Develop Reference

Unit testing that a method was called in another object's method in Python

Most of my unit testing experience is with Java and now I'm turning to Python. I need to test whether a method (from object B) gets called inside another method (in object A).
In Java the test method would have to pass a mock or spy version of B to A's constructor to be used when the B method is invoked. Do I need to do the same in Python? Or is there a simpler way? (I raise the possibility of the latter, because it seems, from what little I know, that Python is relatively relaxed about enforcing isolation between different components.)
Below is how I do this the "Java way." There are two Python files under test (for objects A and B) and a test program. Notice that object A's constructor had to be modified to accommodate testing.
obj_a.py
from obj_b import *
class ObjA:
def __init__(self, *args):
if len(args) > 0:
self.objb = args[0] # for testing
return
self.objb = ObjB()
def methodCallsB(self, x, y):
return self.objb.add(x, y)
obj_b.py
class ObjB:
def add(self, x, y):
return x + y
test.py
import unittest
from unittest.mock import patch, Mock
from obj_a import *
from obj_b import *
class TTest(unittest.TestCase):
#patch("obj_b.ObjB")
def test_shouldCallBThroughA(self, mockB):
# configure mock
mockB.add = Mock(return_value=137)
obja = ObjA(mockB)
# invoke test method
res = obja.methodCallsB(4, 7)
print("result: " + str(res))
# assess results
self.assertEqual(137, res)
mockB.add.assert_called_once()
args = mockB.add.call_args[0] # Python 3.7
print("args: " + str(args))
self.assertEqual((4, 7), args)
if __name__ =='__main__':
unittest.main()
Again, is there a simpler way to test that ObjB::add is called from ObjA?

Apart from the possible problems with the design, mentioned in the comment by #Alex, there is a couple of errors in using the mock.
First, you are mocking the wrong object. As in object_a you do from obj_b import * (which is bad style by the way - only import the objects you need), you need to patch the object reference imported into obj_b, e.g. obj_a.ObjB (see where to patch).
Second, you have to mock the method call on the instance instead of the class, e.g. mock mockB.return_value.add instead of mockB.add.
Your tests actually only work because you are not testing your real function, only your mock. If you do the patching correctly, there is no need to add that test-specific code in __init__.
So, put together, something like this should work:
obj_a.py
class ObjA:
def __init__(self):
self.objb = ObjB()
...
test.py
class TTest(unittest.TestCase):
#patch("obj_a.ObjB")
def test_shouldCallBThroughA(self, mockB):
# for convenience, store the mocked method
mocked_add = mockB.return_value.add
mocked_add.return_value = 137
obja = ObjA()
res = obja.methodCallsB(4, 7)
self.assertEqual(137, res)
mocked_add.assert_called_once()
args = mocked_add.call_args[0]
self.assertEqual((4, 7), args)

Reset class and class variables for each test in Python via pytest

I created a class to make my life easier while doing some integration tests involving workers and their contracts. The code looks like this:
class ContractID(str):
contract_counter = 0
contract_list = list()
def __new__(cls):
cls.contract_counter += 1
new_entry = super().__new__(cls, f'Some_internal_name-{cls.contract_counter:10d}')
cls.contract_list.append(new_entry)
return new_entry
#classmethod
def get_contract_no(cls, worker_number):
return cls.contract_list[worker_number-1] # -1 so WORKER1 has contract #1 and not #0 etc.
When I'm unit-testing the class, I'm using the following code:
from test_helpers import ContractID
#pytest.fixture
def get_contract_numbers():
test_string_1 = ContractID()
test_string_2 = ContractID()
test_string_3 = ContractID()
return test_string_1, test_string_2, test_string_3
def test_contract_id(get_contract_numbers):
assert get_contract_ids[0] == 'Some_internal_name-0000000001'
assert get_contract_ids[1] == 'Some_internal_name-0000000002'
assert get_contract_ids[2] == 'Some_internal_name-0000000003'
def test_contract_id_get_contract_no(get_contract_numbers):
assert ContractID.get_contract_no(1) == 'Some_internal_name-0000000001'
assert ContractID.get_contract_no(2) == 'Some_internal_name-0000000002'
assert ContractID.get_contract_no(3) == 'Some_internal_name-0000000003'
with pytest.raises(IndexError) as py_e:
ContractID.get_contract_no(4)
assert py_e.type == IndexError
However, when I try to run these tests, the second one (test_contract_id_get_contract_no) fails, because it does not raise the error as there are more than three values. Furthermore, when I try to run all my tests in my folder test/, it fails even the first test (test_contract_id), which is probably because I'm trying to use this function in other tests that run before this test.
After reading this book, my understanding of fixtures was that it provides objects as if they were never called before, which is obviously not the case here. Is there a way how to tell the tests to use the class as if it hasn't been used before anywhere else?

