I've been working through an ordered ManyToManyField widget, and have the front-end aspect of it working nicely:
Unfortunately, I'm having a great deal of trouble getting the backend working. The obvious way to hook up the backend is to use a through table keyed off a model with ForeignKeys to both sides of the relationship and overwrite the save method. This would work great, except that due to idiosyncrasies of the content, it is an absolute requirement that this widget be placed in a fieldset (using the ModelAdmin fieldsets property), which is apparently not possible.
I'm out of ideas. Any suggestions?
Thanks!
In regard to how to set up the models, you're right in that a through table with an "order" column is the ideal way to represent it. You're also right in that Django will not let you refer to that relationship in a fieldset. The trick to cracking this problem is to remember that the field names you specify in the "fieldsets" or "fields" of a ModelAdmin do not actually refer to the fields of the Model, but to the fields of the ModelForm, which we are free to override to our heart's delight. With many2many fields, this gets tricky, but bear with me:
Let's say you're trying to represent contests and competitors that compete in them, with an ordered many2many between contests and competitors where the order represents the competitors' ranking in that contest. Your models.py would then look like this:
from django.db import models
class Contest(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=50)
# More fields here, if you like.
contestants = models.ManyToManyField('Contestant', through='ContestResults')
class Contestant(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=50)
class ContestResults(models.Model):
contest = models.ForeignKey(Contest)
contestant = models.ForeignKey(Contestant)
rank = models.IntegerField()
Hopefully, this is similar to what you're dealing with. Now, for the admin. I've written an example admin.py with plenty of comments to explain what's happening, but here's a summary to help you along:
Since I don't have the code to the ordered m2m widget you've written, I've used a placeholder dummy widget that simply inherits from TextInput. The input holds a comma-separated list (without spaces) of contestant IDs, and the order of their appearance in the string determines the value of their "rank" column in the ContestResults model.
What happens is that we override the default ModelForm for Contest with our own, and then define a "results" field inside it (we can't call the field "contestants", since there would be a name conflict with the m2m field in the model). We then override __init__(), which is called when the form is displayed in the admin, so we can fetch any ContestResults that may have already been defined for the Contest, and use them to populate the widget. We also override save(), so that we can in turn get the data from the widget and create the needed ContestResults.
Note that for the sake of simplicity this example omits things like validation of the data from the widget, so things will break if you try to type in anything unexpected in the text input. Also, the code for creating the ContestResults is quite simplistic, and could be greatly improved upon.
I should also add that I've actually ran this code and verified that it works.
from django import forms
from django.contrib import admin
from models import Contest, Contestant, ContestResults
# Generates a function that sequentially calls the two functions that were
# passed to it
def func_concat(old_func, new_func):
def function():
old_func()
new_func()
return function
# A dummy widget to be replaced with your own.
class OrderedManyToManyWidget(forms.widgets.TextInput):
pass
# A simple CharField that shows a comma-separated list of contestant IDs.
class ResultsField(forms.CharField):
widget = OrderedManyToManyWidget()
class ContestAdminForm(forms.models.ModelForm):
# Any fields declared here can be referred to in the "fieldsets" or
# "fields" of the ModelAdmin. It is crucial that our custom field does not
# use the same name as the m2m field field in the model ("contestants" in
# our example).
results = ResultsField()
# Be sure to specify your model here.
class Meta:
model = Contest
# Override init so we can populate the form field with the existing data.
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
instance = kwargs.get('instance', None)
# See if we are editing an existing Contest. If not, there is nothing
# to be done.
if instance and instance.pk:
# Get a list of all the IDs of the contestants already specified
# for this contest.
contestants = ContestResults.objects.filter(contest=instance).order_by('rank').values_list('contestant_id', flat=True)
# Make them into a comma-separated string, and put them in our
# custom field.
self.base_fields['results'].initial = ','.join(map(str, contestants))
# Depending on how you've written your widget, you can pass things
# like a list of available contestants to it here, if necessary.
super(ContestAdminForm, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
def save(self, *args, **kwargs):
