I wanted to search a string for a substring beginning with ">"
Does this syntax say what I want it to say: this character followed by anything.
regex_firstline = re.compile("[>]{1}.*")
As a pythonic way for such tasks you can use str.startswith() method, and don't need to use regex.
But about your regex "[>]{1}.*" you don't need {1} after your character class and you can specify the start of your regex with anchor ^.So it can be "^>.*"
Using http://regex101.com:
[>]{1} matches the single character > literally exactly one time (but it denotes {1} is a meaningless quantifier), and
.* then matches any character as many times as possible.
If a list was provided inside square brackets (as opposed to a single character), regex would attempt to match a single character within the list exactly one time. http://regex101.com has a good listing of tokens and what they mean.
An ideal regex expression would be ^[>].*, meaning at the beginning of a string find exactly one > character followed by anything else (and with only one character in the square brackets, you can remove those to simplify it even further: ^>.*
Related
I am starting to learn python spider to download some pictures on the web and I found the code as follows. I know some basic regex.
I knew \.jpg means .jpg and | means or. what's the meaning of [^\s]*? of the first line? I am wondering why using \s?
And what's the difference between the two regexes?
http:[^\s]*?(\.jpg|\.png|\.gif)
http://.*?(\.jpg|\.png|\.gif)
Alright, so to answer your first question, I'll break down [^\s]*?.
The square brackets ([]) indicate a character class. A character class basically means that you want to match anything in the class, at that position, one time. [abc] will match the strings a, b, and c. In this case, your character class is negated using the caret (^) at the beginning - this inverts its meaning, making it match anything but the characters in it.
\s is fairly simple - it's a common shorthand in many regex flavours for "any whitespace character". This includes spaces, tabs, and newlines.
*? is a little harder to explain. The * quantifier is fairly simple - it means "match this token (the character class in this case) zero or more times". The ?, when applied to a quantifier, makes it lazy - it will match as little as it can, going from left to right one character at a time.
In this case, what the whole pattern snippet [^\s]*? means is "match any sequence of non-whitespace characters, including the empty string". As mentioned in the comments, this can more succinctly be written as \S*?.
To answer the second part of your question, I'll compare the two regexes you give:
http:[^\s]*?(\.jpg|\.png|\.gif)
http://.*?(\.jpg|\.png|\.gif)
They both start the same way: attempting to match the protocol at the beginning of a URL and the subsequent colon (:) character. The first then matches any string that does not contain any whitespace and ends with the specified file extensions. The second, meanwhile, will match two literal slash characters (/) before matching any sequence of characters followed by a valid extension.
Now, it's obvious that both patterns are meant to match a URL, but both are incorrect. The first pattern, for instance, will match strings like
http:foo.bar.png
http:.png
Both of which are invalid. Likewise, the second pattern will permit spaces, allowing stuff like this:
http:// .jpg
http://foo bar.png
Which is equally illegal in valid URLs. A better regex for this (though I caution strongly against trying to match URLs with regexes) might look like:
https?://\S+\.(jpe?g|png|gif)
In this case, it'll match URLs starting with both http and https, as well as files that end in both variations of jpg.
It's the first time that I'm using regular expressions in Python and I just can't get it to work.
Here is what I want to achieve: I want to find all strings, where there is a word followed by a dot followed by another word. After that an unknown number of whitespaces followed by either (off) or (on). For example:
word1.word2 (off)
Here is what I have come up so far.
string_group = re.search(r'\w+\.\w+\s+[(\(on\))(\(off\))]', analyzed_string)
\w+ for the first word
\. for the dot
\w+ for the second word
\s+ for the whitespaces
[(\(on\))(\(off\))] for the (off) or (on)
I think that the last expression might not be doing what I need it to. With the implementation right now, the program does find the right place in the string, but the output of
string_group.group(0)
Is just
word1.word2 (
instead of the whole expression I'm looking for. Could you please give me a hint what I am doing wrong?
[ ... ] is used for character class, and will match any one character inside them unless you put a quantifier: [ ... ]+ for one or more time.
But simply adding that won't work...
\w+\.\w+\s+[(\(on\))(\(off\))]+
Will match garbage stuff like word1.word2 )(fno(nofn too, so you actually don't want to use a character class, because it'll match the characters in any order. What you can use is a capturing group, and a non-capturing group along with an OR operator |:
\w+\.\w+\s+(\((?:on|off)\))
(?:on|off) will match either on or off
Now, if you don't like the parentheses, to be caught too in the first group, you can change that to:
\w+\.\w+\s+\((on|off)\)
You've got your logical OR mixed up.
[(\(on\))(\(off\))]
should be
\((?:on|off)\)
[]s are just for matching single characters.
The square brackets are a character class, which matches any one of the characters in the brackets. You appear to be trying to use it to match one of the sub-regexes (\(one\)) and (\(two\)). The way to do that is with an alternation operation, the pipe symbol: (\(one\)|\(two\)).
