Related
I am attempting to copy the functionality of the built-in property class / decorator; a very basic example of what I want to is this:
# If a condition is met, run the first function, else, the second.
#godspeed()
def test():
print(1, 2, 3, 4)
#test.else_()
def test():
print(5, 6, 7, 8)
Here's what I have so far:
import inspect
class godspeed_class():
def __init__(
self,
func,
args,
kwargs,
value,
):
self.func = func
self.args = args
self.kwargs = kwargs
self.value = value
def __call__(self):
if self.value:
self.func(*self.args, **self.kwargs)
else:
self.else_func(*self.else_args, **self.else_kwargs)
def else_(self, *args, **kwargs):
def wrapper(func):
self.else_func = func
self.else_args = args
self.else_kwargs = kwargs
return wrapper
def godspeed(*args, value = 0, **kwargs):
def wrapper(func):
_ = godspeed_class(func, args, kwargs, value)
inspect.stack(1)[1][0].f_globals[func.__name__] = _
return wrapper
I already know how to implement the condition parsing, but I am having trouble with storing the function under the else_ decorator in the class, so that I can call it if the condition isn't met.
In addition, despite injecting the new class directly into the global namespace, when I run print(test), it tells me it's a NoneType object.
Note: Code has been updated; however, it still gives me the "NoneType object" error.
You need to change both of your wrapper functions to return a callable object, probably the instance of your class. Otherwise you're going to have None as the value for the method, since the decorator syntax will assign the return value to the name of the decorated function, which means that even if your inspect hack works, it will get overwritten.
I'd suggest:
class godspeed_class():
... # __init__ and __call__ can remain the same
def else_(self, *args, **kwargs):
def wrapper(func):
self.else_func = func
self.else_args = args
self.else_kwargs = kwargs
return self # add return here
return wrapper
def godspeed(*args, value = 0, **kwargs):
def wrapper(func):
return godspeed_class(func, args, kwargs, value) # and here (rather than inspect stuff)
return wrapper
This will do the job for your example with a top-level test function. If you want to be able to decorate methods, you'll also need to add a __get__ method to the class to add binding behavior (otherwise you'll not get the self argument passed in to the wrapped method).
It's a bit misleading to use wrapper as the name there, as the inner functions are the actual decorators being used here (the top level godspeed function and the else_ method are decorator factories). Normally you use wrapper as a name of a function returned by a decorator (but you're using your class for that instead).
I'd also note that it's a bit strange that you're passing the arguments for the functions to the decorator factories, rather than having __call__ accept arguments that it passes along to the relevant function. It's a bit unusual for a decorator that leaves behind a callable (rather than something like property that works differently) to dramatically change a function's calling convention, as it may end up hard for a caller to know what arguments they're expected to pass in, if the function signature isn't representative any more.
A decorator is nothing magical. Basically, the #decorator syntax is just syntactic sugar, so this:
#mydecorator
def func():
pass
is just a convenient shortcut for
def func():
pass
func = mydecorator(func)
IOW, a "decorator" is a callable object that takes a callable as input and returns a callable (well, it's supposed to return a callable at least - you can actually return whatever, but then you'll break everyone's expectations).
Most often, the decorator is written as a simple function returning a closure over the decorated function:
def trace(func):
def wrapper(*args, **kw):
result = func(*args, **kw)
print("{}({}, {}) => {}". format(func, args, kw, result))
return result
return wrapper
#trace
def foo(x):
return 42 * x
But (since closures are the poor man's classes and classes the poor man's closures) you can also implement it as a callable class, in which case the initializer will receive the decorated func, which in turn will be replaced by the instance:
class trace(object):
def __init__(self, func):
self.func = func
def __call__(self, *args, **kw):
result = self.func(*args, **kw)
print("{}({}, {}) => {}". format(self.func, args, kw, result))
return result
#trace
def foo(x):
return 42 * x
Then you have "parameterized" decorators - the one that can take arguments. In this case you need two level of indirection, the top-level one (the one used as decorator) returning the actual decorator (the one that receives the function), ie:
def trace(out):
def really_trace(func):
def wrapper(*args, **kw):
result = func(*args, **kw)
out.write("{}({}, {}) => {}\n". format(func, args, kw, result))
return result
return wrapper
return really_trace
#trace(sys.stderr)
def foo(x):
return 42 * x
I leave the class-based implementation as an exercise to the reader ;-)
Now in your case, the fact that test ends up being None is quite simply due to the fact that your wrapper func forgets to return the godspeed_class instance as it should (instead messing with the function's f_globals, which, as you noticed, doesn't work as expected).
