I am working on a program that simulates wave motion along a 1-dimensional string to eventually simulate different wave packets. I found a program in the book "Python Scripting for Computational Science" that claims to describe wave motion, though I'm not certain how to implement it (the book was on Google Books and won't show me the text before/after the code).
For example, I understand that "f" is a function of x and t and that "I" is a function of x but what functions are actually needed to produce a wave?
I=
f=
c=
L=
n=
dt=
tstop=
x = linespace(0,L,n+1) #grid points in x dir
dx = L/float(n)
if dt <= 0: dt = dx/float(c) #max step time
C2 = (c*dt/dx)**2 #help variable in the scheme
dt2 = dt*dt
up = zeros(n+1) #NumPy solution array
u = up.copy() #solution at t-dt
um = up.copy() #solution at t-2*dt
t = 0.0
for i in iseq(0,n):
u[i] +0.5*C2*(u[i-1] - 2*u[i] +u[i+1]) + \
dt2*f(x[i], t)
um[0] = 0; um[n] = 0
while t<= tstop:
t_old = t; t+=dt
#update all inner points:
for i in iseq(start=1, stop= n-1):
up[i] = -um[i] +2*u[i] + \
C2*(u[i-1] - 2*u[i] + u[i+1]) + \
dt2*f(x[i], t_old)
#insert boundary conditions
up[0] = 0; up[n] = 0
#updata data structures for next step
um = u.copy(); u = up.copy()
The code below should work:
from math import sin, pi
from numpy import zeros, linspace
from scitools.numpyutils import iseq
def I(x):
return sin(2*x*pi/L)
def f(x,t):
return 0
def solver0(I, f, c, L, n, dt, tstop):
# f is a function of x and t, I is a function of x
x = linspace(0, L, n+1) # grid points in x dir
dx = L/float(n)
if dt <= 0: dt = dx/float(c) # max time step
C2 = (c*dt/dx)**2 # help variable in the scheme
dt2 = dt*dt
up = zeros(n+1) # NumPy solution array
u = up.copy() # solution at t-dt
um = up.copy() # solution at t-2*dt
t = 0.0
for i in iseq(0,n):
u[i] = I(x[i])
for i in iseq(1,n-1):
um[i] = u[i] + 0.5*C2*(u[i-1] - 2*u[i] + u[i+1]) + \
dt2*f(x[i], t)
um[0] = 0; um[n] = 0
while t <= tstop:
t_old = t; t += dt
# update all inner points:
for i in iseq(start=1, stop=n-1):
up[i] = - um[i] + 2*u[i] + \
C2*(u[i-1] - 2*u[i] + u[i+1]) + \
dt2*f(x[i], t_old)
# insert boundary conditions:
up[0] = 0; up[n] = 0
# update data structures for next step
um = u.copy(); u = up.copy()
return u
if __name__ == '__main__':
# When choosing the parameters you should also check that the units are correct
c = 5100
L = 1
n = 10
dt = 0.1
tstop = 1
a = solver0(I, f, c, L, n, dt, tstop)
It returns an array with the values of the wave at time tstop and at all the points in our solution grid.
Before you apply it to a practical situation, you should read up both about the wave equation and the finite element method to understand what the code does. It can be used to find the numerical solutions of the wave equation:
Utt + beta*Ut = c^2*Uxx + f(x,t)
which is one of most important differential equations in physics. The solution of this PDE or wave, is given by a function which is a function of space and time u(x,t).
To visualize the concept of wave, consider two dimensions, space and time. If you fix the time, e.g. t1, you will get a function of x:
U(x) = U(x,t=t1)
However, at a particular point of space, x1, the wave is a function of time:
U(t) = U(x=x1, t)
This should help you to understand how the wave propagates. In order to find a solution, you need to impose some initial and boundary conditions to restrict all the possibles waves to the one you are interested in. For this particular case:
I = I(xi) is the initial force that we will apply to get the
perturbation/wave going.
The term f = f(x,t) accounts for any external force that generates
waves.
c is wave velocity; it is a constant (assuming the medium is
homogeneous).
L is the length of the domain where we want to solve the PDE; also
a constant.
n is the number of grid points in space.
dt is a time step.
tstop is the stop time.
