When should I use __init__ and when __call__ method ?
I am confused about whether should I use the first or the second.
At the moment I can use them both, but I don't know which is more appropriate.
These two are completely different.
__init__() is the constructor, it is run on new instances of the object.
__call__() is run when you try to call an instance of an object as if it were a function.
E.g: Say we have a class, Test:
a = Test() #This will call Test.__init__() (among other things)
a() #This will call Test.__call__()
A quick test shows the difference between them
class Foo(object):
def __init__(self):
print "init"
def __call__(self):
print "call"
f = Foo() # prints "init"
f() # prints "call"
In no way are these interchangeable
Most likely, you want to use __init__. This is the method used to initialize a new instance of your class, which you make by calling the class. __call__ is in case you want to make your instances callable. That's not something frequently done, though it can be useful. This example should illustrate:
>>> class C(object):
... def __init__(self):
... print 'init'
... def __call__(self):
... print 'call'
...
>>> c = C()
init
>>> c()
call
>>>
A simple code snippet will elaborate this better.
>>> class Math:
... def __init__(self):
... self.x,self.y=20,30
... def __call__(self):
... return self.x+self.y
...
>>> m=Math()
>>> m()
50
Related
How can I get the class that defined a method in Python?
I'd want the following example to print "__main__.FooClass":
class FooClass:
def foo_method(self):
print "foo"
class BarClass(FooClass):
pass
bar = BarClass()
print get_class_that_defined_method(bar.foo_method)
import inspect
def get_class_that_defined_method(meth):
for cls in inspect.getmro(meth.im_class):
if meth.__name__ in cls.__dict__:
return cls
return None
I don't know why no one has ever brought this up or why the top answer has 50 upvotes when it is slow as hell, but you can also do the following:
def get_class_that_defined_method(meth):
return meth.im_class.__name__
For python 3 I believe this changed and you'll need to look into .__qualname__.
In Python 3, if you need the actual class object you can do:
import sys
f = Foo.my_function
vars(sys.modules[f.__module__])[f.__qualname__.split('.')[0]] # Gets Foo object
If the function could belong to a nested class you would need to iterate as follows:
f = Foo.Bar.my_function
vals = vars(sys.modules[f.__module__])
for attr in f.__qualname__.split('.')[:-1]:
vals = vals[attr]
# vals is now the class Foo.Bar
Thanks Sr2222 for pointing out I was missing the point...
Here's the corrected approach which is just like Alex's but does not require to import anything. I don't think it's an improvement though, unless there's a huge hierarchy of inherited classes as this approach stops as soon as the defining class is found, instead of returning the whole inheritance as getmro does. As said, this is a very unlikely scenario.
def get_class_that_defined_method(method):
method_name = method.__name__
if method.__self__:
classes = [method.__self__.__class__]
else:
#unbound method
classes = [method.im_class]
while classes:
c = classes.pop()
if method_name in c.__dict__:
return c
else:
classes = list(c.__bases__) + classes
return None
And the Example:
>>> class A(object):
... def test(self): pass
>>> class B(A): pass
>>> class C(B): pass
>>> class D(A):
... def test(self): print 1
>>> class E(D,C): pass
>>> get_class_that_defined_method(A().test)
<class '__main__.A'>
>>> get_class_that_defined_method(A.test)
<class '__main__.A'>
>>> get_class_that_defined_method(B.test)
<class '__main__.A'>
>>> get_class_that_defined_method(C.test)
<class '__main__.A'>
>>> get_class_that_defined_method(D.test)
<class '__main__.D'>
>>> get_class_that_defined_method(E().test)
<class '__main__.D'>
>>> get_class_that_defined_method(E.test)
<class '__main__.D'>
>>> E().test()
1
Alex solution returns the same results. As long as Alex approach can be used, I would use it instead of this one.
Python 3
Solved it in a very simple way:
str(bar.foo_method).split(" ", 3)[-2]
This gives
'FooClass.foo_method'
Split on the dot to get the class and the function name separately
I found __qualname__ is useful in Python3.
I test it like that:
class Cls(object):
def func(self):
print('1')
c = Cls()
print(c.func.__qualname__)
# output is: 'Cls.func'
def single_func():
print(2)
print(single_func.__module__)
# output: '__main__'
print(single_func.__qualname__)
# output: 'single_func'
After my test, I found another answer here.
