Concatenating multiple pandas DataFrames - python

I have a large number of DataFrames with similar prefix df_, that look like:
df_1
df_x
df_ab
.
.
.
df_1a
df_2b
Of course I can do final_df = pd.concat([df_1, df_x, df_ab, ... df_1a, df_2b], axis = 1)
The issue is that although the prefix df_ will always be there, the rest of the dataframes' names keep changing and do not have any pattern. So, I have to constantly update the list of dataframes in pd.concat to create the 'final_df`, which is cumbersome.
Question: is there anyway to tell python to concatenate all defined dataframes in the namespace (only) starting with df_ and create the final_df or at least return a list of all such dataframes that I can then manually feed into pd.concat?

You could do something like this, using the built-in function globals():
def concat_all(prefix='df_'):
dfs = [df for name, df in globals().items() if name.startswith(prefix)
and isinstance(df, pd.DataFrame)]
return pd.concat(dfs, axis=1)
Logic:
Filter down your global namespace to DataFrames that start with prefix
Put these in a list (concat doesn't take a generator)
Call concat() on the first axis.
Example:
import pandas as pd
df_1 = pd.DataFrame([[0, 1], [2, 3]])
df_2 = pd.DataFrame([[4, 5], [6, 7]])
other_df = df_1.copy() * 2 # ignore this
s_1 = pd.Series([1, 2, 3, 4]) # and this
final_df = concat_all()
final_df
0 1 0 1
0 0 1 4 5
1 2 3 6 7
Always use globals() with caution. It gets you a dictionary of the entire module namespace.
You need globals() rather than locals() because the dictionary is being used inside a function. locals() would be null here at time of use.

Related

Is there a way to use a method/function as an expression for .loc() in pandas?

I've been going crazy trying to figure this out. I'm trying to avoid using df.iterrows() to iterate through the rows of a dataframe, as it's quite time consuming and .loc() is better from what I've seen.
I know this works:
df = df.loc[df.number == 3, :]
And that'll basically set df to be each row where the "number" column is equal to 3.
But, I get an error when I try something like this:
df = df.loc[someFunction(df.number), :]
What I want is to get every row where someFunction() returns True whenever the "number" value of said row is set as the parameter.
For some reason, it's passing the entire column (the dataframe's entire "number" column, in this example), instead of the value of a row as it iterates through the row, like the previous example.
Again, I know I can just use a for loop and .iterrows(), but I'm working with around 280,000 rows and it just takes longer than I'd like. Also have tried using a lambda function among other things.
Apply is slow - if you can, try to just put the complex vectorization logic in the function by taking in series as arguments:
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame()
df['a'] = [7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2]
df['b'] = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
def my_func(series1, series2):
return (series2 > 3) | (series1 == series2)
df.loc[my_func(df.b, df.a), 'new_column_name'] = True
I think this is what you need:
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame({"number": [x for x in range(10)]})
def someFunction(row):
if row > 5:
return True
else:
return False
df = df.loc[df.number.apply(someFunction)]
print(df)
Output:
number
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
You can use an anonymous function with .loc
x refers to the dataframe you are indexing
df.loc[lambda x: x.number > 5, :]
Two options I can think of:
Create a new column using the pandas apply() method and a lambda function that returns either true or false depending on someFunction(). Then, use loc to filter on the new column you just created.
Use a for loop and df.itertuples() as it is way faster than iterrows. Make sure to look up the documentation as the syntax is slightly different for itertuples
Just use something like this will work
df = pd.DataFrame()
df['number'] = np.arange(10)
display(df[df['number']>5])
display(df[df['number']>2][df['number']<7])

