I'm trying to produce adversarial examples for a semantic segmentation classifier, which involves optimising an image based using the gradients of the loss with respect to the input image variable (where loss is between the current and goal network outputs).
However, no matter what I've tried, I can't seem to create the graph in a way that allows these gradients to be calculated. I need to ensure that the calculated network output for each iteration of the image is not disconnected from the loss.
Here is the code. I've not included absolutely everything as it would be nightmarishly long. The model builder is a method from the code suite I'm trying to adapt. I'm sure that this must be some kind of trivial misunderstanding on my part.
#From elsewhere - x is the processed input image and yg is calculated using argmin on the output
#of a previous run through the network.
x = self.xclean
self.get_ygoal()
yg = self.ygoal
yg = tf.convert_to_tensor(yg)
tf.reset_default_graph()
config = tf.ConfigProto()
config.gpu_options.allow_growth = True
with tf.Session(config=config) as sess:
#sess.run(tf.global_variables_initializer())
net_input = tf.placeholder(tf.float32,shape=[None,None,None,3])
net_output = tf.placeholder(tf.float32,shape=[None,None,None,self.num_classes])
network, _ = model_builder.build_model(self.model, net_input=net_input,
num_classes=self.num_classes,
crop_width=self.dims[0],
crop_height=self.dims[1],
is_training=True)
print('Loading model checkpoint weights')
checkpoint_path = 'checkpoints/latest_model_'+self.model+'_'+self.dataset+'.ckpt'
saver=tf.train.Saver(max_to_keep=1000)
saver.restore(sess, checkpoint_path)
img = tf.Variable(tf.zeros(shape=(1,self.dims[0], self.dims[1], 3)),name='img')
assign = tf.assign(img,net_input)
learning_rate = tf.constant(lr,dtype=tf.float32)
loss = tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits_v2(logits=network, labels=net_output)
optim_step = tf.compat.v1.train.GradientDescentOptimizer(learning_rate).minimize(loss, var_list=[img])
epsilon_ph = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, ())
below = net_input - epsilon_ph
above = net_input + epsilon_ph
projected = tf.clip_by_value(tf.clip_by_value(img, below, above), 0, 1)
with tf.control_dependencies([projected]):
project_step = tf.assign(img, projected)
sess.run(assign, feed_dict={net_input: x})
for i in range(steps):
print('Starting...')
# gradient descent step
_, loss_value = sess.run([optim_step], feed_dict={net_input:x,net_output:yg})
# project step
sess.run(project_step, feed_dict={net_input: x, epsilon_ph: epsilon})
if (i+1) % 10 == 0:
print('step %d, loss=%g' % (i+1, loss_value))
adv = img.eval() # retrieve the adversarial example
Here's the error message I get:
ValueError: No gradients provided for any variable, check your graph for ops that do not support gradients, between variables ["<tf.Variable 'img:0' shape=(1, 512, 512, 3) dtype=float32_ref>"] and loss Tensor("softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits/Reshape_2:0", shape=(?, ?, ?), dtype=float32).
I should mention that this is using Tensorflow 1.14 - as the code suite is built around it.
Thanks in advance.
I try to modify the code from the Convolutional Neural Network TensorFlow Tutorial to get the single probabilities for each class from each test-images.
What alternative to tf.nn.in_top_k can I use? Because this method returns only one boolean tensor. But I want to preserve the individual values.
I use Tensorflow 1.4 and Python 3.5, I think lines 62-82 and 121-129 / 142 are probably the lines to be modified. Somebody have a hint for me?
Lines 62-82:
def eval_once(saver, summary_writer, top_k_op, summary_op):
"""Run Eval once.
Args:
saver: Saver.
summary_writer: Summary writer.
top_k_op: Top K op.
summary_op: Summary op.
