Related
In Python, how can we find out the command line arguments that were provided for a script, and process them?
For some more specific examples, see Implementing a "[command] [action] [parameter]" style command-line interfaces? and How do I format positional argument help using Python's optparse?.
import sys
print("\n".join(sys.argv))
sys.argv is a list that contains all the arguments passed to the script on the command line. sys.argv[0] is the script name.
Basically,
import sys
print(sys.argv[1:])
The canonical solution in the standard library is argparse (docs):
Here is an example:
from argparse import ArgumentParser
parser = ArgumentParser()
parser.add_argument("-f", "--file", dest="filename",
help="write report to FILE", metavar="FILE")
parser.add_argument("-q", "--quiet",
action="store_false", dest="verbose", default=True,
help="don't print status messages to stdout")
args = parser.parse_args()
argparse supports (among other things):
Multiple options in any order.
Short and long options.
Default values.
Generation of a usage help message.
Just going around evangelizing for argparse which is better for these reasons.. essentially:
(copied from the link)
argparse module can handle positional
and optional arguments, while
optparse can handle only optional
arguments
argparse isn’t dogmatic about
what your command line interface
should look like - options like -file
or /file are supported, as are
required options. Optparse refuses to
support these features, preferring
purity over practicality
argparse produces more
informative usage messages, including
command-line usage determined from
your arguments, and help messages for
both positional and optional
arguments. The optparse module
requires you to write your own usage
string, and has no way to display
help for positional arguments.
argparse supports action that
consume a variable number of
command-line args, while optparse
requires that the exact number of
arguments (e.g. 1, 2, or 3) be known
in advance
argparse supports parsers that
dispatch to sub-commands, while
optparse requires setting
allow_interspersed_args and doing the
parser dispatch manually
And my personal favorite:
argparse allows the type and
action parameters to add_argument()
to be specified with simple
callables, while optparse requires
hacking class attributes like
STORE_ACTIONS or CHECK_METHODS to get
proper argument checking
There is also argparse stdlib module (an "impovement" on stdlib's optparse module). Example from the introduction to argparse:
# script.py
import argparse
if __name__ == '__main__':
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
parser.add_argument(
'integers', metavar='int', type=int, choices=range(10),
nargs='+', help='an integer in the range 0..9')
parser.add_argument(
'--sum', dest='accumulate', action='store_const', const=sum,
default=max, help='sum the integers (default: find the max)')
args = parser.parse_args()
print(args.accumulate(args.integers))
Usage:
$ script.py 1 2 3 4
4
$ script.py --sum 1 2 3 4
10
If you need something fast and not very flexible
main.py:
import sys
first_name = sys.argv[1]
last_name = sys.argv[2]
print("Hello " + first_name + " " + last_name)
Then run python main.py James Smith
to produce the following output:
Hello James Smith
The docopt library is really slick. It builds an argument dict from the usage string for your app.
Eg from the docopt readme:
"""Naval Fate.
Usage:
naval_fate.py ship new <name>...
naval_fate.py ship <name> move <x> <y> [--speed=<kn>]
naval_fate.py ship shoot <x> <y>
naval_fate.py mine (set|remove) <x> <y> [--moored | --drifting]
naval_fate.py (-h | --help)
naval_fate.py --version
Options:
-h --help Show this screen.
--version Show version.
--speed=<kn> Speed in knots [default: 10].
--moored Moored (anchored) mine.
--drifting Drifting mine.
"""
from docopt import docopt
if __name__ == '__main__':
arguments = docopt(__doc__, version='Naval Fate 2.0')
print(arguments)
One way to do it is using sys.argv. This will print the script name as the first argument and all the other parameters that you pass to it.
import sys
for arg in sys.argv:
print arg
#set default args as -h , if no args:
if len(sys.argv) == 1: sys.argv[1:] = ["-h"]
I use optparse myself, but really like the direction Simon Willison is taking with his recently introduced optfunc library. It works by:
"introspecting a function
definition (including its arguments
and their default values) and using
that to construct a command line
argument parser."
So, for example, this function definition:
def geocode(s, api_key='', geocoder='google', list_geocoders=False):
is turned into this optparse help text:
Options:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
-l, --list-geocoders
-a API_KEY, --api-key=API_KEY
-g GEOCODER, --geocoder=GEOCODER
I like getopt from stdlib, eg:
try:
opts, args = getopt.getopt(sys.argv[1:], 'h', ['help'])
except getopt.GetoptError, err:
usage(err)
for opt, arg in opts:
if opt in ('-h', '--help'):
usage()
if len(args) != 1:
usage("specify thing...")
Lately I have been wrapping something similiar to this to make things less verbose (eg; making "-h" implicit).
As you can see optparse "The optparse module is deprecated with and will not be developed further; development will continue with the argparse module."
Pocoo's click is more intuitive, requires less boilerplate, and is at least as powerful as argparse.
