I made an implementation of Longest Increasing Subsequence (LIS) algorithm, as I see it would work, but results are totally mess.
def lis():
#D = map(int, raw_input().split())
D = [3, 2, 6, 4, 5, 1]
L = [[] for i in range(len(D))]
L[0].append(D[0])
for i in range(len(D)):
for j in range(0,i):
if D[i] > D[j]:
L[i] = L[j]
L[i].append(D[i])
print L
Returned result:
[[3], [2, 6, 4, 5], [2, 6, 4, 5], [2, 6, 4, 5], [2, 6, 4, 5], [1]]
What it should be:
[[3], [2], [2, 6], [2, 4], [2, 4, 5], [1]]
As I saw in debugger when we have:
L[i] = L[j]
Not only L[i] gets new values, but other lists on the main (L) list too...
I don't know how to avoid it. It looks that lists in Python are totally different than vectors languages from C family...
I'm fighting with this for a long time. Huge beer to someone who gonna find what is wrong :(
When you state L[i] = L[j] you do not copy the content of the list, you simply copy a reference: from now on L[i] and L[j] point to the same list and changes made through L[i] will reflect when you obtain L[j].
A simply fix is simply to copy the list:
def lis():
#D = map(int, raw_input().split())
D = [3, 2, 6, 4, 5, 1]
L = [[] for i in range(len(D))]
L[0].append(D[0])
for i in range(len(D)):
for j in range(0,i):
if D[i] > D[j]:
L[i] = list(L[j])
L[i].append(D[i])
print(L)
Now hoever your algorithm does not work anymore (it was not working in the first place nevertheless). When running your (fixed) code, you get:
>>> lis()
[[3, 3], [2], [2, 6], [2, 4], [2, 4, 5], [1]]
The 3 occurs twice in the first list, you can solve this by removing the .append before the for loop. So the final version is:
def lis():
#D = map(int, raw_input().split())
D = [3, 2, 6, 4, 5, 1]
L = [[] for i in range(len(D))] #removed the next line
for i in range(len(D)):
for j in range(0,i):
if D[i] > D[j]:
L[i] = list(L[j])
L[i].append(D[i])
print(L)
Which produces:
>>> lis()
[[3], [2], [2, 6], [2, 4], [2, 4, 5], [1]]
Note: based on your comment you use python-2.7, from python-3.x there is a method called .copy() on lists that you can call.
Important Note
The solution which is above is correct but if you try it out the result can be wrong for some instances.
For example - Longest Increasing Subsequence for numbers:
5 1 4 2 3 1 2 9 1
is
1 2 3 9
But this solution won't be on your L list returned by algorithm. There will be:
1 2 9
Max element from L list is needed. Then another element from D can be appended, so we have to add one more condition, here you go the correct code:
def lis():
#D = map(int, raw_input().split())
D = [5, 1, 4, 2, 3, 1, 2, 9, 1]
L = [[] for i in range(len(D))]
for i in range(len(D)):
for j in range(0,i):
if D[i] > D[j] and len(L[i]) < len(L[j])+1: #added condition
L[i] = list(L[j])
L[i].append(D[i])
print(L)
>>lis()
[[5], [1], [1, 4], [1, 2], [1, 2, 3], [1], [1, 2], [1, 2, 3, 9], [1]]
Related
I will start the description of the problem with an example so that the question is clear.
List of numbers: [1,2,3,4]
How can I get each successive string: [[1],[1,2],[1,2,3],[1,2,3,4],[2],[2,3],[2,3,4],[3],[3,4],[4]]
I've been trying to solve this problem for a while and managed to get [[1, 2, 3, 4], [2, 3, 4], [3, 4], [4]] with lots of useless repetitions.
list = [1,2,3,4]
i = 0
j = 0
tempList = []
sequancesList = []
while i < len(list):
while j < len(list):
tempList.append(list[j])
sequancesList.append(tempList)
j += 1
i += 1
j = i
tempList = []
def deleteDuplicates(list):
noduplist = []
for element in list:
if element not in noduplist:
noduplist.append(element)
return noduplist
finalSequancesList = deleteDuplicates(sequancesList)
print(finalSequancesList)
Here's how to do it:
list = [1,2,3,4]
sequancesList = []
for i in range(len(list)):
tmp = []
for j in range(i,len(list)):
tmp.append(list[j])
sequancesList.append(tmp[:])
print(sequancesList)
-> [[1], [1, 2], [1, 2, 3], [1, 2, 3, 4], [2], [2, 3], [2, 3, 4], [3], [3, 4], [4]]
Here is a generator that does exactly that:
def iter_successive(input_list):
for i in range(len(input_list)):
for j in range(i+1,len(input_list)+1):
yield input_list[i:j]
>>> list(iter_successive(input_list))
[[1], [1, 2], [1, 2, 3], [1, 2, 3, 4], [2], [2, 3], [2, 3, 4], [3], [3, 4], [4]]
Comparable one-liner solution:
def iter_successive(input_list):
return (input_list[i:j] for i in range(len(input_list))
for j in range(i+1,len(input_list)+1))
Edit: As was stated in the comments, the approach below works only if the list contains whole, ascending numbers and not in other instances.
