Develop Reference

how to get second last and last value in a string after separator in python

In Python, how do you get the last and second last element in string ?
string "client_user_username_type_1234567"
expected output : "type_1234567"

Try this :
>>> s = "client_user_username_type_1234567"
>>> '_'.join(s.split('_')[-2:])
'type_1234567'

You can also use re.findall:
import re
s = "client_user_username_type_1234567"
result = re.findall('[a-zA-Z]+_\d+$', s)[0]
Output:
'type_1234567'

There's no set function that will do this for you, you have to use what Python gives you and for that I present:
split slice and join
"_".join("one_two_three".split("_")[-2:])
In steps:
Split the string by the common separator, "_"
s.split("_")
Slice the list so that you get the last two elements by using a negative index
s.split("_")[-2:]
Now you have a list composed of the last two elements, now you have to merge that list again so it's like the original string, with separator "_".
"_".join("one_two_three".split("_")[-2:])
That's pretty much it. Another way to investigate is through regex.

Python 3 split()

When I'm splitting a string "abac" I'm getting undesired results.
Example
print("abac".split("a"))
Why does it print:
['', 'b', 'c']
instead of
['b', 'c']
Can anyone explain this behavior and guide me on how to get my desired output?
Thanks in advance.

As #DeepSpace pointed out (referring to the docs)
If sep is given, consecutive delimiters are not grouped together and are deemed to delimit empty strings (for example, '1,,2'.split(',') returns ['1', '', '2']).
Therefore I'd suggest using a better delimiter such as a comma , or if this is the formatting you're stuck with then you could just use the builtin filter() function as suggested in this answer, this will remove any "empty" strings if passed None as the function.
sample = 'abac'
filtered_sample = filter(None, sample.split('a'))
print(filtered_sample)
#['b', 'c']

When you split a string in python you keep everything between your delimiters (even when it's an empty string!)
For example, if you had a list of letters separated by commas:
>>> "a,b,c,d".split(',')
['a','b','c','d']
If your list had some missing values you might leave the space in between the commas blank:
>>> "a,b,,d".split(',')
['a','b','','d']
The start and end of the string act as delimiters themselves, so if you have a leading or trailing delimiter you will also get this "empty string" sliced out of your main string:
>>> "a,b,c,d,,".split(',')
['a','b','c','d','','']
>>> ",a,b,c,d".split(',')
['','a','b','c','d']
If you want to get rid of any empty strings in your output, you can use the filter function.
If instead you just want to get rid of this behavior near the edges of your main string, you can strip the delimiters off first:
>>> ",,a,b,c,d".strip(',')
"a,b,c,d"
>>> ",,a,b,c,d".strip(',').split(',')
['a','b','c','d']

In your example, "a" is what's called a delimiter. It acts as a boundary between the characters before it and after it. So, when you call split, it gets the characters before "a" and after "a" and inserts it into the list. Since there's nothing in front of the first "a" in the string "abac", it returns an empty string and inserts it into the list.

split will return the characters between the delimiters you specify (or between an end of the string and a delimiter), even if there aren't any, in which case it will return an empty string. (See the documentation for more information.)
In this case, if you don't want any empty strings in the output, you can use filter to remove them:
list(filter(lambda s: len(s) > 0, "abac".split("a"))

Add a number to the beginning of a string in particular locations

I have this string:
abc,12345,abc,abc,abc,abc,12345,98765443,xyz,zyx,123
What can I use to add a 0 to the beginning of each number in this string? So how can I turn that string into something like:
abc,012345,abc,abc,abc,abc,012345,098765443,xyz,zyx,0123
I've tried playing around with Regex but I'm unsure how I can use that effectively to yield the result I want. I need it to match with a string of numbers rather than a positive integer, but with only numbers in the string, so not something like:
1234abc567 into 01234abc567 as it has letters in it. Each value is always separated by a comma.

Use re.sub,
re.sub(r'(^|,)(\d)', r'\g<1>0\2', s)
or
re.sub(r'(^|,)(?=\d)', r'\g<1>0', s)
or
re.sub(r'\b(\d)', r'0\1', s)

Try following
re.sub(r'(?<=\b)(\d+)(?=\b)', r'\g<1>0', str)

If the numbers are always seperated by commas in your string, you can use basic list methods to achieve the result you want.
Let's say your string is called x
y=x.split(',')
x=''
for i in y:
if i.isdigit():
i='0'+i
x=x+i+','
What this piece of code does is the following:
Splits your string into pieces depending on where you have commas and returns a list of the pieces.
Checks if the pieces are actually numbers, and if they are a 0 is added using string concatenation.
Finally your string is rebuilt by concatenating the pieces along with the commas.