"""
with tf.Session() as sess:
ckpt = tf.train.get_checkpoint_state(FLAGS.checkpoint_dir)
if ckpt and ckpt.model_checkpoint_path:
# Restores from checkpoint
saver.restore(sess, ckpt.model_checkpoint_path)
# Assuming model_checkpoint_path looks something like:
# /my-favorite-path/cifar10_train/model.ckpt-0,
# extract global_step from it.
global_step = ckpt.model_checkpoint_path.split('/')[-1].split('-')[-1]
else:
print('No checkpoint file found')
return
Lines 121-129 + 142
[....]
images, labels = cifar10.inputs(eval_data=eval_data)
# Build a Graph that computes the logits predictions from the
# inference model.
logits = cifar10.inference(images)
# Calculate predictions.
top_k_op = tf.nn.in_top_k(logits, labels, 1)
[....]
You can compute the class probabilities from the raw logits:
# The vector of probabilities per each example in a batch
prediction = tf.nn.softmax(logits)
As a bonus, here's how to get the exact accuracy:
correct_pred = tf.equal(tf.argmax(logits, 1), tf.argmax(labels, 1))
accuracy = tf.reduce_mean(tf.cast(correct_pred, tf.float32))
I have wrote a program with Tensorflow that identifies a number of figures in an image. The model is trained with a function and then used with another function to label the figures. The training have been done on my computer and the resulting model upload to aws with the solve function.
I my computer it works well, but when create a lambda in aws it works strange and start giving different answers with the same test data.
The model in the solve function is this:
# Recreate neural network from model file generated during training
# input
x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, [None, size_of_image])
# weights
W = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([size_of_image, num_chars]))
# biases
b = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([num_chars]))
The solve function code to label the figures is this:
for testi in range(captcha_letters_num):
# load model from file
saver = tf.train.import_meta_graph(model_path + '.meta',
clear_devices=True)
saver.restore(sess, model_path)
# Data to label
test_x = np.asarray(char_imgs[testi], dtype=np.float32)
predict_op = model(test_x, W, b)
op = sess.run(predict_op, feed_dict={x: test_x})
# find max probability from the probability distribution returned by softmax
max_probability = op[0][0]
max_probability_index = -1
for i in range(num_chars):
if op[0][i] > max_probability:
max_probability = op[0][i]
max_probability_index = i
# append it to final output
final_text += char_map_list[max_probability_index]
# Reset the model so it can be used again
tf.reset_default_graph()
With the same test data it gives different answers, don't know why.
Solved!
What I finally do was to keep the Session outside the loop and initialize the variables. After ending the loop, reset the graph.
saver = tf.train.Saver()
sess = tf.Session()
# Initialize variables
sess.run(tf.global_variables_initializer())
.
.
.
# passing each of the 5 characters through the NNet
for testi in range(captcha_letters_num):
# Data to label
test_x = np.asarray(char_imgs[testi], dtype=np.float32)
predict_op = model(test_x, W, b)
op = sess.run(predict_op, feed_dict={x: test_x})
# find max probability from the probability distribution returned by softmax
max_probability = op[0][0]
max_probability_index = -1
for i in range(num_chars):
if op[0][i] > max_probability:
max_probability = op[0][i]
max_probability_index = i
# append it to final output
final_text += char_map_list[max_probability_index]
# Reset the model so it can be used again
tf.reset_default_graph()
sess.close()
I am trying to use the Transfer Learning approach. Here is a snapshot for the code where my code is learning over the Training data :
max_accuracy = 0.0
saver = tf.train.Saver()
for epoch in range(epocs):
shuffledRange = np.random.permutation(n_train)
y_one_hot_train = encode_one_hot(len(classes), Y_input)
y_one_hot_validation = encode_one_hot(len(classes), Y_validation)
shuffledX = X_input[shuffledRange,:]
shuffledY = y_one_hot_train[shuffledRange]
for Xi, Yi in iterate_mini_batches(shuffledX, shuffledY, mini_batch_size):
sess.run(train_step,
feed_dict={bottleneck_tensor: Xi,
ground_truth_tensor: Yi})
