Develop Reference

Zylabs 7.14 Lab: Reverse binary [duplicate]

Are there any canned Python methods to convert an Integer (or Long) into a binary string in Python?
There are a myriad of dec2bin() functions out on Google... But I was hoping I could use a built-in function / library.

Python's string format method can take a format spec.
>>> "{0:b}".format(37)
'100101'
Format spec docs for Python 2
Format spec docs for Python 3

If you're looking for bin() as an equivalent to hex(), it was added in python 2.6.
Example:
>>> bin(10)
'0b1010'

Python actually does have something already built in for this, the ability to do operations such as '{0:b}'.format(42), which will give you the bit pattern (in a string) for 42, or 101010.
For a more general philosophy, no language or library will give its user base everything that they desire. If you're working in an environment that doesn't provide exactly what you need, you should be collecting snippets of code as you develop to ensure you never have to write the same thing twice. Such as, for example, the pseudo-code:
define intToBinString, receiving intVal:
if intVal is equal to zero:
return "0"
set strVal to ""
while intVal is greater than zero:
if intVal is odd:
prefix "1" to strVal
else:
prefix "0" to strVal
divide intVal by two, rounding down
return strVal
which will construct your binary string based on the decimal value. Just keep in mind that's a generic bit of pseudo-code which may not be the most efficient way of doing it though, with the iterations you seem to be proposing, it won't make much difference. It's really just meant as a guideline on how it could be done.
The general idea is to use code from (in order of preference):
the language or built-in libraries.
third-party libraries with suitable licenses.
your own collection.
something new you need to write (and save in your own collection for later).

If you want a textual representation without the 0b-prefix, you could use this:
get_bin = lambda x: format(x, 'b')
print(get_bin(3))
>>> '11'
print(get_bin(-3))
>>> '-11'
When you want a n-bit representation:
get_bin = lambda x, n: format(x, 'b').zfill(n)
>>> get_bin(12, 32)
'00000000000000000000000000001100'
>>> get_bin(-12, 32)
'-00000000000000000000000000001100'
Alternatively, if you prefer having a function:
def get_bin(x, n=0):
"""
Get the binary representation of x.
Parameters
----------
x : int
n : int
Minimum number of digits. If x needs less digits in binary, the rest
is filled with zeros.
Returns
-------
str
"""
return format(x, 'b').zfill(n)

I am surprised there is no mention of a nice way to accomplish this using formatting strings that are supported in Python 3.6 and higher. TLDR:
>>> number = 1
>>> f'0b{number:08b}'
'0b00000001'
Longer story
This is functionality of formatting strings available from Python 3.6:
>>> x, y, z = 1, 2, 3
>>> f'{x} {y} {2*z}'
'1 2 6'
You can request binary as well:
>>> f'{z:b}'
'11'
Specify the width:
>>> f'{z:8b}'
' 11'
Request zero padding:
f'{z:08b}'
'00000011'
And add common prefix to signify binary number:
>>> f'0b{z:08b}'
'0b00000011'
You can also let Python add the prefix for you but I do not like it so much as the version above because you have to take the prefix into width consideration:
>>> f'{z:#010b}'
'0b00000011'
More info is available in official documentation on Formatted string literals and Format Specification Mini-Language.

As a reference:
def toBinary(n):
return ''.join(str(1 & int(n) >> i) for i in range(64)[::-1])
This function can convert a positive integer as large as 18446744073709551615, represented as string '1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111'.
It can be modified to serve a much larger integer, though it may not be as handy as "{0:b}".format() or bin().

