Python equivalent of Java synchronized - python

In Java, you can make a variable thread safe by just adding the synchronized keyword. Is there anything that can achieve the same results in Python?

You can use with self.lock: and then put your code inside there. See http://theorangeduck.com/page/synchronized-python for more information.

Working code using with self.lock which can take care of exception if occurs:
Inside Manager we are making Manager mehods thread safe :
from threading import RLock
class Manager:
def __init__(self):
self.lock = RLock()
self.hash: dict[str, int] = dict()
def containsToken(self, key) -> bool:
with self.lock:
self.lock.acquire()
return key in self.hash
def addToken(self, token: str):
with self.lock:
token = token.strip()
if token in self.hash:
self.hash[token] = self.hash[token] + 1
else:
self.hash[token] = 1
def removeToken(self, token):
with self.lock:
if token not in self.hash:
raise KeyError(f"token : {token} doesn't exits")
self.hash[token] = self.hash[token] - 1
if self.hash[token] == 0:
self.hash.pop(token)
if __name__ == "__main__":
sync = Manager()
sync.addToken("a")
sync.addToken("a")
sync.addToken("a")
sync.addToken("a")
sync.addToken("B")
sync.addToken("B")
sync.addToken("B")
sync.addToken("B")
sync.removeToken("a")
sync.removeToken("a")
sync.removeToken("a")
sync.removeToken("B")
print(sync.hash)
Output:
{'a': 1, 'B': 3}

You can write your own #synchronized decorator.
The example uses a Mutex Lock:
from functools import wraps
from multiprocessing import Lock
def synchronized(member):
"""
#synchronized decorator.
Lock a method for synchronized access only. The lock is stored to
the function or class instance, depending on what is available.
"""
#wraps(member)
def wrapper(*args, **kwargs):
lock = vars(member).get("_synchronized_lock", None)
result = ""
try:
if lock is None:
lock = vars(member).setdefault("_synchronized_lock", Lock())
lock.acquire()
result = member(*args, **kwargs)
lock.release()
except Exception as e:
lock.release()
raise e
return result
return wrapper
Now your are able to decorate a method like this:
class MyClass:
...
#synchronized
def hello_world(self):
print("synced hello world")
And there is also an excellent Blog post about the missing synchronized decorator.

Related

Queue in singleton object

I'm using the singleton design pattern which holds a queue and look like that:
class MySingleton():
__instance = None
__msg_queue = None
MAX_QUEUE_SIZE = 10000
lock = threading.Lock()
#staticmethod
def get_instance():
if not MySingleton.__instance:
MySingleton.lock.acquire()
if not MySingleton.__instance:
MySingleton.__instance = MySingleton()
MySingleton.lock.release()
return MySingleton.__instance
def __init__(self):
self.__msg_queue = queue.Queue(maxsize=self.MAX_QUEUE_SIZE)
def get_msg(self):
return self.__msg_queue.get()
def put_msg(self, msg):
self.__msg_queue.put(msg)
def is_empty(self):
return self.__msg_queue.empty()
And when I try to use the is_empty method at another thread that way:
while True:
if MySingleton.get_instance().is_empty():
continue
else:
# do something
My code stuck. Can someone see the problem?

Threading with Decorator in Python [duplicate]

