Develop Reference

Python: Define Object within a Class

Very new to Python and could do with some help. How do I go about referencing members in a class?
I have two csv files. One contains a series of parts and associated material ID. The other is a material index that contains materials ID's and some information about that material.
My intention is to create a third file that contains all of the parts, their material Id's and the information if present in the material index.
I have created a class for the material index and am trying to access objects in this class using material Ids from the part file however, this is not working and I am unsure as to why. Any help is appreciated:
class material():
def __init__(self, name, ftu, e, nu):
self.name = name
self.ftu = ftu
self.e = e
self.nu = nu
def extract_FTU_Strain(input_file_parts,input_file_FTU,output_file):
parts = {}
materials = {}
for aline in open(input_file_FTU, 'r'):
comma_split = aline.strip().split(',')
name = comma_split[1]
ftu = comma_split[8]
e = comma_split[9]
nu = comma_split[7]
try:
materials[int(comma_split[0])] = material(comma_split[1],comma_split[8],comma_split[9],comma_split[7])
#materials[comma_split[0]] = material(comma_split[1],comma_split[8],comma_split[9],comma_split[7])
except:
pass
for i in open(input_file_parts, 'r'):
semicolon_split = i.strip().split(';')
material_id = semicolon_split[3]
part = semicolon_split[0]
part_id = semicolon_split[1]
material_name = materials[material_id].name
FTU = materials[material_id].ftu
Stress = materials[material_id].e
output.write(','.join([part,part_id,material_name,material_id,FTU,Stress]) + '\n')
output = open (output_file,'w')
output.write('Part Title, Part Id, Material Id, FTU, e' + '\n')
output.close()
import sys
input_file_parts = '/parttable.csv'
input_file_FTU = '/Material_Index.csv'
output_file = '/PYTHONTESTING123.csv'
extract_FTU_Strain(input_file_parts,input_file_FTU,output_file)

Since in the comments you said your error is in materials[material_id] make material_id an integer as it was an integer when you created the object.
You created it this way
materials[int(comma_split[0])]=...
But later called it without converting material_id to an int. Do this before calling it in your for loop to write in the output.
material_id = int(material_id)

I may have misinterpreted your question, but going off the line 'How do I go about referencing members in a class?' you can reference member variables like so:
class Demonstration:
def __init__(self, a, b):
self.a = a
self.b = b
def printMembers(self):
print self.a, self.b
So inside the class you can use self.someVariable to reference member variables.
If you want to access them outside of the class:
myclass.myvariable
I'll happily edit the answer if I have't quite understood your question or if there is a specific error you are getting.

I did not understand what error you have, could you put the traceback? Anyway, you are creating a class instance at the time of assignment. For more elegant programming, you could simply do:
m = materials(name, ftu, e, nu)
This way you can access the instance variables like this:
m.name
m.ftu
...
And try, except -> pass it's very dangerous

Total newbie... Need help understanding python classes [closed]

Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
My understanding of python is zero to none... Been exhausting myself reading what seems like a hundred different ways to approach this. Below I put the assignment description and my code... As of now I am having trouble using the 'getAnimal()' command. I'm not sure what it does or how it works. Thanks in advance :D
Assignment description: "Write a class definition for a class 'Zoo.' It should have instance variables for animal type, herbivore/carnivore/omnivore, and inside/outside. It should also have a getAnimal() method to show the animals information. Write a separate "ZooDriver" class to a) create three instances of zoo animals, b) get user input on which animal to view (1,2,3)c) show the animal info suing getAnimal()."
~~~~~~~~ My code:
class Zoo:
def __init__(self, animal, animal_type, habitat):
self.animal = animal
self.animal_type = animal_type
self.habitat = habitat
user_input=raw_input("Enter the number 1, 2, or 3 for information on an animal.")
if user_input == "1":
my_animal = Zoo("Giraffe", "herbivore", "outside")
elif user_input == "2":
my_animal = Zoo("Lion", "carnivore", "inside")
elif user_input == "3":
my_animal = Zoo("Bear", "omnivore", "inside")
print "Your animal is a %s, it is a %s, and has an %s habitat." % (my_animal.animal, my_animal.animal_type, my_animal.habitat)

A class defines a type of thing. An instance is one thing of that type. For example, you could say Building is a type of thing.