This is for python 3 and it keeps the leading zeros !
print(format(0, '08b'))

A simple way to do that is to use string format, see this page.
>> "{0:b}".format(10)
'1010'
And if you want to have a fixed length of the binary string, you can use this:
>> "{0:{fill}8b}".format(10, fill='0')
'00001010'
If two's complement is required, then the following line can be used:
'{0:{fill}{width}b}'.format((x + 2**n) % 2**n, fill='0', width=n)
where n is the width of the binary string.

one-liner with lambda:
>>> binary = lambda n: '' if n==0 else binary(n/2) + str(n%2)
test:
>>> binary(5)
'101'
EDIT:
but then :(
t1 = time()
for i in range(1000000):
binary(i)
t2 = time()
print(t2 - t1)
# 6.57236599922
in compare to
t1 = time()
for i in range(1000000):
'{0:b}'.format(i)
t2 = time()
print(t2 - t1)
# 0.68017411232

As the preceding answers mostly used format(),
here is an f-string implementation.
integer = 7
bit_count = 5
print(f'{integer:0{bit_count}b}')
Output:
00111
For convenience here is the python docs link for formatted string literals: https://docs.python.org/3/reference/lexical_analysis.html#f-strings.

Summary of alternatives:
n=42
assert "-101010" == format(-n, 'b')
assert "-101010" == "{0:b}".format(-n)
assert "-101010" == (lambda x: x >= 0 and str(bin(x))[2:] or "-" + str(bin(x))[3:])(-n)
assert "0b101010" == bin(n)
assert "101010" == bin(n)[2:] # But this won't work for negative numbers.
Contributors include John Fouhy, Tung Nguyen, mVChr, Martin Thoma. and Martijn Pieters.

>>> format(123, 'b')
'1111011'

For those of us who need to convert signed integers (range -2**(digits-1) to 2**(digits-1)-1) to 2's complement binary strings, this works:
def int2bin(integer, digits):
if integer >= 0:
return bin(integer)[2:].zfill(digits)
else:
return bin(2**digits + integer)[2:]
This produces:
>>> int2bin(10, 8)
'00001010'
>>> int2bin(-10, 8)
'11110110'
>>> int2bin(-128, 8)
'10000000'
>>> int2bin(127, 8)
'01111111'

you can do like that :
bin(10)[2:]
or :
f = str(bin(10))
c = []
c.append("".join(map(int, f[2:])))
print c

Using numpy pack/unpackbits, they are your best friends.
Examples
--------
>>> a = np.array([[2], [7], [23]], dtype=np.uint8)
>>> a
array([[ 2],
[ 7],
[23]], dtype=uint8)
>>> b = np.unpackbits(a, axis=1)
>>> b
array([[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1],
[0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1]], dtype=uint8)

Yet another solution with another algorithm, by using bitwise operators.
def int2bin(val):
res=''
while val>0:
res += str(val&1)
val=val>>1 # val=val/2
return res[::-1] # reverse the string
A faster version without reversing the string.
def int2bin(val):
res=''
while val>0:
res = chr((val&1) + 0x30) + res
val=val>>1
return res

numpy.binary_repr(num, width=None)
Examples from the documentation link above:
>>> np.binary_repr(3)
'11'
>>> np.binary_repr(-3)
'-11'
>>> np.binary_repr(3, width=4)
'0011'
The two’s complement is returned when the input number is negative and width is specified:
>>> np.binary_repr(-3, width=3)
'101'
>>> np.binary_repr(-3, width=5)
'11101'

The accepted answer didn't address negative numbers, which I'll cover.
In addition to the answers above, you can also just use the bin and hex functions. And in the opposite direction, use binary notation:
>>> bin(37)
'0b100101'
>>> 0b100101
37
But with negative numbers, things get a bit more complicated. The question doesn't specify how you want to handle negative numbers.
Python just adds a negative sign so the result for -37 would be this:
>>> bin(-37)
'-0b100101'
In computer/hardware binary data, negative signs don't exist. All we have is 1's and 0's. So if you're reading or producing binary streams of data to be processed by other software/hardware, you need to first know the notation being used.
One notation is sign-magnitude notation, where the first bit represents the negative sign, and the rest is the actual value. In that case, -37 would be 0b1100101 and 37 would be 0b0100101. This looks like what python produces, but just add a 0 or 1 in front for positive / negative numbers.
More common is Two's complement notation, which seems more complicated and the result is very different from python's string formatting. You can read the details in the link, but with an 8bit signed integer -37 would be 0b11011011 and 37 would be 0b00100101.
Python has no easy way to produce these binary representations. You can use numpy to turn Two's complement binary values into python integers:
>>> import numpy as np
>>> np.int8(0b11011011)
-37
>>> np.uint8(0b11011011)
219
>>> np.uint8(0b00100101)
37
>>> np.int8(0b00100101)
37
But I don't know an easy way to do the opposite with builtin functions. The bitstring package can help though.
>>> from bitstring import BitArray
>>> arr = BitArray(int=-37, length=8)
>>> arr.uint
219
>>> arr.int
-37
>>> arr.bin
'11011011'
>>> BitArray(bin='11011011').int
-37
>>> BitArray(bin='11011011').uint
219

