Develop Reference

How to merge multiple csv with solving problem when file does not exist [duplicate]

How do I check whether a file exists or not, without using the try statement?

If the reason you're checking is so you can do something like if file_exists: open_it(), it's safer to use a try around the attempt to open it. Checking and then opening risks the file being deleted or moved or something between when you check and when you try to open it.
If you're not planning to open the file immediately, you can use os.path.isfile
Return True if path is an existing regular file. This follows symbolic links, so both islink() and isfile() can be true for the same path.
import os.path
os.path.isfile(fname)
if you need to be sure it's a file.
Starting with Python 3.4, the pathlib module offers an object-oriented approach (backported to pathlib2 in Python 2.7):
from pathlib import Path
my_file = Path("/path/to/file")
if my_file.is_file():
# file exists
To check a directory, do:
if my_file.is_dir():
# directory exists
To check whether a Path object exists independently of whether is it a file or directory, use exists():
if my_file.exists():
# path exists
You can also use resolve(strict=True) in a try block:
try:
my_abs_path = my_file.resolve(strict=True)
except FileNotFoundError:
# doesn't exist
else:
# exists

Use os.path.exists to check both files and directories:
import os.path
os.path.exists(file_path)
Use os.path.isfile to check only files (note: follows symbolic links):
os.path.isfile(file_path)

Unlike isfile(), exists() will return True for directories. So depending on if you want only plain files or also directories, you'll use isfile() or exists(). Here is some simple REPL output:
>>> os.path.isfile("/etc/password.txt")
True
>>> os.path.isfile("/etc")
False
>>> os.path.isfile("/does/not/exist")
False
>>> os.path.exists("/etc/password.txt")
True
>>> os.path.exists("/etc")
True
>>> os.path.exists("/does/not/exist")
False

import os
if os.path.isfile(filepath):
print("File exists")

Use os.path.isfile() with os.access():
import os
PATH = './file.txt'
if os.path.isfile(PATH) and os.access(PATH, os.R_OK):
print("File exists and is readable")
else:
print("Either the file is missing or not readable")

import os
os.path.exists(path) # Returns whether the path (directory or file) exists or not
os.path.isfile(path) # Returns whether the file exists or not

Although almost every possible way has been listed in (at least one of) the existing answers (e.g. Python 3.4 specific stuff was added), I'll try to group everything together.
Note: every piece of Python standard library code that I'm going to post, belongs to version 3.5.3.
Problem statement:
Check file (arguable: also folder ("special" file) ?) existence
Don't use try / except / else / finally blocks
Possible solutions:
1. [Python.Docs]: os.path.exists(path)
Also check other function family members like os.path.isfile, os.path.isdir, os.path.lexists for slightly different behaviors:
Return True if path refers to an existing path or an open file descriptor. Returns False for broken symbolic links. On some platforms, this function may return False if permission is not granted to execute os.stat() on the requested file, even if the path physically exists.
All good, but if following the import tree:
os.path - posixpath.py (ntpath.py)
genericpath.py - line ~20+
def exists(path):
"""Test whether a path exists. Returns False for broken symbolic links"""
try:
st = os.stat(path)
except os.error:
return False
return True
it's just a try / except block around [Python.Docs]: os.stat(path, *, dir_fd=None, follow_symlinks=True). So, your code is try / except free, but lower in the framestack there's (at least) one such block. This also applies to other functions (including os.path.isfile).
1.1. [Python.Docs]: pathlib - Path.is_file()
It's a fancier (and more [Wiktionary]: Pythonic) way of handling paths, but
Under the hood, it does exactly the same thing (pathlib.py - line ~1330):
def is_file(self):
"""
Whether this path is a regular file (also True for symlinks pointing
to regular files).
"""
try:
return S_ISREG(self.stat().st_mode)
except OSError as e:
if e.errno not in (ENOENT, ENOTDIR):
raise
# Path doesn't exist or is a broken symlink
# (see https://bitbucket.org/pitrou/pathlib/issue/12/)
return False
2. [Python.Docs]: With Statement Context Managers
Either:
Create one:
class Swallow: # Dummy example
swallowed_exceptions = (FileNotFoundError,)
def __enter__(self):
print("Entering...")
def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_value, exc_traceback):
print("Exiting:", exc_type, exc_value, exc_traceback)
# Only swallow FileNotFoundError (not e.g. TypeError - if the user passes a wrong argument like None or float or ...)
return exc_type in Swallow.swallowed_exceptions
And its usage - I'll replicate the os.path.isfile behavior (note that this is just for demonstrating purposes, do not attempt to write such code for production):
import os
import stat
def isfile_seaman(path): # Dummy func
result = False
with Swallow():
result = stat.S_ISREG(os.stat(path).st_mode)
return result
Use [Python.Docs]: contextlib.suppress(*exceptions) - which was specifically designed for selectively suppressing exceptions
But, they seem to be wrappers over try / except / else / finally blocks, as [Python.Docs]: Compound statements - The with statement states:
This allows common try...except...finally usage patterns to be encapsulated for convenient reuse.
3. Filesystem traversal functions
Search the results for matching item(s):
[Python.Docs]: os.listdir(path='.') (or [Python.Docs]: os.scandir(path='.') on Python v3.5+, backport: [PyPI]: scandir)
Under the hood, both use:
Nix: [Man7]: OPENDIR(3) / [Man7]: READDIR(3) / [Man7]: CLOSEDIR(3)
Win: [MS.Learn]: FindFirstFileW function (fileapi.h) / [MS.Learn]: FindNextFileW function (fileapi.h) / [MS.Learn]: FindClose function (fileapi.h)
via [GitHub]: python/cpython - (main) cpython/Modules/posixmodule.c
Using scandir() instead of listdir() can significantly increase the performance of code that also needs file type or file attribute information, because os.DirEntry objects expose this information if the operating system provides it when scanning a directory. All os.DirEntry methods may perform a system call, but is_dir() and is_file() usually only require a system call for symbolic links; os.DirEntry.stat() always requires a system call on Unix, but only requires one for symbolic links on Windows.
[Python.Docs]: os.walk(top, topdown=True, onerror=None, followlinks=False)
Uses os.listdir (os.scandir when available)
[Python.Docs]: glob.iglob(pathname, *, root_dir=None, dir_fd=None, recursive=False, include_hidden=False) (or its predecessor: glob.glob)
Doesn't seem a traversing function per se (at least in some cases), but it still uses os.listdir
Since these iterate over folders, (in most of the cases) they are inefficient for our problem (there are exceptions, like non wildcarded globbing - as #ShadowRanger pointed out), so I'm not going to insist on them. Not to mention that in some cases, filename processing might be required.
4. [Python.Docs]: os.access(path, mode, *, dir_fd=None, effective_ids=False, follow_symlinks=True)
Its behavior is close to os.path.exists (actually it's wider, mainly because of the 2nd argument).
User permissions might restrict the file "visibility" as the doc states:
... test if the invoking user has the specified access to path. mode should be F_OK to test the existence of path...
Security considerations:
Using access() to check if a user is authorized to e.g. open a file before actually doing so using open() creates a security hole, because the user might exploit the short time interval between checking and opening the file to manipulate it.
os.access("/tmp", os.F_OK)
Since I also work in C, I use this method as well because under the hood, it calls native APIs (again, via "${PYTHON_SRC_DIR}/Modules/posixmodule.c"), but it also opens a gate for possible user errors, and it's not as Pythonic as other variants. So, don't use it unless you know what you're doing:
Nix: [Man7]: ACCESS(2)
Warning: Using these calls to check if a user is authorized to, for example, open a file before actually doing so using open(2) creates a security hole, because the user might exploit the short time interval between checking and opening the file to manipulate it. For this reason, the use of this system call should be avoided.
Win: [MS.Learn]: GetFileAttributesW function (fileapi.h)
As seen, this approach is highly discouraged (especially on Nix).
Note: calling native APIs is also possible via [Python.Docs]: ctypes - A foreign function library for Python, but in most cases it's more complicated. Before working with CTypes, check [SO]: C function called from Python via ctypes returns incorrect value (#CristiFati's answer) out.
(Win specific): since vcruntime###.dll (msvcr###.dll for older VStudio versions - I'm going to refer to it as UCRT) exports a [MS.Learn]: _access, _waccess function family as well, here's an example (note that the recommended [Python.Docs]: msvcrt - Useful routines from the MS VC++ runtime doesn't export them):
Python 3.5.3 (v3.5.3:1880cb95a742, Jan 16 2017, 16:02:32) [MSC v.1900 64 bit (AMD64)] on win32
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import ctypes as cts, os
>>> cts.CDLL("msvcrt")._waccess(u"C:\\Windows\\Temp", os.F_OK)
0
>>> cts.CDLL("msvcrt")._waccess(u"C:\\Windows\\Temp.notexist", os.F_OK)
-1
Notes:
Although it's not a good practice, I'm using os.F_OK in the call, but that's just for clarity (its value is 0)
I'm using _waccess so that the same code works on Python 3 and Python 2 (in spite of [Wikipedia]: Unicode related differences between them - [SO]: Passing utf-16 string to a Windows function (#CristiFati's answer))
Although this targets a very specific area, it was not mentioned in any of the previous answers
The Linux (Ubuntu ([Wikipedia]: Ubuntu version history) 16 x86_64 (pc064)) counterpart as well:
Python 3.5.2 (default, Nov 17 2016, 17:05:23)
[GCC 5.4.0 20160609] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import ctypes as cts, os
>>> cts.CDLL("/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6").access(b"/tmp", os.F_OK)
0
>>> cts.CDLL("/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6").access(b"/tmp.notexist", os.F_OK)
-1
Notes:
Instead hardcoding libc.so (LibC)'s path ("/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6") which may (and most likely, will) vary across systems, None (or the empty string) can be passed to CDLL constructor (ctypes.CDLL(None).access(b"/tmp", os.F_OK)). According to [Man7]: DLOPEN(3):
If filename is NULL, then the returned handle is for the main
program. When given to dlsym(3), this handle causes a search for a
symbol in the main program, followed by all shared objects loaded at
program startup, and then all shared objects loaded by dlopen() with
the flag RTLD_GLOBAL.
Main (current) program (python) is linked against LibC, so its symbols (including access) will be loaded
This has to be handled with care, since functions like main, Py_Main and (all the) others are available; calling them could have disastrous effects (on the current program)
This doesn't also apply to Windows (but that's not such a big deal, since UCRT is located in "%SystemRoot%\System32" which is in %PATH% by default). I wanted to take things further and replicate this behavior on Windows (and submit a patch), but as it turns out, [MS.Learn]: GetProcAddress function (libloaderapi.h) only "sees" exported symbols, so unless someone declares the functions in the main executable as __declspec(dllexport) (why on Earth the common person would do that?), the main program is loadable, but it is pretty much unusable
5. 3rd-party modules with filesystem capabilities
Most likely, will rely on one of the ways above (maybe with slight customizations). One example would be (again, Win specific) [GitHub]: mhammond/pywin32 - Python for Windows (pywin32) Extensions, which is a Python wrapper over WinAPIs.
But, since this is more like a workaround, I'm stopping here.
6. SysAdmin approach
I consider this a (lame) workaround (gainarie): use Python as a wrapper to execute shell commands:
Win:
(py35x64_test) [cfati#CFATI-5510-0:e:\Work\Dev\StackOverflow\q000082831]> "e:\Work\Dev\VEnvs\py35x64_test\Scripts\python.exe" -c "import os; print(os.system('dir /b \"C:\\Windows\\Temp\" > nul 2>&1'))"
0
(py35x64_test) [cfati#CFATI-5510-0:e:\Work\Dev\StackOverflow\q000082831]> "e:\Work\Dev\VEnvs\py35x64_test\Scripts\python.exe" -c "import os; print(os.system('dir /b \"C:\\Windows\\Temp.notexist\" > nul 2>&1'))"
1
Nix ([Wikipedia]: Unix-like) - Ubuntu:
[cfati#cfati-5510-0:/mnt/e/Work/Dev/StackOverflow/q000082831]> python3 -c "import os; print(os.system('ls \"/tmp\" > /dev/null 2>&1'))"
0
[cfati#cfati-5510-0:/mnt/e/Work/Dev/StackOverflow/q000082831]> python3 -c "import os; print(os.system('ls \"/tmp.notexist\" > /dev/null 2>&1'))"
512
Bottom line:
Do use try / except / else / finally blocks, because they can prevent you running into a series of nasty problems
A possible counterexample that I can think of, is performance: such blocks are costly, so try not to place them in code that it's supposed to run hundreds of thousands times per second (but since (in most cases) it involves disk access, it won't be the case)

