I'm working on a small project, and I wanted to provide multiple caching options to the end user. I figured with Django it's pretty simplistic to swap memcached for database or file based caching. My memcached implementation works like a champ without any issues. I placed time stamps on my pages, and curl consistently shows the older timestamps in locations where I want caching to work properly. However, when I switch over to the database caching, I don't get any entries in the database, and caching blatantly doesn't work.
From what I see in the documentation all that should be necessary is to change the backend from:
CACHE_BACKEND = 'memcached://localhost:11211'
To:
CACHE_BACKEND = 'db://cache_table'
The table exists after running the required manage.py (createcachetable) line, and I can view it just fine. I'm currently in testing, so I am using sqlite3, but that shouldn't matter as far as I can tell. I can confirm that the table is completely empty, and hasn't been written to at any point. Also, as I stated previously, my timestamps are 'wrong' as well, giving me more evidence that something isn't quite right.
Any thoughts? I'm using sqlite3, Django 1.0.2, python 2.6, serving via Apache currently on an Ubuntu Jaunty machine. I'm sure I'm just glossing over something simple. Thanks for any help provided.
According to the documentation you're supposed to create the table not by using syncdb but with the following:
python manage.py createcachetable cache_table
If you haven't done that, try and see if it doesn't work.
Related
I am using Django and I have an app inside called "stuff". I decided I didn't need it anymore so I removed all usage of it from all my files, I removed it from settings.py under installed apps, and then I just deleted its entire folder.
Is that okay to do? So far everything seems to still be running fine and it no longer shows up in my admin panel which is what I want. I was reading some other posts on how to remove a Django App and they were doing a lot of extra things like this:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3329773/django-how-to-completely-uninstall-a-django-app#:~:text=To%20remove%20the%20app%20from,your%20PYTHONPATH%20where%20it%20resides.
Should I be worried something bad will happen down the road? I can makemigrations and changes and do everything perfectly fine currently.
In case the "stuff" app had some models, It is a good idea to remove the tables associated to them from the database. Although they should no interfer in the correct execution of your site.
The easiest way in my opinion is to do python manage.py migrate stuff zero, before doing all the operations you describe.
At this point, if you pushed your code to a production environment, it is probably better not to mesh with the database directly and leave it as it is.
In case you have not put your website in production, this is you don't have any data in your production database, then you don't have to worry about it since the app no longer exists.
I've never done that on production so I cannot tell you that in my experience all the other steps are not needed. But I don't fell your approach is discorageous.
I'm working on a project that I inherited, and I want to add a table to my database that is very similar to one that already exists. Basically, we have a table to log users for our website, and I want to create a second table to specifically log users that our site fails to do a task for.
Since I didn't write the site myself, and am pretty new to both SQL and Django, I'm a little paranoid about running a migration (we have a lot of really sensitive data that I'm paranoid about wiping).
Instead of having a django migration create the table itself, can I create the second table in MySQL, and the corresponding model in Django, and then have this model "recognize" the SQL table? without explicitly using a migration?
SHORT ANSWER: Yes.
MEDIUM ANSWER: Yes. But you will have to figure out how Django would have created the table, and do it by hand. That's not terribly hard.
Django may also spit out some warnings on startup about migrations being needed...but those are warnings, and if the app works, then you're OK.
LONG ANSWER: Yes. But for the sake of your sanity and sleep quality, get a completely separate development environment and test your backups. (But you knew that already.)
I have a written a short python script which takes a text and does a few things with it. For example it has a function which counts the words in the text and returns the number.
How can I run this script within django?
I want to take that text from the view (textfield or something) and return a result back to the view.
I want to use django only to give the script a webinterface. And it is only for me, maybe for a few people, not for a big audience. No deployment.
Edit: When I first thought the solution would be "Django", I asked for it explicitly. That was of course a mistake because of my ignorance of WSGI. Unfortunately nobody advised me of this mistake.
First off, is your heart really set on it being Django? If not I'd advise that Django, whilst an awesome framework, is a bit much for your needs. You don't really need full stack.
You might want to look at Flask instead, which is a Python micro-framework (and dead easy to use)
However, since you asked about Django...
You can create a custom Django command (docs here) that calls your script,
that can be called from a view as described in this question.
This has the added benefit of allowing you to run your script via the Django management.py script too. Which means you can keep any future scripts related to this project nice and uniform.
