Assume:
string="aacctcaaaca"
find="aaa"
and I want to find all occurrences of find.
Usually, I would do
re.findall(find, string)
The catch is that the string is circular, i.e. the start/end of the string is irrelevant. So the "aaa" made up of the first two + last a's should also be counted.
In addition, I would like to find the start position of the match (6 and 10 in the above example)
I was thinking about adding string[0:len(find)-1] to string and performing the re on that new string
i.e.
re.findall(find, string+string[0:len(find)-1])
Does that sound right? Any other ideas/suggestions?
Your current approach seems perfectly reasonable. Another option is to just concatenate the entire string and ignore any matches that start after the wrapping.
For example:
string="aacctcaaaca"
find="aaa"
[m.group(0) for m in re.finditer(find, string+string) if m.start() < len(string)]
This is a bit more extensible because you can use an arbitrary regex such as a{3,} where you might not be able to rely on len(find).
As suggested by mgilson in comments you can make this more efficient by using itertools so that you aren't finding repeat matches unnecessarily.
It would look something like this:
from itertools import takewhile
takewhile(lambda m: m.start() < len(string), re.finditer(find, string+string))
Note that this will return an iterable of match objects instead of a list of the matched substrings.
Related
In python, I can easily search for the first occurrence of a regex within a string like this:
import re
re.search("pattern", "target_text")
Now I need to find the last occurrence of the regex in a string, this doesn't seems to be supported by re module.
I can reverse the string to "search for the first occurrence", but I also need to reverse the regex, which is a much harder problem.
I can also iterate to find all occurrences from left to right, and just keep the last one, but that looks awkward.
Is there a smart way to find the rightmost occurrence?
One approach is to prefix the regex with (?s:.*) and force the engine to try matching at the furthest position and gradually backing off:
re.search("(?s:.*)pattern", "target_text")
Do note that the result of this method may differ from re.findall("pattern", "target_text")[-1], since the findall method searches for non-overlapping matches, and not all substrings which can be matched are included in the result.
For example, executing the regex a.a on abaca, findall would return aba as the only match and select it as the last match, while the code above will return aca as the match.
Yet another alternative is to use regex package, which supports REVERSE matching mode.
The result would be more or less the same as the method with (?s:.*) in re package as described above. However, since I haven't tried the package myself, it's not clear how backreference works in REVERSE mode - the pattern might require modification in such cases.
import re
re.search("pattern(?!.*pattern)", "target_text")
or
import re
re.findall("pattern", "target_text")[-1]
You can use these 2 approaches.
If you want positions use
x="abc abc abc"
print [(i.start(),i.end(),i.group()) for i in re.finditer(r"abc",x)][-1]
One approach is to use split. For example if you wanted to get the last group after ':' in this sample string:
mystr = 'dafdsaf:ewrewre:cvdsfad:ewrerae'
':'.join(mystr.split(':')[-1:])
I have a class called Pattern, and within it two methods, equates and setwildcard. Equates returns the index in which a substring first appears in a string, and setwildcard sets a wild card character in a substring
So
p = Pattern('xyz')
t = 'xxxxxyz'
p.equates(t)
Returns 4
Also
p = Pattern('x*z', '*')
t = 'xxxxxgzx'
p.equates(t)
Returns 4, because * is the wildcard and can match any letter within t, as long as x and z match.
What's the best way to implement this?
Regex, like the accepted answer suggests, is one way of handling the problem. Although, if you need a simpler pattern (such as Unix shell-style wildcards), then the fnmatch built in library can help:
Expressions:
* - matches everything
? - matches any single character
[seq] - matches any character in seq
[!seq] - matches any character not in seq
So for example, trying to find anything that would match with localhost:
import fnmatch
my_pattern = "http://localhost*"
name_to_check = "http://localhost:8080"
fnmatch.fnmatch(name_to_check, my_pattern) # True
The nice part of this is that / is not considered a special character, so for filename/URL matching this works out quite well without having to pre-escape all slashes!