The only weakness I've encountered so far is that you can't do much customization to help pages, but that usually isn't a requirement and docopt seems like the clear choice when it is.
import argparse
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Process some integers.')
parser.add_argument('integers', metavar='N', type=int, nargs='+',
help='an integer for the accumulator')
parser.add_argument('--sum', dest='accumulate', action='store_const',
const=sum, default=max,
help='sum the integers (default: find the max)')
args = parser.parse_args()
print(args.accumulate(args.integers))
Assuming the Python code above is saved into a file called prog.py
$ python prog.py -h
Ref-link: https://docs.python.org/3.3/library/argparse.html
You may be interested in a little Python module I wrote to make handling of command line arguments even easier (open source and free to use) - Commando
Yet another option is argh. It builds on argparse, and lets you write things like:
import argh
# declaring:
def echo(text):
"Returns given word as is."
return text
def greet(name, greeting='Hello'):
"Greets the user with given name. The greeting is customizable."
return greeting + ', ' + name
# assembling:
parser = argh.ArghParser()
parser.add_commands([echo, greet])
# dispatching:
if __name__ == '__main__':
parser.dispatch()
It will automatically generate help and so on, and you can use decorators to provide extra guidance on how the arg-parsing should work.
I recommend looking at docopt as a simple alternative to these others.
docopt is a new project that works by parsing your --help usage message rather than requiring you to implement everything yourself. You just have to put your usage message in the POSIX format.
Also with python3 you might find convenient to use Extended Iterable Unpacking to handle optional positional arguments without additional dependencies:
try:
_, arg1, arg2, arg3, *_ = sys.argv + [None] * 2
except ValueError:
print("Not enough arguments", file=sys.stderr) # unhandled exception traceback is meaningful enough also
exit(-1)
The above argv unpack makes arg2 and arg3 "optional" - if they are not specified in argv, they will be None, while if the first is not specified, ValueError will be thouwn:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "test.py", line 3, in <module>
_, arg1, arg2, arg3, *_ = sys.argv + [None] * 2
ValueError: not enough values to unpack (expected at least 4, got 3)
My solution is entrypoint2. Example:
from entrypoint2 import entrypoint
#entrypoint
def add(file, quiet=True):
''' This function writes report.
:param file: write report to FILE
:param quiet: don't print status messages to stdout
'''
print file,quiet
help text:
usage: report.py [-h] [-q] [--debug] file
This function writes report.
positional arguments:
file write report to FILE
optional arguments:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
-q, --quiet don't print status messages to stdout
--debug set logging level to DEBUG
import sys
# Command line arguments are stored into sys.argv
# print(sys.argv[1:])
# I used the slice [1:] to print all the elements except the first
# This because the first element of sys.argv is the program name
# So the first argument is sys.argv[1], the second is sys.argv[2] ecc
print("File name: " + sys.argv[0])
print("Arguments:")
for i in sys.argv[1:]:
print(i)
Let's name this file command_line.py and let's run it:
C:\Users\simone> python command_line.py arg1 arg2 arg3 ecc
File name: command_line.py
Arguments:
arg1
arg2
arg3
ecc
Now let's write a simple program, sum.py:
import sys
try:
print(sum(map(float, sys.argv[1:])))
except:
print("An error has occurred")
Result:
C:\Users\simone> python sum.py 10 4 6 3
23
This handles simple switches, value switches with optional alternative flags.
import sys
# [IN] argv - array of args
# [IN] switch - switch to seek
# [IN] val - expecting value
# [IN] alt - switch alternative
# returns value or True if val not expected
def parse_cmd(argv,switch,val=None,alt=None):
for idx, x in enumerate(argv):
if x == switch or x == alt:
if val:
if len(argv) > (idx+1):
if not argv[idx+1].startswith('-'):
return argv[idx+1]
else:
return True
//expecting a value for -i
i = parse_cmd(sys.argv[1:],"-i", True, "--input")
//no value needed for -p
p = parse_cmd(sys.argv[1:],"-p")
Several of our biotechnology clients have posed these two questions recently:
How can we execute a Python script as a command?
How can we pass input values to a Python script when it is executed as a command?
I have included a Python script below which I believe answers both questions. Let's assume the following Python script is saved in the file test.py:
#
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
#
# file name: test.py
#
# input values: data - location of data to be processed
# date - date data were delivered for processing
# study - name of the study where data originated
# logs - location where log files should be written
#
# macOS usage:
#
# python3 test.py "/Users/lawrence/data" "20220518" "XYZ123" "/Users/lawrence/logs"
#
# Windows usage:
#
# python test.py "D:\data" "20220518" "XYZ123" "D:\logs"
#
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
#
# import needed modules...
#
import sys
import datetime
def main(argv):
#
# print message that process is starting...
#
print("test process starting at", datetime.datetime.now().strftime("%Y%m%d %H:%M"))
#
# set local values from input values...
#
data = sys.argv[1]
date = sys.argv[2]
study = sys.argv[3]
logs = sys.argv[4]
#
# print input arguments...
#
print("data value is", data)
print("date value is", date)
print("study value is", study)
print("logs value is", logs)