I started doing something somewhat similar, basically the idea was checking whenever a method in a base class had been implemented or not in a sub class. Turned out the way I originally did it I could not detect when an intermediate class was actually implementing the method.
My workaround for it was quite simple actually; setting a method attribute and testing its presence later. Here's an simplification of the whole thing:
class A():
def method(self):
pass
method._orig = None # This attribute will be gone once the method is implemented
def run_method(self, *args, **kwargs):
if hasattr(self.method, '_orig'):
raise Exception('method not implemented')
self.method(*args, **kwargs)
class B(A):
pass
class C(B):
def method(self):
pass
class D(C):
pass
B().run_method() # ==> Raises Exception: method not implemented
C().run_method() # OK
D().run_method() # OK
UPDATE: Actually call method() from run_method() (isn't that the spirit?) and have it pass all arguments unmodified to the method.
P.S.: This answer does not directly answer the question. IMHO there are two reasons one would want to know which class defined a method; first is to point fingers at a class in debug code (such as in exception handling), and the second is to determine if the method has been re-implemented (where method is a stub meant to be implemented by the programmer). This answer solves that second case in a different way.
if you get this error:
'function' object has no attribute 'im_class'
try this:
import inspect
def get_class_that_defined_method(meth):
class_func_defided = meth.__globals__[meth.__qualname__.split('.')[0]]
#full_func_name = "%s.%s.%s"%(class_func_defided.__module__,class_func_defided.__name__,meth.__name__)
if inspect.isfunction(class_func_defided):
print("%s is not part of a class."%meth.__name__)
return None
return class_func_defided
sample test:
class ExampleClass:
#staticmethod
def ex_static_method():
print("hello from static method")
def ex_instance_method(self):
print("hello from instance method")
def ex_funct(self):
print("hello from simple function")
if __name__ == "__main__":
static_method_class = get_class_that_defined_method(ExampleClass.ex_static_method)
static_method_class.ex_static_method()
instance_method_class = get_class_that_defined_method(ExampleClass.ex_instance_method)
instance_method_class().ex_instance_method()
function_class = get_class_that_defined_method(ex_funct)
I know how fierce the SO community is so I'll try my best to keep the question minimal, complete and verifiable.
What I simply want to know is can monkey patching be used to replace the definition of an existing function?
for example:
class A():
def foo():
print '2'
def foo():
print '5'
A.foo = foo
This way doesn't seem to work also as to why I don't just add a new function instead of replacing an existing one, I call these functions in other classes and it is my understanding that monkey patching adds those functions at run-time and I need my python code to run on an Apache spark server which throws an error deeming the calls to that function unreferenced.
So please be nice and help me out or suggest a work around.
Thanks.
Edit: The goal of the code is to print 5 when A.foo is called.
Your only problem is that you aren't defining foo correctly in the first place. It needs to take an explicit argument for the instance calling it.
class A(object):
def __init__(self)
self.x = 2
def foo(self):
print(self.x)
def foo(this):
print(this.x + 3)
A.foo = foo
a = A()
a.foo() # outputs 5 in Python 2 and Python 3
In a very real sense, monkey patching is how classes are created in the first place. A class statement is almost just syntactic sugar for the following code:
def foo(self):
print(self.x)
A = type('A', (object,), {'foo': foo})
del foo
It's not too much of a simplification to image the definition of type being something like
def type(name, bases, d):
new_class = magic_function_to_make_a_class()
new_class.name = name
new_class.bases = bases
for k, v in d.items():
setattr(new_class, k, v)
return new_class
I hope I understand what you are trying to do here. This would work in Python 3:
class A():
def foo():
print('2')
def foo():
A.foo = lambda: print('5')
A.foo() # Print '2'
foo() # Assign the new method
A.foo() # Prints '5'
In Python 2 however there are several caveats.
print is not a method as it is in Python 3 (see here: Why doesn't print work in a lambda?)
You can't just call unbound messages (see here: In Python, can you call an instance method of class A, but pass in an instance of class B?)
