Python 3.7 is manually installed on my system, located in:
/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework
However, Homebrew still considers Python as a missing dependency for a formula which needs it (i.e., when typing brew missing).
How can I tell Homebrew that Python is already installed?
I'm not sure that brew will let you replace its own Python with another one. If a recipe specifies python as a dependency, that means brew's Python.
If you are concerned about brew's Python responding to the python command instead of your existing 3.7 installation this is best managed by adjusting your $PATH environment variable so that the directory containing the framework Python comes before /usr/local or wherever brew installs things on your machine. This might modify the Python that brew-installed software sees.
I decided today I better download python 3.4. So I go to the python/downloads page and do that. Now I am trying to make a new virtualenv using my new python module, mkvirtualenv -p python3.4 sandbox, but I get an error that it can't find my python executable.
The executable /Users/croberts/python3.4 (from --python=/Users/croberts/python3.4) does not exist
This is understandable, but I can't figure out where it is. The old versions of python are in /usr/bin/ but the new one didn't get installed there. How do you search for where a program is using the terminal?
According to the ReadMe.txt bundled with the installer, Python installs default to /Library/frameworks/Python.framework. I just did a test install and it ended up here specifically:
/Library/frameworks/Python.framework/versions/3.4/Python
Unless you changed the settings on the installer, that's where it should live. (If you installed it from source, I'd assume you'd know where you put it.) Something to note is that if you use Homebrew (and possibly other OSX package managers like MacPorts, though I haven't used it), installing Python through the PPC installer will cause a warning:
Warning: Python is installed at /Library/Frameworks/Python.framework
Homebrew only supports building against the System-provided Python or a
brewed Python. In particular, Pythons installed to /Library can interfere
with other software installs.
So if you do use Homebrew (and it's great), it's best to simply use brew install python3, which will put it into /usr/local/bin. Then you can alias python (or python3) to that version, instead.
I've installed A LOT of python packages for Python 2.6. Now I would like to upgrade Python to 2.7. Is there a proper or systematic way to update all the installed packages?
In my system, all the packages are installed at
/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/ and
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/
One obvious way is to install Python 2.7, download all the package sources or egg files, and re-install them one by one. However, Some useful packages like numpy and scipy are notorious for installation, especially when one needs to install from source. I expect I'll need to spend several hours to find the packages and solve the installation problems here and there.
Anyone has any suggestions on systematically update the installed packages?
First, you should not never ever ever ever install Python packages in in system library folder with easy_install using sudo on any operating system.
http://jamiecurle.co.uk/blog/installing-pip-virtualenv-and-virtualenvwrapper-on-os-x/#comment-573429347
The correct procedure would be make your installation procedure repeatable. There exist two commonly used solutions in Python world. These solutions automatically download correct versions of Python packages from http://pypi.python.org
PIP
pip and requirements.txt http://www.pip-installer.org/en/latest/requirements.html within virtualenv http://pypi.python.org/pypi/virtualenv
Buidout
Buildout, example from Plone CMS https://github.com/plone/Installers-UnifiedInstaller/blob/master/base_skeleton/versions.cfg
Buildout can also do configure, make, make install style installations for packages which need native libraries. For example there exist solution for libxml2 + lxml
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/z3c.recipe.staticlxml/
(Note: buildout does not need virtualenv as it does its own isolation from system Python)
Background
I don't develop using OS X's system provided Python versions (on OS X 10.6 that's Python 2.5.4 and 2.6.1).
I don't install anything in the site-packages directory for the OS provided versions of Python. (The only exception is Mercurial installed from a binary package, which installs two packages in the Python 2.6.1 site-packages directory.)
I installed three versions of Python, all using the Mac OS X installer disk image:
Python 2.6.6
Python 2.7
Python 3.1.2
I don't like polluting the site-packages directory for my Python installations. So I only install the following five base packages in the site-packages directory. For the actual method/commands used to install these, see SO Question 4324558.
setuptools/ez_setup
distribute
pip
virtualenv
virtualenvwrapper
All other packages are installed in virtualenvs.
I am the only user of this MacBook.
Questions
Given the above background, why should I install the five base packages in ~/.local? Since I'm installing these base packages into the site-packages directories of Python distributions that I've installed, I'm isolated from the OS X's Python distributions.
Using this method, should I be concerned about Glyph's comment that other things could potentially break (see his comment below)?
Again, I'm only interested in where to install those five base packages.
Related Questions/Info
I'm asking because of Glyph's comment to my answer to SO question 4314376, which stated:
NO. NEVER EVER do sudo python setup.py install whatever. Write a ~/.pydistutils.cfg that puts your pip installation into ~/.local or something. Especially files named ez_setup.py tend to suck down newer versions of things like setuptools and easy_install, which can potentially break other things on your operating system.