Python 3.4+ has an object-oriented path module: pathlib. Using this new module, you can check whether a file exists like this:
import pathlib
p = pathlib.Path('path/to/file')
if p.is_file(): # or p.is_dir() to see if it is a directory
# do stuff
You can (and usually should) still use a try/except block when opening files:
try:
with p.open() as f:
# do awesome stuff
except OSError:
print('Well darn.')
The pathlib module has lots of cool stuff in it: convenient globbing, checking file's owner, easier path joining, etc. It's worth checking out. If you're on an older Python (version 2.6 or later), you can still install pathlib with pip:
# installs pathlib2 on older Python versions
# the original third-party module, pathlib, is no longer maintained.
pip install pathlib2
Then import it as follows:
# Older Python versions
import pathlib2 as pathlib

This is the simplest way to check if a file exists. Just because the file existed when you checked doesn't guarantee that it will be there when you need to open it.
import os
fname = "foo.txt"
if os.path.isfile(fname):
print("file does exist at this time")
else:
print("no such file exists at this time")

How do I check whether a file exists, using Python, without using a try statement?
Now available since Python 3.4, import and instantiate a Path object with the file name, and check the is_file method (note that this returns True for symlinks pointing to regular files as well):
>>> from pathlib import Path
>>> Path('/').is_file()
False
>>> Path('/initrd.img').is_file()
True
>>> Path('/doesnotexist').is_file()
False
If you're on Python 2, you can backport the pathlib module from pypi, pathlib2, or otherwise check isfile from the os.path module:
>>> import os
>>> os.path.isfile('/')
False
>>> os.path.isfile('/initrd.img')
True
>>> os.path.isfile('/doesnotexist')
False
Now the above is probably the best pragmatic direct answer here, but there's the possibility of a race condition (depending on what you're trying to accomplish), and the fact that the underlying implementation uses a try, but Python uses try everywhere in its implementation.
Because Python uses try everywhere, there's really no reason to avoid an implementation that uses it.
But the rest of this answer attempts to consider these caveats.
Longer, much more pedantic answer
Available since Python 3.4, use the new Path object in pathlib. Note that .exists is not quite right, because directories are not files (except in the unix sense that everything is a file).
>>> from pathlib import Path
>>> root = Path('/')
>>> root.exists()
True
So we need to use is_file:
>>> root.is_file()
False
Here's the help on is_file:
is_file(self)
Whether this path is a regular file (also True for symlinks pointing
to regular files).
So let's get a file that we know is a file:
>>> import tempfile
>>> file = tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile()
>>> filepathobj = Path(file.name)
>>> filepathobj.is_file()
True
>>> filepathobj.exists()
True
By default, NamedTemporaryFile deletes the file when closed (and will automatically close when no more references exist to it).
>>> del file
>>> filepathobj.exists()
False
>>> filepathobj.is_file()
False
If you dig into the implementation, though, you'll see that is_file uses try:
def is_file(self):
"""
Whether this path is a regular file (also True for symlinks pointing
to regular files).
"""
try:
return S_ISREG(self.stat().st_mode)
except OSError as e:
if e.errno not in (ENOENT, ENOTDIR):
raise
# Path doesn't exist or is a broken symlink
# (see https://bitbucket.org/pitrou/pathlib/issue/12/)
return False
Race Conditions: Why we like try
We like try because it avoids race conditions. With try, you simply attempt to read your file, expecting it to be there, and if not, you catch the exception and perform whatever fallback behavior makes sense.
If you want to check that a file exists before you attempt to read it, and you might be deleting it and then you might be using multiple threads or processes, or another program knows about that file and could delete it - you risk the chance of a race condition if you check it exists, because you are then racing to open it before its condition (its existence) changes.
Race conditions are very hard to debug because there's a very small window in which they can cause your program to fail.
But if this is your motivation, you can get the value of a try statement by using the suppress context manager.
Avoiding race conditions without a try statement: suppress
Python 3.4 gives us the suppress context manager (previously the ignore context manager), which does semantically exactly the same thing in fewer lines, while also (at least superficially) meeting the original ask to avoid a try statement:
from contextlib import suppress
from pathlib import Path
Usage:
>>> with suppress(OSError), Path('doesnotexist').open() as f:
... for line in f:
... print(line)
...
>>>
>>> with suppress(OSError):
... Path('doesnotexist').unlink()
...
>>>
For earlier Pythons, you could roll your own suppress, but without a try will be more verbose than with. I do believe this actually is the only answer that doesn't use try at any level in the Python that can be applied to prior to Python 3.4 because it uses a context manager instead:
class suppress(object):
def __init__(self, *exceptions):
self.exceptions = exceptions
def __enter__(self):
return self
def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_value, traceback):
if exc_type is not None:
return issubclass(exc_type, self.exceptions)
Perhaps easier with a try:
from contextlib import contextmanager
#contextmanager
def suppress(*exceptions):
try:
yield
except exceptions:
pass
Other options that don't meet the ask for "without try":
isfile
import os
os.path.isfile(path)
from the docs:
os.path.isfile(path)
Return True if path is an existing regular file. This follows symbolic
links, so both islink() and isfile() can be true for the same path.
But if you examine the source of this function, you'll see it actually does use a try statement:
# This follows symbolic links, so both islink() and isdir() can be true
# for the same path on systems that support symlinks
def isfile(path):
"""Test whether a path is a regular file"""
try:
st = os.stat(path)
except os.error:
return False
return stat.S_ISREG(st.st_mode)
>>> OSError is os.error
True
All it's doing is using the given path to see if it can get stats on it, catching OSError and then checking if it's a file if it didn't raise the exception.
If you intend to do something with the file, I would suggest directly attempting it with a try-except to avoid a race condition:
try:
with open(path) as f:
f.read()
except OSError:
pass
os.access
Available for Unix and Windows is os.access, but to use you must pass flags, and it does not differentiate between files and directories. This is more used to test if the real invoking user has access in an elevated privilege environment:
import os
os.access(path, os.F_OK)
It also suffers from the same race condition problems as isfile. From the docs:
Note:
Using access() to check if a user is authorized to e.g. open a file
before actually doing so using open() creates a security hole, because
the user might exploit the short time interval between checking and
opening the file to manipulate it. It’s preferable to use EAFP
techniques. For example:
if os.access("myfile", os.R_OK):
with open("myfile") as fp:
return fp.read()
return "some default data"
is better written as:
try:
fp = open("myfile")
except IOError as e:
if e.errno == errno.EACCES:
return "some default data"
# Not a permission error.
raise
else:
with fp:
return fp.read()
Avoid using os.access. It is a low level function that has more opportunities for user error than the higher level objects and functions discussed above.
Criticism of another answer:
Another answer says this about os.access:
Personally, I prefer this one because under the hood, it calls native APIs (via "${PYTHON_SRC_DIR}/Modules/posixmodule.c"), but it also opens a gate for possible user errors, and it's not as Pythonic as other variants:
This answer says it prefers a non-Pythonic, error-prone method, with no justification. It seems to encourage users to use low-level APIs without understanding them.
It also creates a context manager which, by unconditionally returning True, allows all Exceptions (including KeyboardInterrupt and SystemExit!) to pass silently, which is a good way to hide bugs.
This seems to encourage users to adopt poor practices.

Prefer the try statement. It's considered better style and avoids race conditions.
Don't take my word for it. There's plenty of support for this theory. Here's a couple:
Style: Section "Handling unusual conditions" of these course notes for Software Design (2007)
Avoiding Race Conditions

Use:
import os
#Your path here e.g. "C:\Program Files\text.txt"
#For access purposes: "C:\\Program Files\\text.txt"
if os.path.exists("C:\..."):
print "File found!"
else:
print "File not found!"
Importing os makes it easier to navigate and perform standard actions with your operating system.
For reference, also see How do I check whether a file exists without exceptions?.
If you need high-level operations, use shutil.

Testing for files and folders with os.path.isfile(), os.path.isdir() and os.path.exists()
Assuming that the "path" is a valid path, this table shows what is returned by each function for files and folders:
You can also test if a file is a certain type of file using os.path.splitext() to get the extension (if you don't already know it)
>>> import os
>>> path = "path to a word document"
>>> os.path.isfile(path)
True
>>> os.path.splitext(path)[1] == ".docx" # test if the extension is .docx
True

TL;DR
The answer is: use the pathlib module
Pathlib is probably the most modern and convenient way for almost all of the file operations. For the existence of a file or a folder a single line of code is enough. If file is not exists, it will not throw any exception.
from pathlib import Path
if Path("myfile.txt").exists(): # works for both file and folders
# do your cool stuff...
The pathlib module was introduced in Python 3.4, so you need to have Python 3.4+. This library makes your life much easier while working with files and folders, and it is pretty to use. Here is more documentation about it: pathlib — Object-oriented filesystem paths.
BTW, if you are going to reuse the path, then it is better to assign it to a variable.
So it will become:
from pathlib import Path
p = Path("loc/of/myfile.txt")
if p.exists(): # works for both file and folders
# do stuffs...
#reuse 'p' if needed.

In 2016 the best way is still using os.path.isfile:
>>> os.path.isfile('/path/to/some/file.txt')
Or in Python 3 you can use pathlib:
import pathlib
path = pathlib.Path('/path/to/some/file.txt')
if path.is_file():
...

It doesn't seem like there's a meaningful functional difference between try/except and isfile(), so you should use which one makes sense.
If you want to read a file, if it exists, do
try:
f = open(filepath)
except IOError:
print 'Oh dear.'
But if you just wanted to rename a file if it exists, and therefore don't need to open it, do
if os.path.isfile(filepath):
os.rename(filepath, filepath + '.old')
If you want to write to a file, if it doesn't exist, do
# Python 2
if not os.path.isfile(filepath):
f = open(filepath, 'w')
# Python 3: x opens for exclusive creation, failing if the file already exists
try:
f = open(filepath, 'wx')
except IOError:
print 'file already exists'
If you need file locking, that's a different matter.

You could try this (safer):
try:
# http://effbot.org/zone/python-with-statement.htm
# 'with' is safer to open a file
with open('whatever.txt') as fh:
# Do something with 'fh'
except IOError as e:
print("({})".format(e))
The ouput would be:
([Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'whatever.txt')
Then, depending on the result, your program can just keep running from there or you can code to stop it if you want.

Date: 2017-12-04
Every possible solution has been listed in other answers.
An intuitive and arguable way to check if a file exists is the following:
import os
os.path.isfile('~/file.md') # Returns True if exists, else False
# Additionally, check a directory
os.path.isdir('~/folder') # Returns True if the folder exists, else False
# Check either a directory or a file
os.path.exists('~/file')
I made an exhaustive cheat sheet for your reference:
# os.path methods in exhaustive cheat sheet
{'definition': ['dirname',
'basename',
'abspath',
'relpath',
'commonpath',
'normpath',
'realpath'],
'operation': ['split', 'splitdrive', 'splitext',
'join', 'normcase'],
'compare': ['samefile', 'sameopenfile', 'samestat'],
'condition': ['isdir',
'isfile',
'exists',
'lexists'
'islink',
'isabs',
'ismount',],
'expand': ['expanduser',
'expandvars'],
'stat': ['getatime', 'getctime', 'getmtime',
'getsize']}

Although I always recommend using try and except statements, here are a few possibilities for you (my personal favourite is using os.access):
Try opening the file:
Opening the file will always verify the existence of the file. You can make a function just like so:
def File_Existence(filepath):
f = open(filepath)
return True
If it's False, it will stop execution with an unhanded IOError
or OSError in later versions of Python. To catch the exception,
you have to use a try except clause. Of course, you can always
use a try except` statement like so (thanks to hsandt
for making me think):
def File_Existence(filepath):
try:
f = open(filepath)
except IOError, OSError: # Note OSError is for later versions of Python
return False
return True
Use os.path.exists(path):
This will check the existence of what you specify. However, it checks for files and directories so beware about how you use it.
import os.path
>>> os.path.exists("this/is/a/directory")
True
>>> os.path.exists("this/is/a/file.txt")
True
>>> os.path.exists("not/a/directory")
False
Use os.access(path, mode):
This will check whether you have access to the file. It will check for permissions. Based on the os.py documentation, typing in os.F_OK, it will check the existence of the path. However, using this will create a security hole, as someone can attack your file using the time between checking the permissions and opening the file. You should instead go directly to opening the file instead of checking its permissions. (EAFP vs LBYP). If you're not going to open the file afterwards, and only checking its existence, then you can use this.
Anyway, here:
>>> import os
>>> os.access("/is/a/file.txt", os.F_OK)
True
I should also mention that there are two ways that you will not be able to verify the existence of a file. Either the issue will be permission denied or no such file or directory. If you catch an IOError, set the IOError as e (like my first option), and then type in print(e.args) so that you can hopefully determine your issue. I hope it helps! :)

If the file is for opening you could use one of the following techniques:
with open('somefile', 'xt') as f: # Using the x-flag, Python 3.3 and above
f.write('Hello\n')
if not os.path.exists('somefile'):
with open('somefile', 'wt') as f:
f.write("Hello\n")
else:
print('File already exists!')
Note: This finds either a file or a directory with the given name.