Since you didn't clearly explained what you're trying to achieve here ("something similar to property" isn't a proper spec), it's hard to provide a working solution, but as a starting point you may want to fix your godspeed func to behave as expected:
def godspeed(*args, value = 0, **kwargs):
def wrapper(func):
return godspeed_class(func, args, kwargs, value)
return wrapper
I'm looking to create a dynamic wrapper class that exposes the API calls from a provided object using data in the object.
Statically it looks like this:
class Concrete:
def __init__(self, data):
self.data = data
def print_data(self):
print(self.data)
class Wrapper:
'''
One day this will wrap a variety of objects. But today
it can only handle Concrete objects.
'''
def wrap_it(self, concrete):
self.cco = concrete # concreteobject=cco
def print_data(self):
self.cco.print_data()
cco = Concrete(5)
wcco = Wrapper()
wcco.wrap_it(cco)
wcco.print_data()
Produces
5
I'd like to figure out how to do the same thing but make
wrap_it dynamic. It should search the concrete object
find the functions, and create functions of the same name
that call the same function in the concrete object.
I imagine that the solution involves inspect.signature or
at least some use of *args and **kwargs, but I've not seen
an example on how to put all this together.
You can use the __getattr__ magic method to hook getting undefined attributes, and forward them to the concrete object:
class DynamicWrapper():
def wrap_it(self, concrete):
self.cco = concrete
def __getattr__(self, k):
def wrapper(*args, **kwargs):
print(f'DynamicWrapper calling {k} with args {args} {kwargs}')
return getattr(self.cco, k)(*args, **kwargs)
if hasattr(self.cco, k):
return wrapper
else:
raise AttributeError(f'No such field/method: {k}')
cco = Concrete(5)
dwcco = DynamicWrapper()
dwcco.wrap_it(cco)
dwcco.print_data()
Use the dir() function to get the attributes of the given object, check if they are callable and assign them to your wrapper, like this:
class Wrapper:
def wrap_it(self, objToWrap):
for attr in dir(objToWrap):
if not attr.startswith('__') and callable(getattr(objToWrap, attr)):
exec('self.%s = objToWrap.%s' % (attr, attr))
And now, for testing.
>>> cco = Concrete(5)
>>> wcco = Wrapper()
>>> wcco.wrap_it(cco)
>>> wcco.print_data()
5
I have a test framework that requires test cases to be defined using the following class patterns:
class TestBase:
def __init__(self, params):
self.name = str(self.__class__)
print('initializing test: {} with params: {}'.format(self.name, params))
class TestCase1(TestBase):
def run(self):
print('running test: ' + self.name)
When I create and run a test, I get the following:
>>> test1 = TestCase1('test 1 params')
initializing test: <class '__main__.TestCase1'> with params: test 1 params
>>> test1.run()
running test: <class '__main__.TestCase1'>
The test framework searches for and loads all TestCase classes it can find, instantiates each one, then calls the run method for each test.
load_test(TestCase1(test_params1))
load_test(TestCase2(test_params2))
...
load_test(TestCaseN(test_params3))
...
for test in loaded_tests:
test.run()
However, I now have some test cases for which I don't want the __init__ method called until the time that the run method is called, but I have little control over the framework structure or methods. How can I delay the call to __init__ without redefining the __init__ or run methods?
Update
The speculations that this originated as an XY problem are correct. A coworker asked me this question a while back when I was maintaining said test framework. I inquired further about what he was really trying to achieve and we figured out a simpler workaround that didn't involve changing the framework or introducing metaclasses, etc.
However, I still think this is a question worth investigating: if I wanted to create new objects with "lazy" initialization ("lazy" as in lazy evaluation generators such as range, etc.) what would be the best way of accomplishing it? My best attempt so far is listed below, I'm interested in knowing if there's anything simpler or less verbose.