Split a string using a list of strings as a pattern

Consider an input string :
mystr = "just some stupid string to illustrate my question"
and a list of strings indicating where to split the input string:
splitters = ["some", "illustrate"]
The output should look like
result = ["just ", "some stupid string to ", "illustrate my question"]
I wrote some code which implements the following approach. For each of the strings in splitters, I find its occurrences in the input string, and insert something which I know for sure would not be a part of my input string (for example, this '!!'). Then I split the string using the substring that I just inserted.
for s in splitters:
mystr = re.sub(r'(%s)'%s,r'!!\1', mystr)
result = re.split('!!', mystr)
This solution seems ugly, is there a nicer way of doing it?

Splitting with re.split will always remove the matched string from the output (NB, this is not quite true, see the edit below). Therefore, you must use positive lookahead expressions ((?=...)) to match without removing the match. However, re.split ignores empty matches, so simply using a lookahead expression doesn't work. Instead, you will lose one character at each split at minimum (even trying to trick re with "boundary" matches (\b) does not work). If you don't care about losing one whitespace / non-word character at the end of each item (assuming you only split at non-word characters), you can use something like
re.split(r"\W(?=some|illustrate)")
which would give
["just", "some stupid string to", "illustrate my question"]
(note that the spaces after just and to are missing). You could then programmatically generate these regexes using str.join. Note that each of the split markers is escaped with re.escape so that special characters in the items of splitters do not affect the meaning of the regular expression in any undesired ways (imagine, e.g., a ) in one of the strings, which would otherwise lead to a regex syntax error).
the_regex = r"\W(?={})".format("|".join(re.escape(s) for s in splitters))
Edit (HT to #Arkadiy): Grouping the actual match, i.e. using (\W) instead of \W, returns the non-word characters inserted into the list as seperate items. Joining every two subsequent items would then produce the list as desired as well. Then, you can also drop the requirement of having a non-word character by using (.) instead of \W:
the_new_regex = r"(.)(?={})".format("|".join(re.escape(s) for s in splitters))
the_split = re.split(the_new_regex, mystr)
the_actual_split = ["".join(x) for x in itertools.izip_longest(the_split[::2], the_split[1::2], fillvalue='')]
Because normal text and auxiliary character alternate, the_split[::2] contains the normal split text and the_split[1::2] the auxiliary characters. Then, itertools.izip_longest is used to combine each text item with the corresponding removed character and the last item (which is unmatched in the removed characters)) with fillvalue, i.e. ''. Then, each of these tuples is joined using "".join(x). Note that this requires itertools to be imported (you could of course do this in a simple loop, but itertools provides very clean solutions to these things). Also note that itertools.izip_longest is called itertools.zip_longest in Python 3.
This leads to further simplification of the regular expression, because instead of using auxiliary characters, the lookahead can be replaced with a simple matching group ((some|interesting) instead of (.)(?=some|interesting)):
the_newest_regex = "({})".format("|".join(re.escape(s) for s in splitters))
the_raw_split = re.split(the_newest_regex, mystr)
the_actual_split = ["".join(x) for x in itertools.izip_longest([""] + the_raw_split[1::2], the_raw_split[::2], fillvalue='')]
Here, the slice indices on the_raw_split have swapped, because now the even-numbered items must be added to item afterwards instead of in front. Also note the [""] + part, which is necessary to pair the first item with "" to fix the order.
(end of edit)
Alternatively, you can (if you want) use string.replace instead of re.sub for each splitter (I think that is a matter of preference in your case, but in general it is probably more efficient)
for s in splitters:
mystr = mystr.replace(s, "!!" + s)
Also, if you use a fixed token to indicate where to split, you do not need re.split, but can use string.split instead:
result = mystr.split("!!")
What you could also do (instead of relying on the replacement token not to be in the string anywhere else or relying on every split position being preceded by a non-word character) is finding the split strings in the input using string.find and using string slicing to extract the pieces:
def split(string, splitters):
while True:
# Get the positions to split at for all splitters still in the string
# that are not at the very front of the string
split_positions = [i for i in (string.find(s) for s in splitters) if i > 0]
if len(split_positions) > 0:
# There is still somewhere to split
next_split = min(split_positions)
yield string[:next_split] # Yield everything before that position
string = string[next_split:] # Retain the rest of the string
else:
yield string # Yield the rest of the string
break # Done.
Here, [i for i in (string.find(s) for s in splitters) if i > 0] generates a list of positions where the splitters can be found, for all splitters that are in the string (for this, i < 0 is excluded) and not right at the beginning (where we (possibly) just split, so i == 0 is excluded as well). If there are any left in the string, we yield (this is a generator function) everything up to (excluding) the first splitter (at min(split_positions)) and replace the string with the remaining part. If there are none left, we yield the last part of the string and exit the function. Because this uses yield, it is a generator function, so you need to use list to turn it into an actual list.
Note that you could also replace yield whatever with a call to some_list.append (provided you defined some_list earlier) and return some_list at the very end, I do not consider that to be very good code style, though.
TL;DR
If you are OK with using regular expressions, use
the_newest_regex = "({})".format("|".join(re.escape(s) for s in splitters))
the_raw_split = re.split(the_newest_regex, mystr)
the_actual_split = ["".join(x) for x in itertools.izip_longest([""] + the_raw_split[1::2], the_raw_split[::2], fillvalue='')]
else, the same can also be achieved using string.find with the following split function:
def split(string, splitters):
while True:
# Get the positions to split at for all splitters still in the string
# that are not at the very front of the string
split_positions = [i for i in (string.find(s) for s in splitters) if i > 0]
if len(split_positions) > 0:
# There is still somewhere to split
next_split = min(split_positions)
yield string[:next_split] # Yield everything before that position
string = string[next_split:] # Retain the rest of the string
else:
yield string # Yield the rest of the string
break # Done.

