I usually use value_counts() to get the number of occurrences of a value. However, I deal now with large database-tables (cannot load it fully into RAM) and query the data in fractions of 1 month.
Is there a way to store the result of value_counts() and merge it with / add it to the next results?
I want to count the number user actions. Assume the following structure of
user-activity logs:
# month 1
id userId actionType
1 1 a
2 1 c
3 2 a
4 3 a
5 3 b
# month 2
id userId actionType
6 1 b
7 1 b
8 2 a
9 3 c
Using value_counts() on those produces:
# month 1
userId
1 2
2 1
3 2
# month 2
userId
1 2
2 1
3 1
Expected output:
# month 1+2
userId
1 4
2 2
3 3
Up until now, I just have found a method using groupby and sum:
# count users actions and remember them in new column
df1['count'] = df1.groupby(['userId'], sort=False)['id'].transform('count')
# delete not necessary columns
df1 = df1[['userId', 'count']]
# delete not necessary rows
df1 = df1.drop_duplicates(subset=['userId'])
# repeat
df2['count'] = df2.groupby(['userId'], sort=False)['id'].transform('count')
df2 = df2[['userId', 'count']]
df2 = df2.drop_duplicates(subset=['userId'])
# merge and sum up
print pd.concat([df1,df2]).groupby(['userId'], sort=False).sum()
What is the pythonic / pandas' way of merging the information of several series' (and dataframes) efficiently?
Let me suggest "add" and specify a fill value of 0. This has an advantage over the previously suggested answer in that it will work when the two Dataframes have non-identical sets of unique keys.
# Create frames
df1 = pd.DataFrame(
{'User_id': ['a', 'a', 'b', 'c', 'c', 'd'], 'a': [1, 1, 2, 3, 3, 5]})
df2 = pd.DataFrame(
{'User_id': ['a', 'a', 'b', 'b', 'c', 'c', 'c'], 'a': [1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4]})
Now add the the two sets of values_counts(). The fill_value argument will handle any NaN values that would arise, in this example, the 'd' that appears in df1, but not df2.
a = df1.User_id.value_counts()
b = df2.User_id.value_counts()
a.add(b,fill_value=0)
You can sum the series generated by the value_counts method directly:
#create frames
df= pd.DataFrame({'User_id': ['a','a','b','c','c'],'a':[1,1,2,3,3]})
df1= pd.DataFrame({'User_id': ['a','a','b','b','c','c','c'],'a':[1,1,2,2,3,3,4]})
sum the series:
df.User_id.value_counts() + df1.User_id.value_counts()
output:
a 4
b 3
c 5
dtype: int64
This is know as "Split-Apply-Combine". It is done in 1 line and 3-4 clicks, using a lambda function as follows.
1️⃣ paste this into your code:
df['total_for_this_label'] = df.groupby('label', as_index=False)['label'].transform(lambda x: x.count())
2️⃣ replace 3x label with the name of the column whose values you are counting (case-sensitive)
3️⃣ print df.head() to check it's worked correctly
Related
I have two dataframes with meaningless index's, but carefully curated order and I want to merge them while preserving that order. So, for example:
>>> df1
First
a 1
b 3
and
>>> df2
c 2
d 4
After merging, what I want to obtain is this:
>>> Desired_output
First Second
AnythingAtAll 1 2 # <--- Row Names are meaningless.
SeriouslyIDontCare 3 4 # <--- But the ORDER of the rows is critical and must be preserved.
The fact that I've got row-indices "a/b", and "c/d" is irrelevent, but what is crucial is the order in which the rows appear. Every version of "join" I've seen requires me to manually reset indices, which seems really awkward, and I don't trust that it won't screw up the ordering. I thought concat would work, but I get this:
>>> pd.concat( [df1, df2] , axis = 1, ignore_index= True )
0 1
a 1.0 NaN
b 3.0 NaN
c NaN 2.0
d NaN 4.0
# ^ obviously not what I want.
Even when I explicitly declare ignore_index.
How do I "overrule" the indexing and force the columns to be merged with the rows kept in the exact order that I supply them?
Edit:
Note that if I assign another column, the results are all "NaN".
>>> df1["second"]=df2["Second"]
>>> df1
First second
a 1 NaN
b 3 NaN
This was screwing me up but thanks to the suggestion from jsmart and topsail, you can dereference the indices by directly accessing the values in the column:
df1["second"]=df2["Second"].values
>>> df1
First second
a 1 2
b 3 4
^ Solution
This should also work I think:
df1["second"] = df2["second"].values
It would keep the index from the first dataframe, but since you have values in there such as "AnyThingAtAll" and "SeriouslyIdontCare" I guess any index values whatsoever are acceptable.
Basically, we are just adding a the values from your series as a new column to the first dataframe.
