I have a time series hourly_df, containing some hourly data:
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
hourly_index = pd.date_range(start='2018-01-01', end='2018-01-07', freq='H')
hourly_data = np.random.rand(hourly_index.shape[0])
hourly_df = pd.DataFrame(hourly_data, index=hourly_index)
and I have a DatetimeIndex, containing some dates (as days as I wish), e.g.
daily_index = pd.to_datetime(['2018-01-01', '2018-01-05', '2018-01-06'])
I want to select each row of hourly_df, which date of its index is in daily_index, so in my case all hourly data from 1st, 5th and 6th January. What is the best way to do this?
If I naively use hourly_df.loc[daily_index], I only get the rows at 0:00:00 for each of the three days. What I want is the hourly data for the whole day for each of the days in daily_index.
One possibility to solve this, is to create a filter that takes the date of each element in the index of hourly_df and compares whether of not this date is in daily_index.
day_filter = [hour.date() in daily_index.date for hour in hourly_df.index]
hourly_df[day_filter]
This produces the desired output, but it seems the usage of the filter is avoidable and can be done in an expression similar to hourly_df.loc[daily_index.date].
save the daily_index as a dataframe
merge on index using hourly_df.merge(daily_index, how = 'inner', ...)
Related
I have a 1 minute interval intraday stock data which looks like this:
import yfinance as yf
import pandas as pd
n = yf.download('^nsei', period= '5d', interval= '1m')
I am trying to resample it to '5m' data like this:
n = n.resample('5T').agg(dict(zip(n.columns, ['first', 'max', 'min', 'last', 'last', 'sum'])))
But it tries to resample the datetime information which is not in my data. The market data is only available till 03:30 PM, but when I look at the resampled dataframe I find its tried to resample for entire 24 hrs.
How do I stop the resampling till 03:30PM and move on to the succeeding date?
Right now the dataframe has mostly NaN values due to this. Any suggestions will be welcome.
I am not sure what you are trying to achieve with that agg() function. Assuming 'first' refers to the first quantile and 'last' to the last quantile and you want to calculate some statistics per column, I suggest you do the following:
Get your data:
import yfinance as yf
import pandas as pd
n = yf.download('^nsei', period= '5d', interval= '1m')
Resample your data:
Note: your result is the same as when you resample with n.resample('5T').first() but this means every value in the dataframe
equals the first value from the 5 minute interval consisting of 5
values. A more logical resampling method is to use the mean() or
sum() function as shown below.
If this is data on stock prices it makes more sense to use mean():
resampled_df = n.resample('5T').mean()
To remove resampled hours that are outside of the working stock hours you have 2 options.
Option 1: drop na values:
filtered_df = resampled_df.dropna()
Note: this will not work if you use sum() since the result won't contain missing values but zeros.
Option 2 filter based on start and end hour
Get minimum and maximum time of day where data is available as datetime.time object:
start = n.index.min().time() # 09:15 as datetime.time object
end = n.index.max().time() # 15:29 as datetime.time object
Filter dataframe based on start and end times:
filtered_df = resampled_df.between_time(start, end)
Get the statistics:
statistics = filtered_df.describe()
statistics
Note that describe() will not contain the sum, so in order to add it you could do:
statistics = pd.concat([statistics, filtered_df.agg(['sum'])])
statistics
Output:
The agg() is to apply individual method of operation for each column, I used this so that I can get to see the 'candlestick' formation as it is called in stock technical analysis.
I was able to fix the issue, by dropping the NaN values.
I have a dataframe that conains gps locations of vehicles recieved at various times in a day. For each vehicle, I want to resample hourly data such that I have the median report (according to the time stamp) for each hour of the day. For hours where there are no corresponding rows, I want a blank row.
I am using the following code:
for i,j in enumerate(list(df.id.unique())):
data=df.loc[df.id==j]
data['hour']=data['timestamp'].hour
data_grouped=data.groupby(['imo','hour']).median().reset_index()
data = data_grouped.set_index('hour').reindex(idx).reset_index() #idx is a list of integers from 0 to 23.
Since my dataframe has millions of id's it takes me a lot of time to iterate though all of them. Is there an efficient way of doing this?
Unlike Pandas reindex dates in Groupby, I have multiple rows for each hour, in addition to some hours having no rows at all.
