I want to insert the value in the NumPy array as follows,
If Nth row is the same as (N-1)th row insert 1 for Nth row and (N-1)th row and rest 0
If Nth row is different from (N_1)th row then change column and repeat condition
Here is the example
d = {'col1': [2,2, 3,3,3, 4,4, 5,5,5,],
'col2': [3,3, 4,4,4, 1,1, 0,0,0]}
df = pd.DataFrame(data=d)
np.zeros((10,4))
###########################################################
OUTPUT MATRIX
1 0 0 0 First two rows are the same so 1,1 in a first column
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 Three-rows are same 1,1,1
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 1 0 Again two rows are the same 1,1
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 1 Again three rows are same 1,1,1
0 0 0 1
0 0 0 1
IIUC, you can achieve this simply with numpy indexing:
# group by successive identical values
group = df.ne(df.shift()).all(1).cumsum().sub(1)
# craft the numpy array
a = np.zeros((len(group), group.max()+1), dtype=int)
a[np.arange(len(df)), group] = 1
print(a)
Alternative with numpy.identity:
# group by successive identical values
group = df.ne(df.shift()).all(1).cumsum().sub(1)
shape = df.groupby(group).size()
# craft the numpy array
a = np.repeat(np.identity(len(shape), dtype=int), shape, axis=0)
print(a)
output:
array([[1, 0, 0, 0],
[1, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 1, 0, 0],
[0, 1, 0, 0],
[0, 1, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 1, 0],
[0, 0, 1, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 1],
[0, 0, 0, 1],
[0, 0, 0, 1]])
intermediates:
group
0 0
1 0
2 1
3 1
4 1
5 2
6 2
7 3
8 3
9 3
dtype: int64
shape
0 2
1 3
2 2
3 3
dtype: int64
other option
for fun, likely no so efficient on large inputs:
a = pd.get_dummies(df.agg(tuple, axis=1)).to_numpy()
Note that this second option uses groups of identical values, not successive identical values. For identical values with the first (numpy) approach, you would need to use group = df.groupby(list(df)).ngroup() and the numpy indexing option (this wouldn't work with repeating the identity).
I have two numpy arrays of equal size. They contain the values 1, 0, and -1. I can count the number of matching ones and negative ones, but I'm not sure how to count the matching elements that have the same index and value of zero.
I'm a little confused on how to proceed here.
Here is some code:
print(actual_direction.shape)
print(predicted_direction.shape)
act = actual_direction
pre = predicted_direction
part1 = act[pre == 1]
part2 = part1[part1 == 1]
result1 = part2.sum()
part3 = act[pre == -1]
part4 = part3[part3 == -1]
result2 = part4.sum() * -1
non_zeros = result1 + result2
zeros = len(act) - non_zeros
print(f'zeros : {zeros}\n')
print(f'non_zeros : {non_zeros}\n')
final_result = non_zeros + zeros
print(f'result1 : {result1}\n')
print(f'result2 : {result2}\n')
print(f'final_result : {final_result}\n')
Here is the printout:
(11279,)
(11279,)
zeros : 5745.0
non_zeros : 5534.0
result1 : 2217.0
result2 : 3317.0
final_result : 11279.0
So what I've done here is simply subtract the summation of the ones and negative ones from the total length of the array. I can't assume that the difference (zeros: 5745) contains ALL matching elements that contain zeros can I?
You could try this:
import numpy as np
a=np.array([1,0,0,1,-1,-1,0,0])
b=np.array([1,0,0,1,-1,-1,0,1])
summ = np.sum((a==0) & (b==0))
print(summ)
Output:
3
You can use numpy.ravel() to flatten out the array, then use zip() to compare each element side by side:
import numpy as np
ar1 = np.array([[1, 0, 0],
[0, 1, 1],
[0, 1, 0]])
ar2 = np.array([[0, 0, 0],
[1, 0, 1],
[0, 1, 0]])
count = 0
for e1, e2 in zip(ar1.ravel(), ar2.ravel()):
if e1 == e2:
count += 1
print(count)
Output:
6
You can also do this to list all the matches found, as well as print out the amount:
dup = [e1 for e1, e2 in zip(ar1.ravel(), ar2.ravel()) if e1 == e2]
print(dup)
print(len(dup))
Output:
[0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0]
6
You have two arrays and want to count the positions where both of these are 0, right?