Python: for cycle in range over files

I am trying to create a list that takes values from different files.
I have three dataframes called for example "df1","df2","df3"
each files contains two columns with data, so for example "df1" looks like this:
0, 1
1, 4
7, 7
I want to create a list that takes a value from first row in second column in each file, so it should look like this
F=[1,value from df2,value from df3]
my try
import pandas as pd
df1 = pd.read_csv(file1)
df2 = pd.read_csv(file2)
df3 = pd.read_csv(file3)
F=[]
for i in range(3):
F.append(df{"i"}[1][0])
probably that is not how to iterate over, but I cannot figure out the correct way
You can use iloc and list comprehension
vals = [df.iloc[0, 1] for df in [df1,df2,df3]]
iloc will get value from first row (index 0) and second column (index 1). If you wanted, say, value from third row and fourth column, you'd do .iloc[2, 3] and so forth.
As suggested by #jpp, you may use iat instead:
vals = [df.iat[0, 1] for df in [df1,df2,df3]]
For difference between them, check this and this question

Iterating over different data frames using an iterator

Suppose I have n number of data frames df_1, df_2, df_3, ... df_n, containing respectively columns named SPEED1 ,SPEED2, SPEED3, ..., SPEEDn, for instance:
import numpy as np
df_1 = pd.DataFrame({'SPEED1':np.random.uniform(0,600,100)})
df_2 = pd.DataFrame({'SPEED2':np.random.uniform(0,600,100)})
and I want to make the same changes to all of the data frames. How do I do so by defining a function on similar lines?
def modify(df,nr):
df_invalid_nr=df_nr[df_nr['SPEED'+str(nr)]>500]
df_valid_nr=~df_invalid_nr
Invalid_cycles_nr=df[df_invalid]
df=df[df_valid]
print(Invalid_cycles_nr)
print(df)
So, when I try to run the above function
modify(df_1,1)
It returns the entire data frame without modification and the invalid cycles as an empty array. I am guessing I need to define the modification on the global dataframe somewhere in the function for this to work.
I am also not sure if I could do this another way, say just looping an iterator through all the data frames. But, I am not sure it will work.
for i in range(1,n+1):
df_invalid_i=df_i[df_i['SPEED'+str(i)]>500]
df_valid_i=~df_invalid_i
Invalid_cycles_i=df[df_invalid]
df=df[df_valid]
print(Invalid_cycles_i)
print(df)
How do I, in general, access df_1 using an iterator? It seems to be a problem.
Any help would be appreciated, thanks!
Solution
Inputs
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
df_1 = pd.DataFrame({'SPEED1':np.random.uniform(1,600,100))
df_2 = pd.DataFrame({'SPEED2':np.random.uniform(1,600,100))
Code
To my mind a better approach would be to store your dfs into a list and enumerate over it for augmenting informations into your dfs to create a valid column:
for idx, df in enumerate([df_1, df_2]):
col = 'SPEED'+str(idx+1)
df['valid'] = df[col] <= 500
print(df_1)
SPEED valid
0 516.395756 False
1 14.643694 True
2 478.085372 True
3 592.831029 False
4 1.431332 True
You can then filter for valid or invalid with df_1[df_1.valid] or df_1[df_1.valid == False]
It is a solution to fit your problem, see Another solution that may be more clean and Notes below for explanations you need.
Another (better?) solution
If it is possible for you re-think your code. Each DataFrame has one column speed, then name it SPEED:
dfs = dict(df_1=pd.DataFrame({'SPEED':np.random.uniform(0,600,100)}),
df_2=pd.DataFrame({'SPEED':np.random.uniform(0,600,100)}))
It will allow you to do the following one liner:
dfs = dict(map(lambda key_val: (key_val[0],
