I am using this library : django-star-rating to rate model objects by scores given by users.
You can view the documentation here
Problem that I face:
How can I rate an object programmatically in view function rather than in the template.
Also how can I integrate it with Django Rest framework? It uses a generic relation in the model schema. So far, I have used the field as Serializer Method field but the problem with that is that it is read only and the client cannot make patch request to update rating.
Code so far:
from star_ratings.models import Rating
class ExampleModel(models.Model):
rating = GenericRelation(Rating, related_query_name='example')
from rest_framework import serializers
class ExampleSerializer(serializers.HyperlinkedModelSerializer):
rating_total = serializers.SerializerMethodField()
rating_count = serializers.SerializerMethodField()
class Meta:
model = ExampleModel
fields = '__all__'
def get_rating_total(self, obj):
if obj.rating.exists():
return obj.rating.first().total
else:
return 0
def get_rating_count(self, obj):
if obj.rating.exists():
return obj.rating.first().count
else:
return 0
From drf docs :
SerializerMethodField
This is a read-only field. It gets its value by calling a method on the
serializer class it is attached to. It can be used to add any sort of data to the serialized representation of your object.
Hence the field is read only and I can't rate it from API client side.
I know Custom field exists for Generic relation but the documentation example is not thoroughly explained.
Related
I want to annotate additional field to my model via custom queryset and access it with a function, here is a simplified code:
class CustomQuerySet(models.QuerySet):
def my_func(self):
return self.annotate(b_count=self.b_set.count()) # 'CustomQuerySet' object has no attribute 'b_set'
class A(models.Model):
objects = CustomQuerySet.as_manager()
class B(models.Model):
a = models.ForeignKey(A)
I want to access it like this models.A.objects.my_func().all(), so an extra field would be added to my model when I want to get it.
But I can't access b_set from a CustomQuerySet.
Previously I was using a #property in model A, but it makes an additional DB request every time.
How could I access a set of related model from a Custom QuerySet?
Probably, you should take a look at the Manager example that does exactly what you want: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/topics/db/managers/#adding-extra-manager-methods
from django.db import models
from django.db.models.functions import Coalesce
class PollManager(models.Manager):
def with_counts(self):
return self.annotate(
num_responses=Coalesce(models.Count("response"), 0)
)
class OpinionPoll(models.Model):
question = models.CharField(max_length=200)
objects = PollManager()
class Response(models.Model):
poll = models.ForeignKey(OpinionPoll, on_delete=models.CASCADE)
# ...
In your example, I think you can't access b_set because this attribute belongs to a model instance, not to the queryset itself.
I have a Django (1.8) Model for an underlying database table that has multiple columns that are logically a fixed-size array. For example:
from django.db import models
class Widget(models.Model):
# ...
description_1 = models.CharField(max_length=255)
description_2 = models.CharField(max_length=255)
description_3 = models.CharField(max_length=255)
# ...
I would like to be able to access these columns as if they were a collection on the model instance, e.g.:
instance = Widget.objects.get(...)
for description in instance.descriptions:
# do something with each description
My primary motivation is that I am exposing this model via Django Rest Framework (DRF), and would like the API clients to be able to easily enumerate the descriptions associated with the model. As it stands, the clients have to reference each logical 'index' manually, which makes the code repetitive.
My DRF serializer code is currently like this:
class WidgetSerializer(serializers.HyperlinkedModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Widget
There are a fixed number of descriptions for each Widget, and their ordering is important.
Is there a clean way to expose these fields as a collection on the Model object?
It really was as easy as adding a method to the Model class that returns the fields as a sequence, and then (for API clients), manually specifying that new method as a field to serialize.
So the Model definition becomes:
from django.db import models
class Widget(models.Model):
description_1 = models.CharField(max_length=255)
description_2 = models.CharField(max_length=255)
description_3 = models.CharField(max_length=255)
def descriptions(self):
return self.description_1, self.description_2, self.description_3
And the DRF serializer is updated like:
class WidgetSerializer(serializers.HyperlinkedModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Widget
fields = ('url', 'descriptions',)
This causes the API to return a JSON array for descriptions and omit all of the individual description_x fields.
I'm creating a django application which uses both the Django Rest Framework and the plain django-views as entrypoint for users.
I want to do validation both independant fields of my models, and on objects on a whole. For example:
Field: is the entered licence-plate a correct one based on a regex function. No relation to other fields.
Object: Is the entered zipcode valid for the given country. Relates to zipcode and country in the model.
For the DRF-API i use ModelSerializers which automatically call all the validators i have placed in my Model, for example:
class MyModel(models.Model):
licence_plate = CharField(max_length=20, validators=[LicencePlateValidator])
Since the validator is given in the model, the API POSTS (because i use a ModelSerializer), as well as the objects created in the django admin backend are validated.
But when i want to introduce object level validation i need to do that in the serializer's validate()-method, which means objects are only validated in the API.
I'll have to override the model's save method too, to validate the objects created in the Django admin page.
Question: This seems a bit messy to me, is there a single point where i can put the object-level validators so that they are run at the API and in the admin-page, like i did with the field-level validation (I only have to put them in my model-declaration and everything is handled)
For model-level validation, there is the Model.clean method.
