How can I bind the python built in functions? - python

I don't even know if this is possible.
I want to do something like:
>>> foo = float
>>> x = foo('2')
>>> x
2
But when I try it I get a type object in foo:
>>> foo = float
>>> foo
<type 'int'>
I want to save a structure like object that holds the correct function to call when converting values to be read from a file.
Thanks in advance for any help.

It's certainly possible; the identifiers for builtins are no different from any other identifiers, and there's no reason you can't bind your own identifiers to the same objects.
If you're not getting the expected results, check and make sure you haven't accidentally rebound the identifiers to other values.

You can just bind them. But that is not an advisable thing to do because your overriding the default behavior with something else and functions which you relying on the default behavior would unexpectedly break. So do not do that!
>>> foo = float
>>> bar = int
>>> foo('2')
2.0
>>> bar('2')
2
>>> type(foo)
<type 'type'>
>>> type(bar)
<type 'type'>
>>>

Related

Python string to float conversion

Can someone explain why the x below can act as a function float()? Basically I dont understand what means? is this a internal function or implicit object ?
>>> x=type(0.0)
>>> x
<type 'float'>
>>> x('9.823')
9.823
It's exactly the same as writing float('9.823'). In fact, you can easily see that as follows:
>>> type(0.0) is float
True
>>>
And you can use them in exactly the same way:
>>> float('9.823')
9.823
>>> type(0.0)('9.823')
9.823
>>>
It's just invokes the constructor for the float type.
You're setting the variable x to the type float. The command type() returns the type of whatever is inside the brackets. In your case, you provided the type command with a float and setting that return of float to your variable x.
It can act as the function float because you are effectively making x = float.
As an example, you could also, for instance do this:
x = type(1) #int
print x(1.1111) # will print 1

Pythonic way of converting integers to string

>>> foo = 1
>>> type(foo)
<type 'int'>
>>> type(str(foo))
<type 'str'>
>>> type(`foo`)
<type 'str'>
Which is the more Pythonic way of converting integers to strings? I have always been using the first method but I now find the second method more readable. Is there a practical difference?
String conversions using backticks are a shorthand notation for calling repr() on a value. For integers, the resulting output of str() and repr() happens to be the same, but it is not the same operation:
>>> example = 'bar'
>>> str(example)
'bar'
>>> repr(example)
"'bar'"
>>> `example`
"'bar'"
The backticks syntax was removed from Python 3; I wouldn't use it, as an explicit str() or repr() call is far clearer in its intent.
Note that you have more options to convert integers to strings; you can use str.format() or old style string formatting operations to interpolate an integer into a larger string:
>>> print 'Hello world! The answer is, as always, {}'.format(42)
Hello world! The answer is, as always, 42
which is much more powerful than using string concatenation.

Check whether the type of a variable is a specific type in Python

I want to check whether the type of a variable is a specific kind in Python. For example- I want to check if var x is an int or not.
>>x=10
>>type(x)
<type 'int'>
But how can I compare their types. I tried this, but it doesn't seem to work.
if type(10)== "<type 'int'>":
print 'yes'
How can I do this ?
Use the isinstance() function to test for a specific type:
isinstance(x, int)
isinstance() takes either a single type, or a tuple of types to test against:
isinstance(x, (float, complex, int))
would test for a series of different numeric types for example.
Your example could be written as:
if type(10) is int: # "==" instead of "is" would also work.
print 'yes'
But note that it might not exactly do what you want, for example, if you wrote 10L or a number greater than sys.maxint instead of just 10, this would not print yes, because long (which would be the type of such a number) is not int.
Another way is, as Martijn already suggested, to use the isinstance() builtin function as follows:
if isinstance(type(10), int):
print 'yes'
insinstance(instance, Type) returns True not only if type(instance) is Type but also if instance's type is derived from Type. So, since bool is a subclass of int this would also work for True and False.
But generally it is better not to check for specific types, but for for the features, you need. That is, if your code can't handle the type, it will automatically throw an exception when trying to perform an unsupported operation on the type.
If you, however, need to handle e.g. integers and floating-point numbers differently, you might want to check for isinstance(var, numbers.Integral) (needs import numbers) which evalutes to True if var is of type int, long, bool or any user-defined type which is derived from this class. See the Python documenation on the standard type hierarchy and [numbers module]
You can use the following ways:
>>> isinstance('ss', str)
True
>>> type('ss')
<class 'str'>
>>> type('ss') == str
True
>>>
int - > Integer
float -> Floating Point Value
list -> List
tuple -> Tuple
dict -> Dictionary
For classes it is a little different:
Old type classes:
>>> # We want to check if cls is a class
>>> class A:
pass
>>> type(A)
<type 'classobj'>
>>> type(A) == type(cls) # This should tell us
New type classes:
>>> # We want to check if cls is a class
>>> class B(object):
pass
>>> type(B)
<type 'type'>
>>> type(cls) == type(B) # This should tell us
>>> #OR
>>> type(cls) == type # This should tell us

