Installing Python Package from Github Using PIP - python

I've seen it documented that you can install a Github hosting Python package using pip via:
sudo pip install -e git+git://github.com/myuser/myproject.git#egg=myproject
However, this appears to install the package to the current working directory, which is almost never where is should be.
How do you instruct pip to install it into the standard Python package directory (e.g. on Ubuntu this is /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages)?

The -e flag tells pip to install it as "editable", i.e. keep the source around. Drop the -e flag and it should do about what you expect.
sudo pip install git+git://github.com/myuser/myproject.git#egg=myproject
If that doesn't work try using https instead of git.
sudo pip install git+https://github.com/myuser/myproject.git#egg=myproject

For Python 3 make sure you have python3-pip installed (and of course git installed):
The syntax just changed to:
sudo pip3 install git+git://github.com/someuser/someproject.git

Related

Pip doesn't require root user to install but requires root user to upgrade

I'm confused by the intended pip usage. Pip comes installed with Python, which is great, but I get the following warnings when new versions come out:
WARNING: You are using pip version 21.1.1; however, version 21.1.3 is available.
You should consider upgrading via the '/usr/local/opt/python#3.8/bin/python3.8 -m pip install --upgrade pip' command.
I follow the instructions to install it using the command they gave. But then it uninstalls my existing pip and is not able to install the new version.
Installing collected packages: pip
Attempting uninstall: pip
Found existing installation: pip 21.1.1
Uninstalling pip-21.1.1:
ERROR: Could not install packages due to an OSError: Cannot move the non-empty directory '/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/pip-21.1.1.dist-info/': Lacking write permission to '/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/pip-21.1.1.dist-info/'.
The pip command is now unrecognized, and the official documentation for upgrading pip suggests running:
python -m pip install -U pip
which gives the same permission error.
I Google this error, and found that the community highly advises to not sudo from these questions (this and this). They also advised pip3 install --upgrade pip --user which also gave the same error. The common consensus is to only install pip packages inside virtual environments, but I'm hesitant to have pip completely uninstalled.
So I got pip to install using sudo, but it's unclear whether I've inadvertently affected (or will affect future) system-wide installations, or how I'd check for these.
I don't understand why installing pip inside /usr/local/ requires sudo, and whether I should only be using pip exclusively inside virtual environments and never outside it
pip can be installed with sudo, into a folder that you don't have permissions to write to. However, it can install packages outside of that folder (and thus, into a folder you have write permissions). However, it is recommended that you don't install pip into a root folder, and instead install it into your home directory.
The command to install pip as root is
sudo apt-get install pip
It should then prompt you for your password. I recommend using sudo whenever you install something.

Pip Install keeps installing libraries to Python2.7 rather than Python3

I'm trying to install modules such as gitpython into my Python3 directory however when I run:
Pip install gitpython it automatically downloads it into python2.7
I've tried specify the Python3 directory but it says the the library has already been installed.
Requirement already satisfied: gitpython in /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages (2.1.11)
Problem is when I try to call from git import repo my Python3 can't find the module.
Is there anyway to get pip to install my libraries to Python3 as a default, can I just uninstall Python 2.7 to save problems?
I run
sudo apt install python3-pip
and it states it is already installed, so I run sudo pip3 install gitpython and it says Command 'pip3' not found, but can be installed with:
sudo apt install python3-pip
SOLUTION
sudo apt-get remove python3-pip; sudo apt-get install python3-pip
It depends of your version of pip. But I think that python3-pip may do the trick.
sudo apt-get install python3-pip
sudo pip3 install MODULE_NAME
You should use pip3 to install your packages in your python3 environment. thus instead of installing with pip use pip3 install gitpython
You can try to see the version of python with:
python --version
if the result is python 2.7, that means that your environment variable for python3 needs to be set.
After that you can try:
python -m pip install package_name
I hope it will help you =)
Adrien
You should use python3 venv Python 3 venv
python3 -m venv /path/virtual/environment
source /path/virtual/environment/bin/activate
or use pip3 to installing any libraries for python 3
$ pip3 install 'some library'
You should create virtual environment for python3. using:
virtualenv -p /usr/bin/python3 <VIRTUAL_ENV NAME>
Then activate it using:
source <VIRTUAL_ENV NAME>/bin/activate
Then install your dependency(gitpython in your case) into that.

