opening another program through windows service using python - python

I'm trying to open/execute another program through windows service using python code. When the windows service gets started, another program i.e Notepad will be executed. The code is fine without error but it doesn't open the program. Code is given below.
Code:
import win32serviceutil
import win32service
import win32event
import win32com.shell.shell as w32shell
import os
import sys
import win32process as process
class SmallestPythonService(win32serviceutil.ServiceFramework):
_svc_name_ = "BSmallestPythonService"
_svc_display_name_ = "BSmallest possible Python Service"
def __init__(self, args):
win32serviceutil.ServiceFramework.__init__(self, args)
# Create an event which we will use to wait on.
# The "service stop" request will set this event.
self.hWaitStop = win32event.CreateEvent(None, 0, 0, None)
def SvcStop(self):
# Before we do anything, tell the SCM we are starting the stop process.
self.ReportServiceStatus(win32service.SERVICE_STOP_PENDING)
# And set my event.
win32event.SetEvent(self.hWaitStop)
def SvcDoRun(self):
win32event.WaitForSingleObject(self.hWaitStop, win32event.INFINITE)
import subprocess
cmd = "notepad.exe"
process = subprocess.Popen(cmd, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, creationflags=0x08000000)
process.wait()
if __name__=='__main__':
win32serviceutil.HandleCommandLine(SmallestPythonService)
In SvcDoRun method i've tried the following code but no success:
import subprocess
subprocess.Popen('calc.exe', shell=False)
Also tried but no success:
import subprocess
subprocess.call('notepad.exe', shell=False)
also tried but no success:
import win32api
win32api.WinExec('NOTEPAD.exe') # Works seamlessly
I'm missing something? or I'm doing it in the wrong way! Please Help

Windows services run in session 0, and interactive programs run in a different session. Typically this will be session 1 when there is a single logged on user. Now, your code will be creating processes in session 0, since it runs in session 0. And so the interactive user desktop in session 1 cannot interact with those processes.
It is possible to start processes the run in a different session from the process parent, but it is not at all easy: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/winsdk/archive/2009/07/14/launching-an-interactive-process-from-windows-service-in-windows-vista-and-later.aspx
One possible way out for you is to run a background process that is started when each user logs on. The service can communicate with the background process using IPC and ask the background process to do the leg work of starting the process in the interactive desktop.

Related

Cannot get subprocess return code in python3

I'm trying to make something like supervisor for my python daemon process and found out that same code works in python2 and doesn't work in python3.
Generally, I've come to this minimal example code.
daemon.py
#!/usr/bin/env python
import signal
import sys
import os
def stop(*args, **kwargs):
print('daemon exited', os.getpid())
sys.exit(0)
signal.signal(signal.SIGTERM, stop)
print('daemon started', os.getpid())
while True:
pass
supervisor.py
import os
import signal
import subprocess
from time import sleep
parent_pid = os.getpid()
commands = [
[
'./daemon.py'
]
]
popen_list = []
for command in commands:
popen = subprocess.Popen(command, preexec_fn=os.setsid)
popen_list.append(popen)
def stop_workers(*args, **kwargs):
for popen in popen_list:
print('send_signal', popen.pid)
popen.send_signal(signal.SIGTERM)
while True:
popen_return_code = popen.poll()
if popen_return_code is not None:
break
sleep(5)
signal.signal(signal.SIGTERM, stop_workers)
for popen in popen_list:
print('wait_main', popen.wait())
If you run supervisor.py and then call kill -15 on its pid, then it will hang in infinite loop, because popen_return_code will never be not None. I discovered, that it's basically because of adding threading.Lock for wait_pid operation (source), but how can I rewrite code so it'll handle child exit correctly?
This is an interesting case.
I've spent few hours trying to figure out the reason why this happens and the only thing I came up with at this moment is that the implementation of wait() and poll() have been changed in python3 versus python2.7.
Looking into the source code of python3/suprocess.py implementation, we can see that there is a lock acquire happens when you call wait() method of Popen object, see
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/Lib/subprocess.py#L1402.
This lock prevents further poll() calls to work as expected until the lock acquired by wait() will be released, see
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/Lib/subprocess.py#L1355
and comment there
Something else is busy calling waitpid. Don't allow two
at once. We know nothing yet.
There is no such a lock in python2.7/subprocess.py so this looks like a reason why it works in python2.7 and doesn't work in python3.
However I don't see a reason why are you trying to poll() inside the signal handler, try rewrite your supervisor.py as following, this should work as expected both on python3 and python2.7
supervisor.py
import os
import signal
import subprocess
from time import sleep
parent_pid = os.getpid()
commands = [
[
'./daemon.py'
]
]
popen_list = []
for command in commands:
popen = subprocess.Popen(command, preexec_fn=os.setsid)
popen_list.append(popen)
def stop_workers(*args, **kwargs):
for popen in popen_list:
print('send_signal', popen.pid)
popen.send_signal(signal.SIGTERM)
signal.signal(signal.SIGTERM, stop_workers)
for popen in popen_list:
print('wait_main', popen.wait())
Hope this helps
Generally, I agree with answer from #risboo6909, but also have some thoughts, how to fix this situation.
You can change subproccess.Popen to psutil.Popen.
In main loop instead of popen.wait() you can just do infinite loop, because process will exit in signal handler.