The function foo below returns a string 'foo'. How can I get the value 'foo' which is returned from the thread's target?
from threading import Thread
def foo(bar):
print('hello {}'.format(bar))
return 'foo'
thread = Thread(target=foo, args=('world!',))
thread.start()
return_value = thread.join()
The "one obvious way to do it", shown above, doesn't work: thread.join() returned None.
One way I've seen is to pass a mutable object, such as a list or a dictionary, to the thread's constructor, along with a an index or other identifier of some sort. The thread can then store its results in its dedicated slot in that object. For example:
def foo(bar, result, index):
print 'hello {0}'.format(bar)
result[index] = "foo"
from threading import Thread
threads = [None] * 10
results = [None] * 10
for i in range(len(threads)):
threads[i] = Thread(target=foo, args=('world!', results, i))
threads[i].start()
# do some other stuff
for i in range(len(threads)):
threads[i].join()
print " ".join(results) # what sound does a metasyntactic locomotive make?
If you really want join() to return the return value of the called function, you can do this with a Thread subclass like the following:
from threading import Thread
def foo(bar):
print 'hello {0}'.format(bar)
return "foo"
class ThreadWithReturnValue(Thread):
def __init__(self, group=None, target=None, name=None,
args=(), kwargs={}, Verbose=None):
Thread.__init__(self, group, target, name, args, kwargs, Verbose)
self._return = None
def run(self):
if self._Thread__target is not None:
self._return = self._Thread__target(*self._Thread__args,
**self._Thread__kwargs)
def join(self):
Thread.join(self)
return self._return
twrv = ThreadWithReturnValue(target=foo, args=('world!',))
twrv.start()
print twrv.join() # prints foo
That gets a little hairy because of some name mangling, and it accesses "private" data structures that are specific to Thread implementation... but it works.
For Python 3:
class ThreadWithReturnValue(Thread):
def __init__(self, group=None, target=None, name=None,
args=(), kwargs={}, Verbose=None):
Thread.__init__(self, group, target, name, args, kwargs)
self._return = None
def run(self):
if self._target is not None:
self._return = self._target(*self._args,
**self._kwargs)
def join(self, *args):
Thread.join(self, *args)
return self._return
FWIW, the multiprocessing module has a nice interface for this using the Pool class. And if you want to stick with threads rather than processes, you can just use the multiprocessing.pool.ThreadPool class as a drop-in replacement.
def foo(bar, baz):
print 'hello {0}'.format(bar)
return 'foo' + baz
from multiprocessing.pool import ThreadPool
pool = ThreadPool(processes=1)
async_result = pool.apply_async(foo, ('world', 'foo')) # tuple of args for foo
# do some other stuff in the main process
return_val = async_result.get() # get the return value from your function.
In Python 3.2+, stdlib concurrent.futures module provides a higher level API to threading, including passing return values or exceptions from a worker thread back to the main thread:
import concurrent.futures
def foo(bar):
print('hello {}'.format(bar))
return 'foo'
with concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor() as executor:
future = executor.submit(foo, 'world!')
return_value = future.result()
print(return_value)
Jake's answer is good, but if you don't want to use a threadpool (you don't know how many threads you'll need, but create them as needed) then a good way to transmit information between threads is the built-in Queue.Queue class, as it offers thread safety.
I created the following decorator to make it act in a similar fashion to the threadpool:
def threaded(f, daemon=False):
import Queue
def wrapped_f(q, *args, **kwargs):
'''this function calls the decorated function and puts the
result in a queue'''
ret = f(*args, **kwargs)
q.put(ret)
def wrap(*args, **kwargs):
'''this is the function returned from the decorator. It fires off
wrapped_f in a new thread and returns the thread object with
the result queue attached'''
q = Queue.Queue()
t = threading.Thread(target=wrapped_f, args=(q,)+args, kwargs=kwargs)
t.daemon = daemon
t.start()
t.result_queue = q
return t
return wrap
Then you just use it as:
#threaded
def long_task(x):
import time
x = x + 5
time.sleep(5)
return x
# does not block, returns Thread object
y = long_task(10)
print y
# this blocks, waiting for the result
result = y.result_queue.get()
print result
The decorated function creates a new thread each time it's called and returns a Thread object that contains the queue that will receive the result.
UPDATE
It's been quite a while since I posted this answer, but it still gets views so I thought I would update it to reflect the way I do this in newer versions of Python:
Python 3.2 added in the concurrent.futures module which provides a high-level interface for parallel tasks. It provides ThreadPoolExecutor and ProcessPoolExecutor, so you can use a thread or process pool with the same api.
One benefit of this api is that submitting a task to an Executor returns a Future object, which will complete with the return value of the callable you submit.
This makes attaching a queue object unnecessary, which simplifies the decorator quite a bit:
_DEFAULT_POOL = ThreadPoolExecutor()
def threadpool(f, executor=None):
#wraps(f)
def wrap(*args, **kwargs):
return (executor or _DEFAULT_POOL).submit(f, *args, **kwargs)
return wrap
This will use a default module threadpool executor if one is not passed in.
The usage is very similar to before:
#threadpool
def long_task(x):
import time
x = x + 5
time.sleep(5)
return x
# does not block, returns Future object
y = long_task(10)
print y
# this blocks, waiting for the result
result = y.result()
print result
If you're using Python 3.4+, one really nice feature of using this method (and Future objects in general) is that the returned future can be wrapped to turn it into an asyncio.Future with asyncio.wrap_future. This makes it work easily with coroutines:
result = await asyncio.wrap_future(long_task(10))
If you don't need access to the underlying concurrent.Future object, you can include the wrap in the decorator:
_DEFAULT_POOL = ThreadPoolExecutor()
def threadpool(f, executor=None):
#wraps(f)