There are two ways to do this, either as a nested for-loop or a one-liner using list-comprehension. Both versions below:
Nested for-loop
nrs = list(range(1,5))
result = []
for i in nrs:
for j in range(i, max(nrs)+1):
result.append(list(range(i,j+1)))
print(result)
List-comprehension
result = [list(range(i,j+1)) for i in nrs for j in range(i, max(nrs)+1)]
print(result)
I have a list of lists, but some lists are "sublists" of other lists. What I want to do is remove the sublists from the larger list so that we only have the largest unique sublists.
For example:
>>> some_list = [[1], [1, 2], [1, 2, 3], [1, 4]]
>>> ideal_list = [[1, 2, 3], [1, 4]]
The code that I've written right now is:
new_list = []
for i in range(some_list)):
for j in range(i + 1, len(some_list)):
count = 0
for k in some_list[i]:
if k in some_list[j]:
count += 1
if count == len(some_list[i]):
new_list.append(some_list[j])
The basic algorithm that I had in mind is that we'd check if a list's elements were in the following sublists, and if so then we use the other larger sublist. It doesn't give the desired output (it actually gives [[1, 2], [1, 2, 3], [1, 4], [1, 2, 3]]) and I'm wondering what I could do to achieve what I want.
I don't want to use sets because duplicate elements matter.
Same idea as set, but using Counter instead. It should be a lot more efficient in sublist check part than brute force
from collections import Counter
new_list = []
counters = []
for arr in sorted(some_list, key=len, reverse=True):
arr_counter = Counter(arr)
if any((c & arr_counter) == arr_counter for c in counters):
continue # it is a sublist of something else
new_list.append(arr)
counters.append(arr_counter)
With some inspiration from #mkrieger1's comment, one possible solution would be:
def merge_sublists(some_list):
new_list = []
for i in range(len(some_list)):
true_or_false = []
for j in range(len(some_list)):
if some_list[j] == some_list[i]:
continue
true_or_false.append(all([x in some_list[j] for x in some_list[i]]))
if not any(true_or_false):
new_list.append(some_list[i])
return new_list
As is stated in the comment, a brute-force solution would be to loop through each element and check if it's a sublist of any other sublist. If it's not, then append it to the new list.
Test cases:
>>> merge_sublists([[1], [1, 2], [1, 2, 3], [1, 4]])
[[1, 2, 3], [1, 4]]
>>> merge_sublists([[1, 2, 3], [4, 5], [3, 4]])
[[1, 2, 3], [4, 5], [3, 4]]
Input:
l = [[1], [1, 2], [1, 2, 3], [1, 4]]
One way here:
l1 = l.copy()
for i in l:
for j in l:
if set(i).issubset(set(j)) and i!=j:
l1.remove(i)
break
This prints:
print(l1)
[[1, 2, 3], [1, 4]]
EDIT: (Taking care of duplicates as well)
l1 = [list(tupl) for tupl in {tuple(item) for item in l }]
l2 = l1.copy()
for i in l1:
for j in l1:
if set(i).issubset(set(j)) and i!=j:
l2.remove(i)
break
I am trying to implement the Longest Increasing Subsequence in Python by refering the video here.
I think I have done it correct. A Dry Run of the code also looks fine to me. But the output is incorrect.
d = [3, 2, 6, 4, 5, 1]
l = []
l.append([d[0]])
for i in range(1, len(d)):
l.append([])
for j in range(0, i):
if d[j] < d[i] and len(l[i]) < len(l[j]) + 1:
l[i] = l[j]
l[i].append(d[i])
print(l)
Expected Output: [[3], [2], [2, 6], [2, 4], [2, 4, 5], [1]]
Actual Output: [[3], [2, 6, 4, 5], [2, 6, 4, 5], [2, 6, 4, 5], [2, 6, 4, 5], [1]]
Any Help Would Be Appreciated!