Using DBus interface in Hexchat plugin prevents it from exiting

I am trying to write a Hexchat plugin in Python, which would start a server and then communicate with it using DBus and python-dbus library. Everything works fine, until I try to unload the plugin or close Hexchat (which unloads all plugins). The application freezes. It does not happen if I do not call any method using the DBus.
I tried to pinpoint the problem, so I have created a minimal example:
server.py
import dbus.service
from dbus.mainloop.glib import DBusGMainLoop
from gi.repository import GLib
class EchoService(dbus.service.Object):
def __init__(self):
DBusGMainLoop(set_as_default=True)
self.loop = GLib.MainLoop()
bus_name = dbus.service.BusName(name='com.skontar.Echo', bus=dbus.SessionBus())
super().__init__(conn=None, object_path='/com/skontar/Echo', bus_name=bus_name)
def run(self):
self.loop.run()
#dbus.service.method(dbus_interface='com.skontar.Echo', in_signature='', out_signature='')
def quit(self):
self.loop.quit()
#dbus.service.method(dbus_interface='com.skontar.Echo', in_signature='s', out_signature='s')
def echo(self, text):
print(text)
return 'ACK'
EchoService().run()
dbus_plugin_unload_test.py
import subprocess
import time
import dbus
import hexchat
__module_name__ = 'dbus_plugin_unload_test'
__module_description__ = 'TBD'
__module_version__ = '1.0'
def get_dbus_interface():
session_bus = dbus.SessionBus()
dbus_object = session_bus.get_object(bus_name='com.skontar.Echo',
object_path='/com/skontar/Echo')
interface = dbus.Interface(object=dbus_object, dbus_interface='com.skontar.Echo')
return interface
def unload(userdata):
hexchat.prnt('Unloading {}, version {}'.format(__module_name__, __module_version__))
global interface
interface.quit()
time.sleep(1)
# raise Exception
hexchat.prnt('Loading {}, version {}'.format(__module_name__, __module_version__))
subprocess.Popen('python3 /home/skontar/Python/Examples/DBus/server.py', shell=True)
time.sleep(1)
interface = get_dbus_interface()
time.sleep(1)
interface.echo('TEST')
hexchat.hook_unload(unload)
In this example, everything works. When I try to unload the plugin or close Hexchat, server exits (so the .quit call works), but Hexchat hangs.
If I comment out both interface.echo('TEST') and interface.quit() it unloads fine, but also the plugin does not do anything useful. I have also found that if I raise Exception at the end of unload callback, everything closes "correctly", nothing hangs.
I am thinking that maybe I am supposed to do some DBus cleanup? Or am I missing some nuance of Hexchat plugin system? If I try the same with regular Python code outside the plugin system, both server and client exit just fine.