Additionally, os.access():
if os.access("myfile", os.R_OK):
with open("myfile") as fp:
return fp.read()
Being R_OK, W_OK, and X_OK the flags to test for permissions (doc).

if os.path.isfile(path_to_file):
try:
open(path_to_file)
pass
except IOError as e:
print "Unable to open file"
Raising exceptions is considered to be an acceptable, and Pythonic,
approach for flow control in your program. Consider handling missing
files with IOErrors. In this situation, an IOError exception will be
raised if the file exists but the user does not have read permissions.
Source: Using Python: How To Check If A File Exists

If you imported NumPy already for other purposes then there is no need to import other libraries like pathlib, os, paths, etc.
import numpy as np
np.DataSource().exists("path/to/your/file")
This will return true or false based on its existence.

Check file or directory exists
You can follow these three ways:
1. Using isfile()
Note 1: The os.path.isfile used only for files
import os.path
os.path.isfile(filename) # True if file exists
os.path.isfile(dirname) # False if directory exists
2. Using exists
Note 2: The os.path.exists is used for both files and directories
import os.path
os.path.exists(filename) # True if file exists
os.path.exists(dirname) # True if directory exists
3. The pathlib.Path method (included in Python 3+, installable with pip for Python 2)
from pathlib import Path
Path(filename).exists()

You can write Brian's suggestion without the try:.
from contextlib import suppress
with suppress(IOError), open('filename'):
process()
suppress is part of Python 3.4. In older releases you can quickly write your own suppress:
from contextlib import contextmanager
#contextmanager
def suppress(*exceptions):
try:
yield
except exceptions:
pass

I'm the author of a package that's been around for about 10 years, and it has a function that addresses this question directly. Basically, if you are on a non-Windows system, it uses Popen to access find. However, if you are on Windows, it replicates find with an efficient filesystem walker.
The code itself does not use a try block… except in determining the operating system and thus steering you to the "Unix"-style find or the hand-buillt find. Timing tests showed that the try was faster in determining the OS, so I did use one there (but nowhere else).
>>> import pox
>>> pox.find('*python*', type='file', root=pox.homedir(), recurse=False)
['/Users/mmckerns/.python']
And the doc…
>>> print pox.find.__doc__
find(patterns[,root,recurse,type]); Get path to a file or directory
patterns: name or partial name string of items to search for
root: path string of top-level directory to search
recurse: if True, recurse down from root directory
type: item filter; one of {None, file, dir, link, socket, block, char}
verbose: if True, be a little verbose about the search
On some OS, recursion can be specified by recursion depth (an integer).
patterns can be specified with basic pattern matching. Additionally,
multiple patterns can be specified by splitting patterns with a ';'
For example:
>>> find('pox*', root='..')
['/Users/foo/pox/pox', '/Users/foo/pox/scripts/pox_launcher.py']
>>> find('*shutils*;*init*')
['/Users/foo/pox/pox/shutils.py', '/Users/foo/pox/pox/__init__.py']
>>>
The implementation, if you care to look, is here:
https://github.com/uqfoundation/pox/blob/89f90fb308f285ca7a62eabe2c38acb87e89dad9/pox/shutils.py#L190

Adding one more slight variation which isn't exactly reflected in the other answers.
This will handle the case of the file_path being None or empty string.
def file_exists(file_path):
if not file_path:
return False
elif not os.path.isfile(file_path):
return False
else:
return True
Adding a variant based on suggestion from Shahbaz
def file_exists(file_path):
if not file_path:
return False
else:
return os.path.isfile(file_path)
Adding a variant based on suggestion from Peter Wood
def file_exists(file_path):
return file_path and os.path.isfile(file_path):

Here's a one-line Python command for the Linux command line environment. I find this very handy since I'm not such a hot Bash guy.
python -c "import os.path; print os.path.isfile('/path_to/file.xxx')"

You can use the "OS" library of Python:
>>> import os
>>> os.path.exists("C:\\Users\\####\\Desktop\\test.txt")
True
>>> os.path.exists("C:\\Users\\####\\Desktop\\test.tx")
False

How do I check whether a file exists, without using the try statement?
In 2016, this is still arguably the easiest way to check if both a file exists and if it is a file:
import os
os.path.isfile('./file.txt') # Returns True if exists, else False
isfile is actually just a helper method that internally uses os.stat and stat.S_ISREG(mode) underneath. This os.stat is a lower-level method that will provide you with detailed information about files, directories, sockets, buffers, and more. More about os.stat here
Note: However, this approach will not lock the file in any way and therefore your code can become vulnerable to "time of check to time of use" (TOCTTOU) bugs.
So raising exceptions is considered to be an acceptable, and Pythonic, approach for flow control in your program. And one should consider handling missing files with IOErrors, rather than if statements (just an advice).

How to write if there is no file in python [duplicate]

How do I check whether a file exists or not, without using the try statement?

If the reason you're checking is so you can do something like if file_exists: open_it(), it's safer to use a try around the attempt to open it. Checking and then opening risks the file being deleted or moved or something between when you check and when you try to open it.
If you're not planning to open the file immediately, you can use os.path.isfile
Return True if path is an existing regular file. This follows symbolic links, so both islink() and isfile() can be true for the same path.
import os.path
os.path.isfile(fname)
if you need to be sure it's a file.
Starting with Python 3.4, the pathlib module offers an object-oriented approach (backported to pathlib2 in Python 2.7):
from pathlib import Path
my_file = Path("/path/to/file")
if my_file.is_file():
# file exists
To check a directory, do:
if my_file.is_dir():
# directory exists
To check whether a Path object exists independently of whether is it a file or directory, use exists():
if my_file.exists():
# path exists
You can also use resolve(strict=True) in a try block:
try:
my_abs_path = my_file.resolve(strict=True)
except FileNotFoundError:
# doesn't exist
else:
# exists

Use os.path.exists to check both files and directories:
import os.path
os.path.exists(file_path)
Use os.path.isfile to check only files (note: follows symbolic links):
os.path.isfile(file_path)

Unlike isfile(), exists() will return True for directories. So depending on if you want only plain files or also directories, you'll use isfile() or exists(). Here is some simple REPL output:
>>> os.path.isfile("/etc/password.txt")
True
>>> os.path.isfile("/etc")
False
>>> os.path.isfile("/does/not/exist")
False
>>> os.path.exists("/etc/password.txt")
True
>>> os.path.exists("/etc")
True
>>> os.path.exists("/does/not/exist")
False

import os
if os.path.isfile(filepath):
print("File exists")

Use os.path.isfile() with os.access():
import os
PATH = './file.txt'
if os.path.isfile(PATH) and os.access(PATH, os.R_OK):
print("File exists and is readable")
else:
print("Either the file is missing or not readable")

import os
os.path.exists(path) # Returns whether the path (directory or file) exists or not
os.path.isfile(path) # Returns whether the file exists or not