Tested in last version of pandas, convert hour column to categoricals with all possible categories and then aggregate without loop:
df['hour'] = pd.Categorical(df['timestamp'].dt.hour, categories=range(24))
df1 = df.groupby(['id','imo','hour']).median().reset_index()
I am working on a dataset that has some 26 million rows and 13 columns including two datetime columns arr_date and dep_date. I am trying to create a new boolean column to check if there is any US holidays between these dates.
I am using apply function to the entire dataframe but the execution time is too slow. The code has been running for more than 48 hours now on Goolge Cloud Platform (24GB ram, 4 core). Is there a faster way to do this?
The dataset looks like this:
Sample data
The code I am using is -
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from pandas.tseries.holiday import USFederalHolidayCalendar as calendar
df = pd.read_pickle('dataGT70.pkl')
cal = calendar()
def mark_holiday(df):
df.apply(lambda x: True if (len(cal.holidays(start=x['dep_date'], end=x['arr_date']))>0 and x['num_days']<20) else False, axis=1)
return df
df = mark_holiday(df)
This took me about two minutes to run on a sample dataframe of 30m rows with two columns, start_date and end_date.
The idea is to get a sorted list of all holidays occurring on or after the minimum start date, and then to use bisect_left from the bisect module to determine the next holiday occurring on or after each start date. This holiday is then compared to the end date. If it is less than or equal to the end date, then there must be at least one holiday in the date range between the start and end dates (both inclusive).
from bisect import bisect_left
import pandas as pd
from pandas.tseries.holiday import USFederalHolidayCalendar as calendar
# Create sample dataframe of 10k rows with an interval of 1-19 days.
np.random.seed(0)
n = 10000 # Sample size, e.g. 10k rows.
years = np.random.randint(2010, 2019, n)
months = np.random.randint(1, 13, n)
days = np.random.randint(1, 29, n)
df = pd.DataFrame({'start_date': [pd.Timestamp(*x) for x in zip(years, months, days)],
'interval': np.random.randint(1, 20, n)})
df['end_date'] = df['start_date'] + pd.TimedeltaIndex(df['interval'], unit='d')
df = df.drop('interval', axis=1)
# Get a sorted list of holidays since the fist start date.
hols = calendar().holidays(df['start_date'].min())
# Determine if there is a holiday between the start and end dates (both inclusive).
df['holiday_in_range'] = df['end_date'].ge(
df['start_date'].apply(lambda x: bisect_left(hols, x)).map(lambda x: hols[x]))
>>> df.head(6)
start_date end_date holiday_in_range
0 2015-07-14 2015-07-31 False
1 2010-12-18 2010-12-30 True # 2010-12-24
2 2013-04-06 2013-04-16 False
3 2013-09-12 2013-09-24 False
4 2017-10-28 2017-10-31 False
5 2013-12-14 2013-12-29 True # 2013-12-25
So, for a given start_date timestamp (e.g. 2013-12-14), bisect_right(hols, '2013-12-14') would yield 39, and hols[39] results in 2013-12-25, the next holiday falling on or after the 2013-12-14 start date. The next holiday calculated as df['start_date'].apply(lambda x: bisect_left(hols, x)).map(lambda x: hols[x]). This holiday is then compared to the end_date, and holiday_in_range is thus True if the end_date is greater than or equal to this holiday value, otherwise the holiday must fall after this end_date.
Have you already considered using pandas.merge_asof for this?
I could imagine that map and apply with lambda functions cannot be executed that efficiently.
UPDATE: Ah sorry, I just read, that you only need a boolean if there are any holidays inbetween, this makes it much easier. If thats enough you just need to perform steps 1-5 then group the DataFrame that is the result of step5 by start/end date and use count as the aggregate function to have the number of holidays in the ranges. This result you can join to your original dataset similar to step 8 described below. Then fill the rest of the values with fillna(0). Do something like joined_df['includes_holiday']= joined_df['joined_count_column']>0. After that, you can delete the joined_count_column again from your DataFrame, if you like.
If you use pandas_merge_asof you could work through these steps (step 6 and 7 are only necessary if you need to have all the holidays inbetween start and end in your result DataFrame as well, not just the booleans):
Load your holiday records in a DataFrame and index it on the date. The holidays should be one date per line (storing ranges like for christmas from 24th-26th in one row, would make it much more complex).
Create a copy of your dataframe with just the start, end date columns. UPDATE: every start, end date should only occur once in it. E.g. by using groupby.
