I am trying to take the html of my website and see if it is the same as what I have on an offline version.
I have been researching this, and all I can find is either parsing or something that deals with only http://
So far I have this:
import urllib
url = "https://www.mywebsite.com/"
onlinepage = urllib.urlopen(url)
print(onlinepage.read())
offlinepage = open("offline.txt", "w+")
print(offlinepage.read())
if onlinepage.read() == offlinepage.read():
print("same") # for debugging
else:
print("different")
This always says that they are the same, even when I put in a different website entirely.
When you first print your online and offline pages with these lines:
print(onlinepage.read())
print(offlinepage.read())
...you have now consumed all of the text in each file object. Subsequent reads on either object will return an empty string. Two empty strings are equal, therefore your if condition will always evaluate to True.
If you were purely working with files, you could seek to the beginning of both files and read again. Since there is no seek method on the file object from urlopen, you'll need to either re-fetch the page with a new urlopen command or, better, save the original text in a variable and use that for your subsequent comparisons:
online = onlinepage.read()
print(online)
offline = offlinepage.read()
print(offline)
...
if online == offline:
...
As others have noted, you can't read the request object twice (and can't read the file twice without seeking); once read, the data you got back is no longer available, so you need to store it.
But they missed another problem: You opened the file with mode w+. w+ allows both reading and writing, but, just like mode w, it truncates the file on open. So your local file is always empty when you read it, which means you're both corrupting the local file and never getting a match (unless the online file is empty too).
You need to use mode r+ or a+ to get a read/write handle that doesn't truncate the existing file (r+ requires that the file already exist, a+ does not, but puts the write position at end of file, and on some systems, all writes are put at the end of the file).
So fixing both bugs, you get:
import urllib
url = "https://www.mywebsite.com/"
# Using with statements properly for safe resource cleanup
with urllib.urlopen(url) as onlinepage:
onlinedata = onlinepage.read()
print(onlinedata)
with open("offline.txt", "r+") as offlinepage: # DOES NOT TRUNCATE EXISTING FILE!
offlinedata = offlinepage.read()
print(offlinedata)
if onlinedata == offlinedata:
print("same") # for debugging
else:
print("different")
# I assume you want to rewrite the local page, or you wouldn't open with +
# so this is what you'd do to ensure you replace the existing data correctly
offlinepage.seek(0) # Ensure you're seeked to beginning of file for write
offlinepage.write(onlinedata)
offlinepage.truncate() # If online data smaller, don't keep offline extra data
You use .read() twice on each file.
>>> f.read()
'This is the entire file.\n'
>>> f.read()
''
"If the end of the file has been reached, f.read() will return an empty string ("")." (7.2.1 Docs).
Therefore, when two results are compared, they are equal because each is an empty string.
Related
I'm trying to create a webscraping script in Python where I follow a bunch of links and insert them into a .txt file. However, I want to do this only if the website already doesn't exist in the file.
I have written this code to insert the given website link into the file, so far (not working):
def writeSite(site):
file = open("websites.txt", 'a+')
# print(site)
if site in file.read():
return
file.write(site + "\n")
file.close()
Thanks in advance.
You were pretty close, but because you open the file to append to it, it starts with the file pointer at the end. You need to seek to the start to read its contents again:
def writeSite(site):
file = open("websites.txt", 'a+')
file.seek(0)
# print(site)
if site in file.read():
return
file.write(site + "\n")
file.close()
However, keep in mind that site in file.read() is very crude.
For example, imagine you already have 'http://somesite.com/page/' in the file but now you want to add 'http://somesite.com/' - the URL as a whole is not in the file, but your test will find it.
If you want to check whole lines (and be sure you deal with the file nicely), this would be better:
def writeSite(site):
site += '\n'
with open("websites.txt", 'a+') as f:
f.seek(0)
if site in f.readlines():
return
f.write(site)
It adds a newline to the name of the site to separate the URLs in the file and uses readlines to make use of that fact to check for the whole URL. Using with ensures the file always gets closed.
And since you want to read before writing anyway, you could use 'r+' as a mode, and skip the seek - but only if you can be sure the file already exists. I assume you chose 'a+' because that isn't the case.