You can check where the array meets your required condition (a == 0), and then use the 'and' operator & to check where both arrays meet your requirement:
import numpy as np
a = np.array([1, 0, -1, 0, -1, 1, 1, 1, 1])
b = np.array([1, 0, -1, 1, 0, -1, 1, 0, 1])
both_zero = (a == 0) & (b == 0) # [False, True, False, False, False, False]
both_zero.sum() # 1
In your updated question you appear to be interested in the similarities and differences between actual values and predictions. For this, a confusion matrix is ideally suited.
from sklearn.metrics import confusion_matrix
confusion_matrix(a, b, labels=[-1, 0, 1])
will give you a confusion matrix as output telling you how many -1s were predicted as -1, 0 and 1, and the same for 0 and +1:
[[1 1 0] # -1s predicted as -1, 0 and 1
[0 1 1] # 0s predicted as -1, 0 and 1
[1 1 3]] # 1s predicted as -1, 0 and 1
I have this code:
gs = open("graph.txt", "r")
gp = gs.readline()
gp_splitIndex = gp.find(" ")
gp_nodeCount = int(gp[0:gp_splitIndex])
gp_edgeCount = int(gp[gp_splitIndex+1:-1])
matrix = [] # predecare the array
for i in range(0, gp_nodeCount):
matrix.append([])
for y in range(0, gp_nodeCount):
matrix[i].append(0)
for i in range(0, gp_edgeCount-1):
gp = gs.readline()
gp_splitIndex = gp.find(" ") # get the index of space, dividing the 2 numbers on a row
gp_from = int(gp[0:gp_splitIndex])
gp_to = int(gp[gp_splitIndex+1:-1])
matrix[gp_from][gp_to] = 1
print matrix
The file graph.txt contains this:
5 10
0 1
1 2
2 3
3 4
4 0
0 3
3 1
1 4
4 2
2 0
The first two number are telling me, that GRAPH has 5 nodes and 10 edges. The Following number pairs demonstrate the edges between nodes. For example "1 4" means an edge between node 1 and 4.
Problem is, the output should be this:
[[0, 1, 0, 1, 0], [0, 0, 1, 0, 1], [1, 0, 0, 1, 0], [0, 1, 0, 0, 1], [1, 0, 1, 0, 0]]
But instead of that, I get this:
[[0, 1, 0, 1, 0], [0, 0, 1, 0, 1], [0, 0, 0, 1, 0], [0, 1, 0, 0, 1], [1, 0, 1, 0, 0]]
Only one number is different and I can't understand why is this happening. The edge "3 1" is not present. Can someone explain, where is the problem?
Change for i in range(0, gp_edgeCount-1): to
for i in range(0, gp_edgeCount):
The range() function already does the "-1" operation. range(0,3) "==" [0,1,2]
And it is not the "3 1" edge that is missing, it is the "2 0" edge that is missing, and that is the last edge. The matrices start counting at 0.
Matthias has it; you don't need edgeCount - 1 since the range function doesn't include the end value in the iteration.
There are several other things you can do to clean up your code:
The with operator is preferred for opening files, since it closes them automatically for you
You don't need to call find and manually slice, split already does what you want.
You can convert and assign directly to a pair of numbers using a generator expression and iterable unpacking
You can call range with just an end value, the 0 start is implicit.