It looks like you're essentially implementing a subset of regular expressions. Luckily, Python has a library for that built-in! If you're not familiar with how regular expressions (or, as their friends call them, regexes) work, I highly recommend you read through the documentation for them.
In any event, the function re.search is, I think, exactly what you're looking for. It takes, as its first argument, a pattern to match, and, as its second argument, the string to match it in. If the pattern is matched, search returns an SRE_Match object, which, conveniently, has a #start() method that returns the index at which the match starts.
To use the data from your example:
import re
start_index = re.search(r'x.z', 'xxxxxgzg').start()
Note that, in regexes, . - not * -- is the wildcard, so you'll have to replace them in the pattern you're using.
I am using python 2.6 and trying to find a bunch of repeating characters in a string, let's say a bunch of n's, e.g. nnnnnnnABCnnnnnnnnnDEF. In any place of the string the number of n's can be variable.
If I construct a regex like this:
re.findall(r'^(((?i)n)\2{2,})', s),
I can find occurences of case-insensitive n's only in the beginning of the string, which is fine. If I do it like this:
re.findall(r'(((?i)n)\2{2,}$)', s),
I can detect the ones only in the end of the sequence. But what about just in the middle?
At first, I thought of using re.findall(r'(((?i)n)\2{2,})', s) and the two previous regex(-ices?) to check the length of the returned list and the presence of n's either in the beginning or end of the string and make logical tests, but it became an ugly if-else mess very quickly.
Then, I tried re.findall(r'(?!^)(((?i)n)\2{2,})', s), which seems to exlude the beginning just fine but (?!$) or (?!\z) at the end of the regex only excludes the last n in ABCnnnn. Finally, I tried re.findall(r'(?!^)(((?i)n)\2{2,})\w+', s) which seems to work sometimes, but I get weird results at others. It feels like I need a lookahead or lookbehind, but I can't wrap my head around them.
Instead of using a complicated regex in order to refuse of matching the leading and trailing n characters. As a more pythonic approach you can strip() your string then find all the sequence of ns using re.findall() and a simple regex:
>>> s = "nnnABCnnnnDEFnnnnnGHInnnnnn"
>>> import re
>>>
>>> re.findall(r'n{2,}', s.strip('n'), re.I)
['nnnn', 'nnnnn']
Note : re.I is Ignore-case flag which makes the regex engine matches upper case and lower case characters.
Since "n" is a character (and not a subpattern), you can simply use:
re.findall(r'(?<=[^n])nn+(?=[^n])(?i)', s)
or better:
re.findall(r'n(?<=[^n]n)n+(?=[^n])(?i)', s)
NOTE: This solution assumes n may be a sequence of some characters. For more efficient alternatives when n is just 1 character, see other answers here.
You can use
(?<!^)(?<!n)((n)\2{2,})(?!$)(?!n)
See the regex demo
The regex will match repeated consecutive ns (ignoring case can be achieved with re.I flag) that are not at the beginning ((?<!^)) or end ((?!$)) of the string and not before ((?!n)) or after ((?<!n)) another n.
The (?<!^)(?<!n) is a sequence of 2 lookbehinds: (?<!^) means do not consume the next pattern if preceded with the start of the string. The (?<!n) negative lookbehind means do not consume the next pattern if preceded with n. The negative lookaheads (?!$) and (?!n)have similar meanings: (?!$) fails a match if after the current position the end of string occurs and (?!n) will fail a match if n occurs after the current position in string (that is, right after matching all consecutive ns. The lookaround conditions must all be met, that is why we only get the innermost matches.
See IDEONE demo:
import re
p = re.compile(r'(?<!^)(?<!n)((n)\2{2,})(?!$)(?!n)', re.IGNORECASE)
s = "nnnnnnnABCnnnnnNnnnnDEFnNn"
print([x.group() for x in p.finditer(s)])
I have a regular expression to find :ABC:`hello` pattern. This is the code.
format =r".*\:(.*)\:\`(.*)\`"
patt = re.compile(format, re.I|re.U)
m = patt.match(l.rstrip())
if m:
...
