I am working on a project (the tech is Django Framework), and I have been assigned a task to create a functionality to store translations and create new translations of a given json file. The json file includes key, value pairs where the key is a unique key that the front-end of the app uses to tell where the text goes, which is the value. For example, { 'restaurant.wait':'Please wait while we process your order'}. So, I have a default json file with keys and values in English, and say we need a translation, I need to be able to get the values (easy part), show them to the translator, then he will input translations in a form with the translation for the given text. Now here comes the hard part, I need to then take this translation and map it back to the same keys in the json file. Another feature that this needs to have is to be able to export/import csv files of translations and then dynamically add them. I can't seem to figure out how to start solving this problem. I tried thinking of a model that I could have to hold the keys and to have another model that would be the translations, but I get confused how I should input the default values. I've just come to a stalemate on this problem and I am having a hard time thinking up of a clean way to do this. I also tried to go about it without a model for a database and just use a view to do this, but there is a problem with keeping order of the keys, and mapping the translations back to the correct keys. Please, I would really appreciate any help I can get with how I should go about to implement this. Thank you, in advance I hope there is enough detail that you can understand the issue I am having.
Related
I'm trying to create a model in SQLAlchemy, but I'm having a hard time finding out what is the best way. I currently have a class called returns, which I want to give an additional variable. A state of which the return is in. So for example, a return can be expected, received or processed. However, in the Flask application I want to show the user a nice string. For example; processed should become "Waiting for reimboursment".
The problem however is, I don't want to send these strings to the database, since I might change them in the future or add statusses. Therefore I want some kind of translation to be made between the value saved in the DB and the 'string' value. I have tried solving this by using Enums, but it is not possible to create the 'string' values. I would like something like this to return either the 'key' or the 'value', where only the key is saved in the database.
return.status.key
return.status.value
I have tried looking for a solution but was not able to find anything that seems to be fit.
What is the best practice for these kinds of requirements?
I am somewhat of a beginner at Python and I am currently starting some brainstorming and planning for a project to simplify the tedious task of filling out a product order form for a friend's business. I am wanting to create a program with an interface that takes in input and writes to an already existing pdf form of the physical order form. I would also like to implement being able to then email that form to another coworker and having accessible information of previous orders from the current customer ordering.
I am most curious about how to write to an already existing pdf form and just fill in the blanks, potentially using a PDF Reader? Also, for product catalog data and customer order history, would using dictionaries suffice or would it be better to use some python database?
I know I could figure out how to individually do each of those tasks but I don't know how to tie it all together properly to distribute it, either making a WebApp or an executable file from the script and just use tkinter or another GUI library for the interface, or if there is a more obvious and convenient option?
If I were to do a WebApp, what would be my best option, I've seen options such as Anvil, Flask, Django, and I just don't know what would be best for what I'm trying to accomplish.
I know this is a longshot and vague but any advice or guidance in the right direction would be much appreciated!
I'd go with a web app here. Personally, I prefer Django, and I don't think that it would be too difficult to learn it well enough for your purposes!
Regarding saving product catalog data and customer order history: I would definitely recommend using a database for your backend, which Django helps you do! Database integration is almost ridiculously easy using Django.
Here's some resources for the specific things you asked about:
Django vs. Flask
Working with HTML forms (Django) (this will help with taking user input)
filling an existing PDF form in Python (this will help with using user input to fill out the pdfs)
How to send email attachments in Python? (this will help you email your coworker the filled out pdf)
If you need more help/guidance, definitely feel free to follow up!
I'm trying to reduce the size of a string like this:
'eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpYXQiOjE0NDU0OTk3NDUsImQiOnsiYXV0aF9kYXRhIjoiZm9vIiwib3RoZXJfYXV0aF9kYXRhIjoiYmFyIiwidWlkIjoidW5pcXVlSWQxIn0sInYiOjB9.h6LV3boj0ka2PsyOjZJb8Q48ugiHlEkNksusRGtcUBk'
to something that someone could type in less then 30 seconds like this:
'aF9kYX'
and be able to turn it back to the original string too. How could I achieve that?
EDIT: I guess I'm not being clear, first I don't know if what I want is possible.
So, I have my app which asks for a token to log in, which is that JWT. But it is way too long for someone to manually type. So I supposed there was an algorithm to make this string smaller (compress it) so that it could be easier and faster to type. An example that comes to my mind of how I would use such algorithm is:
short_to_big(small_string) //Returns the original JWT
big_to_short(JWT_string) //Returns the smaller string
Stupid simple answer: use a dict to store the short string as key and the long one as value. Then you just have to generate the short string the way you like and make sure it's not already in the dict. If you need to persist the key/value, you can use almost any kind of database (sql, key:value, document, or even a csv file FWIW).
Oh and if that doesn't solve your problem then you may want to consider giving more context ;)
You need more constraints. A 200 character string contains a lot more information than a 6 character string, so either need to a lot more about the original strings (e.g. that they come from some known set of strings, or have a limited character set) or you need to store the original strings somewhere and use the string the user type as a key to a map or similar.
There are lossless compression algorithms, but these depend on knowing some probabilistic information about the string (e.g. that repeated characters are likely) and will typically expand the strings if the probabilities are wrong.