Python 3.6 added a new string formatting approach called formatted string literals or “f-strings”.
Example:
name = 'Bob'
number = 42
f"Hello, {name}, your number is {number:>08b}"
Output will be 'Hello, Bob, your number is 00001010!'
A discussion of this question can be found here - Here

Unless I'm misunderstanding what you mean by binary string I think the module you are looking for is struct

n=input()
print(bin(n).replace("0b", ""))

def binary(decimal) :
otherBase = ""
while decimal != 0 :
otherBase = str(decimal % 2) + otherBase
decimal //= 2
return otherBase
print binary(10)
output:
1010

Here is the code I've just implemented. This is not a method but you can use it as a ready-to-use function!
def inttobinary(number):
if number == 0:
return str(0)
result =""
while (number != 0):
remainder = number%2
number = number/2
result += str(remainder)
return result[::-1] # to invert the string

Calculator with all neccessary functions for DEC,BIN,HEX:
(made and tested with Python 3.5)
You can change the input test numbers and get the converted ones.
# CONVERTER: DEC / BIN / HEX
def dec2bin(d):
# dec -> bin
b = bin(d)
return b
def dec2hex(d):
# dec -> hex
h = hex(d)
return h
def bin2dec(b):
# bin -> dec
bin_numb="{0:b}".format(b)
d = eval(bin_numb)
return d,bin_numb
def bin2hex(b):
# bin -> hex
h = hex(b)
return h
def hex2dec(h):
# hex -> dec
d = int(h)
return d
def hex2bin(h):
# hex -> bin
b = bin(h)
return b
## TESTING NUMBERS
numb_dec = 99
numb_bin = 0b0111
numb_hex = 0xFF
## CALCULATIONS
res_dec2bin = dec2bin(numb_dec)
res_dec2hex = dec2hex(numb_dec)
res_bin2dec,bin_numb = bin2dec(numb_bin)
res_bin2hex = bin2hex(numb_bin)
res_hex2dec = hex2dec(numb_hex)
res_hex2bin = hex2bin(numb_hex)
## PRINTING
print('------- DECIMAL to BIN / HEX -------\n')
print('decimal:',numb_dec,'\nbin: ',res_dec2bin,'\nhex: ',res_dec2hex,'\n')
print('------- BINARY to DEC / HEX -------\n')
print('binary: ',bin_numb,'\ndec: ',numb_bin,'\nhex: ',res_bin2hex,'\n')
print('----- HEXADECIMAL to BIN / HEX -----\n')
print('hexadec:',hex(numb_hex),'\nbin: ',res_hex2bin,'\ndec: ',res_hex2dec,'\n')

Somewhat similar solution
def to_bin(dec):
flag = True
bin_str = ''
while flag:
remainder = dec % 2
quotient = dec / 2
if quotient == 0:
flag = False
bin_str += str(remainder)
dec = quotient
bin_str = bin_str[::-1] # reverse the string
return bin_str

here is simple solution using the divmod() fucntion which returns the reminder and the result of a division without the fraction.
def dectobin(number):
bin = ''
while (number >= 1):
number, rem = divmod(number, 2)
bin = bin + str(rem)
return bin

Here's yet another way using regular math, no loops, only recursion. (Trivial case 0 returns nothing).
def toBin(num):
if num == 0:
return ""
return toBin(num//2) + str(num%2)
print ([(toBin(i)) for i in range(10)])
['', '1', '10', '11', '100', '101', '110', '111', '1000', '1001']