How to check if a variable's type is primitive?

I don't know how to check if a variable is primitive. In Java it's like this:
if var.isPrimitive():
Since there are no primitive types in Python, you yourself must define what you consider primitive:
primitive = (int, str, bool, ...)
def is_primitive(thing):
return isinstance(thing, primitive)
But then, do you consider this primitive, too:
class MyStr(str):
...
?
If not, you could do this:
def is_primitive(thing):
return type(thing) in primitive
As every one says, there is no primitive types in python. But I believe, this is what you want.
def isPrimitive(obj):
return not hasattr(obj, '__dict__')
isPrimitive(1) => True
isPrimitive("sample") => True
isPrimitive(213.1311) => True
isPrimitive({}) => True
isPrimitive([]) => True
isPrimitive(()) => True
class P:
pass
isPrimitive(P) => False
isPrimitive(P()) => False
def func():
pass
isPrimitive(func) => False
In Python, everything is an object; even ints and bools. So if by 'primitive' you mean "not an object" (as I think the word is used in Java), then there are no such types in Python.
If you want to know if a given value (remember, in Python variables do not have type, only values do) is an int, float, bool or whatever type you think of as 'primitive', then you can do:
if type(myval) in (int, float, bool, str ...):
# Sneaky stuff
(Need I mention that types are also objects, with a type of their own?)
If you also need to account for types that subclass the built-in types, check out the built-in isinstance() function.
Python gurus try to write code that makes minimal assumptions about what types will be sent in. Allowing this is one of the strengths of the language: it often allows code to work in unexpected ways. So you may want to avoid writing code that makes an arbitrary distinction between types.
It's not easy to say definitely what to consider 'primitive' in Python. But you can make a list and check all you want:
is_primitive = isinstance(myvar, (int, float, bool)) # extend the list to taste
For Python 2.7, you may want to take a look at types module, that lists all python built-in types.
https://docs.python.org/2.7/library/types.html
It seems that Python 3 does not provide the same 'base' type values as 2.7 did.
isinstance(obj, (str, numbers.Number) should be close enough:
If it helps,
In [1]: type(1)
Out[1]: <type 'int'>
In [2]: type('a')
Out[2]: <type 'str'>
In [3]: (type(5.4)
Out[3]: <type 'float'>
In [5]: type(object)
Out[5]: <type 'type'>
In [8]: type(int)
Out[8]: <type 'type'>

How to determine a Python variable's type?