key_val[1].assign(valid = key_val[1]['SPEED'] <= 500)),
dfs.items()))
print(dfs['df_1'])
SPEED valid
0 516.395756 False
1 14.643694 True
2 478.085372 True
3 592.831029 False
4 1.431332 True
Explanations:
dfs.items() returns a list of key (i.e. names) and values (i.e. DataFrames)
map(foo, bar) apply the function foo (see this answer, and DataFrame assign) to all the elements of bar (i.e. to all the key/value pairs of dfs.items().
dict() cast the map to a dict.
Notes
About modify
Notice that your function modify is not returning anything... I suggest you to have more readings on mutability and immutability in Python. This article is interesting.
You can then test the following for instance:
def modify(df):
df=df[df.SPEED1<0.5]
#The change in df is on the scope of the function only,
#it will not modify your input, return the df...
return df
#... and affect the output to apply changes
df_1 = modify(df_1)
About access df_1 using an iterator
Notice that when you do:
for i in range(1,n+1):
df_i something
df_i in your loop will call the object df_i for each iteration (and not df_1 etc.)
To call an object by its name, use globals()['df_'+str(i)] instead (Assuming that df_1 to df_n+1 are located in globals()) - from this answer.
To my mind it is not a clean approach. I don't know how do you create your DataFrames but if it is possible for your I will suggest you to store them into a dictionary instead affecting manually:
dfs = {}
dfs['df_1'] = ...
or a bit more automatically if df_1 to df_n already exist - according to first part of vestland answer :
dfs = dict((var, eval(var)) for
var in dir() if
isinstance(eval(var), pd.core.frame.DataFrame) and 'df_' in var)
Then it would be easier for your to iterate over your DataFrames:
for i in range(1,n+1):
dfs['df_'+str(i)'] something
You can use the globals() function which allows you to get a variable by his name.
I just add df_i = globals()["df_"+str(i)] at the begining of the for loop :
for i in range(1,n+1):
df_i = globals()["df_"+str(i)]
df_invalid_i=df_i.loc[df_i['SPEED'+str(i)]>500]
df_valid_i=~df_invalid_i
Invalid_cycles_i=df[df_invalid]
df=df[df_valid]
print(Invalid_cycles_i)
print(df)
Your code sample leaves me a little confused, but focusing on
I want to make the same changes to all of the data frames.
and
How do I, in general, access df_1 using an iterator?
you can do exactly that by organizing your dataframes (dfs) in a dictionary (dict).
Here's how:
Assuming you've got a bunch of variables in your namespace...
# Imports
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
# A few dataframes with random numbers
# df_1
np.random.seed(123)
rows = 12
rng = pd.date_range('1/1/2017', periods=rows, freq='D')
df_1 = pd.DataFrame(np.random.randint(100,150,size=(rows, 2)), columns=['a', 'b'])
df_1 = df_1.set_index(rng)
# df_2
np.random.seed(456)
rows = 12
rng = pd.date_range('1/1/2017', periods=rows, freq='D')
df_2 = pd.DataFrame(np.random.randint(100,150,size=(rows, 2)), columns=['c', 'd'])
df_2 = df_2.set_index(rng)
# df_3
np.random.seed(789)
rows = 12
rng = pd.date_range('1/1/2017', periods=rows, freq='D')
df_3 = pd.DataFrame(np.random.randint(100,150,size=(rows, 2)), columns=['e', 'f'])
df_3 = df_3.set_index(rng)
...you can identify all that are dataframes using:
alldfs = [var for var in dir() if isinstance(eval(var), pd.core.frame.DataFrame)]
If you've got a lot of different dataframes but would only like to focus on those that have a prefix like 'df_', you can identify those by...
dfNames = []
for elem in alldfs:
if str(elem)[:3] == 'df_':
