mac following brew install python warning thrown unstable state - python

Pundits warn against installing python in a mac usr/bin/Frameworks area.
Python self-installers write to Framework by default.
pundits advise using brew install of python to avoid the above.
Brew install python however, results in unstable state
Idle reports tclsh mismatch.
Pundits advise active state installer of correct tclsh. These are high-level python cognoscenti, and real pundits, lilies amidst the thorns.
Active-state installs to Frameworks (can you imagine?).
The said installer allows no other installation directory.
Brew installed python fails to see the active-state tclsh.
However, if one of you admonitory pundits could help me with a logical, non-idiomatic description of a process that will associate the appropriate "tclsh" in usr/bin with python3 in usr/local/bin, I would be ecstatic.

Homebrew's Python build will only attempt to recognize brewed or system Tcl/Tk. To build against Homebrew's Tcl/Tk (and install it first if necessary), install Python with brew install python3 --with-tcl-tk.

Related

unable to install pymorph

I'm trying to install 'pymorph' on mac os x with 'PIP':
sudo pip install pymorph
I'm getting the following error:
NameError: name 'execfile' is not defined
Command "python setup.py egg_info" failed with error code 1 in
/private/tmp/pip-build-9hjd5tfm/pymorph/
I have read that using a python version different from 2.7 could lead to this kind of problem. Yet, I'm using the 2.7 version:
python --version
Python 2.7.13
Any ideas to solve this issue ?
Thank you in advance
It's possible to have a pip command on your PATH that comes from a different Python installation than the python command. (Each entry script to a Python-based tool is bound to the Python installation that was used to install the package that provided it. This means that the pip command does not search PATH for a python installation.) If this pip comes up later on PATH than python, it would lead to behaviour that you describe.
This can happen, say, if you first install a Python 2.7 without pip, and then a Python 3.x with pip, if the installers prepend to PATH.
You can verify which version of Python pip is using and where it's installed by running pip -V.
The robust solution to this should be using a virtual environment that lets you tie the base python installation and libraries specific to your application alone with your project, as well as avoid cluttering your global site-packages, and prevent inadvertent compatibility issues from different versions of the same package being needed by different projects.
It seems that the current (as of late 2017) recommended virtual environment solution is Pipenv. A decent-looking introduction to virtual environments using Pipenv, by the author of Pipenv, can be found here.

How do I link the ActiveState distribution of Tcl/Tk to HomeBrew installed Python

I am using macOS 10.12.1 Sierra. I am using Python 2.7.12 installed with
brew install python
but the IDLE gives the warning
WARNING: The version of Tcl/Tk (8.5.9) in use may be unstable.
Visit http://www.python.org/download/mac/tcltk/ for current information.
and sure enough, it crashed frequently. 8.5.9 is the macOS preinstalled version.
I can download the stable 8.5.18 from the ActiveState website (as recommend by python, which works with the python installations from python.org (as they look for any other version of Tcl/Tk before resorting to the unstable macOS default 8.5.9).
However this download does not affect the brew installed python IDLE, which continues to use 8.5.9.
Is there anything I can do to link the updated Tcl/Tk with Homebrew, or can I install Tcl/Tk direct with homebrew?
I have also noticed that exactly the same problem happens when using anaconda python, which uses the preinstalled mac tcl/tk 8.5.9, not the user-installed tcl/tk 8.5.18
tcl-tk can be installed via Homebrew and one can have the Homebrew installed python linked to that version (Homebrew installed) of tcl-tk.
The only "barrier" to that, is to enable the right homebrew tap, as tcl-tk is not found in the "default" taps in Homebrew.
Indeed tcl-tk is found in the tap called homebrew-dupes which contain (cite the page)
formulae that duplicate software provided by macOS, though may provide more recent or bugfix versions.
Here the link to homebrew-dupes:
https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-dupes
and here the formula for tcl-tk
https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-dupes/blob/master/tcl-tk.rb
So the complete recipe to solve the problem would be:
Activate/Install the homebrew-dupes tap
Install tcl-tk
Install homebrew python using homebrew tcl-tk
The commands to be executed follow:
brew tap homebrew/dupes
brew install tcl-tk
brew install python --with-tcl-tk
Homebrew is an excellent package manager and while installing any package it is recommended to see the info.
brew info python
shows a lot of options that can be passed; but the most important one is
--with-tcl-tk
Use Homebrew's Tk instead of macOS Tk (has optional Cocoa and threads support)
I can think of a couple of messy solutions -
1) Insert the actual location of the installed module at the beginning of the path
import sys
sys.path.insert(1, 'YourTclLocation')
2) Append the new location and remove the previous location
import sys
sys.path.append('YourTCLLocation')
sys.path.remove('ProblemLocation')
import Tcl
3) Set PYTHONPATH environment variable in bash and make sure it doesn't have the broken location

How to install Numpy & pip3 for python3.x when they were installed in python2.7? Using Conda?