#
# print message that process is ending...
#
print("test process ending at", datetime.datetime.now().strftime("%Y%m%d %H:%M"))
#
# call main() to begin processing...
#
if __name__ == '__main__':
main(sys.argv)
The script can be executed on a macOS computer in a Terminal shell as shown below and the results will be printed to standard output (be sure the current directory includes the test.py file):
$ python3 test.py "/Users/lawrence/data" "20220518" "XYZ123" "/Users/lawrence/logs"
test process starting at 20220518 16:51
data value is /Users/lawrence/data
date value is 20220518
study value is XYZ123
logs value is /Users/lawrence/logs
test process ending at 20220518 16:51
The script can also be executed on a Windows computer in a Command Prompt as shown below and the results will be printed to standard output (be sure the current directory includes the test.py file):
D:\scripts>python test.py "D:\data" "20220518" "XYZ123" "D:\logs"
test process starting at 20220518 17:20
data value is D:\data
date value is 20220518
study value is XYZ123
logs value is D:\logs
test process ending at 20220518 17:20
This script answers both questions posed above and is a good starting point for developing scripts that will be executed as commands with input values.
Reason for the new answer:
Existing answers specify multiple options.
Standard option is to use argparse, a few answers provided examples from the documentation, and one answer suggested the advantage of it. But all fail to explain the answer adequately/clearly to the actual question by OP, at least for newbies.
An example of argparse:
import argparse
def load_config(conf_file):
pass
if __name__ == '__main__':
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
//Specifies one argument from the command line
//You can have any number of arguments like this
parser.add_argument("conf_file", help="configuration file for the application")
args = parser.parse_args()
config = load_config(args.conf_file)
Above program expects a config file as an argument. If you provide it, it will execute happily. If not, it will print the following
usage: test.py [-h] conf_file
test.py: error: the following arguments are required: conf_file
You can have the option to specify if the argument is optional.
You can specify the expected type for the argument using type key
parser.add_argument("age", type=int, help="age of the person")
You can specify default value for the arguments by specifying default key
This document will help you to understand it to an extent.
As my title suggests, I am using sys and argparse to add command line arguments to my code. Sys is being used to add a file path like /sample/test/etc and argparse is being used to add a separate optional functionality in my code. My code works just fine when I use just argparse but when sys comes in the picture is when the following error shows up:
test.py: error: unrecognized arguments: /sample/test/etc
The first few lines of my code I use sys to save the file path into a variable:
import sys
path = sys.argv[1]
Is there anyway I can utilize sys to record a file path while keeping my argparse which is, -r, later in the code?
You do not need to use sys.argv to capture the path, you can handle both arguments with argparse. If you add an argument without a - prefix, it will be treated as a compulsory positional argument:
import argparse
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Description')
parser.add_argument('path', help='Path')
parser.add_argument('-r', '--relative', action='store_true',
help='optional argument')
args = parser.parse_args()
print('path: {:}'.format(args.path))
print('relative: {:}'.format(args.relative))
Usage:
myscript.py [-h] [-r] path
In Python, how can we find out the command line arguments that were provided for a script, and process them?
For some more specific examples, see Implementing a "[command] [action] [parameter]" style command-line interfaces? and How do I format positional argument help using Python's optparse?.
import sys
print("\n".join(sys.argv))
sys.argv is a list that contains all the arguments passed to the script on the command line. sys.argv[0] is the script name.
Basically,
import sys
print(sys.argv[1:])
The canonical solution in the standard library is argparse (docs):
Here is an example:
from argparse import ArgumentParser
parser = ArgumentParser()
parser.add_argument("-f", "--file", dest="filename",
help="write report to FILE", metavar="FILE")
parser.add_argument("-q", "--quiet",
action="store_false", dest="verbose", default=True,
help="don't print status messages to stdout")
args = parser.parse_args()
argparse supports (among other things):
Multiple options in any order.
Short and long options.
Default values.
Generation of a usage help message.
Just going around evangelizing for argparse which is better for these reasons.. essentially:
(copied from the link)
argparse module can handle positional
and optional arguments, while
optparse can handle only optional
arguments
argparse isn’t dogmatic about
what your command line interface
should look like - options like -file
or /file are supported, as are
required options. Optparse refuses to
support these features, preferring
purity over practicality
argparse produces more
informative usage messages, including
command-line usage determined from
your arguments, and help messages for
both positional and optional
arguments. The optparse module
requires you to write your own usage
string, and has no way to display
help for positional arguments.