dfNames.append(elem)
... and then organize them in a dict using:
myFrames = {}
for dfName in dfNames:
myFrames[dfName] = eval(dfName)
From that list of interesting dataframes, you can subset those that you'd like to do something with. Here's how you focus only on df_1 and df_2:
invalid = ['df_3']
for inv in invalid:
myFrames.pop(inv, None)
Now you can reference ALL your valid dfs by looping through them:
for key in myFrames.keys():
print(myFrames[key])
And that should cover the...
How do I, in general, access df_1 using an iterator?
...part of the question.
And you can of course reference a single dataframe by its name / key in the dict:
print(myFrames['df_1'])
From here you can do something with ALL columns in ALL dataframes.
for key in myFrames.keys():
myFrames[key] = myFrames[key]*10
print(myFrames[key])
Or, being a bit more pythonic, you can specify a lambda function and apply that to a subset of columns
# A function
decimator = lambda x: x/10
# A subset of columns:
myCols = ['SPEED1', 'SPEED2']
Apply that function to your subset of columns in your dataframes of interest:
for key in myFrames.keys():
for col in list(myFrames[key]):
if col in myCols:
myFrames[key][col] = myFrames[key][col].apply(decimator)
print(myFrames[key][col])
So, back to your function...
modify(df_1,1)
... here's my take on it wrapped in a function.
First we'll redefine the dataframes and the function.
Oh, and with this setup, you're going to have to obtain all dfs OUTSIDE your function with alldfs = [var for var in dir() if isinstance(eval(var), pd.core.frame.DataFrame)].
Here's the datasets and the function for an easy copy-paste:
# Imports
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
# A few dataframes with random numbers
# df_1
np.random.seed(123)
rows = 12
rng = pd.date_range('1/1/2017', periods=rows, freq='D')
df_1 = pd.DataFrame(np.random.randint(100,150,size=(rows, 3)), columns=['SPEED1', 'SPEED2', 'SPEED3'])
df_1 = df_1.set_index(rng)
# df_2
np.random.seed(456)
rows = 12
rng = pd.date_range('1/1/2017', periods=rows, freq='D')
df_2 = pd.DataFrame(np.random.randint(100,150,size=(rows, 3)), columns=['SPEED1', 'SPEED2', 'SPEED3'])
df_2 = df_2.set_index(rng)
# df_3
np.random.seed(789)
rows = 12
rng = pd.date_range('1/1/2017', periods=rows, freq='D')
df_3 = pd.DataFrame(np.random.randint(100,150,size=(rows, 3)), columns=['SPEED1', 'SPEED2', 'SPEED3'])
df_3 = df_3.set_index(rng)
# A function that divides columns by 10
decimator = lambda x: x/10
# A reference to all available dataframes
alldfs = [var for var in dir() if isinstance(eval(var), pd.core.frame.DataFrame)]
# A function as per your request
def modify(dfs, cols, fx):
""" Define a subset of available dataframes and list of interesting columns, and
apply a function on those columns.
"""
# Subset all dataframes with names that start with df_
dfNames = []
for elem in alldfs:
if str(elem)[:3] == 'df_':
dfNames.append(elem)
# Organize those dfs in a dict if they match the dataframe names of interest
myFrames = {}
for dfName in dfNames:
if dfName in dfs:
myFrames[dfName] = eval(dfName)
print(myFrames)
# Apply fx to the cols of your dfs subset
for key in myFrames.keys():
for col in list(myFrames[key]):
if col in cols:
myFrames[key][col] = myFrames[key][col].apply(decimator)
# A testrun. Results in screenshots below
modify(dfs = ['df_1', 'df_2'], cols = ['SPEED1', 'SPEED2'], fx = decimator)
Here are dataframes df_1 and df_2 before manipulation:
Here are the dataframes after manipulation:
Anyway, this is how I would approach it.
Hope you'll find it useful!