It works well when the pattern happens once in a line, but with an example ":tagbox:`Verilog` :tagbox:`Multiply` :tagbox:`VHDL`". It finds only the last one.
How can I find all the three patterns?
EDIT
Based on Paul Z's answer, I could get it working with this code
format = r"\:([^:]*)\:\`([^`]*)\`"
patt = re.compile(format, re.I|re.U)
for m in patt.finditer(l.rstrip()):
tag, value = m.groups()
print tag, ":::", value
Result
tagbox ::: Verilog
tagbox ::: Multiply
tagbox ::: VHDL
Yeah, dcrosta suggested looking at the re module docs, which is probably a good idea, but I'm betting you actually wanted the finditer function. Try this:
format = r"\:(.*)\:\`(.*)\`"
patt = re.compile(format, re.I|re.U)
for m in patt.finditer(l.rstrip()):
tag, value = m.groups()
....
Your current solution always finds the last one because the initial .* eats as much as it can while still leaving a valid match (the last one). Incidentally this is also probably making your program incredibly slower than it needs to be, because .* first tries to eat the entire string, then backs up character by character as the remaining expression tells it "that was too much, go back". Using finditer should be much more performant.
A good place to start is there module docs. In addition to re.match (which searches starting explicitly at the beginning of the string), there is re.findall (finds all non-overlapping occurrences of the pattern), and the methods match and search of compiled RegexObjects, both of which accept start and end positions to limit the portion of the string being considered. See also split, which returns a list of substrings, split by the pattern. Depending on how you want your output, one of these may help.
re.findall or even better regex.findall can do that for you in a single line:
import regex as re #or just import re
s = ":tagbox:`Verilog` :tagbox:`Multiply` :tagbox:`VHDL`"
format = r"\:([^:]*)\:\`([^`]*)\`"
re.findall(format,s)
result is:
[('tagbox', 'Verilog'), ('tagbox', 'Multiply'), ('tagbox', 'VHDL')]
I have a couple email addresses, 'support#company.com' and '1234567#tickets.company.com'.
In perl, I could take the To: line of a raw email and find either of the above addresses with
/\w+#(tickets\.)?company\.com/i
In python, I simply wrote the above regex as'\w+#(tickets\.)?company\.com' expecting the same result. However, support#company.com isn't found at all and a findall on the second returns a list containing only 'tickets.'. So clearly the '(tickets\.)?' is the problem area, but what exactly is the difference in regular expression rules between Perl and Python that I'm missing?
The documentation for re.findall:
findall(pattern, string, flags=0)
Return a list of all non-overlapping matches in the string.
If one or more groups are present in the pattern, return a
list of groups; this will be a list of tuples if the pattern
has more than one group.
Empty matches are included in the result.
Since (tickets\.) is a group, findall returns that instead of the whole match. If you want the whole match, put a group around the whole pattern and/or use non-grouping matches, i.e.
r'(\w+#(tickets\.)?company\.com)'
r'\w+#(?:tickets\.)?company\.com'
Note that you'll have to pick out the first element of each tuple returned by findall in the first case.
I think the problem is in your expectations of extracted values. Try using this in your current Python code:
'(\w+#(?:tickets\.)?company\.com)'
Two problems jump out at me:
You need to use a raw string to avoid having to escape "\"
You need to escape "."
So try:
r'\w+#(tickets\.)?company\.com'
EDIT
Sample output:
>>> import re
>>> exp = re.compile(r'\w+#(tickets\.)?company\.com')
>>> bool(exp.match("s#company.com"))
True
>>> bool(exp.match("1234567#tickets.company.com"))
True
There isn't a difference in the regexes, but there is a difference in what you are looking for. Your regex is capturing only "tickets." if it exists in both regexes. You probably want something like this
#!/usr/bin/python
import re
regex = re.compile("(\w+#(?:tickets\.)?company\.com)");
a = [
"foo#company.com",
"foo#tickets.company.com",
"foo#ticketsacompany.com",
"foo#compant.org"
];
for string in a:
print regex.findall(string)