if you need any more information.
the logs in the Firebase console show that the python script is missing dependencies.
That's because the nodejs runtime targeted by the Firebase CLI doesn't have everything you need to run python programs.
If you need to run a function that's primarily written in python, you should not use the Firebase CLI and instead uses the Google Cloud tools to target the python runtime, which should do everything you want. Yes, it might be extra work for you to learn new tools, and you will not be able to use the Firebase CLI, but it will be the right way to run python in Cloud Functions.
Can I use any external libraries that are developed for python on Pyramid?
I mean is it the 'normal python' to which I can import external libraries as I do with the standard python downloaded from python.org
What is the situation for Django and Flask and Bottle?
My intention is to create backend for a mobile app. I want to do it specifically in Python because I need to learn python.
The app is a native android app. Therefore the there is no need to use response with nice html code.
I just want Django/Flask/Pyramid to direct http request to relevant python functions. Everything else including user auth, database is handled by my code I write. Is there a better more simpler way to map http request/responses with the relevant functions without using these 3 platforms?
In case I use one of these can I still use my own libraries?
Yes, all of those frameworks are simply running Python code to handle requests. Within limits you can use external libraries just fine.
The limits usually are dictated by the WSGI server and the nature of HTTP requests; if your library changes the event model (like gevents) or relies heavily on changing the interpreter state (global state, localization) or takes a long,long time to produce results, then you may need to do more work to integrate.
I'm building an app that needs to get artwork information out of the libspotify Spotify API.
I'm building the app in python on google appengine. Does anyone know of a package that will enable me to access the libspotify API? The official page is C and I've googled around to try and find a suitable wrapper but can't seem to find one.
Thanks
Tom
There is also https://github.com/mopidy/pyspotify which is actively used in some applications and up to date.
I don't think you will be able to call libspotify at all. From the docs:
"The Python interpreter runs in a secured "sandbox" environment to isolate your application for service and security. The interpreter can run any Python code, including Python modules you include with your application, as well as the Python standard library. The interpreter cannot load Python modules with C code; it is a "pure" Python environment."
Check Spotimeta
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/spotimeta/
what is the advantage of using a python virtualbox API instead of using XPCOM?
The advantage is that pyvb is lot easier to work with.
On the contrary the documentation for the python API of XPCOM doesn't exist, and the API is not pythonic at all. You can't do introspection to find methods/attributes of an object, etc. So you have to check the C++ source to find how it works or some python scripts already written (like vboxshell.py and VBoxWebSrv.py).
On the other hand pyvb is really just python wrapper that call VirtuaBoxManager on the command line. I don't know if it's a real disadvantage or not?
I would generally recommend against either one. If you need to use virtualization programmatically, take a look at libvirt, which gives you cross platform and cross hypervisor support; which lets you do kvm/xen/vz/vmware later on.
That said, the SOAP api is using two extra abstraction layers (the client and server side of the HTTP transaction), which is pretty clearly then just calling the XPCOM interface.
If you need local host only support, use XPCOM. The extra indirection of libvirt/SOAP doesn't help you.
If you need to access virtualbox on a various hosts across multiple client machines, use SOAP or libvirt
If you want cross platform support, or to run your code on Linux, use libvirt.
From sun's site on VirtualBox python APIs:
SOAP allows to control remote VMs over
HTTP, while XPCOM is much more
high-performing and exposes certain
functionality not available with SOAP.
They use very different technologies
(SOAP is procedural, while XPCOM is
OOP), but as it is ultimately API to
the same functionality of the
VirtualBox, we kept in bindings
original semantics, so other that
connection establishment, code could
be written in such a way that people
may not care what communication
channel with VirtualBox instance is
used.
From that article, I'm having trouble seeing the difference between "python virtualbox API" and "XPCOM". Could you provide a link to the API you're thinking of?
I want to provide my colleagues with an interface (using Windows Forms or WPF) to control the states of virtual machines (KVM based) on a linux host. On the command line of this server, I'm using a tool, called libvirt, which provides python bindings to access its functionality.
What whould be the best pratice to remotely access several function like libvirt or reading logfiles on the server. I thought about a REST Full Webservice generated by Python. Are there other viable options to consider?
Thanks,
Henrik
I'd develop an intranet web application, using any python web framework of choice.
That way you don't have to develop/install software on your client. They just point the browser and it works.
Because you are using a server-side tool that has Python bindings, you should give a serious look at PYRO which is a Python RPC library.
http://pyro.sourceforge.net/
To use this you would also have to use Python on the client, but that shouldn't be a problem. If you haven't start writing your client, then you could do it all in IronPython. Or, if you need to add this to an already existing client, then you could still bind in either IronPython or CPython as an embedded scripting engine.
For more on PYRO and Ironpython, see this wiki page http://www.razorvine.net/python/PyroAndIronpython
Proxmox VE is a complete solution to manage KVM (and OpenVZ) based virtual machines, including a comprehensive web console, so maybe you can get a full solution without developing anything?