Although almost every possible way has been listed in (at least one of) the existing answers (e.g. Python 3.4 specific stuff was added), I'll try to group everything together.
Note: every piece of Python standard library code that I'm going to post, belongs to version 3.5.3.
Problem statement:
Check file (arguable: also folder ("special" file) ?) existence
Don't use try / except / else / finally blocks
Possible solutions:
1. [Python.Docs]: os.path.exists(path)
Also check other function family members like os.path.isfile, os.path.isdir, os.path.lexists for slightly different behaviors:
Return True if path refers to an existing path or an open file descriptor. Returns False for broken symbolic links. On some platforms, this function may return False if permission is not granted to execute os.stat() on the requested file, even if the path physically exists.
All good, but if following the import tree:
os.path - posixpath.py (ntpath.py)
genericpath.py - line ~20+
def exists(path):
"""Test whether a path exists. Returns False for broken symbolic links"""
try:
st = os.stat(path)
except os.error:
return False
return True
it's just a try / except block around [Python.Docs]: os.stat(path, *, dir_fd=None, follow_symlinks=True). So, your code is try / except free, but lower in the framestack there's (at least) one such block. This also applies to other functions (including os.path.isfile).
1.1. [Python.Docs]: pathlib - Path.is_file()
It's a fancier (and more [Wiktionary]: Pythonic) way of handling paths, but
Under the hood, it does exactly the same thing (pathlib.py - line ~1330):
def is_file(self):
"""
Whether this path is a regular file (also True for symlinks pointing
to regular files).
"""
try:
return S_ISREG(self.stat().st_mode)
except OSError as e:
if e.errno not in (ENOENT, ENOTDIR):
raise
# Path doesn't exist or is a broken symlink
# (see https://bitbucket.org/pitrou/pathlib/issue/12/)
return False
2. [Python.Docs]: With Statement Context Managers
Either:
Create one:
class Swallow: # Dummy example
swallowed_exceptions = (FileNotFoundError,)
def __enter__(self):
print("Entering...")
def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_value, exc_traceback):
print("Exiting:", exc_type, exc_value, exc_traceback)
# Only swallow FileNotFoundError (not e.g. TypeError - if the user passes a wrong argument like None or float or ...)
return exc_type in Swallow.swallowed_exceptions
And its usage - I'll replicate the os.path.isfile behavior (note that this is just for demonstrating purposes, do not attempt to write such code for production):
import os
import stat
def isfile_seaman(path): # Dummy func
result = False
with Swallow():
result = stat.S_ISREG(os.stat(path).st_mode)
return result
Use [Python.Docs]: contextlib.suppress(*exceptions) - which was specifically designed for selectively suppressing exceptions
But, they seem to be wrappers over try / except / else / finally blocks, as [Python.Docs]: Compound statements - The with statement states:
This allows common try...except...finally usage patterns to be encapsulated for convenient reuse.
3. Filesystem traversal functions
Search the results for matching item(s):
[Python.Docs]: os.listdir(path='.') (or [Python.Docs]: os.scandir(path='.') on Python v3.5+, backport: [PyPI]: scandir)
Under the hood, both use:
Nix: [Man7]: OPENDIR(3) / [Man7]: READDIR(3) / [Man7]: CLOSEDIR(3)
Win: [MS.Learn]: FindFirstFileW function (fileapi.h) / [MS.Learn]: FindNextFileW function (fileapi.h) / [MS.Learn]: FindClose function (fileapi.h)
via [GitHub]: python/cpython - (main) cpython/Modules/posixmodule.c
Using scandir() instead of listdir() can significantly increase the performance of code that also needs file type or file attribute information, because os.DirEntry objects expose this information if the operating system provides it when scanning a directory. All os.DirEntry methods may perform a system call, but is_dir() and is_file() usually only require a system call for symbolic links; os.DirEntry.stat() always requires a system call on Unix, but only requires one for symbolic links on Windows.
[Python.Docs]: os.walk(top, topdown=True, onerror=None, followlinks=False)
Uses os.listdir (os.scandir when available)
[Python.Docs]: glob.iglob(pathname, *, root_dir=None, dir_fd=None, recursive=False, include_hidden=False) (or its predecessor: glob.glob)
Doesn't seem a traversing function per se (at least in some cases), but it still uses os.listdir
Since these iterate over folders, (in most of the cases) they are inefficient for our problem (there are exceptions, like non wildcarded globbing - as #ShadowRanger pointed out), so I'm not going to insist on them. Not to mention that in some cases, filename processing might be required.
4. [Python.Docs]: os.access(path, mode, *, dir_fd=None, effective_ids=False, follow_symlinks=True)
Its behavior is close to os.path.exists (actually it's wider, mainly because of the 2nd argument).
User permissions might restrict the file "visibility" as the doc states:
... test if the invoking user has the specified access to path. mode should be F_OK to test the existence of path...
Security considerations:
Using access() to check if a user is authorized to e.g. open a file before actually doing so using open() creates a security hole, because the user might exploit the short time interval between checking and opening the file to manipulate it.
os.access("/tmp", os.F_OK)
Since I also work in C, I use this method as well because under the hood, it calls native APIs (again, via "${PYTHON_SRC_DIR}/Modules/posixmodule.c"), but it also opens a gate for possible user errors, and it's not as Pythonic as other variants. So, don't use it unless you know what you're doing:
Nix: [Man7]: ACCESS(2)
Warning: Using these calls to check if a user is authorized to, for example, open a file before actually doing so using open(2) creates a security hole, because the user might exploit the short time interval between checking and opening the file to manipulate it. For this reason, the use of this system call should be avoided.
Win: [MS.Learn]: GetFileAttributesW function (fileapi.h)
As seen, this approach is highly discouraged (especially on Nix).
Note: calling native APIs is also possible via [Python.Docs]: ctypes - A foreign function library for Python, but in most cases it's more complicated. Before working with CTypes, check [SO]: C function called from Python via ctypes returns incorrect value (#CristiFati's answer) out.
(Win specific): since vcruntime###.dll (msvcr###.dll for older VStudio versions - I'm going to refer to it as UCRT) exports a [MS.Learn]: _access, _waccess function family as well, here's an example (note that the recommended [Python.Docs]: msvcrt - Useful routines from the MS VC++ runtime doesn't export them):
Python 3.5.3 (v3.5.3:1880cb95a742, Jan 16 2017, 16:02:32) [MSC v.1900 64 bit (AMD64)] on win32
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import ctypes as cts, os
>>> cts.CDLL("msvcrt")._waccess(u"C:\\Windows\\Temp", os.F_OK)
0
>>> cts.CDLL("msvcrt")._waccess(u"C:\\Windows\\Temp.notexist", os.F_OK)
-1
Notes:
Although it's not a good practice, I'm using os.F_OK in the call, but that's just for clarity (its value is 0)
I'm using _waccess so that the same code works on Python 3 and Python 2 (in spite of [Wikipedia]: Unicode related differences between them - [SO]: Passing utf-16 string to a Windows function (#CristiFati's answer))
Although this targets a very specific area, it was not mentioned in any of the previous answers
The Linux (Ubuntu ([Wikipedia]: Ubuntu version history) 16 x86_64 (pc064)) counterpart as well:
Python 3.5.2 (default, Nov 17 2016, 17:05:23)
[GCC 5.4.0 20160609] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import ctypes as cts, os
>>> cts.CDLL("/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6").access(b"/tmp", os.F_OK)
0
>>> cts.CDLL("/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6").access(b"/tmp.notexist", os.F_OK)
-1
Notes:
Instead hardcoding libc.so (LibC)'s path ("/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6") which may (and most likely, will) vary across systems, None (or the empty string) can be passed to CDLL constructor (ctypes.CDLL(None).access(b"/tmp", os.F_OK)). According to [Man7]: DLOPEN(3):
If filename is NULL, then the returned handle is for the main
program. When given to dlsym(3), this handle causes a search for a
symbol in the main program, followed by all shared objects loaded at
program startup, and then all shared objects loaded by dlopen() with
the flag RTLD_GLOBAL.
Main (current) program (python) is linked against LibC, so its symbols (including access) will be loaded
This has to be handled with care, since functions like main, Py_Main and (all the) others are available; calling them could have disastrous effects (on the current program)
This doesn't also apply to Windows (but that's not such a big deal, since UCRT is located in "%SystemRoot%\System32" which is in %PATH% by default). I wanted to take things further and replicate this behavior on Windows (and submit a patch), but as it turns out, [MS.Learn]: GetProcAddress function (libloaderapi.h) only "sees" exported symbols, so unless someone declares the functions in the main executable as __declspec(dllexport) (why on Earth the common person would do that?), the main program is loadable, but it is pretty much unusable
5. 3rd-party modules with filesystem capabilities
Most likely, will rely on one of the ways above (maybe with slight customizations). One example would be (again, Win specific) [GitHub]: mhammond/pywin32 - Python for Windows (pywin32) Extensions, which is a Python wrapper over WinAPIs.
But, since this is more like a workaround, I'm stopping here.
6. SysAdmin approach
I consider this a (lame) workaround (gainarie): use Python as a wrapper to execute shell commands:
Win:
(py35x64_test) [cfati#CFATI-5510-0:e:\Work\Dev\StackOverflow\q000082831]> "e:\Work\Dev\VEnvs\py35x64_test\Scripts\python.exe" -c "import os; print(os.system('dir /b \"C:\\Windows\\Temp\" > nul 2>&1'))"
0
(py35x64_test) [cfati#CFATI-5510-0:e:\Work\Dev\StackOverflow\q000082831]> "e:\Work\Dev\VEnvs\py35x64_test\Scripts\python.exe" -c "import os; print(os.system('dir /b \"C:\\Windows\\Temp.notexist\" > nul 2>&1'))"
1
Nix ([Wikipedia]: Unix-like) - Ubuntu:
[cfati#cfati-5510-0:/mnt/e/Work/Dev/StackOverflow/q000082831]> python3 -c "import os; print(os.system('ls \"/tmp\" > /dev/null 2>&1'))"
0
[cfati#cfati-5510-0:/mnt/e/Work/Dev/StackOverflow/q000082831]> python3 -c "import os; print(os.system('ls \"/tmp.notexist\" > /dev/null 2>&1'))"
512
Bottom line:
Do use try / except / else / finally blocks, because they can prevent you running into a series of nasty problems
A possible counterexample that I can think of, is performance: such blocks are costly, so try not to place them in code that it's supposed to run hundreds of thousands times per second (but since (in most cases) it involves disk access, it won't be the case)

Python 3.4+ has an object-oriented path module: pathlib. Using this new module, you can check whether a file exists like this:
import pathlib
p = pathlib.Path('path/to/file')
if p.is_file(): # or p.is_dir() to see if it is a directory
# do stuff
You can (and usually should) still use a try/except block when opening files:
try:
with p.open() as f:
# do awesome stuff
except OSError:
print('Well darn.')
The pathlib module has lots of cool stuff in it: convenient globbing, checking file's owner, easier path joining, etc. It's worth checking out. If you're on an older Python (version 2.6 or later), you can still install pathlib with pip:
# installs pathlib2 on older Python versions
# the original third-party module, pathlib, is no longer maintained.
pip install pathlib2
Then import it as follows:
# Older Python versions
import pathlib2 as pathlib

This is the simplest way to check if a file exists. Just because the file existed when you checked doesn't guarantee that it will be there when you need to open it.
import os
fname = "foo.txt"
if os.path.isfile(fname):
print("file does exist at this time")
else:
print("no such file exists at this time")

How do I check whether a file exists, using Python, without using a try statement?
Now available since Python 3.4, import and instantiate a Path object with the file name, and check the is_file method (note that this returns True for symlinks pointing to regular files as well):
>>> from pathlib import Path
>>> Path('/').is_file()
False
>>> Path('/initrd.img').is_file()
True
>>> Path('/doesnotexist').is_file()
False
If you're on Python 2, you can backport the pathlib module from pypi, pathlib2, or otherwise check isfile from the os.path module:
>>> import os
>>> os.path.isfile('/')
False
>>> os.path.isfile('/initrd.img')
True
>>> os.path.isfile('/doesnotexist')
False
Now the above is probably the best pragmatic direct answer here, but there's the possibility of a race condition (depending on what you're trying to accomplish), and the fact that the underlying implementation uses a try, but Python uses try everywhere in its implementation.
Because Python uses try everywhere, there's really no reason to avoid an implementation that uses it.
But the rest of this answer attempts to consider these caveats.
Longer, much more pedantic answer
Available since Python 3.4, use the new Path object in pathlib. Note that .exists is not quite right, because directories are not files (except in the unix sense that everything is a file).
>>> from pathlib import Path
>>> root = Path('/')
>>> root.exists()
True
So we need to use is_file:
>>> root.is_file()
False
Here's the help on is_file:
is_file(self)
Whether this path is a regular file (also True for symlinks pointing
to regular files).
So let's get a file that we know is a file:
>>> import tempfile
>>> file = tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile()
>>> filepathobj = Path(file.name)
>>> filepathobj.is_file()
True
>>> filepathobj.exists()
True
By default, NamedTemporaryFile deletes the file when closed (and will automatically close when no more references exist to it).
>>> del file
>>> filepathobj.exists()
False
>>> filepathobj.is_file()
False
If you dig into the implementation, though, you'll see that is_file uses try:
def is_file(self):
"""
Whether this path is a regular file (also True for symlinks pointing
to regular files).
"""
try:
return S_ISREG(self.stat().st_mode)
except OSError as e:
if e.errno not in (ENOENT, ENOTDIR):
raise
# Path doesn't exist or is a broken symlink
# (see https://bitbucket.org/pitrou/pathlib/issue/12/)
return False
Race Conditions: Why we like try
We like try because it avoids race conditions. With try, you simply attempt to read your file, expecting it to be there, and if not, you catch the exception and perform whatever fallback behavior makes sense.
If you want to check that a file exists before you attempt to read it, and you might be deleting it and then you might be using multiple threads or processes, or another program knows about that file and could delete it - you risk the chance of a race condition if you check it exists, because you are then racing to open it before its condition (its existence) changes.
Race conditions are very hard to debug because there's a very small window in which they can cause your program to fail.
But if this is your motivation, you can get the value of a try statement by using the suppress context manager.
Avoiding race conditions without a try statement: suppress
Python 3.4 gives us the suppress context manager (previously the ignore context manager), which does semantically exactly the same thing in fewer lines, while also (at least superficially) meeting the original ask to avoid a try statement:
from contextlib import suppress
from pathlib import Path
Usage:
>>> with suppress(OSError), Path('doesnotexist').open() as f:
... for line in f:
... print(line)
...
>>>
>>> with suppress(OSError):
... Path('doesnotexist').unlink()
...
>>>
For earlier Pythons, you could roll your own suppress, but without a try will be more verbose than with. I do believe this actually is the only answer that doesn't use try at any level in the Python that can be applied to prior to Python 3.4 because it uses a context manager instead:
class suppress(object):
def __init__(self, *exceptions):
self.exceptions = exceptions
def __enter__(self):
return self
def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_value, traceback):
if exc_type is not None:
return issubclass(exc_type, self.exceptions)
Perhaps easier with a try:
from contextlib import contextmanager
#contextmanager
def suppress(*exceptions):
try:
yield
except exceptions:
pass
Other options that don't meet the ask for "without try":
isfile
import os
os.path.isfile(path)
from the docs:
os.path.isfile(path)
Return True if path is an existing regular file. This follows symbolic
links, so both islink() and isfile() can be true for the same path.
But if you examine the source of this function, you'll see it actually does use a try statement:
# This follows symbolic links, so both islink() and isdir() can be true
# for the same path on systems that support symlinks
def isfile(path):
"""Test whether a path is a regular file"""
try:
st = os.stat(path)
except os.error:
return False
return stat.S_ISREG(st.st_mode)
>>> OSError is os.error
True
All it's doing is using the given path to see if it can get stats on it, catching OSError and then checking if it's a file if it didn't raise the exception.
If you intend to do something with the file, I would suggest directly attempting it with a try-except to avoid a race condition:
try:
with open(path) as f:
f.read()
except OSError:
pass
os.access
Available for Unix and Windows is os.access, but to use you must pass flags, and it does not differentiate between files and directories. This is more used to test if the real invoking user has access in an elevated privilege environment:
import os
os.access(path, os.F_OK)
It also suffers from the same race condition problems as isfile. From the docs:
Note:
Using access() to check if a user is authorized to e.g. open a file
before actually doing so using open() creates a security hole, because
the user might exploit the short time interval between checking and
opening the file to manipulate it. It’s preferable to use EAFP
techniques. For example:
if os.access("myfile", os.R_OK):
with open("myfile") as fp:
return fp.read()
return "some default data"
is better written as:
try:
fp = open("myfile")
except IOError as e:
if e.errno == errno.EACCES:
return "some default data"
# Not a permission error.
raise
else:
with fp:
return fp.read()
Avoid using os.access. It is a low level function that has more opportunities for user error than the higher level objects and functions discussed above.
Criticism of another answer:
Another answer says this about os.access:
Personally, I prefer this one because under the hood, it calls native APIs (via "${PYTHON_SRC_DIR}/Modules/posixmodule.c"), but it also opens a gate for possible user errors, and it's not as Pythonic as other variants:
This answer says it prefers a non-Pythonic, error-prone method, with no justification. It seems to encourage users to use low-level APIs without understanding them.
It also creates a context manager which, by unconditionally returning True, allows all Exceptions (including KeyboardInterrupt and SystemExit!) to pass silently, which is a good way to hide bugs.
This seems to encourage users to adopt poor practices.