How do I see the type of a variable? (e.g. unsigned 32 bit)
Use the type() builtin function:
>>> i = 123
>>> type(i)
<type 'int'>
>>> type(i) is int
True
>>> i = 123.456
>>> type(i)
<type 'float'>
>>> type(i) is float
True
To check if a variable is of a given type, use isinstance:
>>> i = 123
>>> isinstance(i, int)
True
>>> isinstance(i, (float, str, set, dict))
False
Note that Python doesn't have the same types as C/C++, which appears to be your question.
You may be looking for the type() built-in function.
See the examples below, but there's no "unsigned" type in Python just like Java.
Positive integer:
>>> v = 10
>>> type(v)
<type 'int'>
Large positive integer:
>>> v = 100000000000000
>>> type(v)
<type 'long'>
Negative integer:
>>> v = -10
>>> type(v)
<type 'int'>
Literal sequence of characters:
>>> v = 'hi'
>>> type(v)
<type 'str'>
Floating point integer:
>>> v = 3.14159
>>> type(v)
<type 'float'>
It is so simple. You do it like this.
print(type(variable_name))
How to determine the variable type in Python?
So if you have a variable, for example:
one = 1
You want to know its type?
There are right ways and wrong ways to do just about everything in Python. Here's the right way:
Use type
>>> type(one)
<type 'int'>
You can use the __name__ attribute to get the name of the object. (This is one of the few special attributes that you need to use the __dunder__ name to get to - there's not even a method for it in the inspect module.)
>>> type(one).__name__
'int'
Don't use __class__
In Python, names that start with underscores are semantically not a part of the public API, and it's a best practice for users to avoid using them. (Except when absolutely necessary.)
Since type gives us the class of the object, we should avoid getting this directly. :
>>> one.__class__
This is usually the first idea people have when accessing the type of an object in a method - they're already looking for attributes, so type seems weird. For example:
class Foo(object):
def foo(self):
self.__class__
Don't. Instead, do type(self):
class Foo(object):
def foo(self):
type(self)
Implementation details of ints and floats
How do I see the type of a variable whether it is unsigned 32 bit, signed 16 bit, etc.?
In Python, these specifics are implementation details. So, in general, we don't usually worry about this in Python. However, to sate your curiosity...
In Python 2, int is usually a signed integer equal to the implementation's word width (limited by the system). It's usually implemented as a long in C. When integers get bigger than this, we usually convert them to Python longs (with unlimited precision, not to be confused with C longs).
For example, in a 32 bit Python 2, we can deduce that int is a signed 32 bit integer:
>>> import sys
>>> format(sys.maxint, '032b')
'01111111111111111111111111111111'
>>> format(-sys.maxint - 1, '032b') # minimum value, see docs.
'-10000000000000000000000000000000'
In Python 3, the old int goes away, and we just use (Python's) long as int, which has unlimited precision.
We can also get some information about Python's floats, which are usually implemented as a double in C:
>>> sys.float_info
sys.floatinfo(max=1.7976931348623157e+308, max_exp=1024, max_10_exp=308,
min=2.2250738585072014e-308, min_exp=-1021, min_10_exp=-307, dig=15,
mant_dig=53, epsilon=2.2204460492503131e-16, radix=2, rounds=1)
Conclusion
Don't use __class__, a semantically nonpublic API, to get the type of a variable. Use type instead.
And don't worry too much about the implementation details of Python. I've not had to deal with issues around this myself. You probably won't either, and if you really do, you should know enough not to be looking to this answer for what to do.
print type(variable_name)
I also highly recommend the IPython interactive interpreter when dealing with questions like this. It lets you type variable_name? and will return a whole list of information about the object including the type and the doc string for the type.
e.g.
In [9]: var = 123
In [10]: var?
Type: int
Base Class: <type 'int'>
String Form: 123
Namespace: Interactive
Docstring:
int(x[, base]) -> integer
Convert a string or number to an integer, if possible. A floating point argument will be truncated towards zero (this does not include a string
representation of a floating point number!) When converting a string, use the optional base. It is an error to supply a base when converting a
non-string. If the argument is outside the integer range a long object
will be returned instead.
a = "cool"
type(a)
//result 'str'
<class 'str'>
or
do
`dir(a)`
to see the list of inbuilt methods you can have on the variable.
One more way using __class__:
>>> a = [1, 2, 3, 4]
>>> a.__class__
<type 'list'>
>>> b = {'key1': 'val1'}
>>> b.__class__
<type 'dict'>
>>> c = 12
>>> c.__class__
<type 'int'>
Examples of simple type checking in Python:
assert type(variable_name) == int
assert type(variable_name) == bool
assert type(variable_name) == list
It may be little irrelevant. but you can check types of an object with isinstance(object, type) as mentioned here.
The question is somewhat ambiguous -- I'm not sure what you mean by "view". If you are trying to query the type of a native Python object, #atzz's answer will steer you in the right direction.
However, if you are trying to generate Python objects that have the semantics of primitive C-types, (such as uint32_t, int16_t), use the struct module. You can determine the number of bits in a given C-type primitive thusly:
>>> struct.calcsize('c') # char
1
>>> struct.calcsize('h') # short
2
>>> struct.calcsize('i') # int
4
>>> struct.calcsize('l') # long
4
This is also reflected in the array module, which can make arrays of these lower-level types:
>>> array.array('c').itemsize # char
1
The maximum integer supported (Python 2's int) is given by sys.maxint.
>>> import sys, math
>>> math.ceil(math.log(sys.maxint, 2)) + 1 # Signedness
32.0
There is also sys.getsizeof, which returns the actual size of the Python object in residual memory:
>>> a = 5
>>> sys.getsizeof(a) # Residual memory.
12
For float data and precision data, use sys.float_info:
>>> sys.float_info
sys.floatinfo(max=1.7976931348623157e+308, max_exp=1024, max_10_exp=308, min=2.2250738585072014e-308, min_exp=-1021, min_10_exp=-307, dig=15, mant_dig=53, epsilon=2.2204460492503131e-16, radix=2, rounds=1)
Do you mean in Python or using ctypes?
In the first case, you simply cannot - because Python does not have signed/unsigned, 16/32 bit integers.
In the second case, you can use type():
>>> import ctypes
>>> a = ctypes.c_uint() # unsigned int
>>> type(a)
<class 'ctypes.c_ulong'>
For more reference on ctypes, an its type, see the official documentation.
Python doesn't have such types as you describe. There are two types used to represent integral values: int, which corresponds to platform's int type in C, and long, which is an arbitrary precision integer (i.e. it grows as needed and doesn't have an upper limit). ints are silently converted to long if an expression produces result which cannot be stored in int.
Simple, for python 3.4 and above
print (type(variable_name))
Python 2.7 and above
print type(variable_name)
It really depends on what level you mean. In Python 2.x, there are two integer types, int (constrained to sys.maxint) and long (unlimited precision), for historical reasons. In Python code, this shouldn't make a bit of difference because the interpreter automatically converts to long when a number is too large. If you want to know about the actual data types used in the underlying interpreter, that's implementation dependent. (CPython's are located in Objects/intobject.c and Objects/longobject.c.) To find out about the systems types look at cdleary answer for using the struct module.
For python2.x, use
print type(variable_name)
For python3.x, use
print(type(variable_name))
You should use the type() function. Like so:
my_variable = 5
print(type(my_variable)) # Would print out <class 'int'>
This function will view the type of any variable, whether it's a list or a class. Check this website for more information: https://www.w3schools.com/python/ref_func_type.asp
Python is a dynamically typed language. A variable, initially created as a string, can be later reassigned to an integer or a float. And the interpreter won’t complain:
name = "AnyValue"
# Dynamically typed language lets you do this:
name = 21
name = None
name = Exception()
To check the type of a variable, you can use either type() or isinstance() built-in function. Let’s see them in action:
Python3 example:
variable = "hello_world"
print(type(variable) is str) # True
print(isinstance(variable, str)) # True
Let's compare both methods performances in python3
python3 -m timeit -s "variable = 'hello_world'" "type(variable) is int"
5000000 loops, best of 5: 54.5 nsec per loop
python3 -m timeit -s "variable = 'hello_world'" "isinstance(variable, str)"
10000000 loops, best of 5: 39.2 nsec per loop
type is 40% slower approximately (54.5/39.2 = 1.390).
We could use type(variable) == str instead. It would work, but it’s a bad idea:
== should be used when you want to check the value of a variable. We would use it to see if the value of the variable is equal to "hello_world". But when we want to check if the variable is a string, is the operator is more appropriate. For a more detailed explanation of when to use one or the other, check this article.