pip 10 and apt: how to avoid "Cannot uninstall X" errors for distutils packages

I am dealing with a legacy Dockerfile. Here is a very simplified version of what I am dealing with:
FROM ubuntu:14.04
RUN apt-get -y update && apt-get -y install \
python-pip \
python-numpy # ...and many other packages
RUN pip install -U pip
RUN pip install -r /tmp/requirements1.txt # includes e.g., numpy==1.13.0
RUN pip install -r /tmp/requirements2.txt
RUN pip install -r /tmp/requirements3.txt
First, several packages are installed using apt, and then several packages are installed using pip. pip version 10 has been released, and part of the release is this new restriction:
Removed support for uninstalling projects which have been installed using distutils. distutils installed projects do not include metadata indicating what files belong to that install and thus it is impossible to actually uninstall them rather than just remove the metadata saying they've been installed while leaving all of the actual files behind.
This leads to the following problem in my setup. For example, first apt installs python-numpy. Later pip tries to install a newer version of numpy from e.g., /tmp/requirements1.txt, and tries to uninstall the older version, but because of the new restriction, it cannot remove this version:
Installing collected packages: numpy
Found existing installation: numpy 1.8.2
Cannot uninstall 'numpy'. It is a distutils installed project and thus we cannot accurately determine which files belong to it which would lead to only a partial uninstall.
Now I know at this point there are several solutions.
I could not install python-numpy through apt. However, this causes issues because python-numpy installs a few different packages as requirements, and I do not know if another part of the system relies on these packages. And in reality, there are several apt packages installed through the Dockerfile, and each one I remove seems to reveal another Cannot uninstall X error, and removes a number of other packages along with it, that our app may or may not rely on.
I could also use the --ignore-installed option when I try to pip install things that have already been installed through apt, but then again I have the same problem of every --ignore-installed argument revealing yet another thing that needs to be ignored.
I could pin pip at an older version that does not have this restriction, but I don't want to be stuck using an outdated version of pip forever.
I have been going around in circles trying to come up with a good solution that involves minimal changes to this legacy Dockerfile, and allows the app we deploy with that file to continue to function as it has been. Any suggestions as to how I can safely get around this problem of pip 10 not being able to install newer versions of distutils packages? Thank you!
UPDATE:
I did not realize that --ignore-installed could be used without a package as an argument to ignore all installed packages. I am considering whether or not this might be a good option for me, and have asked about it here.
This is the solution I ended up going with, and our apps have been running in production without any issues for close to a month with this fix in place:
All I had to do was to add
--ignore-installed
to the pip install lines in my dockerfile that were raising errors. Using the same dockerfile example from my original question, the fixed dockerfile would look something like:
FROM ubuntu:14.04
RUN apt-get -y update && apt-get -y install \
python-pip \
python-numpy # ...and many other packages
RUN pip install -U pip
RUN pip install -r /tmp/requirements1.txt --ignore-installed # don't try to uninstall existing packages, e.g., numpy
RUN pip install -r /tmp/requirements2.txt
RUN pip install -r /tmp/requirements3.txt
The documentation I could find for --ignore-installed was unclear in my opinion (pip install --help simply says "Ignore the installed packages (reinstalling instead)."), and I asked about the potential dangers of this flag here, but have yet to get satisfying answer. However, if there are any negative side effects, our production environment has yet to see the effects of them, and I think the risk is low/none (at least that has been our experience). I was able to confirm that in our case, when this flag was used, the existing installation was not uninstalled, but that the newer installation was always used.
Update:
I wanted to highlight this answer by #ivan_pozdeev. He provides some information that this answer does not include, and he also outlines some potential side-effects of my solution.
This is what worked for me--
pip install --ignore-installed <Your package name>
or
sudo pip install --ignore-installed <Your package name>
or (inside jupyter notebook)
import sys
!{sys.executable} -m pip install --ignore-installed <Your package name>
For windows
write
conda update --all
pip install --upgrade <Your package name>
OR
conda update --all
pip install <Your package name>
OR
pip install wrapt --upgrade --ignore-installed
pip install <Your package name>
from ERROR: Cannot uninstall 'wrapt'. during upgrade
You can just remove numpy manually but keep the other dependencies installed by apt. Then use pip as before to install the latest version of numpy.
#Manually remove just numpy installed by distutils
RUN rm /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/numpy-1.8.2.egg-info
RUN rm -r /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/numpy
RUN pip install -U pip
RUN pip install -r /tmp/requirements1.txt
The location of numpy should be the same. But if you want to confirm the location you can run the container without running the requirements.txt files and issue the following commands in the python console inside the container.
>>> import numpy
>>> print numpy.__file__
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/numpy/__init__.pyc

How to override the pip command to Python3.x instead of Python2.7?