argparse supports action that
consume a variable number of
command-line args, while optparse
requires that the exact number of
arguments (e.g. 1, 2, or 3) be known
in advance
argparse supports parsers that
dispatch to sub-commands, while
optparse requires setting
allow_interspersed_args and doing the
parser dispatch manually
And my personal favorite:
argparse allows the type and
action parameters to add_argument()
to be specified with simple
callables, while optparse requires
hacking class attributes like
STORE_ACTIONS or CHECK_METHODS to get
proper argument checking
There is also argparse stdlib module (an "impovement" on stdlib's optparse module). Example from the introduction to argparse:
# script.py
import argparse
if __name__ == '__main__':
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
parser.add_argument(
'integers', metavar='int', type=int, choices=range(10),
nargs='+', help='an integer in the range 0..9')
parser.add_argument(
'--sum', dest='accumulate', action='store_const', const=sum,
default=max, help='sum the integers (default: find the max)')
args = parser.parse_args()
print(args.accumulate(args.integers))
Usage:
$ script.py 1 2 3 4
4
$ script.py --sum 1 2 3 4
10
If you need something fast and not very flexible
main.py:
import sys
first_name = sys.argv[1]
last_name = sys.argv[2]
print("Hello " + first_name + " " + last_name)
Then run python main.py James Smith
to produce the following output:
Hello James Smith
The docopt library is really slick. It builds an argument dict from the usage string for your app.
Eg from the docopt readme:
"""Naval Fate.
Usage:
naval_fate.py ship new <name>...
naval_fate.py ship <name> move <x> <y> [--speed=<kn>]
naval_fate.py ship shoot <x> <y>
naval_fate.py mine (set|remove) <x> <y> [--moored | --drifting]
naval_fate.py (-h | --help)
naval_fate.py --version
Options:
-h --help Show this screen.
--version Show version.
--speed=<kn> Speed in knots [default: 10].
--moored Moored (anchored) mine.
--drifting Drifting mine.
"""
from docopt import docopt
if __name__ == '__main__':
arguments = docopt(__doc__, version='Naval Fate 2.0')
print(arguments)
One way to do it is using sys.argv. This will print the script name as the first argument and all the other parameters that you pass to it.
import sys
for arg in sys.argv:
print arg
#set default args as -h , if no args:
if len(sys.argv) == 1: sys.argv[1:] = ["-h"]
I use optparse myself, but really like the direction Simon Willison is taking with his recently introduced optfunc library. It works by:
"introspecting a function
definition (including its arguments
and their default values) and using
that to construct a command line
argument parser."
So, for example, this function definition:
def geocode(s, api_key='', geocoder='google', list_geocoders=False):
is turned into this optparse help text:
Options:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
-l, --list-geocoders
-a API_KEY, --api-key=API_KEY
-g GEOCODER, --geocoder=GEOCODER
I like getopt from stdlib, eg:
try:
opts, args = getopt.getopt(sys.argv[1:], 'h', ['help'])
except getopt.GetoptError, err:
usage(err)
for opt, arg in opts:
if opt in ('-h', '--help'):
usage()
if len(args) != 1:
usage("specify thing...")
Lately I have been wrapping something similiar to this to make things less verbose (eg; making "-h" implicit).
As you can see optparse "The optparse module is deprecated with and will not be developed further; development will continue with the argparse module."
Pocoo's click is more intuitive, requires less boilerplate, and is at least as powerful as argparse.
The only weakness I've encountered so far is that you can't do much customization to help pages, but that usually isn't a requirement and docopt seems like the clear choice when it is.
import argparse
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Process some integers.')
parser.add_argument('integers', metavar='N', type=int, nargs='+',
help='an integer for the accumulator')
parser.add_argument('--sum', dest='accumulate', action='store_const',
const=sum, default=max,
help='sum the integers (default: find the max)')
args = parser.parse_args()
print(args.accumulate(args.integers))
Assuming the Python code above is saved into a file called prog.py
$ python prog.py -h
Ref-link: https://docs.python.org/3.3/library/argparse.html
You may be interested in a little Python module I wrote to make handling of command line arguments even easier (open source and free to use) - Commando
Yet another option is argh. It builds on argparse, and lets you write things like:
import argh
# declaring:
def echo(text):
"Returns given word as is."
return text
def greet(name, greeting='Hello'):
"Greets the user with given name. The greeting is customizable."
return greeting + ', ' + name
# assembling:
parser = argh.ArghParser()
parser.add_commands([echo, greet])
# dispatching:
if __name__ == '__main__':
parser.dispatch()
It will automatically generate help and so on, and you can use decorators to provide extra guidance on how the arg-parsing should work.
I recommend looking at docopt as a simple alternative to these others.
docopt is a new project that works by parsing your --help usage message rather than requiring you to implement everything yourself. You just have to put your usage message in the POSIX format.
Also with python3 you might find convenient to use Extended Iterable Unpacking to handle optional positional arguments without additional dependencies:
try:
_, arg1, arg2, arg3, *_ = sys.argv + [None] * 2
except ValueError:
print("Not enough arguments", file=sys.stderr) # unhandled exception traceback is meaningful enough also
exit(-1)
The above argv unpack makes arg2 and arg3 "optional" - if they are not specified in argv, they will be None, while if the first is not specified, ValueError will be thouwn:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "test.py", line 3, in <module>
_, arg1, arg2, arg3, *_ = sys.argv + [None] * 2
ValueError: not enough values to unpack (expected at least 4, got 3)
My solution is entrypoint2. Example:
from entrypoint2 import entrypoint
#entrypoint
def add(file, quiet=True):
''' This function writes report.