Let's start with a class named Building:
class Building():
pass
Now, to create an actual building -- an instance -- we call it almost like it was a function:
b1 = Building()
b2 = Building()
b3 = Building()
There, we just created three buildings. They are identical, which isn't very useful. Maybe we can give it a name when we create it, and store it in an instance variable. That requires creating a constructor that takes an argument. All class methods must also take self as its first argument, so our constructor will take two arguments:
class Building():
def __init__(self, name):
self.name = name
Now we can create three different buildings:
b1 = Building("firehouse")
b2 = Building("hospital")
b3 = Building("church")
If we want to create a "driver" class to create three buildings, we can do that pretty easily. If you want to set an instance variable or do some work when you create an instance, you can do that in a constructor. For example, this creates such a class that creates three buildings and stores them in an array:
class Town():
def __init__(self):
self.buildings = [
Building("firehouse"),
Building("hospital"),
Building("church")
]
We now can create a single object that creates three other objects. Hopefully that's enough to get you over the initial hurdle of understanding classes.

OK I will try to answer the main question here: What a class is.
From Google: class /klas/
noun: class; plural noun: classes
1.
a set or category of things having some property or attribute in common and
differentiated from others by kind, type, or quality.
In programming, a class is just that. say, for example you have class Dog. Dogs bark "ruf ruff".
We can define the dog class in python using just that information.
class Dog:
def bark(self):
print "ruf ruff"
To use the class, it is instantiated by calling () its constructor:
Spot = Dog()
We then want Spot to bark, so we call a method of the class:
Spot.bark()
To further explain the details of the code here would be to go outside of the scope of this question.
Further reading:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instance_%28computer_science%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Method_%28computer_programming%29

As a direct answer:
class Zoo(object):
def __init__(self, name="Python Zoo"):
self.name = name
self.animals = list()
def getAnimal(self,index):
index = index - 1 # account for zero-indexing
try:
print("Animal is {0.name}\n Diet: {0.diet}\n Habitat: {0.habitat}".format(
self.animals[index]))
except IndexError:
print("No animal at index {}".format(index+1))
def listAnimals(self,index):
for i,animal in enumerate(self.animals, start=1):
print("{i:>3}: {animal.name}".format(i=i,animal=animal))
class Animal(object):
def __init__(self, name=None, diet=None, habitat=None):
if any([attr is None for attr in [name,diet,habitat]]):
raise ValueError("Must supply values for all attributes")
self.name = name
self.diet = diet
self.habitat = habitat
class ZooDriver(object):
def __init__(self):
self.zoo = Zoo()
self.zoo.animals = [Animal(name="Giraffe", diet="Herbivore", habitat="Outside"),
Animal(name="Lion", diet="Carnivore", habitat="Inside"),
Animal(name="Bear", diet="Herbivore", habitat="Inside")]
def run(self):
while True:
print("1. List Animals")
print("2. Get information about an animal (by index)"
print("3. Quit")
input_correct = False
while not input_correct:
in_ = input(">> ")
if in_ in ['1','2','3']:
input_correct = True
{'1':self.zoo.listAnimals,
'2':lambda x: self.zoo.getAnimal(input("index #: ")),
'3': self.exit}[in_]()
else:
print("Incorrect input")
def exit(self):
return
if __name__ == "__main__":
ZooDriver().run()
I haven't actually run this code so some silly typos may have occurred and the usual "off-by-one" errors (oops), but I'm fairly confident in it. It displays a lot of concepts your instructor won't expect you to have mastered yet (such as string formatting, most likely, and almost certainly hash tables with lambdas). For that reason, I STRONGLY recommend you not copy this code to turn in.

