Extracting part of a string with regex - python

I am trying to extract two characters from the middle of a string. From the strings ['data_EL27.dat', 'data.BV256.dat', 'data_BV257.dat'], I wish to output ['EL', 'BV', 'BV'].
Here's what I have using regex, this seems overly clunky for such a simple task, I feel like I'm missing some nicer way of doing this.
import re
str = 'data_EL27.dat'
m = re.search(r'(?:data[._])(\w{2})', str)
m.group(1) # 'EL'
I realise that in this case I can just take str[5:7] but I don't want to rely on the length of the prefix remaining the same.

Shouldn't it be just
m=re.search("data.(..)",str)
?

Related

How to extract a numeric value from a line of text with a regular expression?

I'm new to regular expressions, help me extract the necessary information from the text:
salespackquantity=1&itemCode=3760041","quantity_box_sales_uom"
&salespackquantity=1&itemCode=2313441","quantity_box
I need to take the numbers 3760041 and 2313441 respectively. What should a regular expression look like?
If we're dealing with just line-based data as you show it could be as easy as:
.*itemCode=([0-9]+).*
Which is brutal but would do the work. You'd extract the first matching group.
Although your example seems inconsistent and truncated, so this may vary. Please provide more details if there are other conditions.
Example
>>> import re
>>> oneline = "salespackquantity=1&itemCode=3760041\",\"quantity_box_sales_uom\""
>>> match = re.search('.*itemCode=([0-9]+).*', oneline)
>>> match.group(0)
'salespackquantity=1&itemCode=3760041","quantity_box_sales_uom"'
>>> match.group(1)
'3760041'
Do you really need regex?
Arguably, a regex seems an easy way to get what you want here, but it might be grossly inefficient, depending on your use case and input data.
Several other strategies might be easier:
remove unnecessary data first,
use a proper parser for your specific content (here this looks like a mix of a CSV and URL query strings),
don't even bother and cut on appropriate boundaries, if the format is fixed.
Regex are powerful, and can be overly powerful for simple scenarios. Totally fair if it's to run a one-off data extraction script, though, or if the cost/benefit analysis of the development effort is worth it.
a = "example is the int and string 223576"
ext = []
b = "1234567890"
for i in a:
if i in b:
ext.append(i)
print(ext)

Regular expression for 'b' not preceded by an odd number of 'a's [duplicate]

I've recently decided to jump into the deep end of the Python pool and start converting some of my R code over to Python and I'm stuck on something that is very important to me. In my line of work, I spend a lot of time parsing text data, which, as we all know, is very unstructured. As a result, I've come to rely on the lookaround feature of regex and R's lookaround functionality is quite robust. For example, if I'm parsing a PDF that might introduce some spaces in between letters when I OCR the file, I'd get to the value I want with something like this:
oAcctNum <- str_extract(textBlock[indexVal], "(?<=ORIG\\s?:\\s?/\\s?)[A-Z0-9]+")
In Python, this isn't possible because the use of ? makes the lookbehind a variable-width expression as opposed to a fixed-width. This functionality is important enough to me that it deters me from wanting to use Python, but instead of giving up on the language I'd like to know the Pythonista way of addressing this issue. Would I have to preprocess the string before extracting the text? Something like this:
oAcctNum = re.sub(r"(?<=\b\w)\s(?=\w\b)", "")
oAcctNum = re.search(r"(?<=ORIG:/)([A-Z0-9])", textBlock[indexVal]).group(1)
Is there a more efficient way to do this? Because while this example was trivial, this issue comes up in very complex ways with the data I work with and I'd hate to have to do this kind of preprocessing for every line of text I analyze.
Lastly, I apologize if this is not the right place to ask this question; I wasn't sure where else to post it. Thanks in advance.
Notice that if you can use groups, you generally do not need lookbehinds. So how about
match = re.search(r"ORIG\s?:\s?/\s?([A-Z0-9]+)", string)
if match:
text = match.group(1)
In practice:
>>> string = 'ORIG : / AB123'
>>> match = re.search(r"ORIG\s?:\s?/\s?([A-Z0-9]+)", string)
>>> match
<_sre.SRE_Match object; span=(0, 12), match='ORIG : / AB123'>
>>> match.group(1)
'AB123'
You need to use capture groups in this case you described:
"(?<=ORIG\\s?:\\s?/\\s?)[A-Z0-9]+"
will become
r"ORIG\s?:\s?/\s?([A-Z0-9]+)"
The value will be in .group(1). Note that raw strings are preferred.
Here is a sample code:
import re
p = re.compile(r'ORIG\s?:\s?/\s?([A-Z0-9]+)', re.IGNORECASE)
test_str = "ORIG:/texthere"
print re.search(p, test_str).group(1)
IDEONE demo
Unless you need overlapping matches, capturing groups usage instead of a look-behind is rather straightforward.
print re.findall(r"ORIG\s?:\s?/\s?([A-Z0-9]+)",test_str)
You can directly use findall which will return all the groups in the regex if present.