:param file: write report to FILE
:param quiet: don't print status messages to stdout
'''
print file,quiet
help text:
usage: report.py [-h] [-q] [--debug] file
This function writes report.
positional arguments:
file write report to FILE
optional arguments:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
-q, --quiet don't print status messages to stdout
--debug set logging level to DEBUG
import sys
# Command line arguments are stored into sys.argv
# print(sys.argv[1:])
# I used the slice [1:] to print all the elements except the first
# This because the first element of sys.argv is the program name
# So the first argument is sys.argv[1], the second is sys.argv[2] ecc
print("File name: " + sys.argv[0])
print("Arguments:")
for i in sys.argv[1:]:
print(i)
Let's name this file command_line.py and let's run it:
C:\Users\simone> python command_line.py arg1 arg2 arg3 ecc
File name: command_line.py
Arguments:
arg1
arg2
arg3
ecc
Now let's write a simple program, sum.py:
import sys
try:
print(sum(map(float, sys.argv[1:])))
except:
print("An error has occurred")
Result:
C:\Users\simone> python sum.py 10 4 6 3
23
This handles simple switches, value switches with optional alternative flags.
import sys
# [IN] argv - array of args
# [IN] switch - switch to seek
# [IN] val - expecting value
# [IN] alt - switch alternative
# returns value or True if val not expected
def parse_cmd(argv,switch,val=None,alt=None):
for idx, x in enumerate(argv):
if x == switch or x == alt:
if val:
if len(argv) > (idx+1):
if not argv[idx+1].startswith('-'):
return argv[idx+1]
else:
return True
//expecting a value for -i
i = parse_cmd(sys.argv[1:],"-i", True, "--input")
//no value needed for -p
p = parse_cmd(sys.argv[1:],"-p")
Several of our biotechnology clients have posed these two questions recently:
How can we execute a Python script as a command?
How can we pass input values to a Python script when it is executed as a command?
I have included a Python script below which I believe answers both questions. Let's assume the following Python script is saved in the file test.py:
#
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
#
# file name: test.py
#
# input values: data - location of data to be processed
# date - date data were delivered for processing
# study - name of the study where data originated
# logs - location where log files should be written
#
# macOS usage:
#
# python3 test.py "/Users/lawrence/data" "20220518" "XYZ123" "/Users/lawrence/logs"
#
# Windows usage:
#
# python test.py "D:\data" "20220518" "XYZ123" "D:\logs"
#
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
#
# import needed modules...
#
import sys
import datetime
def main(argv):
#
# print message that process is starting...
#
print("test process starting at", datetime.datetime.now().strftime("%Y%m%d %H:%M"))
#
# set local values from input values...
#
data = sys.argv[1]
date = sys.argv[2]
study = sys.argv[3]
logs = sys.argv[4]
#
# print input arguments...
#
print("data value is", data)
print("date value is", date)
print("study value is", study)
print("logs value is", logs)
#
# print message that process is ending...
#
print("test process ending at", datetime.datetime.now().strftime("%Y%m%d %H:%M"))
#
# call main() to begin processing...
#
if __name__ == '__main__':
main(sys.argv)
The script can be executed on a macOS computer in a Terminal shell as shown below and the results will be printed to standard output (be sure the current directory includes the test.py file):
$ python3 test.py "/Users/lawrence/data" "20220518" "XYZ123" "/Users/lawrence/logs"
test process starting at 20220518 16:51
data value is /Users/lawrence/data
date value is 20220518
study value is XYZ123
logs value is /Users/lawrence/logs
test process ending at 20220518 16:51
The script can also be executed on a Windows computer in a Command Prompt as shown below and the results will be printed to standard output (be sure the current directory includes the test.py file):
D:\scripts>python test.py "D:\data" "20220518" "XYZ123" "D:\logs"
test process starting at 20220518 17:20
data value is D:\data
date value is 20220518
study value is XYZ123
logs value is D:\logs
test process ending at 20220518 17:20
This script answers both questions posed above and is a good starting point for developing scripts that will be executed as commands with input values.
Reason for the new answer:
Existing answers specify multiple options.
Standard option is to use argparse, a few answers provided examples from the documentation, and one answer suggested the advantage of it. But all fail to explain the answer adequately/clearly to the actual question by OP, at least for newbies.
An example of argparse:
import argparse
def load_config(conf_file):
pass
if __name__ == '__main__':
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
//Specifies one argument from the command line
//You can have any number of arguments like this
parser.add_argument("conf_file", help="configuration file for the application")
args = parser.parse_args()
config = load_config(args.conf_file)
Above program expects a config file as an argument. If you provide it, it will execute happily. If not, it will print the following
usage: test.py [-h] conf_file
test.py: error: the following arguments are required: conf_file
You can have the option to specify if the argument is optional.
You can specify the expected type for the argument using type key
parser.add_argument("age", type=int, help="age of the person")
You can specify default value for the arguments by specifying default key
This document will help you to understand it to an extent.