pandas appending df1 to df2 get 0s/NaNs in result

I have 2 dataframes. df1 comprises a Series of values.
df1 = pd.DataFrame({'winnings': cumsums_winnings_s, 'returns':cumsums_returns_s, 'spent': cumsums_spent_s, 'runs': cumsums_runs_s, 'wins': cumsums_wins_s, 'expected': cumsums_expected_s}, columns=["winnings", "returns", "runs", "wins", "expected"])
df2 runs each row through a function which takes 3 columns and produces a result for each row - specialSauce
df2= pd.DataFrame(list(map(lambda w,r,e: doStuff(w,r,e), df1['wins'], df1['runs'], df1['expected'])), columns=["specialSauce"])
print(df2.append(df1))
produces all the df1 columns but NaN for the df1 (and vice versa if df1/df2 switched in append)
So the problem I has is how to append these 2 dataframes correctly.
As I understand things, your issue seems to be related to the fact that you get NaN's in the result DataFrame.
The reason for this is that you are trying to .append() one dataframe to the other while they don't have the same columns.
df2 has one extra column, the one created with apply() and doStuff, while df1 does not have that column. When trying to append one pd.DataFrame to the other the result will have all columns both pd.DataFrame objects. Naturally, you will have some NaN's for ['specialSauce'] since this column does not exist in df1.
This would be the same if you were to use pd.concat(), both methods do the same thing in this case. The one thing that you could do to bring the result closer to your desired result is use the ignore_index flag like this:
>> df2.append(df1, ignore_index=True)
This would at least give you a 'fresh' index for the result pd.DataFrame.
EDIT
If what you're looking for is to "append" the result of doStuff to the end of your existing df, in the form of a new column (['specialSauce']), then what you'll have to do is use pd.concat() like this:
>> pd.concat([df1, df2], axis=1)
This will return the result pd.DataFrame as you want it.
If you had a pd.Series to add to the columns of df1 then you'd need to add it like this:
>> df1['specialSauce'] = <'specialSauce values'>
I hope that helps, if not please rephrase the description of what you're after.
Ok, there are a couple of things going on here. You've left code out and I had to fill in the gaps. For example you did not define doStuff, so I had to.
doStuff = lambda w, r, e: w + r + e
With that defined, your code does not run. I had to guess what you were trying to do. I'm guessing that you want to have an additional column called 'specialSauce' adjacent to your other columns.
So, this is how I set it up and solved the problem.
Setup and Solution
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
np.random.seed(314)
df = pd.DataFrame(np.random.randn(100, 6),
columns=["winnings", "returns",
"spent", "runs",
"wins", "expected"]).cumsum()
doStuff = lambda w, r, e: w + r + e
df['specialSauce'] = df[['wins', 'runs', 'expected']].apply(lambda x: doStuff(*x), axis=1)
print df.head()
winnings returns spent runs wins expected specialSauce
0 0.166085 0.781964 0.852285 -0.707071 -0.931657 0.886661 -0.752067
1 -0.055704 1.163688 0.079710 0.155916 -1.212917 -0.045265 -1.102266
2 -0.554241 1.928014 0.271214 -0.462848 0.452802 1.692924 1.682878
3 0.627985 3.047389 -1.594841 -1.099262 -0.308115 4.356977 2.949601
4 0.796156 3.228755 -0.273482 -0.661442 -0.111355 2.827409 2.054611
Also
You tried to use pd.DataFrame.append(). Per the linked documentation, it attaches the DataFrame specified as the argument to the end of the DataFrame that is being appended to. You would have wanted to use pd.DataFrame.concat().