Find string in possibly multiple parentheses?

I am looking for a regular expression that discriminates between a string that contains a numerical value enclosed between parentheses, and a string that contains outside of them. The problem is, parentheses may be embedded into each other:
So, for example the expression should match the following strings:
hey(example1)
also(this(onetoo2(hard)))
but(here(is(a(harder)one)maybe23)Hehe)
But it should not match any of the following:
this(one)is22misleading
how(to(go)on)with(multiple)3parent(heses(around))
So far I've tried
\d[A-Za-z] \)
and easy things like this one. The problem with this one is it does not match the example 2, because it has a ( string after it.
How could I solve this one?
The problem is not one of pattern matching. That means regular expressions are not the right tool for this.
Instead, you need lexical analysis and parsing. There are many libraries available for that job.
You might try the parsing or pyparsing libraries.
These type of regexes are not always easy, but sometimes it's possible to come up with a way provided the input remains somewhat consistent. A pattern generally like this should work:
(.*(\([\d]+[^(].*\)|\(.*[^)][\d]+.*\)).*)
Code:
import re
p = re.compile(ur'(.*(\([\d]+[^(].*\)|\(.*[^)][\d]+.*\)).*)', re.MULTILINE)
result = re.findall(p, searchtext)
print(result)
Result:
https://regex101.com/r/aL8bB8/1

How to regex split, but keep the split string?