Prefer the try statement. It's considered better style and avoids race conditions.
Don't take my word for it. There's plenty of support for this theory. Here's a couple:
Style: Section "Handling unusual conditions" of these course notes for Software Design (2007)
Avoiding Race Conditions

Use:
import os
#Your path here e.g. "C:\Program Files\text.txt"
#For access purposes: "C:\\Program Files\\text.txt"
if os.path.exists("C:\..."):
print "File found!"
else:
print "File not found!"
Importing os makes it easier to navigate and perform standard actions with your operating system.
For reference, also see How do I check whether a file exists without exceptions?.
If you need high-level operations, use shutil.

Testing for files and folders with os.path.isfile(), os.path.isdir() and os.path.exists()
Assuming that the "path" is a valid path, this table shows what is returned by each function for files and folders:
You can also test if a file is a certain type of file using os.path.splitext() to get the extension (if you don't already know it)
>>> import os
>>> path = "path to a word document"
>>> os.path.isfile(path)
True
>>> os.path.splitext(path)[1] == ".docx" # test if the extension is .docx
True

TL;DR
The answer is: use the pathlib module
Pathlib is probably the most modern and convenient way for almost all of the file operations. For the existence of a file or a folder a single line of code is enough. If file is not exists, it will not throw any exception.
from pathlib import Path
if Path("myfile.txt").exists(): # works for both file and folders
# do your cool stuff...
The pathlib module was introduced in Python 3.4, so you need to have Python 3.4+. This library makes your life much easier while working with files and folders, and it is pretty to use. Here is more documentation about it: pathlib — Object-oriented filesystem paths.
BTW, if you are going to reuse the path, then it is better to assign it to a variable.
So it will become:
from pathlib import Path
p = Path("loc/of/myfile.txt")
if p.exists(): # works for both file and folders
# do stuffs...
#reuse 'p' if needed.

In 2016 the best way is still using os.path.isfile:
>>> os.path.isfile('/path/to/some/file.txt')
Or in Python 3 you can use pathlib:
import pathlib
path = pathlib.Path('/path/to/some/file.txt')
if path.is_file():
...

It doesn't seem like there's a meaningful functional difference between try/except and isfile(), so you should use which one makes sense.
If you want to read a file, if it exists, do
try:
f = open(filepath)
except IOError:
print 'Oh dear.'
But if you just wanted to rename a file if it exists, and therefore don't need to open it, do
if os.path.isfile(filepath):
os.rename(filepath, filepath + '.old')
If you want to write to a file, if it doesn't exist, do
# Python 2
if not os.path.isfile(filepath):
f = open(filepath, 'w')
# Python 3: x opens for exclusive creation, failing if the file already exists
try:
f = open(filepath, 'wx')
except IOError:
print 'file already exists'
If you need file locking, that's a different matter.

You could try this (safer):
try:
# http://effbot.org/zone/python-with-statement.htm
# 'with' is safer to open a file
with open('whatever.txt') as fh:
# Do something with 'fh'
except IOError as e:
print("({})".format(e))
The ouput would be:
([Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'whatever.txt')
Then, depending on the result, your program can just keep running from there or you can code to stop it if you want.

Date: 2017-12-04
Every possible solution has been listed in other answers.
An intuitive and arguable way to check if a file exists is the following:
import os
os.path.isfile('~/file.md') # Returns True if exists, else False
# Additionally, check a directory
os.path.isdir('~/folder') # Returns True if the folder exists, else False
# Check either a directory or a file
os.path.exists('~/file')
I made an exhaustive cheat sheet for your reference:
# os.path methods in exhaustive cheat sheet
{'definition': ['dirname',
'basename',
'abspath',
'relpath',
'commonpath',
'normpath',
'realpath'],
'operation': ['split', 'splitdrive', 'splitext',
'join', 'normcase'],
'compare': ['samefile', 'sameopenfile', 'samestat'],
'condition': ['isdir',
'isfile',
'exists',
'lexists'
'islink',
'isabs',
'ismount',],
'expand': ['expanduser',
'expandvars'],
'stat': ['getatime', 'getctime', 'getmtime',
'getsize']}

Although I always recommend using try and except statements, here are a few possibilities for you (my personal favourite is using os.access):
Try opening the file:
Opening the file will always verify the existence of the file. You can make a function just like so:
def File_Existence(filepath):
f = open(filepath)
return True
If it's False, it will stop execution with an unhanded IOError
or OSError in later versions of Python. To catch the exception,
you have to use a try except clause. Of course, you can always
use a try except` statement like so (thanks to hsandt
for making me think):
def File_Existence(filepath):
try:
f = open(filepath)
except IOError, OSError: # Note OSError is for later versions of Python
return False
return True
Use os.path.exists(path):
This will check the existence of what you specify. However, it checks for files and directories so beware about how you use it.
import os.path
>>> os.path.exists("this/is/a/directory")
True
>>> os.path.exists("this/is/a/file.txt")
True
>>> os.path.exists("not/a/directory")
False
Use os.access(path, mode):
This will check whether you have access to the file. It will check for permissions. Based on the os.py documentation, typing in os.F_OK, it will check the existence of the path. However, using this will create a security hole, as someone can attack your file using the time between checking the permissions and opening the file. You should instead go directly to opening the file instead of checking its permissions. (EAFP vs LBYP). If you're not going to open the file afterwards, and only checking its existence, then you can use this.
Anyway, here:
>>> import os
>>> os.access("/is/a/file.txt", os.F_OK)
True
I should also mention that there are two ways that you will not be able to verify the existence of a file. Either the issue will be permission denied or no such file or directory. If you catch an IOError, set the IOError as e (like my first option), and then type in print(e.args) so that you can hopefully determine your issue. I hope it helps! :)

If the file is for opening you could use one of the following techniques:
with open('somefile', 'xt') as f: # Using the x-flag, Python 3.3 and above
f.write('Hello\n')
if not os.path.exists('somefile'):
with open('somefile', 'wt') as f:
f.write("Hello\n")
else:
print('File already exists!')
Note: This finds either a file or a directory with the given name.

Additionally, os.access():
if os.access("myfile", os.R_OK):
with open("myfile") as fp:
return fp.read()
Being R_OK, W_OK, and X_OK the flags to test for permissions (doc).

if os.path.isfile(path_to_file):
try:
open(path_to_file)
pass
except IOError as e:
print "Unable to open file"
Raising exceptions is considered to be an acceptable, and Pythonic,
approach for flow control in your program. Consider handling missing
files with IOErrors. In this situation, an IOError exception will be
raised if the file exists but the user does not have read permissions.
Source: Using Python: How To Check If A File Exists

If you imported NumPy already for other purposes then there is no need to import other libraries like pathlib, os, paths, etc.
import numpy as np
np.DataSource().exists("path/to/your/file")
This will return true or false based on its existence.

Check file or directory exists
You can follow these three ways:
1. Using isfile()
Note 1: The os.path.isfile used only for files
import os.path
os.path.isfile(filename) # True if file exists
os.path.isfile(dirname) # False if directory exists
2. Using exists
Note 2: The os.path.exists is used for both files and directories
import os.path
os.path.exists(filename) # True if file exists
os.path.exists(dirname) # True if directory exists
3. The pathlib.Path method (included in Python 3+, installable with pip for Python 2)
from pathlib import Path
Path(filename).exists()

You can write Brian's suggestion without the try:.
from contextlib import suppress
with suppress(IOError), open('filename'):
process()
suppress is part of Python 3.4. In older releases you can quickly write your own suppress:
from contextlib import contextmanager
#contextmanager
def suppress(*exceptions):
try:
yield
except exceptions:
pass

I'm the author of a package that's been around for about 10 years, and it has a function that addresses this question directly. Basically, if you are on a non-Windows system, it uses Popen to access find. However, if you are on Windows, it replicates find with an efficient filesystem walker.
The code itself does not use a try block… except in determining the operating system and thus steering you to the "Unix"-style find or the hand-buillt find. Timing tests showed that the try was faster in determining the OS, so I did use one there (but nowhere else).
>>> import pox
>>> pox.find('*python*', type='file', root=pox.homedir(), recurse=False)
['/Users/mmckerns/.python']
And the doc…
>>> print pox.find.__doc__
find(patterns[,root,recurse,type]); Get path to a file or directory
patterns: name or partial name string of items to search for
root: path string of top-level directory to search
recurse: if True, recurse down from root directory
type: item filter; one of {None, file, dir, link, socket, block, char}
verbose: if True, be a little verbose about the search
On some OS, recursion can be specified by recursion depth (an integer).
patterns can be specified with basic pattern matching. Additionally,
multiple patterns can be specified by splitting patterns with a ';'
For example:
>>> find('pox*', root='..')
['/Users/foo/pox/pox', '/Users/foo/pox/scripts/pox_launcher.py']
>>> find('*shutils*;*init*')
['/Users/foo/pox/pox/shutils.py', '/Users/foo/pox/pox/__init__.py']
>>>
The implementation, if you care to look, is here:
https://github.com/uqfoundation/pox/blob/89f90fb308f285ca7a62eabe2c38acb87e89dad9/pox/shutils.py#L190

Adding one more slight variation which isn't exactly reflected in the other answers.
This will handle the case of the file_path being None or empty string.
def file_exists(file_path):
if not file_path:
return False
elif not os.path.isfile(file_path):
return False
else:
return True
Adding a variant based on suggestion from Shahbaz
def file_exists(file_path):
if not file_path:
return False
else:
return os.path.isfile(file_path)
Adding a variant based on suggestion from Peter Wood
def file_exists(file_path):
return file_path and os.path.isfile(file_path):

Here's a one-line Python command for the Linux command line environment. I find this very handy since I'm not such a hot Bash guy.
python -c "import os.path; print os.path.isfile('/path_to/file.xxx')"

You can use the "OS" library of Python:
>>> import os
>>> os.path.exists("C:\\Users\\####\\Desktop\\test.txt")
True
>>> os.path.exists("C:\\Users\\####\\Desktop\\test.tx")
False

How do I check whether a file exists, without using the try statement?
In 2016, this is still arguably the easiest way to check if both a file exists and if it is a file:
import os
os.path.isfile('./file.txt') # Returns True if exists, else False
isfile is actually just a helper method that internally uses os.stat and stat.S_ISREG(mode) underneath. This os.stat is a lower-level method that will provide you with detailed information about files, directories, sockets, buffers, and more. More about os.stat here
Note: However, this approach will not lock the file in any way and therefore your code can become vulnerable to "time of check to time of use" (TOCTTOU) bugs.
So raising exceptions is considered to be an acceptable, and Pythonic, approach for flow control in your program. And one should consider handling missing files with IOErrors, rather than if statements (just an advice).

Tab-completion in Python interpreter in OS X Terminal

Several months ago, I wrote a blog post detailing how to achieve tab-completion in the standard Python interactive interpreter--a feature I once thought only available in IPython. I've found it tremendously handy given that I sometimes have to switch to the standard interpreter due to IPython unicode issues.
Recently I've done some work in OS X. To my discontent, the script doesn't seem to work for OS X's Terminal application. I'm hoping some of you with experience in OS X might be able to help me trouble-shoot it so it can work in Terminal, as well.
I am reproducing the code below
import atexit
import os.path
try:
import readline
except ImportError:
pass
else:
import rlcompleter
class IrlCompleter(rlcompleter.Completer):
"""
This class enables a "tab" insertion if there's no text for
completion.
The default "tab" is four spaces. You can initialize with '\t' as
the tab if you wish to use a genuine tab.
"""
def __init__(self, tab=' '):
self.tab = tab
rlcompleter.Completer.__init__(self)
def complete(self, text, state):
if text == '':
readline.insert_text(self.tab)
return None
else:
return rlcompleter.Completer.complete(self,text,state)
#you could change this line to bind another key instead tab.
readline.parse_and_bind('tab: complete')
readline.set_completer(IrlCompleter('\t').complete)
# Restore our command-line history, and save it when Python exits.
history_path = os.path.expanduser('~/.pyhistory')
if os.path.isfile(history_path):
readline.read_history_file(history_path)
atexit.register(lambda x=history_path: readline.write_history_file(x))
Note that I have slightly edited it from the version on my blog post so that the IrlCompleter is initialized with a true tab, which seems to be what is output by the Tab key in Terminal.