Creating an empty Pandas DataFrame, and then filling it

I'm starting from the pandas DataFrame documentation here: Introduction to data structures
I'd like to iteratively fill the DataFrame with values in a time series kind of calculation. I'd like to initialize the DataFrame with columns A, B, and timestamp rows, all 0 or all NaN.
I'd then add initial values and go over this data calculating the new row from the row before, say row[A][t] = row[A][t-1]+1 or so.
I'm currently using the code as below, but I feel it's kind of ugly and there must be a way to do this with a DataFrame directly or just a better way in general.
Note: I'm using Python 2.7.
import datetime as dt
import pandas as pd
import scipy as s
if __name__ == '__main__':
base = dt.datetime.today().date()
dates = [ base - dt.timedelta(days=x) for x in range(0,10) ]
dates.sort()
valdict = {}
symbols = ['A','B', 'C']
for symb in symbols:
valdict[symb] = pd.Series( s.zeros( len(dates)), dates )
for thedate in dates:
if thedate > dates[0]:
for symb in valdict:
valdict[symb][thedate] = 1+valdict[symb][thedate - dt.timedelta(days=1)]
print valdict
NEVER grow a DataFrame row-wise!
TLDR; (just read the bold text)
Most answers here will tell you how to create an empty DataFrame and fill it out, but no one will tell you that it is a bad thing to do.
Here is my advice: Accumulate data in a list, not a DataFrame.
Use a list to collect your data, then initialise a DataFrame when you are ready. Either a list-of-lists or list-of-dicts format will work, pd.DataFrame accepts both.
data = []
for row in some_function_that_yields_data():
data.append(row)
df = pd.DataFrame(data)
pd.DataFrame converts the list of rows (where each row is a scalar value) into a DataFrame. If your function yields DataFrames instead, call pd.concat.
Pros of this approach:
It is always cheaper to append to a list and create a DataFrame in one go than it is to create an empty DataFrame (or one of NaNs) and append to it over and over again.
Lists also take up less memory and are a much lighter data structure to work with, append, and remove (if needed).
dtypes are automatically inferred (rather than assigning object to all of them).
A RangeIndex is automatically created for your data, instead of you having to take care to assign the correct index to the row you are appending at each iteration.
If you aren't convinced yet, this is also mentioned in the documentation:
Iteratively appending rows to a DataFrame can be more computationally
intensive than a single concatenate. A better solution is to append
those rows to a list and then concatenate the list with the original
DataFrame all at once.
*** Update for pandas >= 1.4: append is now DEPRECATED! ***
As of pandas 1.4, append has now been deprecated! Use pd.concat instead. See the release notes
These options are horrible
append or concat inside a loop
Here is the biggest mistake I've seen from beginners:
df = pd.DataFrame(columns=['A', 'B', 'C'])
for a, b, c in some_function_that_yields_data():
df = df.append({'A': i, 'B': b, 'C': c}, ignore_index=True) # yuck
# or similarly,
# df = pd.concat([df, pd.Series({'A': i, 'B': b, 'C': c})], ignore_index=True)
Memory is re-allocated for every append or concat operation you have. Couple this with a loop and you have a quadratic complexity operation.
The other mistake associated with df.append is that users tend to forget append is not an in-place function, so the result must be assigned back. You also have to worry about the dtypes:
df = pd.DataFrame(columns=['A', 'B', 'C'])
df = df.append({'A': 1, 'B': 12.3, 'C': 'xyz'}, ignore_index=True)
df.dtypes
A object # yuck!
B float64
C object
dtype: object
Dealing with object columns is never a good thing, because pandas cannot vectorize operations on those columns. You will need to do this to fix it:
df.infer_objects().dtypes
A int64
B float64
C object
dtype: object
loc inside a loop
I have also seen loc used to append to a DataFrame that was created empty:
df = pd.DataFrame(columns=['A', 'B', 'C'])
for a, b, c in some_function_that_yields_data():
df.loc[len(df)] = [a, b, c]
As before, you have not pre-allocated the amount of memory you need each time, so the memory is re-grown each time you create a new row. It's just as bad as append, and even more ugly.