python daemon thread exits but process still run in the background

I am using python 2.7 and Python thread doesn't kill its process after the main program exits. (checking this with the ps -ax command on ubuntu machine)
I have the below thread class,
import os
import threading
class captureLogs(threading.Thread):
'''
initialize the constructor
'''
def __init__(self, deviceIp, fileTag):
threading.Thread.__init__(self)
super(captureLogs, self).__init__()
self._stop = threading.Event()
self.deviceIp = deviceIp
self.fileTag = fileTag
def stop(self):
self._stop.set()
def stopped(self):
return self._stop.isSet()
'''
define the run method
'''
def run(self):
'''
Make the thread capture logs
'''
cmdTorun = "adb logcat > " + self.deviceIp +'_'+self.fileTag+'.log'
os.system(cmdTorun)
And I am creating a thread in another file sample.py,
import logCapture
import os
import time
c = logCapture.captureLogs('100.21.143.168','somefile')
c.setDaemon(True)
c.start()
print "Started the log capture. now sleeping. is this a dameon?", c.isDaemon()
time.sleep(5)
print "Sleep tiime is over"
c.stop()
print "Calling stop was successful:", c.stopped()
print "Thread is now completed and main program exiting"
I get the below output from the command line:
Started the log capture. now sleeping. is this a dameon? True
Sleep tiime is over
Calling stop was successful: True
Thread is now completed and main program exiting
And the sample.py exits.
But when I use below command on a terminal,
ps -ax | grep "adb"
I still see the process running. (I am killing them manually now using the kill -9 17681 17682)
Not sure what I am missing here.
My question is,
1) why is the process still alive when I already killed it in my program?
2) Will it create any problem if I don't bother about it?
3) is there any other better way to capture logs using a thread and monitor the logs?
EDIT: As suggested by #bug Killer, I added the below method in my thread class,
def getProcessID(self):
return os.getpid()
and used os.kill(c.getProcessID(), SIGTERM) in my sample.py . The program doesn't exit at all.
It is likely because you are using os.system in your thread. The spawned process from os.system will stay alive even after the thread is killed. Actually, it will stay alive forever unless you explicitly terminate it in your code or by hand (which it sounds like you are doing ultimately) or the spawned process exits on its own. You can do this instead:
import atexit
import subprocess
deviceIp = '100.21.143.168'
fileTag = 'somefile'
# this is spawned in the background, so no threading code is needed
cmdTorun = "adb logcat > " + deviceIp +'_'+fileTag+'.log'
proc = subprocess.Popen(cmdTorun, shell=True)
# or register proc.kill if you feel like living on the edge
atexit.register(proc.terminate)
# Here is where all the other awesome code goes
Since all you are doing is spawning a process, creating a thread to do it is overkill and only complicates your program logic. Just spawn the process in the background as shown above and then let atexit terminate it when your program exits. And/or call proc.terminate explicitly; it should be fine to call repeatedly (much like close on a file object) so having atexit call it again later shouldn't hurt anything.