To calculate binary of numbers:
print("Binary is {0:>08b}".format(16))
To calculate the Hexa decimal of a number:
print("Hexa Decimal is {0:>0x}".format(15))
To Calculate all the binary no till 16::
for i in range(17):
print("{0:>2}: binary is {0:>08b}".format(i))
To calculate Hexa decimal no till 17
for i in range(17):
print("{0:>2}: Hexa Decimal is {0:>0x}".format(i))
##as 2 digit is enogh for hexa decimal representation of a number

try:
while True:
p = ""
a = input()
while a != 0:
l = a % 2
b = a - l
a = b / 2
p = str(l) + p
print(p)
except:
print ("write 1 number")

I found a method using matrix operation to convert decimal to binary.
import numpy as np
E_mat = np.tile(E,[1,M])
M_order = pow(2,(M-1-np.array(range(M)))).T
bindata = np.remainder(np.floor(E_mat /M_order).astype(np.int),2)
Eis input decimal data,M is the binary orders. bindata is output binary data, which is in a format of 1 by M binary matrix.

Method of generating a string with results from a curve_fit

I have created a class which takes a distribution, and fits it. The method has the option for choosing between a few predefined functions.
As part of printing the class, I print the result of the fit in the form of an equation, where the fit-results and subsequent errors are displayed on the over the figure.
My question is is there a tidy way to handle when a number is negative, such that the string for printing is formed as: "y = mx - c", and not "y = mx + -c".
I developed this with a linear fit, where I simply assess the sign of the constant, and form the string in one of two ways:
def fit_result_string(self, results, errors):
if self.fit_model is utl.linear:
if results[1] > 0:
fit_str = r"y = {:.3}($\pm${:.3})x + {:.3}($\pm${:.3})".format(
results[0],
errors[0],
results[1],
errors[1])
else:
fit_str = r"y = {:.3}($\pm${:.3})x - {:.3}($\pm${:.3})".format(
results[0],
errors[0],
abs(results[1]),
errors[1])
return fit_str
I now want to build this up to also be able to form a string containing the results if the fit model is changed to a 2nd, 3rd, or 4th degree polynomial, while handling the sign of each coefficient.
Is there a better way to do this than using a whole bunch of if-else statements?
Thanks in advance!

Define a function which returns '+' or '-' according to the given number, and call it inside a f-string.
def plus_minus_string(n):
return '+' if n >= 0 else '-'
print(f"y = {m}x {plus_minus_string(c)} {abs(c)}")
Examples:
>>> m = 2
>>> c = 5
>>> print(f"y = {m}x {plus_minus_string(c)} {abs(c)}")
y = 2x + 5
>>> c = -4
>>> print(f"y = {m}x {plus_minus_string(c)} {abs(c)}")
y = 2x - 4
You will need to change it a bit to fit to your code, but it's quite straight-forward I hope.

How to format float to integer if the value is integral. That is, display 13.0 as 13 but 13.5 as 13.5

[Working with Python 3.x]
I'm trying to display 2D line equations. I'm assuming the coefficents or constants to be float because it's possible they can be float. However, if they are integers, I'd like to show them as integers.
That is, instead of
x + 3.0y = 13.0
I want to display
x + 3y = 13
However,
x + 3.5y = 13.5
should stay as is.
How do I do this kind of conditional formatting?

Assumming the function for that will only be passed an exact multiplier (without unknown variable), input and output are strings:
def simplifyFloat(str):
f = float(str)
if f % 1 == 0: #if f has some floating point this is going to be false
f = int(f)
return str(f)
And usage:
equation = '2.0x + 3.5y + 2'
x_part, o, y_part, o, const_part = equation.split(' ') # o variables for dumping operators
# [:-1] before string means you get rid of the last letter, which is 'x' and 'y'
print(simplifyFloat(x_part[:-1])) # output '2'
print(simplifyFloat(y_part)[:-1]) # output '3.5'

There might be more efficient ways to do that, but branching with ceil value works correctly:
import math
number1 = 3.0
number2 = 3.5
def integral_formatting(n):
return n if n != math.ceil(n) else math.ceil(n)
>>> integral_formatting(number1)
3
>>> integral_formatting(number2)
3.5

An efficient way I can come up with, is to make a function that returns integer or float, depending on the case. The function can be like
def check(x):
if int(x) == x:
return int(x)
else:
return float(x)
Now, any number can be put in equation as check(1.0) * x + check(13) * y = check(13.5). This will result in 1x + 13y = 13.5. Hope this helps!