If I understand that correctly, you want to run the fixture as setup code, so that your class has exactly 3 instances. If the fixture is function-scoped (the default) it is indeed run before each test, which will each time create 3 new instances for your class. If you want to reset your class after the test, you have to do this yourself - there is no way pytest can guess what you want to do here.
So, a working solution would be something like this:
#pytest.fixture(autouse=True)
def get_contract_numbers():
test_string_1 = ContractID()
test_string_2 = ContractID()
test_string_3 = ContractID()
yield
ContractID.contract_counter = 0
ContractID.contract_list.clear()
def test_contract_id():
...
Note that I did not yield the test strings, as you don't need them in the shown tests - if you need them, you can yield them, of course. I also added autouse=True, which makes sense if you need this for all tests, so you don't have to reference the fixture in each test.
Another possibility would be to use a session-scoped fixture. In this case the setup would be done only once. If that is what you need, you can use this instead:
#pytest.fixture(autouse=True, scope="session")
def get_contract_numbers():
test_string_1 = ContractID()
test_string_2 = ContractID()
test_string_3 = ContractID()
yield

python unittest : Assert the sequence of method calls in unit test [duplicate]

I have three functions that I'm trying to test the call order of.
Let's say that in module module.py I have the following
# module.py
def a(*args):
# do the first thing
def b(*args):
# do a second thing
def c(*args):
# do a third thing
def main_routine():
a_args = ('a')
b_args = ('b')
c_args = ('c')
a(*a_args)
b(*b_args)
c(*c_args)
I want to check that b is called after a, and before c. So getting a mock for each of a, b and c is easy:
# tests.py
#mock.patch('module.a')
#mock.patch('module.b')
#mock.patch('module.c')
def test_main_routine(c_mock, b_mock, a_mock):
# test all the things here
Checking that each of the individial mocks are called is easy, too. How do I check the order of the calls relative to one another?
call_args_list won't work as it's maintained separately for each mock.
I've tried using a side effect to log each of the calls:
calls = []
def register_call(*args):
calls.append(mock.call(*args))
return mock.DEFAULT
a_mock.side_effect = register_call
b_mock.side_effect = register_call
c_mock.side_effect = register_call
But this only gives me the args that the mocks were called with, but not the actual mock that the call was made against. I can add a bit more logic:
# tests.py
from functools import partial
def register_call(*args, **kwargs):
calls.append(kwargs.pop('caller', None), mock.call(*args, **kwargs))
return mock.DEFAULT
a_mock.side_effect = partial(register_call, caller='a')
b_mock.side_effect = partial(register_call, caller='b')
c_mock.side_effect = partial(register_call, caller='c')
And that seems to get the job done... Is there a better way though? It feels like there should already be something in the API that can do this that I'm missing.

Define a Mock manager and attach mocks to it via attach_mock(). Then check for the mock_calls:
#patch('module.a')
#patch('module.b')
#patch('module.c')
def test_main_routine(c, b, a):
manager = Mock()
manager.attach_mock(a, 'a')
manager.attach_mock(b, 'b')
manager.attach_mock(c, 'c')
module.main_routine()
expected_calls = [call.a('a'), call.b('b'), call.c('c')]
assert manager.mock_calls == expected_calls
Just to test that it works, change the order of function calls in the main_routine() function add see that it throws AssertionError.
See more examples at Tracking order of calls and less verbose call assertions (link is dead; substitute: https://docs.python.org/3/library/unittest.mock.html#attaching-mocks-as-attributes)
Hope that helps.