So you have to do it like this:
from __future__ import print_function
class A():
def foo():
print('2')
def foo():
A.foo = lambda: print('5')
A.foo.__func__() # Print '2'
foo() # Assign the new method
A.foo.__func__() # Prints '5'
Edit:
After seeing your question in the comment I think you actually want something different. Which is this:
class A():
def foo(self):
print '2'
def foo(self):
print '5'
a = A()
a.foo() # Print '2'
A.foo = foo # Assign the new method
a.foo() # Prints '5'
This works just fine in Python 2.
The self is a reference to the current instance the method is bound to. It is not used when you just call something like print which access any properties or methods attached to that instance. But for a different case please have a look at the following example:
class A():
msg = "Some message"
def foo(self):
print self.msg
def bar(self):
self.msg = "Some other message"
a = A()
a.foo() # Print old msg
A.bar = bar # Assign the new method
a.bar() # Assigns new message
a.foo() # Prints new message
Also as chepner points out in a comment under his post:
The name self isn't special; it's just a convention. You could use
this if you really wanted to, and it doesn't need to be the same name
in both functions defined here. What is important is that the first
argument to a function used as an instance method will be a reference
to the calling object. a.foo() is almost exactly the same as A.foo(a)
How can I get the class that defined a method in Python?
I'd want the following example to print "__main__.FooClass":
class FooClass:
def foo_method(self):
print "foo"
class BarClass(FooClass):
pass
bar = BarClass()
print get_class_that_defined_method(bar.foo_method)
import inspect
def get_class_that_defined_method(meth):
for cls in inspect.getmro(meth.im_class):
if meth.__name__ in cls.__dict__:
return cls
return None
I don't know why no one has ever brought this up or why the top answer has 50 upvotes when it is slow as hell, but you can also do the following:
def get_class_that_defined_method(meth):
return meth.im_class.__name__
For python 3 I believe this changed and you'll need to look into .__qualname__.
In Python 3, if you need the actual class object you can do:
import sys
f = Foo.my_function
vars(sys.modules[f.__module__])[f.__qualname__.split('.')[0]] # Gets Foo object
If the function could belong to a nested class you would need to iterate as follows:
f = Foo.Bar.my_function
vals = vars(sys.modules[f.__module__])
for attr in f.__qualname__.split('.')[:-1]:
vals = vals[attr]
# vals is now the class Foo.Bar
Thanks Sr2222 for pointing out I was missing the point...
Here's the corrected approach which is just like Alex's but does not require to import anything. I don't think it's an improvement though, unless there's a huge hierarchy of inherited classes as this approach stops as soon as the defining class is found, instead of returning the whole inheritance as getmro does. As said, this is a very unlikely scenario.
def get_class_that_defined_method(method):
method_name = method.__name__
if method.__self__:
classes = [method.__self__.__class__]
else:
#unbound method
classes = [method.im_class]
while classes:
c = classes.pop()
if method_name in c.__dict__:
return c
else:
classes = list(c.__bases__) + classes
return None
And the Example:
>>> class A(object):
... def test(self): pass
>>> class B(A): pass
>>> class C(B): pass
>>> class D(A):
... def test(self): print 1
>>> class E(D,C): pass
>>> get_class_that_defined_method(A().test)
<class '__main__.A'>
>>> get_class_that_defined_method(A.test)
<class '__main__.A'>
>>> get_class_that_defined_method(B.test)
<class '__main__.A'>
>>> get_class_that_defined_method(C.test)
<class '__main__.A'>
>>> get_class_that_defined_method(D.test)
<class '__main__.D'>
>>> get_class_that_defined_method(E().test)
<class '__main__.D'>
>>> get_class_that_defined_method(E.test)
<class '__main__.D'>
>>> E().test()
1
Alex solution returns the same results. As long as Alex approach can be used, I would use it instead of this one.
Python 3
Solved it in a very simple way:
str(bar.foo_method).split(" ", 3)[-2]
This gives
'FooClass.foo_method'
Split on the dot to get the class and the function name separately
I found __qualname__ is useful in Python3.
I test it like that:
class Cls(object):
def func(self):
print('1')
c = Cls()
print(c.func.__qualname__)
# output is: 'Cls.func'
def single_func():
print(2)
print(single_func.__module__)
# output: '__main__'
print(single_func.__qualname__)
# output: 'single_func'
After my test, I found another answer here.