I have the following URL pattern:
http://www.hulu.jp/watch/589851/supernatural-dub-hollywood-babylon/en
I would like to get everything up until and inclusive of /watch/\d+/.
So far I have:
>>> re.split(r'watch/\d+/', 'http://www.hulu.jp/watch/589851/supernatural-dub-hollywood-babylon/en')
['http://www.hulu.jp/', 'supernatural-dub-hollywood-babylon/en']
But this does not include the split string (the string which appears between the domain and the path). The end answer I want to achieve is:
http://www.hulu.jp/watch/589851
You need to use capture group :
>>> re.split(r'(watch/\d+/)', 'http://www.hulu.jp/watch/589851/supernatural-dub-hollywood-babylon/en')
['http://www.hulu.jp/', 'watch/589851/', 'supernatural-dub-hollywood-babylon/en']
As mentioned in the other answer, you need to use groups to capture the "glue" between the split strings.
I wonder though, is what you want here a split() or a search()? It looks (from the sample) that you're trying to extract from a URL everything from the first occurrence of /watch/XXX/ where XXX is 1 or more digits, to the end of the string. If that's the case, then a match/search might be more suitable, as with a split if the search regex can match multiple times you'll split into multiple groups. Ex:
re.split(r'(watch/\d+/)', 'http://www.hulu.jp/watch/589851/supernatural-dub-hollywood-babylon/watch/2342/fdsaafsdf')
['http://www.hulu.jp/', 'watch/589851/', 'supernatural-dub-hollywood-babylon/', 'watch/2342/', 'fdsaafsdf']
Which doesn't look like what you want. Instead perhaps:
result = re.search(r'(watch/\d+/)(.*)', 'http://www.hulu.jp/watch/589851/supernatural-dub-hollywood-babylon/watch/2342/fdsaafsdf')
result.groups() if result else []
which gives:
('watch/589851/', 'supernatural-dub-hollywood-babylon/watch/2342/fdsaafsdf')
You could also use this approach combined with named groups to get extra fancy:
result = re.search(r'(?P<watchId>watch/\d+/)(?P<path>.*)', 'http://www.hulu.jp/watch/589851/supernatural-dub-hollywood-babylon/watch/2342/fdsaafsdf')
result.groupdict() if result else {}
giving:
{'path': 'supernatural-dub-hollywood-babylon/watch/2342/fdsaafsdf', 'watchId': 'watch/589851/'}
If you're set on the split() approach, you can also set the maxsplit parameter to ensure it's only split once:
re.split(r'(watch/\d+/)', 'http://www.hulu.jp/watch/589851/supernatural-dub-hollywood-babylon/watch/2342/fdsaafsdf', maxsplit=1)
giving:
['http://www.hulu.jp/', 'watch/589851/', 'supernatural-dub-hollywood-babylon/watch/2342/fdsaafsdf']
Personally though, I find that when parsing URL's into constituent parts the search() with named groups approach works extremely well as it allows you to name the various parts in the regex itself, and via groupdict() get a nice dictionary you can use for working with those parts.
You've surely seen the Stack Overflow don't-parse-HTML-with-regex post, yes?
You can't parse [X]HTML with regex. Because HTML can't be parsed by regex. Regex is not a tool that can be used to correctly parse HTML. As I have answered in HTML-and-regex questions here so many times before, the use of regex will not allow you to consume HTML.
Well, regex can parse URLs, but trying to do so when there's a plethora of better tools is foolish.
This is what a regex for URLs looks like:
^(?:(?:https?|ftp):\/\/)(?:\S+(?::\S*)?#)?(?:(?!10(?:\.\d{1,3}){3})(?!127(?:\.\d{1,3}){3})(?!169\.254(?:\.\d{1,3}){2})(?!192\.168(?:\.\d{1,3}){2})(?!172\.(?:1[6-9]|2\d|3[0-1])(?:\.\d{1,3}){2})(?:[1-9]\d?|1\d\d|2[01]\d|22[0-3])(?:\.(?:1?\d{1,2}|2[0-4]\d|25[0-5])){2}(?:\.(?:[1-9]\d?|1\d\d|2[0-4]\d|25[0-4]))|(?:(?:[a-z\x{00a1}-\x{ffff}0-9]+-?)*[a-z\x{00a1}-\x{ffff}0-9]+)(?:\.(?:[a-z\x{00a1}-\x{ffff}0-9]+-?)*[a-z\x{00a1}-\x{ffff}0-9]+)*(?:\.(?:[a-z\x{00a1}-\x{ffff}]{2,})))(?::\d{2,5})?(?:\/[^\s]*)?$ (+ caseless flag)
It's just a mess of characters, right? Exactly!
Don't parse URLs with regex... almost.
There is one simple thing:
A path-relative URL must be zero or more path segments separated from each other by a "/".
Splitting the URL should be as simple as url.split("/").
from urllib.parse import urlparse, urlunparse
myurl = "http://www.hulu.jp/watch/589851/supernatural-dub-hollywood-babylon/en"
# Run a parser over it
parts = urlparse(myurl)
# Crop the path to UP TO length 2
new_path = str("/".join(parts.path.split("/")[:3]))
# Unparse
urlunparse(parts._replace(path=new_path))
#>>> 'http://www.hulu.jp/watch/589851'
You can try following regex
.*\/watch\/\d+
Working Demo

python regex and replace

I am trying to learn python and regex at the same time and I am having some trouble in finding how to match till end of string and make a replacement on the fly.
So, I have a string like so:
ss="this_is_my_awesome_string/mysuperid=687y98jhAlsji"
What I'd want is to first find 687y98jhAlsji (I do not know this content before hand) and then replace it to myreplacedstuff like so:
ss="this_is_my_awesome_string/mysuperid=myreplacedstuff"
Ideally, I'd want to do a regex and replace by first finding the contents after mysuperid= (till the end of string) and then perform a .replace or .sub if this makes sense.
I would appreciate any guidance on this.
You can try this:
re.sub(r'[^=]+$', 'myreplacedstuff', ss)
The idea is to use a character class that exclude the delimiter (here =) and to anchor the pattern with $
explanation:
[^=] is a character class and means all characters that are not =
[^=]+ one or more characters from this class
$ end of the string
Since the regex engine works from the left to the right, only characters that are not an = at the end of the string are matched.
You can use regular expressions:
>>> import re
>>> mymatch = re.search(r'mysuperid=(.*)', ss)
>>> ss.replace(mymatch.group(1), 'replacing_stuff')
'this_is_my_awesome_string/mysuperid=replacing_stuff'
You should probably use #Casimir's answer though. It looks cleaner, and I'm not that good at regex :p.

Categories

Resources