(in case you worry that this changes the value of site - that's only true for the parameter inside the function. Whatever value you passed in outside the function will remain unaffected)
Started Python a week ago and I have some questions to ask about reading and writing to the same files. I've gone through some tutorials online but I am still confused about it. I can understand simple read and write files.
openFile = open("filepath", "r")
readFile = openFile.read()
print readFile
openFile = open("filepath", "a")
appendFile = openFile.write("\nTest 123")
openFile.close()
But, if I try the following I get a bunch of unknown text in the text file I am writing to. Can anyone explain why I am getting such errors and why I cannot use the same openFile object the way shown below.
# I get an error when I use the codes below:
openFile = open("filepath", "r+")
writeFile = openFile.write("Test abc")
readFile = openFile.read()
print readFile
openFile.close()
I will try to clarify my problems. In the example above, openFile is the object used to open file. I have no problems if I want write to it the first time. If I want to use the same openFile to read files or append something to it. It doesn't happen or an error is given. I have to declare the same/different open file object before I can perform another read/write action to the same file.
#I have no problems if I do this:
openFile = open("filepath", "r+")
writeFile = openFile.write("Test abc")
openFile2 = open("filepath", "r+")
readFile = openFile2.read()
print readFile
openFile.close()
I will be grateful if anyone can tell me what I did wrong here or is it just a Pythong thing. I am using Python 2.7. Thanks!
Updated Response:
This seems like a bug specific to Windows - http://bugs.python.org/issue1521491.
Quoting from the workaround explained at http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-bugs-list/2005-August/029886.html
the effect of mixing reads with writes on a file open for update is
entirely undefined unless a file-positioning operation occurs between
them (for example, a seek()). I can't guess what
you expect to happen, but seems most likely that what you
intend could be obtained reliably by inserting
fp.seek(fp.tell())
between read() and your write().
My original response demonstrates how reading/writing on the same file opened for appending works. It is apparently not true if you are using Windows.
Original Response:
In 'r+' mode, using write method will write the string object to the file based on where the pointer is. In your case, it will append the string "Test abc" to the start of the file. See an example below:
>>> f=open("a","r+")
>>> f.read()
'Test abc\nfasdfafasdfa\nsdfgsd\n'
>>> f.write("foooooooooooooo")
>>> f.close()
>>> f=open("a","r+")
>>> f.read()
'Test abc\nfasdfafasdfa\nsdfgsd\nfoooooooooooooo'
The string "foooooooooooooo" got appended at the end of the file since the pointer was already at the end of the file.
Are you on a system that differentiates between binary and text files? You might want to use 'rb+' as a mode in that case.
Append 'b' to the mode to open the file in binary mode, on systems
that differentiate between binary and text files; on systems that
don’t have this distinction, adding the 'b' has no effect.
http://docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html#open
Every open file has an implicit pointer which indicates where data will be read and written. Normally this defaults to the start of the file, but if you use a mode of a (append) then it defaults to the end of the file. It's also worth noting that the w mode will truncate your file (i.e. delete all the contents) even if you add + to the mode.
Whenever you read or write N characters, the read/write pointer will move forward that amount within the file. I find it helps to think of this like an old cassette tape, if you remember those. So, if you executed the following code:
fd = open("testfile.txt", "w+")
fd.write("This is a test file.\n")
fd.close()
fd = open("testfile.txt", "r+")
print fd.read(4)
fd.write(" IS")
fd.close()
... It should end up printing This and then leaving the file content as This IS a test file.. This is because the initial read(4) returns the first 4 characters of the file, because the pointer is at the start of the file. It leaves the pointer at the space character just after This, so the following write(" IS") overwrites the next three characters with a space (the same as is already there) followed by IS, replacing the existing is.
You can use the seek() method of the file to jump to a specific point. After the example above, if you executed the following:
fd = open("testfile.txt", "r+")
fd.seek(10)
fd.write("TEST")
fd.close()
... Then you'll find that the file now contains This IS a TEST file..
All this applies on Unix systems, and you can test those examples to make sure. However, I've had problems mixing read() and write() on Windows systems. For example, when I execute that first example on my Windows machine then it correctly prints This, but when I check the file afterwards the write() has been completely ignored. However, the second example (using seek()) seems to work fine on Windows.