# Every so often, print out how well the graph is training.
is_last_step = (i + 1 == FLAGS.how_many_training_steps)
if (i % FLAGS.eval_step_interval) == 0 or is_last_step:
train_accuracy, cross_entropy_value = sess.run(
[evaluation_step, cross_entropy],
feed_dict={bottleneck_tensor: Xi,
ground_truth_tensor: Yi})
validation_accuracy = sess.run(
evaluation_step,
feed_dict={bottleneck_tensor: X_validation,
ground_truth_tensor: y_one_hot_validation})
print('%s: Step %d: Train accuracy = %.1f%%, Cross entropy = %f, Validation accuracy = %.1f%%' %
(datetime.now(), i, train_accuracy * 100, cross_entropy_value, validation_accuracy * 100))
result_tensor = sess.graph.get_tensor_by_name(ensure_name_has_port(FLAGS.final_tensor_name))
probs = sess.run(result_tensor,feed_dict={'pool_3/_reshape:0': Xi[0].reshape(1,2048)})
if validation_accuracy > max_accuracy :
saver.save(sess, 'models/superheroes_model')
max_accuracy = validation_accuracy
print(probs)
i+=1
Here is where my code, where I am loading the model :
def load_model () :
sess=tf.Session()
#First let's load meta graph and restore weights
saver = tf.train.import_meta_graph('models/superheroes_model.meta')
saver.restore(sess,tf.train.latest_checkpoint('models/'))
sess.run(tf.global_variables_initializer())
result_tensor = sess.graph.get_tensor_by_name(ensure_name_has_port(FLAGS.final_tensor_name))
X_feature = features[0].reshape(1,2048)
probs = sess.run(result_tensor,
feed_dict={'pool_3/_reshape:0': X_feature})
print probs
return sess
So now for the same data point I am getting totally different results while training and testing. Its not even close. During testing, my probabilities are near to 25% as I have 4 classes. But during training highest class probability is 90%.
Is there any issue while saving or restoring the model?
Be careful -- you are calling
sess.run(tf.global_variables_initializer())
after calling
saver.restore(sess,tf.train.latest_checkpoint('models/'))
I've done similar before, and I think that resets all your trained weights/biases/etc. in the restored model.
If you must, call the initializer prior to restoring the model, and if you need to initialize something specific from the restored model, do it individually.
delete sess.run(tf.global_variables_initializer()) in your function load_model, if you do it, all your trained parameters will be replaced with the initial value that will produce 1/4 probability for each class
I have highly unbalanced data in a two class problem that I am trying to use TensorFlow to solve with a NN. I was able to find a posting that exactly described the difficulty that I'm having and gave a solution which appears to address my problem. However I'm working with an assistant, and neither of us really knows python and so TensorFlow is being used like a black box for us. I have extensive (decades) of experience working in a variety of programming languages in various paradigms. That experience allows me to have a pretty good intuitive grasp of what I see happening in the code my assistant cobbled together to get a working model, but neither of us can follow what is going on enough to be able to tell exactly where in TensorFlow we need to make edits to get what we want.
I'm hoping someone with a good knowledge of Python and TensorFlow can look at this and just tell us something like, "Hey, just edit the file called xxx and at the lines at yyy," so we can get on with it.
Below, I have a link to the solution we want to implement, and I've also included the code my assistant wrote that initially got us up and running. Our code produces good results when our data is balanced, but when highly imbalanced, it tends to classify everything skewed to the larger class to get better results.
Here is a link to the solution we found that looks promising:
Loss function for class imbalanced binary classifier in Tensor flow
I've included the relevant code from this link below. Since I know that where we make these edits will depend on how we are using TensorFlow, I've also included our implementation immediately under it in the same code block with appropriate comments to make it clear what we want to add and what we are currently doing:
# Here is the stuff we need to add some place in the TensorFlow source code:
ratio = 31.0 / (500.0 + 31.0)
class_weight = tf.constant([[ratio, 1.0 - ratio]])
logits = ... # shape [batch_size, 2]
weight_per_label = tf.transpose( tf.matmul(labels
, tf.transpose(class_weight)) ) #shape [1, batch_size]
# this is the weight for each datapoint, depending on its label
xent = tf.mul(weight_per_label
, tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits(logits, labels, name="xent_raw") #shape [1, batch_size]