I needed this answer today, but the example code in the question is really hard to read because the call args are the same as the names of the mocks on the manager and in the scope of the test. Here's the official documentation on this concept, and below is a clearer example for non-robots. All the modules I'm patching are made-up for the sake of the example:
#patch('module.file_reader')
#patch('module.json_parser')
#patch('module.calculator')
def test_main_routine(mock_calculator, mock_json_parser, mock_file_reader):
manager = Mock()
# First argument is the mock to attach to the manager.
# Second is the name for the field on the manager that holds the mock.
manager.attach_mock(mock_file_reader, 'the_mock_file_reader')
manager.attach_mock(mock_json_parser, 'the_mock_json_parser')
manager.attach_mock(mock_calculator, 'the_mock_calculator')
module.main_routine()
expected_calls = [
call.the_mock_file_reader('some file'),
call.the_mock_json_parser('some json'),
call.the_mock_calculator(1, 2)
]
assert manager.mock_calls == expected_calls
Note that you have to use attach_mock in this case because your mocks were created by patch. Mocks with names, including those created by patch, must be attached via attach_mock for this code to work. You don't have to use attach_mock if you make your own Mock objects without names:
def test_main_routine(mock_calculator, mock_json_parser, mock_file_reader):
manager = Mock()
mock_file_reader = Mock()
mock_json_parser = Mock()
mock_calculator = Mock()
manager.the_mock_file_reader = mock_file_reader
manager.the_mock_json_parser = mock_json_parser
manager.the_mock_calculator = mock_calculator
module.main_routine()
expected_calls = [
call.the_mock_file_reader('some file'),
call.the_mock_json_parser('some json'),
call.the_mock_calculator(1, 2)
]
assert manager.mock_calls == expected_calls
If you want a clear assertion failed message when the order or expected calls are missing, use the following assert line instead.
self.assertListEqual(manager.mock_calls, [
call.the_mock_file_reader('some file'),
call.the_mock_json_parser('some json'),
call.the_mock_calculator(1, 2)
])

A cleaner solution would be to wrap your functions into a class, then mock the class in the test. This will eliminate the need to do any patching (always a plus).
# module.py
class Wrapper:
def a(self, *args):
pass
def b(self, *args):
pass
def c(self, *args):
pass
def main_routine(self):
a_args = ('arg for a',)
b_args = ('arg for b',)
c_args = ('arg for c',)
self.a(*a_args)
self.b(*b_args)
self.c(*c_args)
In the test file, you create a mock wrapper class, then insert the mock wrapper in as the argument self when calling Wrapper.main_method (notice that this does not instantiate the class).
# module_test.py
from unittest.mock import MagicMock, call
from module import Wrapper
def test_main_routine():
mock_wrapper = MagicMock()
Wrapper.main_routine(mock_wrapper)
expected_calls = [call.a('arg for a'),
call.b('arg for b'),
call.c('arg for c')]
mock_wrapper.assert_has_calls(expected_calls)
Benefits:
No patching needed
In the test, you only need to type the name of the method being called once (instead of 2-3 times)
Uses assert_has_calls instead of comparing the mock_calls attribute to a list of calls.
Can be made into a general check_for_calls function (see below)
# module_better_test.py
from unittest.mock import MagicMock, call
from module import Wrapper
def test_main_routine():
expected_calls = [call.a('arg for a'),
call.b('arg for b'),
call.c('arg for c')]
check_for_calls('main_routine', expected_calls)
def check_for_calls(method, expected_calls):
mock_wrapper = MagicMock()
getattr(Wrapper, method)(mock_wrapper)
mock_wrapper.assert_has_calls(expected_calls)

How can I tell what function called my function? [duplicate]

Python: How to get the caller's method name in the called method?
Assume I have 2 methods:
def method1(self):
...
a = A.method2()
def method2(self):
...
If I don't want to do any change for method1, how to get the name of the caller (in this example, the name is method1) in method2?

inspect.getframeinfo and other related functions in inspect can help:
>>> import inspect
>>> def f1(): f2()
...
>>> def f2():
... curframe = inspect.currentframe()
... calframe = inspect.getouterframes(curframe, 2)
... print('caller name:', calframe[1][3])
...
>>> f1()
caller name: f1
this introspection is intended to help debugging and development; it's not advisable to rely on it for production-functionality purposes.

Shorter version:
import inspect
def f1(): f2()
def f2():
print 'caller name:', inspect.stack()[1][3]
f1()
(with thanks to #Alex, and Stefaan Lippen)

This seems to work just fine:
import sys
print sys._getframe().f_back.f_code.co_name

I would use inspect.currentframe().f_back.f_code.co_name. Its use hasn't been covered in any of the prior answers which are mainly of one of three types:
Some prior answers use inspect.stack but it's known to be too slow.
Some prior answers use sys._getframe which is an internal private function given its leading underscore, and so its use is implicitly discouraged.
One prior answer uses inspect.getouterframes(inspect.currentframe(), 2)[1][3] but it's entirely unclear what [1][3] is accessing.
import inspect
from types import FrameType
from typing import cast
def demo_the_caller_name() -> str:
"""Return the calling function's name."""
# Ref: https://stackoverflow.com/a/57712700/
return cast(FrameType, cast(FrameType, inspect.currentframe()).f_back).f_code.co_name
if __name__ == '__main__':
def _test_caller_name() -> None:
assert demo_the_caller_name() == '_test_caller_name'
_test_caller_name()
Note that cast(FrameType, frame) is used to satisfy mypy.
Acknowlegement: comment by 1313e for an answer.