I started doing something somewhat similar, basically the idea was checking whenever a method in a base class had been implemented or not in a sub class. Turned out the way I originally did it I could not detect when an intermediate class was actually implementing the method.
My workaround for it was quite simple actually; setting a method attribute and testing its presence later. Here's an simplification of the whole thing:
class A():
def method(self):
pass
method._orig = None # This attribute will be gone once the method is implemented
def run_method(self, *args, **kwargs):
if hasattr(self.method, '_orig'):
raise Exception('method not implemented')
self.method(*args, **kwargs)
class B(A):
pass
class C(B):
def method(self):
pass
class D(C):
pass
B().run_method() # ==> Raises Exception: method not implemented
C().run_method() # OK
D().run_method() # OK
UPDATE: Actually call method() from run_method() (isn't that the spirit?) and have it pass all arguments unmodified to the method.
P.S.: This answer does not directly answer the question. IMHO there are two reasons one would want to know which class defined a method; first is to point fingers at a class in debug code (such as in exception handling), and the second is to determine if the method has been re-implemented (where method is a stub meant to be implemented by the programmer). This answer solves that second case in a different way.
if you get this error:
'function' object has no attribute 'im_class'
try this:
import inspect
def get_class_that_defined_method(meth):
class_func_defided = meth.__globals__[meth.__qualname__.split('.')[0]]
#full_func_name = "%s.%s.%s"%(class_func_defided.__module__,class_func_defided.__name__,meth.__name__)
if inspect.isfunction(class_func_defided):
print("%s is not part of a class."%meth.__name__)
return None
return class_func_defided
sample test:
class ExampleClass:
#staticmethod
def ex_static_method():
print("hello from static method")
def ex_instance_method(self):
print("hello from instance method")
def ex_funct(self):
print("hello from simple function")
if __name__ == "__main__":
static_method_class = get_class_that_defined_method(ExampleClass.ex_static_method)
static_method_class.ex_static_method()
instance_method_class = get_class_that_defined_method(ExampleClass.ex_instance_method)
instance_method_class().ex_instance_method()
function_class = get_class_that_defined_method(ex_funct)
>>> class Class:
... def method(self):
... print 'I have a self!'
...
>>> def function():
... print "I don't..."
...
>>> instance = Class()
>>> instance.method()
I have a self!
>>> instance.method = function
>>> instance.method()
I don't...
Okay the book quotes 'The self parameter (mentioned in the previous section) is, in fact, what distinguishes methods
from functions. Methods (or, more technically, bound methods) have their first parameter
bound to the instance they belong to: you don’t have to supply it. So while you can certainly
bind an attribute to a plain function, it won’t have that special self parameter:'
I am not able to understand what the author is trying to convey here ! I am new to oop in python . Please explain me .
Methods only exist on the class; assigning the function to the instance attribute as your example does creates an instance attribute containing the function, and not a method.
It means that affect of
class A:
def a(self):
print 'a'
def b(self, arg):
print arg
can be roughly represented by:
def A_a(self):
print a
def A_b(self, arg):
print arg
class A:
def __init__(self):
self.a = lambda: A_a(self)
self.b = lambda arg: A_b(self, arg)
So instance.a is not original function a which is written in class A, but another function which calls original with additional self argument.
How can I get the class that defined a method in Python?
I'd want the following example to print "__main__.FooClass":
class FooClass:
def foo_method(self):
print "foo"
class BarClass(FooClass):
pass
bar = BarClass()
print get_class_that_defined_method(bar.foo_method)
import inspect
def get_class_that_defined_method(meth):
for cls in inspect.getmro(meth.im_class):
if meth.__name__ in cls.__dict__:
return cls
return None
I don't know why no one has ever brought this up or why the top answer has 50 upvotes when it is slow as hell, but you can also do the following:
def get_class_that_defined_method(meth):
return meth.im_class.__name__
For python 3 I believe this changed and you'll need to look into .__qualname__.
In Python 3, if you need the actual class object you can do:
import sys
f = Foo.my_function
vars(sys.modules[f.__module__])[f.__qualname__.split('.')[0]] # Gets Foo object
If the function could belong to a nested class you would need to iterate as follows:
f = Foo.Bar.my_function
vals = vars(sys.modules[f.__module__])
for attr in f.__qualname__.split('.')[:-1]:
vals = vals[attr]
# vals is now the class Foo.Bar
Thanks Sr2222 for pointing out I was missing the point...