loss = tf.reduce_mean(xent) #shape 1
# NOW HERE IS OUR OWN CODE TO SHOW HOW WE ARE USING TensorFlow:
# (Obviously this is not in the same file in real life ...)
import os
os.environ['TF_CPP_MIN_LOG_LEVEL']='2'
import tensorflow as tf
import numpy as np
from math import exp
from PreProcessData import load_and_process_training_Data,
load_and_process_test_data
from PrintUtilities import printf, printResultCompare
tf.set_random_seed(0)
#==============================================================
# predefine file path
''' Unbalanced Training Data, hence there are 1:11 target and nontarget '''
targetFilePath = '/Volumes/Extend/BCI_TestData/60FeaturesVersion/Train1-35/tar.txt'
nontargetFilePath = '/Volumes/Extend/BCI_TestData/60FeaturesVersion/Train1-35/nontar.txt'
testFilePath = '/Volumes/Extend/BCI_TestData/60FeaturesVersion/Test41/feats41.txt'
labelFilePath = '/Volumes/Extend/BCI_TestData/60FeaturesVersion/Test41/labs41.txt'
# train_x,train_y =
load_and_process_training_Data(targetFilePath,nontargetFilePath)
train_x, train_y =
load_and_process_training_Data(targetFilePath,nontargetFilePath)
# test_x,test_y = load_and_process_test_data(testFilePath,labelFilePath)
test_x, test_y = load_and_process_test_data(testFilePath,labelFilePath)
# trained neural network path
save_path = "nn_saved_model/model.ckpt"
# number of classes
n_classes = 2 # in this case, target or non_target
# number of hidden layers
num_hidden_layers = 1
# number of nodes in each hidden layer
nodes_in_layer1 = 40
nodes_in_layer2 = 100
nodes_in_layer3 = 30 # We think: 3 layers is dangerous!! try to avoid it!!!!
# number of data features in each blocks
block_size = 3000 # computer may not have enough memory, so we divide the train into blocks
# number of times we iterate through training data
total_iterations = 1000
# terminate training if computed loss < supposed loss
expected_loss = 0.1
# max learning rate and min learnign rate
max_learning_rate = 0.002
min_learning_rate = 0.0002
# These are placeholders for some values in graph
# tf.placeholder(dtype, shape=None(optional), name=None(optional))
# It's a tensor to hold our datafeatures
x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, [None,len(train_x[0])])
# Every row has either [1,0] for targ or [0,1] for non_target. placeholder to hold one hot value
Y_C = tf.placeholder(tf.int8, [None, n_classes])
# variable learning rate
lr = tf.placeholder(tf.float32)
# neural network model
def neural_network_model(data):
if (num_hidden_layers == 1):
# layers contain weights and bias for case like all neurons fired a 0 into the layer, we will need result out
# When using RELUs, make sure biases are initialised with small *positive* values for example 0.1 = tf.ones([K])/10
hidden_1_layer = {'weights': tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([len(train_x[0]), nodes_in_layer1])),
'bias': tf.Variable(tf.ones([nodes_in_layer1]) / 10)}
# no more bias when come to the output layer
output_layer = {'weights': tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([nodes_in_layer1, n_classes])),
'bias': tf.Variable(tf.zeros([n_classes]))}
# multiplication of the raw input data multipled by their unique weights (starting as random, but will be optimized)
l1 = tf.add(tf.matmul(data, hidden_1_layer['weights']), hidden_1_layer['bias'])
l1 = tf.nn.relu(l1)
# We repeat this process for each of the hidden layers, all the way down to our output, where we have the final values still being the multiplication of the input and the weights, plus the output layer's bias values.
Ylogits = tf.matmul(l1, output_layer['weights']) + output_layer['bias']
if (num_hidden_layers == 2):
# layers contain weights and bias for case like all neurons fired a 0 into the layer, we will need result out
# When using RELUs, make sure biases are initialised with small *positive* values for example 0.1 = tf.ones([K])/10
hidden_1_layer = {'weights': tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([len(train_x[0]), nodes_in_layer1])),
'bias': tf.Variable(tf.ones([nodes_in_layer1]) / 10)}
hidden_2_layer = {'weights': tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([nodes_in_layer1, nodes_in_layer2])),
'bias': tf.Variable(tf.ones([nodes_in_layer2]) / 10)}
# no more bias when come to the output layer
output_layer = {'weights': tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([nodes_in_layer2, n_classes])),
'bias': tf.Variable(tf.zeros([n_classes]))}
# multiplication of the raw input data multipled by their unique weights (starting as random, but will be optimized)
l1 = tf.add(tf.matmul(data, hidden_1_layer['weights']), hidden_1_layer['bias'])
l1 = tf.nn.relu(l1)
l2 = tf.add(tf.matmul(l1, hidden_2_layer['weights']), hidden_2_layer['bias'])
l2 = tf.nn.relu(l2)
# We repeat this process for each of the hidden layers, all the way down to our output, where we have the final values still being the multiplication of the input and the weights, plus the output layer's bias values.