It is called if you are using ModelForm (which is used by default in admin), so this solves django views and admin parts.
On the other hand, DRF does not call models' clean automatically, so you will have to do it yourself in Serializer.validate (as the doc suggests). You can do it via a serializer mixin:
class ValidateModelMixin(object)
def validate(self, attrs):
attrs = super().validate(attrs)
obj = self.Meta.model(**attrs)
obj.clean()
return attrs
class SomeModelSerializer(ValidateModelMixin, serializers.ModelSerializer):
#...
class Meta:
model = SomeModel
or write a validator:
class DelegateToModelValidator(object):
def set_context(self, serializer):
self.model = serializer.Meta.model
def __call__(self, attrs):
obj = self.model(**attrs)
obj.clean()
class SomeModelSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
#...
class Meta:
model = SomeModel
validators = (
DelegateToModelValidator(),
)
Caveats:
an extra instantiation of your models just to call clean
you will still have to add the mixin/validator to your serializers
You can create a separate function validate_zipcode_with_country(zipcode, country) which will take 2 arguments zipcode and country.
Then, we will call this method in the serializer's validate() and in our model's clean().
from django.core.exceptions import ValidationError
def validate_zipcode_with_country(zipcode, country):
# check zipcode is valid for the given country
if not valid_zipcode:
raise ValidationError("Zipcode is not valid for this country.")
Then in your serializers.py, you need to call this function in your validate() function.
class MySerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
def validate(self, attrs):
zipcode = attrs.get('zipcode')
country = attrs.get('country')
validate_zipcode_with_country(zipcode, country) # call the function
...
Similarly, you need to override the model's clean() and call this function.
class MyModel(models.Model):
def clean(self):
validate_zipcode_with_country(self.zipcode, self.country) # call this function
...
I'm writing a REST API for my Django app, and can't get POST requests to work on one model.
Here's the model in question:
class ProjectNode(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=60)
place = models.CharField(max_length=150)
time_spent = models.BigIntegerField()
parent_project = models.ForeignKey(Project, related_name='tasks')
workers = models.ManyToManyField(User, related_name='tasks_can_do')
def __str__(self):
return self.name
The User model just holds a name field at the moment.
Here's my serializer for ProjectNode:
class ProjectNodeSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = ProjectNode
fields = ('id', 'name', 'place', 'time_spent', 'workers',)
And here's the API view (from views.py):
class WebProjectNodeListView(generics.ListCreateAPIView):
queryset = ProjectNode.objects.all()
serializer_class = ProjectNodeSerializer
def pre_save(self, obj):
obj.parent_project = Project.objects.get(pk=self.request.DATA['parent_project'])
for worker_pk in self.request.DATA['workers']:
obj.workers.add(User.objects.get(pk=worker_pk))
obj.final_worker = User.objects.get(pk=self.request.DATA['final_workers'])
I tried a simpler version yesterday at first, which only had the Project ForeignKey relationship, and it seemed to work, so I thought that using add would work too, but I get an error when testing out the API with httpie (I already added some users and projects, and am sure I get their id's correctly).
Here's the request:
http POST :8000/api/tasks/ name="newtask" place="home" time_spent:=50 parent_project:=1 workers:=[1]
And I get this error:
"<ProjectNode: newtask>" needs to have a value for field "projectnode" before this many-to-many relationship can be used.
And the traceback also points to this line of code:
obj.workers.add(User.objects.get(id=worker_pk))
Now, I get the feeling that this is because I'm trying to update the relationship on the User object before a ProjectNode object is created in the database, but I'm not sure how to resolve this?
DRF doesn't works create models which are nested serializers objects or Many to Many fields.
So is necessary to override Serializer create method and create/get M2M models before create ProjectNode.
Try to override create(self, validated_data) in your serializer and work with your data inside this method..
Example:
My model Project has M2M relation with ProjectImages. In ProjectSerializer I override create method like this.
def create(self, validated_data):
try:
# Remove nested and M2m relationships from validated_data
images = validated_data.pop('projectimage_set') if 'projectimage_set' in validated_data else []
# Create project model
instance = Project(**validated_data)
if status:
instance.set_status(status)
project = instance.save()
# Create relations
for image in images:
ProjectImage.objects.create(project=project, **image)
except exceptions.ValidationError as e:
errors_messages = e.error_dict if hasattr(e, 'error_dict') else e.error_list
raise serializers.ValidationError(errors_messages)
return project
Hope this help!
I need to implement the following:
The user shall be presented with a form that will have a drop down choice menu consisting of property names. There are two types of properties: general properties, i.e. properties common for all users and custom properties, i.e. properties that each user has defined prior to that. The models would look something like that:
class GeneralPropertyName(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=20)
class CustomPropertyName(models.Model):
user = models.ForeignKey(User)
name = models.CharField(max_length=20)
The drop down menu should have all general properties and only those custom properties that pertain to the user.
First question: how to define such a model?