This should work under Leopard's python:
import rlcompleter
import readline
readline.parse_and_bind ("bind ^I rl_complete")
Whereas this one does not:
import readline, rlcompleter
readline.parse_and_bind("tab: complete")
Save it in ~/.pythonrc.py and execute in .bash_profile
export PYTHONSTARTUP=$HOME/.pythonrc.py

here is a full cross platform version of loading tab completion for Windows/OS X/Linux in one shot:
#Code UUID = '9301d536-860d-11de-81c8-0023dfaa9e40'
import sys
try:
import readline
except ImportError:
try:
import pyreadline as readline
# throw open a browser if we fail both readline and pyreadline
except ImportError:
import webbrowser
webbrowser.open("http://ipython.scipy.org/moin/PyReadline/Intro#line-36")
# throw open a browser
#pass
else:
import rlcompleter
if(sys.platform == 'darwin'):
readline.parse_and_bind ("bind ^I rl_complete")
else:
readline.parse_and_bind("tab: complete")
From http://www.farmckon.net/?p=181

To avoid having to use more GPL code, Apple doesn't include a real readline. Instead it uses the BSD-licensed libedit, which is only mostly-readline-compatible. Build your own Python (or use Fink or MacPorts) if you want completion.

This works for me on both Linux bash and OS X 10.4
import readline
import rlcompleter
readline.parse_and_bind('tab: complete')

If after trying the above, it still doesn't work, then try to execute in the shell:
sudo easy_install readline
Then, create ~/.profile file with the content:
export PYTHONSTARTUP=$HOME/.pythonrc.py
and a ~/.pythonrc.py file with the content:
try:
import readline
except:
print ("Module readline is not available.")
else:
import rlcompleter
readline.parse_and_bind("tab: complete")
Thanks to Steven Bamford for the easy_install tip, and Nicolas for the file content.

The documented way to tell libedit (the Mac OS semi-readline) from the real one is:
if "libedit" in readline.doc:
pass # Mac case
else:
pass # GNU readline case

After crashing into many issues dealing with Python (2 and 3) on FreeBSD, I finally got a proper extension to work using libedit directly as the completer for Python.
The basic issue with libedit/readline is that Python's completion and input was heavily bent towards GNU readline... Sadly, this is actually not a particularly good interface. It requires a giant number of globals in C and does not work well on an "instance" basis.
Solution:
https://github.com/mark-nicholson/python-editline
This is a true separate python extension which directly links to libedit using the actual "libedit" interface -- not the readline glue on the side.
I have tested it pretty thoroughly on Ubuntu, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD and MacOS -- results are posted in the readme. The c-code is very clean and has virtually no platform dependent bits -- unlike the readline.c module in Python.
Notes:
It works on Python3 > 3.2.
It is NOT a drop-in replacement for 'import readline' in other scripts, but those scripts can be adjusted easily.
It can co-exist with readline.so -- there is code for a sitecustomize.py file which enables the selection.
It can use a distribution 'libedit.so', a custom built one or libedit built into the extension itself.

Use Python 2.6 subprocess module in Python 2.5

I would like to use Python 2.6's version of subprocess, because it allows the Popen.terminate() function, but I'm stuck with Python 2.5. Is there some reasonably clean way to use the newer version of the module in my 2.5 code? Some sort of from __future__ import subprocess_module?

I know this question has already been answered, but for what it's worth, I've used the subprocess.py that ships with Python 2.6 in Python 2.3 and it's worked fine. If you read the comments at the top of the file it says:
# This module should remain compatible with Python 2.2, see PEP 291.

There isn't really a great way to do it. subprocess is implemented in python (as opposed to C) so you could conceivably copy the module somewhere and use it (hoping of course that it doesn't use any 2.6 goodness).
On the other hand you could simply implement what subprocess claims to do and write a function that sends SIGTERM on *nix and calls TerminateProcess on Windows. The following implementation has been tested on linux and in a Win XP vm, you'll need the python Windows extensions:
import sys
def terminate(process):
"""
Kills a process, useful on 2.5 where subprocess.Popens don't have a
terminate method.
Used here because we're stuck on 2.5 and don't have Popen.terminate
goodness.
"""
def terminate_win(process):
import win32process
return win32process.TerminateProcess(process._handle, -1)
def terminate_nix(process):
import os
import signal
return os.kill(process.pid, signal.SIGTERM)
terminate_default = terminate_nix
handlers = {
"win32": terminate_win,
"linux2": terminate_nix
}
return handlers.get(sys.platform, terminate_default)(process)
That way you only have to maintain the terminate code rather than the entire module.

While this doesn't directly answer your question, it may be worth knowing.
Imports from __future__ actually only change compiler options, so while it can turn with into a statement or make string literals produce unicodes instead of strs, it can't change the capabilities and features of modules in the Python standard library.

I followed Kamil Kisiel suggestion regarding using python 2.6 subprocess.py in python 2.5 and it worked perfectly. To make it easier, I created a distutils package that you can easy_install and/or include in buildout.
To use subprocess from python 2.6 in python 2.5 project:
easy_install taras.python26
in your code
from taras.python26 import subprocess
in buildout
[buildout]
parts = subprocess26
[subprocess26]
recipe = zc.recipe.egg
eggs = taras.python26

Here are some ways to end processes on Windows, taken directly from
http://code.activestate.com/recipes/347462/
# Create a process that won't end on its own
import subprocess
process = subprocess.Popen(['python.exe', '-c', 'while 1: pass'])
# Kill the process using pywin32
import win32api
win32api.TerminateProcess(int(process._handle), -1)
# Kill the process using ctypes
import ctypes
ctypes.windll.kernel32.TerminateProcess(int(process._handle), -1)
# Kill the proces using pywin32 and pid
import win32api
PROCESS_TERMINATE = 1
handle = win32api.OpenProcess(PROCESS_TERMINATE, False, process.pid)
win32api.TerminateProcess(handle, -1)
win32api.CloseHandle(handle)
# Kill the proces using ctypes and pid
import ctypes
PROCESS_TERMINATE = 1
handle = ctypes.windll.kernel32.OpenProcess(PROCESS_TERMINATE, False, process.pid)
ctypes.windll.kernel32.TerminateProcess(handle, -1)
ctypes.windll.kernel32.CloseHandle(handle)

Well Python is open source, you are free to take that pthread function from 2.6 and move it into your own code or use it as a reference to implement your own.
For reasons that should be obvious there's no way to have a hybrid of Python that can import portions of newer versions.

How do I check whether a file exists without exceptions?

How do I check whether a file exists or not, without using the try statement?

If the reason you're checking is so you can do something like if file_exists: open_it(), it's safer to use a try around the attempt to open it. Checking and then opening risks the file being deleted or moved or something between when you check and when you try to open it.
If you're not planning to open the file immediately, you can use os.path.isfile
Return True if path is an existing regular file. This follows symbolic links, so both islink() and isfile() can be true for the same path.
import os.path
os.path.isfile(fname)
if you need to be sure it's a file.
Starting with Python 3.4, the pathlib module offers an object-oriented approach (backported to pathlib2 in Python 2.7):
from pathlib import Path
my_file = Path("/path/to/file")
if my_file.is_file():
# file exists
To check a directory, do:
if my_file.is_dir():
# directory exists
To check whether a Path object exists independently of whether is it a file or directory, use exists():
if my_file.exists():
# path exists
You can also use resolve(strict=True) in a try block:
try:
my_abs_path = my_file.resolve(strict=True)
except FileNotFoundError:
# doesn't exist
else:
# exists

Use os.path.exists to check both files and directories:
import os.path
os.path.exists(file_path)
Use os.path.isfile to check only files (note: follows symbolic links):
os.path.isfile(file_path)

Unlike isfile(), exists() will return True for directories. So depending on if you want only plain files or also directories, you'll use isfile() or exists(). Here is some simple REPL output:
>>> os.path.isfile("/etc/password.txt")
True
>>> os.path.isfile("/etc")
False
>>> os.path.isfile("/does/not/exist")
False
>>> os.path.exists("/etc/password.txt")
True
>>> os.path.exists("/etc")
True
>>> os.path.exists("/does/not/exist")
False

import os
if os.path.isfile(filepath):
print("File exists")

Use os.path.isfile() with os.access():
import os
PATH = './file.txt'
if os.path.isfile(PATH) and os.access(PATH, os.R_OK):
print("File exists and is readable")
else:
print("Either the file is missing or not readable")

import os
os.path.exists(path) # Returns whether the path (directory or file) exists or not
os.path.isfile(path) # Returns whether the file exists or not