Use merge_asof with a reasonable tolerance value (if you join over the start of the period, use direction='forward', if you use the end date, use direction='backward' and how='inner'.
As a result you have a merged DataFrame with your start, end columns and the date column from your holiday dataframe. You get only records, for which a holiday was found with the given tolerance, but later you can merge this data back with your original DataFrame. You will probably now have duplicates of your original records.
Then check the joined holiday for your records with indexers by comparing them with the start and end column and remove the holidays, which are not inbetween.
Sort the dataframe you obtained form step 5 (use something like df.sort_values(['start', 'end', 'holiday'], inplace=True). Now you should insert a number column that numbers the holidays between your periods (the ones you obtained after step 5) form 1 to ... (for each period starting from 1). This is necesary to use unstack in the next step to get the holidays in columns.
Add an index on your dataframe based on period start date, period end date and the count column you inserted in step 6. Use df.unstack(level=-1) on the DataFrame you prepared in steps 1-7. What you now have, is a condensed DataFrame with your original periods with the holidays arranged columnwise.
Now you only have to merge this DataFrame back to your original data using original_df.merge(df_from_step7, left_on=['start', 'end'], right_index=True, how='left')
The result of this is a file with your original data containing the date ranges and for each date range the holidays that lie inbetween the period are stored in a separte columns each behind the data. Loosely speaking the numbering in step 6 assigns the holidays to the columns and has the effect, that the holidays are always assigned from right to left to the columns (you wouldn't have a holiday in column 3 if column 1 is empty).
Step 6. is probably also a bit tricky, but you can do that for example by adding a series filled with a range and then fixing it, so the numbering starts by 0 or 1 in each group by using shift or grouping by start, end with aggregate({'idcol':'min') and joining the result back to subtract it from the value assigned by the range-sequence.
In all, I think it sounds more complicated, than it is and it should be performed quite efficient. Especially if your periods are not that large, because then after step 5, your result set should be much smaller than your original dataframe, but even if that is not the case, it should still be quite efficient, since it can use compiled code.
Python newbie here but I have some data that is intra-day financial data, going back to 2012, so it's got the same hours each day(same trading session each day) but just different dates. I want to be able to select certain times out of the data and check the corresponding OHLC data for that period and then do some analysis on it.
So at the moment it's a CSV file, and I'm doing:
import pandas as pd
data = pd.DataFrame.read_csv('data.csv')
date = data['date']
op = data['open']
high = data['high']
low = data['low']
close = data['close']
volume = data['volume']
The thing is that the date column is in the format of "dd/mm/yyyy 00:00:00 "as one string or whatever, so is it possible to still select between a certain time, like between "09:00:00" and "10:00:00"? or do I have to separate that time bit from the date and make it it's own column? If so, how?
So I believe pandas has a between_time() function, but that seems to need a DataFrame, so how can I convert it to a DataFrame, then I should be able to use the between_time function to select between the times I want. Also because there's obviously thousands of days, all with their own "xx:xx:xx" to "xx:xx:xx" I want to pull that same time period I want to look at from each day, not just the first lot of "xx:xx:xx" to "xx:xx:xx" as it makes its way down the data, if that makes sense. Thanks!!
Consider the dataframe df
from pandas_datareader import data
df = data.get_data_yahoo('AAPL', start='2016-08-01', end='2016-08-03')
df = df.asfreq('H').ffill()
option 1
convert index to series then dt.hour.isin
slc = df.index.to_series().dt.hour.isin([9, 10])
df.loc[slc]
option 2
numpy broadcasting
slc = (df.index.hour[:, None] == [9, 10]).any(1)
df.loc[slc]
response to comment
To then get a range within that time slot per day, use resample + agg + np.ptp (peak to peak)
df.loc[slc].resample('D').agg(np.ptp)
I have a file with intraday prices every ten minutes. [0:41] times in a day. Each date is repeated 42 times. The multi-index below should "collapse" the repeated dates into one for all times.
There are 62,035 rows x 3 columns: [date, time, price].
I would like write a function to get the difference of the ten minute prices, restricting differences to each unique date.
In other words, 09:30 is the first time of each day and 16:20 is the last: I cannot overlap differences between days of price from 16:20 - 09:30. The differences should start as 09:40 - 09:30 and end as 16:20 - 16:10 for each unique date in the dataframe.