I have a Python script with a docstring. When the parsing of the command-line arguments does not succeed, I want to print the docstring for the user's information.
Is there any way to do this?
Minimal example
#!/usr/bin/env python
"""
Usage: script.py
This describes the script.
"""
import sys
if len(sys.argv) < 2:
print("<here comes the docstring>")
The docstring is stored in the module's __doc__ global.
print(__doc__)
By the way, this goes for any module: import sys; print(sys.__doc__). Docstrings of functions and classes are also in their __doc__ attribute.
Argument parsing should always be done with argparse.
You can display the __doc__ string by passing it to the description parameter of Argparse:
#!/usr/bin/env python
"""
This describes the script.
"""
if __name__ == '__main__':
from argparse import ArgumentParser
parser = ArgumentParser(description=__doc__)
# Add your arguments here
parser.add_argument("-f", "--file", dest="myFilenameVariable",
required=True,
help="write report to FILE", metavar="FILE")
args = parser.parse_args()
print(args.myFilenameVariable)
If you call this mysuperscript.py and execute it you get:
$ ./mysuperscript.py --help
usage: mysuperscript.py [-h] -f FILE
This describes the script.
optional arguments:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
-f FILE, --file FILE write report to FILE
Here is an alternative that does not hardcode the script's filename, but instead uses sys.argv[0] to print it. Using %(scriptName)s instead of %s improves readability of the code.
#!/usr/bin/env python
"""
Usage: %(scriptName)s
This describes the script.
"""
import sys
if len(sys.argv) < 2:
print __doc__ % {'scriptName' : sys.argv[0].split("/")[-1]}
sys.exit(0)
This will print the __doc__ string when --help is the only argument.
if __name__=='__main__':
if len(sys.argv)==2 and sys.argv[1]=='--help':
print(__doc__)
Works for both:
./yourscriptname.py --help
python3 yourscriptname.py --help
An enhancement of #MartinThoma's answer so it prints multi-line docstrings inspired by Python argparse: How to insert newline in the help text?.
Argument parsing should always be done with argparse.
You can display the doc string by passing it to the description
parameter of Argparse:
#!/usr/bin/env python
"""
This summarizes the script.
Additional descriptive paragraph(s).
""" # Edited this docstring
if __name__ == '__main__':
from argparse import ArgumentParser, RawTextHelpFormatter # Edited this line
parser = ArgumentParser(description=__doc__
formatter_class=RawTextHelpFormatter) # Added this line
# Add your arguments here
parser.add_argument("-f", "--file", dest="myFilenameVariable",
required=True,
help="write report to FILE", metavar="FILE")
args = parser.parse_args()
print(args.myFilenameVariable)
If you call this mysuperscript.py and execute it you get:
$ ./mysuperscript.py --help
usage: mysuperscript.py [-h] -f FILE
This summarizes the script.
Additional descriptive paragraph(s).
optional arguments:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
-f FILE, --file FILE write report to FILE
Without the addition of the formatter_class the output would not have the line break in the docstring.
In Python, how can we find out the command line arguments that were provided for a script, and process them?
For some more specific examples, see Implementing a "[command] [action] [parameter]" style command-line interfaces? and How do I format positional argument help using Python's optparse?.
import sys
print("\n".join(sys.argv))
sys.argv is a list that contains all the arguments passed to the script on the command line. sys.argv[0] is the script name.
Basically,
import sys
print(sys.argv[1:])
The canonical solution in the standard library is argparse (docs):
Here is an example:
from argparse import ArgumentParser
parser = ArgumentParser()
parser.add_argument("-f", "--file", dest="filename",
help="write report to FILE", metavar="FILE")
parser.add_argument("-q", "--quiet",
action="store_false", dest="verbose", default=True,
help="don't print status messages to stdout")
args = parser.parse_args()
argparse supports (among other things):
Multiple options in any order.
Short and long options.
Default values.
Generation of a usage help message.
Just going around evangelizing for argparse which is better for these reasons.. essentially:
(copied from the link)
argparse module can handle positional
and optional arguments, while
optparse can handle only optional
arguments
argparse isn’t dogmatic about
what your command line interface
should look like - options like -file
or /file are supported, as are
required options. Optparse refuses to
support these features, preferring
purity over practicality
argparse produces more
informative usage messages, including
command-line usage determined from
your arguments, and help messages for
both positional and optional
arguments. The optparse module
requires you to write your own usage
string, and has no way to display
help for positional arguments.