I think your problem may be with the square brackets []
they indicate a set of single characters to match. So your expression would match a single instance of any of the following chars: "()ofn"
So for the string "word1.word2 (on)", you are matching only this part: "word1.word2 ("
Try using this one instead:
re.search(r'\w+\.\w+\s+\((on|off)\)', analyzed_string)
This match assumes that the () will be there, and looks for either "on" or "off" inside the parenthesis.
I want to write a regex to check if a word ends in anything except s,x,y,z,ch,sh or a vowel, followed by an s. Here's my failed attempt:
re.match(r".*[^ s|x|y|z|ch|sh|a|e|i|o|u]s",s)
What is the correct way to complement a group of characters?
Non-regex solution using str.endswith:
>>> from itertools import product
>>> tup = tuple(''.join(x) for x in product(('s','x','y','z','ch','sh'), 's'))
>>> 'foochf'.endswith(tup)
False
>>> 'foochs'.endswith(tup)
True
[^ s|x|y|z|ch|sh|a|e|i|o|u]
This is an inverted character class. Character classes match single characters, so in your case, it will match any character, except one of these: acehiosuxyz |. Note that it will not respect compound groups like ch and sh and the | are actually interpreted as pipe characters which just appear multiple time in the character class (where duplicates are just ignored).
So this is actually equivalent to the following character class:
[^acehiosuxyz |]
Instead, you will have to use a negative look behind to make sure that a trailing s is not preceded by any of the character sequences:
.*(?<!.[ sxyzaeiou]|ch|sh)s
This one has the problem that it will not be able to match two character words, as, to be able to use look behinds, the look behind needs to have a fixed size. And to include both the single characters and the two-character groups in the look behind, I had to add another character to the single character matches. You can however use two separate look behinds instead:
.*(?<![ sxyzaeiou])(?<!ch|sh)s
As LarsH mentioned in the comments, if you really want to match words that end with this, you should add some kind of boundary at the end of the expression. If you want to match the end of the string/line, you should add a $, and otherwise you should at least add a word boundary \b to make sure that the word actually ends there.
It looks like you need a negative lookbehind here:
import re
rx = r'(?<![sxyzaeiou])(?<!ch|sh)s$'
print re.search(rx, 'bots') # ok
print re.search(rx, 'boxs') # None
Note that re doesn't support variable-width LBs, therefore you need two of them.
How about
re.search("([^sxyzaeiouh]|[^cs]h)s$", s)
Using search() instead of match() means the match doesn't have to begin at the beginning of the string, so we can eliminate the .*.
This is assuming that the end of the word is the end of the string; i.e. we don't have to check for a word boundary.
It also assumes that you don't need to match the "word" hs, even it conforms literally to your rules. If you want to match that as well, you could add another alternative:
re.search("([^sxyzaeiouh]|[^cs]|^h)s$", s)
But again, we're assuming that the beginning of the word is the beginning of the string.
Note that the raw string notation, r"...", is unecessary here (but harmless). It only helps when you have backslashes in the regexp, so that you don't have to escape them in the string notation.
'[A-Za-z0-9-_]*'
'^[A-Za-z0-9-_]*$'
I want to check if a string only contains the sign in the above expression, just want to make sure no more weird sign like #%&/() are in the strings.
I am wondering if there's any difference between these two regular expression? Did the beginning and ending sign matter? Will it affect the result somehow?
Python regular expressions are anchored at the beginning of strings (like in many other languages): hence the ^ sign at the beginning doesn’t make any difference. However, the $ sign does very much make one: if you don’t include it, you’re only going to match the beginning of your string, and the end could contain anything – including the characters you want to exclude. Just try re.match("[a-z0-9]", "abcdef/%&").
In addition to that, you may want to use a regular expression that simply excludes the characters you’re testing for, it’s much safe (hence [^#%&/()] – or maybe you have to do something to escape the parentheses; can’t remember how it works at the moment).
The beginning and end sign match the beginning and end of a String.
The first will match any String that contains zero or more ocurrences of the class [A-Za-z0-9-_] (basically any string whatsoever...).
The second will match an empty String, but not one that contains characters not defined in [A-Za-z0-9-_]
Yes it will. A regex can match anywhere in its input. # will match in your first regex.
I'm trying to use regular expressions to find three or more of the same character in a string. So for example:
'hello' would not match
'ohhh' would.
I've tried doing things like:
re.compile('(?!.*(.)\1{3,})^[a-zA-Z]*$')
re.compile('(\w)\1{5,}')
but neither seem to work.
(\w)\1{2,} is the regex you are looking for.
In Python it could be quoted like r"(\w)\1{2,}"
if you're looking for the same character three times consecutively, you can do this:
(\w)\1\1
if you want to find the same character three times anywhere in the string, you need to put a dot and an asterisk between the parts of the expression above, like so:
(\w).*\1.*\1
The .* matches any number of any character, so this expression should match any string which has any single word character that appears three or more times, with any number of any characters in between them.
Hope that helps.