Related
I need to implement a stochastic algorithm that provides as output the times and the states at the corresponding time points of a dynamic system. We include randomness in defining the time points by retrieving a random number from the uniform distribution. What I want to do, is to find the state at time points 0,1,2,...,24. Given the randomness of the algorithm, the time points 1, 2, 3,...,24 are not necessarily hit. We my include rounding at two decimal places, but even with rounding I can not find/insert all of these time points. The question is, how to change the code so as to be able to include in the list of the time points the numbers 1, 2,..., 24 while preserving the stochasticity of the algorithm ? Thanks for any suggestion.
import numpy as np
import random
import math as m
np.random.seed(seed = 5)
# Stoichiometric matrix
S = np.array([(-1, 0), (1, -1)])
# Reaction parameters
ke = 0.3; ka = 0.5
k = [ke, ka]
# Initial state vector at time t0
X1 = [200]; X2 = [0]
# We will update it for each time.
X = [X1, X2]
# Initial time is t0 = 0, which we will update.
t = [0]
# End time
tfinal = 24
# The propensity vector R concerning the last/updated value of time
def ReactionRates(k, X1, X2):
R = np.zeros((2,1))
R[0] = k[1] * X1[-1]
R[1] = k[0] * X2[-1]
return R
# We implement the Gillespie (SSA) algorithm
while True:
# Reaction propensities/rates
R = ReactionRates(k,X1,X2)
propensities = R
propensities_sum = sum(R)[0]
if propensities_sum == 0:
break
# we include randomness
u1 = np.random.uniform(0,1)
delta_t = (1/propensities_sum) * m.log(1/u1)
if t[-1] + delta_t > tfinal:
break
t.append(t[-1] + delta_t)
b = [0,R[0], R[1]]
u2 = np.random.uniform(0,1)
# Choose j
lambda_u2 = propensities_sum * u2
for j in range(len(b)):
if sum(b[0:j-1+1]) < lambda_u2 <= sum(b[1:j+1]):
break # out of for j
# make j zero based
j -= 1
# We update the state vector
X1.append(X1[-1] + S.T[j][0])
X2.append(X2[-1] + S.T[j][1])
# round t values
t = [round(tt,2) for tt in t]
print("The time steps:", t)
print("The second component of the state vector:", X2)
After playing with your model, I conclude, that interpolation works fine.
Basically, just append the following lines to your code:
ts = np.arange(tfinal+1)
xs = np.interp(ts, t, X2)
and if you have matplotlib installed, you can visualize using
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
plt.plot(t, X2)
plt.plot(ts, xs)
plt.show()
I am trying to make my own CFD solver and one of the most computationally expensive parts is solving for the pressure term. One way to solve Poisson differential equations faster is by using a multigrid method. The basic recursive algorithm for this is:
function phi = V_Cycle(phi,f,h)
% Recursive V-Cycle Multigrid for solving the Poisson equation (\nabla^2 phi = f) on a uniform grid of spacing h
% Pre-Smoothing
phi = smoothing(phi,f,h);
% Compute Residual Errors
r = residual(phi,f,h);
% Restriction
rhs = restriction(r);
eps = zeros(size(rhs));
% stop recursion at smallest grid size, otherwise continue recursion
if smallest_grid_size_is_achieved
eps = smoothing(eps,rhs,2*h);
else
eps = V_Cycle(eps,rhs,2*h);
end
% Prolongation and Correction
phi = phi + prolongation(eps);
% Post-Smoothing
phi = smoothing(phi,f,h);
end
I've attempted to implement this algorithm myself (also at the end of this question) however it is very slow and doesn't give good results so evidently it is doing something wrong. I've been trying to find why for too long and I think it's just worthwhile seeing if anyone can help me.
If I use a grid size of 2^5 by 2^5 points, then it can solve it and give reasonable results. However, as soon as I go above this it takes exponentially longer to solve and basically get stuck at some level of inaccuracy, no matter how many V-Loops are performed. at 2^7 by 2^7 points, the code takes way too long to be useful.
I think my main issue is that my implementation of a jacobian iteration is using linear algebra to calculate the update at each step. This should, in general, be fast however, the update matrix A is an n*m sized matrix, and calculating the dot product of a 2^7 * 2^7 sized matrix is expensive. As most of the cells are just zeros, should I calculate the result using a different method?
if anyone has any experience in multigrid methods, I would appreciate any advice!
