I have DATA on x and y axes and the output is on z
for example
y = 10
x = [1,2,3,4,5,6]
z = [2.3,3.4,5.6,7.8,9.6,11.2]
y = 20
x = [1,2,3,4,5,6]
z = [4.3,5.4,7.6,9.8,11.6,13.2]
y = 30
x = [1,2,3,4,5,6]
z = [6.3,7.4,8.6,10.8,13.6,15.2]
how can i find the value of z when y = 15 x = 3.5
I was trying to use scipy but i am very new at it
Thanks a lot for the help
vibhor
scipy.interpolate.bisplrep
Reference:
http://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/generated/scipy.interpolate.bisplrep.html
import scipy
import math
import numpy
from scipy import interpolate
x= [1,2,3,4,5,6]
y= [10,20,30]
Y = numpy.array([[i]*len(x) for i in y])
X = numpy.array([x for i in y])
Z = numpy.array([[2.3,3.4,5.6,7.8,9.6,11.2],
[4.3,5.4,7.6,9.8,11.6,13.2],
[6.3,7.4,8.6,10.8,13.6,15.2]])
tck = interpolate.bisplrep(X,Y,Z)
print interpolate.bisplev(3.5,15,tck)
7.84921875
EDIT:
Upper solution does not give you perfect fit.
check
print interpolate.bisplev(x,y,tck)
[[ 2.2531746 4.2531746 6.39603175]
[ 3.54126984 5.54126984 7.11269841]
[ 5.5031746 7.5031746 8.78888889]
[ 7.71111111 9.71111111 10.9968254 ]
[ 9.73730159 11.73730159 13.30873016]
[ 11.15396825 13.15396825 15.2968254 ]]
to overcome this interpolate whit polyinomials of 5rd degree in x and 2nd degree in y direction
tck = interpolate.bisplrep(X,Y,Z,kx=5,ky=2)
print interpolate.bisplev(x,y,tck)
[[ 2.3 4.3 6.3]
[ 3.4 5.4 7.4]
[ 5.6 7.6 8.6]
[ 7.8 9.8 10.8]
[ 9.6 11.6 13.6]
[ 11.2 13.2 15.2]]
This yield
print interpolate.bisplev(3.5,15,tck)
7.88671875
Plotting:
reference http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/examples/mplot3d/surface3d_demo.html
fig = plt.figure()
ax = Axes3D(fig)
ax.plot_surface(X, Y, Z,rstride=1, cstride=1, cmap=cm.jet)
plt.show()
Given (not as Python code, since the second assignment would obliterate the first in each case, of course;-):
y = 10
x = [1,2,3,4,5,6]
z = [2.3,3.4,5.6,7.8,9.6,11.2]
y = 20
x = [1,2,3,4,5,6]
z = [4.3,5.4,7.6,9.8,11.6,13.2]
you ask: "how can i find the value of z when y = 15 x = 3.5"?
Since you're looking at a point exactly equidistant in both x and y from the given "grid", you just take the midpoint between the grid values (if you had values not equidistant, you'd take a proportional midpoint, see later). So for y=10, the z values for x 3 and 4 are 5.6 and 7.8, so for x 3.5 you estimate their midpoint, 6.7; and similarly for y=20 you estimate the midpoint between 7.6 and 9.8, i.e., 8.7. Finally, since you have y=15, the midpoint between 6.7 and 8.7 is your final interpolated value for z: 7.7.
Say you had y=13 and x=3.8 instead. Then for x you'd take the values 80% of the way, i.e.:
for y=10, 0.2*5.6+0.8*7.8 -> 7.36
for y=20, 0.2*7.6+0.8*9.8 -> 9.46
Now you want the z 30% of the way between these, 0.3*7.36 + 0.7*9.46 -> 8.83, that's z.
This is linear interpolation, and it's really very simple. Do you want to compute it by hand, or find routines that do it for you (given e.g. numpy arrays as "the grids")? Even in the latter case, I hope this "manual" explanation (showing what you're doing in the most elementary of arithmetical terms) can help you understand what you're doing...;-).
There are more advanced forms of interpolation, of course -- do you need those, or does linear interpolation suffice for your use case?