argparse supports action that
consume a variable number of
command-line args, while optparse
requires that the exact number of
arguments (e.g. 1, 2, or 3) be known
in advance
argparse supports parsers that
dispatch to sub-commands, while
optparse requires setting
allow_interspersed_args and doing the
parser dispatch manually
And my personal favorite:
argparse allows the type and
action parameters to add_argument()
to be specified with simple
callables, while optparse requires
hacking class attributes like
STORE_ACTIONS or CHECK_METHODS to get
proper argument checking
There is also argparse stdlib module (an "impovement" on stdlib's optparse module). Example from the introduction to argparse:
# script.py
import argparse
if __name__ == '__main__':
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
parser.add_argument(
'integers', metavar='int', type=int, choices=range(10),
nargs='+', help='an integer in the range 0..9')
parser.add_argument(
'--sum', dest='accumulate', action='store_const', const=sum,
default=max, help='sum the integers (default: find the max)')
args = parser.parse_args()
print(args.accumulate(args.integers))
Usage:
$ script.py 1 2 3 4
4
$ script.py --sum 1 2 3 4
10
If you need something fast and not very flexible
main.py:
import sys
first_name = sys.argv[1]
last_name = sys.argv[2]
print("Hello " + first_name + " " + last_name)
Then run python main.py James Smith
to produce the following output:
Hello James Smith
The docopt library is really slick. It builds an argument dict from the usage string for your app.
Eg from the docopt readme:
"""Naval Fate.
Usage:
naval_fate.py ship new <name>...
naval_fate.py ship <name> move <x> <y> [--speed=<kn>]
naval_fate.py ship shoot <x> <y>
naval_fate.py mine (set|remove) <x> <y> [--moored | --drifting]
naval_fate.py (-h | --help)
naval_fate.py --version
Options:
-h --help Show this screen.
--version Show version.
--speed=<kn> Speed in knots [default: 10].
--moored Moored (anchored) mine.
--drifting Drifting mine.
"""
from docopt import docopt
if __name__ == '__main__':
arguments = docopt(__doc__, version='Naval Fate 2.0')
print(arguments)
One way to do it is using sys.argv. This will print the script name as the first argument and all the other parameters that you pass to it.
import sys
for arg in sys.argv:
print arg
#set default args as -h , if no args:
if len(sys.argv) == 1: sys.argv[1:] = ["-h"]
I use optparse myself, but really like the direction Simon Willison is taking with his recently introduced optfunc library. It works by:
"introspecting a function
definition (including its arguments
and their default values) and using
that to construct a command line
argument parser."
So, for example, this function definition:
def geocode(s, api_key='', geocoder='google', list_geocoders=False):
is turned into this optparse help text:
Options:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
-l, --list-geocoders
-a API_KEY, --api-key=API_KEY
-g GEOCODER, --geocoder=GEOCODER
I like getopt from stdlib, eg:
try:
opts, args = getopt.getopt(sys.argv[1:], 'h', ['help'])
except getopt.GetoptError, err:
usage(err)
for opt, arg in opts:
if opt in ('-h', '--help'):
usage()
if len(args) != 1:
usage("specify thing...")
Lately I have been wrapping something similiar to this to make things less verbose (eg; making "-h" implicit).
As you can see optparse "The optparse module is deprecated with and will not be developed further; development will continue with the argparse module."
Pocoo's click is more intuitive, requires less boilerplate, and is at least as powerful as argparse.
The only weakness I've encountered so far is that you can't do much customization to help pages, but that usually isn't a requirement and docopt seems like the clear choice when it is.
import argparse
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Process some integers.')
parser.add_argument('integers', metavar='N', type=int, nargs='+',
help='an integer for the accumulator')
parser.add_argument('--sum', dest='accumulate', action='store_const',
const=sum, default=max,
help='sum the integers (default: find the max)')
args = parser.parse_args()
print(args.accumulate(args.integers))
Assuming the Python code above is saved into a file called prog.py
$ python prog.py -h
Ref-link: https://docs.python.org/3.3/library/argparse.html
You may be interested in a little Python module I wrote to make handling of command line arguments even easier (open source and free to use) - Commando
Yet another option is argh. It builds on argparse, and lets you write things like:
import argh
# declaring:
def echo(text):
"Returns given word as is."
return text
def greet(name, greeting='Hello'):
"Greets the user with given name. The greeting is customizable."
return greeting + ', ' + name
# assembling:
parser = argh.ArghParser()
parser.add_commands([echo, greet])
# dispatching:
if __name__ == '__main__':
parser.dispatch()
It will automatically generate help and so on, and you can use decorators to provide extra guidance on how the arg-parsing should work.
I recommend looking at docopt as a simple alternative to these others.
docopt is a new project that works by parsing your --help usage message rather than requiring you to implement everything yourself. You just have to put your usage message in the POSIX format.
Also with python3 you might find convenient to use Extended Iterable Unpacking to handle optional positional arguments without additional dependencies:
try:
_, arg1, arg2, arg3, *_ = sys.argv + [None] * 2
except ValueError:
print("Not enough arguments", file=sys.stderr) # unhandled exception traceback is meaningful enough also
exit(-1)
The above argv unpack makes arg2 and arg3 "optional" - if they are not specified in argv, they will be None, while if the first is not specified, ValueError will be thouwn:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "test.py", line 3, in <module>
_, arg1, arg2, arg3, *_ = sys.argv + [None] * 2
ValueError: not enough values to unpack (expected at least 4, got 3)
My solution is entrypoint2. Example:
from entrypoint2 import entrypoint
#entrypoint
def add(file, quiet=True):
''' This function writes report.