Converting All Redundant Floats in a String to Integers

I'm using Sympy to make a custom function which converts complex square roots into their complex numbers. When I input -sqrt(-2 + 2*sqrt(3)*I) I get the expected output of -1 - sqrt(3)*I, however, inputting -sqrt(-2.0 + 2*sqrt(3)*I) (has a -2.0 instead of -2), I get the output -1.0 - 0.707106781186547*sqrt(6)*I.
I've tried to convert the input expression to a string, gotten rid of the '.0 ' and then executed a piece of code to return it to the type sympy.core.add.Mul, which usually works with other strings, but the variable expression is still a string.
expression = str(input_expression).replace('.0 ', '')
exec(f'expression = {expression}')
How do I get rid of the redundant use of floats in my expression, while maintaining its type of sympy.core.add.Mul, so that my function will give a nice output?
P.S. The number 0.707106781186547 is an approximation of 1/sqrt(2). The fact that this number is present in the second output means that my function is running properly, it just isn't outputting in the desired way.
Edit:
For whatever reason, unindenting and getting rid of the function as a whole, running the code as its own program gives the expected output. It's only when the code is in function form that it doesn't work.
Code as Requested:
from IPython.display import display, Math
from sympy.abc import *
from sympy import *
def imaginary_square_root(x, y):
return(sqrt((x + sqrt(x**2 + y**2)) / (2)) + I*((y*sqrt(2)) / (2*sqrt(x + sqrt(x**2 + y**2))))) # calculates the square root of a complex number
def find_imaginary_square_root(polynomial): # 'polynomial' used because this function is meant to change expressions including variables such as 'x'
polynomial = str(polynomial).replace('.0 ', ' ')
exec(f'polynomial = {polynomial}')
list_of_square_roots = [] # list of string instances of square roots and their contents
list_of_square_root_indexes = [] # list of indexes at which the square roots can be found in the string
polynomial_string = str(polynomial)
temp_polynomial_string = polynomial_string # string used and chopped up, hence the prefix 'temp_...'
current_count = 0 # counter variable used for two seperate jobs
while 'sqrt' in temp_polynomial_string: # gets indexes of every instance of 'sqrt'
list_of_square_root_indexes.append(temp_polynomial_string.index('sqrt') + current_count)
temp_polynomial_string = temp_polynomial_string[list_of_square_root_indexes[-1] + 4:]
current_count += list_of_square_root_indexes[-1] + 4
for square_root_location in list_of_square_root_indexes:
current_count = 1 # second job for 'current_count'
for index, char in enumerate(polynomial_string[square_root_location + 5:]):
if char == '(':
current_count += 1
elif char == ')':
current_count -= 1
if not current_count: # when current_count == 0, we know that the end of the sqrt contents have been reached
list_of_square_roots.append(polynomial_string[square_root_location:square_root_location + index + 6]) # adds the square root with contents to a list
break
for individual_square_root in list_of_square_roots:
if individual_square_root in str(polynomial):
evaluate = individual_square_root[5:-1]
x = re(evaluate)
y = im(evaluate)
polynomial = polynomial.replace(eval(individual_square_root), imaginary_square_root(x, y)) # replace function used here is Sympy's replace function for polynomials
return polynomial
poly = str(-sqrt(-2.0 + 2*sqrt(3)*I))
display(Math(latex(find_imaginary_square_root(poly))))

What exactly are you trying to accomplish? I still do not understand. You have a whole chunck of code. Try this out:
from sympy import *
def parse(expr): print(simplify(expr).evalf().nsimplify())
parse(-sqrt(-2.0 + 2*sqrt(3)*I))
-1 - sqrt(3)*I

