I have python string
wrong_data_type is not one of the allowed values `([one_two, two_three, three_four])`
and I have a regexp:
\w+ is not one of the allowed values`\(\[\w,+\)\]`
However, it is not correct? Any help?
The regexp should be
\w+ is not one of the allowed values `\(\[(?:\w+, )*\w+\]\)`
Fixes:
Added space after values.
\]\) at the end instead of \)\].
Inside the brackets, need to allow multiple \w, so it should be \w+.
Need to have a space after ,.
Need a group around \w+, to match multiple comma-separated words using the * quantifier.
Then have to match a single last word with no comma after it.
data = re.search(r'\(\[[\w,\s]+\]\)', string).group()
You can use the following:
\w+ is not one of the allowed values `\(\[[\w,\s]+\]\)`
Related
In Python regex, how would I match only the facebook.com...777 substrings given either string? I don't want the ?sfnsn=mo at the end.
I have (?<=https://m\.)([^\s]+) to match everything after the https://m.. I also have (?=\?sfnsn) to match every thing in front of ?sfnsn.
How do I combine the regex to only return the facebook.com...777 part for either string.
have: https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=123456789&id=7777777777?sfnsn=mo
want: facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=123456789&id=7777777777
have: https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=123456789&id=7777777777
want: facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=123456789&id=7777777777
Here's what I was messing around with https://regex101.com/r/WYz5dn/2
(?<=https://m\.)([^\s]+)(?=\?sfnsn)
You could use a capturing group instead of a positive lookbehind and match either ?sfnsn or the end of the string.
https://m\.(\S*?)(?:\?sfnsn|$)
Regex demo
Using the lookarounds, the pattern could be:
(?<=https://m\.)\S*?(?=\?sfnsn|$)
Regex demo
Putting a ? at the end works, since the last grouped lookahead may or may not exist, we put a question mark after it:
(?<=https://m\.)([^\s]+)(?=\?sfnsn)?
I have a string "F(foo)", and I'd like to replace that string with "F('foo')". I know we can also use regular expression in the second parameter and do this replacement using re.sub(r"F\(foo\)", r"F\('foo'\)",str). But the problem here is, foo is a dynamic string variable. It is different every time we want to do this replacement. Is it possible by some sort of regex, to do such replacement in a cleaner way?
I remember one way to extract foo using () and then .group(1). But this would require me to define one more temporary variable just to store foo. I'm curious if there is a way by which we can replace "F(foo)" with "F('foo')" in a single line or in other words in a more cleaner way.
Examples :
F(name) should be replaced with F('name').
F(id) should be replaced with F('id').
G(name) should not be replaced.
So, the regex would be r"F\((\w)+\)" to find such strings.
Using re.sub
Ex:
import re
s = "F(foo)"
print(re.sub(r"\((.*)\)", r"('\1')", s))
Output:
F('foo')
The following regex encloses valid [Python|C|Java] identifiers after F and in parentheses in single quotation marks:
re.sub(r"F\(([_a-z][_a-z0-9]+)\)", r"F('\1')", s, flags=re.I)
#"F('foo')"
There are several ways, depending on what foo actually is.
If it can't contain ( or ), you can just replace ( with (' and ) with '). Otherwise, try using
re.sub(r"F\((.*)\)", r"F('\1')", yourstring)
where the \1 in the replacement part will reference the (.*) capture group in the search regex
In your pattern F\((\w)+\) you are almost there, you just need to put the quantifier + after the \w to repeat matching 1+ word characters.
If you put it after the capturing group, you repeat the group which will give you the value of the last iteration in the capturing group which would be the second o in foo.
You could update your expression to:
F\((\w+)\)
And in the replacement refer to the capturing group using \1
F('\1')
For example:
import re
str = "F(foo)"
print(re.sub(r"F\((\w+)\)", r"F('\1')", str)) # F('foo')
Python demo
I want to match the string:
from string as string
It may or may not contain as.
The current code I have is
r'(?ix) from [a-z0-9_]+ [as ]* [a-z0-9_]+'
But this code matches a single a or s. So something like from string a little will also be in the result.
I wonder what is the correct way of doing this.