Thanks
my code:
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
"""
Created on Tue Dec 29 16:24:16 2020
#author: mclea
"""
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from scipy.signal import convolve2d
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d import Axes3D
from scipy.interpolate import griddata
from matplotlib import cm
def restrict(A):
"""
Creates a new grid of points which is half the size of the original
grid in each dimension.
"""
n = A.shape[0]
m = A.shape[1]
new_n = int((n-2)/2+2)
new_m = int((m-2)/2+2)
new_array = np.zeros((new_n, new_m))
for i in range(1, new_n-1):
for j in range(1, new_m-1):
ii = int((i-1)*2)+1
jj = int((j-1)*2)+1
# print(i, j, ii, jj)
new_array[i,j] = np.average(A[ii:ii+2, jj:jj+2])
new_array = set_BC(new_array)
return new_array
def interpolate_array(A):
"""
Creates a grid of points which is double the size of the original
grid in each dimension. Uses linear interpolation between grid points.
"""
n = A.shape[0]
m = A.shape[1]
new_n = int((n-2)*2 + 2)
new_m = int((m-2)*2 + 2)
new_array = np.zeros((new_n, new_m))
i = (np.indices(A.shape)[0]/(A.shape[0]-1)).flatten()
j = (np.indices(A.shape)[1]/(A.shape[1]-1)).flatten()
A = A.flatten()
new_i = np.linspace(0, 1, new_n)
new_j = np.linspace(0, 1, new_m)
new_ii, new_jj = np.meshgrid(new_i, new_j)
new_array = griddata((i, j), A, (new_jj, new_ii), method="linear")
return new_array
def adjacency_matrix(rows, cols):
"""
Creates the adjacency matrix for an n by m shaped grid
"""
n = rows*cols
M = np.zeros((n,n))
for r in range(rows):
for c in range(cols):
i = r*cols + c
# Two inner diagonals
if c > 0: M[i-1,i] = M[i,i-1] = 1
# Two outer diagonals
if r > 0: M[i-cols,i] = M[i,i-cols] = 1
return M
def create_differences_matrix(rows, cols):
"""
Creates the central differences matrix A for an n by m shaped grid
"""
n = rows*cols
M = np.zeros((n,n))
for r in range(rows):
for c in range(cols):
i = r*cols + c
# Two inner diagonals
if c > 0: M[i-1,i] = M[i,i-1] = -1
# Two outer diagonals
if r > 0: M[i-cols,i] = M[i,i-cols] = -1
np.fill_diagonal(M, 4)
return M
def set_BC(A):
"""
Sets the boundary conditions of the field
"""
A[:, 0] = A[:, 1]
A[:, -1] = A[:, -2]
A[0, :] = A[1, :]
A[-1, :] = A[-2, :]
return A
def create_A(n,m):
"""
Creates all the components required for the jacobian update function
for an n by m shaped grid
"""
LaddU = adjacency_matrix(n,m)
A = create_differences_matrix(n,m)
invD = np.zeros((n*m, n*m))
np.fill_diagonal(invD, 1/4)
return A, LaddU, invD
def calc_RJ(rows, cols):
"""
Calculates the jacobian update matrix Rj for an n by m shaped grid
"""
n = int(rows*cols)
M = np.zeros((n,n))
for r in range(rows):
for c in range(cols):
i = r*cols + c
# Two inner diagonals
if c > 0: M[i-1,i] = M[i,i-1] = 0.25
# Two outer diagonals
if r > 0: M[i-cols,i] = M[i,i-cols] = 0.25
return M
def jacobi_update(v, f, nsteps=1, max_err=1e-3):
"""
Uses a jacobian update matrix to solve nabla(v) = f
"""
f_inner = f[1:-1, 1:-1].flatten()
n = v.shape[0]
m = v.shape[1]
A, LaddU, invD = create_A(n-2, m-2)
Rj = calc_RJ(n-2,m-2)
update=True
step = 0
while update:
v_old = v.copy()
step += 1
vt = v_old[1:-1, 1:-1].flatten()
vt = np.dot(Rj, vt) + np.dot(invD, f_inner)
v[1:-1, 1:-1] = vt.reshape((n-2),(m-2))
err = v - v_old
if step == nsteps or np.abs(err).max()<max_err:
update=False
return v, (step, np.abs(err).max())
def MGV(f, v):
"""
Solves for nabla(v) = f using a multigrid method
"""
# global A, r
n = v.shape[0]
m = v.shape[1]
# If on the smallest grid size, compute the exact solution
if n <= 6 or m <=6:
v, info = jacobi_update(v, f, nsteps=1000)
return v
else:
# smoothing
v, info = jacobi_update(v, f, nsteps=10, max_err=1e-1)
A = create_A(n, m)[0]
# calculate residual
r = np.dot(A, v.flatten()) - f.flatten()
r = r.reshape(n,m)