def wrap(*args, **kwargs):
return asyncio.wrap_future((executor or _DEFAULT_POOL).submit(f, *args, **kwargs))
return wrap
Then, whenever you need to push cpu intensive or blocking code off the event loop thread, you can put it in a decorated function:
#threadpool
def some_long_calculation():
...
# this will suspend while the function is executed on a threadpool
result = await some_long_calculation()
Another solution that doesn't require changing your existing code:
import Queue # Python 2.x
#from queue import Queue # Python 3.x
from threading import Thread
def foo(bar):
print 'hello {0}'.format(bar) # Python 2.x
#print('hello {0}'.format(bar)) # Python 3.x
return 'foo'
que = Queue.Queue() # Python 2.x
#que = Queue() # Python 3.x
t = Thread(target=lambda q, arg1: q.put(foo(arg1)), args=(que, 'world!'))
t.start()
t.join()
result = que.get()
print result # Python 2.x
#print(result) # Python 3.x
It can be also easily adjusted to a multi-threaded environment:
import Queue # Python 2.x
#from queue import Queue # Python 3.x
from threading import Thread
def foo(bar):
print 'hello {0}'.format(bar) # Python 2.x
#print('hello {0}'.format(bar)) # Python 3.x
return 'foo'
que = Queue.Queue() # Python 2.x
#que = Queue() # Python 3.x
threads_list = list()
t = Thread(target=lambda q, arg1: q.put(foo(arg1)), args=(que, 'world!'))
t.start()
threads_list.append(t)
# Add more threads here
...
threads_list.append(t2)
...
threads_list.append(t3)
...
# Join all the threads
for t in threads_list:
t.join()
# Check thread's return value
while not que.empty():
result = que.get()
print result # Python 2.x
#print(result) # Python 3.x
UPDATE:
I think there's a significantly simpler and more concise way to save the result of the thread, and in a way that keeps the interface virtually identical to the threading.Thread class (please let me know if there are edge cases - I haven't tested as much as my original post below):
import threading
class ConciseResult(threading.Thread):
def run(self):
self.result = self._target(*self._args, **self._kwargs)
To be robust and avoid potential errors:
import threading
class ConciseRobustResult(threading.Thread):
def run(self):
try:
if self._target is not None:
self.result = self._target(*self._args, **self._kwargs)
finally:
# Avoid a refcycle if the thread is running a function with
# an argument that has a member that points to the thread.
del self._target, self._args, self._kwargs
Short explanation: we override only the run method of threading.Thread, and modify nothing else. This allows us to use everything else the threading.Thread class does for us, without needing to worry about missing potential edge cases such as _private attribute assignments or custom attribute modifications in the way that my original post does.
We can verify that we only modify the run method by looking at the output of help(ConciseResult) and help(ConciseRobustResult). The only method/attribute/descriptor included under Methods defined here: is run, and everything else comes from the inherited threading.Thread base class (see the Methods inherited from threading.Thread: section).
To test either of these implementations using the example code below, substitute ConciseResult or ConciseRobustResult for ThreadWithResult in the main function below.
Original post using a closure function in the init method:
Most answers I've found are long and require being familiar with other modules or advanced python features, and will be rather confusing to someone unless they're already familiar with everything the answer talks about.
Working code for a simplified approach:
import threading
class ThreadWithResult(threading.Thread):
def __init__(self, group=None, target=None, name=None, args=(), kwargs={}, *, daemon=None):
def function():
self.result = target(*args, **kwargs)
super().__init__(group=group, target=function, name=name, daemon=daemon)
Example code:
import time, random
def function_to_thread(n):
count = 0
while count < 3:
print(f'still running thread {n}')
count +=1
time.sleep(3)
result = random.random()
print(f'Return value of thread {n} should be: {result}')
return result
def main():
thread1 = ThreadWithResult(target=function_to_thread, args=(1,))
thread2 = ThreadWithResult(target=function_to_thread, args=(2,))
thread1.start()
thread2.start()
thread1.join()
thread2.join()
print(thread1.result)
print(thread2.result)
main()
Explanation:
I wanted to simplify things significantly, so I created a ThreadWithResult class and had it inherit from threading.Thread. The nested function function in __init__ calls the threaded function we want to save the value of, and saves the result of that nested function as the instance attribute self.result after the thread finishes executing.
Creating an instance of this is identical to creating an instance of threading.Thread. Pass in the function you want to run on a new thread to the target argument and any arguments that your function might need to the args argument and any keyword arguments to the kwargs argument.
e.g.
my_thread = ThreadWithResult(target=my_function, args=(arg1, arg2, arg3))
I think this is significantly easier to understand than the vast majority of answers, and this approach requires no extra imports! I included the time and random module to simulate the behavior of a thread, but they're not required to achieve the functionality asked in the original question.
I know I'm answering this looong after the question was asked, but I hope this can help more people in the future!
EDIT: I created the save-thread-result PyPI package to allow you to access the same code above and reuse it across projects (GitHub code is here). The PyPI package fully extends the threading.Thread class, so you can set any attributes you would set on threading.thread on the ThreadWithResult class as well!
The original answer above goes over the main idea behind this subclass, but for more information, see the more detailed explanation (from the module docstring) here.
Quick usage example:
pip3 install -U save-thread-result # MacOS/Linux
pip install -U save-thread-result # Windows
python3 # MacOS/Linux
python # Windows
from save_thread_result import ThreadWithResult
# As of Release 0.0.3, you can also specify values for
#`group`, `name`, and `daemon` if you want to set those