Here is my attempt. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
def diffSeries(rounded,data):
'''This function accepts a column called rounded from 'data'
The 2nd input 'data' is a dataframe
'''
df=rounded.shift(1)
idf=data.set_index(['date', 'time'])
data['diff']=['000']
for i in range(0,length(rounded)):
for day in idf.index.levels[0]:
for time in idf.index.levels[1]:
if idf.index.levels[1]!=1620:
data['diff']=rounded[i]-df[i]
else:
day+=1
time+=2
data[['date','time','price','II','diff']].to_csv('final.csv')
return data['diff']
Then I call:
data=read_csv('file.csv')
rounded=roundSeries(data['price'],5)
diffSeries(rounded,data)
On the traceback - I get an Assertion Error.
You can use groupby and then apply to achieve what you want:
diffs = data.groupby(lambda idx: idx[0]).apply(lambda row: row - row.shift(1))
For a full example, suppose you create a test data set for 14 Nov to 16 Nov:
import pandas as pd
from numpy.random import randn
from datetime import time
# Create date range with 10 minute intervals, and filter out irrelevant times
times = pd.bdate_range(start=pd.datetime(2012,11,14,0,0,0),end=pd.datetime(2012,11,17,0,0,0), freq='10T')
filtered_times = [x for x in times if x.time() >= time(9,30) and x.time() <= time(16,20)]
prices = randn(len(filtered_times))
# Create MultiIndex and data frame matching the format of your CSV
arrays = [[x.date() for x in filtered_times]
,[x.time() for x in filtered_times]]
tuples = zip(*arrays)
m_index = pd.MultiIndex.from_tuples(tuples, names=['date', 'time'])
data = pd.DataFrame({'prices': prices}, index=m_index)
You should get a DataFrame a bit like this:
prices
date time
2012-11-14 09:30:00 0.696054
09:40:00 -1.263852
09:50:00 0.196662
10:00:00 -0.942375
10:10:00 1.915207
As mentioned above, you can then get the differences by grouping by the first index and then subtracting the previous row for each row:
diffs = data.groupby(lambda idx: idx[0]).apply(lambda row: row - row.shift(1))
Which gives you something like:
prices
date time
2012-11-14 09:30:00 NaN
09:40:00 -1.959906
09:50:00 1.460514
10:00:00 -1.139036
10:10:00 2.857582
Since you are grouping by the date, the function is not applied for 16:20 - 09:30.
You might want to consider using a TimeSeries instead of a DataFrame, because it will give you far greater flexibility with this kind of data. Supposing you have already loaded your DataFrame from the CSV file, you can easily convert it into a TimeSeries and perform a similar function to get the differences:
dt_index = pd.DatetimeIndex([datetime.combine(i[0],i[1]) for i in data.index])
# or dt_index = pd.DatetimeIndex([datetime.combine(i.date,i.time) for i in data.index])
# if you don't have an multi-level index on data yet
ts = pd.Series(data.prices.values, dt_index)
diffs = ts.groupby(lambda idx: idx.date()).apply(lambda row: row - row.shift(1))
However, you would now have access to the built-in time series functions such as resampling. See here for more about time series in pandas.
#MattiJohn's construction gives a filtered list of length 86,772--when run over 1/3/2007-8/30/2012 for 42 times (10 minute intervals). Observe the data cleaning issues.
Here the data of prices coming from the csv is length: 62,034.
Hence, simply importing from the .csv, as follows, is problematic:
filtered_times = [x for x in times if x.time() >= time(9,30) and x.time() <= time(16,20)]
DF=pd.read_csv('MR10min.csv')
prices = DF.price
# I.E. rather than the generic: prices = randn(len(filtered_times)) above.
The fact that the real data falls short of the length it "should be" means there are data cleaning issues. Often we do not have the full times as bdate_time will generate (half days in the market, etc, holidays).
Your solution is elegant. But I am not sure how to overcome the mismatch between the actual data and the a priori, prescribed dataframe.
Your second TimesSeries suggestion seems to still require construction of a datetime index similar to the first one. For example, if I were use the following two lines to get the actual data of interest:
DF=pd.read_csv('MR10min.csv')
data=pd.DF.set_index(['date','time'])
dt_index = pd.DatetimeIndex([datetime.combine(i[0],i[1]) for i in data.index])
It will generate a:
TypeError: combine() argument 1 must be datetime.date, not str
How does one make a bdate_time array completely informed by the actual data available?
Thank you to (#MattiJohn) and to anyone with interest in continuing this discussion.