I want to write program in python3 (3.5), hence I installed python3 next to the pre-installed python2 (2.7) on Mac OS X El Captian.
Since my terminal runs python2.7 by default and Numpy is already installed for it, I put alias python=python3 and expected to be able to install Numpy for python3. when I type pip install numpy. This was the generated message:
Requirement already satisfied (use --upgrade to upgrade): numpy in /Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages
I also noticed that I have no pip3 even though I am using python3: python --version returned Python 3.5.2, but pip3 install numpy got me -bash: pip3: command not found.
So my questions are:
1) How to install Numpy for python3.x when Numpy is installed on python2.x?
2) How to get pip3?
3) Is it better to use virtual environments, such as Conda, instead of juggling between python2 and python3 on the system?
Thank you from a total n00b
------------------- Update -------------------
Reinstalling python3 also fixed another problem in my case.
When I ran brew doctor, one of the warning message I got was:
Warning: You have unlinked kegs in your Cellar Leaving kegs unlinked can lead to build-trouble and cause brews that depend on those kegs to fail to run properly once built. Run brew link on these: python –
This is a result of me running brew unlink python in order to fix
"Python quit unexpectedly"
when I launch Vim and also
"The ycmd server SHUT DOWN"
Both seem to relate to the YouCompleteMe autocomplete plugin which I downloaded for Python.
I got my idea of removing symlinks from here and here
However, Homebrew evidently did not like the absence of those 39 symlinks.
After uninstall (brew uninstall python3) and then re-install python3 (brew install python3) as Toby suggested, Homebrew gave me
You can install Python packages with
pip3 install <package>
Then when I pip3 install numpy and pip3 install scipy, both executed successfully.
To my surprise, symlinks created during Python installation used to cause aforementioned error messages for Python and YouCompleteMe, but now I open python files using Vim without crash from a fresh Python installation, which definitely created the symlinks.
------------------- Update2 ------------------
After re-installing Anaconda2, the same YouCompleteMe error came back. I suspect Anaconda messed up symlinks.
I would recommend using the Anaconda Python distribution.
The main reasons are as such:
You will have a Python distribution that comes with numpy and the rest of the Scientific Python stack.
The Anaconda Python will be installed under your home directory, with no need for sudo-ing to install other packages.
conda install [put_packagename_here] works alongside pip install [put_packagename_here]; conda install is much 'cleaner' (IMHO, differing opinions are welcome).
If you have a Python 3 environment as your default, then pip works out-of-the-box without needing to remember to do pip3.
conda environments are easier to manage than virtualenv environments, in my opinion. And yes, you can have Python 2 alongside Python 3.
I once messed up my system Python environment - the one that came with my Mac - and it broke iPhoto (back in the day). Since then, I became convinced of needing separate, atomic environments for different projects.
I've detailed more reasons in a personal blog post.
Other distributions, of course, are all good, provided they give you what you need :).
The simplest way on a Mac is with Homebrew:
http://brew.sh/
Install Homebrew, then run:
brew install python3 pip3
Edit --
Python3 includes pip3, but Homebrew occasionally has trouble linking to the correct versions, depending on what has been installed. Running the following command:
brew doctor
And if you see errors relating to python or unlinked kegs, try running:
brew uninstall python python3
And reinstalling after checking brew doctor.
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/233519/pip3-linked-to-python-framework-instead-of-homebrew-usr-local-bin

Where did python3.4 download to on my mac?

I decided today I better download python 3.4. So I go to the python/downloads page and do that. Now I am trying to make a new virtualenv using my new python module, mkvirtualenv -p python3.4 sandbox, but I get an error that it can't find my python executable.
The executable /Users/croberts/python3.4 (from --python=/Users/croberts/python3.4) does not exist
This is understandable, but I can't figure out where it is. The old versions of python are in /usr/bin/ but the new one didn't get installed there. How do you search for where a program is using the terminal?
According to the ReadMe.txt bundled with the installer, Python installs default to /Library/frameworks/Python.framework. I just did a test install and it ended up here specifically:
/Library/frameworks/Python.framework/versions/3.4/Python
Unless you changed the settings on the installer, that's where it should live. (If you installed it from source, I'd assume you'd know where you put it.) Something to note is that if you use Homebrew (and possibly other OSX package managers like MacPorts, though I haven't used it), installing Python through the PPC installer will cause a warning:
Warning: Python is installed at /Library/Frameworks/Python.framework
Homebrew only supports building against the System-provided Python or a
brewed Python. In particular, Pythons installed to /Library can interfere
with other software installs.
So if you do use Homebrew (and it's great), it's best to simply use brew install python3, which will put it into /usr/local/bin. Then you can alias python (or python3) to that version, instead.