# values manually.
thread = ThreadWithResult(
target = my_function,
args = (my_function_arg1, my_function_arg2, ...)
kwargs = {my_function_kwarg1: kwarg1_value, my_function_kwarg2: kwarg2_value, ...}
)
thread.start()
thread.join()
if getattr(thread, 'result', None):
print(thread.result)
else:
# thread.result attribute not set - something caused
# the thread to terminate BEFORE the thread finished
# executing the function passed in through the
# `target` argument
print('ERROR! Something went wrong while executing this thread, and the function you passed in did NOT complete!!')
# seeing help about the class and information about the threading.Thread super class methods and attributes available:
help(ThreadWithResult)
Parris / kindall's answer join/return answer ported to Python 3:
from threading import Thread
def foo(bar):
print('hello {0}'.format(bar))
return "foo"
class ThreadWithReturnValue(Thread):
def __init__(self, group=None, target=None, name=None, args=(), kwargs=None, *, daemon=None):
Thread.__init__(self, group, target, name, args, kwargs, daemon=daemon)
self._return = None
def run(self):
if self._target is not None:
self._return = self._target(*self._args, **self._kwargs)
def join(self):
Thread.join(self)
return self._return
twrv = ThreadWithReturnValue(target=foo, args=('world!',))
twrv.start()
print(twrv.join()) # prints foo
Note, the Thread class is implemented differently in Python 3.
I stole kindall's answer and cleaned it up just a little bit.
The key part is adding *args and **kwargs to join() in order to handle the timeout
class threadWithReturn(Thread):
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
super(threadWithReturn, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
self._return = None
def run(self):
if self._Thread__target is not None:
self._return = self._Thread__target(*self._Thread__args, **self._Thread__kwargs)
def join(self, *args, **kwargs):
super(threadWithReturn, self).join(*args, **kwargs)
return self._return
UPDATED ANSWER BELOW
This is my most popularly upvoted answer, so I decided to update with code that will run on both py2 and py3.
Additionally, I see many answers to this question that show a lack of comprehension regarding Thread.join(). Some completely fail to handle the timeout arg. But there is also a corner-case that you should be aware of regarding instances when you have (1) a target function that can return None and (2) you also pass the timeout arg to join(). Please see "TEST 4" to understand this corner case.
ThreadWithReturn class that works with py2 and py3:
import sys
from threading import Thread
from builtins import super # https://stackoverflow.com/a/30159479
_thread_target_key, _thread_args_key, _thread_kwargs_key = (
('_target', '_args', '_kwargs')
if sys.version_info >= (3, 0) else
('_Thread__target', '_Thread__args', '_Thread__kwargs')
)
class ThreadWithReturn(Thread):
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
super().__init__(*args, **kwargs)
self._return = None
def run(self):
target = getattr(self, _thread_target_key)
if target is not None:
self._return = target(
*getattr(self, _thread_args_key),
**getattr(self, _thread_kwargs_key)
)
def join(self, *args, **kwargs):
super().join(*args, **kwargs)
return self._return
Some sample tests are shown below:
import time, random
# TEST TARGET FUNCTION
def giveMe(arg, seconds=None):
if not seconds is None:
time.sleep(seconds)
return arg
# TEST 1
my_thread = ThreadWithReturn(target=giveMe, args=('stringy',))
my_thread.start()
returned = my_thread.join()
# (returned == 'stringy')
# TEST 2
my_thread = ThreadWithReturn(target=giveMe, args=(None,))
my_thread.start()
returned = my_thread.join()
# (returned is None)
# TEST 3
my_thread = ThreadWithReturn(target=giveMe, args=('stringy',), kwargs={'seconds': 5})
my_thread.start()
returned = my_thread.join(timeout=2)
# (returned is None) # because join() timed out before giveMe() finished
# TEST 4
my_thread = ThreadWithReturn(target=giveMe, args=(None,), kwargs={'seconds': 5})
my_thread.start()
returned = my_thread.join(timeout=random.randint(1, 10))
Can you identify the corner-case that we may possibly encounter with TEST 4?
The problem is that we expect giveMe() to return None (see TEST 2), but we also expect join() to return None if it times out.
returned is None means either:
(1) that's what giveMe() returned, or
(2) join() timed out
This example is trivial since we know that giveMe() will always return None. But in real-world instance (where the target may legitimately return None or something else) we'd want to explicitly check for what happened.
Below is how to address this corner-case:
# TEST 4
my_thread = ThreadWithReturn(target=giveMe, args=(None,), kwargs={'seconds': 5})
my_thread.start()
returned = my_thread.join(timeout=random.randint(1, 10))
if my_thread.isAlive():
# returned is None because join() timed out
# this also means that giveMe() is still running in the background
pass
# handle this based on your app's logic
else:
# join() is finished, and so is giveMe()
# BUT we could also be in a race condition, so we need to update returned, just in case
returned = my_thread.join()
Using Queue :
import threading, queue
def calc_square(num, out_queue1):
l = []
for x in num:
l.append(x*x)
out_queue1.put(l)
arr = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]
out_queue1=queue.Queue()
t1=threading.Thread(target=calc_square, args=(arr,out_queue1))
t1.start()
t1.join()
print (out_queue1.get())
My solution to the problem is to wrap the function and thread in a class. Does not require using pools,queues, or c type variable passing. It is also non blocking. You check status instead. See example of how to use it at end of code.
import threading
class ThreadWorker():
'''
The basic idea is given a function create an object.
The object can then run the function in a thread.
It provides a wrapper to start it,check its status,and get data out the function.
'''
def __init__(self,func):
self.thread = None
self.data = None
self.func = self.save_data(func)
def save_data(self,func):
'''modify function to save its returned data'''
def new_func(*args, **kwargs):
self.data=func(*args, **kwargs)
return new_func
def start(self,params):
self.data = None