Here's a test example similar to your described problem:
# -----------
# sample data
# -----------
df1 = pd.DataFrame(
{
'x': ['a','b'],
'First': [1,3],
})
df1.set_index("x", drop=True, inplace=True)
df2 = pd.DataFrame(
{
'x': ['c','d'],
'Second': [2, 4],
})
df2.set_index("x", drop=True, inplace=True)
# ---------------------------------------------
# Add series as a new column to first dataframe
# ---------------------------------------------
df1["Second"] = df2["Second"].values
Result is:
First
Second
a
1
2
b
3
4
The goal is to combine data based on position (not by Index). Here is one way to do it:
import pandas as pd
# create data frames df1 and df2
df1 = pd.DataFrame(data = {'First': [1, 3]}, index=['a', 'b'])
df2 = pd.DataFrame(data = {'Second': [2, 4]}, index = ['c', 'd'])
# add a column to df1 -- add by position, not by Index
df1['Second'] = df2['Second'].values
print(df1)
First Second
a 1 2
b 3 4
And you could create a completely new data frame like this:
data = {'1st': df1['First'].values, '2nd': df1['Second'].values}
print(pd.DataFrame(data))
1st 2nd
0 1 2
1 3 4
ignore_index means whether to keep the output dataframe index from original along axis. If it is True, it means don't use original index but start from 0 to n just like what the column header 0, 1 shown in your result.
You can try
out = pd.concat( [df1.reset_index(drop=True), df2.reset_index(drop=True)] , axis = 1)
print(out)
First Second
0 1 2
1 3 4
I have a dataframe with relevant info, and I want to groupby one column, say id, with the other columns of the same id joined by "|". However, when I run my code, most of my columns end up missing (only the first 3 appear), and I don't know what is going wrong.
My code is:
df = df.groupby('id').agg(lambda col: '|'.join(set(col))).reset_index()
For instance, my data starts like
id words ... (other columns here)
0 a asd
1 a rtr
2 b s
3 c rrtttt
4 c dsfd
and I want
id ... (other columns here)
a asd|rtr
b s
c rrtttt|dsfd
but also with all the rest of my columns grouped similarly. Right now the rest of my columns just don't appear in my output dataset. Not sure what is going wrong. Thanks!
Convert to string beforehand, you can then avoid the lambda by using agg(set) and applymap after:
df.astype(str).groupby('id').agg(set).applymap('|'.join)
Minimal Verifiable Example
df = pd.DataFrame({
'id': ['a', 'a', 'b', 'c', 'c'],
'numbers': [1, 2, 2, 3, 3],
'words': ['asd', 'rtr', 's', 'rrtttt', 'dsfd']})
df
id numbers words
0 a 1 asd
1 a 2 rtr
2 b 2 s
3 c 3 rrtttt
4 c 3 dsfd
df.astype(str).groupby('id').agg(set).applymap('|'.join)
numbers words
id
a 1|2 asd|rtr
b 2 s
c 3 rrtttt|dsfd
right now I have two dataframes they look like:
c = pd.DataFrame({'my_goal':[3, 4, 5, 6, 7],
'low_number': [0,100,1000,2000,3000],
'high_number': [100,1000,2000,3000,4000]})
and
a= pd.DataFrame({'a':['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e'],
'Number':[50, 500, 1030, 2005 , 3575]})
what I want to do is if 'Number' falls between the low number and the high number I want it to bring back the value in 'my_goal'. For example if we look at 'a' it's 'Number is is 100 so I want it to bring back 3. I also want to create a dataframe that contains all the columns from dataframe a and the 'my_goal' column from dataframe c. I want the output to look like:
I tried making my high and low numbers into a separate list and running a for loop from that, but all that gives me are 'my_goal' numbers:
low_number= 'low_number': [0,100,1000,2000,3000]
for i in a:
if float(i) >= low_number:
a = c['my_goal']
print(a)
You can use pd.cut, when I see ranges, I first think of pd.cut:
dfa = pd.DataFrame(a)
dfc = pd.DataFrame(c)
dfa['my_goal'] = pd.cut(dfa['Number'],
bins=[0]+dfc['high_number'].tolist(),
labels=dfc['my_goal'])
Output:
a Number my_goal
0 a 50 3
1 b 500 4
2 c 1030 5
3 d 2005 6
4 e 3575 7
I changed row 4 slightly to include a test case where the condition is not met. You can concat a with rows of c where the condition is true.
a= pd.DataFrame({'a':['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e'],'Number':[50, 500, 1030, 1995 , 3575]})
cond= a.Number.between( c.low_number, c.high_number)
pd.concat([a, c.loc[cond, ['my_goal']] ], axis = 1, join = 'inner')
Number a my_goal
0 50 a 3
1 500 b 4
2 1030 c 5
4 3575 e 7
I am not sure if this is possible. I have two dataframes df1 and df2 which are presented like this:
df1 df2
id value id value
a 5 a 3
c 9 b 7
d 4 c 6
f 2 d 8
e 2
f 1
They will have many more entries in reality than presented here. I would like to create a third dataframe df3 based on the values in df1 and df2. Any values in df1 would take precedence over values in df2 when writing to df3 (if the same id is present in both df1 and df2) so in this example I would return:
df3
id value
a 5
b 7
c 9
d 4
e 2
f 2
I have tried using df2 as the base (df2 will have all of the id's present for the whole universe) and then overwriting the value for id's that are present in df1, but cannot find the merge syntax to do this.
