Develop Reference

Python, how to execute a line of code without it stopping the rest of the code from executing?

first of all, im a beginner.
Want i want to accomplish is that music plays while the script is executing.
What it does right now it plays the music, waits until the music is over and then executes the rest of the code. That is not what i want. Here my Code:
import os
import subprocess
import multiprocessing
import threading
from playsound import playsound
CurrentPath = os.path.dirname(os.path.normpath(__file__))
os.chdir(CurrentPath)
def music():
Music = "Music.mp4"
#subprocess.run(["ffplay", "-nodisp", "-autoexit", "-hide_banner", Music])
playsound("Music.mp4")
def other_things():
print("Hello World")
#musicp = multiprocessing.Process(target=music())
#restp = multiprocessing.Process(target=other_things())
musicp = threading.Thread(target=music())
restp = threading.Thread(target=other_things())
restp.start()
musicp.start()
LIke you can see i even tried multithreading but it still waits until the music is over before it goes to the rest of the code.

Don't call the functions in the target parameter of the Thread function - delete the brackets to reference the function, not its return value
musicp = threading.Thread(target=music) # instead of music()
restp = threading.Thread(target=other_things) # instead of other_things()

How to pause / resume multiprocessing in Python?

So I got an idea to build something like mp3 player. To build that, I used multiprocessing module provided in Python. Here is my code
import multiprocessing
from playsound import playsound
def cp():
playsound('Music.mp3') # play the music
x = multiprocessing.Process(target = cp, daemon = True)
def main():
x.start()
while True and x.is_alive:
u = input("Input: ")
print(u)
if u == "S":
x.terminate()
print("Terminated process")
break
elif u == 'P':
# questioned code
print("Process paused")
elif u == 'R':
# questioned code
print("Process resumed")
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
The idea is, when the program is executed, the program will automatically play the Music.mp3 file. To control the program, the user must input specific keyword into it.
S to stop the music and exit the program
P to pause the music
R to resuming playing the music
For now, I only know how to code the S option. For the others, I don't have any idea how to code it. So my question is: Is there any idea how to complete the P and R options? Or maybe, is there any idea about how to build the program using another method besides using multiprocessing module?
Thanks for the help

How to make my code stopable? (Not killing/interrupting)

I'm asking this question in a more broad spectrum because I'm not facing this specific issue right now, but I'm wondering how to do it in the future.
If I have a long running python script, that is supposed to do something all the time (could be a infine loop, if that helps). The code is started by running python main.py command on a terminal.
The code doesn't have an ending, so there will be no sys.exit().
I don't want to use KeyboardInterrupt and I don't want to kill the task. Because those options are abrupt, and you can't predict precisely at what point you are stoping the code.
Is there a way to 'softly' terminate the code when I eventually decide to fo it? For example using another command, preparing a class or running another script?
What would be the best practice for this?
PS.: Please, bear in mind that I'm a novice coder.
EDIT:
I'm adding some generic code, in order to make my question clearer.
import time,csv
import GenericAPI
class GenericDataCollector:
def __init__(self):
self.generic_api = GenericAPI()
def collect_data(self):
while True: #Maybe this could be a var that is changed from outside of the class?
data = self.generic_api.fetch_data() #Returns a JSON with some data
self.write_on_csv(data)
time.sleep(1)
def write_on_csv(self, data):
with open('file.csv','wt') as f:
writer = csv.writer(f)
writer.writerow(data)
def run():
obj = GenericDataCollector()
obj.collect_data()
if __name__ == "__main__":
run()
In this particular case, the class is collecting data from some generic API (that comes in JSON) and writing it in a csv file, in a infinite loop. How could I code a way (method?) to stop it (when called uppon, so unexpected), without abruptly interrupting (Ctrl+C or killing task).

I would recommend use the signal module. This allows you to handle signal interrupts (SIGINT) and clean up the program before your exit. Take the following code for example:
import signal
running = True
def handle(a, b):
global running
running = False
# catch the SIGINT signal and call handle() when the process
# receives it
signal.signal(signal.SIGINT, handle)
# your code here
while running:
pass
You can still exit with a Ctrl+C, but what you put in the while loop will not be cut off half way.