What is the most compatible way to install python modules on a Mac?

I'm starting to learn python and loving it. I work on a Mac mainly as well as Linux. I'm finding that on Linux (Ubuntu 9.04 mostly) when I install a python module using apt-get it works fine. I can import it with no trouble.
On the Mac, I'm used to using Macports to install all the Unixy stuff. However, I'm finding that most of the python modules I install with it are not being seen by python. I've spent some time playing around with PATH settings and using python_select . Nothing has really worked and at this point I'm not really understanding, instead I'm just poking around.
I get the impression that Macports isn't universally loved for managing python modules. I'd like to start fresh using a more "accepted" (if that's the right word) approach.
So, I was wondering, what is the method that Mac python developers use to manage their modules?
Bonus questions:
Do you use Apple's python, or some other version?
Do you compile everything from source or is there a package manger that works well (Fink?).
The most popular way to manage python packages (if you're not using your system package manager) is to use setuptools and easy_install. It is probably already installed on your system. Use it like this:
easy_install django
easy_install uses the Python Package Index which is an amazing resource for python developers. Have a look around to see what packages are available.
A better option is pip, which is gaining traction, as it attempts to fix a lot of the problems associated with easy_install. Pip uses the same package repository as easy_install, it just works better. Really the only time use need to use easy_install is for this command:
easy_install pip
After that, use:
pip install django
At some point you will probably want to learn a bit about virtualenv. If you do a lot of python development on projects with conflicting package requirements, virtualenv is a godsend. It will allow you to have completely different versions of various packages, and switch between them easily depending your needs.
Regarding which python to use, sticking with Apple's python will give you the least headaches, but If you need a newer version (Leopard is 2.5.1 I believe), I would go with the macports python 2.6.
Your question is already three years old and there are some details not covered in other answers:
Most people I know use HomeBrew or MacPorts, I prefer MacPorts because of its clean cut of what is a default Mac OS X environment and my development setup. Just move out your /opt folder and test your packages with a normal user Python environment
MacPorts is only portable within Mac, but with easy_install or pip you will learn how to setup your environment in any platform (Win/Mac/Linux/Bsd...). Furthermore it will always be more up to date and with more packages
I personally let MacPorts handle my Python modules to keep everything updated. Like any other high level package manager (ie: apt-get) it is much better for the heavy lifting of modules with lots of binary dependencies. There is no way I would build my Qt bindings (PySide) with easy_install or pip. Qt is huge and takes a lot to compile. As soon as you want a Python package that needs a library used by non Python programs, try to avoid easy_install or pip
At some point you will find that there are some packages missing within MacPorts. I do not believe that MacPorts will ever give you the whole CheeseShop. For example, recently I needed the Elixir module, but MacPorts only offers py25-elixir and py26-elixir, no py27 version. In cases like these you have:
pip-2.7 install --user elixir
( make sure you always type pip-(version) )
That will build an extra Python library in your home dir. Yes, Python will work with more than one library location: one controlled by MacPorts and a user local one for everything missing within MacPorts.
Now notice that I favor pip over easy_install. There is a good reason you should avoid setuptools and easy_install. Here is a good explanation and I try to keep away from them. One very useful feature of pip is giving you a list of all the modules (along their versions) that you installed with MacPorts, easy_install and pip itself:
pip-2.7 freeze
If you already started using easy_install, don't worry, pip can recognize everything done already by easy_install and even upgrade the packages installed with it.
If you are a developer keep an eye on virtualenv for controlling different setups and combinations of module versions. Other answers mention it already, what is not mentioned so far is the Tox module, a tool for testing that your package installs correctly with different Python versions.
Although I usually do not have version conflicts, I like to have virtualenv to set up a clean environment and get a clear view of my packages dependencies. That way I never forget any dependencies in my setup.py
If you go for MacPorts be aware that multiple versions of the same package are not selected anymore like the old Debian style with an extra python_select package (it is still there for compatibility). Now you have the select command to choose which Python version will be used (you can even select the Apple installed ones):
$ port select python
Available versions for python:
none
python25-apple
python26-apple
python27 (active)
python27-apple
python32
$ port select python python32
Add tox on top of it and your programs should be really portable