For getting the results of your script running, you can get them from the same bit of code that calls the command (the part described in the last link), or you can write large result sets to a file and process that file. Which you choose would really depend on the size of your result set and if you want to do anything else with it afterwards.
What nobody told me here, since I asked about Django:
What I really needed was a simple solution called WSGI. In order to make your python script accessible from the webbrowser you don't need Django, nor Flask. Much easier is a solution like Werkzeug or CherryPy.
After following the django tutorial, as suggested in a comment above, you'll want to create a view that has a text field and a submit button. On submission of the form, your view can run the script that you wrote (either imported from another file or copy and pasted; importing is probably preferable if it's complicated, but yours sounds like it's just a few lines), then return the number that you calculated. If you want to get really fancy, you could do this with some javascript and an ajax request, but if you're just starting, you should do it with a simple form first.
I'm wondering if someone can recommend a good pattern for deploying database changes via python.
In my scenario, I've got one or more PostgreSQL databases and I'm trying to deploy a code base to each one. Here's an example of the directory structure for my SQL scripts:
my_db/
main.sql
some_directory/
foo.sql
bar.sql
some_other_directory/
baz.sql
Here's an example of what's in main.sql
/* main.sql has the following contents: */
BEGIN TRANSACTION
\i some_directory/bar.sql
\i some_directory/foo.sql
\i some_other_directory/baz.sql
COMMIT;
As you can see, main.sql defines a specific order of operations and a transaction for the database updates.
I've also got a python / twisted service monitoring SVN for changes in this db code, and I'd like to automatically deploy this code upon discovery of new stuff from the svn repository.
Can someone recommend a good pattern to use here?
Should I be parsing each file?
Should I be shelling out to psql?
...
What you're doing is actually a decent approach if you control all the servers and they're all postgresql servers.
A more general approach is to have a directory of "migrations" which are generally classes with an apply() and undo() that actually do the work in your database, and often come with
abstractions like .create_table() that generate the DDL instructions specific to whatever RDBMS you're using.
Generally, you have some naming convention that ensures the migrations run in the order they were created.
There's a migration library for python called South, though it appears to be geared specifically toward django development.
http://south.aeracode.org/docs/about.html
We just integrated sqlalchemy-migrate which has some pretty Rails-like conventions but with the power of SQLAlchemy. It's shaping up to be a really awesome product, but it does have some downfalls. It's pretty seamless to integrate though.
If I change a field in a Django model, how can I synchronize it with the database tables? Do I need to do it manually on the database or is there a tool that does helps with the process?
Alas, Django does not support any easy solution to this.
The only thing django will do for you, is restart your database with new tables that match your new models:
$ #DON'T DO THIS UNLESS YOU CAN AFFORD TO LOSE ALL YOUR DATA!
$ python PROJECT_DIR/manage.py syncdb
the next option is to use the various sql* options to manage.py to see what django would do to match the current models to the database, then issue your own ALTER TABLE commands to make everything work right. Of course this is error prone and difficult.
The real solution is to use a database migration tool, such as south to generate migration code.
Here is a similar question with discussion about various database migration options for django.
Can't seem to be able to add a comment to the marked answer, probably because I haven't got enough rep (be nice if SO told me so though).
Anyway, just wanted to add that in the answered post, I believe it is wrong about syncdb - syncdb does not touch tables once they have been created and have data in them. You should not lose data by calling it (otherwise, how could you add new tables for new apps?)
I believe the poster was referring to the reset command instead, which does result in data loss - it will drop the table and recreate it and hence it'll have all the latest model changes.
Django Evolution can help, but the best option really is to plan out your schema in advance, or to make simple modifications manually. Or, to be willing to toast your test data by dropping tables and re-syncing.
Django does not provide for this out of the box.
Here's some information from the Django Book on doing it by hand (see Making Changes to a Database Schema). This works for straightforward, simple changes.
Longer-term, you'll probably want to use a migration tool. There are three major options:
django-evolution
Dmigrations (written by Simon Willison, one of the creators of Django) (works only with MySQL)
South
EDIT: Looking through the question linked by TokenMacGuy, I'll add two more to the list for the sake of completeness:
Migratory
simplemigrations
Just to throw in an extra opinion - dmigrations is pretty nice and clear to use, but I'd say South is your best bet. Again, it's easy to get into, but it's more powerful and also has support for more database backends than just MySQL. It even handles MSSQL, if that's your thing