I am using OSX and I have pip installed for both Python3.5 and Python2.7. I know I can run the command pip2 to use Python2 and when I use the command pip3 Python3.x will be used.
The problem is that the default of pip is set to Python2.7 and I want it to be Python3.x.
How can I change that?
edit:
No, I am not running a virtual environment yet. If it was a virtual environment I could just run Python3.x and forget all about Python2.7, unfortunately since OSX requires Python2.7 for it's use I can't do that. Hence why I'm asking this.
Thanks for the answer. I however don't want to change what running python does. Instead I would like to change the path that running pip takes. At the moment pip -V shows me pip 8.1.2 from /Library/Python/2.7/site-packages (python 2.7), but I am looking for pip 8.1.2 from /Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.5/lib/python3.5/site-packages (python 3.5) I am sure there has to be a way to do this. Any ideas?
Run this:
pip3 install --upgrade --force pip
or even more explicit:
python3 -m pip install --upgrade --force pip
This will install pip for Python 3 and make Python 3 version of pip default.
Validate with:
pip -V
I always just run it via Python itself, this way:
python3 -m pip install some_module
or
python2 -m pip install some_module
The -m calls the __main__.py module of a specified package. Pip supports this.
Can't you alias pip='pip3' in your ~/.bash_profile?
In Terminal, run nano ~/.bash_profile, then add a line to the end that reads alias pip='pip3'. This is safe; it won't affect system processes, only your terminal.
For your projects, you should be using a virtualenv.
You can choose which python will be that of the virtualenv at creation time, by specifying it on the command line:
virtualenv -p python3 env
# then
. env/bin/activate
python # ← will run python3
That python interpreter will be the one used when you run python or pip while the virtualenv is active.
Under the hood, activating the virtualenv will:
modify your PATH environment setting so binaries in env/bin
override those from your system.
modify your PYTHONHOME
environment setting so python modules are loaded from env/lib.
So python, pip and any other package you install with pip will be run from the virtualenv, with the python version you chose and the package versions you installed in the virtualenv.
Other than this, running python without using virtualenv will just run the default python of the system, which you cannot usually change as it would break a lot of system scripts.
It works for me:
As super-user
Uninstall pip
sudo pip uninstall pip
Install pip
sudo python3 -m pip install --upgrade --force pip
Check install path
sudo pip -V
As local-user
Uninstall pip
pip uninstall pip
Install pip
python3 -m pip install --upgrade --force pip
Check install path
pip -V
Although PEP 394 does not specifically mention pip, it does discuss a number of other Python-related commands (including python itself). The short version is that, for reasons of backwards compatibility, the unversioned commands should refer to Python 2.x for the immediate future on most reasonable systems.
Generally, these aliases are implemented as symbolic links, and you can just flip the symlink to point at the version you want (e.g. with ln -f -s $(which pip3) $(which pip) as root). But it may not be a good idea if you have any software that expects to interact with Python 2 (which may be more than you think since a lot of software interacts with Python).
The saner option is to set up a Virtualenv with Python 3. Then, within the Virtualenv, all Python-related commands will refer to 3.x instead of 2.x. This will not break the system, unlike the previous paragraph which could well break things.
Since you have specified in the comments you want syntax like pip install [package] to work, here is a solution:
Install setuptools for Python3: apt-get install python3-setuptools
Now pip for Python3 could be installed by: python3 -m easy_install pip
Now you can use pip with the specific version of Python to
install package for Python 3 by: pip-3.2 install [package]
Why not just repoint the link /bin/python to python3? It seems like the easiest solution. Especially if you want it for all users of your system.