The multiplication operator is handy for initializing lists
With all of those changes:
with open('graph.txt', 'r') as graph:
node_count, edge_count = (int(n) for n in graph.readline().split())
matrix = [[0]*node_count for _ in range(node_count)]
for i in range(edge_count):
src, dst = (int(n) for n in graph.readline().split())
matrix[src][dst] = 1
print matrix
# [[0, 1, 0, 1, 0], [0, 0, 1, 0, 1], [1, 0, 0, 1, 0], [0, 1, 0, 0, 1], [1, 0, 1, 0, 0]]
Just to keep your code and style, of course it could be much more readable:
gs = open("graph.txt", "r")
gp = gs.readline()
gp_splitIndex = gp.split(" ")
gp_nodeCount = int(gp_splitIndex[0])
gp_edgeCount = int(gp_splitIndex[1])
matrix = [] # predecare the array
for i in range(0, gp_nodeCount):
matrix.append([])
for y in range(0, gp_nodeCount):
matrix[i].append(0)
for i in range(0, gp_edgeCount):
gp = gs.readline()
gp_Index = gp.split(" ") # get the index of space, dividing the 2 numbers on a row
gp_from = int(gp_Index[0])
gp_to = int(gp_Index[1])
matrix[gp_from][gp_to] = 1
print matrix
Exactly is the last instance not used..the 2 0 from your file. Thus the missed 1. Have a nice day!
The other answers are correct, another version similar to the one of tzaman:
with open('graph.txt', mode='r') as txt_file:
lines = [l.strip() for l in txt_file.readlines()]
number_pairs = [[int(n) for n in line.split(' ')] for line in lines]
header = number_pairs[0]
edge_pairs = number_pairs[1:]
num_nodes, num_edges = header
edges = [[0] * num_nodes for _ in xrange(num_nodes)]
for edge_start, edge_end in edge_pairs:
edges[edge_start][edge_end] = 1
print edges
I'm using numpy to initialize a pixel array to a gray checkerboard (the classic representation for "no pixels", or transparent). It seems like there ought to be a whizzy way to do it with numpy's amazing array assignment/slicing/dicing operations, but this is the best I've come up with:
w, h = 600, 800
sq = 15 # width of each checker-square
self.pix = numpy.zeros((w, h, 3), dtype=numpy.uint8)
# Make a checkerboard
row = [[(0x99,0x99,0x99),(0xAA,0xAA,0xAA)][(i//sq)%2] for i in range(w)]
self.pix[[i for i in range(h) if (i//sq)%2 == 0]] = row
row = [[(0xAA,0xAA,0xAA),(0x99,0x99,0x99)][(i//sq)%2] for i in range(w)]
self.pix[[i for i in range(h) if (i//sq)%2 == 1]] = row
It works, but I was hoping for something simpler.
def checkerboard(shape):
return np.indices(shape).sum(axis=0) % 2
Most compact, probably the fastest, and also the only solution posted that generalizes to n-dimensions.
I'd use the Kronecker product kron:
np.kron([[1, 0] * 4, [0, 1] * 4] * 4, np.ones((10, 10)))
The checkerboard in this example has 2*4=8 fields of size 10x10 in each direction.
this ought to do it
any size checkerboard you want (just pass in width and height, as w, h); also i have hard-coded cell height/width to 1, though of course this could also be parameterized so that an arbitrary value is passed in:
>>> import numpy as NP
>>> def build_checkerboard(w, h) :
re = NP.r_[ w*[0,1] ] # even-numbered rows
ro = NP.r_[ w*[1,0] ] # odd-numbered rows
return NP.row_stack(h*(re, ro))
>>> checkerboard = build_checkerboard(5, 5)
>>> checkerboard
Out[3]: array([[0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1],
[1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0],
[0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1],
[1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0],
[0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1],
[1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0],
[0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1],
[1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0],
[0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1],
[1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0]])
with this 2D array, it's simple to render an image of a checkerboard, like so:
>>> import matplotlib.pyplot as PLT
>>> fig, ax = PLT.subplots()
>>> ax.imshow(checkerboard, cmap=PLT.cm.gray, interpolation='nearest')
>>> PLT.show()
Here's another way to do it using ogrid which is a bit faster:
import numpy as np
import Image
w, h = 600, 800
sq = 15
color1 = (0xFF, 0x80, 0x00)
color2 = (0x80, 0xFF, 0x00)
def use_ogrid():
coords = np.ogrid[0:w, 0:h]
idx = (coords[0] // sq + coords[1] // sq) % 2
vals = np.array([color1, color2], dtype=np.uint8)
img = vals[idx]
return img
def use_fromfunction():
img = np.zeros((w, h, 3), dtype=np.uint8)
c = np.fromfunction(lambda x, y: ((x // sq) + (y // sq)) % 2, (w, h))
img[c == 0] = color1
img[c == 1] = color2
return img
if __name__ == '__main__':
for f in (use_ogrid, use_fromfunction):
img = f()
pilImage = Image.fromarray(img, 'RGB')
pilImage.save('{0}.png'.format(f.func_name))
Here are the timeit results:
% python -mtimeit -s"import test" "test.use_fromfunction()"
10 loops, best of 3: 307 msec per loop
% python -mtimeit -s"import test" "test.use_ogrid()"
10 loops, best of 3: 129 msec per loop
You can use Numpy's tile function to get checkerboard array of size n*m where n and m should be even numbers for the right result...