Previously, I asked What's the proper way to install pip, virtualenv, and distribute for Python?. However, no one answered the "why" of using ~/.local.
There's no particularly good reason for or against installing in .local for Mac OS X installations using framework builds. There is still some controversy among Python core developers on this point with Glyph arguing that the .local location, introduced in Python 2.6 for other Unixy systems, should be used for Mac OS X and simplifies third-party installation processes, while others argue that the previous traditional locations for Mac OS X framework builds is more natural. In the end, it is up to you. Particularly if you are using virtual environments, if it works, don't worry about it.
As of 2020, I do not think it is a good idea to install Python packages into .local, but to use virtualenv to create a separate environment for each package.
My reason
While installations into .local do not interfere with the system wide Python, you still can have conflicts between several packages installed into .local.
P.S.: If you do you like virtualenv you could also use pipx.
I'm starting to learn python and loving it. I work on a Mac mainly as well as Linux. I'm finding that on Linux (Ubuntu 9.04 mostly) when I install a python module using apt-get it works fine. I can import it with no trouble.
On the Mac, I'm used to using Macports to install all the Unixy stuff. However, I'm finding that most of the python modules I install with it are not being seen by python. I've spent some time playing around with PATH settings and using python_select . Nothing has really worked and at this point I'm not really understanding, instead I'm just poking around.
I get the impression that Macports isn't universally loved for managing python modules. I'd like to start fresh using a more "accepted" (if that's the right word) approach.
So, I was wondering, what is the method that Mac python developers use to manage their modules?
Bonus questions:
Do you use Apple's python, or some other version?
Do you compile everything from source or is there a package manger that works well (Fink?).
The most popular way to manage python packages (if you're not using your system package manager) is to use setuptools and easy_install. It is probably already installed on your system. Use it like this:
easy_install django
easy_install uses the Python Package Index which is an amazing resource for python developers. Have a look around to see what packages are available.
A better option is pip, which is gaining traction, as it attempts to fix a lot of the problems associated with easy_install. Pip uses the same package repository as easy_install, it just works better. Really the only time use need to use easy_install is for this command:
easy_install pip
After that, use:
pip install django
At some point you will probably want to learn a bit about virtualenv. If you do a lot of python development on projects with conflicting package requirements, virtualenv is a godsend. It will allow you to have completely different versions of various packages, and switch between them easily depending your needs.
Regarding which python to use, sticking with Apple's python will give you the least headaches, but If you need a newer version (Leopard is 2.5.1 I believe), I would go with the macports python 2.6.
Your question is already three years old and there are some details not covered in other answers:
Most people I know use HomeBrew or MacPorts, I prefer MacPorts because of its clean cut of what is a default Mac OS X environment and my development setup. Just move out your /opt folder and test your packages with a normal user Python environment
MacPorts is only portable within Mac, but with easy_install or pip you will learn how to setup your environment in any platform (Win/Mac/Linux/Bsd...). Furthermore it will always be more up to date and with more packages
I personally let MacPorts handle my Python modules to keep everything updated. Like any other high level package manager (ie: apt-get) it is much better for the heavy lifting of modules with lots of binary dependencies. There is no way I would build my Qt bindings (PySide) with easy_install or pip. Qt is huge and takes a lot to compile. As soon as you want a Python package that needs a library used by non Python programs, try to avoid easy_install or pip
At some point you will find that there are some packages missing within MacPorts. I do not believe that MacPorts will ever give you the whole CheeseShop. For example, recently I needed the Elixir module, but MacPorts only offers py25-elixir and py26-elixir, no py27 version. In cases like these you have:
pip-2.7 install --user elixir
( make sure you always type pip-(version) )
That will build an extra Python library in your home dir. Yes, Python will work with more than one library location: one controlled by MacPorts and a user local one for everything missing within MacPorts.
Now notice that I favor pip over easy_install. There is a good reason you should avoid setuptools and easy_install. Here is a good explanation and I try to keep away from them. One very useful feature of pip is giving you a list of all the modules (along their versions) that you installed with MacPorts, easy_install and pip itself:
pip-2.7 freeze
If you already started using easy_install, don't worry, pip can recognize everything done already by easy_install and even upgrade the packages installed with it.
If you are a developer keep an eye on virtualenv for controlling different setups and combinations of module versions. Other answers mention it already, what is not mentioned so far is the Tox module, a tool for testing that your package installs correctly with different Python versions.