First Solution：use property.the elegant way of setter/getter in python.
class Bars(object):
def __init__(self):
self._foo = None
#property
def foo(self):
if not self._foo:
print("lazy initialization")
self._foo = [1,2,3]
return self._foo
if __name__ == "__main__":
f = Bars()
print(f.foo)
print(f.foo)
Second Solution:the proxy solution,and always implement by decorator.
In short, Proxy is a wrapper that wraps the object you need. Proxy could provide additional functionality to the object that it wraps and doesn't change the object's code. It's a surrogate which provide the abitity of control access to a object.there is the code come form user Cyclone.
class LazyProperty:
def __init__(self, method):
self.method = method
self.method_name = method.__name__
def __get__(self, obj, cls):
if not obj:
return None
value = self.method(obj)
print('value {}'.format(value))
setattr(obj, self.method_name, value)
return value
class test:
def __init__(self):
self._resource = None
#LazyProperty
def resource(self):
print("lazy")
self._resource = tuple(range(5))
return self._resource
if __name__ == '__main__':
t = test()
print(t.resource)
print(t.resource)
print(t.resource)
To be used for true one-time calculated lazy properties. I like it because it avoids sticking extra attributes on objects, and once activated does not waste time checking for attribute presence
Metaclass option
You can intercept the call to __init__ using a metaclass. Create the object with __new__ and overwrite the __getattribute__ method to check if __init__ has been called or not and call it if it hasn't.
class DelayInit(type):
def __call__(cls, *args, **kwargs):
def init_before_get(obj, attr):
if not object.__getattribute__(obj, '_initialized'):
obj.__init__(*args, **kwargs)
obj._initialized = True
return object.__getattribute__(obj, attr)
cls.__getattribute__ = init_before_get
new_obj = cls.__new__(cls, *args, **kwargs)
new_obj._initialized = False
return new_obj
class TestDelayed(TestCase1, metaclass=DelayInit):
pass
In the example below, you'll see that the init print won't occur until the run method is executed.
>>> new_test = TestDelayed('delayed test params')
>>> new_test.run()
initializing test: <class '__main__.TestDelayed'> with params: delayed test params
running test: <class '__main__.TestDelayed'>
Decorator option
You could also use a decorator that has a similar pattern to the metaclass above:
def delayinit(cls):
def init_before_get(obj, attr):
if not object.__getattribute__(obj, '_initialized'):
obj.__init__(*obj._init_args, **obj._init_kwargs)
obj._initialized = True
return object.__getattribute__(obj, attr)
cls.__getattribute__ = init_before_get
def construct(*args, **kwargs):
obj = cls.__new__(cls, *args, **kwargs)
obj._init_args = args
obj._init_kwargs = kwargs
obj._initialized = False
return obj
return construct
#delayinit
class TestDelayed(TestCase1):
pass
This will behave identically to the example above.
In Python, there is no way that you can avoid calling __init__ when you instantiate a class cls. If calling cls(args) returns an instance of cls, then the language guarantees that cls.__init__ will have been called.
So the only way to achieve something similar to what you are asking is to introduce another class that will postpone the calling of __init__ in the original class until an attribute of the instantiated class is being accessed.
Here is one way:
def delay_init(cls):
class Delay(cls):
def __init__(self, *arg, **kwarg):
self._arg = arg
self._kwarg = kwarg
def __getattribute__(self, name):
self.__class__ = cls
arg = self._arg
kwarg = self._kwarg
del self._arg
del self._kwarg
self.__init__(*arg, **kwarg)
return getattr(self, name)
return Delay
This wrapper function works by catching any attempt to access an attribute of the instantiated class. When such an attempt is made, it changes the instance's __class__ to the original class, calls the original __init__ method with the arguments that were used when the instance was created, and then returns the proper attribute. This function can be used as decorator for your TestCase1 class:
class TestBase:
def __init__(self, params):
self.name = str(self.__class__)
print('initializing test: {} with params: {}'.format(self.name, params))
class TestCase1(TestBase):
def run(self):
print('running test: ' + self.name)
>>> t1 = TestCase1("No delay")
initializing test: <class '__main__.TestCase1'> with params: No delay
>>> t2 = delay_init(TestCase1)("Delayed init")
>>> t1.run()
running test: <class '__main__.TestCase1'>
>>> t2.run()
initializing test: <class '__main__.TestCase1'> with params: Delayed init
running test: <class '__main__.TestCase1'>
>>>
Be careful where you apply this function though. If you decorate TestBase with delay_init, it will not work, because it will turn the TestCase1 instances into TestBase instances.