Here's the corrected approach which is just like Alex's but does not require to import anything. I don't think it's an improvement though, unless there's a huge hierarchy of inherited classes as this approach stops as soon as the defining class is found, instead of returning the whole inheritance as getmro does. As said, this is a very unlikely scenario.
def get_class_that_defined_method(method):
method_name = method.__name__
if method.__self__:
classes = [method.__self__.__class__]
else:
#unbound method
classes = [method.im_class]
while classes:
c = classes.pop()
if method_name in c.__dict__:
return c
else:
classes = list(c.__bases__) + classes
return None
And the Example:
>>> class A(object):
... def test(self): pass
>>> class B(A): pass
>>> class C(B): pass
>>> class D(A):
... def test(self): print 1
>>> class E(D,C): pass
>>> get_class_that_defined_method(A().test)
<class '__main__.A'>
>>> get_class_that_defined_method(A.test)
<class '__main__.A'>
>>> get_class_that_defined_method(B.test)
<class '__main__.A'>
>>> get_class_that_defined_method(C.test)
<class '__main__.A'>
>>> get_class_that_defined_method(D.test)
<class '__main__.D'>
>>> get_class_that_defined_method(E().test)
<class '__main__.D'>
>>> get_class_that_defined_method(E.test)
<class '__main__.D'>
>>> E().test()
1
Alex solution returns the same results. As long as Alex approach can be used, I would use it instead of this one.
Python 3
Solved it in a very simple way:
str(bar.foo_method).split(" ", 3)[-2]
This gives
'FooClass.foo_method'
Split on the dot to get the class and the function name separately
I found __qualname__ is useful in Python3.
I test it like that:
class Cls(object):
def func(self):
print('1')
c = Cls()
print(c.func.__qualname__)
# output is: 'Cls.func'
def single_func():
print(2)
print(single_func.__module__)
# output: '__main__'
print(single_func.__qualname__)
# output: 'single_func'
After my test, I found another answer here.
I started doing something somewhat similar, basically the idea was checking whenever a method in a base class had been implemented or not in a sub class. Turned out the way I originally did it I could not detect when an intermediate class was actually implementing the method.
My workaround for it was quite simple actually; setting a method attribute and testing its presence later. Here's an simplification of the whole thing:
class A():
def method(self):
pass
method._orig = None # This attribute will be gone once the method is implemented
def run_method(self, *args, **kwargs):
if hasattr(self.method, '_orig'):
raise Exception('method not implemented')
self.method(*args, **kwargs)
class B(A):
pass
class C(B):
def method(self):
pass
class D(C):
pass
B().run_method() # ==> Raises Exception: method not implemented
C().run_method() # OK
D().run_method() # OK
UPDATE: Actually call method() from run_method() (isn't that the spirit?) and have it pass all arguments unmodified to the method.
P.S.: This answer does not directly answer the question. IMHO there are two reasons one would want to know which class defined a method; first is to point fingers at a class in debug code (such as in exception handling), and the second is to determine if the method has been re-implemented (where method is a stub meant to be implemented by the programmer). This answer solves that second case in a different way.
if you get this error:
'function' object has no attribute 'im_class'
try this:
import inspect
def get_class_that_defined_method(meth):
class_func_defided = meth.__globals__[meth.__qualname__.split('.')[0]]
#full_func_name = "%s.%s.%s"%(class_func_defided.__module__,class_func_defided.__name__,meth.__name__)
if inspect.isfunction(class_func_defided):
print("%s is not part of a class."%meth.__name__)
return None
return class_func_defided
sample test:
class ExampleClass:
#staticmethod
def ex_static_method():
print("hello from static method")
def ex_instance_method(self):
print("hello from instance method")
def ex_funct(self):
print("hello from simple function")
if __name__ == "__main__":
static_method_class = get_class_that_defined_method(ExampleClass.ex_static_method)
static_method_class.ex_static_method()
instance_method_class = get_class_that_defined_method(ExampleClass.ex_instance_method)
instance_method_class().ex_instance_method()
function_class = get_class_that_defined_method(ex_funct)