Trapping and handling taskkill in Windows Python

I am using Python 2.6.6 for Windows (on Windows XP SP3) with pywin32-218.
In my Python application, I have a second thread (apart from the main thread) which spawns a subprocess to run another Windows executable.
My problem is that when the main process (python.exe) is killed (e.g. using taskkill), I want to terminate the subprocess (calc.exe) and perform some cleaning up.
I tried various methods (atexit, signal and win32api.handleConsoleCtrl), but none seem to be able to trap the taskkill signal.
My code as follows (test.py):
import sys
import os
import signal
import win32api
import atexit
import time
import threading
import subprocess
class SecondThread(threading.Thread):
def __init__(self):
threading.Thread.__init__(self)
self.secondProcess = None
def run(self):
secondCommand = ['C:\WINDOWS\system32\calc.exe']
self.secondProcess = subprocess.Popen(secondCommand)
print 'calc.exe running'
self.secondProcess.wait()
print 'calc.exe stopped'
# do cleanup here
def stop(self):
if self.secondProcess and self.secondProcess.returncode == None:
self.secondProcess.kill()
secondThread = SecondThread()
def main():
secondThread.start()
def cleanup():
print 'cleaning up'
secondThread.stop()
print 'cleaned up'
atexit.register(cleanup)
def handleSignal(signalNum, frame):
print 'handleSignal'
cleanup()
sys.exit(0)
for signalNum in (signal.SIGINT, signal.SIGILL, signal.SIGABRT, signal.SIGFPE, signal.SIGSEGV, signal.SIGTERM):
signal.signal(signalNum, handleSignal)
def handleConsoleCtrl(signalNum):
print ('handleConsoleCtrl')
cleanup()
win32api.SetConsoleCtrlHandler(handleConsoleCtrl, True)
main()
The application is launched using
python.exe test.py
The console then prints "calc.exe running", and the Calculator application runs, and using Process Explorer, I can see calc.exe as a sub-process of python.exe
Then I kill the main process using
taskkill /pid XXXX /f
(where XXXX is the PID for python.exe)
What happens after this is that the command prompt returns without further output (i.e. none of "cleaning up", "handleSignal" or "handleConsoleCtrl" gets printed), the Calculator application continues running, and from Process Explorer, python.exe is no longer running but calc.exe has re-parented itself.
Taskkill (normally) sends WM_CLOSE. If your application is console only and has no window, while you can get CTRL_CLOSE_EVENT via a handler set by SetConsoleCtrlHandler (which happens if your controlling terminal window is closed) you can't receive a bare WM_CLOSE message.
If you have to stick with taskkill (rather than using a different program to send a Ctrl-C) one solution is to set the aforementioned handler and ensure your application has its own terminal window (e.g. by usingstart.exe "" <yourprog> to invoke it). See https://stackoverflow.com/a/23197789/4513656 for details an alternatives.

