Develop Reference

Python catching errors from package, finding out which sublibrary exception belongs in

I've encountered several times now that I want to catch an exception that was raised by some library, but that it takes some time to actually find where that exception resides.
Example
Suppose I want to read some csv-file, except the seperator can be one of 2 values. I'd use:
import pandas
try:
mydf=pandas.read_csv('Somefile.csv', sep=';')
if not someValidityChecks(mydf): raise myExc.NotValidError
except:
mydf=pandas.read_csv('Somefile.csv', sep=',')
Now this code catches any and all exceptions, which is not really what I want (it's not Zen).
What I actually want, is to catch NotValidError, and the exception that is thrown by pandas if it encounters some invalid csv: ParserError.
But except myExc.NotValidError, ParserError won't work, because ParserError is not defined in my context. Instead, it should be pandas.errors.ParserError.
The question
Is there some quick way to find out where an exception is defined?
That there is a ParserError that I should catch, is easy enough to find out by simply letting it be thrown, the errormessage clearly shows that. Yet to find out where that error comes from, I have to dig into the stacktrace, and look at all the imports where it could be defined.
Now pandas doesn't have the most complicated structure, and guessing that the error could be in pandas.errors isn't that hard, but it still takes some time checking. Other libraries might have defined their exceptions at some more unexpected place, or spread all around. It should be easy enough to find out what actual error (including package) was thrown, right?
Environment
I'm working with Anaconda/Spyder 3.3.2, with Python 3.7

The quick way to do this is to print the module of the exception and it's qualified name:
try:
# thing that generates exception
raise pd.errors.ParserError
except Exception as e:
print(type(e).__module__, type(e).__qualname__)
pandas.errors ParserError

What is the point of using bare raise in Python

I am trying to understand this code and the use of the following pattern:
try:
...
except Exception:
raise
What is the point of re-raising the exception like this? Don't you get the same result if you remove the whole try-except block?

Yes, that code achieves nothing.

Can Syntax Errors be handled?

Consider the following code:
try:
if True a = 1 #It's missing a colon So it's a SyntaxError!!!!!!!
except SyntaxError:
print 'hey'
You'd expect it to print hey However It raises a SyntaxError, The same error I'm trying to avoid. So Can all Exceptions be handled using a try-except block? Well If SyntaxError's were an exception why is it included in the built-in exceptions? and finally how can I fix the above piece of code so that it handles the exception properly?
Note: I know what I'm trying to do Is utterly pointless and serves no real purpose

SyntaxError is a perfectly ordinary built-in exception. It is not special in any way. Only the circumstances of when it's (usually) thrown are a bit unusual.
A syntax error means that the code featuring said error cannot be parsed. It doesn't even begin to be a valid program, hence it cannot be executed. Therefore SyntaxError exceptions are raised before the program is run, and hence can't be caught from within the program.
More specifically, this exception is raised by the parser. Because the parser runs fully before the code is executed, rather then interleaved with it, a program can't catch its own syntax errors.
The parser itself is just another program though: Code invoking the parser can catch SyntaxErrors like every other exception (because it is like every other exception). Examples of "invoking the parser" include:
compile, exec, eval
import statements
Several functions in modules like ast, tokenizer, parser, etc.

Of course you need SyntaxError as a built-in exception - what else should be raised if the compiler/parser encounters a syntax error?
You're right that this error usually happens at compile time, which is before you're able to catch it (runtime). (And how would you recover from it?)
I can think of one exception, though:
>>> try:
... eval("hello =")
... except SyntaxError:
... print("Hey! Who's using eval() anyway??")
...
Hey! Who's using eval() anyway??

Any way to save a traceback object in Python

I was looking to possibly try and save a traceback object and somehow pickle it to a file that I can access. An example of a use case for this is if I am submitting some python code to a farm computer to run and it fails, it would be nice to be able to open a session and access that traceback to debug the problem rather than just seeing a log of the traceback. I do not know if there is any sort of way to do this but thought it would be worth asking why it couldn't if so.

okay so you can use traceback.print_exception(type, value, traceback[, limit[, file]]) and save it in a text or json or you can refer to docs
if you find it helpful please mark it correct or upvote thanx..:)

Depending on how you've written your code, the try statement is probably your best answer. Since any error is just a class that inherits Python's builtin Exception, you can raise custom errors everywhere you need more information about a thrown error. You just need to rename your errors or pass in an appropriate string as the first argument. If you then try your code and use the except statement except CustomError as e, you can pull all the information you want out of e in the except statement as a regular instance. Example:
Your code would be:
def script():
try: codeblock
except Exception as e: raise Error1('You hit %s error in the first block'% e)
try: codeblock 2
except Exception as e: raise Error2('You hit %s error in the second block' % e)
try: script()
except Exception as e:
with open('path\to\file.txt','w') as outFile:
outFile.write(e)
The last part is really nothing more than creating your own log file, but you have to write it down somewhere, right?
As for using the traceback module mentioned above, you can get error information out of that. Any of the commands here can get you a list of tracebacks:
http://docs.python.org/2/library/traceback.html
On the otherhand, if you're trying to avoid looking at log files, the traceback module is only going to give you the same thing a log file would, in a different format. Adding your own error statements in your code gives you more information than a cryptic ValueError about what actually happened. If you print the traceback to your special error, it might give you still more information on your issue.

Python Warning control

I would like some kind of warning to be raisen as errors, but only the first occurrence. How to do that?
I read http://docs.python.org/library/warnings.html and I dont know how to combine this two types of behaviour.

Looking at the code to warnings.py, you can't assign more than one filter action to a warning, and you can't (easily) define your own actions, like 'raise_once'.
However, if you want to raise a warning as an exception, but just once, that means that you are catching the exception. Why not put a line in your except clause that sets an 'ignore' action on that particular warning?
#!/usr/bin/python
import warnings
warnings.filterwarnings('error','Test')
for i in range(2):
try:
warnings.warn('Test');
except UserWarning, e:
print "Error caught"
warnings.filterwarnings('ignore','Test')