I would say just take the average of the values around it. So if you need X=3.5 and Y=15 (3.5,15), you average (3,10), (3,20), (4,10) and (4,20). Since I have no idea what the data is you are dealing with, I am not sure if the exact proximity would matter - in which case you can just stick w/the average - or if you need to do some sort of inverse distance weighting.
Related
I have the following boundary conditions for a time series in python.
The notation I use here is t_x, where x describe the time in milliseconds (this is not my code, I just thought this notation is good to explain my issue).
t_0 = 0
t_440 = -1.6
t_830 = 0
mean_value = -0.6
I want to create a list that contains 83 values (so the spacing is 10ms for each value).
The list should descibe a "curve" that starts at zero, has the minimum value of -1.6 at 440ms (so 44 in the list), ends with 0 at 880ms (so 83 in the list) and the overall mean value of the list should be -0.6.
I absolutely could not come up with an idea how to "fit" the boundaries to create such a list.
I would really appreciate help.
It is a quick and dirty approach, but it works:
X = list(range(0, 830 +1, 10))
Y = [0.0 for x in X]
Y[44] = -1.6
b = 12.3486
for x in range(44):
Y[x] = -1.6*(b*x+x**2)/(b*44+44**2)
for x in range(83, 44, -1):
Y[x] = -1.6*(b*(83-x)+(83-x)**2)/(b*38+38**2)
print(f'{sum(Y)/len(Y)=:8.6f}, {Y[0]=}, {Y[44]=}, {Y[83]=}')
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
plt.plot(X,Y)
plt.show()
With the code giving following output:
sum(Y)/len(Y)=-0.600000, Y[0]=-0.0, Y[44]=-1.6, Y[83]=-0.0
And showing following diagram:
The first step in coming up with the above approach was to create a linear sloping 'curve' from the minimum to the zeroes. I turned out that linear approach gives here too large mean Y value what means that the 'curve' must have a sharp peak at its minimum and need to be approached with a polynomial. To make things simple I decided to use quadratic polynomial and approach the minimum from left and right side separately as the curve isn't symmetric. The b-value was found by trial and error and its precision can be increased manually or by writing a small function finding it in an iterative way.
Update providing a generic solution as requested in a comment
The code below provides a
meanYboundaryXY(lbc = [(0,0), (440,-1.6), (830,0), -0.6], shape='saw')
function returning the X and Y lists of the time series data calculated from the passed parameter with the boundary values:
def meanYboundaryXY(lbc = [(0,0), (440,-1.6), (830,0), -0.6]):
lbcXY = lbc[0:3] ; meanY_boundary = lbc[3]
minX = min(x for x,y in lbcXY)
maxX = max(x for x,y in lbcXY)
minY = lbc[1][1]
step = 10
X = list(range(minX, maxX + 1, step))
lenX = len(X)
Y = [None for x in X]
sumY = 0
for x, y in lbcXY:
Y[x//step] = y
sumY += y
target_sumY = meanY_boundary*lenX
if shape == 'rect':
subY = (target_sumY-sumY)/(lenX-3)
for i, y in enumerate(Y):
if y is None:
Y[i] = subY
elif shape == 'saw':
peakNextY = 2*(target_sumY-sumY)/(lenX-1)
iYleft = lbc[1][0]//step-1
iYrght = iYleft+2
iYstart = lbc[0][0] // step
iYend = lbc[2][0] // step
for i in range(iYstart, iYleft+1, 1):
Y[i] = peakNextY * i / iYleft
for i in range(iYend, iYrght-1, -1):
Y[i] = peakNextY * (iYend-i)/(iYend-iYrght)
else:
raise ValueError( str(f'meanYboundaryXY() EXIT, {shape=} not in ["saw","rect"]') )
return (X, Y)
X, Y = meanYboundaryXY()
print(f'{sum(Y)/len(Y)=:8.6f}, {Y[0]=}, {Y[44]=}, {Y[83]=}')
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
plt.plot(X,Y)
plt.show()
The code outputs:
sum(Y)/len(Y)=-0.600000, Y[0]=0, Y[44]=-1.6, Y[83]=0
and creates following two diagrams for shape='rect' and shape='saw':
As an old geek, i try to solve the question with a simple algorithm.
First calculate points as two symmetric lines from 0 to 44 and 44 to 89 (orange on the graph).