Although almost every possible way has been listed in (at least one of) the existing answers (e.g. Python 3.4 specific stuff was added), I'll try to group everything together.
Note: every piece of Python standard library code that I'm going to post, belongs to version 3.5.3.
Problem statement:
Check file (arguable: also folder ("special" file) ?) existence
Don't use try / except / else / finally blocks
Possible solutions:
1. [Python.Docs]: os.path.exists(path)
Also check other function family members like os.path.isfile, os.path.isdir, os.path.lexists for slightly different behaviors:
Return True if path refers to an existing path or an open file descriptor. Returns False for broken symbolic links. On some platforms, this function may return False if permission is not granted to execute os.stat() on the requested file, even if the path physically exists.
All good, but if following the import tree:
os.path - posixpath.py (ntpath.py)
genericpath.py - line ~20+
def exists(path):
"""Test whether a path exists. Returns False for broken symbolic links"""
try:
st = os.stat(path)
except os.error:
return False
return True
it's just a try / except block around [Python.Docs]: os.stat(path, *, dir_fd=None, follow_symlinks=True). So, your code is try / except free, but lower in the framestack there's (at least) one such block. This also applies to other functions (including os.path.isfile).
1.1. [Python.Docs]: pathlib - Path.is_file()
It's a fancier (and more [Wiktionary]: Pythonic) way of handling paths, but
Under the hood, it does exactly the same thing (pathlib.py - line ~1330):
def is_file(self):
"""
Whether this path is a regular file (also True for symlinks pointing
to regular files).
"""
try:
return S_ISREG(self.stat().st_mode)
except OSError as e:
if e.errno not in (ENOENT, ENOTDIR):
raise
# Path doesn't exist or is a broken symlink
# (see https://bitbucket.org/pitrou/pathlib/issue/12/)
return False
2. [Python.Docs]: With Statement Context Managers
Either:
Create one:
class Swallow: # Dummy example
swallowed_exceptions = (FileNotFoundError,)
def __enter__(self):
print("Entering...")
def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_value, exc_traceback):
print("Exiting:", exc_type, exc_value, exc_traceback)
# Only swallow FileNotFoundError (not e.g. TypeError - if the user passes a wrong argument like None or float or ...)
return exc_type in Swallow.swallowed_exceptions
And its usage - I'll replicate the os.path.isfile behavior (note that this is just for demonstrating purposes, do not attempt to write such code for production):
import os
import stat
def isfile_seaman(path): # Dummy func
result = False
with Swallow():
result = stat.S_ISREG(os.stat(path).st_mode)
return result
Use [Python.Docs]: contextlib.suppress(*exceptions) - which was specifically designed for selectively suppressing exceptions
But, they seem to be wrappers over try / except / else / finally blocks, as [Python.Docs]: Compound statements - The with statement states:
This allows common try...except...finally usage patterns to be encapsulated for convenient reuse.
3. Filesystem traversal functions
Search the results for matching item(s):
[Python.Docs]: os.listdir(path='.') (or [Python.Docs]: os.scandir(path='.') on Python v3.5+, backport: [PyPI]: scandir)
Under the hood, both use:
Nix: [Man7]: OPENDIR(3) / [Man7]: READDIR(3) / [Man7]: CLOSEDIR(3)
Win: [MS.Learn]: FindFirstFileW function (fileapi.h) / [MS.Learn]: FindNextFileW function (fileapi.h) / [MS.Learn]: FindClose function (fileapi.h)
via [GitHub]: python/cpython - (main) cpython/Modules/posixmodule.c
Using scandir() instead of listdir() can significantly increase the performance of code that also needs file type or file attribute information, because os.DirEntry objects expose this information if the operating system provides it when scanning a directory. All os.DirEntry methods may perform a system call, but is_dir() and is_file() usually only require a system call for symbolic links; os.DirEntry.stat() always requires a system call on Unix, but only requires one for symbolic links on Windows.
[Python.Docs]: os.walk(top, topdown=True, onerror=None, followlinks=False)
Uses os.listdir (os.scandir when available)
[Python.Docs]: glob.iglob(pathname, *, root_dir=None, dir_fd=None, recursive=False, include_hidden=False) (or its predecessor: glob.glob)
Doesn't seem a traversing function per se (at least in some cases), but it still uses os.listdir
Since these iterate over folders, (in most of the cases) they are inefficient for our problem (there are exceptions, like non wildcarded globbing - as #ShadowRanger pointed out), so I'm not going to insist on them. Not to mention that in some cases, filename processing might be required.
4. [Python.Docs]: os.access(path, mode, *, dir_fd=None, effective_ids=False, follow_symlinks=True)
Its behavior is close to os.path.exists (actually it's wider, mainly because of the 2nd argument).
User permissions might restrict the file "visibility" as the doc states:
... test if the invoking user has the specified access to path. mode should be F_OK to test the existence of path...
Security considerations:
Using access() to check if a user is authorized to e.g. open a file before actually doing so using open() creates a security hole, because the user might exploit the short time interval between checking and opening the file to manipulate it.
os.access("/tmp", os.F_OK)
Since I also work in C, I use this method as well because under the hood, it calls native APIs (again, via "${PYTHON_SRC_DIR}/Modules/posixmodule.c"), but it also opens a gate for possible user errors, and it's not as Pythonic as other variants. So, don't use it unless you know what you're doing:
Nix: [Man7]: ACCESS(2)
Warning: Using these calls to check if a user is authorized to, for example, open a file before actually doing so using open(2) creates a security hole, because the user might exploit the short time interval between checking and opening the file to manipulate it. For this reason, the use of this system call should be avoided.
Win: [MS.Learn]: GetFileAttributesW function (fileapi.h)
As seen, this approach is highly discouraged (especially on Nix).
Note: calling native APIs is also possible via [Python.Docs]: ctypes - A foreign function library for Python, but in most cases it's more complicated. Before working with CTypes, check [SO]: C function called from Python via ctypes returns incorrect value (#CristiFati's answer) out.
(Win specific): since vcruntime###.dll (msvcr###.dll for older VStudio versions - I'm going to refer to it as UCRT) exports a [MS.Learn]: _access, _waccess function family as well, here's an example (note that the recommended [Python.Docs]: msvcrt - Useful routines from the MS VC++ runtime doesn't export them):
Python 3.5.3 (v3.5.3:1880cb95a742, Jan 16 2017, 16:02:32) [MSC v.1900 64 bit (AMD64)] on win32
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import ctypes as cts, os
>>> cts.CDLL("msvcrt")._waccess(u"C:\\Windows\\Temp", os.F_OK)
0
>>> cts.CDLL("msvcrt")._waccess(u"C:\\Windows\\Temp.notexist", os.F_OK)
-1
Notes:
Although it's not a good practice, I'm using os.F_OK in the call, but that's just for clarity (its value is 0)
I'm using _waccess so that the same code works on Python 3 and Python 2 (in spite of [Wikipedia]: Unicode related differences between them - [SO]: Passing utf-16 string to a Windows function (#CristiFati's answer))
Although this targets a very specific area, it was not mentioned in any of the previous answers
The Linux (Ubuntu ([Wikipedia]: Ubuntu version history) 16 x86_64 (pc064)) counterpart as well:
Python 3.5.2 (default, Nov 17 2016, 17:05:23)
[GCC 5.4.0 20160609] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import ctypes as cts, os
>>> cts.CDLL("/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6").access(b"/tmp", os.F_OK)
0
>>> cts.CDLL("/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6").access(b"/tmp.notexist", os.F_OK)
-1
Notes:
Instead hardcoding libc.so (LibC)'s path ("/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6") which may (and most likely, will) vary across systems, None (or the empty string) can be passed to CDLL constructor (ctypes.CDLL(None).access(b"/tmp", os.F_OK)). According to [Man7]: DLOPEN(3):
If filename is NULL, then the returned handle is for the main
program. When given to dlsym(3), this handle causes a search for a
symbol in the main program, followed by all shared objects loaded at
program startup, and then all shared objects loaded by dlopen() with
the flag RTLD_GLOBAL.
Main (current) program (python) is linked against LibC, so its symbols (including access) will be loaded
This has to be handled with care, since functions like main, Py_Main and (all the) others are available; calling them could have disastrous effects (on the current program)
This doesn't also apply to Windows (but that's not such a big deal, since UCRT is located in "%SystemRoot%\System32" which is in %PATH% by default). I wanted to take things further and replicate this behavior on Windows (and submit a patch), but as it turns out, [MS.Learn]: GetProcAddress function (libloaderapi.h) only "sees" exported symbols, so unless someone declares the functions in the main executable as __declspec(dllexport) (why on Earth the common person would do that?), the main program is loadable, but it is pretty much unusable
5. 3rd-party modules with filesystem capabilities
Most likely, will rely on one of the ways above (maybe with slight customizations). One example would be (again, Win specific) [GitHub]: mhammond/pywin32 - Python for Windows (pywin32) Extensions, which is a Python wrapper over WinAPIs.
But, since this is more like a workaround, I'm stopping here.
6. SysAdmin approach
I consider this a (lame) workaround (gainarie): use Python as a wrapper to execute shell commands:
Win:
(py35x64_test) [cfati#CFATI-5510-0:e:\Work\Dev\StackOverflow\q000082831]> "e:\Work\Dev\VEnvs\py35x64_test\Scripts\python.exe" -c "import os; print(os.system('dir /b \"C:\\Windows\\Temp\" > nul 2>&1'))"
0
(py35x64_test) [cfati#CFATI-5510-0:e:\Work\Dev\StackOverflow\q000082831]> "e:\Work\Dev\VEnvs\py35x64_test\Scripts\python.exe" -c "import os; print(os.system('dir /b \"C:\\Windows\\Temp.notexist\" > nul 2>&1'))"
1
Nix ([Wikipedia]: Unix-like) - Ubuntu:
[cfati#cfati-5510-0:/mnt/e/Work/Dev/StackOverflow/q000082831]> python3 -c "import os; print(os.system('ls \"/tmp\" > /dev/null 2>&1'))"
0
[cfati#cfati-5510-0:/mnt/e/Work/Dev/StackOverflow/q000082831]> python3 -c "import os; print(os.system('ls \"/tmp.notexist\" > /dev/null 2>&1'))"
512
Bottom line:
Do use try / except / else / finally blocks, because they can prevent you running into a series of nasty problems
A possible counterexample that I can think of, is performance: such blocks are costly, so try not to place them in code that it's supposed to run hundreds of thousands times per second (but since (in most cases) it involves disk access, it won't be the case)

Python 3.4+ has an object-oriented path module: pathlib. Using this new module, you can check whether a file exists like this:
import pathlib
p = pathlib.Path('path/to/file')
if p.is_file(): # or p.is_dir() to see if it is a directory
# do stuff
You can (and usually should) still use a try/except block when opening files:
try:
with p.open() as f:
# do awesome stuff
except OSError:
print('Well darn.')
The pathlib module has lots of cool stuff in it: convenient globbing, checking file's owner, easier path joining, etc. It's worth checking out. If you're on an older Python (version 2.6 or later), you can still install pathlib with pip:
# installs pathlib2 on older Python versions
# the original third-party module, pathlib, is no longer maintained.
pip install pathlib2
Then import it as follows:
# Older Python versions
import pathlib2 as pathlib

This is the simplest way to check if a file exists. Just because the file existed when you checked doesn't guarantee that it will be there when you need to open it.
import os
fname = "foo.txt"
if os.path.isfile(fname):
print("file does exist at this time")
else:
print("no such file exists at this time")

How do I check whether a file exists, using Python, without using a try statement?
Now available since Python 3.4, import and instantiate a Path object with the file name, and check the is_file method (note that this returns True for symlinks pointing to regular files as well):
>>> from pathlib import Path
>>> Path('/').is_file()
False
>>> Path('/initrd.img').is_file()
True
>>> Path('/doesnotexist').is_file()
False
If you're on Python 2, you can backport the pathlib module from pypi, pathlib2, or otherwise check isfile from the os.path module:
>>> import os
>>> os.path.isfile('/')
False
>>> os.path.isfile('/initrd.img')
True
>>> os.path.isfile('/doesnotexist')
False
Now the above is probably the best pragmatic direct answer here, but there's the possibility of a race condition (depending on what you're trying to accomplish), and the fact that the underlying implementation uses a try, but Python uses try everywhere in its implementation.
Because Python uses try everywhere, there's really no reason to avoid an implementation that uses it.
But the rest of this answer attempts to consider these caveats.
Longer, much more pedantic answer
Available since Python 3.4, use the new Path object in pathlib. Note that .exists is not quite right, because directories are not files (except in the unix sense that everything is a file).
>>> from pathlib import Path
>>> root = Path('/')
>>> root.exists()
True
So we need to use is_file:
>>> root.is_file()
False
Here's the help on is_file:
is_file(self)
Whether this path is a regular file (also True for symlinks pointing
to regular files).
So let's get a file that we know is a file:
>>> import tempfile
>>> file = tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile()
>>> filepathobj = Path(file.name)
>>> filepathobj.is_file()
True
>>> filepathobj.exists()
True
By default, NamedTemporaryFile deletes the file when closed (and will automatically close when no more references exist to it).
>>> del file
>>> filepathobj.exists()
False
>>> filepathobj.is_file()
False
If you dig into the implementation, though, you'll see that is_file uses try:
def is_file(self):
"""
Whether this path is a regular file (also True for symlinks pointing
to regular files).
"""
try:
return S_ISREG(self.stat().st_mode)
except OSError as e:
if e.errno not in (ENOENT, ENOTDIR):
raise
# Path doesn't exist or is a broken symlink
# (see https://bitbucket.org/pitrou/pathlib/issue/12/)
return False
Race Conditions: Why we like try
We like try because it avoids race conditions. With try, you simply attempt to read your file, expecting it to be there, and if not, you catch the exception and perform whatever fallback behavior makes sense.
If you want to check that a file exists before you attempt to read it, and you might be deleting it and then you might be using multiple threads or processes, or another program knows about that file and could delete it - you risk the chance of a race condition if you check it exists, because you are then racing to open it before its condition (its existence) changes.
Race conditions are very hard to debug because there's a very small window in which they can cause your program to fail.
But if this is your motivation, you can get the value of a try statement by using the suppress context manager.
Avoiding race conditions without a try statement: suppress
Python 3.4 gives us the suppress context manager (previously the ignore context manager), which does semantically exactly the same thing in fewer lines, while also (at least superficially) meeting the original ask to avoid a try statement:
from contextlib import suppress
from pathlib import Path
Usage:
>>> with suppress(OSError), Path('doesnotexist').open() as f:
... for line in f:
... print(line)
...
>>>
>>> with suppress(OSError):
... Path('doesnotexist').unlink()
...
>>>
For earlier Pythons, you could roll your own suppress, but without a try will be more verbose than with. I do believe this actually is the only answer that doesn't use try at any level in the Python that can be applied to prior to Python 3.4 because it uses a context manager instead:
class suppress(object):
def __init__(self, *exceptions):
self.exceptions = exceptions
def __enter__(self):
return self
def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_value, traceback):
if exc_type is not None:
return issubclass(exc_type, self.exceptions)
Perhaps easier with a try:
from contextlib import contextmanager
#contextmanager
def suppress(*exceptions):
try:
yield
except exceptions:
pass
Other options that don't meet the ask for "without try":
isfile
import os
os.path.isfile(path)
from the docs:
os.path.isfile(path)
Return True if path is an existing regular file. This follows symbolic
links, so both islink() and isfile() can be true for the same path.
But if you examine the source of this function, you'll see it actually does use a try statement:
# This follows symbolic links, so both islink() and isdir() can be true
# for the same path on systems that support symlinks
def isfile(path):
"""Test whether a path is a regular file"""
try:
st = os.stat(path)
except os.error:
return False
return stat.S_ISREG(st.st_mode)
>>> OSError is os.error
True
All it's doing is using the given path to see if it can get stats on it, catching OSError and then checking if it's a file if it didn't raise the exception.
If you intend to do something with the file, I would suggest directly attempting it with a try-except to avoid a race condition:
try:
with open(path) as f:
f.read()
except OSError:
pass
os.access
Available for Unix and Windows is os.access, but to use you must pass flags, and it does not differentiate between files and directories. This is more used to test if the real invoking user has access in an elevated privilege environment:
import os
os.access(path, os.F_OK)
It also suffers from the same race condition problems as isfile. From the docs:
Note:
Using access() to check if a user is authorized to e.g. open a file
before actually doing so using open() creates a security hole, because
the user might exploit the short time interval between checking and
opening the file to manipulate it. It’s preferable to use EAFP
techniques. For example:
if os.access("myfile", os.R_OK):
with open("myfile") as fp:
return fp.read()
return "some default data"
is better written as:
try:
fp = open("myfile")
except IOError as e:
if e.errno == errno.EACCES:
return "some default data"
# Not a permission error.
raise
else:
with fp:
return fp.read()
Avoid using os.access. It is a low level function that has more opportunities for user error than the higher level objects and functions discussed above.
Criticism of another answer:
Another answer says this about os.access:
Personally, I prefer this one because under the hood, it calls native APIs (via "${PYTHON_SRC_DIR}/Modules/posixmodule.c"), but it also opens a gate for possible user errors, and it's not as Pythonic as other variants:
This answer says it prefers a non-Pythonic, error-prone method, with no justification. It seems to encourage users to use low-level APIs without understanding them.
It also creates a context manager which, by unconditionally returning True, allows all Exceptions (including KeyboardInterrupt and SystemExit!) to pass silently, which is a good way to hide bugs.
This seems to encourage users to adopt poor practices.