Ylogits = tf.matmul(l2, output_layer['weights']) + output_layer['bias']
if (num_hidden_layers == 3):
# layers contain weights and bias for case like all neurons fired a 0 into the layer, we will need result out
# When using RELUs, make sure biases are initialised with small *positive* values for example 0.1 = tf.ones([K])/10
hidden_1_layer = {'weights':tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([len(train_x[0]), nodes_in_layer1])), 'bias':tf.Variable(tf.ones([nodes_in_layer1]) / 10)}
hidden_2_layer = {'weights':tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([nodes_in_layer1, nodes_in_layer2])), 'bias':tf.Variable(tf.ones([nodes_in_layer2]) / 10)}
hidden_3_layer = {'weights':tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([nodes_in_layer2, nodes_in_layer3])), 'bias':tf.Variable(tf.ones([nodes_in_layer3]) / 10)}
# no more bias when come to the output layer
output_layer = {'weights':tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([nodes_in_layer3, n_classes])), 'bias':tf.Variable(tf.zeros([n_classes]))}
# multiplication of the raw input data multipled by their unique weights (starting as random, but will be optimized)
l1 = tf.add(tf.matmul(data,hidden_1_layer['weights']), hidden_1_layer['bias'])
l1 = tf.nn.relu(l1)
l2 = tf.add(tf.matmul(l1,hidden_2_layer['weights']), hidden_2_layer['bias'])
l2 = tf.nn.relu(l2)
l3 = tf.add(tf.matmul(l2,hidden_3_layer['weights']), hidden_3_layer['bias'])
l3 = tf.nn.relu(l3)
# We repeat this process for each of the hidden layers, all the way down to our output, where we have the final values still being the multiplication of the input and the weights, plus the output layer's bias values.
Ylogits = tf.matmul(l3,output_layer['weights']) + output_layer['bias']
return Ylogits # return the neural network model
# set up the training process
def train_neural_network(x):
# produce the prediction base on output of nn model
Ylogits = neural_network_model(x)
# measure the error use build in cross entropy function, the value that we want to minimize
cross_entropy = tf.reduce_mean(tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits(logits=Ylogits, labels=Y_C))
# To optimize our cost (cross_entropy), reduce error, default learning_rate is 0.001, but you can change it, this case we use default
# optimizer = tf.train.GradientDescentOptimizer(0.003)
optimizer = tf.train.AdamOptimizer(lr)
train_step = optimizer.minimize(cross_entropy)
# start the session
with tf.Session() as sess:
# We initialize all of our variables first before start
sess.run(tf.global_variables_initializer())
# iterate epoch count time (cycles of feed forward and back prop), each epoch means neural see through all train_data once
for epoch in range(total_iterations):
# count the total cost per epoch, declining mean better result
epoch_loss=0
i=0
decay_speed = 150
# current learning rate
learning_rate = min_learning_rate + (max_learning_rate - min_learning_rate) * exp(-epoch/decay_speed)
# divide the dataset in to data_set/batch_size in case run out of memory
while i < len(train_x):
# load train data
start = i
end = i + block_size
batch_x = np.array(train_x[start:end])
batch_y = np.array(train_y[start:end])