Not especially elegant but avoiding regex:
mystr = "just some stupid string to illustrate my question"
splitters = ["some", "illustrate"]
indexes = [0] + [mystr.index(s) for s in splitters] + [len(mystr)]
indexes = sorted(list(set(indexes)))
print [mystr[i:j] for i, j in zip(indexes[:-1], indexes[1:])]
# ['just ', 'some stupid string to ', 'illustrate my question']
I should acknowledge here that a little more work is needed if a word in splitters occurs more than once because str.index finds only the location of the first occurrence of the word...

Python, breaking up Strings

I need to make a program in which the user inputs a word and I need to do something to each individual letter in that word. They cannot enter it one letter at a time just one word.
I.E. someone enters "test" how can I make my program know that it is a four letter word and how to break it up, like make my program make four variables each variable set to a different letter. It should also be able to work with bigger and smaller words.
Could I use a for statement? Something like For letter ste that letter to a variable, but what is it was like a 20 character letter how would the program get all the variable names and such?

Do you mean something like this?
>>> s = 'four'
>>> l = list(s)
>>> l
['f', 'o', 'u', 'r']
>>>
Addendum:
Even though that's (apparently) what you think you wanted, it's probably not necessary because it's possible for a string to hold virtually any size of a word -- so a single string variable likesabove should be good enough for your program verses trying to create a bunch of separately named variables for each character. For one thing, it would be difficult to write the rest of the program because you wouldn't to know what valid variable names to use.
The reason it's OK not to have separate variable for each character is because a single string can have any number of characters in it as well as be empty. Python's built-inlen()function will return a count of the number of letters in a string if applied to one, so the result oflen(s)in the above would be4.
Any character in a string can be randomly accessed by indexing it with an integer between0andlen(s)-1inside of square brackets, so to reference the third character you would uses[2]. It's useful to think of the index as the offset or the character from the beginning of the string.
Even so, in Python using indexing is often not needed because you can also iteratively process each character in a string in aforloop without using them as shown in this simple example:
num_vowels = 0
for ch in s:
if ch in 'aeiou':
num_vowels += 1
print 'there are', num_vowels, 'vowel(s) in the string', s
Python also has many other facilities and built-ins that further help when processing strings (and in fact could simplify the above example), which you'll eventually learn as you become more familiar with the language and its many libraries.

When you iterate a string, it returns the individual characters like
for c in thestring:
print(c)
You can use this to put the letters into a list if you really need to, which will retain its order but list(string) is a better choice for that (be aware that unordered types like dict or set do not guarantee any order).

You don't have to do any of those; In Python, you can access characters of a string using square brackets:
>>> word = "word"
>>> print(word[0])
w
>>> print(word[3])
d
>>> print(len(word))
4

You don't want to assign each letter to a separate variable. Then you'd be writing the rest of your program without even being able to know how many variables you have defined! That's an even worse problem than dealing with the whole string at once.
What you instead want to do is have just one variable holding the string, but you can refer to individual characters in it with indexing. Say the string is in s, then s[0] is the first character, s[1] is the second character, etc. And you can find out how far up the numbers go by checking len(s) - 1 (because the indexes start at 0, a length 1 string has maximum index 0, a length 2 string has maximum index 1, etc).
That's much more manageable than figuring out how to generate len(s) variable names, assign them all to a piece of the string, and then know which variables you need to reference.
Strings are immutable though, so you can't assign to s[1] to change the 2nd character. If you need to do that you can instead create a list with e.g. l = list(s). Then l[1] is the second character, and you can assign l[1] = something to change the element in the list. Then when you're done you can get a new string out with s_new = ''.join(l) (join builds a string by joining together a sequence of strings passed as its argument, using the string it was invoked on to the left as a separator between each of the elements in the sequence; in this case we're joining a list of single-character strings using the empty string as a separator, so we just get all the single-character strings joined into a single string).

x = 'test'
counter = 0
while counter < len(x):
print x[counter] # you can change this to do whatever you want to with x[counter]
counter += 1