if self.thread is not None:
if self.thread.isAlive():
return 'running' #could raise exception here
#unless thread exists and is alive start or restart it
self.thread = threading.Thread(target=self.func,args=params)
self.thread.start()
return 'started'
def status(self):
if self.thread is None:
return 'not_started'
else:
if self.thread.isAlive():
return 'running'
else:
return 'finished'
def get_results(self):
if self.thread is None:
return 'not_started' #could return exception
else:
if self.thread.isAlive():
return 'running'
else:
return self.data
def add(x,y):
return x +y
add_worker = ThreadWorker(add)
print add_worker.start((1,2,))
print add_worker.status()
print add_worker.get_results()
Taking into consideration #iman comment on #JakeBiesinger answer I have recomposed it to have various number of threads:
from multiprocessing.pool import ThreadPool
def foo(bar, baz):
print 'hello {0}'.format(bar)
return 'foo' + baz
numOfThreads = 3
results = []
pool = ThreadPool(numOfThreads)
for i in range(0, numOfThreads):
results.append(pool.apply_async(foo, ('world', 'foo'))) # tuple of args for foo)
# do some other stuff in the main process
# ...
# ...
results = [r.get() for r in results]
print results
pool.close()
pool.join()
I'm using this wrapper, which comfortably turns any function for running in a Thread - taking care of its return value or exception. It doesn't add Queue overhead.
def threading_func(f):
"""Decorator for running a function in a thread and handling its return
value or exception"""
def start(*args, **kw):
def run():
try:
th.ret = f(*args, **kw)
except:
th.exc = sys.exc_info()
def get(timeout=None):
th.join(timeout)
if th.exc:
raise th.exc[0], th.exc[1], th.exc[2] # py2
##raise th.exc[1] #py3
return th.ret
th = threading.Thread(None, run)
th.exc = None
th.get = get
th.start()
return th
return start
Usage Examples
def f(x):
return 2.5 * x
th = threading_func(f)(4)
print("still running?:", th.is_alive())
print("result:", th.get(timeout=1.0))
#threading_func
def th_mul(a, b):
return a * b
th = th_mul("text", 2.5)
try:
print(th.get())
except TypeError:
print("exception thrown ok.")
Notes on threading module
Comfortable return value & exception handling of a threaded function is a frequent "Pythonic" need and should indeed already be offered by the threading module - possibly directly in the standard Thread class. ThreadPool has way too much overhead for simple tasks - 3 managing threads, lots of bureaucracy. Unfortunately Thread's layout was copied from Java originally - which you see e.g. from the still useless 1st (!) constructor parameter group.
Based of what kindall mentioned, here's the more generic solution that works with Python3.
import threading
class ThreadWithReturnValue(threading.Thread):
def __init__(self, *init_args, **init_kwargs):
threading.Thread.__init__(self, *init_args, **init_kwargs)
self._return = None
def run(self):
self._return = self._target(*self._args, **self._kwargs)
def join(self):
threading.Thread.join(self)
return self._return
Usage
th = ThreadWithReturnValue(target=requests.get, args=('http://www.google.com',))
th.start()
response = th.join()
response.status_code # => 200
join always return None, i think you should subclass Thread to handle return codes and so.
You can define a mutable above the scope of the threaded function, and add the result to that. (I also modified the code to be python3 compatible)
returns = {}
def foo(bar):
print('hello {0}'.format(bar))
returns[bar] = 'foo'
from threading import Thread
t = Thread(target=foo, args=('world!',))
t.start()
t.join()
print(returns)
This returns {'world!': 'foo'}
If you use the function input as the key to your results dict, every unique input is guaranteed to give an entry in the results
Define your target to
1) take an argument q
2) replace any statements return foo with q.put(foo); return
so a function
def func(a):
ans = a * a
return ans
would become
def func(a, q):
ans = a * a
q.put(ans)
return
and then you would proceed as such
from Queue import Queue
from threading import Thread
ans_q = Queue()
arg_tups = [(i, ans_q) for i in xrange(10)]
threads = [Thread(target=func, args=arg_tup) for arg_tup in arg_tups]
_ = [t.start() for t in threads]
_ = [t.join() for t in threads]
results = [q.get() for _ in xrange(len(threads))]
And you can use function decorators/wrappers to make it so you can use your existing functions as target without modifying them, but follow this basic scheme.
GuySoft's idea is great, but I think the object does not necessarily have to inherit from Thread and start() could be removed from interface:
from threading import Thread
import queue
class ThreadWithReturnValue(object):
def __init__(self, target=None, args=(), **kwargs):
self._que = queue.Queue()
self._t = Thread(target=lambda q,arg1,kwargs1: q.put(target(*arg1, **kwargs1)) ,
args=(self._que, args, kwargs), )
self._t.start()
def join(self):
self._t.join()
return self._que.get()
def foo(bar):
print('hello {0}'.format(bar))
return "foo"
twrv = ThreadWithReturnValue(target=foo, args=('world!',))
print(twrv.join()) # prints foo
This is a pretty old question, but I wanted to share a simple solution that has worked for me and helped my dev process.
The methodology behind this answer is the fact that the "new" target function, inner is assigning the result of the original function (passed through the __init__ function) to the result instance attribute of the wrapper through something called closure.
This allows the wrapper class to hold onto the return value for callers to access at anytime.
NOTE: This method doesn't need to use any mangled methods or private methods of the threading.Thread class, although yield functions have not been considered (OP did not mention yield functions).
Enjoy!
from threading import Thread as _Thread
class ThreadWrapper:
def __init__(self, target, *args, **kwargs):
self.result = None
self._target = self._build_threaded_fn(target)
self.thread = _Thread(
target=self._target,
*args,
**kwargs
)
def _build_threaded_fn(self, func):
def inner(*args, **kwargs):
self.result = func(*args, **kwargs)
return inner
Additionally, you can run pytest (assuming you have it installed) with the following code to demonstrate the results:
import time
from commons import ThreadWrapper