I think everything that you're fighting to do here can be made easier with what sympy has built in. First, assuming that you're taking in user given strings, I'd recommend using the built in parser's of sympy. Second, sympy will do this exact calculation for you, although with a caveat.
from sympy.parsing.sympy_parser import parse_expr
def simplify_string(polynomial_str):
polynomial = parse_expr(polynomial_str)
return polynomial.powsimp().evalf()
Usage examples:
>>>simplify_string('-sqrt(-2 + 2*sqrt(3)*I)')
-1.0 - 1.73205080756888*I
>>>simplify_string('sqrt(sqrt(1 + sqrt(2)*I) + I*sqrt(3 - I*sqrt(5)))')
1.54878147282944 + 0.78803305913*I
>>>simpify_string('sqrt((3 + sqrt(2 + sqrt(3)*I)*I)*x**2 + (3 + sqrt(5)*I)*x + I*4)'
(x**2*(3.0 + I*(2.0 + 1.73205080756888*I)**0.5) + x*(3.0 + 2.23606797749979*I) + 4.0*I)**0.5
The problem is, that sympy will either work in floats, or exact. If you want sympy to calculate out the numerical value of a square root, it's going to display what could be an int as a float for clarity. You can't fix the typecasting, but a lot of the work that you're trying to do, sympy has built in under the hood.
Edit
You can use .nsimplify() on the polynomial to bring things back to nice looking numbers if possible, but you won't be able to have both evaluated roots, and nice displays in the same form.

The sqrtdenest batteries are already included. If you replace ints expressed as floats it will work:
>>> from sympy import sqrtdenest, sqrt, Float
>>> eq = -sqrt(-2.0 + 2*sqrt(3)*I)
Define a function that will extract Floats that are equal to ints
>>> intfloats = lambda x: dict([(i,int(i)) for i in x.atoms(Float) if i==int(i)])
Use it to transform eq and then apply the sqrtdenest
>>> eq.xreplace(intfloats(eq))
-sqrt(-2 + 2*sqrt(3)*I)
>>> sqrtdenest(_)
-1 + sqrt(3)
A problem with using nsimplify (or any mass simplification) is that it may do more than you want. It's best to use the most specific transformation as possible to limit the impact (and work).
/!\ sqrtdenest appears to have a problem that I will report: it is dropping the I

Convert hex string to hex number in python without loss of precision

So, I am using the answer to this question to color some values I have for some polygons to plot to a basemap instance. I modified the function found in that link to be the following. The issue I'm having is that I have to convert the string that it returns to a hex digit to use so that I can color the polygons. But when I convert something like "0x00ffaa" to a python hex digit, it changes it to be "0xffaa", which cannot be used to color the polygon
How can I get around this?
Here is the modified function:
def rgb(mini,maxi,value):
mini, maxi, value = float(mini), float(maxi), float(value)
ratio = 2* (value - mini) / (maxi-mini)
b = int(max(0,255*(1-ratio)))
r = int(max(0,255*(ratio -1)))
g = 255 - b - r
b = hex(b)
r = hex(r)
g = hex(g)
if len(b) == 3:
b = b[0:2] + '0' + b[-1]
if len(r) == 3:
r = r[0:2] + '0' + r[-1]
if len(g) == 3:
g = g[0:2] + '0' + g[-1]
string = r+g[2:]+b[2:]
return string

The answer from cdarke is OK, but using the % operator for string interpolation is kind of deprecated. For the sake of completion, here is the format function or the str.format method:
>>> format(254, '06X')
'0000FE'
>>> "#{:06X}".format(255)
'#0000FF'
New code is expected to use one of the above instead of the % operator. If you are curious about "why does Python have a format function as well as a format method?", see my answer to this question.
But usually you don't have to worry about the representation of the value if the function/method you are using takes integers as well as strings, because in this case the string '0x0000AA' is the same as the integer value 0xAA or 170.

Use string formatting, for example:
>>> "0x%08x" % 0xffaa
'0x0000ffaa'