# downsample resitdual error
r = restrict(r)
zero_array = np.zeros(r.shape)
# interploate the correction computed on a corser grid
d = interpolate_array(MGV(r, zero_array))
# Add prolongated corser grid solution onto the finer grid
v = v - d
v, info = jacobi_update(v, f, nsteps=10, max_err=1e-6)
return v
sigma = 0
# Setting up the grid
k = 6
n = 2**k+2
m = 2**(k)+2
hx = 1/n
hy = 1/m
L = 1
H = 1
x = np.linspace(0, L, n)
y = np.linspace(0, H, m)
XX, YY = np.meshgrid(x, y)
# Setting up the initial conditions
f = np.ones((n,m))
v = np.zeros((n,m))
# How many V cyles to perform
err = 1
n_cycles = 10
loop = True
cycle = 0
# Perform V cycles until converged or reached the maximum
# number of cycles
while loop:
cycle += 1
v_new = MGV(f, v)
if np.abs(v - v_new).max() < err:
loop = False
if cycle == n_cycles:
loop = False
v = v_new
print("Number of cycles " + str(cycle))
plt.contourf(v)
I realize that I'm not answering your question directly, but I do note that you have quite a few loops that will contribute some overhead cost. When optimizing code, I have found the following thread useful - particularly the line profiler thread. This way you can focus in on "high time cost" lines and then start to ask more specific questions regarding opportunities to optimize.
How do I get time of a Python program's execution?
I am trying to plot the relationship between period and amplitude for an undamped and undriven pendulum for when small angle approximation breaks down, however, my code did not do what I expected...
I think I should be expecting a strictly increasing graph as shown in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34zcw_nNFGU
Here is my code, I used zero crossing method to calculate period:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from scipy.integrate import solve_ivp
from itertools import chain
# Second order differential equation to be solved:
# d^2 theta/dt^2 = - (g/l)*sin(theta) - q* (d theta/dt) + F*sin(omega*t)
# set g = l and omega = 2/3 rad per second
# Let y[0] = theta, y[1] = d(theta)/dt
def derivatives(t,y,q,F):
return [y[1], -np.sin(y[0])-q*y[1]+F*np.sin((2/3)*t)]
t = np.linspace(0.0, 100, 10000)
#initial conditions:theta0, omega0
theta0 = np.linspace(0.0,np.pi,100)
q = 0.0 #alpha / (mass*g), resistive term
F = 0.0 #G*np.sin(2*t/3)
value = []
amp = []
period = []
for i in range (len(theta0)):
sol = solve_ivp(derivatives, (0.0,100.0), (theta0[i], 0.0), method = 'RK45', t_eval = t,args = (q,F))
velocity = sol.y[1]
time = sol.t
zero_cross = 0
for k in range (len(velocity)-1):
if (velocity[k+1]*velocity[k]) < 0:
zero_cross += 1
value.append(k)
else:
zero_cross += 0
if zero_cross != 0:
amp.append(theta0[i])
# period calculated using the time evolved between the first and last zero-crossing detected
period.append((2*(time[value[zero_cross - 1]] - time[value[0]])) / (zero_cross -1))
plt.plot(amp,period)
plt.title('Period of oscillation of an undamped, undriven pendulum \nwith varying initial angular displacemnet')
plt.xlabel('Initial Displacement')
plt.ylabel('Period/s')
plt.show()
enter image description here
You can use the event mechanism of solve_ivp for such tasks, it is designed for such "simple" situations
def halfperiod(t,y): return y[1]
halfperiod.terminal=True # stop when root found
halfperiod.direction=1 # find sign changes from negative to positive
for i in range (1,len(theta0)): # amp==0 gives no useful result
sol = solve_ivp(derivatives, (0.0,100.0), (theta0[i], 0.0), method = 'RK45', events =(halfperiod,) )
if sol.success and len(sol.t_events[-1])>0:
period.append(2*sol.t_events[-1][0]) # the full period is twice the event time
amp.append(theta0[i])
This results in the plot
I am trying to implement a finite difference approximation to solve the Heat Equation, u_t = k * u_{xx}, in Python using NumPy.
