Im writing simple blogging platform in Flask microframework, and I'd like to allow users to change image on the front page but without actually writing it into filesystem. Is it possible to point src attribute in img tag to an object stored in memory?
Yes, you can do it.
Create a controller or serlvet called for example
www.yoursite.com/getImage/ID
When you execute this URL, your
program shoud connect to the memcached and return the image object
that you have previously stored in it.
Finally when in your html you add: src="www.yoursite.com/getImage/ID" the browser will execute
this url, but instead of reading a file from disk it will ask the memcached for the specific ID.
Be sure to add the correct content-type in your response from the server in order that the browser understand that you are sending an image content.
Fer
Related
My use case is I have a flaskapp running
The idea is it'll just display a static page (currently using PySimpleGUI) and upon receiving the information sent from the other computer (such as the name for e.g.) then it'll show the name as a QR code. (so perhaps a constant refresh on the GUI and changing upon receiving the data)
The code setup is this way currently
#app.route('/qrcode', methods=['GET'])
def displayQrCode():
args = request.args
name = args.get('name') #
try:
img = qrcode.make(name)
img.save('checkin-qrcode.png')
# Display QR Code
qrWindowThread = threading.Thread(target=qrCodeWindowShow)
qrWindowThread.start()
print(name)
return 'Success'
except RuntimeError:
return 'Error in GET'
However, being new to Flask i am not sure how to send a string from a separate computer running jupyter notebook to this Flask app. Online tutorials show like having a form field page but i wish to not have an user input.
So for instance if the jupyter notebook code sends a post request to the ipaddress:5000 it should ideally show (correct me here: ipaddress:5000/qrcode?name=JohnDoe)
so the flask app would retrieve this JohnDoe and display it as a QR code. I can hardcode or manually access this page but how would i have it 'listen' to this /qrcode and then Get the value when it's sent. Or am i misunderstanding it all and I need to do it via another way?
EDIT:
Alright third time lucky, I think I understand what you want now. So your use case is a first computer that is displaying a GUI and running a flask server with an route that can take in a string.
There's a second computer that can send a http request to that route with a name and when that happens you want the GUI on the first computer to refresh to display a QR code of the name.
I'd solve this by having the qrcode route write that name to persistent storage. Could be anything sqlite db, an environment variable, a string in a file.
The first computer running the PySimpleGUI interface poles this persistent storage for changes, and if it sees a change then it renders a new QR code for that name and displays it.
There are multiple ways available to do that:
REST API integration
Realtime data transmission using tornado or ??
Through a base origin for data transmission
Hope you get help with this.
I have a website (managed with python-flask) with images on canvas and i would like to pass the content of those canvas to another python script as images.
The other python script is using openCV in order to perform face detection.
I know i could upload the image on my server and then read the file on my opencv application but i would like not to save any data on my server.
Do you have any ideas ?
You anyway should upload file to the server, because you need to transfer user's data to your server application.
But instead of saving it as a regular file, you could use someting like SpooledTemporaryFile
In other words, you'll have workflow like this:
Send image with POST to the server;
Read file from POST request with flask;
Write it to SpooledTemporaryFile and receive a file-like object;
Use that file-like object for OpenCV
I want to connect to a mySQL database with python, then query a number corresponding to an image, and load this image in Qt. From what I found online, it is suggested not to use mysql database to store the image, but instead store a file location on the server. If this is the case, can I load the image (do i have to download it?) into qt using mysql or do i have to open another connection with ftp, download the image to a folder, and then load it with qt? If there are any resources on this type of workflow I would appreciate it.
You don't need to download the file using FTP (or the like) to load it into Qt.
Assuming the database stores the correct file path to the image, you can just use the same functionality once you get the file path, i.e. you anyway only need the file path to load the image into Qt. There is nothing special you would do by downloading the image itself.
If the database is on a remote server, a possible approach is to use the JDBC API to access the database, get the image as a binary file and then serialize it, which can be transferred over the network.
I'm looking for a way to sell someone a card at an event that will have a unique code that they will be able to use later in order to download a file (mp3, pdf, etc.) only one time and mask the true file location so a savvy person downloading the file won't be able to download the file more than once. It would be nice to host the file on Amazon S3 to save on bandwidth where our server is co-located.
My thought for the codes would be to pre-generate the unique codes that will get printed on the cards and store those in a database that could also have a field that stores the number of times the file was downloaded. This way we could set how many attempts we would allow the user for downloading the file.
The part that I need direction on is how do I hide/mask the original file location so people can't steal that url and then download the file as many times as they want. I've done Google searches and I'm either not searching using the right keywords or there aren't very many libraries or snippets out there already for this type of thing.
I'm guessing that I might be able to rig something up using django.views.static.serve that acts as a sort of proxy between the actual file and the user downloading the file. The only drawback to this method I would think is that I would need to use the actual web server and wouldn't be able to store the file on Amazon S3.
Any suggestions or thoughts are greatly appreciated.
Neat idea. However, I would warn against the single-download method, because there is no guarantee that their first download attempt will be successful. Perhaps use a time-expiration method instead?
But it is certainly possible to do this with Django. Here is an outline of the basic approach:
Set up a django url for serving these files
Use a GET parameter which is a unique string to identify which file to get.