# This "commit" business complicates things somewhat. When true, it
# means that the model instance will actually be saved and all is
# good. When false, save() returns an unsaved instance of the model.
# When save() calls are made by the Django admin, commit is pretty
# much invariably false, though I'm not sure why. This is a problem
# because when creating a new Contest instance, it needs to have been
# saved in the DB and have a PK, before we can create ContestResults.
# Fortunately, all models have a built-in method called save_m2m()
# which will always be executed after save(), and we can append our
# ContestResults-creating code to the existing same_m2m() method.
commit = kwargs.get('commit', True)
# Save the Contest and get an instance of the saved model
instance = super(ContestAdminForm, self).save(*args, **kwargs)
# This is known as a lexical closure, which means that if we store
# this function and execute it later on, it will execute in the same
# context (i.e. it will have access to the current instance and self).
def save_m2m():
# This is really naive code and should be improved upon,
# especially in terms of validation, but the basic gist is to make
# the needed ContestResults. For now, we'll just delete any
# existing ContestResults for this Contest and create them anew.
ContestResults.objects.filter(contest=instance).delete()
# Make a list of (rank, contestant ID) tuples from the comma-
# -separated list of contestant IDs we get from the results field.
formdata = enumerate(map(int, self.cleaned_data['results'].split(',')), 1)
for rank, contestant in formdata:
ContestResults.objects.create(contest=instance, contestant_id=contestant, rank=rank)
if commit:
# If we're committing (fat chance), simply run the closure.
save_m2m()
else:
# Using a function concatenator, ensure our save_m2m closure is
# called after the existing save_m2m function (which will be
# called later on if commit is False).
self.save_m2m = func_concat(self.save_m2m, save_m2m)
# Return the instance like a good save() method.
return instance
class ContestAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
# The precious fieldsets.
fieldsets = (
('Basic Info', {
'fields': ('name', 'results',)
}),)
# Here's where we override our form
form = ContestAdminForm
admin.site.register(Contest, ContestAdmin)
In case you're wondering, I had ran into this problem myself on a project I've been working on, so most of this code comes from that project. I hope you find it useful.
Related
I have a foreign key relationship in my Django (v3) models:
class Example(models.Model):
title = models.CharField(max_length=200) # this is irrelevant for the question here
not_before = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)
...
class ExampleItem(models.Model):
myParent = models.ForeignKey(Example, on_delete=models.CASCADE)
execution_date = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)
....
Can I have code running/triggered whenever an ExampleItem is "added to the list of items in an Example instance"? What I would like to do is run some checks and, depending on the concrete Example instance possibly alter the ExampleItem before saving it.
To illustrate
Let's say the Example's class not_before date dictates that the ExampleItem's execution_date must not be before not_before I would like to check if the "to be saved" ExampleItem's execution_date violates this condition. If so, I would want to either change the execution_date to make it "valid" or throw an exception (whichever is easier). The same is true for a duplicate execution_date (i.e. if the respective Example already has an ExampleItem with the same execution_date).
So, in a view, I have code like the following:
def doit(request, example_id):
# get the relevant `Example` object
example = get_object_or_404(Example, pk=example_id)
# create a new `ExampleItem`
itm = ExampleItem()
# set the item's parent
itm.myParent = example # <- this should trigger my validation code!
itm.save() # <- (or this???)
The thing is, this view is not the only way to create new ExampleItems; I also have an API for example that can do the same (let alone that a user could potentially "add ExampleItems manually via REPL). Preferably the validation code must not be duplicated in all the places where new ExampleItems can be created.
I was looking into Signals (Django docu), specifically pre_save and post_save (of ExampleItem) but I think pre_save is too early while post_save is too late... Also m2m_changed looks interesting, but I do not have a many-to-many relationship.
What would be the best/correct way to handle these requirements? They seem to be rather common, I imagine. Do I have to restructure my model?
The obvious solution here is to put this code in the ExampleItem.save() method - just beware that Model.save() is not invoked by some queryset bulk operations.
Using signals handlers on your own app's models is actually an antipattern - the goal of signal is to allow for your app to hook into other app's lifecycle without having to change those other apps code.
Also (unrelated but), you can populate your newly created models instances directly via their initializers ie:
itm = ExampleItem(myParent=example)
itm.save()
and you can even save them directly:
# creates a new instance, populate it AND save it
itm = ExampleItem.objects.create(myParent=example)
This will still invoke your model's save method so it's safe for your use case.
