I am trying to run a program that takes in input as a job is getting done. I have looked through several forms, and looked into the documentation. I'm running this in Debian, and I understand that I can use this getch function to receive characters without hitting the return key. To break it down, this is what I am trying to implement in my infinite while loop
Take in input (threading didn't work here for me
Put input into Queue
If there are no running jobs, start the job with the item in front of the queue as a variable
I am also running the threading module to execute another instruction. Is there any way I can do this?
Update: This is what I have tried so far:
First, I tried using a timer from the threading module to stop it from waiting, which went something like this.
def getchnow():
def time_up():
answer= None
print 'time up...'
wait = Timer(5,time_up) # x is amount of time in seconds
wait.start()
try:
print "enter answer below"
answer = getch()
except Exception:
print 'pass\n'
answer = None
if answer != True: # it means if variable have somthing
wait.cancel() # time_up will not execute(so, no skip)
return answer
line = getchnow()
#Add line variable to queue
#Do stuff with queue
The problem here is that it still waited for user input.
I then tried to put the getch function into another thread.
q = Queue.Queue
q.put(getch())
if q.get() != True: # it means if variable have somthing
line = q.get()
#Add line variable to queue
#Do stuff with queue
This attempt doesn't let me do anything.
I read more of this link, and there was an implementation of what I wanted at the bottom.
I used the select module for a Non-Blocking implementation on Linux.
This times out in (5 seconds here) if no input is received.
Particularly useful when used in a thread, so that the getch call is
non-blocking and will allow the thread to exit cleanly
# This class gets a single character input from the keyboard
class _GetchUnix:
def __init__(self):
import tty, sys
from select import select
def __call__(self):
import sys, tty, termios
from select import select
fd = sys.stdin.fileno()
old_settings = termios.tcgetattr(fd)
try:
tty.setraw(sys.stdin.fileno())
[i, o, e] = select([sys.stdin.fileno()], [], [], 2)
if i:
ch=sys.stdin.read(1)
else:
ch=''
finally:
termios.tcsetattr(fd, termios.TCSADRAIN, old_settings)
return ch
getch = _GetchUnix()
# End Class
I've also used [i, o, e] = select([sys.stdin.fileno()], [], [], 2), but I've heard it might not work on windows. If anyone still needs a multi-threaded, non-blocking input example:
import threading
import sys
import time
bufferLock=threading.Lock()
inputBuffer=[]
class InputThread(threading.Thread):
def run(self):
global inputBuffer
print("starting input")
while True:
line=sys.stdin.readline()
bufferLock.acquire()
inputBuffer.insert(0,line)
bufferLock.release()
input_thread=InputThread()
input_thread.start()
while True:
time.sleep(4)
bufferLock.acquire()
if len(inputBuffer)>0:
print("Popping: "+inputBuffer.pop())
bufferLock.release()
Related
I've been trying to find a good limited-input-time code for Python scripts and I finally got a code to work:
from threading import Timer
timeout = 5
t = Timer(timeout, print, ["Time's up!"])
t.start()
entry = input('> ')
t.cancel()
but, I need to be able to run a function when the timer ends.
Also - I want the function called inside of the timer code - otherwise if you type your entry before the timer runs out, the function will still be called no matter what.
Could anyone kindly edit this code I have to be able to run a function when the timer ends?
If it is fine that you block the main thread when the user has not provided any answer, the above code that you have shared might work.
Otherwise you could use msvcrt in the following sense:
import msvcrt
import time
class TimeoutExpired(Exception):
pass
def input_with_timeout(prompt, timeout, timer=time.monotonic):
sys.stdout.write(prompt)
sys.stdout.flush()
endtime = timer() + timeout
result = []
while timer() < endtime:
if msvcrt.kbhit():
result.append(msvcrt.getwche()) #XXX can it block on multibyte characters?
if result[-1] == '\n': #XXX check what Windows returns here
return ''.join(result[:-1])
time.sleep(0.04) # just to yield to other processes/threads
raise TimeoutExpired
The above code is compliant with Python3 and you will need to test it.