In my answer I'd like to focus on cases when one wants to instantiate a class whose initialiser (dunder init) has side effects. For instance, pysftp.Connection, creates an SSH connection, which may be undesired until it's actually used.
In a great blog series about conceiving of wrapt package (nit-picky decorator implementaion), the author describes Transparent object proxy. This code can be customised for the subject in question.
class LazyObject:
_factory = None
'''Callable responsible for creation of target object'''
_object = None
'''Target object created lazily'''
def __init__(self, factory):
self._factory = factory
def __getattr__(self, name):
if not self._object:
self._object = self._factory()
return getattr(self._object, name)
Then it can be used as:
obj = LazyObject(lambda: dict(foo = 'bar'))
obj.keys() # dict_keys(['foo'])
But len(obj), obj['foo'] and other language constructs which invoke Python object protocols (dunder methods, like __len__ and __getitem__) will not work. However, for many cases, which are limited to regular methods, this is a solution.
To proxy object protocol implementations, it's possible to use neither __getattr__, nor __getattribute__ (to do it in a generic way). The latter's documentation notes:
This method may still be bypassed when looking up special methods as the result of implicit invocation via language syntax or built-in functions. See Special method lookup.
As a complete solution is demanded, there are examples of manual implementations like werkzeug's LocalProxy and django's SimpleLazyObject. However a clever workaround is possible.
Luckily there's a dedicated package (based on wrapt) for the exact use case, lazy-object-proxy which is described in this blog post.
from lazy_object_proxy import Proxy
obj = Proxy(labmda: dict(foo = 'bar'))
obj.keys() # dict_keys(['foo'])
len(len(obj)) # 1
obj['foo'] # 'bar'
One alternative would be to write a wrapper that takes a class as input and returns a class with delayed initialization until any member is accessed. This could for example be done as this:
def lazy_init(cls):
class LazyInit(cls):
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
self.args = args
self.kwargs = kwargs
self._initialized = False
def __getattr__(self, attr):
if not self.__dict__['_initialized']:
cls.__init__(self,
*self.__dict__['args'], **self.__dict__['kwargs'])
self._initialized = True
return self.__dict__[attr]
return LazyInit
This could then be used as such
load_test(lazy_init(TestCase1)(test_params1))
load_test(lazy_init(TestCase2)(test_params2))
...
load_test(lazy_init(TestCaseN)(test_params3))
...
for test in loaded_tests:
test.run()
Answering your original question (and the problem I think you are actually trying to solve), "How can I delay the init call until an attribute is accessed?": don't call init until you access the attribute.
Said another way: you can make the class initialization simultaneous with the attribute call. What you seem to actually want is 1) create a collection of TestCase# classes along with their associated parameters; 2) run each test case.
Probably your original problem came from thinking you had to initialize all your TestCase classes in order to create a list of them that you could iterate over. But in fact you can store class objects in lists, dicts etc. That means you can do whatever method you have for finding all TestCase classes and store those class objects in a dict with their relevant parameters. Then just iterate that dict and call each class with its run() method.
It might look like:
tests = {TestCase1: 'test 1 params', TestCase2: 'test 2 params', TestCase3: 'test 3 params'}
for test_case, param in tests.items():
test_case(param).run()
Overridding __new__
You could do this by overriding __new__ method and replacing __init__ method with a custom function.
def init(cls, real_init):
def wrapped(self, *args, **kwargs):
# This will run during the first call to `__init__`
# made after `__new__`. Here we re-assign the original
# __init__ back to class and assign a custom function
# to `instances.__init__`.
cls.__init__ = real_init
def new_init():
if new_init.called is False:
real_init(self, *args, **kwargs)
new_init.called = True
new_init.called = False
self.__init__ = new_init
return wrapped
class DelayInitMixin(object):
def __new__(cls, *args, **kwargs):
cls.__init__ = init(cls, cls.__init__)
return object.__new__(cls)
class A(DelayInitMixin):
def __init__(self, a, b):
print('inside __init__')
self.a = sum(a)
self.b = sum(b)
def __getattribute__(self, attr):
init = object.__getattribute__(self, '__init__')
if not init.called:
init()
return object.__getattribute__(self, attr)
def run(self):
pass
def fun(self):
pass
Demo:
>>> a = A(range(1000), range(10000))
>>> a.run()
inside __init__
>>> a.a, a.b
(499500, 49995000)
>>> a.run(), a.__init__()
(None, None)
>>> b = A(range(100), range(10000))
>>> b.a, b.b
inside __init__
(4950, 49995000)
>>> b.run(), b.__init__()
(None, None)
Using cached properties
The idea is to do the heavy calculation only once by caching results. This approach will lead to much more readable code if the whole point of delaying initialization is improving performance.