I am trying to make a serializer with a nested "many to many" relationship. The goal is to get a serialized JSON object contain an array of serialized related objects. The models look like this (names changed, structure preserved)
from django.contrib.auth.models import User
PizzaTopping(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=255)
inventor = models.ForeignKey(User)
Pizza(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=255)
toppings = models.ManyToManyField(PizzaTopping)
The incoming JSON looks like this
{
"name": "My Pizza",
"toppings": [
{"name": "cheese", "inventor": "bob"},
{"name": "tomatoes", "inventor": "alice"}
]
}
My current serializer code looks like this
class ToppingRelatedField(RelatedField):
def get_queryset(self):
return Topping.objects.all()
def to_representation(self, instance):
return {'name': instance.name, 'inventor': instance.inventor.username}
def to_internal_value(self, data):
name = data.get('name', None)
inventor = data.get('inventor', None)
try:
user = User.objects.get(username=inventor)
except Setting.DoesNotExist:
raise serializers.ValidationError('bad inventor')
return Topping(name=name, inventor=user)
class PizzaSerializer(ModelSerializer):
toppings = ToppingRelatedField(many=True)
class Meta:
model = Pizza
fields = ('name', 'toppings')
It seems that since I defined the to_internal_value() for the custom field, it should create/update the many-to-many field automatically. But when I try to create pizzas, I get "Cannot add "": the value for field "pizzatopping" is None" ValueError. It looks like somewhere deep inside, Django decided that the many to many field should be called by the model name. How do I convince it otherwise?
Edit #1: It seems that this might be a genuine bug somewhere in Django or DRF. DRF seems to be doing the right thing, it detects that it is dealing with a ManyToMany field and tries to create toppings from the data using the custom field and add them to the pizza. Since it only has a pizza instance and a field name, it uses setattr(pizza, 'toppings', toppings) to do it. Django seems to be doing the right thing. The __set__ is defined and seems to figure out that it needs to use add() method in the manager. But somewhere along the way, the field name 'toppings' gets lost and replaced by the default. Which is "related model name in lower case".
Edit #2: I have found a solution. I will document it in an answer once I am allowed. It seems that the to_internal_value() method in the RelatedField subclass needs to return a saved instance of a Topping for the ManyToMany thing to work properly. The existing docs show the opposite, a this link (http://www.django-rest-framework.org/api-guide/fields/#custom-fields) the example clearly returns an unsaved instance.
Seems like there is an undocumented requirement. For write operations to work with a custom ManyToMany field, the custom field class to_internal_value() method needs to save the instance before returning it. The DRF docs omit this and the example of making a custom field (at http://www.django-rest-framework.org/api-guide/fields/#custom-fields) shows the method returning an unsaved instance. I am going to update the issue I opened with the DRF team.
I was also trying to return multiple fields as json but getting error unhashable type: 'dict. Finally, I found what's wrong with my approach here - https://github.com/encode/django-rest-framework/issues/5104
RelatedFields generally represent a related object as a single value
(eg, a slug, primary key, url, etc...). If you want to provide a
nested object representation, then you should use a nested serializer.
I have the following models:
class Recipe(models.Model):
fields...
class Ingredient(models.Model):
fields...
class UsesIngredient(models.Model):
recipe = models.ForeignKey(Recipe)
ingredient = models.ForeignKey(Ingredient)
amount = models.FloatField()
group = models.CharField()
I have a view which lets the user add any number of 'UsesIngredient' models for a certain recipe through a dynamic formset. The group attribute is automatically filled in an hidden from the user.
The problem is that when the users adds a new form in the formset, but doesn't fill in any of the fields, I don't want that form saved. However, django still tries to save the form because the 'group' attribute has 'changed' (because it has been automatically filled in when the extra form was created).
Is there any way to get around this?
Thanks!
Well, I still didn't feel completely comfortable with Tim Edgar's solution, so I kept looking. I guess I found what I was looking for.
The 'Form' class, has two undocumented methods that are of use in this case: 'has_changed()' and '_get_changed_data'.
During ModelFormSet validation, every form checks 'has_changed()'. If the form did not changed, validation is skipped and a correct form is assumed.
Likewise, during ModelFormSet saving, the save_new_objects checks every form to see if it has changed. If it didn't change, the form isn't saved.
