In Python for Symbian60 blit() is defined as:
blit(image [,target=(0,0), source=((0,0),image.size), mask=None, scale=0 ])
In the optional parameter source what is the significance of image.size?
My guess is that blit() will automatically use the result of image.size when you don't specify anything else (and thus blitting the whole image from (0,0) to (width,height)).
If you want only a smaller part of the image copied, you can use the source parameter to define a different rectangle to copy.
Think that source=((0,0)) is the top left corner and image.size is the bottom right corner. You blit whatever is between those two points.
Similar for target, btw.
Related
This is just a quick question regarding sprites in PyGame, I have my image loaded as in the code below, and I'm just wondering how to display the sprite in PyGame like drawing a rectangle or circle. I don't want to have it behave in anyway. I think I use a blit command, but I'm not sure and I'm not finding much online.
Here's my image code for loading it.
Star = pygame.image.load('WhiteStar.png').convert_alpha()
You could just provide an outline for loading a sprite. I simply want to display it.
Use blit to draw an image. Actually blit draws one Surface onto another. Hence you need to blit the image onto the Surface associated to the display.
You need to specify the position where the image is blit on the target. The position can be specified by a pair of coordinates that define the top left position. Or it can be specified by a rectangle, only taking into account the top left point of the rectangle:
screen = pygame.dispaly.set_mode((width, height))
star = pygame.image.load('WhiteStar.png').convert_alpha()
# [...]
while run:
# [...]
screen.blit(star, (x, y))
# [...]
Use a pygame.Rect when you want to place the center of a surface at a specific point. pygame.Surface.get_rect.get_rect() returns a rectangle with the size of the Surface object, that always starts at (0, 0) since a Surface object has no position. The position of the rectangle can be specified by a keyword argument. For example, the center of the rectangle can be specified with the keyword argument center. These keyword argument are applied to the attributes of the pygame.Rect before it is returned (see pygame.Rect for a full list of the keyword arguments):
screen.blit(star, star.get_rect(center = (x, y)))
I'm trying to implement Object Tracker using OpenCV and I'm new to Python. I'll call it from C# code via IronPython. What I'm trying to do, I want to set a custom rectangle as a parameter to Tracker instead of selecting it by mouse.
(Tracker code is the common example you can find on the internet)
Here is the problematic part :
This is how I set and create a rectangle
initBB = cv2.rectangle(frame ,(154, 278),(173,183), (0, 255, 00),1)
This is Tracker's init method
tracker.init(frame, initBB)
and this is the error
SystemError: new style getargs format but argument is not a tuple
If I wanted to use "normal" way, initBB set would be like
initBB = cv2.selectROI("Frame", frame, fromCenter=False,
showCrosshair=False)
I couldn't see which part I'm doing wrong, am I trying to set the wrong type of object to initBB or setting it in wrong way?
Thanks! Have a nice day!
Your error comes from a misunderstanding of what cv2.rectangle does.
It doesn't return a rectangle as you imagine. It is actually a drawing function. It draws the rectangle on the image you pass as argument and returns None.
A rectangle is just a tuple in Python with the following coordinates: (start_col, start_row, width, height). You can create it without using an OpenCV function.
I've been wondering this for a while, why can't I make 1x1 rects in Pygame? There are no errors. It doesn't display. If I switch it to 2x2, it displays fine. (And no, it is not my eyesight.)
According to the pygame docs, the area covered by a Rect does not include the right- and bottom-most edge of pixels. If one Rect’s bottom border is another Rect’s top border (i.e., rect1.bottom==rect2.top), the two meet exactly on the screen but do not overlap, and rect1.colliderect(rect2) returns false. (formatting mine)
In context, this means that, since rect1.bottom == rect1.top, rect1.colliderect(rect1) == false, so the rect is empty.
I'm using pygame for image editing (not displaying). (Yes, I know there are other options like PIL/pillow, but pygame should work for this.)
I want to draw and save an image where I'm individually setting the alpha values of each pixel according to a formula (I'm drawing a complicated RGBA profile). It seems that pixels_alpha is the right way to do this. But when I change pixels_alpha it's ignored, the image just stays transparent. Here's my code...
import pygame as pg
import os
def init_transparent(img_width, img_height):
"""
Create a new surface with width and height, starting with transparent
background. This part works!