Calculate sum except middle point and its ratio with sum of points when mean is -0.6, except middle point.
Apply ratio to previous points except middle point. (blue curve on the graph)
Obtain curve which was called "saw" by Claudio.
For my own, i think quadratic interpolation of Claudio is a better curve, but needs trial and error loops.
import matplotlib
# define goals
nbPoints = 89
msPerPoint = 10
midPoint = nbPoints//2
valueMidPoint = -1.6
meanGoal = -0.6
def createSerieLinear():
# two lines 0 up to 44, 44 down to 88 (89 values centered on 44)
serie=[0 for i in range(0,nbPoints)]
interval =valueMidPoint/midPoint
for i in range(0,midPoint+1):
serie[i]=i*interval
serie[nbPoints-1-i]=i*interval
return serie
# keep an original to plot
orange = createSerieLinear()
# work on a base
base = createSerieLinear()
# total except midPoint
totalBase = (sum(base)-valueMidPoint)
#total goal except 44
totalGoal = meanGoal*nbPoints - valueMidPoint
# apply ratio to reduce
reduceRatio = totalGoal/totalBase
for i in range(0,midPoint):
base[i] *= reduceRatio
base[nbPoints-1-i] *= reduceRatio
# verify
meanBase = sum(base)/nbPoints
print("new mean:",meanBase)
# draw
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
X =[i*msPerPoint for i in range(0,nbPoints)]
plt.plot(X,base)
plt.plot(X,orange)
plt.show()
new mean: -0.5999999999999998
Hope you enjoy simple things :)
I'm new to python and trying to plot a gaussian distribution having the function defined as
I plotted normal distribution P(x,y) and it's giving correct output. code and output are below.
Code :
Output :
Now I need to plot a conditional distribution and the output should like . to do this I need to define a boundary condition for the equation. I tried to define a boundary condition but it's not working. the code which I tried is but it's giving wrong output
please help me how to plot the same.
Thanks,
You used the boundary condition on the wrong parameter, try to do it after creating the grid points.
R = np.arange(-4, 4, 0.1)
X, Y = np.meshgrid(R, R)
then validate X and Y based on the condition
valid_xy = np.sqrt(X**2+Y**2) >= 1
X = X[valid_xy]
Y = Y[valid_xy]
Then continue with the rest of the code.
Update
If you want just to reset values around the peak to zero, you can use the following code:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
R = np.arange(-4, 4, 0.1)
X, Y = np.meshgrid(R, R)
Z = np.sum(np.exp(-0.5*(X**2+Y**2)))
P = (1/Z)*np.exp(-0.5*(X**2+Y**2))
# reset the peak
invalid_xy = (X**2+Y**2)<1
P[invalid_xy] = 0
# plot the result
fig = plt.figure(figsize=(10, 6))
ax = fig.add_subplot(111, projection='3d')
ax.scatter(X, Y, P, s=0.5, alpha=0.5)
plt.show()
You can't use np.meshgrid anymore because it will output a matrix where the coordinates of X and Y form a grid (hence its name) and not a custom shape (a grid minus a disc like you want):
However you can create your custom grid the following way:
R = np.arange(-,4,0.1)
xy_coord = np.array(((x,y) for x in R for y in R if (x*x + y*y) > 1))
X,Y = xy_coord.transpose()
X
# array([ 0. , 0. , 0. , ..., 3.9, 3.9, 3.9])
Y
# array([ 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, ..., 3.7, 3.8, 3.9])
I want to interpolate some 3-d data using the scipy LinearNDInterpolator function (Python 2.7). I can't quite figure out how to use it, though: below is my attempt. I'm getting the error ValueError: different number of values and points. This leads me to believe that the shape of "coords" is not appropriate for these data, but it looks in the documentation like the shape is okay.
Note that in the data I really want to use (instead of this example) the spacing of my grid is irregular, so something like RegularGridInterpolator will not do the trick.