So my solution was to override the has_changed() method to return False if only the 'group' attribute has changed, and all other fields are empty. This is my implementation:
class UsesIngredientForm(forms.ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = UsesIngredient
def has_changed(self, *args, **kwargs):
self._get_changed_data(*args, **kwargs)
# If group is in changed_data, but no other fields are filled in, remove group so
# the form will not be validated or saved
if 'group' in self._changed_data and len(self._changed_data) == 1:
contains_data = False
for name in ['ingredient', 'amount', 'unit']:
field = self.fields[name]
prefixed_name = self.add_prefix(name)
data_value = field.widget.value_from_datadict(self.data, self.files, prefixed_name)
if data_value:
contains_data = True
break
if not contains_data:
self._changed_data.remove('group')
return bool(self._changed_data)
Hope this helps anybody in the future!
EDIT:
I edited this answer to reflect Tim Edgars comment.
I realize that this implementation still uses 'private' methods, but I haven't found a cleaner implementation using just the publicly documented methods. But then maybe that is just my own incompetence :).
You could try making all your fields to require a value by setting blank=False. See more here. It should require validation that the values that you care about are not left blank.
If that doesn't work, you can try creating your own custom save method that does the validation that you care about.
def save(self, *args, **kwargs):
# Do your checks on the properties such as self.group, self.amount, etc
# If it is fine then call
super(UsesIngredient, self).save(*args, **kwargs)
Here is an abstract base class for many of my "Treatment" models (TreatmentA, TreatmentB, etc):
class TreatmentBase(models.Model):
URL_PREFIX = '' # child classes define this string
code = shared.models.common.RandomCharField(length=6)
class Meta:
abstract = True
Each Treatment instance has a URL, that when visited by a user, takes them to a page specific to that treatment. I want to be able to create a Treatment in Django Admin, and immediately get this URL so I can send it to users. This URL can be created with the following method on TreatmentBase:
def get_url(self):
return '{}/{}/'.format(self.URL_PREFIX, self.code)
However, I am stuck with how to get this URL to display in Django Admin. I can think of the following solutions:
(1) Customize the display of the code field so that it becomes a clickable URL. Problem: I don't know how to do this.
(2) Add the get_url method to ModelAdmin.list_display. Problem: This means I would have to define a separate list_display for each of the child models of BaseTreatment, and I would have to explicitly list all the fields of the model, meaning I have to update it every time I modify a model, violating DRY.
(3) Add an extra field like this:
url = models.URLField(default = get_url)
Problem: get_url is an instance method (since it needs to refer to the self.code field), and from my reading of the docs about the default argument, it just has to be a simple callable without arguments.
Any way to do this seemingly simple task?
You could go with option 2 (adding to the admin display) but add it to the
readonly_fields which may alleviate your DRY concerns when models changes.
Option 3 (the extra field) could also work if you override the save method setting the URL property. You'd either want to set the field as readonly in the admin or only set the value in the save method if it's currently None.
I have a situation where I need to notify some users when something in DB changes. My idea is to catch pre_save and post_save signal and make some kind of diff and mail that. Generally it works good, but I don't know how to get diff for m2m fields.
At the moment I have something like this:
def pre_save(sender, **kwargs):
pk = kwargs['instance'].pk
instance = copy.deepcopy(sender.objects.get(pk=pk))
tracking[sender] = instance
def post_save(sender, **kwargs):
instance = copy.deepcopy(kwargs['instance'])
print diff(instance, (tracking[sender])) # TODO: don't print, save diff somewhere
Diff function should work for every model (at the mommet I have four model classes). With deepcopy I can save old model, but I don't know how to save m2m fields because they are in separate table (yes, I know I can get this data, but at the momment of execution I don't know what fields are m2m and I wouldn't like to create different slot for every model). What I would like is generic solution, so I can just add models later without thinking about notification part.
My plan is to call get_data() and clear_data() functions after save() in view to clean diff that slots have generated.
Is this good way of doing this? Is there a better way? Is there django application that can do this job for me?
Excuse my English, it's not my native language.
First of all, you don't need to use deepcopy for this. Re-querying the sender from the database returns a "fresh" object.
def pre_save(sender, **kwargs):
pk = kwargs['instance'].pk
instance = sender.objects.get(pk=pk)
tracking[sender] = instance
You can get a list of all the many-to-many fields for a class, and check the values related to the current instance:
for field in sender._meta.local_many:
values = field.value_from_object(instance).objects.all()
# Now values is a list of related objects, which you can diff