def test():
def target():
time.sleep(1)
return 'Hello'
wrapper = ThreadWrapper(target=target)
wrapper.thread.start()
r = wrapper.result
assert r is None
time.sleep(2)
r = wrapper.result
assert r == 'Hello'
As mentioned multiprocessing pool is much slower than basic threading. Using queues as proposeded in some answers here is a very effective alternative. I have use it with dictionaries in order to be able run a lot of small threads and recuperate multiple answers by combining them with dictionaries:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import threading
# use Queue for python2
import queue
import random
LETTERS = 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz'
LETTERS = [ x for x in LETTERS ]
NUMBERS = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
def randoms(k, q):
result = dict()
result['letter'] = random.choice(LETTERS)
result['number'] = random.choice(NUMBERS)
q.put({k: result})
threads = list()
q = queue.Queue()
results = dict()
for name in ('alpha', 'oscar', 'yankee',):
threads.append( threading.Thread(target=randoms, args=(name, q)) )
threads[-1].start()
_ = [ t.join() for t in threads ]
while not q.empty():
results.update(q.get())
print(results)
Here is the version that I created of #Kindall's answer.
This version makes it so that all you have to do is input your command with arguments to create the new thread.
This was made with Python 3.8:
from threading import Thread
from typing import Any
def test(plug, plug2, plug3):
print(f"hello {plug}")
print(f'I am the second plug : {plug2}')
print(plug3)
return 'I am the return Value!'
def test2(msg):
return f'I am from the second test: {msg}'
def test3():
print('hello world')
def NewThread(com, Returning: bool, *arguments) -> Any:
"""
Will create a new thread for a function/command.
:param com: Command to be Executed
:param arguments: Arguments to be sent to Command
:param Returning: True/False Will this command need to return anything
"""
class NewThreadWorker(Thread):
def __init__(self, group = None, target = None, name = None, args = (), kwargs = None, *,
daemon = None):
Thread.__init__(self, group, target, name, args, kwargs, daemon = daemon)
self._return = None
def run(self):
if self._target is not None:
self._return = self._target(*self._args, **self._kwargs)
def join(self):
Thread.join(self)
return self._return
ntw = NewThreadWorker(target = com, args = (*arguments,))
ntw.start()
if Returning:
return ntw.join()
if __name__ == "__main__":
print(NewThread(test, True, 'hi', 'test', test2('hi')))
NewThread(test3, True)
You can use pool.apply_async() of ThreadPool() to return the value from test() as shown below:
from multiprocessing.pool import ThreadPool
def test(num1, num2):
return num1 + num2
pool = ThreadPool(processes=1) # Here
result = pool.apply_async(test, (2, 3)) # Here
print(result.get()) # 5
And, you can also use submit() of concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor() to return the value from test() as shown below:
from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor
def test(num1, num2):
return num1 + num2
with ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=1) as executor:
future = executor.submit(test, 2, 3) # Here
print(future.result()) # 5
And, instead of return, you can use the array result as shown below:
from threading import Thread
def test(num1, num2, r):
r[0] = num1 + num2 # Instead of "return"
result = [None] # Here
thread = Thread(target=test, args=(2, 3, result))
thread.start()
thread.join()
print(result[0]) # 5
And instead of return, you can also use the queue result as shown below:
from threading import Thread
import queue
def test(num1, num2, q):
q.put(num1 + num2) # Instead of "return"
queue = queue.Queue() # Here
thread = Thread(target=test, args=(2, 3, queue))
thread.start()
thread.join()
print(queue.get()) # '5'
The shortest and simplest way I've found to do this is to take advantage of Python classes and their dynamic properties. You can retrieve the current thread from within the context of your spawned thread using threading.current_thread(), and assign the return value to a property.
import threading
def some_target_function():
# Your code here.
threading.current_thread().return_value = "Some return value."
your_thread = threading.Thread(target=some_target_function)
your_thread.start()
your_thread.join()
return_value = your_thread.return_value
print(return_value)
One usual solution is to wrap your function foo with a decorator like
result = queue.Queue()
def task_wrapper(*args):
result.put(target(*args))
Then the whole code may looks like that
result = queue.Queue()
def task_wrapper(*args):
result.put(target(*args))
threads = [threading.Thread(target=task_wrapper, args=args) for args in args_list]
for t in threads:
t.start()
while(True):
if(len(threading.enumerate()) < max_num):
break
for t in threads:
t.join()
return result
Note
One important issue is that the return values may be unorderred.
(In fact, the return value is not necessarily saved to the queue, since you can choose arbitrary thread-safe data structure )
Kindall's answer in Python3
class ThreadWithReturnValue(Thread):
def __init__(self, group=None, target=None, name=None,
args=(), kwargs={}, *, daemon=None):
Thread.__init__(self, group, target, name, args, kwargs, daemon)
self._return = None
def run(self):
try:
if self._target:
self._return = self._target(*self._args, **self._kwargs)
finally:
del self._target, self._args, self._kwargs
def join(self,timeout=None):
Thread.join(self,timeout)
return self._return
I know this thread is old.... but I faced the same problem... If you are willing to use thread.join()
import threading
class test:
def __init__(self):
self.msg=""
def hello(self,bar):
print('hello {}'.format(bar))
self.msg="foo"
def main(self):
thread = threading.Thread(target=self.hello, args=('world!',))
thread.start()
thread.join()
print(self.msg)
g=test()
g.main()
Best way... Define a global variable, then change the variable in the threaded function. Nothing to pass in or retrieve back
from threading import Thread
# global var
radom_global_var = 5
def function():
global random_global_var
random_global_var += 1
domath = Thread(target=function)
domath.start()
domath.join()
print(random_global_var)
# result: 6