Keep a database table which has a FileField for the file to download. This table maps the unique strings to the location of the file on the file system.
To serve the file as a download, set the response headers in the view like this:
(path is the location of the file to serve)
with open(path, 'rb') as f:
response = HttpResponse(f.read())
response['Content-Type'] = 'application/octet-stream';
response['Content-Disposition'] = 'attachment; filename="%s"' % 'insert_filename_here'
return response
Since we are using this Django page to serve the file, the user cannot find out the original file location.
You can just use something simple such as mod_xsendfile. This functionality is also available in other popular webservers such lighttpd or nginx.
It works like this: when enabled your application (e.g. a trivial PHP script) can send a special response header, causing the webserver to serve a static file.
If you want it to work with S3 you will need to handle each and every request this way, meaning the traffic will go through your site, from there to AWS, back to your site and back to the client. Does S3 support symbolic links / aliases? If so you might just redirect a valid user to one of the symbolic URLs and delete that symlink after a couple of hours.
I am using this file storage engine to store files to Amazon S3 when they are uploaded:
http://code.welldev.org/django-storages/wiki/Home
It takes quite a long time to upload because the file must first be uploaded from client to web server, and then web server to Amazon S3 before a response is returned to the client.
I would like to make the process of sending the file to S3 asynchronous, so the response can be returned to the user much faster. What is the best way to do this with the file storage engine?
Thanks for your advice!
I've taken another approach to this problem.
My models have 2 file fields, one uses the standard file storage backend and the other one uses the s3 file storage backend. When the user uploads a file it get's stored localy.
I have a management command in my application that uploads all the localy stored files to s3 and updates the models.
So when a request comes for the file I check to see if the model object uses the s3 storage field, if so I send a redirect to the correct url on s3, if not I send a redirect so that nginx can serve the file from disk.
This management command can ofcourse be triggered by any event a cronjob or whatever.
It's possible to have your users upload files directly to S3 from their browser using a special form (with an encrypted policy document in a hidden field). They will be redirected back to your application once the upload completes.
More information here: http://developer.amazonwebservices.com/connect/entry.jspa?externalID=1434
There is an app for that :-)
https://github.com/jezdez/django-queued-storage
It does exactly what you need - and much more, because you can set any "local" storage and any "remote" storage. This app will store your file in fast "local" storage (for example MogileFS storage) and then using Celery (django-celery), will attempt asynchronous uploading to the "remote" storage.
Few remarks:
The tricky thing is - you can setup it to copy&upload, or to upload&delete strategy, that will delete local file once it is uploaded.
Second tricky thing - it will serve file from "local" storage until it is not uploaded.
It also can be configured to make number of retries on uploads failures.
Installation & usage is also very simple and straightforward:
pip install django-queued-storage
append to INSTALLED_APPS:
INSTALLED_APPS += ('queued_storage',)
in models.py:
from queued_storage.backends import QueuedStorage
queued_s3storage = QueuedStorage(
'django.core.files.storage.FileSystemStorage',
'storages.backends.s3boto.S3BotoStorage', task='queued_storage.tasks.TransferAndDelete')
class MyModel(models.Model):
my_file = models.FileField(upload_to='files', storage=queued_s3storage)
You could decouple the process:
the user selects file to upload and sends it to your server. After this he sees a page "Thank you for uploading foofile.txt, it is now stored in our storage backend"
When the users has uploaded the file it is stored temporary directory on your server and, if needed, some metadata is stored in your database.
A background process on your server then uploads the file to S3. This would only possible if you have full access to your server so you can create some kind of "deamon" to to this (or simply use a cronjob).*
The page that is displayed polls asynchronously and displays some kind of progress bar to the user (or s simple "please wait" Message. This would only be needed if the user should be able to "use" (put it in a message, or something like that) it directly after uploading.
[*: In case you have only a shared hosting you could possibly build some solution which uses an hidden Iframe in the users browser to start a script which then uploads the file to S3]
You can directly upload media to the s3 server without using your web application server.
See the following references:
Amazon API Reference : http://docs.amazonwebservices.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/index.html?UsingHTTPPOST.html
A django implementation : https://github.com/sbc/django-uploadify-s3
As some of the answers here suggest uploading directly to S3, here's a Django S3 Mixin using plupload:
https://github.com/burgalon/plupload-s3mixin
I encountered the same issue with uploaded images. You cannot pass along files to a Celery worker because Celery needs to be able to pickle the arguments to a task. My solution was to deconstruct the image data into a string and get all other info from the file, passing this data and info to the task, where I reconstructed the image. After that you can save it, which will send it to your storage backend (such as S3). If you want to associate the image with a model, just pass along the id of the instance to the task and retrieve it there, bind the image to the instance and save the instance.
When a file has been uploaded via a form, it is available in your view as a UploadedFile file-like object. You can get it directly out of request.FILES, or better first bind it to your form, run is_valid and retrieve the file-like object from form.cleaned_data. At that point at least you know it is the kind of file you want it to be. After that you can get the data using read(), and get the other info using other methods/attributes. See https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.4/topics/http/file-uploads/
I actually ended up writing and distributing a little package to save an image asyncly. Have a look at https://github.com/gterzian/django_async Right it's just for images and you could fork it and add functionalities for your situation. I'm using it with https://github.com/duointeractive/django-athumb and S3