Thanks very much for your help!
def f(x,y,z):
return 2 * x**3 + 3 * y**2 - z
x = np.linspace(1,2,2)
y = np.linspace(1,2,2)
z = np.linspace(1,2,2)
data = f(*np.meshgrid(x, y, z, indexing='ij', sparse=True))
coords = np.zeros((len(x),len(y),len(z),3))
coords[...,0] = x.reshape((len(x),1,1))
coords[...,1] = y.reshape((1,len(y),1))
coords[...,2] = z.reshape((1,1,len(z)))
coords = coords.reshape(data.size,3)
my_interpolating_function = LinearNDInterpolator(coords,data)
pts = np.array([[2.1, 6.2, 8.3], [3.3, 5.2, 7.1]])
print(my_interpolating_function(pts))
How can I create a mesh with refinement, lets say x and y go from 0 to 1 and between 0.4 and 0.6 in both directions I want the points to be closer.
I have been reading about numpy.logspace, but it doesnt allow much freedom.
Any ideas?
There isn't one specific command with this functionality, but you can build arrays up with numpy.concatenate this way:
import numpy
start = 0
end = 1
bigstep = 0.1
refinedstart = 0.4
refinedend = 0.6
smallstep = 0.01
x = numpy.concatenate([numpy.arange(start, refinedstart, bigstep),
numpy.arange(refinedstart, refinedend, smallstep),
numpy.arange(refinedend, end, bigstep)])
It depends on how you want to "squash" the middle values. But say you want to do it quadratically, using an 11-by-11 grid spanning from -10 to 10 on each axis:
a = np.linspace(-np.sqrt(10), np.sqrt(10), 11)
b = np.sign(a)*a**2
x, y = np.meshgrid(b, b)
To see what this grid looks like:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
plt.plot(x.flatten(), y.flatten(), '*')
plt.show()
So I am trying to program a bezier curve using python, and unlike previously posts I have been able to find, I need to program It in such a way, that the summation adjust for how many splines there is, since I need to be able to remove or add splines.
I am basing my programming on this wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B%C3%A9zier_curve right after the headline "Explicit definition"
so far this is what I have made
from __future__ import division
import math
import numpy as np
from pylab import*
fact = math.factorial
def binormal(n,i):
koef = fact(n)/float((fact(i)*fact(n-i)))
return koef
def bernstein(n,i,t):
bern = binormal(n,i)*(1-t)**(n-i)*(t**i)
return bern
f = open('polaerekoordinator.txt','r')
whole_thing = f.read().splitlines()
f.close() #these are the coordinates I'm am trying to use for now
#0.000 49.3719597
#9.0141211 49.6065178
#20.2151089 50.9161568
#32.8510895 51.3330612
#44.5151596 45.5941772
#50.7609444 35.3062477
#51.4409332 23.4890251
#49.9188042 11.8336229
#49.5664711 0.000
alle = []
for entry in whole_thing:
alle.append(entry.split(" "))
def bezier(t): #where t is how many points there is on the bezier curve
n = len(alle)
x = y = 0
for i,entry in enumerate(alle):
x +=float(entry[0])*bernstein(n,i,t)+x
for i,entry in enumerate(alle):
y +=float(entry[1])*bernstein(n,i,t)+y
return x,y
bezier(np.arange(0,1,0.01))
my problem right now is that I need to do a summation of the x and y coordinates, so they become something like this
y = [y0, y0+y1, y0+y1+y2, y0+y1+y2+...+yn]
and the same for x
any pointers?
I think you can use np.cumsum http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/generated/numpy.cumsum.html:
>>>y = np.arange(0,1,0.1)
>>>[ 0. 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9]
>>>y_cum = np.cumsum(y)
>>>[ 0. 0.1 0.3 0.6 1. 1.5 2.1 2.8 3.6 4.5]
Edit:
Using your example coordinates I get the following outputs:
x,y = bezier(np.arange(0,1,0.01))
plot(x,y)
plot(np.cumsum(x),np.cumsum(y))
Assuming this is what you are looking for!
I'm not very clear on what're you trying to accomplish, but it's probably something like this:
for i, v in enumerate(y):
y2.append(sum(y[:i+1]))
Demo:
>>> y = [1, 2, 3]
>>> y2 = []
>>> for i, v in enumerate(y):
y2.append(sum(y[:i+1]))
>>> y2
[1, 3, 6]
>>>
Or, the shortcut using list comprehension:
y2 = [sum(y[:i+1]) for i,_ in enumerate(y)]
Well, hope it helps!