Reading from the Python Documentation https://docs.python.org/3/library/threading.html#timer-objects
I have come up with the following snippet which might work(Try running in your command line prompt)
from threading import Timer
def input_with_timeout(x):
def time_up():
answer= None
print('time up...')
t = Timer(x,time_up) # x is amount of time in seconds
t.start()
try:
answer = input("enter answer : ")
except Exception:
print('pass\n')
answer = None
if answer != True: # it means if variable has something
t.cancel() # time_up will not execute(so, no skip)
input_with_timeout(5) # try this for five seconds
Note: I want to do this without using any external packages, like PyGame, etc.
I am attempting to capture individual keypresses as they arrive and perform an action for specific characters, whether I simply want to "re-echo" the character, or not display it at all and do something else.
I have found a cross-platform (though not sure about OS X) getch() implementation because I do not want to read a whole line like input() does:
# http://code.activestate.com/recipes/134892/
def getch():
try:
import termios
except ImportError:
# Non-POSIX. Return msvcrt's (Windows') getch.
import msvcrt
return msvcrt.getch
# POSIX system. Create and return a getch that manipulates the tty.
fd = sys.stdin.fileno()
old_settings = termios.tcgetattr(fd)
try:
tty.setraw(fd)
ch = sys.stdin.read(1)
finally:
termios.tcsetattr(fd, termios.TCSADRAIN, old_settings)
return ch
[Attempt 1]
I first tried a simple while-true loop to poll getch, but if I type too fast, characters go missing. Reducing the sleep time makes it worse. The debug statements only print on press of the enter key and not consistently in time nor position. (It appears there might be some line buffering going on?) Taking out the loop and sleep lets it work once but perfectly.
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import sys
import tty
import time
def main():
while True:
time.sleep(1)
sys.stdout.write(" DEBUG:Before ")
sys.stdout.write(getch())
sys.stdout.write(" DEBUG:After ")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
[Attempt 2]
I got an example for using a threaded approach (https://stackoverflow.com/a/14043979/2752206) but it "locks up" and won't accept any input (including Ctrl-C, and etc)..
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import sys
import tty
import time
import threading
key = 'Z'
def main():
threading.Thread(target=getchThread).start()
while True:
time.sleep(1)
sys.stdout.write(" DEBUG:Before ")
sys.stdout.write(key)
sys.stdout.write(" DEBUG:After ")
def getchThread():
global key
lock = threading.Lock()
while True:
with lock:
key = getch()
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Does anyone have any advice or guidance? Or more importantly, can someone explain why the two attempts do not work? Thanks.
First off, I don't really thing you need multithreading. You'd need that if you, for example, wanted to do some tasks like drawing on screen or whatever and capturing keys while you do this.
Let's consider a case where you only want to capture keys and after each keypress execute some action: Exit, if x was pressed, otherwise just print the character. All you need for this case is simple while loop
def process(key):
if key == 'x':
exit('exitting')
else:
print(key, end="", flush=True)
if __name__ == "__main__":
while True:
key = getch()
process(key)
Notice absence of sleep(). I am assuming you thought getch() won't wait for user input so you set 1s sleep time. However, your getch() waits for one entry and then returns it. In this case, global variable is not really useful, so you might as well just call process(getch()) inside the loop.
print(key, end="", flush=True) => the extra arguments will ensure pressed keys stay on one line, not appending newline character every time you print something.
The other case, where you'd want to execute different stuff simultaneously, should use threading.
Consider this code:
n = 0
quit = False
def process(key):
if key == 'x':
global quit
quit = True
exit('exitting')
elif key == 'n':
global n
print(n)
else:
print(key, end="", flush=True)
def key_capturing():
while True:
process(getch())
if __name__ == "__main__":
threading.Thread(target=key_capturing).start()
while not quit:
n += 1
time.sleep(0.1)
This will create global variable n and increment it 10 times a second in main thread. Simultaneously, key_capturing method listens to keys pressed and does the same thing as in previous example + when you press n on your keyboard, current value of the global variable n will be printed.