== is slower: python3 -m timeit -s "variable = 'hello_world'" "type(variable) == str" 5000000 loops, best of 5: 64.4 nsec per loop
Difference between isinstance and type
Speed is not the only difference between these two functions. There is actually an important distinction between how they work:
type only returns the type of an object (it's class). We can use it to check if the variable is of type str.
isinstance checks if a given object (first parameter) is:
an instance of a class specified as a second parameter. For example, is variable an instance of the str class?
or an instance of a subclass of a class specified as a second parameter. In other words - is variable an instance of a subclass of str?
What does it mean in practice? Let’s say we want to have a custom class that acts as a list but has some additional methods. So we might subclass the list type and add custom functions inside:
class MyAwesomeList(list):
# Add additional functions here
pass
But now the type and isinstance return different results if we compare this new class to a list!
my_list = MyAwesomeList()
print(type(my_list) is list) # False
print(isinstance(my_list, list)) # True
We get different results because isinstance checks if my_list is an instance of the list (it’s not) or a subclass of the list (it is because MyAwesomeList is a subclass of the list). If you forget about this difference, it can lead to some subtle bugs in your code.
Conclusions
isinstance is usually the preferred way to compare types. It’s not only faster but also considers inheritance, which is often the desired behavior. In Python, you usually want to check if a given object behaves like a string or a list, not necessarily if it’s exactly a string. So instead of checking for string and all its custom subclasses, you can just use isinstance.
On the other hand, when you want to explicitly check that a given variable is of a specific type (and not its subclass) - use type. And when you use it, use it like this: type(var) is some_type not like this: type(var) == some_type.
I saw this one when I was new to Python (I still am):
x = …
print(type(x))```
There's no 32bit and 64bit and 16bit, python is simple, you don't have to worry about it. See how to check the type:
integer = 1
print(type(integer)) # Result: <class 'int'>, and if it's a string then class will be str and so on.
# Checking the type
float_class = 1.3
print(isinstance(float_class, float)) # True
But if you really have to, you can use Ctypes library which has types like unsigned integer.
Ctypes types documentation
You can use it like this:
from ctypes import *
uint = c_uint(1) # Unsigned integer
print(uint) # Output: c_uint(1)
# To actually get the value, you have to call .value
print(uint.value)
# Change value
uint.value = 2
print(uint.value) # 2
There are many data types in python like:
Text Type: str
Numeric Types: int, float, complex
Sequence Types: list, tuple, range
Mapping Type: dict
Set Types: set, frozenset
Boolean Type: bool
Binary Types: bytes, bytearray, memoryview
None Type: NoneType
Here I have written a code having a list containing all type of data types example and printing their type
L = [
"Hello World",
20,
20.5,
1j,
["apple", "banana", "cherry"],
("apple", "banana", "cherry"),
range(6),
{"name" : "John", "age" : 36},
{"apple", "banana", "cherry"},
frozenset({"apple", "banana", "cherry"}),
True,
b"Hello",
bytearray(5),
memoryview(bytes(5)),
None
]
for _ in range(len(L)):
print(type(L[_]))
OUTPUT:
<class 'str'>
<class 'int'>
<class 'float'>
<class 'complex'>
<class 'list'>
<class 'tuple'>
<class 'range'>
<class 'dict'>
<class 'set'>
<class 'frozenset'>
<class 'bool'>
<class 'bytes'>
<class 'bytearray'>
<class 'memoryview'>
<class 'NoneType'>
Just do not do it. Asking for something's type is wrong in itself. Instead use polymorphism. Find or if necessary define by yourself the method that does what you want for any possible type of input and just call it without asking about anything. If you need to work with built-in types or types defined by a third-party library, you can always inherit from them and use your own derivatives instead. Or you can wrap them inside your own class. This is the object-oriented way to resolve such problems.
If you insist on checking exact type and placing some dirty ifs here and there, you can use __class__ property or type function to do it, but soon you will find yourself updating all these ifs with additional cases every two or three commits. Doing it the OO way prevents that and lets you only define a new class for a new type of input instead.

Categories

Resources