Here is a copy of the code I am running:
## This program is to implement a Finite Difference method approximation
## to solve the Heat Equation, u_t = k * u_xx,
## in 1D w/out sources & on a finite interval 0 < x < L. The PDE
## is subject to B.C: u(0,t) = u(L,t) = 0,
## and the I.C: u(x,0) = f(x).
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# parameters
L = 1 # legnth of the rod
T = 10 # terminal time
N = 10
M = 100
s = 0.25
# uniform mesh
x_init = 0
x_end = L
dx = float(x_end - x_init) / N
x = np.arange(x_init, x_end, dx)
x[0] = x_init
# time discretization
t_init = 0
t_end = T
dt = float(t_end - t_init) / M
t = np.arange(t_init, t_end, dt)
t[0] = t_init
# Boundary Conditions
for m in xrange(0, M):
t[m] = m * dt
# Initial Conditions
for j in xrange(0, N):
x[j] = j * dx
# definition of solution u(x,t) to u_t = k * u_xx
u = np.zeros((N, M+1)) # array to store values of the solution
# Finite Difference Scheme:
u[:,0] = x**2 #initial condition
for m in xrange(0, M):
for j in xrange(1, N-1):
if j == 1:
u[j-1,m] = 0 # Boundary condition
elif j == N-1:
u[j+1,m] = 0
else:
u[j,m+1] = u[j,m] + s * ( u[j+1,m] -
2 * u[j,m] + u[j-1,m] )
print u, #t, x
plt.plot(u, t)
#plt.show()
I think my code is working properly and it is producing an output. I want to plot the output of the solution u versus t (my time vector). If I can plot the graph then I am able to check if my numerical approximation agrees with the expected phenomena for the Heat Equation. However, I am getting the error that "x and y must have same first dimension". How can I correct this issue?
An additional question: Am I better off attempting to make an animation with matplotlib.animation instead of using matplotlib.plyplot ???
Thanks so much for any and all help! It is very greatly appreciated!
Okay so I had a "brain dump" and tried plotting u vs. t sort of forgetting that u, being the solution to the Heat Equation (u_t = k * u_{xx}), is defined as u(x,t) so it has values for time. I made the following correction to my code:
print u #t, x
plt.plot(u)
plt.show()
And now my programming is finally displaying an image. And here it is:
It is absolutely beautiful, isn't it?
i'm currently incredibly stuck on what isn't working in my code and have been staring at it for hours. I have created some functions to approximate the solution to the laplace equation adaptively using the finite element method then estimate it's error using the dual weighted residual. The error function should give a vector of errors (one error for each element), i then choose the biggest errors, add more elements around them, solve again and then recheck the error; however i have no idea why my error estimate isn't changing!
My first 4 functions are correct but i will include them incase someone wants to try the code:
def Poisson_Stiffness(x0):
"""Finds the Poisson equation stiffness matrix with any non uniform mesh x0"""
x0 = np.array(x0)
N = len(x0) - 1 # The amount of elements; x0, x1, ..., xN
h = x0[1:] - x0[:-1]
a = np.zeros(N+1)
a[0] = 1 #BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
a[1:-1] = 1/h[1:] + 1/h[:-1]
a[-1] = 1/h[-1]
a[N] = 1 #BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
b = -1/h
b[0] = 0 #BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
c = -1/h
c[N-1] = 0 #BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: DIRICHLET
data = [a.tolist(), b.tolist(), c.tolist()]
Positions = [0, 1, -1]
Stiffness_Matrix = diags(data, Positions, (N+1,N+1))
return Stiffness_Matrix
def NodalQuadrature(x0):
"""Finds the Nodal Quadrature Approximation of sin(pi x)"""
x0 = np.array(x0)
h = x0[1:] - x0[:-1]
N = len(x0) - 1
approx = np.zeros(len(x0))
approx[0] = 0 #BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
for i in range(1,N):
approx[i] = math.sin(math.pi*x0[i])
approx[i] = (approx[i]*h[i-1] + approx[i]*h[i])/2
approx[N] = 0 #BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
return approx
def Solver(x0):
Stiff_Matrix = Poisson_Stiffness(x0)
NodalApproximation = NodalQuadrature(x0)
NodalApproximation[0] = 0
U = scipy.sparse.linalg.spsolve(Stiff_Matrix, NodalApproximation)
return U
def Dualsolution(rich_mesh,qoi_rich_node): #BOUNDARY CONDITIONS?