def CreateCheckboard(n,m):
list_0_1 = np.array([ [ 0, 1], [ 1, 0] ])
checkerboard = np.tile(list_0_1, ( n//2, m//2))
print(checkerboard.shape)
return checkerboard
CreateCheckboard(4,6)
which gives the output:
(4, 6)
array([[0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1],
[1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0],
[0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1],
[1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0]])
You can use the step of start:stop:step for slicing method to update a matrix horizontally and vertically:
Here x[1::2, ::2] picks every other element starting from the first element on the row and for every second row of the matrix.
import numpy as np
print("Checkerboard pattern:")
x = np.zeros((8,8),dtype=int)
# (odd_rows, even_columns)
x[1::2,::2] = 1
# (even_rows, odd_columns)
x[::2,1::2] = 1
print(x)
Late, but for posterity:
def check(w, h, c0, c1, blocksize):
tile = np.array([[c0,c1],[c1,c0]]).repeat(blocksize, axis=0).repeat(blocksize, axis=1)
grid = np.tile(tile, ( h/(2*blocksize)+1, w/(2*blocksize)+1, 1))
return grid[:h,:w]
I'm not sure if this is better than what I had:
c = numpy.fromfunction(lambda x,y: ((x//sq) + (y//sq)) % 2, (w,h))
self.chex = numpy.array((w,h,3))
self.chex[c == 0] = (0xAA, 0xAA, 0xAA)
self.chex[c == 1] = (0x99, 0x99, 0x99)
A perfplot analysis shows that the best (fastest, most readable, memory-efficient) solution is via slicing,
def slicing(n):
A = np.zeros((n, n), dtype=int)
A[1::2, ::2] = 1
A[::2, 1::2] = 1
return A
The stacking solution is a bit faster large matrices, but arguably less well readable. The top-voted answer is also the slowest.
Code to reproduce the plot:
import numpy as np
import perfplot
def indices(n):
return np.indices((n, n)).sum(axis=0) % 2
def slicing(n):
A = np.zeros((n, n), dtype=int)
A[1::2, ::2] = 1
A[::2, 1::2] = 1
return A
def tile(n):
return np.tile([[0, 1], [1, 0]], (n // 2, n // 2))
def stacking(n):
row0 = np.array(n // 2 * [0, 1] + (n % 2) * [0])
row1 = row0 ^ 1
return np.array(n // 2 * [row0, row1] + (n % 2) * [row0])
def ogrid(n):
coords = np.ogrid[0:n, 0:n]
return (coords[0] + coords[1]) % 2
b = perfplot.bench(
setup=lambda n: n,
kernels=[slicing, indices, tile, stacking, ogrid],
n_range=[2 ** k for k in range(14)],
xlabel="n",
)
b.save("out.png")
b.show()
Can't you use hstack and vstack? See here.