Django comes with a nice decorator called #cached_property. I tend to use it a lot in both code and unit-tests for caching results of heavy properties.
A cached_property is a non-data descriptor. Hence once the key is set in instance's dictionary, the access to property would always get the value from there.
class cached_property(object):
"""
Decorator that converts a method with a single self argument into a
property cached on the instance.
Optional ``name`` argument allows you to make cached properties of other
methods. (e.g. url = cached_property(get_absolute_url, name='url') )
"""
def __init__(self, func, name=None):
self.func = func
self.__doc__ = getattr(func, '__doc__')
self.name = name or func.__name__
def __get__(self, instance, cls=None):
if instance is None:
return self
res = instance.__dict__[self.name] = self.func(instance)
return res
Usage:
class A:
#cached_property
def a(self):
print('calculating a')
return sum(range(1000))
#cached_property
def b(self):
print('calculating b')
return sum(range(10000))
Demo:
>>> a = A()
>>> a.a
calculating a
499500
>>> a.b
calculating b
49995000
>>> a.a, a.b
(499500, 49995000)
I think you can use a wrapper class to hold the real class you want to instance, and use call __init__ yourself in your code, like(Python 3 code):
class Wrapper:
def __init__(self, cls):
self.cls = cls
self.instance = None
def your_method(self, *args, **kwargs):
if not self.instance:
self.instnace = cls()
return self.instance(*args, **kwargs)
class YourClass:
def __init__(self):
print("calling __init__")
but it's a dump way, but without any trick.
This question already has answers here:
How can I decorate an instance method with a decorator class?
(2 answers)
Closed 4 years ago.
While there are plenty of resources about using classes as decorators, I haven't been able to find any that deal with the problem of decorating methods. The goal of this question is to fix that. I will post my own solution, but of course everyone else is invited to post theirs as well.
Why the "standard" implementation doesn't work
The problem with the standard decorator class implementation is that python will not create a bound method of the decorated function:
class Deco:
def __init__(self, func):
self.func= func
def __call__(self, *args):
self.func(*args)
class Class:
#Deco
def hello(self):
print('hello world')
Class().hello() # throws TypeError: hello() missing 1 required positional argument: 'self'
A method decorator needs to overcome this hurdle.
Requirements
Taking the classes from the previous example, the following things are expected to work:
>>> i= Class()
>>> i.hello()
hello world
>>> i.hello
<__main__.Deco object at 0x7f4ae8b518d0>
>>> Class.hello is Class().hello
False
>>> Class().hello is Class().hello
False
>>> i.hello is i.hello
True
Ideally, the function's __doc__ and signature and similar attributes are preserved as well.
Usually when a method is accessed as some_instance.some_method(), python's descriptor protocol kicks in and calls some_method.__get__(), which returns a bound method. However, because the method has been replaced with an instance of the Deco class, that does not happen - because Deco is not a descriptor. In order to make Deco work as expected, it must implement a __get__ method that returns a bound copy of itself.
Implementation
Here's basic "do nothing" decorator class:
import inspect
import functools
from copy import copy
class Deco(object):
def __init__(self, func):
self.__self__ = None # "__self__" is also used by bound methods
self.__wrapped__ = func
functools.update_wrapper(self, func)
def __call__(self, *args, **kwargs):
# if bound to an object, pass it as the first argument
if self.__self__ is not None:
args = (self.__self__,) + args
#== change the following line to make the decorator do something ==
return self.__wrapped__(*args, **kwargs)
def __get__(self, instance, owner):
if instance is None:
return self
# create a bound copy
bound = copy(self)
bound.__self__ = instance
# update __doc__ and similar attributes
functools.update_wrapper(bound, self.__wrapped__)
# add the bound instance to the object's dict so that
# __get__ won't be called a 2nd time
setattr(instance, self.__wrapped__.__name__, bound)
return bound
To make the decorator do something, add your code in the __call__ method.