Python threading.join() hangs

My problem is as follows:
I have a class that inherits from threading.Thread that I want to be able to stop gracefully. This class also has a Queue it get's its work from.
Since there are quite some classes in my project that should have this behaviour, I've created some superclasses to reduce duplicate code like this:
Thread related behaviour:
class StoppableThread(Thread):
def __init__(self):
Thread.__init__(self)
self._stop = Event()
def stop(self):
self._stop.set()
def stopped(self):
return self._stop.isSet()
Queue related behaviour:
class Queueable():
def __init__(self):
self._queue = Queue()
def append_to_job_queue(self, job):
self._queue.put(job)
Combining the two above and adding queue.join() to the stop() call
class StoppableQueueThread(StoppableThread, Queueable):
def __init__(self):
StoppableThread.__init__(self)
Queueable.__init__(self)
def stop(self):
super(StoppableQueueThread, self).stop()
self._queue.join()
A base class for a datasource:
class DataSource(StoppableThread, ABC):
def __init__(self, data_parser):
StoppableThread.__init__(self)
self.setName("DataSource")
ABC.__init__(self)
self._data_parser = data_parser
def run(self):
while not self.stopped():
record = self._fetch_data()
self._data_parser.append_to_job_queue(record)
#abstractmethod
def _fetch_data(self):
"""implement logic here for obtaining a data piece
should return the fetched data"""
An implementation for a datasource:
class CSVDataSource(DataSource):
def __init__(self, data_parser, file_path):
DataSource.__init__(self, data_parser)
self.file_path = file_path
self.csv_data = Queue()
print('loading csv')
self.load_csv()
print('done loading csv')
def load_csv(self):
"""Loops through csv and adds data to a queue"""
with open(self.file_path, 'r') as f:
self.reader = reader(f)
next(self.reader, None) # skip header
for row in self.reader:
self.csv_data.put(row)
def _fetch_data(self):
"""Returns next item of the queue"""
item = self.csv_data.get()
self.csv_data.task_done()
print(self.csv_data.qsize())
return item
Suppose there is a CSVDataSource instance called ds, if I want to stop the thread I call:
ds.stop()
ds.join()
The ds.join() call however, never returns. I'm not sure why this is, because the run() method does check if the stop event is set.
Any Ideas?
Update
A little more clarity as requested: the applications is build up out of several threads. The RealStrategy thread (below) is the owner of all the other threads and is responsible for starting and terminating them. I haven't set the daemon flag for any of the threads, so they should be non-daemonic by default.
The main thread looks like this:
if __name__ == '__main__':
def exit_handler(signal, frame):
rs.stop_engine()
rs.join()
sys.exit(0)
signal.signal(signal.SIGINT, exit_handler)
rs = RealStrategy()
rs.run_engine()
And here are the rs.run_engine() and rs.stop_engine() methods that are called in main:
class RealStrategy(Thread):
.....
.....
def run_engine(self):
self.on_start()
self._order_handler.start()
self._data_parser.start()
self._data_source.start()
self.start()
def stop_engine(self):
self._data_source.stop()
self._data_parser.stop()
self._order_handler.stop()
self._data_source.join()
self._data_parser.join()
self._order_handler.join()
self.stop()
If you want to use queue.Queue.join, then you must also use queue.Queue.task_done. You can read the linked documentation or see the following copied from information available online:
Queue.task_done()
Indicate that a formerly enqueued task is complete.
Used by queue consumer threads. For each get() used to fetch a task, a
subsequent call to task_done() tells the queue that the processing on
the task is complete.
If a join() is currently blocking, it will resume when all items have
been processed (meaning that a task_done() call was received for every
item that had been put() into the queue).
Raises a ValueError if called more times than there were items placed
in the queue.
Queue.join()
Blocks until all items in the queue have been gotten and processed.
The count of unfinished tasks goes up whenever an item is added to the
queue. The count goes down whenever a consumer thread calls
task_done() to indicate that the item was retrieved and all work on it
is complete. When the count of unfinished tasks drops to zero, join()
unblocks.
To test your problem, an example implementation was created to find out what was going on. It is slightly different from how your program works but demonstrates a method to solving your problem:
#! /usr/bin/env python3
import abc
import csv
import pathlib
import queue
import sys
import threading
import time
def main():
source_path = pathlib.Path(r'C:\path\to\file.csv')
data_source = CSVDataSource(source_path)
data_source.start()
processor = StoppableThread(target=consumer, args=[data_source])
processor.start()
time.sleep(0.1)
data_source.stop()
def consumer(data_source):
while data_source.empty:
time.sleep(0.001)
while not data_source.empty:
task = data_source.get_from_queue(True, 0.1)
print(*task.data, sep=', ', flush=True)
task.done()
class StopThread(StopIteration):
pass
threading.SystemExit = SystemExit, StopThread
class StoppableThread(threading.Thread):
def _bootstrap(self, stop=False):
# noinspection PyProtectedMember
if threading._trace_hook:
raise RuntimeError('cannot run thread with tracing')
def terminate():
nonlocal stop
stop = True
self.__terminate = terminate
# noinspection PyUnusedLocal
def trace(frame, event, arg):
if stop:
raise StopThread
sys.settrace(trace)
super()._bootstrap()
def terminate(self):
try:
self.__terminate()
except AttributeError:
raise RuntimeError('cannot terminate thread '
'before it is started') from None
class Queryable:
def __init__(self, maxsize=1 << 10):
self.__queue = queue.Queue(maxsize)
def add_to_queue(self, item):
self.__queue.put(item)
def get_from_queue(self, block=True, timeout=None):
return self.__queue.get(block, timeout)
#property
def empty(self):
return self.__queue.empty()
#property
def full(self):
return self.__queue.full()
def task_done(self):
self.__queue.task_done()
def join_queue(self):
self.__queue.join()
class StoppableQueryThread(StoppableThread, Queryable):
def __init__(self, target=None, name=None, args=(), kwargs=None,
*, daemon=None, maxsize=1 << 10):
super().__init__(None, target, name, args, kwargs, daemon=daemon)
Queryable.__init__(self, maxsize)
def stop(self):
self.terminate()
self.join_queue()
class DataSource(StoppableQueryThread, abc.ABC):
#abc.abstractmethod
def __init__(self, maxsize=1 << 10):
super().__init__(None, 'DataSource', maxsize=maxsize)
def run(self):
while True:
record = self._fetch_data()
self.add_to_queue(record)
#abc.abstractmethod
def _fetch_data(self):
pass
class CSVDataSource(DataSource):
def __init__(self, source_path):
super().__init__()
self.__data_parser = self.__build_data_parser(source_path)
#staticmethod
def __build_data_parser(source_path):
with source_path.open(newline='') as source:
parser = csv.reader(source)
next(parser, None)
yield from parser
def _fetch_data(self):
try:
return Task(next(self.__data_parser), self.task_done)
except StopIteration:
raise StopThread from None
class Task:
def __init__(self, data, callback):
self.__data = data
self.__callback = callback
#property
def data(self):
return self.__data
def done(self):
self.__callback()
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()