Empty DataFrame of NaNs
And then, there's creating a DataFrame of NaNs, and all the caveats associated therewith.
df = pd.DataFrame(columns=['A', 'B', 'C'], index=range(5))
df
A B C
0 NaN NaN NaN
1 NaN NaN NaN
2 NaN NaN NaN
3 NaN NaN NaN
4 NaN NaN NaN
It creates a DataFrame of object columns, like the others.
df.dtypes
A object # you DON'T want this
B object
C object
dtype: object
Appending still has all the issues as the methods above.
for i, (a, b, c) in enumerate(some_function_that_yields_data()):
df.iloc[i] = [a, b, c]
The Proof is in the Pudding
Timing these methods is the fastest way to see just how much they differ in terms of their memory and utility.
Benchmarking code for reference.
Here's a couple of suggestions:
Use date_range for the index:
import datetime
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
todays_date = datetime.datetime.now().date()
index = pd.date_range(todays_date-datetime.timedelta(10), periods=10, freq='D')
columns = ['A','B', 'C']
Note: we could create an empty DataFrame (with NaNs) simply by writing:
df_ = pd.DataFrame(index=index, columns=columns)
df_ = df_.fillna(0) # With 0s rather than NaNs
To do these type of calculations for the data, use a NumPy array:
data = np.array([np.arange(10)]*3).T
Hence we can create the DataFrame:
In [10]: df = pd.DataFrame(data, index=index, columns=columns)
In [11]: df
Out[11]:
A B C
2012-11-29 0 0 0
2012-11-30 1 1 1
2012-12-01 2 2 2
2012-12-02 3 3 3
2012-12-03 4 4 4
2012-12-04 5 5 5
2012-12-05 6 6 6
2012-12-06 7 7 7
2012-12-07 8 8 8
2012-12-08 9 9 9
If you simply want to create an empty data frame and fill it with some incoming data frames later, try this:
newDF = pd.DataFrame() #creates a new dataframe that's empty
newDF = newDF.append(oldDF, ignore_index = True) # ignoring index is optional
# try printing some data from newDF
print newDF.head() #again optional
In this example I am using this pandas doc to create a new data frame and then using append to write to the newDF with data from oldDF.
If I have to keep appending new data into this newDF from more than
one oldDFs, I just use a for loop to iterate over
pandas.DataFrame.append()
Note: append() is deprecated since version 1.4.0. Use concat()
Initialize empty frame with column names
import pandas as pd
col_names = ['A', 'B', 'C']
my_df = pd.DataFrame(columns = col_names)
my_df
Add a new record to a frame
my_df.loc[len(my_df)] = [2, 4, 5]
You also might want to pass a dictionary:
my_dic = {'A':2, 'B':4, 'C':5}
my_df.loc[len(my_df)] = my_dic
Append another frame to your existing frame
col_names = ['A', 'B', 'C']
my_df2 = pd.DataFrame(columns = col_names)
my_df = my_df.append(my_df2)
Performance considerations
If you are adding rows inside a loop consider performance issues. For around the first 1000 records "my_df.loc" performance is better, but it gradually becomes slower by increasing the number of records in the loop.
If you plan to do thins inside a big loop (say 10M‌ records or so), you are better off using a mixture of these two;
fill a dataframe with iloc until the size gets around 1000, then append it to the original dataframe, and empty the temp dataframe.
This would boost your performance by around 10 times.
Simply:
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
df=pd.DataFrame(np.zeros([rows,columns])
Then fill it.
Assume a dataframe with 19 rows
index=range(0,19)
index
columns=['A']
test = pd.DataFrame(index=index, columns=columns)
Keeping Column A as a constant
test['A']=10
Keeping column b as a variable given by a loop
for x in range(0,19):
test.loc[[x], 'b'] = pd.Series([x], index = [x])
You can replace the first x in pd.Series([x], index = [x]) with any value
This is my way to make a dynamic dataframe from several lists with a loop
x = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]
y = [22,12,34,22,65,24,12,11]
z = ['as','ss','wa', 'ss','er','fd','ga','mf']
names = ['Bob', 'Liz', 'chop']
a loop
def dataF(x,y,z,names):
res = []
for t in zip(x,y,z):
res.append(t)
return pd.DataFrame(res,columns=names)
Result
dataF(x,y,z,names)
# import pandas library
import pandas as pd
# create a dataframe
my_df = pd.DataFrame({"A": ["shirt"], "B": [1200]})
# show the dataframe
print(my_df)

Categories

Resources