Based on #Calder White, how about this (not tested):
import signal
import time,csv
import GenericAPI
class GenericDataCollector:
def __init__(self):
self.generic_api = GenericAPI()
self.cont = True
def collect_data(self):
while self.cont:
signal.signal(signal.SIGINT, self.handle)
data = self.generic_api.fetch_data() #Returns a JSON with some data
self.write_on_csv(data)
time.sleep(1)
def handle(self):
self.cont = False
def write_on_csv(self, data):
with open('file.csv','wt') as f:
writer = csv.writer(f)
writer.writerow(data)
def run():
obj = GenericDataCollector()
obj.collect_data()
if __name__ == "__main__":
run()

Running multiple functions at once using multiprocessing

Currently, I am working on a text-based RPG. The idea is to implement a sound track, as well as general sounds for gameplay, along with a gui, eventually. I have figured out how to play sound using a pyaudio. Now, the problem is that I cannot run any other functions while the music is playing. Is there a way around this? I have read threads on multiprocessing; however, they don't seem to be helping much. With out the multiprocessing code, the audio will dominate and Python will not run any other function. With the code, the game will run the game, but no the audio.
#Module Imports
from rooms import user, create
import items
import enemies
import rooms
from music import AudioFile
from multiprocessing import Process
import sys
def game():
global AudioFile
User = user()
c = create()
a = AudioFile("rpg.wav")
while User.is_alive() and User.win == 0:
if __name__=='__main__':
p1 = Process(target = a.play)
p1.start()
p2 = Process(target = c)
p2.start()
p1.join()
p2.join()
game()
Shouldn't this allow a.play() and class c() to run at the same time?
Thanks for any feedback and answers!

Pleae try following code,
while User.is_alive() and User.win == 0:
if __name__=='__main__':
procs = [Process(target = a.play), Process(target = c)]
[p.start() for p in procs]
[p.join() for p in procs]

Different way to implement this threading?

I'm trying out threads in python. I want a spinning cursor to display while another method runs (for 5-10 mins). I've done out some code but am wondering is this how you would do it? i don't like to use globals, so I assume there is a better way?
c = True
def b():
for j in itertools.cycle('/-\|'):
if (c == True):
sys.stdout.write(j)
sys.stdout.flush()
time.sleep(0.1)
sys.stdout.write('\b')
else:
return
def a():
global c
#code does stuff here for 5-10 minutes
#simulate with sleep
time.sleep(2)
c = False
Thread(target = a).start()
Thread(target = b).start()
EDIT:
Another issue now is that when the processing ends the last element of the spinning cursor is still on screen. so something like \ is printed.

You could use events:
http://docs.python.org/2/library/threading.html
I tested this and it works. It also keeps everything in sync. You should avoid changing/reading the same variables in different threads without synchronizing them.
#!/usr/bin/python
from threading import Thread
from threading import Event
import time
import itertools
import sys
def b(event):
for j in itertools.cycle('/-\|'):
if not event.is_set():
sys.stdout.write(j)
sys.stdout.flush()
time.sleep(0.1)
sys.stdout.write('\b')
else:
return
def a(event):
#code does stuff here for 5-10 minutes
#simulate with sleep
time.sleep(2)
event.set()
def main():
c = Event()
Thread(target = a, kwargs = {'event': c}).start()
Thread(target = b, kwargs = {'event': c}).start()
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Related to 'kwargs', from Python docs (URL in the beginning of the post):
class threading.Thread(group=None, target=None, name=None, args=(), kwargs={})
...
kwargs is a dictionary of keyword arguments for the target invocation. Defaults to {}.

You're on the right track mostly, except for the global variable. Normally you'd needed to coordinate access to shared data like that with a lock or semaphore, but in this special case you can take a short-cut and just use whether one of the threads is running or not instead. This is what I mean:
from threading import Thread
from threading import Event
import time
import itertools
import sys
def monitor_thread(watched_thread):
chars = itertools.cycle('/-\|')
while watched_thread.is_alive():
sys.stdout.write(chars.next())
sys.stdout.flush()
time.sleep(0.1)
sys.stdout.write('\b')
def worker_thread():
# code does stuff here - simulated with sleep
time.sleep(2)
if __name__ == "__main__":
watched_thread = Thread(target=worker_thread)
watched_thread.start()
Thread(target=monitor_thread, args=(watched_thread,)).start()

This is not properly synchronized. But I will not try to explain it all to you right now because it's a whole lot of knowledge. Try to read this: http://effbot.org/zone/thread-synchronization.htm
But in your case it's not that bad that things aren't synchronized correctyl. The only thing that could happen, is that the spining bar spins a few ms longer than the background task actually needs.