:param file: write report to FILE
:param quiet: don't print status messages to stdout
'''
print file,quiet
help text:
usage: report.py [-h] [-q] [--debug] file
This function writes report.
positional arguments:
file write report to FILE
optional arguments:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
-q, --quiet don't print status messages to stdout
--debug set logging level to DEBUG
import sys
# Command line arguments are stored into sys.argv
# print(sys.argv[1:])
# I used the slice [1:] to print all the elements except the first
# This because the first element of sys.argv is the program name
# So the first argument is sys.argv[1], the second is sys.argv[2] ecc
print("File name: " + sys.argv[0])
print("Arguments:")
for i in sys.argv[1:]:
print(i)
Let's name this file command_line.py and let's run it:
C:\Users\simone> python command_line.py arg1 arg2 arg3 ecc
File name: command_line.py
Arguments:
arg1
arg2
arg3
ecc
Now let's write a simple program, sum.py:
import sys
try:
print(sum(map(float, sys.argv[1:])))
except:
print("An error has occurred")
Result:
C:\Users\simone> python sum.py 10 4 6 3
23
This handles simple switches, value switches with optional alternative flags.
import sys
# [IN] argv - array of args
# [IN] switch - switch to seek
# [IN] val - expecting value
# [IN] alt - switch alternative
# returns value or True if val not expected
def parse_cmd(argv,switch,val=None,alt=None):
for idx, x in enumerate(argv):
if x == switch or x == alt:
if val:
if len(argv) > (idx+1):
if not argv[idx+1].startswith('-'):
return argv[idx+1]
else:
return True
//expecting a value for -i
i = parse_cmd(sys.argv[1:],"-i", True, "--input")
//no value needed for -p
p = parse_cmd(sys.argv[1:],"-p")
Several of our biotechnology clients have posed these two questions recently:
How can we execute a Python script as a command?
How can we pass input values to a Python script when it is executed as a command?
I have included a Python script below which I believe answers both questions. Let's assume the following Python script is saved in the file test.py:
#
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
#
# file name: test.py
#
# input values: data - location of data to be processed
# date - date data were delivered for processing
# study - name of the study where data originated
# logs - location where log files should be written
#
# macOS usage:
#
# python3 test.py "/Users/lawrence/data" "20220518" "XYZ123" "/Users/lawrence/logs"
#
# Windows usage:
#
# python test.py "D:\data" "20220518" "XYZ123" "D:\logs"
#
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
#
# import needed modules...
#
import sys
import datetime
def main(argv):
#
# print message that process is starting...
#
print("test process starting at", datetime.datetime.now().strftime("%Y%m%d %H:%M"))
#
# set local values from input values...
#
data = sys.argv[1]
date = sys.argv[2]
study = sys.argv[3]
logs = sys.argv[4]
#
# print input arguments...
#
print("data value is", data)
print("date value is", date)
print("study value is", study)
print("logs value is", logs)
#
# print message that process is ending...
#
print("test process ending at", datetime.datetime.now().strftime("%Y%m%d %H:%M"))
#
# call main() to begin processing...
#
if __name__ == '__main__':
main(sys.argv)
The script can be executed on a macOS computer in a Terminal shell as shown below and the results will be printed to standard output (be sure the current directory includes the test.py file):
$ python3 test.py "/Users/lawrence/data" "20220518" "XYZ123" "/Users/lawrence/logs"
test process starting at 20220518 16:51
data value is /Users/lawrence/data
date value is 20220518
study value is XYZ123
logs value is /Users/lawrence/logs
test process ending at 20220518 16:51
The script can also be executed on a Windows computer in a Command Prompt as shown below and the results will be printed to standard output (be sure the current directory includes the test.py file):
D:\scripts>python test.py "D:\data" "20220518" "XYZ123" "D:\logs"
test process starting at 20220518 17:20
data value is D:\data
date value is 20220518
study value is XYZ123
logs value is D:\logs
test process ending at 20220518 17:20
This script answers both questions posed above and is a good starting point for developing scripts that will be executed as commands with input values.
Reason for the new answer:
Existing answers specify multiple options.
Standard option is to use argparse, a few answers provided examples from the documentation, and one answer suggested the advantage of it. But all fail to explain the answer adequately/clearly to the actual question by OP, at least for newbies.
An example of argparse:
import argparse
def load_config(conf_file):
pass
if __name__ == '__main__':
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
//Specifies one argument from the command line
//You can have any number of arguments like this
parser.add_argument("conf_file", help="configuration file for the application")
args = parser.parse_args()
config = load_config(args.conf_file)
Above program expects a config file as an argument. If you provide it, it will execute happily. If not, it will print the following
usage: test.py [-h] conf_file
test.py: error: the following arguments are required: conf_file
You can have the option to specify if the argument is optional.
You can specify the expected type for the argument using type key
parser.add_argument("age", type=int, help="age of the person")
You can specify default value for the arguments by specifying default key
This document will help you to understand it to an extent.