Like this:
>>> import numpy as np
>>> b = np.array([0]*4)
>>> b.shape = (2,2)
>>> w = b + 0xAA
>>> r1 = np.hstack((b,w,b,w,b,w,b))
>>> r2 = np.hstack((w,b,w,b,w,b,w))
>>> board = np.vstack((r1,r2,r1,r2,r1,r2,r1))
import numpy as np
a=np.array(([1,0]*4+[0,1]*4)*4).reshape((8,8))
print(a)
[[1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0]
[0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1]
[1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0]
[0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1]
[1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0]
[0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1]
[1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0]
[0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1]]
For those wanting arbitrarily sized squares/rectangles:
import numpy as np
# if you want X squares per axis, do squaresize=[i//X for i in boardsize]
def checkerboard(boardsize, squaresize):
return np.fromfunction(lambda i, j: (i//squaresize[0])%2 != (j//squaresize[1])%2, boardsize).astype(int)
print(checkerboard((10,15), (2,3)))
[[0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0]
[1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1]
[1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1]
[0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0]
[1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1]
[1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1]
[0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0]]
Replace n with an even number and you will get the answer.
import numpy as np
b = np.array([[0,1],[1,0]])
np.tile(b,(n, n))
Based on Eelco Hoogendoorn's answer, if you want a checkerboard with various tile sizes you can use this:
def checkerboard(shape, tile_size):
return (np.indices(shape) // tile_size).sum(axis=0) % 2
I modified hass's answer as follows.
import math
import numpy as np
def checkerboard(w, h, c0, c1, blocksize):
tile = np.array([[c0,c1],[c1,c0]]).repeat(blocksize, axis=0).repeat(blocksize, axis=1)
grid = np.tile(tile,(int(math.ceil((h+0.0)/(2*blocksize))),int(math.ceil((w+0.0)/(2*blocksize)))))
return grid[:h,:w]
Using tile function :
import numpy as np
n = int(input())
x = np.tile(arr,(n,n//2))
x[1::2, 0::2] = 1
x[0::2, 1::2] = 1
print(x)
Very very late, but I needed a solution that allows for a non-unit checker size on an arbitrarily sized checkerboard. Here's a simple and fast solution:
import numpy as np
def checkerboard(shape, dw):
"""Create checkerboard pattern, each square having width ``dw``.
Returns a numpy boolean array.
"""
# Create individual block
block = np.zeros((dw * 2, dw * 2), dtype=bool)
block[dw:, :dw] = 1
block[:dw, dw:] = 1
# Tile until we exceed the size of the mask, then trim
repeat = (np.array(shape) + dw * 2) // np.array(block.shape)
trim = tuple(slice(None, s) for s in shape)
checkers = np.tile(block, repeat)[trim]
assert checkers.shape == shape
return checkers
To convert the checkerboard squares to colors, you could do:
checkers = checkerboard(shape, dw)
img = np.empty_like(checkers, dtype=np.uint8)
img[checkers] = 0xAA
img[~checkers] = 0x99
import numpy as np
n = int(input())
arr = ([0, 1], [1,0])
print(np.tile(arr, (n//2,n//2)))
For input 6, output:
[[0 1 0 1 0 1]
[1 0 1 0 1 0]
[0 1 0 1 0 1]
[1 0 1 0 1 0]
[0 1 0 1 0 1]
[1 0 1 0 1 0]]
I recently want the same function and i modified doug's answer a little bit as follows:
def gen_checkerboard(grid_num, grid_size):
row_even = grid_num/2 * [0,1]
row_odd = grid_num/2 * [1,0]
checkerboard = numpy.row_stack(grid_num/2*(row_even, row_odd))
return checkerboard.repeat(grid_size, axis = 0).repeat(grid_size, axis = 1)
Simplest implementation of the same.
import numpy as np
n = int(input())
checkerboard = np.tile(np.array([[0,1],[1,0]]), (n//2, n//2))
print(checkerboard)
n = int(input())
import numpy as np
m=int(n/2)
a=np.array(([0,1]*m+[1,0]*m)*m).reshape((n,n))
print (a)
So if input is n = 4 then output would be like:
[[0 1 0 1]
[1 0 1 0]
[0 1 0 1]
[1 0 1 0]]
Simplest way to write checkboard matrix using tile()
array = np.tile([0,1],n//2)
array1 = np.tile([1,0],n//2)
finalArray = np.array([array, array1], np.int32)
finalArray = np.tile(finalArray,(n//2,1))
Suppose we need a patter with length and breadth (even number) as l, b.