I need to: 1. somehow unify both properties, 2. take only those items from CustomPropertyName that pertain to the user
class SpecData(models.Model):
user = models.ForeignKey(User)
selection_title = models.CharField(max_length=20)
property = ForeignKey(GeneralPropertyName) ??UNIFY??? ForeignKey(CustomPropertyName)
Second, is there anything special that needs to be done with ModelForm?
class SpecDataForm(ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = SpecData
And the 3rd question is what needs to be done in the view? I will need to use inline formsets since I will have a few dynamic forms like that.
def index(request):
user = User.objects.get(username=request.user.username)
specdataFormSet = inlineformset_factory(User, SpecData, form=SpecDataForm, extra=30)
...
specdata_formset = specdataFormSet(instance=user, prefix='specdata_set')
...
Thanks.
EDIT: Adjusted juliocesar's suggestion to include formsets. Somehow I am getting the following error message: Cannot resolve keyword 'property' into field. Choices are: id, name, selection_title, user
def index(request):
user = User.objects.get(username=request.user.username)
user_specdata_form = UserSpecDataForm(user=user)
SpecdataFormSet = inlineformset_factory(User, SpecData, form=user_specdata_form, extra=30)
You can use a GenericForeignKey to handle it, but you still need more to solve your further questions about forms and view.
I have made an example of how you solve your problem (logged user can select from General properties and his Custom properties, non-logged user only can select General properties). I used model inheritance for the properties (In your sample code it seems that a CustomPropertyName is a PropertyName with other fields). I think inheritance is an easier and a more basic concept than ContentTypes and it fits to your needs.
NOTE: I remove some code like imports to simplify the code.
1) models.py file:
class PropertyName(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=20)
def __unicode__(self):
return self.name
class CustomPropertyName(PropertyName): # <-- Inheritance!!
user = models.ForeignKey(User)
def __unicode__(self):
return self.name
class SpecData(models.Model):
user = models.ForeignKey(User)
selection_title = models.CharField(max_length=20)
property = models.ForeignKey(PropertyName)
NOTES: The field SpecData.property points to PropertyName since all properties are saved in the PropertyName's database table.
2) forms.py file:
from django import forms
from django.db.models import Q
from models import SpecData, PropertyName
def UserSpecDataForm(user=None):
UserPropertiesQueryset = PropertyName.objects.filter(Q(custompropertyname__user=None) | Q(custompropertyname__user__id=user.id))
class SpecDataForm(forms.ModelForm):
property = forms.ModelChoiceField(queryset=UserPropertiesQueryset)
class Meta:
model = SpecData
exclude = ('user',)
return SpecDataForm
NOTES: The trick here is to generate the form SpecDataForm dynamically, by filtering properties according the user specified in the parameter.
3) views.py file:
from forms import UserSpecDataForm
def index(request):
if request.POST:
form = UserSpecDataForm(request.user)(request.POST) # instance=user
if form.is_valid():
spec_data = form.save(commit=False)
spec_data.user = request.user
spec_data.save()
else:
form = UserSpecDataForm(request.user)()
return render_to_response('properties.html', {'form': form}, context_instance=RequestContext(request))
NOTES: Nothing special here, just a call to form.UserSpecDataForm(request.user) that returns the form class and then instantiate. Also setted the logged-in user to the object returned on save since It was excluded in the form to not show in front-end.
Following this basic example you can do the same with formsets if you need it.
UPDATE:
Formset can be used by adding following code to the view:
user_specdata_form = UserSpecDataForm(user=request.user)
SpecdataFormSet = inlineformset_factory(User, SpecData, form=user_specdata_form, extra=30)
The complete project sample can be downloaded from http://ge.tt/904Wg7O1/v/0
Hope this helps
1a) have you looked into django's ContentType framework this will allow you to have generic foreign keys and you can put restrictions on what types of models are acceptable to store in.
1b) I think that the validation for accepting what type of foreign key is acceptable shouldn't be in your model but should be part of your form validation before saving.
2) If you do use a model form you're going to have to define your own custom widget for the propery field. This means you're probably going to have to write you're own render function to render the html from the field. You should also define your own validation function on the form to make sure that only the appropriate data is acceptable to save.
3) I don't think you'll have to do anything you aren't already doing in the views
Use GenericForeignKey:
class SpecData(models.Model):
user = models.ForeignKey(User)
selection_title = models.CharField(max_length=20)
content_type = models.ForeignKey(ContentType)
object_id = models.PositiveIntegerField()
property = GenericForeignKey('content_type', 'object_id')
You can use this to combine the two fields(type & id) into a single choice field.
One way is that you have only one model, make user nullable:
class PropertyName(models.Model):
user = models.ForeignKey(User, null=True, blank=True)
name = models.CharField(max_length=20)
class SpecData(models.Model):
user = models.ForeignKey(User)
selection_title = models.CharField(max_length=20)
property = ForeignKey(PropertyName)
So, if user is not set, it is a general property. If it is set, it is related to this user.
However, please note that if you need unique property names, that NULL != NULL.
Of course, the suggested GenericForeignKey solution is better for some cases.
Also, you can easily make the normal (non-model) form with that you describe and separate form logic from model logic.