In summary, if you want to read/write from the middle of a file in Windows I'd suggest always using an explicit seek() instead of relying on the position of the read/write pointer. If you're doing only reads or only writes then it's pretty safe.
One final point - if you're specifying paths on Windows as literal strings, remember to escape your backslashes:
fd = open("C:\\Users\\johndoe\\Desktop\\testfile.txt", "r+")
Or you can use raw strings by putting an r at the start:
fd = open(r"C:\Users\johndoe\Desktop\testfile.txt", "r+")
Or the most portable option is to use os.path.join():
fd = open(os.path.join("C:\\", "Users", "johndoe", "Desktop", "testfile.txt"), "r+")
You can find more information about file IO in the official Python docs.
Reading and Writing happens where the current file pointer is and it advances with each read/write.
In your particular case, writing to the openFile, causes the file-pointer to point to the end of file. Trying to read from the end would result EOF.
You need to reset the file pointer, to point to the beginning of the file before through seek(0) before reading from it
You can read, modify and save to the same file in python but you have actually to replace the whole content in file, and to call before updating file content:
# set the pointer to the beginning of the file in order to rewrite the content
edit_file.seek(0)
I needed a function to go through all subdirectories of folder and edit content of the files based on some criteria, if it helps:
new_file_content = ""
for directories, subdirectories, files in os.walk(folder_path):
for file_name in files:
file_path = os.path.join(directories, file_name)
# open file for reading and writing
with io.open(file_path, "r+", encoding="utf-8") as edit_file:
for current_line in edit_file:
if condition in current_line:
# update current line
current_line = current_line.replace('john', 'jack')
new_file_content += current_line
# set the pointer to the beginning of the file in order to rewrite the content
edit_file.seek(0)
# delete actual file content
edit_file.truncate()
# rewrite updated file content
edit_file.write(new_file_content)
# empties new content in order to set for next iteration
new_file_content = ""
edit_file.close()
I am attempting to output a new txt file but it come up blank. I am doing this
my_file = open("something.txt","w")
#and then
my_file.write("hello")
Right after this line it just says 5 and then no text comes up in the file
What am I doing wrong?
You must close the file before the write is flushed. If I open an interpreter and then enter:
my_file = open('something.txt', 'w')
my_file.write('hello')
and then open the file in a text program, there is no text.
If I then issue:
my_file.close()
Voila! Text!
If you just want to flush once and keep writing, you can do that too:
my_file.flush()
my_file.write('\nhello again') # file still says 'hello'
my_file.flush() # now it says 'hello again' on the next line
By the way, if you happen to read the beautiful, wonderful documentation for file.write, which is only 2 lines long, you would have your answer (emphasis mine):
Write a string to the file. There is no return value. Due to buffering, the string may not actually show up in the file until the flush() or close() method is called.
If you don't want to care about closing file, use with:
with open("something.txt","w") as f:
f.write('hello')
Then python will take care of closing the file for you automatically.
As Two-Bit Alchemist pointed out, the file has to be closed. The python file writer uses a buffer (BufferedIOBase I think), meaning it collects a certain number of bytes before writing them to disk in bulk. This is done to save overhead when a lot of write operations are performed on a single file.
Also: When working with files, try using a with-environment to make sure your file is closed after you are done writing/reading:
with open("somefile.txt", "w") as myfile:
myfile.write("42")
# when you reach this point, i.e. leave the with-environment,
# the file is closed automatically.
The python file writer uses a buffer (BufferedIOBase I think), meaning
it collects a certain number of bytes before writing them to disk in
bulk. This is done to save overhead when a lot of write operations are
performed on a single file. Ref #m00am
Your code is also okk. Just add a statement for close file, then work correctly.
my_file = open("fin.txt","w")
#and then
my_file.write("hello")
my_file.close()
in a py module, I write:
outFile = open(fileName, mode='w')
if A:
outFile.write(...)
if B:
outFile.write(...)
and in these lines, I didn't use flush or close method.
Then after these lines, I want to check whether this "outFile" object is empty or not. How can I do with it?