Closing note: as #zondo noted, you really missed braces in the getch() definition. return msvcrt.getch should most likely be return msvcrt.getch()
So I'm trying to utilize msvcrt.getch() to make an option to quit(without using KeyBoardInterrupt) anywhere in the program.
My code currently looks like this:
import msvcrt
import sys
print("Press q at any time to quit")
while True:
pressedKey = msvcrt.getch()
if pressedKey == 'q':
sys.exit()
else:
# do some setup
if myvar == "string":
try:
# do stuff
except:
# do stuff
else:
#do stuff
How do I run the while loop to detect the keypress of q at the same time as I'm running the other (the # do stuff blocks)?
That way, if the user goes ahead with the program, they it'll only run it once. But if they hit q, then the program will quit.
You could read keys in a separate thread or (better) use msvcrt.kbhit() as #martineau suggested:
#!/usr/bin/env python
import msvcrt
from Queue import Empty, Queue
from threading import Thread
def read_keys(queue):
for key in iter(msvcrt.getch, 'q'): # until `q`
queue.put(key)
queue.put(None) # signal the end
q = Queue()
t = Thread(target=read_keys, args=[q])
t.daemon = True # die if the program exits
t.start()
while True:
try:
key = q.get_nowait() # doesn't block
except Empty:
key = Empty
else:
if key is None: # end
break
# do stuff
If I wanted to do something in the main code when the second thread detected a certain keypress, how would I act on that?
You do not react to the key press in the main thread until code reaches q.get_nowait() again i.e., you won't notice the key press until "do stuff" finishes the current iteration of the loop. If you need to do something that may take a long time then you might need to run it in yet another thread (start new thread or use a thread pool if blocking at some point is acceptable).
I have an infinite while loop that I want to break out of when the user presses a key. Usually I use raw_input to get the user's response; however, I need raw_input to not wait for the response. I want something like this:
print 'Press enter to continue.'
while True:
# Do stuff
#
# User pressed enter, break out of loop
This should be a simple, but I can't seem to figure it out. I'm leaning towards a solution using threading, but I would rather not have to do that. How can I accomplish this?
You can use non-blocking read from stdin:
import sys
import os
import fcntl
import time
fl = fcntl.fcntl(sys.stdin.fileno(), fcntl.F_GETFL)
fcntl.fcntl(sys.stdin.fileno(), fcntl.F_SETFL, fl | os.O_NONBLOCK)
while True:
print("Waiting for user input")
try:
stdin = sys.stdin.read()
if "\n" in stdin or "\r" in stdin:
break
except IOError:
pass
time.sleep(1)
I think you can do better with msvcrt:
import msvcrt, time
i = 0
while True:
i = i + 1
if msvcrt.kbhit():
if msvcrt.getwche() == '\r':
break
time.sleep(0.1)
print(i)
Sadly, still windows-specific.
On python 3.5 you can use the following code. It can be adjusted for a specific keystroke. The while loop will keep running until the user presses a key.
import time
import threading
# set global variable flag
flag = 1
def normal():
global flag
while flag==1:
print('normal stuff')
time.sleep(2)
if flag==False:
print('The while loop is now closing')
def get_input():
global flag
keystrk=input('Press a key \n')
# thread doesn't continue until key is pressed
print('You pressed: ', keystrk)
flag=False
print('flag is now:', flag)
n=threading.Thread(target=normal)
i=threading.Thread(target=get_input)
n.start()
i.start()
I could not get some of the popular answers working. So I came up with another approach using the CTRL + C to plug in user input and imbibe a keyboard interrupt. A simple solution can be using a try-catch block,
i = 0
try:
while True:
i+=1
print(i)
sleep(1)
except:
pass
# do what you want to do after it...
I got this idea from running a number of servers like flask and django. This might be slightly different from what the OP asked, but it might help someone else who wanted a similar thing.