Sending ^C to Python subprocess objects on Windows

I have a test harness (written in Python) that needs to shut down the program under test (written in C) by sending it ^C. On Unix,
proc.send_signal(signal.SIGINT)
works perfectly. On Windows, that throws an error ("signal 2 is not supported" or something like that). I am using Python 2.7 for Windows, so I have the impression that I should be able to do instead
proc.send_signal(signal.CTRL_C_EVENT)
but this doesn't do anything at all. What do I have to do? This is the code that creates the subprocess:
# Windows needs an extra argument passed to subprocess.Popen,
# but the constant isn't defined on Unix.
try: kwargs['creationflags'] = subprocess.CREATE_NEW_PROCESS_GROUP
except AttributeError: pass
proc = subprocess.Popen(argv,
stdin=open(os.path.devnull, "r"),
stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
stderr=subprocess.PIPE,
**kwargs)
There is a solution by using a wrapper (as described in the link Vinay provided) which is started in a new console window with the Windows start command.
Code of the wrapper:
#wrapper.py
import subprocess, time, signal, sys, os
def signal_handler(signal, frame):
time.sleep(1)
print 'Ctrl+C received in wrapper.py'
signal.signal(signal.SIGINT, signal_handler)
print "wrapper.py started"
subprocess.Popen("python demo.py")
time.sleep(3) #Replace with your IPC code here, which waits on a fire CTRL-C request
os.kill(signal.CTRL_C_EVENT, 0)
Code of the program catching CTRL-C:
#demo.py
import signal, sys, time
def signal_handler(signal, frame):
print 'Ctrl+C received in demo.py'
time.sleep(1)
sys.exit(0)
signal.signal(signal.SIGINT, signal_handler)
print 'demo.py started'
#signal.pause() # does not work under Windows
while(True):
time.sleep(1)
Launch the wrapper like e.g.:
PythonPrompt> import subprocess
PythonPrompt> subprocess.Popen("start python wrapper.py", shell=True)
You need to add some IPC code which allows you to control the wrapper firing the os.kill(signal.CTRL_C_EVENT, 0) command. I used sockets for this purpose in my application.
Explanation:
Preinformation
send_signal(CTRL_C_EVENT) does not work because CTRL_C_EVENT is only for os.kill. [REF1]
os.kill(CTRL_C_EVENT) sends the signal to all processes running in the current cmd window [REF2]
Popen(..., creationflags=CREATE_NEW_PROCESS_GROUP) does not work because CTRL_C_EVENT is ignored for process groups. [REF2]
This is a bug in the python documentation [REF3]
Implemented solution
Let your program run in a different cmd window with the Windows shell command start.
Add a CTRL-C request wrapper between your control application and the application which should get the CTRL-C signal. The wrapper will run in the same cmd window as the application which should get the CTRL-C signal.
The wrapper will shutdown itself and the program which should get the CTRL-C signal by sending all processes in the cmd window the CTRL_C_EVENT.
The control program should be able to request the wrapper to send the CTRL-C signal. This might be implemnted trough IPC means, e.g. sockets.
Helpful posts were:
I had to remove the http in front of the links because I'm a new user and are not allowed to post more than two links.
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/windowsgeneraldevelopmentissues/thread/dc9586ab-1ee8-41aa-a775-cf4828ac1239/#6589714f-12a7-447e-b214-27372f31ca11
Can I send a ctrl-C (SIGINT) to an application on Windows?
Sending SIGINT to a subprocess of python
http://bugs.python.org/issue9524
http://ss64.com/nt/start.html
http://objectmix.com/python/387639-sending-cntrl-c.html#post1443948
Update: IPC based CTRL-C Wrapper
Here you can find a selfwritten python module providing a CTRL-C wrapping including a socket based IPC.
The syntax is quite similiar to the subprocess module.
Usage:
>>> import winctrlc
>>> p1 = winctrlc.Popen("python demo.py")
>>> p2 = winctrlc.Popen("python demo.py")
>>> p3 = winctrlc.Popen("python demo.py")
>>> p2.send_ctrl_c()
>>> p1.send_ctrl_c()
>>> p3.send_ctrl_c()
Code
import socket
import subprocess
import time
import random
import signal, os, sys
class Popen:
_port = random.randint(10000, 50000)
_connection = ''
def _start_ctrl_c_wrapper(self, cmd):
cmd_str = "start \"\" python winctrlc.py "+"\""+cmd+"\""+" "+str(self._port)
subprocess.Popen(cmd_str, shell=True)