This is just another referencing problem.
for i in range(1, len(d)):
l.append([])
for j in range(0, i):
if d[j] < d[i] and len(l[i]) < len(l[j]) + 1:
l[i] = l[j]
l[i].append(d[i])
Note the line l[i] = l[j], that makes l[i] the same list as l[j], so when you modify l[i] later, l[j] gets modified too. You probably want a copy here:
l[i] = l[j][:]
l[i] = list(l[j])
l[i] = l[j].copy() # Python 3.3 or up
These 3 lines are equivalent so pick one you like.
Given an array of numbers (e.g. [3, 5, 2]), I'm trying to generate a list of possible arrays that result from adding 1 to one entry in the array: [[4, 5, 2], [3, 6, 2], [3, 5, 3]].
I can get it done by the following, but wondering if there's a more pythonic way to get the result?
test = [3, 5, 2]
result = [t.copy() for _ in range(len(test))]
for index, _ in enumerate(result):
result[index][index] += 1
Here's how to do it with a list comprehension:
test = [3, 5, 2]
print [test[:i] + [v + 1] + test[i+1:] for i,v in enumerate(test)]
output
[[4, 5, 2], [3, 6, 2], [3, 5, 3]]
Here is another inline solution with list comprehension:
test = [3, 5, 2]
result = [[v+1 if i==j else v for j, v in enumerate(test)] for i in range(len(test))]
or, as noticed by PM 2Ring, you can exploit the fact that True == 1 and False == 0:
result = [[v + (i==j) for j, v in enumerate(test)] for i in range(len(test))]
I didn't manage to correct a code I thought it would work for sure. Any advice to make the code functional is accepted.
Expected outputs of the following code is a list containing a cyclic permuation of the list
l = [1,2,3,4] (i.e : [[4, 1, 2, 3],[3, 4, 1, 2],[2, 3, 4, 1],[1, 2, 3, 4]])
Although what I get is : [[2, 3, 4, 1]]
The code :
def cycGen(l):
L=[]
while not(l in L) :
L.append(l)
for i in range(len(l)):
if l[i] == len(l) :
l[i]=1
else :
l[i] = 1 + l[i]
return L
print(cycGen([1,2,3,4]))
Another variation of the solution is to consider the following code wich seems unfortunatly not working either :
def cycGen(l):
L=[]
for k in range(len(l)):
L.append(l)
for i in range(len(l)):
if l[i] == len(l) :
l[i]=1
else :
l[i] = 1 + l[i]
return L
Help me with your generous knowlege sharing please.
You can use collections.deque:
from collections import deque
a = [1, 2, 3, 4]
d = deque(a)
for _ in range(len(a)):
d.rotate()
print(list(d))
Which gives you the output:
[4, 1, 2, 3]
[3, 4, 1, 2]
[2, 3, 4, 1]
[1, 2, 3, 4]
As mentioned in Efficient way to shift a list in python
An easy way is just:
In [12]: x = [1,2,3,4]
In [13]: [x[i:]+x[:i] for i in range(len(x))]
Out[13]: [[1, 2, 3, 4], [2, 3, 4, 1], [3, 4, 1, 2], [4, 1, 2, 3]]
In your first code sample, the line L.append(l) appends a "reference" (loosely speaking) to the list l to the end of L, rather than appending a copy as you seem to be expecting. Thus, when l is later modified, the reference to it contained in L is modified as well, and so when l in L is tested, l will equal the reference to itself in L, and so the loop will end. The same basic problem causes your second code sample to return multiples of the same list rather than several different lists.
To store a copy of l at the current point in time in L instead, use L.append(l[:]).
Here is an easy way:
>>> def cycGen(l):
size = len(l)
return [[l[(i+j)%size] for i in range(size)] for j in range(size)]
>>> l = [1,2,3,4]
>>> print cycGen(l)
[[1, 2, 3, 4], [2, 3, 4, 1], [3, 4, 1, 2], [4, 1, 2, 3]]
You could do this using a generator too:
a = [1, 2, 3, 4]
def next_pos(max):
i = 0
while True:
for n in xrange(max):
yield n + i
i += 1
pos = next_pos(len(a))
b = []
for i in xrange(len(a)):
n = []
for j in xrange(len(a)):
m = pos.next()
if m >= len(a):
m -= len(a)
n.append(a[m])
b.append(n)
print b
output:
[[1, 2, 3, 4], [2, 3, 4, 1], [3, 4, 1, 2], [4, 1, 2, 3]]