Using the msvcrt module as thebjorn recommended I was able to come up with something that works. The following is a basic example that will exit the loop if any key is pressed, not just enter.
import msvcrt, time
i = 0
while True:
i = i + 1
if msvcrt.kbhit():
break
time.sleep(0.1)
print i
What you need is a non-blocking raw input, if you don't want to use threads there is a simple solution like this one below where he is doing a timeout of 20 ms and then raise and exception if the user doesn't press a key, if he does then the class returns the key pressed.
import signal
class AlarmException(Exception):
pass
def alarmHandler(signum, frame):
raise AlarmException
def nonBlockingRawInput(prompt='', timeout=20):
signal.signal(signal.SIGALRM, alarmHandler)
signal.alarm(timeout)
try:
text = raw_input(prompt)
signal.alarm(0)
return text
except AlarmException:
print '\nPrompt timeout. Continuing...'
signal.signal(signal.SIGALRM, signal.SIG_IGN)
return ''
Source code
I have defined the function which ask number input from the user and returns the factorial of that number. If user wants to stop they have to press 0 and then it will exit from the loop. We can specify any specific key to input 'n' to exit from the loop.
import math
def factorial_func(n):
return math.factorial(n)
while True:
n = int(input("Please enter the number to find factorial: "))
print(factorial_func(n))
if n == 0:
exit()
I'm trying out threads in python. I want a spinning cursor to display while another method runs (for 5-10 mins). I've done out some code but am wondering is this how you would do it? i don't like to use globals, so I assume there is a better way?
c = True
def b():
for j in itertools.cycle('/-\|'):
if (c == True):
sys.stdout.write(j)
sys.stdout.flush()
time.sleep(0.1)
sys.stdout.write('\b')
else:
return
def a():
global c
#code does stuff here for 5-10 minutes
#simulate with sleep
time.sleep(2)
c = False
Thread(target = a).start()
Thread(target = b).start()
EDIT:
Another issue now is that when the processing ends the last element of the spinning cursor is still on screen. so something like \ is printed.
You could use events:
http://docs.python.org/2/library/threading.html
I tested this and it works. It also keeps everything in sync. You should avoid changing/reading the same variables in different threads without synchronizing them.
#!/usr/bin/python
from threading import Thread
from threading import Event
import time
import itertools
import sys
def b(event):
for j in itertools.cycle('/-\|'):
if not event.is_set():
sys.stdout.write(j)
sys.stdout.flush()
time.sleep(0.1)
sys.stdout.write('\b')
else:
return
def a(event):
#code does stuff here for 5-10 minutes
#simulate with sleep
time.sleep(2)
event.set()
def main():
c = Event()
Thread(target = a, kwargs = {'event': c}).start()
Thread(target = b, kwargs = {'event': c}).start()
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Related to 'kwargs', from Python docs (URL in the beginning of the post):
class threading.Thread(group=None, target=None, name=None, args=(), kwargs={})
...
kwargs is a dictionary of keyword arguments for the target invocation. Defaults to {}.
You're on the right track mostly, except for the global variable. Normally you'd needed to coordinate access to shared data like that with a lock or semaphore, but in this special case you can take a short-cut and just use whether one of the threads is running or not instead. This is what I mean:
from threading import Thread
from threading import Event
import time
import itertools
import sys
def monitor_thread(watched_thread):
chars = itertools.cycle('/-\|')
while watched_thread.is_alive():
sys.stdout.write(chars.next())
sys.stdout.flush()
time.sleep(0.1)
sys.stdout.write('\b')
def worker_thread():
# code does stuff here - simulated with sleep
time.sleep(2)
if __name__ == "__main__":
watched_thread = Thread(target=worker_thread)
watched_thread.start()
Thread(target=monitor_thread, args=(watched_thread,)).start()
This is not properly synchronized. But I will not try to explain it all to you right now because it's a whole lot of knowledge. Try to read this: http://effbot.org/zone/thread-synchronization.htm
But in your case it's not that bad that things aren't synchronized correctyl. The only thing that could happen, is that the spining bar spins a few ms longer than the background task actually needs.