def _create_connection(self):
self._connection = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
self._connection.connect(('localhost', self._port))
def send_ctrl_c(self):
self._connection.send(Wrapper.TERMINATION_REQ)
self._connection.close()
def __init__(self, cmd):
self._start_ctrl_c_wrapper(cmd)
self._create_connection()
class Wrapper:
TERMINATION_REQ = "Terminate with CTRL-C"
def _create_connection(self, port):
s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
s.bind(('localhost', port))
s.listen(1)
conn, addr = s.accept()
return conn
def _wait_on_ctrl_c_request(self, conn):
while True:
data = conn.recv(1024)
if data == self.TERMINATION_REQ:
ctrl_c_received = True
break
else:
ctrl_c_received = False
return ctrl_c_received
def _cleanup_and_fire_ctrl_c(self, conn):
conn.close()
os.kill(signal.CTRL_C_EVENT, 0)
def _signal_handler(self, signal, frame):
time.sleep(1)
sys.exit(0)
def __init__(self, cmd, port):
signal.signal(signal.SIGINT, self._signal_handler)
subprocess.Popen(cmd)
conn = self._create_connection(port)
ctrl_c_req_received = self._wait_on_ctrl_c_request(conn)
if ctrl_c_req_received:
self._cleanup_and_fire_ctrl_c(conn)
else:
sys.exit(0)
if __name__ == "__main__":
command_string = sys.argv[1]
port_no = int(sys.argv[2])
Wrapper(command_string, port_no)
New answer:
When you create the process, use the flag CREATE_NEW_PROCESS_GROUP. And then you can send CTRL_BREAK to the child process. The default behavior is the same as CTRL_C, except that it won't affect the calling process.
Old answer:
My solution also involves a wrapper script, but it does not need IPC, so it is far simpler to use.
The wrapper script first detaches itself from any existing console, then attach to the target console, then files the Ctrl-C event.
import ctypes
import sys
kernel = ctypes.windll.kernel32
pid = int(sys.argv[1])
kernel.FreeConsole()
kernel.AttachConsole(pid)
kernel.SetConsoleCtrlHandler(None, 1)
kernel.GenerateConsoleCtrlEvent(0, 0)
sys.exit(0)
The initial process must be launched in a separate console so that the Ctrl-C event will not leak. Example
p = subprocess.Popen(['some_command'], creationflags=subprocess.CREATE_NEW_CONSOLE)
# Do something else
subprocess.check_call([sys.executable, 'ctrl_c.py', str(p.pid)]) # Send Ctrl-C
where I named the wrapper script as ctrl_c.py.
Try calling the GenerateConsoleCtrlEvent function using ctypes. As you are creating a new process group, the process group ID should be the same as the pid. So, something like
import ctypes
ctypes.windll.kernel32.GenerateConsoleCtrlEvent(0, proc.pid) # 0 => Ctrl-C
should work.
Update: You're right, I missed that part of the detail. Here's a post which suggests a possible solution, though it's a bit kludgy. More details are in this answer.
Here is a fully working example which doesn't need any modification in the target script.
This overrides the sitecustomize module so it might no be suitable for every scenario. However, in this case you could use a *.pth file in site-packages to execute code at the subprocess startup (see https://nedbatchelder.com/blog/201001/running_code_at_python_startup.html).
Edit This works only out of the box for subprocesses in Python. Other processes have to manually call SetConsoleCtrlHandler(NULL, FALSE).
main.py
import os
import signal
import subprocess
import sys
import time
def main():
env = os.environ.copy()
env['PYTHONPATH'] = '%s%s%s' % ('custom-site', os.pathsep,
env.get('PYTHONPATH', ''))
proc = subprocess.Popen(
[sys.executable, 'sub.py'],
env=env,
creationflags=subprocess.CREATE_NEW_PROCESS_GROUP,
)
time.sleep(1)
proc.send_signal(signal.CTRL_C_EVENT)
proc.wait()
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
custom-site\sitecustomize.py
import ctypes
import sys
kernel32 = ctypes.WinDLL('kernel32', use_last_error=True)
if not kernel32.SetConsoleCtrlHandler(None, False):
print('SetConsoleCtrlHandler Error: ', ctypes.get_last_error(),
file=sys.stderr)
sub.py
import atexit
import time
def cleanup():
print ('cleanup')
atexit.register(cleanup)
while True:
time.sleep(1)
I have a single file solution with the following advantages:
- No external libraries. (Other than ctypes)
- Doesn't require the process to be opened in a specific way.
The solution is adapted from this stack overflow post, but I think it's much more elegant in python.