You may use
(?i)from\s+[a-z0-9_]+\s+(?:as\s+)?[a-z0-9_]+
See the regex demo
Note that you use x "verbose" (free spacing) modifier, and all spaces in your pattern became formatting whitespaces that the re engine omits when parsing the pattern. Thus, I suggest using \s+ to match 1 or more whitespaces. If you really want to use single regular spaces, just omit the x modifier and use the regular space. If you need the x modifier to insert comments, escape the regular spaces:
r'(?ix) from\ [a-z0-9_]+\ (?:as\ )?[a-z0-9_]+'
Also, to match a sequence of chars, you need to use a grouping construct rather than a character class. Here, (?:as\s+)? defines an optional non-capturing group that matches 1 or 0 occurrences of as + space substring.
It's the first time that I'm using regular expressions in Python and I just can't get it to work.
Here is what I want to achieve: I want to find all strings, where there is a word followed by a dot followed by another word. After that an unknown number of whitespaces followed by either (off) or (on). For example:
word1.word2 (off)
Here is what I have come up so far.
string_group = re.search(r'\w+\.\w+\s+[(\(on\))(\(off\))]', analyzed_string)
\w+ for the first word
\. for the dot
\w+ for the second word
\s+ for the whitespaces
[(\(on\))(\(off\))] for the (off) or (on)
I think that the last expression might not be doing what I need it to. With the implementation right now, the program does find the right place in the string, but the output of
string_group.group(0)
Is just
word1.word2 (
instead of the whole expression I'm looking for. Could you please give me a hint what I am doing wrong?
[ ... ] is used for character class, and will match any one character inside them unless you put a quantifier: [ ... ]+ for one or more time.
But simply adding that won't work...
\w+\.\w+\s+[(\(on\))(\(off\))]+
Will match garbage stuff like word1.word2 )(fno(nofn too, so you actually don't want to use a character class, because it'll match the characters in any order. What you can use is a capturing group, and a non-capturing group along with an OR operator |:
\w+\.\w+\s+(\((?:on|off)\))
(?:on|off) will match either on or off
Now, if you don't like the parentheses, to be caught too in the first group, you can change that to:
\w+\.\w+\s+\((on|off)\)
You've got your logical OR mixed up.
[(\(on\))(\(off\))]
should be
\((?:on|off)\)
[]s are just for matching single characters.
The square brackets are a character class, which matches any one of the characters in the brackets. You appear to be trying to use it to match one of the sub-regexes (\(one\)) and (\(two\)). The way to do that is with an alternation operation, the pipe symbol: (\(one\)|\(two\)).
I think your problem may be with the square brackets []
they indicate a set of single characters to match. So your expression would match a single instance of any of the following chars: "()ofn"
So for the string "word1.word2 (on)", you are matching only this part: "word1.word2 ("
Try using this one instead:
re.search(r'\w+\.\w+\s+\((on|off)\)', analyzed_string)
This match assumes that the () will be there, and looks for either "on" or "off" inside the parenthesis.
I'm looking for an OR capability to match on several strings with regular expressions.
# I would like to find either "-hex", "-mos", or "-sig"
# the result would be -hex, -mos, or -sig
# You see I want to get rid of the double quotes around these three strings.
# Other double quoting is OK.
# I'd like something like.
messWithCommandArgs = ' -o {} "-sig" "-r" "-sip" '
messWithCommandArgs = re.sub(
r'"(-[hex|mos|sig])"',
r"\1",
messWithCommandArgs)
This works:
messWithCommandArgs = re.sub(
r'"(-sig)"',
r"\1",
messWithCommandArgs)
Square brackets are for character classes that can only match a single character. If you want to match multiple character alternatives you need to use a group (parentheses instead of square brackets). Try changing your regex to the following:
r'"(-(?:hex|mos|sig))"'
Note that I used a non-capturing group (?:...) because you don't need another capture group, but r'"(-(hex|mos|sig))"' would actually work the same way since \1 would still be everything but the quotes.
Alternative you could use r'"-(hex|mos|sig)"' and use r"-\1" as the replacement (since the - is no longer a part of the group.
You should remove [] metacharacters in order to match hex or mos or sig. (?:-(hex|mos|sig))