Python: Preventing duplication of data when using dictionaries and lists

Hello Stack Overflow!
I am executing a simple command in a program that compiles a report of all the books contained in a library. The library contains a list of shelves, each shelves contains a dictionary of books. However, despite my best efforts, I am always duplicating all my books and placing them on every shelf, instead of the shelf I've instructed the program to place the book on.
I expect I have missed out on some kind of fundamental rule with object creation and organization.
I believe the culprits are the enshelf and unshelf methods in the book class.
Thank you so much for your time,
Jake
Code below:
class book():
shelf_number = None
def __init__(self, title, author):
super(book, self).__init__()
self.title = title
self.author = author
def enshelf(self, shelf_number):
self.shelf_number = shelf_number
SPL.shelves[self.shelf_number].books[hash(self)] = self
def unshelf(self):
del SPL.shelves[self.shelf_number].books[hash(self)]
return self
def get_title(self):
return self.title
def get_author(self):
return self.author
class shelf():
books = {}
def __init__(self):
super(shelf, self).__init__()
def get_books(self):
temp_list = []
for k in self.books.keys():
temp_list.append(self.books[k].get_title())
return temp_list
class library():
shelves = []
def __init__(self, name):
super(library, self).__init__()
self.name = name
def make_shelf(self):
temp = shelf()
self.shelves.append(temp)
def remove_shelf(shelf_number):
del shelves[shelf_number]
def report_all_books(self):
temp_list = []
for x in range(0,len(self.shelves)):
temp_list.append(self.shelves[x].get_books())
print(temp_list)
#---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#----------------------SEATTLE PUBLIC LIBARARY -----------------------------------------
#---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SPL = library("Seattle Public Library")
for x in range(0,3):
SPL.make_shelf()
b1 = book("matterhorn","karl marlantes")
b2 = book("my life","bill clinton")
b3 = book("decision points","george bush")
b1.enshelf(0)
b2.enshelf(1)
b3.enshelf(2)
print(SPL.report_all_books())
b1.unshelf()
b2.unshelf()
b3.unshelf()
OUTPUT:
[['decision points', 'my life', 'matterhorn'], ['decision points', 'my life', 'matterhorn'], ['decision points', 'my life', 'matterhorn']]
None
[Finished in 0.1s]
..instead of [["decision points"],["my life"],["matterhorn"]]

Use dict.pop() instead of del.
Add self.books = {} to shelf's __init__. Don't declare books outside of the __init__, because if you do so, all of the instances of that class are going to refer to the same thing. Instead, this makes each instance have its own dictionary, which is of course what you want since a book can't be in two shelves at once.
Do the same for library and its shelves and book and its shelf_number.
Pass a library instance as an argument to enshelf and unshelf. When you refer to SPL from within your objects' methods, Python finds that there is no local SPL defined, so it searches for one outside of the local scope; but if you were to try to assign something to SPL or do some other sort of mutative business, you would get an UnboundLocalError.
Bonuses:
class book(object), class shelf(object), and class library(object). (Won't fix your problem, but you should do that anyway.)
You don't need to hash the keys before using them, they will be hashed (if they are hashable, but if you're hashing them, then they are).
There is no need to call super() unless you are inheriting from something, in which case you can delegate a method call to a parent or sibling using it - but you aren't doing that.
get_books() can be implemented as nothing more than return [self.books[k].get_title() for k in self.books.iterkeys()]
Likewise for report_all_books(): return [shlf.get_books() for shlf in self.shelves]. Note that I am not iterating over the indices, but rather over the elements themselves. Try for c in "foobar": print(c) in the interactive shell if you want to see for yourself.