I've come up with a slightly longer version that tries to build a full method name including module and class.
https://gist.github.com/2151727 (rev 9cccbf)
# Public Domain, i.e. feel free to copy/paste
# Considered a hack in Python 2
import inspect
def caller_name(skip=2):
"""Get a name of a caller in the format module.class.method
`skip` specifies how many levels of stack to skip while getting caller
name. skip=1 means "who calls me", skip=2 "who calls my caller" etc.
An empty string is returned if skipped levels exceed stack height
"""
stack = inspect.stack()
start = 0 + skip
if len(stack) < start + 1:
return ''
parentframe = stack[start][0]
name = []
module = inspect.getmodule(parentframe)
# `modname` can be None when frame is executed directly in console
# TODO(techtonik): consider using __main__
if module:
name.append(module.__name__)
# detect classname
if 'self' in parentframe.f_locals:
# I don't know any way to detect call from the object method
# XXX: there seems to be no way to detect static method call - it will
# be just a function call
name.append(parentframe.f_locals['self'].__class__.__name__)
codename = parentframe.f_code.co_name
if codename != '<module>': # top level usually
name.append( codename ) # function or a method
## Avoid circular refs and frame leaks
# https://docs.python.org/2.7/library/inspect.html#the-interpreter-stack
del parentframe, stack
return ".".join(name)

Bit of an amalgamation of the stuff above. But here's my crack at it.
def print_caller_name(stack_size=3):
def wrapper(fn):
def inner(*args, **kwargs):
import inspect
stack = inspect.stack()
modules = [(index, inspect.getmodule(stack[index][0]))
for index in reversed(range(1, stack_size))]
module_name_lengths = [len(module.__name__)
for _, module in modules]
s = '{index:>5} : {module:^%i} : {name}' % (max(module_name_lengths) + 4)
callers = ['',
s.format(index='level', module='module', name='name'),
'-' * 50]
for index, module in modules:
callers.append(s.format(index=index,
module=module.__name__,
name=stack[index][3]))
callers.append(s.format(index=0,
module=fn.__module__,
name=fn.__name__))
callers.append('')
print('\n'.join(callers))
fn(*args, **kwargs)
return inner
return wrapper
Use:
#print_caller_name(4)
def foo():
return 'foobar'
def bar():
return foo()
def baz():
return bar()
def fizz():
return baz()
fizz()
output is
level : module : name
--------------------------------------------------
3 : None : fizz
2 : None : baz
1 : None : bar
0 : __main__ : foo

You can use decorators, and do not have to use stacktrace
If you want to decorate a method inside a class
import functools
# outside ur class
def printOuterFunctionName(func):
#functools.wraps(func)
def wrapper(self):
print(f'Function Name is: {func.__name__}')
func(self)
return wrapper
class A:
#printOuterFunctionName
def foo():
pass
you may remove functools, self if it is procedural

An alternative to sys._getframe() is used by Python's Logging library to find caller information. Here's the idea:
raise an Exception
immediately catch it in an Except clause
use sys.exc_info to get Traceback frame (tb_frame).
from tb_frame get last caller's frame using f_back.
from last caller's frame get the code object that was being executed in that frame.
In our sample code it would be method1 (not method2) being executed.
From code object obtained, get the object's name -- this is caller method's name in our sample.
Here's the sample code to solve example in the question:
def method1():
method2()
def method2():
try:
raise Exception
except Exception:
frame = sys.exc_info()[2].tb_frame.f_back
print("method2 invoked by: ", frame.f_code.co_name)
# Invoking method1
method1()
Output:
method2 invoked by: method1
Frame has all sorts of details, including line number, file name, argument counts, argument type and so on. The solution works across classes and modules too.