"""
os.environ['SDL_VIDEODRIVER'] = 'dummy'
pg.init()
pg.display.init()
# next command enables alpha
# see http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14948711/
pg.display.set_mode((img_width, img_height), 0, 32)
# pg.SRCALPHA is a flag that turns on per-pixel alpha.
return pg.Surface((img_width, img_height), pg.SRCALPHA)
def make_semitransparent_image():
surf = init_transparent(20, 20)
# alphas should be a direct reference to the alpha data in surf
alphas = pg.surfarray.pixels_alpha(surf)
# alphas is a uint8-dtype numpy array. Right now it's all zeros.
for i in range(20):
for j in range(20):
# Since pixels_alpha gave me a uint8 array, I infer that
# alpha=255 means opaque. (Right?)
alphas[i,j] = 200
pg.image.save(surf, '/home/steve/Desktop/test.png')
make_semitransparent_image()
Again, it saves an image but the image looks completely transparent, no matter what value I set alphas to. What am I doing wrong here? (Using Python 2.7, pygame 1.9.1release.) (Thanks in advance!)
The Pygame docs say that pixels_array() locks the surface as long as the resulting array exists, and that locked surface may not be drawn correctly. It seems to be the case that they are not saved correctly, too. You need to throw away the alphas surfarray object before calling image.save(). This can be done by adding del alphas just before image.save().
(Note that this is more a workaround than a proper fix. Adding del alphas can only have a reliable effect only on CPython (and not PyPy, Jython, IronPython). Maybe you can really "close" a surfarray objects, the same way you can either close a file or merely forget about it?)
Simple question, but I've tried a few things and nothing seems to work.
I want to overlay some statistics onto a 3d VTK scene, using 2D vtkTextActors. This works fine, but the text is at times difficult to see, depending on what appears behind it in the 3D scene.
For this reason, I'd like to add a 2d, semi-transparent "box" behind my text actors to provide a darker background.
Which VTK object is appropriate for this? I've tried so far:
vtkLegendBoxActor: Not what I want, but I can use this with no text to display a semi-transparent box on screen. I cannot size it directly and I get warnings about not initialising some of the content.
vtkImageData: Tried manually creating image data and adding it to the scene; I believe it was placed within the 3d scene and not used as an overlay. If that's not the case then I couldn't get it to show at all.
vtkCornerAnnotation: Scales with window size, is fixed to a corner and the background opacity cannot be set AFAIK.
vtkTextActor: Cannot set a background color or opacity
Can anyone tell me how they might achieve what I'm after in VTK?
I've found a way to do this with vtkPolyMapper2D which seems to work okay. It seems to be a very stupid way to do this. If there is something more elegant, I'm all ears.
import vtk
extents = [[0,0],[620,0],[620,220],[0,220]]
polyPoints = vtk.vtkPoints()
for x, y in extents:
polyPoints.InsertNextPoint(x, y, 0)
num_corners = len(extents)
polyCells = vtk.vtkCellArray()
polyCells.InsertNextCell(num_corners + 1)
for i in range(0, num_corners):
polyCells.InsertCellPoint(i)
polyCells.InsertCellPoint(0) ## Rejoin at the end
poly_profile = vtk.vtkPolyData()
poly_profile.SetPoints(polyPoints)
poly_profile.SetPolys(polyCells) ## Goes solid
cut_triangles = vtk.vtkTriangleFilter()
cut_triangles.SetInput(poly_profile)
_poly_mapper = vtk.vtkPolyDataMapper2D()
_poly_mapper.SetInput(poly_profile)
_poly_mapper.SetInputConnection(cut_triangles.GetOutputPort())
_actor = vtk.vtkActor2D()
_actor.SetMapper(_poly_mapper)
_actor.GetProperty().SetColor([0.1,0.1,0.1])
_actor.GetProperty().SetOpacity(0.5)
#Add to renderer as normal
just use vtktexture, vtkimagedata & add your own image as texture background to the vtkrenderer by reducing the opacity like a watermark. thats it