Python Accessing Dict That Has Defualt Values That Have Been Updated

So I have this class:
class hero():
def __init__(self, name="Jimmy", prof="Warrior", weapon="Sword"):
"""Constructor for hero"""
self.name = name
self.prof = prof
self.weapon = weapon
self.herodict = {
"Name": self.name,
"Class": self.prof,
"Weapon": self.weapon
}
self.herotext = {
"Welcome": "Greetings, hero. What is thine name? ",
"AskClass": "A fine name, {Name}. What is your class? ",
"AskWeapon": "A {Class}, hmm? What shalt thy weapon be? ",
}
def setHeroDicts(self, textkey, herokey):
n = raw_input(self.herotext[textkey].format(**self.herodict))
if n == "":
n = self.herodict[herokey]
self.herodict[herokey] = n
#print self.herodict[herokey]
def heroMake(self):
h = hero()
h.setHeroDicts("Welcome", "Name")
h.setHeroDicts("AskClass", "Class")
h.setHeroDicts("AskWeapon", "Weapon")
And in another class I have this executing
def Someclass(self):
h = hero()
print h.herodict["Class"]
h.heroMake()
print h.getClass()
if "Mage" in h.herodict["Class"]:
print "OMG MAGE"
elif "Warrior" in h.herodict["Class"]:
print "Warrior!"
else:
print "NONE"
So if I input nothing each time, it will result in a blank user input, and give the default values. But if I put an input, then it will change the herodict values to what I customize. My problem is, if I try and access those updated values in Someclass it only gives me the default values instead of the new ones. How do I go about accessing the updated values?

The main issue with your class is that you are creating a new object within heromake instead of using the existing one. You can fix this by replacing h with self (so that each time you are calling setHeroDicts on the object):
def heromake(self):
self.setHeroDicts("Welcome", "Name")
self.setHeroDicts("AskClass", "Class")
self.setHeroDicts("AskWeapon", "Weapon")
The first argument to a method is always set to the instance itself, so if you want to interact with the instance or mutate it, you need to use it directly. When you do h = hero() in your original code, you create a whole new hero object, manipulate it and then it disappears when control passes back to your function.
A few other notes: you should name your classes with CamelCase, so it's easier to tell they are classes (e.g., you should really have class Hero) and in python 2, you need to make your classes descend from object (so class Hero(object)). Finally, you are duplicating nearly the entire point of having classes with your herodict, you should consider accessing the attributes of the object directly, instead of having the intermediary herodict (e.g., instead of doing h.herodict["Class"] you could do h.prof directly.

Instantiating a unique object every time when using object composition?

As an example, just a couple of dummy objects that will be used together. FWIW this is using Python 2.7.2.
class Student(object):
def __init__(self, tool):
self.tool = tool
def draw(self):
if self.tool.broken != True:
print "I used my tool. Sweet."
else:
print "My tool is broken. Wah."
class Tool(object):
def __init__(self, name):
self.name = name
self.broken = False
def break(self):
print "The %s busted." % self.name
self.broken = True
Hammer = Tool(hammer)
Billy = Student(Hammer)
Tommy = Student(Hammer)
That's probably enough code, you see where I'm going with this. If I call Hammer.break(), I'm calling it on the same instance of the object; if Billy's hammer is broken, so is Tommy's (it's really the same Hammer after all).
Now obviously if the program were limited to just Billy and Tommy as instances of Students, the fix would be obvious - instantiate more Hammers. But clearly I'm asking because it isn't that simple, heh. I would like to know if it's possible to create objects which show up as unique instances of themselves for every time they're called into being.
EDIT: The kind of answers I'm getting lead me to believe that I have a gaping hole in my understanding of instantiation. If I have something like this:
class Foo(object):
pass
class Moo(Foo):
pass
class Guy(object):
def __init__(self, thing):
self.thing = thing
Bill = Guy(Moo())
Steve = Guy(Moo())
Each time I use Moo(), is that a separate instance, or do they both reference the same object? If they're separate, then my whole question can be withdrawn, because it'll ahve to make way for my mind getting blown.