You could use combine_first, provided that you first make the DataFrame index id (so that the values get aligned by id):
In [80]: df1.set_index('id').combine_first(df2.set_index('id')).reset_index()
Out[80]:
id value
0 a 5.0
1 b 7.0
2 c 9.0
3 d 4.0
4 e 2.0
5 f 2.0
Since you mentioned merging, you might be interested in seeing that
you could merge df1 and df2 on id, and then use fillna to replace NaNs in df1's the value column with values from df2's value column:
df1 = pd.DataFrame({'id': ['a', 'c', 'd', 'f'], 'value': [5, 9, 4, 2]})
df2 = pd.DataFrame({'id': ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f'], 'value': [3, 7, 6, 8, 2, 1]})
result = pd.merge(df2, df1, on='id', how='left', suffixes=('_x', ''))
result['value'] = result['value'].fillna(result['value_x'])
result = result[['id', 'value']]
print(result)
yields the same result, though the first method is simpler.
Data:
Multiple dataframes of the same format (same columns, an equal number of rows, and no points missing).
How do I create a "summary" dataframe that contains an element-wise mean for every element? How about a dataframe that contains an element-wise standard deviation?
A B C
0 -1.624722 -1.160731 0.016726
1 -1.565694 0.989333 1.040820
2 -0.484945 0.718596 -0.180779
3 0.388798 -0.997036 1.211787
4 -0.249211 1.604280 -1.100980
5 0.062425 0.925813 -1.810696
6 0.793244 -1.860442 -1.196797
A B C
0 1.016386 1.766780 0.648333
1 -1.101329 -1.021171 0.830281
2 -1.133889 -2.793579 0.839298
3 1.134425 0.611480 -1.482724
4 -0.066601 -2.123353 1.136564
5 -0.167580 -0.991550 0.660508
6 0.528789 -0.483008 1.472787
You can create a panel of your DataFrames and then compute the mean and SD along the items axis:
df1 = pd.DataFrame(np.random.randn(10, 3), columns=['A', 'B', 'C'])
df2 = pd.DataFrame(np.random.randn(10, 3), columns=['A', 'B', 'C'])
df3 = pd.DataFrame(np.random.randn(10, 3), columns=['A', 'B', 'C'])
p = pd.Panel({n: df for n, df in enumerate([df1, df2, df3])})
>>> p.mean(axis=0)
A B C
0 -0.024284 -0.622337 0.581292
1 0.186271 0.596634 -0.498755
2 0.084591 -0.760567 -0.334429
3 -0.833688 0.403628 0.013497
4 0.402502 -0.017670 -0.369559
5 0.733305 -1.311827 0.463770
6 -0.941334 0.843020 -1.366963
7 0.134700 0.626846 0.994085
8 -0.783517 0.703030 -1.187082
9 -0.954325 0.514671 -0.370741
>>> p.std(axis=0)
A B C
0 0.196526 1.870115 0.503855
1 0.719534 0.264991 1.232129
2 0.315741 0.773699 1.328869
3 1.169213 1.488852 1.149105
4 1.416236 1.157386 0.414532
5 0.554604 1.022169 1.324711
6 0.178940 1.107710 0.885941
7 1.270448 1.023748 1.102772
8 0.957550 0.355523 1.284814
9 0.582288 0.997909 1.566383
One simple solution here is to simply concatenate the existing dataframes into a single dataframe while adding an ID variable to track the original source:
dfa = pd.DataFrame( np.random.randn(2,2), columns=['a','b'] ).assign(id='a')
dfb = pd.DataFrame( np.random.randn(2,2), columns=['a','b'] ).assign(id='b')
df = pd.concat([df1,df2])
a b id
0 -0.542652 1.609213 a
1 -0.192136 0.458564 a
0 -0.231949 -0.000573 b
1 0.245715 -0.083786 b
So now you have two 2x2 dataframes combined into a single 4x2 dataframe. The 'id' columns identifies the source dataframe so you haven't lost any generality, and can select on 'id' to do the same thing you would to any single dataframe. E.g. df[ df['id'] == 'a' ].
But now you can also use groupby to do any pandas method such as mean() or std() on an element by element basis:
df.groupby('id').mean()
a b
index
0 0.198164 -0.811475
1 0.639529 0.812810
The following solution worked for me.
average_data_frame = (dataframe1 + dataframe2 ) / 2
Or, if you have more than two dataframes, say n, then
average_data_frame = dataframe1
for i in range(1,n):
average_data_frame = average_data_frame + i_th_dataframe
average_data_frame = average_data_frame / n
Once you have the average, you can go for the standard deviation. If you are looking for a "true Pythonic" approach, you should follow other answers. But if you are looking for a working and quick solution, this is it.