import os
import signal
import subprocess
import sys
import time
# Terminates a Windows console app sending Ctrl-C
def terminateConsole(processId: int, timeout: int = None) -> bool:
currentFilePath = os.path.abspath(__file__)
# Call the below code in a separate process. This is necessary due to the FreeConsole call.
try:
code = subprocess.call('{} {} {}'.format(sys.executable, currentFilePath, processId), timeout=timeout)
if code == 0: return True
except subprocess.TimeoutExpired:
pass
# Backup plan
subprocess.call('taskkill /F /PID {}'.format(processId))
if __name__ == '__main__':
pid = int(sys.argv[1])
import ctypes
kernel = ctypes.windll.kernel32
r = kernel.FreeConsole()
if r == 0: exit(-1)
r = kernel.AttachConsole(pid)
if r == 0: exit(-1)
r = kernel.SetConsoleCtrlHandler(None, True)
if r == 0: exit(-1)
r = kernel.GenerateConsoleCtrlEvent(0, 0)
if r == 0: exit(-1)
r = kernel.FreeConsole()
if r == 0: exit(-1)
# use tasklist to wait while the process is still alive.
while True:
time.sleep(1)
# We pass in stdin as PIPE because there currently is no Console, and stdin is currently invalid.
searchOutput: bytes = subprocess.check_output('tasklist /FI "PID eq {}"'.format(pid), stdin=subprocess.PIPE)
if str(pid) not in searchOutput.decode(): break;
# The following two commands are not needed since we're about to close this script.
# You can leave them here if you want to do more console operations.
r = kernel.SetConsoleCtrlHandler(None, False)
if r == 0: exit(-1)
r = kernel.AllocConsole()
if r == 0: exit(-1)
exit(0)
For those interested in a "quick fix", I've made a console-ctrl package based on Siyuan Ren's answer to make it even easier to use.
Simply run pip install console-ctrl, and in your code:
import console_ctrl
import subprocess
# Start some command IN A SEPARATE CONSOLE
p = subprocess.Popen(['some_command'], creationflags=subprocess.CREATE_NEW_CONSOLE)
# ...
# Stop the target process
console_ctrl.send_ctrl_c(p.pid)
I have been trying this but for some reason ctrl+break works, and ctrl+c does not. So using os.kill(signal.CTRL_C_EVENT, 0) fails, but doing os.kill(signal.CTRL_C_EVENT, 1) works. I am told this has something to do with the create process owner being the only one that can pass a ctrl c? Does that make sense?
To clarify, while running fio manually in a command window it appears to be running as expected. Using the CTRL + BREAK breaks without storing the log as expected and CTRL + C finishes writing to the file also as expected. The problem appears to be in the signal for the CTRL_C_EVENT.
It almost appears to be a bug in Python but may rather be a bug in Windows. Also one other thing, I had a cygwin version running and sending the ctrl+c in python there worked as well, but then again we aren't really running native windows there.
example:
import subprocess, time, signal, sys, os
command = '"C:\\Program Files\\fio\\fio.exe" --rw=randrw --bs=1M --numjobs=8 --iodepth=64 --direct=1 ' \
'--sync=0 --ioengine=windowsaio --name=test --loops=10000 ' \
'--size=99901800 --rwmixwrite=100 --do_verify=0 --filename=I\\:\\test ' \
'--thread --output=C:\\output.txt'
def signal_handler(signal, frame):
time.sleep(1)
print 'Ctrl+C received in wrapper.py'
signal.signal(signal.SIGINT, signal_handler)
print 'command Starting'
subprocess.Popen(command)
print 'command started'
time.sleep(15)
print 'Timeout Completed'
os.kill(signal.CTRL_C_EVENT, 0)
(This was supposed to be a comment under Siyuan Ren's answer but I don't have enough rep so here's a slightly longer version.)
If you don't want to create any helper scripts you can use:
p = subprocess.Popen(['some_command'], creationflags=subprocess.CREATE_NEW_CONSOLE)
# Do something else
subprocess.run([
sys.executable,
"-c",
"import ctypes, sys;"
"kernel = ctypes.windll.kernel32;"
"pid = int(sys.argv[1]);"
"kernel.FreeConsole();"
"kernel.AttachConsole(pid);"
"kernel.SetConsoleCtrlHandler(None, 1);"
"kernel.GenerateConsoleCtrlEvent(0, 0);"
"sys.exit(0)",
str(p.pid)
]) # Send Ctrl-C
But it won't work if you use PyInstaller - sys.executable points to your executable, not the Python interpreter. To solve that issue I've created a tiny utility for Windows: https://github.com/anadius/ctrlc
Now you can send the Ctrl+C event with:
subprocess.run(["ctrlc", str(p.pid)])

Categories

Resources