"""Find Z from stiffness matrix Z = K^-1 Q over richer mesh"""
K = Poisson_Stiffness(rich_mesh)
Q = np.zeros(len(rich_mesh))
Q[qoi_rich_node] = 1.0
Z = scipy.sparse.linalg.spsolve(K,Q)
return Z
My error indicator function takes in an approximation Uh, with the mesh it is solved over, and finds eta = (f - Bu)z.
def Error_Indicators(Uh,U_mesh,Z,Z_mesh,f):
"""Take in U, Interpolate to same mesh as Z then solve for eta vector"""
u_inter = interp1d(U_mesh,Uh) #Interpolation of old mesh
U2 = u_inter(Z_mesh) #New function u for the new mesh to use in
Bz = Poisson_Stiffness(Z_mesh)
Bz = Bz.tocsr()
eta = np.empty(len(Z_mesh))
for i in range(len(Z_mesh)):
for j in range(len(Z_mesh)):
eta[i] += (f[i] - Bz[i,j]*U2[j])
for i in range(len(Z)):
eta[i] = eta[i]*Z[i]
return eta
My next function seems to adapt the mesh very well to the given error indicator! Just no idea why the indicator seems to stay the same regardless?
def Mesh_Refinement(base_mesh,tolerance,refinement,z_mesh,QOI_z_mesh):
"""Solve for U on a normal mesh, Take in Z, Find error indicators, adapt. OUTPUT NEW MESH"""
New_mesh = base_mesh
Z = Dualsolution(z_mesh,QOI_z_mesh) #Solve dual solution only once
f = np.empty(len(z_mesh))
for i in range(len(z_mesh)):
f[i] = math.sin(math.pi*z_mesh[i])
U = Solver(New_mesh)
eta = Error_Indicators(U,base_mesh,Z,z_mesh,f)
while max(abs(k) for k in eta) > tolerance:
orderedeta = np.sort(eta) #Sort error indicators LENGTH 40
biggest = np.flipud(orderedeta[int((1-refinement)*len(eta)):len(eta)])
position = np.empty(len(biggest))
ratio = float(len(New_mesh))/float(len(z_mesh))
for i in range(len(biggest)):
position[i] = eta.tolist().index(biggest[i])*ratio #GIVES WHAT NUMBER NODE TO REFINE
refine = np.zeros(len(position))
for i in range(len(position)):
refine[i] = math.floor(position[i])+0.5 #AT WHAT NODE TO PUT NEW ELEMENT 5.5 ETC
refine = np.flipud(sorted(set(refine)))
for i in range(len(refine)):
New_mesh = np.insert(New_mesh,refine[i]+0.5,(New_mesh[refine[i]+0.5]+New_mesh[refine[i]-0.5])/2)
U = Solver(New_mesh)
eta = Error_Indicators(U,New_mesh,Z,z_mesh,f)
print eta
An example input for this would be:
Mesh_Refinement(np.linspace(0,1,3),0.1,0.2,np.linspace(0,1,60),20)
I understand there is alot of code here but i am at a loss, i have no idea where to turn!
Please consider this piece of code from def Error_Indicators:
eta = np.empty(len(Z_mesh))
for i in range(len(Z_mesh)):
for j in range(len(Z_mesh)):
eta[i] = (f[i] - Bz[i,j]*U2[j])
Here you override eta[i] each j iteration, so the inner cycle proves useless and you can go directly to the last possible j. Did you mean to find a sum of the (f[i] - Bz[i,j]*U2[j]) series?
eta = np.empty(len(Z_mesh))
for i in range(len(Z_mesh)):
for j in range(len(Z_mesh)):
eta[i] += (f[i] - Bz[i,j]*U2[j])