Prefer the try statement. It's considered better style and avoids race conditions.
Don't take my word for it. There's plenty of support for this theory. Here's a couple:
Style: Section "Handling unusual conditions" of these course notes for Software Design (2007)
Avoiding Race Conditions

Use:
import os
#Your path here e.g. "C:\Program Files\text.txt"
#For access purposes: "C:\\Program Files\\text.txt"
if os.path.exists("C:\..."):
print "File found!"
else:
print "File not found!"
Importing os makes it easier to navigate and perform standard actions with your operating system.
For reference, also see How do I check whether a file exists without exceptions?.
If you need high-level operations, use shutil.

Testing for files and folders with os.path.isfile(), os.path.isdir() and os.path.exists()
Assuming that the "path" is a valid path, this table shows what is returned by each function for files and folders:
You can also test if a file is a certain type of file using os.path.splitext() to get the extension (if you don't already know it)
>>> import os
>>> path = "path to a word document"
>>> os.path.isfile(path)
True
>>> os.path.splitext(path)[1] == ".docx" # test if the extension is .docx
True

TL;DR
The answer is: use the pathlib module
Pathlib is probably the most modern and convenient way for almost all of the file operations. For the existence of a file or a folder a single line of code is enough. If file is not exists, it will not throw any exception.
from pathlib import Path
if Path("myfile.txt").exists(): # works for both file and folders
# do your cool stuff...
The pathlib module was introduced in Python 3.4, so you need to have Python 3.4+. This library makes your life much easier while working with files and folders, and it is pretty to use. Here is more documentation about it: pathlib — Object-oriented filesystem paths.
BTW, if you are going to reuse the path, then it is better to assign it to a variable.
So it will become:
from pathlib import Path
p = Path("loc/of/myfile.txt")
if p.exists(): # works for both file and folders
# do stuffs...
#reuse 'p' if needed.

In 2016 the best way is still using os.path.isfile:
>>> os.path.isfile('/path/to/some/file.txt')
Or in Python 3 you can use pathlib:
import pathlib
path = pathlib.Path('/path/to/some/file.txt')
if path.is_file():
...

It doesn't seem like there's a meaningful functional difference between try/except and isfile(), so you should use which one makes sense.
If you want to read a file, if it exists, do
try:
f = open(filepath)
except IOError:
print 'Oh dear.'
But if you just wanted to rename a file if it exists, and therefore don't need to open it, do
if os.path.isfile(filepath):
os.rename(filepath, filepath + '.old')
If you want to write to a file, if it doesn't exist, do
# Python 2
if not os.path.isfile(filepath):
f = open(filepath, 'w')
# Python 3: x opens for exclusive creation, failing if the file already exists
try:
f = open(filepath, 'wx')
except IOError:
print 'file already exists'
If you need file locking, that's a different matter.

You could try this (safer):
try:
# http://effbot.org/zone/python-with-statement.htm
# 'with' is safer to open a file
with open('whatever.txt') as fh:
# Do something with 'fh'
except IOError as e:
print("({})".format(e))
The ouput would be:
([Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'whatever.txt')
Then, depending on the result, your program can just keep running from there or you can code to stop it if you want.

Date: 2017-12-04
Every possible solution has been listed in other answers.
An intuitive and arguable way to check if a file exists is the following:
import os
os.path.isfile('~/file.md') # Returns True if exists, else False
# Additionally, check a directory
os.path.isdir('~/folder') # Returns True if the folder exists, else False
# Check either a directory or a file
os.path.exists('~/file')
I made an exhaustive cheat sheet for your reference:
# os.path methods in exhaustive cheat sheet
{'definition': ['dirname',
'basename',
'abspath',
'relpath',
'commonpath',
'normpath',
'realpath'],
'operation': ['split', 'splitdrive', 'splitext',
'join', 'normcase'],
'compare': ['samefile', 'sameopenfile', 'samestat'],
'condition': ['isdir',
'isfile',
'exists',
'lexists'
'islink',
'isabs',
'ismount',],
'expand': ['expanduser',
'expandvars'],
'stat': ['getatime', 'getctime', 'getmtime',
'getsize']}

Although I always recommend using try and except statements, here are a few possibilities for you (my personal favourite is using os.access):
Try opening the file:
Opening the file will always verify the existence of the file. You can make a function just like so:
def File_Existence(filepath):
f = open(filepath)
return True
If it's False, it will stop execution with an unhanded IOError
or OSError in later versions of Python. To catch the exception,
you have to use a try except clause. Of course, you can always
use a try except` statement like so (thanks to hsandt
for making me think):
def File_Existence(filepath):
try:
f = open(filepath)
except IOError, OSError: # Note OSError is for later versions of Python
return False
return True
Use os.path.exists(path):
This will check the existence of what you specify. However, it checks for files and directories so beware about how you use it.
import os.path
>>> os.path.exists("this/is/a/directory")
True
>>> os.path.exists("this/is/a/file.txt")
True
>>> os.path.exists("not/a/directory")
False
Use os.access(path, mode):
This will check whether you have access to the file. It will check for permissions. Based on the os.py documentation, typing in os.F_OK, it will check the existence of the path. However, using this will create a security hole, as someone can attack your file using the time between checking the permissions and opening the file. You should instead go directly to opening the file instead of checking its permissions. (EAFP vs LBYP). If you're not going to open the file afterwards, and only checking its existence, then you can use this.
Anyway, here:
>>> import os
>>> os.access("/is/a/file.txt", os.F_OK)
True
I should also mention that there are two ways that you will not be able to verify the existence of a file. Either the issue will be permission denied or no such file or directory. If you catch an IOError, set the IOError as e (like my first option), and then type in print(e.args) so that you can hopefully determine your issue. I hope it helps! :)

If the file is for opening you could use one of the following techniques:
with open('somefile', 'xt') as f: # Using the x-flag, Python 3.3 and above
f.write('Hello\n')
if not os.path.exists('somefile'):
with open('somefile', 'wt') as f:
f.write("Hello\n")
else:
print('File already exists!')
Note: This finds either a file or a directory with the given name.

Additionally, os.access():
if os.access("myfile", os.R_OK):
with open("myfile") as fp:
return fp.read()
Being R_OK, W_OK, and X_OK the flags to test for permissions (doc).

if os.path.isfile(path_to_file):
try:
open(path_to_file)
pass
except IOError as e:
print "Unable to open file"
Raising exceptions is considered to be an acceptable, and Pythonic,
approach for flow control in your program. Consider handling missing
files with IOErrors. In this situation, an IOError exception will be
raised if the file exists but the user does not have read permissions.
Source: Using Python: How To Check If A File Exists

If you imported NumPy already for other purposes then there is no need to import other libraries like pathlib, os, paths, etc.
import numpy as np
np.DataSource().exists("path/to/your/file")
This will return true or false based on its existence.

Check file or directory exists
You can follow these three ways:
1. Using isfile()
Note 1: The os.path.isfile used only for files
import os.path
os.path.isfile(filename) # True if file exists
os.path.isfile(dirname) # False if directory exists
2. Using exists
Note 2: The os.path.exists is used for both files and directories
import os.path
os.path.exists(filename) # True if file exists
os.path.exists(dirname) # True if directory exists
3. The pathlib.Path method (included in Python 3+, installable with pip for Python 2)
from pathlib import Path
Path(filename).exists()

You can write Brian's suggestion without the try:.
from contextlib import suppress
with suppress(IOError), open('filename'):
process()
suppress is part of Python 3.4. In older releases you can quickly write your own suppress:
from contextlib import contextmanager
#contextmanager
def suppress(*exceptions):
try:
yield
except exceptions:
pass

I'm the author of a package that's been around for about 10 years, and it has a function that addresses this question directly. Basically, if you are on a non-Windows system, it uses Popen to access find. However, if you are on Windows, it replicates find with an efficient filesystem walker.
The code itself does not use a try block… except in determining the operating system and thus steering you to the "Unix"-style find or the hand-buillt find. Timing tests showed that the try was faster in determining the OS, so I did use one there (but nowhere else).
>>> import pox
>>> pox.find('*python*', type='file', root=pox.homedir(), recurse=False)
['/Users/mmckerns/.python']
And the doc…
>>> print pox.find.__doc__
find(patterns[,root,recurse,type]); Get path to a file or directory
patterns: name or partial name string of items to search for
root: path string of top-level directory to search
recurse: if True, recurse down from root directory
type: item filter; one of {None, file, dir, link, socket, block, char}
verbose: if True, be a little verbose about the search
On some OS, recursion can be specified by recursion depth (an integer).
patterns can be specified with basic pattern matching. Additionally,
multiple patterns can be specified by splitting patterns with a ';'
For example:
>>> find('pox*', root='..')
['/Users/foo/pox/pox', '/Users/foo/pox/scripts/pox_launcher.py']
>>> find('*shutils*;*init*')
['/Users/foo/pox/pox/shutils.py', '/Users/foo/pox/pox/__init__.py']
>>>
The implementation, if you care to look, is here:
https://github.com/uqfoundation/pox/blob/89f90fb308f285ca7a62eabe2c38acb87e89dad9/pox/shutils.py#L190

Adding one more slight variation which isn't exactly reflected in the other answers.
This will handle the case of the file_path being None or empty string.
def file_exists(file_path):
if not file_path:
return False
elif not os.path.isfile(file_path):
return False
else:
return True
Adding a variant based on suggestion from Shahbaz
def file_exists(file_path):
if not file_path:
return False
else:
return os.path.isfile(file_path)
Adding a variant based on suggestion from Peter Wood
def file_exists(file_path):
return file_path and os.path.isfile(file_path):

Here's a one-line Python command for the Linux command line environment. I find this very handy since I'm not such a hot Bash guy.
python -c "import os.path; print os.path.isfile('/path_to/file.xxx')"

You can use the "OS" library of Python:
>>> import os
>>> os.path.exists("C:\\Users\\####\\Desktop\\test.txt")
True
>>> os.path.exists("C:\\Users\\####\\Desktop\\test.tx")
False

How do I check whether a file exists, without using the try statement?
In 2016, this is still arguably the easiest way to check if both a file exists and if it is a file:
import os
os.path.isfile('./file.txt') # Returns True if exists, else False
isfile is actually just a helper method that internally uses os.stat and stat.S_ISREG(mode) underneath. This os.stat is a lower-level method that will provide you with detailed information about files, directories, sockets, buffers, and more. More about os.stat here
Note: However, this approach will not lock the file in any way and therefore your code can become vulnerable to "time of check to time of use" (TOCTTOU) bugs.
So raising exceptions is considered to be an acceptable, and Pythonic, approach for flow control in your program. And one should consider handling missing files with IOErrors, rather than if statements (just an advice).