Although I usually do not have version conflicts, I like to have virtualenv to set up a clean environment and get a clear view of my packages dependencies. That way I never forget any dependencies in my setup.py
If you go for MacPorts be aware that multiple versions of the same package are not selected anymore like the old Debian style with an extra python_select package (it is still there for compatibility). Now you have the select command to choose which Python version will be used (you can even select the Apple installed ones):
$ port select python
Available versions for python:
none
python25-apple
python26-apple
python27 (active)
python27-apple
python32
$ port select python python32
Add tox on top of it and your programs should be really portable
Please see Python OS X development environment. The best way is to use MacPorts. Download and install MacPorts, then install Python via MacPorts by typing the following commands in the Terminal:
sudo port install python26 python_select
sudo port select --set python python26
OR
sudo port install python30 python_select
sudo port select --set python python30
Use the first set of commands to install Python 2.6 and the second set to install Python 3.0. Then use:
sudo port install py26-packagename
OR
sudo port install py30-packagename
In the above commands, replace packagename with the name of the package, for example:
sudo port install py26-setuptools
These commands will automatically install the package (and its dependencies) for the given Python version.
For a full list of available packages for Python, type:
port list | grep py26-
OR
port list | grep py30-
Which command you use depends on which version of Python you chose to install.
I use MacPorts to install Python and any third-party modules tracked by MacPorts into /opt/local, and I install any manually installed modules (those not in the MacPorts repository) into /usr/local, and this has never caused any problems. I think you may be confused as to the use of certain MacPorts scripts and environment variables.
MacPorts python_select is used to select the "current" version of Python, but it has nothing to do with modules. This allows you to, e.g., install both Python 2.5 and Python 2.6 using MacPorts, and switch between installs.
The $PATH environment variables does not affect what Python modules are loaded. $PYTHONPATH is what you are looking for. $PYTHONPATH should point to directories containing Python modules you want to load. In my case, my $PYTHONPATH variable contains /usr/local/lib/python26/site-packages. If you use MacPorts' Python, it sets up the other proper directories for you, so you only need to add additional paths to $PYTHONPATH. But again, $PATH isn't used at all when Python searches for modules you have installed.
$PATH is used to find executables, so if you install MacPorts' Python, make sure /opt/local/bin is in your $PATH.
There's nothing wrong with using a MacPorts Python installation. If you are installing python modules from MacPorts but then not seeing them, that likely means you are not invoking the MacPorts python you installed to. In a terminal shell, you can use absolute paths to invoke the various Pythons that may be installed. For example:
$ /usr/bin/python2.5 # Apple-supplied 2.5 (Leopard)
$ /opt/local/bin/python2.5 # MacPorts 2.5
$ /opt/local/bin/python2.6 # MacPorts 2.6
$ /usr/local/bin/python2.6 # python.org (MacPython) 2.6
$ /usr/local/bin/python3.1 # python.org (MacPython) 3.1
To get the right python by default requires ensuring your shell $PATH is set properly to ensure that the right executable is found first. Another solution is to define shell aliases to the various pythons.
A python.org (MacPython) installation is fine, too, as others have suggested. easy_install can help but, again, because each Python instance may have its own easy_install command, make sure you are invoking the right easy_install.
If you use Python from MacPorts, it has it's own easy_install located at: /opt/local/bin/easy_install-2.6 (for py26, that is). It's not the same one as simply calling easy_install directly, even if you used python_select to change your default python command.
Have you looked into easy_install at all? It won't synchronize your macports or anything like that, but it will automatically download the latest package and all necessary dependencies, i.e.
easy_install nose
for the nose unit testing package, or
easy_install trac
for the trac bug tracker.
There's a bit more information on their EasyInstall page too.
For MacPython installations, I found an effective solution to fixing the problem with setuptools (easy_install) in this blog post:
http://droidism.com/getting-running-with-django-and-macpython-26-on-leopard
One handy tip includes finding out which version of python is active in the terminal:
which python
When you install modules with MacPorts, it does not go into Apple's version of Python. Instead those modules are installed onto the MacPorts version of Python selected.
You can change which version of Python is used by default using a mac port called python_select. instructions here.
Also, there's easy_install. Which will use python to install python modules.
You may already have pip3 pre-installed, so just try it!
Regarding which python version to use, Mac OS usually ships an old version of python. It's a good idea to upgrade to a newer version. You can download a .dmg from http://www.python.org/download/ . If you do that, remember to update the path. You can find the exact commands here http://farmdev.com/thoughts/66/python-3-0-on-mac-os-x-alongside-2-6-2-5-etc-/
I use easy_install with Apple's Python, and it works like a charm.
Directly install one of the fink packages (Django 1.6 as of 2013-Nov)
fink install django-py27
fink install django-py33
Or create yourself a virtualenv:
fink install virtualenv-py27
virtualenv django-env
source django-env/bin/activate
pip install django
deactivate # when you are done
Or use fink django plus any other pip installed packages in a virtualenv
fink install django-py27
fink install virtualenv-py27
virtualenv django-env --system-site-packages
source django-env/bin/activate
# django already installed
pip install django-analytical # or anything else you might want
deactivate # back to your normally scheduled programming