Please see Python OS X development environment. The best way is to use MacPorts. Download and install MacPorts, then install Python via MacPorts by typing the following commands in the Terminal:
sudo port install python26 python_select
sudo port select --set python python26
OR
sudo port install python30 python_select
sudo port select --set python python30
Use the first set of commands to install Python 2.6 and the second set to install Python 3.0. Then use:
sudo port install py26-packagename
OR
sudo port install py30-packagename
In the above commands, replace packagename with the name of the package, for example:
sudo port install py26-setuptools
These commands will automatically install the package (and its dependencies) for the given Python version.
For a full list of available packages for Python, type:
port list | grep py26-
OR
port list | grep py30-
Which command you use depends on which version of Python you chose to install.
I use MacPorts to install Python and any third-party modules tracked by MacPorts into /opt/local, and I install any manually installed modules (those not in the MacPorts repository) into /usr/local, and this has never caused any problems. I think you may be confused as to the use of certain MacPorts scripts and environment variables.
MacPorts python_select is used to select the "current" version of Python, but it has nothing to do with modules. This allows you to, e.g., install both Python 2.5 and Python 2.6 using MacPorts, and switch between installs.
The $PATH environment variables does not affect what Python modules are loaded. $PYTHONPATH is what you are looking for. $PYTHONPATH should point to directories containing Python modules you want to load. In my case, my $PYTHONPATH variable contains /usr/local/lib/python26/site-packages. If you use MacPorts' Python, it sets up the other proper directories for you, so you only need to add additional paths to $PYTHONPATH. But again, $PATH isn't used at all when Python searches for modules you have installed.
$PATH is used to find executables, so if you install MacPorts' Python, make sure /opt/local/bin is in your $PATH.
There's nothing wrong with using a MacPorts Python installation. If you are installing python modules from MacPorts but then not seeing them, that likely means you are not invoking the MacPorts python you installed to. In a terminal shell, you can use absolute paths to invoke the various Pythons that may be installed. For example:
$ /usr/bin/python2.5 # Apple-supplied 2.5 (Leopard)
$ /opt/local/bin/python2.5 # MacPorts 2.5
$ /opt/local/bin/python2.6 # MacPorts 2.6
$ /usr/local/bin/python2.6 # python.org (MacPython) 2.6
$ /usr/local/bin/python3.1 # python.org (MacPython) 3.1
To get the right python by default requires ensuring your shell $PATH is set properly to ensure that the right executable is found first. Another solution is to define shell aliases to the various pythons.
A python.org (MacPython) installation is fine, too, as others have suggested. easy_install can help but, again, because each Python instance may have its own easy_install command, make sure you are invoking the right easy_install.
If you use Python from MacPorts, it has it's own easy_install located at: /opt/local/bin/easy_install-2.6 (for py26, that is). It's not the same one as simply calling easy_install directly, even if you used python_select to change your default python command.
Have you looked into easy_install at all? It won't synchronize your macports or anything like that, but it will automatically download the latest package and all necessary dependencies, i.e.
easy_install nose
for the nose unit testing package, or
easy_install trac
for the trac bug tracker.
There's a bit more information on their EasyInstall page too.
For MacPython installations, I found an effective solution to fixing the problem with setuptools (easy_install) in this blog post:
http://droidism.com/getting-running-with-django-and-macpython-26-on-leopard
One handy tip includes finding out which version of python is active in the terminal:
which python
When you install modules with MacPorts, it does not go into Apple's version of Python. Instead those modules are installed onto the MacPorts version of Python selected.
You can change which version of Python is used by default using a mac port called python_select. instructions here.
Also, there's easy_install. Which will use python to install python modules.
You may already have pip3 pre-installed, so just try it!
Regarding which python version to use, Mac OS usually ships an old version of python. It's a good idea to upgrade to a newer version. You can download a .dmg from http://www.python.org/download/ . If you do that, remember to update the path. You can find the exact commands here http://farmdev.com/thoughts/66/python-3-0-on-mac-os-x-alongside-2-6-2-5-etc-/
I use easy_install with Apple's Python, and it works like a charm.
Directly install one of the fink packages (Django 1.6 as of 2013-Nov)
fink install django-py27
fink install django-py33
Or create yourself a virtualenv:
fink install virtualenv-py27
virtualenv django-env
source django-env/bin/activate
pip install django
deactivate # when you are done
Or use fink django plus any other pip installed packages in a virtualenv
fink install django-py27
fink install virtualenv-py27
virtualenv django-env --system-site-packages
source django-env/bin/activate
# django already installed
pip install django-analytical # or anything else you might want
deactivate # back to your normally scheduled programming

Categories

Resources