Code:
#!/usr/bin/env python
import inspect
called=lambda: inspect.stack()[1][3]
def caller1():
print "inside: ",called()
def caller2():
print "inside: ",called()
if __name__=='__main__':
caller1()
caller2()
Output:
shahid#shahid-VirtualBox:~/Documents$ python test_func.py
inside: caller1
inside: caller2
shahid#shahid-VirtualBox:~/Documents$

I found a way if you're going across classes and want the class the method belongs to AND the method. It takes a bit of extraction work but it makes its point. This works in Python 2.7.13.
import inspect, os
class ClassOne:
def method1(self):
classtwoObj.method2()
class ClassTwo:
def method2(self):
curframe = inspect.currentframe()
calframe = inspect.getouterframes(curframe, 4)
print '\nI was called from', calframe[1][3], \
'in', calframe[1][4][0][6: -2]
# create objects to access class methods
classoneObj = ClassOne()
classtwoObj = ClassTwo()
# start the program
os.system('cls')
classoneObj.method1()

Hey mate I once made 3 methods without plugins for my app and maybe that can help you, It worked for me so maybe gonna work for you too.
def method_1(a=""):
if a == "method_2":
print("method_2")
if a == "method_3":
print("method_3")
def method_2():
method_1("method_2")
def method_3():
method_1("method_3")
method_2()

python mock global function that is used in class

I can't seem to get my head around mocking in Python. I have a global function:
a.py:
def has_permission(args):
ret_val = ...get-true-or-false...
return ret_val
b.py:
class MySerializer(HyperlinkedModelSerializer):
def get_fields():
fields = super().get_fields()
for f in :
if has_permission(...):
ret_val[f.name] = fields[f]
return ret_val
c.py:
class CountrySerializer(MySerializer):
class Meta:
model = Country
Question: Now i want to test c.py, but i want to mock the has_permission function that is defined in a.py, but is called in the get_fields-method of the class MySerializer that is defined in b.py ... How do i do that?
I've tried things like:
#patch('b.MySerializer.has_permission')
and
#patch('b.MySerializer.get_fields.has_permission')
and
#patch('a.has_permission')
But everything i try either just doesn't work and has_permission is still executed, or python complains about that it can't find the attribute 'has_permission'
with the patching done in:
test.py
class TestSerializerFields(TestCase):
#patch(... the above examples....)
def test_my_country_serializer():
s = CountrySerializer()
self..assertTrue(issubclass(my_serializer_fields.MyCharField, type(s.get_fields()['field1'])))

You need to patch the global in the b module:
#patch('b.has_permission')
because that's where your code looks for it.
Also see the Where to patch section of the mock documentation.

You need to patch the method where it exists at the time your test runs. If you try and patch the method where it is defined after the test code has already imported it, then the patch will have no effect. At the point where the #patch(...) executes, the test code under test has already grabbed the global method into its own module.
Here is an example:
app/util/config.py:
# This is the global method we want to mock
def is_search_enabled():
return True
app/service/searcher.py:
# Here is where that global method will be imported
# when this file is first imported
from app.util.config import is_search_enabled
class Searcher:
def __init__(self, api_service):
self._api_service = api_service
def search(self):
if not is_search_enabled():
return None
return self._api_service.perform_request('/search')
test/service/test_searcher.py:
from unittest.mock import patch, Mock
# The next line will cause the imports of `searcher.py` to execute...
from app.service.searcher import Searcher
# At this point, searcher.py has imported is_search_enabled into its module.
# If you later try and patch the method at its definition
# (app.util.config.is_search_enabled), it will have no effect because
# searcher.py won't look there again.
class MockApiService:
pass
class TestSearcher:
# By the time this executes, `is_search_enabled` has already been
# imported into `app.service.searcher`. So that is where we must
# patch it.
#patch('app.service.searcher.is_search_enabled')
def test_no_search_when_disabled(self, mock_is_search_enabled):
mock_is_search_enabled.return_value = False
mock_api_service = MockApiService()
mock_api_service.perform_request = Mock()
searcher = Searcher(mock_api_service)
results = searcher.search()
assert results is None
mock_api_service.perform_request.assert_not_called()
# (For completeness' sake, make sure the code actually works when search is enabled...)
def test_search(self):
mock_api_service = MockApiService()
mock_api_service.perform_request = mock_perform_request = Mock()
searcher = Searcher(mock_api_service)
expected_results = [1, 2, 3]
mock_perform_request.return_value = expected_results
actual_results = searcher.search()
assert actual_results == expected_results
mock_api_service.perform_request.assert_called_once_with('/search')