You have to create new instances of the Tool for each Student.
class Student(object):
def __init__(self, tool):
self.tool = tool
def draw(self):
if self.tool.broken != True:
print "I used my tool. Sweet."
else:
print "My tool is broken. Wah."
class Tool(object):
def __init__(self, name):
self.name = name
self.broken = False
def break(self):
print "The %s busted." % self.name
self.broken = True
# Instead of instance, make it a callable that returns a new one
def Hammer():
return Tool('hammer')
# Pass a new object, instead of the type
Billy = Student(Hammer())
Tommy = Student(Hammer())

I'll try to be brief. Well.. I always try to be brief, but my level of success is pretty much random.randint(0, never). So yeah.
Lol. You even failed to be brief about announcing that you will try to be brief.
First, we need to be clear about what "called into being" means. Presumably you want a new hammer every time self.tool = object happens. You don't want a new instance every time, for example, you access the tool attribute, or you'd always a get a new, presumably unbroken, hammer every time you check self.tool.broken.
A couple approaches.
One, give Tool a copy method that produces a new object that should equal the original object, but be a different instance. For example:
class Tool:
def __init__(self, kind):
self.kind = kind
self.broken = False
def copy(self):
result = Tool(self.kind)
result.broken = self.broken
return result
Then in Student's init you say
self.tool = tool.copy()
Option two, use a factory function.
def makehammer():
return Tool(hammer)
class Student:
def __init__(self, factory):
self.tool = factory()
Billy = Student(makehammer)
I can't think any way in Python that you can write the line self.tool = object and have object automagically make a copy, and I don't think you want to. One thing I like about Python is WYSIWYG. If you want magic use C++. I think it makes code hard to understand when you not only can't tell what a line of code is doing, you can't even tell it's doing anything special.
Note you can get even fancier with a factory object. For example:
class RealisticFactory:
def __init__(self, kind, failurerate):
self.kind = kind
self.failurerate = failurerate
def make(self):
result = Tool(self.kind)
if random.random() < self.failurerate:
result.broken = True
if (self.failurerate < 0.01):
self.failurerate += 0.0001
return result
factory = RealisticFactory(hammer, 0.0007)
Billy = Student(factory.make)
Tommy = Student(factory.make) # Tommy's tool is slightly more likely to be broken

You could change your lines like this:
Billy = Student(Tool('hammer'))
Tommy = Student(Tool('hammer'))
That'll produce a distinct instance of your Tool class for each instance of the Student class. the trouble with your posted example code is that you haven't "called the Tool into being" (to use your words) more than once.

Just call Tool('hammer') every time you want to create a new tool.
h1 = Tool('hammer')
h2 = Tool('hammer')
Billy = Student(h1)
Tommy = Student(h2)

Oh wait, I forgot, Python does have magic.
class Student:
def __setattr__(self, attr, value):
if attr == 'tool':
self.__dict__[attr] = value.copy()
else:
self.__dict__[attr] = value
But I still say you should use magic sparingly.

After seeing the tenor of the answers here and remembering the Zen of Python, I'm going to answer my own dang question by saying, "I probably should have just thought harder about it."
I will restate my own question as the answer. Suppose I have this tiny program:
class Item(object):
def __init__(self):
self.broken = False
def smash(self):
print "This object broke."
self.broken = True
class Person(object):
def __init__(self, holding):
self.holding = holding
def using(self):
if self.holding.broken != True:
print "Pass."
else:
print "Fail."
Foo = Person(Item())
Bar = Person(Item())
Foo.holding.smash()
Foo.using()
Bar.using()
The program will return "Fail" for Foo.using() and "Pass" for Bar.using(). Upon actually thinking about what I'm doing, "Foo.holding = Item()" and "Bar.holding = Item()" are clearly different instances. I even ran this dumpy program to prove it worked as I surmised it did, and no surprises to you pros, it does. So I withdraw my question on the basis that I wasn't actually using my brain when I asked it. The funny thing is, with the program I've been working on, I was already doing it this way but assuming it was the wrong way to do it. So thanks for humoring me.