ImportError: No module named psycopg2

In installation process of OpenERP 6, I want to generate a config file with these commands:
cd /home/openerp/openerp-server/bin/
./openerp-server.py -s --stop-after-init -c /home/openerp/openerp-server.cfg
But it always showed the message: ImportError: No module named psycopg2
When I checked for psycopg2 package, it's already installed. Package python-psycopg2-2.4.5-1.rhel5.x86_64 is already installed to its latest version. Nothing to do. What's wrong with this? My server is CentOS, I've installed Python 2.6.7.
Step 1: Install the dependencies
sudo apt-get install build-dep python-psycopg2
Step 2: Run this command in your virtualenv
pip install psycopg2-binary
Ref: Fernando Munoz
Use psycopg2-binary instead of psycopg2.
pip install psycopg2-binary
Or you will get the warning below:
UserWarning: The psycopg2 wheel package will be renamed from release 2.8; in order to keep installing from binary please use "pip install psycopg2-binary" instead. For details see: http://initd.org/psycopg/docs/install.html#binary-install-from-pypi.
Reference: Psycopg 2.7.4 released | Psycopg
I faced the same issue and resolved it with following commands:
sudo apt-get install libpq-dev
pip install psycopg2
Try installing
psycopg2-binary
with
pip install psycopg2-binary --user
Please try to run the command import psycopg2 on the python console. If you get the error then check the sys.path where the python look for the install module. If the parent directory of the python-psycopg2-2.4.5-1.rhel5.x86_64 is there in the sys.path or not. If its not in the sys.path then run export PYTHONPATH=<parent directory of python-psycopg2-2.4.5-1.rhel5.x86_64> before running the openerp server.
Import Error on Mac OS
If psycopg2 is getting installed but you are unable to import it in your .py file then the problem is libpq, its linkages, and the library openssl, on which libpq depends upon. The overall steps are reproduced below. You can check it step by step to know which is the source of error for you and then you can troubleshoot from there.
Check for the installation of the openssl and make sure it's working.
Check for installation of libpq in your system it may not have been installed or not linked. If not installed then install it using the command brew install libpq. This installs libpq library. As per the documentation
libpq is the C application programmer's interface to PostgreSQL. libpq is a set of library functions that allow client programs to pass queries to the PostgreSQL backend server and to receive the results of these queries.
Link libpq using brew link libpq, if this doesn't work then use the command: brew link libpq --force.
Also put in your .zshrc file the following export PATH="/usr/local/opt/libpq/bin:$PATH". This creates all the necessary linkages for libpq library .
Now restart the terminal or use the following command source ~/.zshrc.
Now use the command pip install psycopg2. It will work.
This works, even when you are working in conda environment.
N.B. pip install psycopg2-binaryshould be avoided because as per the developers of the psycopg2 library
The use of the -binary packages in production is discouraged because in the past they proved unreliable in multithread environments. This might have been fixed in more recent versions but I have never managed to reproduce the failure.
Try with these:
virtualenv -p /usr/bin/python3 test_env
source test_env/bin/activate
pip install psycopg2
run python and try to import if you insist on installing it on your systems python try:
pip3 install psycopg2
Recently faced this issue on my production server. I had installed pyscopg2 using
sudo pip install psycopg2
It worked beautifully on my local, but had me for a run on my ec2 server.
sudo python -m pip install psycopg2
The above command worked for me there. Posting here just in case it would help someone in future.
sudo pip install psycopg2-binary
You need to install the psycopg2 module.
On CentOS:
Make sure Python 2.7+ is installed. If not, follow these instructions: http://toomuchdata.com/2014/02/16/how-to-install-python-on-centos/
# Python 2.7.6:
$ wget http://python.org/ftp/python/2.7.6/Python-2.7.6.tar.xz
$ tar xf Python-2.7.6.tar.xz
$ cd Python-2.7.6
$ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --enable-unicode=ucs4 --enable-shared LDFLAGS="-Wl,-rpath /usr/local/lib"
$ make && make altinstall
$ yum install postgresql-libs
# First get the setup script for Setuptools:
$ wget https://bitbucket.org/pypa/setuptools/raw/bootstrap/ez_setup.py
# Then install it for Python 2.7 and/or Python 3.3:
$ python2.7 ez_setup.py
$ easy_install-2.7 psycopg2
Even though this is a CentOS question, here are the instructions for Ubuntu:
$ sudo apt-get install python3-pip python-distribute python-dev
$ easy_install psycopg2
Cite: http://initd.org/psycopg/install/
For python3 on ubuntu, this worked for me:
$sudo apt-get update
$sudo apt-get install libpq-dev
$sudo pip3 install psycopg2-binary
i have the same problem, but this piece of snippet alone solved my problem.
pip install psycopg2
Run into the same issue when I switch to Ubuntu from Windows 10.. the following worked for me.. this after googling and trying numerous suggestions for 2 hours...
sudo apt-get install libpq-dev
then
pip3 install psycopg2
I hope this helps someone who has encountered the same problem especially when switching for windows OS to Linux(Ubuntu).
I have done 2 things to solve this issue:
use Python 3.6 instead of 3.8.
change Django version to 2.2 (may be working with some higher but I change to 2.2)
For Python3
Step 1: Install Dependencies
sudo apt-get install python3 python-dev python3-dev
Step 2: Install
pip install psycopg2
check correctly if you had ON your virtual env of your peoject, if it's OFF then make it ON. execute following cammands:
workon <your_env_name>
python manage.py runserver
It's working for me
It's very simple, not sure why nobody mentioned this for mac before.
brew install postgresql
pip3 install psycopg2
In simple terms, psycopg2 wants us to install postgres first.
PS: Don't forget to upvote, so that it can help other people as well.
Solved the issue with below solution :
Basically the issue due to _bz2.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so Linux package file. Try to find the the location.
Check the install python location ( which python3)- Example: /usr/local/bin/python3
copy the file under INSTALL_LOCATION/lib/python3.6
cp -rvp /usr/lib64/python3.6/lib-dynload/_bz2.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so /usr/local/lib/python3.6
try:
pip install psycopg2 --force-reinstall --no-cache-dir
Python2 importerror no module named psycopg2
pip install psycopg2-binary
Requirement already satisfied...
Solved by following steps:
sudo curl https://bootstrap.pypa.io/pip/2.7/get-pip.py -o get-pip.py
sudo python get-pip.py
sudo python -m pip install psycopg2-binary
pip install psycopg-binary
The line above helped me
For Python3 use this:
sudo apt-get install -y python3-psycopg2

Categories

Resources