base_matrix = np.array([[0,1],[1,0]])
As this base matrix, which would be used as a tile already has length and breadth of 2 X 2, we would need to divide by 2.
print np.tile(base_matrix, (l / 2, b / 2))
print (np.tile(base,(4/2,6/2)))
[[0 1 0 1 0 1]
[1 0 1 0 1 0]
[0 1 0 1 0 1]
[1 0 1 0 1 0]]
n = int(input())
import numpy as np
a = np.array([0])
x = np.tile(a,(n,n))
x[1::2, ::2] = 1
x[::2, 1::2] = 1
print(x)
I guess this works perfectly well using numpy.tile( ) function.
Here is the solution using tile function in numpy.
import numpy as np
x = np.array([[0, 1], [1, 0]])
check = np.tile(x, (n//2, n//2))
# Print the created matrix
print(check)
for input 2, the Output is
[[0 1]
[1 0]]
for input 4, the Output is
[[0 1 0 1]
[1 0 1 0]
[0 1 0 1]
[1 0 1 0]]
Given odd or even 'n', below approach generates "arr" in the checkerboard pattern and does not use loops. If n is odd, this is extremely straightforward to use. If n is even, we generate the checkerboard for n-1 and then add an extra row and column.
rows = n-1 if n%2 == 0 else n
arr=(rows*rows)//2*[0,1]
arr.extend([0])
arr = np.reshape(arr, (rows,rows))
if n%2 == 0:
extra = (n//2*[1,0])
arr = np.concatenate((arr, np.reshape(extra[:-1], (1,n-1))))
arr = np.concatenate((arr, np.reshape(extra, (n,1))), 1)
Here is a generalisation to falko's answer
import numpy as np
def checkerboard(width,sq):
'''
width --> the checkerboard will be of size width x width
sq ---> each square inside the checkerboard will be of size sq x sq
'''
rep = int(width/(2*sq))
return np.kron([[1, 0] * rep, [0, 1] * rep] * rep, np.ones((sq, sq))).astype(np.uint8)
x = checkerboard(width=8,sq=4)
print(x)
print('checkerboard is of size ',x.shape)
which gives the following output
[[1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0]
[1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0]
[1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0]
[1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1]
[0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1]
[0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1]
[0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1]]
checkerboard is of size (8, 8)
Here's a numpy solution with some checking to make sure that the width and height are evenly divisible by the square size.
def make_checkerboard(w, h, sq, fore_color, back_color):
"""
Creates a checkerboard pattern image
:param w: The width of the image desired
:param h: The height of the image desired
:param sq: The size of the square for the checker pattern
:param fore_color: The foreground color
:param back_color: The background color
:return:
"""
w_rem = np.mod(w, sq)
h_rem = np.mod(w, sq)
if w_rem != 0 or h_rem != 0:
raise ValueError('Width or height is not evenly divisible by square '
'size.')
img = np.zeros((h, w, 3), dtype='uint8')
x_divs = w // sq
y_divs = h // sq
fore_tile = np.ones((sq, sq, 3), dtype='uint8')
fore_tile *= np.array([[fore_color]], dtype='uint8')
back_tile = np.ones((sq, sq, 3), dtype='uint8')
back_tile *= np.array([[back_color]], dtype='uint8')
for y in np.arange(y_divs):
if np.mod(y, 2):
b = back_tile
f = fore_tile
else:
b = fore_tile
f = back_tile
for x in np.arange(x_divs):
if np.mod(x, 2) == 0:
img[y * sq:y * sq + sq, x * sq:x * sq + sq] = f
else:
img[y * sq:y * sq + sq, x * sq:x * sq + sq] = b
return img