train_data = {x: batch_x, Y_C: batch_y, lr: learning_rate}
# train
# sess.run(train_step,feed_dict=train_data)
# run optimizer and cost against batch of data.
_, c = sess.run([train_step, cross_entropy], feed_dict=train_data)
epoch_loss += c
i+=block_size
# print iteration status
printf("epoch: %5d/%d , loss: %f", epoch, total_iterations, epoch_loss)
# terminate training when loss < expected_loss
if epoch_loss < expected_loss:
break
# how many predictions we made that were perfect matches to their labels
# test model
# test data
test_data = {x:test_x, Y_C:test_y}
# calculate accuracy
correct_prediction = tf.equal(tf.argmax(Ylogits, 1), tf.argmax(Y_C, 1))
accuracy = tf.reduce_mean(tf.cast(correct_prediction, 'float'))
print('Accuracy:',accuracy.eval(test_data))
# result matrix, return the position of 1 in array
result = (sess.run(tf.argmax(Ylogits.eval(feed_dict=test_data),1)))
answer = []
for i in range(len(test_y)):
if test_y[i] == [0,1]:
answer.append(1)
elif test_y[i]==[1,0]:
answer.append(0)
answer = np.array(answer)
printResultCompare(result,answer)
# save the prediction of correctness
np.savetxt('nn_prediction.txt', Ylogits.eval(feed_dict={x: test_x}), delimiter=',',newline="\r\n")
# save the nn model for later use again
# 'Saver' op to save and restore all the variables
saver = tf.train.Saver()
saver.save(sess, save_path)
#print("Model saved in file: %s" % save_path)
# load the trained neural network model
def test_loaded_neural_network(trained_NN_path):
Ylogits = neural_network_model(x)
saver = tf.train.Saver()
with tf.Session() as sess:
# load saved model
saver.restore(sess, trained_NN_path)
print("Loading variables from '%s'." % trained_NN_path)
np.savetxt('nn_prediction.txt', Ylogits.eval(feed_dict={x: test_x}), delimiter=',',newline="\r\n")
# test model
# result matrix
result = (sess.run(tf.argmax(Ylogits.eval(feed_dict={x:test_x}),1)))
# answer matrix
answer = []
for i in range(len(test_y)):
if test_y[i] == [0,1]:
answer.append(1)
elif test_y[i]==[1,0]:
answer.append(0)
answer = np.array(answer)
printResultCompare(result,answer)
# calculate accuracy
correct_prediction = tf.equal(tf.argmax(Ylogits, 1), tf.argmax(Y_C, 1))
print(Ylogits.eval(feed_dict={x: test_x}).shape)
train_neural_network(x)
#test_loaded_neural_network(save_path)
So, can anyone help point us to the right place to make the edits that we need to make to resolve our problem? (i.e. what is the name of the file we need to edit, and where is it located.) Thanks in advance!
-gt-
The answer you want:
You should add these codes in your train_neural_network(x) function.
ratio = (num of classes 1) / ((num of classes 0) + (num of classes 1))
class_weight = tf.constant([[ratio, 1.0 - ratio]])
Ylogits = neural_network_model(x)
weight_per_label = tf.transpose( tf.matmul(Y_C , tf.transpose(class_weight)) )
cross_entropy = tf.reduce_mean( tf.mul(weight_per_label, tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits(logits=Ylogits, labels=Y_C) ) )
optimizer = tf.train.AdamOptimizer(lr)
train_step = optimizer.minimize(cross_entropy)
instead of these lines:
Ylogits = neural_network_model(x)
# measure the error use build in cross entropy function, the value that we want to minimize
cross_entropy = tf.reduce_mean(tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits(logits=Ylogits, labels=Y_C))
# To optimize our cost (cross_entropy), reduce error, default learning_rate is 0.001, but you can change it, this case we use default
# optimizer = tf.train.GradientDescentOptimizer(0.003)
optimizer = tf.train.AdamOptimizer(lr)
train_step = optimizer.minimize(cross_entropy)
More Details:
Since in neural network, we calculate the error of prediction with respect to the targets( the true labels ), in your case, you use the cross entropy error which finds the sum of targets multiple Log of predicted probabilities.
The optimizer of network backpropagates to minimize the error to achieve more accuracy.
Without weighted loss, the weight for each class are equals, so optimizer reduce the error for the classes which have more amount and overlook the other class.
So in order to prevent this phenomenon, we should force the optimizer to backpropogate larger error for class with small amount, to do this we should multiply the errors with a scalar.
I hope it was useful :)