Here's one that takes parameters:
class DecoWithArgs(object):
#== change the constructor's parameters to fit your needs ==
def __init__(self, *args):
self.args = args
self.__wrapped__ = None
self.__self__ = None
def __call__(self, *args, **kwargs):
if self.__wrapped__ is None:
return self.__wrap(*args, **kwargs)
else:
return self.__call_wrapped_function(*args, **kwargs)
def __wrap(self, func):
# update __doc__ and similar attributes
functools.update_wrapper(self, func)
return self
def __call_wrapped_function(self, *args, **kwargs):
# if bound to an object, pass it as the first argument
if self.__self__ is not None:
args = (self.__self__,) + args
#== change the following line to make the decorator do something ==
return self.__wrapped__(*args, **kwargs)
def __get__(self, instance, owner):
if instance is None:
return self
# create a bound copy of this object
bound = copy(self)
bound.__self__ = instance
bound.__wrap(self.__wrapped__)
# add the bound decorator to the object's dict so that
# __get__ won't be called a 2nd time
setattr(instance, self.__wrapped__.__name__, bound)
return bound
An implementation like this lets us use the decorator on methods as well as functions, so I think it should be considered good practice.
I have a decorator class validatekeys() and a Node3D() class.
The intention is for Node3D to hold coordinate values of x, y, and z which are retrieved using a #property decorator, and can be set using either a #coords.setter decorator (which calls set_coords()) or directly using set_coords() which is itself decorated with validatekeys(). I am using decorators to accomplish this so that I can add other classes later, like Node2D(), for example.
Code:
class validatekeys(object):
def __init__(self,*keysIterable):
self.validkeys = []
for k in keysIterable:
self.validkeys.append(k)
def __call__(self,f):
def wrapped_f(*args,**kwargs):
for a in kwargs:
if not a in self.validkeys:
raise Exception()
self.__dict__.update(kwargs)
return f(self,**kwargs)
return wrapped_f
class Node3D(object):
#property
def coords(self):
return self.__dict__
#coords.setter
def coords(self,Coords):
self.set_coords(**Coords)
#validatekeys('x','y','z')
def set_coords(self,**Coords):
pass
However, part of the output is not as expected:
n = Node2D()
n.coords #{} <--expected
n.set_coords(x=1,y=2)
n.coords #{} <--not expected
n.set_coords(a=1,b=2) #Exception <--expected
It looks like the self.__dict__ is not being updated correctly. However, I've been unable to figure out how to fix this. Any suggestions?
Note that although I am certainly interested in alternative formulations/approaches on solving this problem (validating keys input to a setter), this is mostly a learning exercise to understand how decorators, classes, etc etc work.
Your decorator is updating the wrong __dict__; self in your decorator __call__ is the decorator object itself.
You need to extract the bound self argument from the called wrapper:
def wrapped_f(*args, **kwargs):
for a in kwargs:
if not a in self.validkeys:
raise Exception()
instance = args[0]
instance.__dict__.update(kwargs)
return f(*args, **kwargs)
You can give your wrapped_f() an explicit first argument too:
def wrapped_f(instance, *args, **kwargs):
for a in kwargs:
if not a in self.validkeys:
raise Exception()
instance.__dict__.update(kwargs)
return f(instance, *args, **kwargs)
Here instance is bound to the Node3D instance. Note that there is no hard requirement to name this variable self; that is just a convention.
The self in your __call__ refers to the validator, not the Node3D object, so the validator is updating its own __dict__. Try this instead:
class validatekeys(object):
def __init__(self,*keysIterable):
self.validkeys = []
for k in keysIterable:
self.validkeys.append(k)
def __call__(validator_self,f):
def wrapped_f(self, *args,**kwargs):
for a in kwargs:
if not a in validator_self.validkeys:
raise Exception()
self.__dict__.update(kwargs)
return f(self, *args, **kwargs)
return wrapped_f
Here I've renamed the self in the __call__ to validator_self to make it clear that that self refers to the validator. I added a self to the wrapper function; this self will refer to the "real" self of the Node3D object where the validated method is.