UPDATE (After question clarification and comments suggestion)
You could implement an algorithm that uniquely maps this big string into a short representation of the string and store this mapping in a dictionary. The following algorithm does not guarantee the uniqueness but should give you some path to follow.
import random
import string
def long_string_to_short(original_string, length=10):
random.seed(original_string)
filling_values = string.digits + string.ascii_letters
short_string = ''.join(random.choice(filling_values) for char_ in xrange(length))
return short_string
When calling the function you can specify an appropriate length for the short string.
Then you could:
my_mapping_dict = {}
my_long_string = 'eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpYXQiOjE0NDU0OTk3NDUsImQiOnsiYXV0aF9kYXRhIjoiZm9vIiwib3RoZXJfYXV0aF9kYXRhIjoiYmFyIiwidWlkIjoidW5pcXVlSWQxIn0sInYiOjB9.h6LV3boj0ka2PsyOjZJb8Q48ugiHlEkNksusRGtcUBk'
short_string = long_string_to_short(my_long_string)
my_mapping_dict[short_string] = my_long_string
Ok, so, because I couldn't find a solution for shrinking the string, I tried to give it a different approach, and found a solution.
Now to clarify why I wanted to log in with the token, I'm going to write what I want to do with my app:
In Firebase anyone can create an account, but I don't want that, so for that I made a group of users that were the only ones that could write or read the data.
So in order to create an account, the user would have to request a register code, (Which in reality is a JWT generated from Firebase, so that you have permission to add a user to that group I was talking about).
This app is for local use, meaning that only people that lives here are going to use it. So, back to the original question, the token is too big for someone to type (as I have said many times), and I wanted to know if I could shrink it and how. But without success I tried a different approach, which is to generate the token (from a different program), encrypt it with a random code, and upload it to a firebase, that way I give the random code to people so that users can type it in the app so that it can retrieve and decrypt the token and authenticate with it, so that finally the user has an account that has the privilege to read or write data.
Thanks for your responses and sorry if I wasted your time.
I have a strange problem.
I don't know how I should even start doing it, my written english is really bad, so I can't really google it, because it seems complicated.
I'm doing a simple database web application using Django 1.7.1, I want to use autocomplete_light for autocompletion of some fields.
I'm using SQLite Database, in DB I have some "dictionary" tables, it means that user is likely to use some names multiple times in other records, so in "master" table, I store just id of that name. Is there any way of making such ChoiceFields and MultipleChoiceFields (for "reversed" situation), that if user will write new value (not stored in "dictionary" yet) in it, it will be automatically added to "dictionary" table?
I would be really thankful for any advices, or even suggestions where should I search such thing.
I did it as simple add another like in administration panel:
http://django-autocomplete-light.readthedocs.org/en/stable-2.x.x/addanother.html
Introduction
In Django, when the data you want to display on a template is included in one object, It's f**** easy. To sum up the steps (that everyone knows actually):
You Write the right method to get your object in your model class
You Call this method in your view, passing the result to the template
You Iterate on the result in the template with a for loop, to display your objects in a table, for example.
Now, let's take a more complex situation
Let's say that the data you want to display is widely spread over different objects of different classes. You need to call many methods to get these data.
Once you call these different methods, you got different variables (unsimilar objects, integers, list of strings, etc.)
Nevertheless, you still want to pass everything to a template and display a pretty table in the end.
The problem is:
If you're passing all the raw objects containing the data you need to your template, it is completely unorganised and you can't iterate on variables in a clean way to get what you need to display your table.
The question is:
How (which structure) and where (models? views?) should I organize my complex data before passing it to a template?
My idea on this (which can be totally wrong):
For each view that need "spread data" to pass to a template, I could create a method (like viewXXX_organize_data()) in views.py, that would take the raws objects and would return a data structure with organized data that would help me to display a table by iterating on it.
About the data structure to choose, I compared lists with dictionaries
dictionaries have key so it's cleaner to call {{dict.a-key-name}} rather than {{ tabl.3}} in the template.
lists can be sorted, so when you need to sort by date the elements you want to display, dictionary is not helpful, arghh, stuck again!
What do you think about all that? Thanks for reading until there, and sharing on this!
With your question you are entering in a conceptual/architectural domain rather than in a "this particular view of the data in my project is hard to represent in the template layer of django". So I will try to give you the birds view (when flying and not on the ground) of the problem and you can decide for yourself.
From the first philosophy box in the django template language documentation it's clearly stated that templates should have as little program logic as possible. This indicates that the representation of the data used in the template should be simple and totally adapted to the template you are trying to build (this is my interpretation of it). This approach indicates that you should have a layer responsible for intermediating the representation of your data (models or other sources) and the data that your template needs to achieve the final representation you want you users to see.
This layer can simple stay in your view, in viewXXX_organize_data, or in some other form respecting to a more complex/elaborated architecture (see DCI or Hexagonal).
In your case I would start by doing something like viewXXX_organize_data() where I would use the most appropriate data structures for the template you are trying to build, while keeping some independence from the way you obtain your data (through models other services etc).
You can even think of not using you model objects directly in the template and creating template specific objects to represent a certain view of the data.
Hope this helps you make a decision. It's not a concrete answer but will help you for sure make a decision and then staying coherent all trough your app.