There are a few problems with your code.
You can't .write to a file that you opened with 'r'. You need to open(fileName, 'w').
If A or B then you've certainly written to the file, so it's not empty!
Barring those. you can get the length of a file with
os.stat(outFile.fileno())
EDIT: I'll explain what flush does. Python is often used to do quite large amounts of file reads and writes, which can be slow. It is thus tweaked to make them as fast as possible. One way that is does so is to "buffer" such writes and then do them all in one big block: when you write a small string, Python will remember it but won't actually write it to the file until it thinks it should.
This means that if you want to tell whether you have written data to the file by inspecting the file, you have to tell Python to write all the data it's remembering first, or else you might not see it. flush is the command to write all the buffered data.
Of course, if you ask Python whether it's written anything to the file, say by inspecting the position in the file (.tell()), then it will know about the buffering.
If you've already written to the file, you can use .tell() to check if the current file position is nonzero:
>>> handle = open('/tmp/file.txt', 'w')
>>> handle.write('foo')
>>> handle.tell()
3
This won't work if you .seek() back to the beginning of the file.
You can use os.stat to get file info:
import os
fileSize = os.stat(fileName).st_size
with open("filename.txt", "r+") as f:
if f.read():
# file isn't empty
f.write("something")
# uncomment this line if you want to delete everything else in the file
# f.truncate()
else:
# file is empty
f.write("somethingelse")
"r+" mode always you to read & write.
"with" will automatically close file
I'm doing all this in the interpreter..
loc1 = '/council/council1'
file1 = open(loc1, 'r')
at this point i can do file1.read() and it prints the file's contents as a string to standard output
but if i add this..
string1 = file1.read()
string 1 comes back empty.. i have no idea what i could be doing wrong. this seems like the most basic thing!
if I go on to type file1.read() again, the output to standard output is just an empty string. so, somehow i am losing my file when i try to create a string with file1.read()
You can only read a file once. After that, the current read-position is at the end of the file.
If you add file1.seek(0) before you re-read it, you should be able to read the contents again. A better approach, however, is to read into a string the first time and then keep it in memory:
loc1 = '/council/council1'
file1 = open(loc1, 'r')
string1 = file1.read()
print string1
You do not lose it, you just move offset pointer to the end of file and try to read some more data. Since it is the end of the file, no more data is available and you get empty string. Try reopening file or seeking to zero position:
f.read()
f.seek(0)
f.read()
Using with is the best syntax to use because it closes the connection to the file after using it(since python 2.5):
with open('/council/council1', 'r') as input_file:
text = input_file.read()
print(text)
To quote the official documentation on read():
To read a file’s contents, call f.read(size)
When size is omitted or negative, the entire contents of the file will
be read and returned;
And the most relevant part:
If the end of the file has been reached, f.read() will return an empty
string ('').
Which means that if you use read() twice consecutively, it is expected that the second time you'll get an empty string. Either store it the first time or use f.seek(0) to go back to the start. Together, they provide a lower level API to give you greater control.
Besides using a context manager to automatically open and close the file, there's another way to read a whole text file, using pathlib, example below:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
from pathlib import Path
txt_file = Path("myfile.txt")
try:
content = txt_file.read_text()
except FileNotFoundError:
print("Could not find file")
else:
print(f"The content is: {content}")
print(f"I can also read again: {txt_file.read_text()}")
As you can see, you can call read_text() several times and you'll get the full content, no surprises. Of course you wouldn't want to do that in production code since read_text() opens and closes the file each time, it's still best to store it. I could recommend pathlib highly when dealing with files and file paths.
It's outside the scope, but it may be worth noting a difference when reading line by line. Unlike the file object obtained by open(), PosixPath returned by Path() is not iterable. The equivalent of:
with open('file.txt') as f:
for line in f:
print(line)
Would be something like:
for line in Path('file.txt').read_text().split('\n'):
print(line)
One advantage of the first approach, with open, is that the entire file is not read into memory at once.
make sure your location is correct. Do you actually have a directory called /council under your root directory (/) ?. also use, os.path.join() to create your path
loc1 = os.path.join("/path","dir1","dir2")