making a generator thread-safe

I am trying to write a thread-safe generator. The generator code is shown below:
def jobs(users):
result = [1 for _ in users]
while(sum(result)>0):
for n,usr in enumerate(users):
if usr.hasQuery():
yield usr
else:
result[n] = 0
I tried the following approach (source):
class ThreadsafeIter(object):
def __init__(self, it):
self.lock = threading.Lock()
self.it = it.__iter__()
def __iter__(self): return self
def __next__(self):
with self.lock:
return next(self.it)
def threadsafe_gen(f):
def g(*a, **kw):
return ThreadsafeIter(f(*a, **kw))
return g
Then decorated jobs() using #threadsafe_gen. This thread-safe generator is used as follows:
genjobs = jobs(users)
from multiprocessing.pool import ThreadPool
pool = ThreadPool(processes=2)
pool.map(worker, genjobs)
where worker is defined as
def worker(usr):
usr.runNextQuery()
The instance usr has a pyODBC connection to a database and a list of queries. When runNextQuery is called, it should run the next query. Using the above code, all the connections remain idle and no query is run. Any idea why?

Whether the method below is thread-safe when implementing Singleton pattern in python?

I have wrote two classes. The first class MySingletonTSafe is thread-safe because I use threading.Lock() to control how to call the method that creates the instance. But I'm not sure whether the second class MySingletonNTSafe is thread-safe. How could the sencond class be proved not thread-safe if it is?
I have found the thread Creating a singleton in python but it couldn't solve my puzzle.
The following is my code:
#!/usr/bin/env python2.7
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
import threading
import Queue
import time
import random
class MySingletonTSafe(object):
"""implement Singleton pattern, thread-safe"""
_instance = None
_lock = threading.Lock()
def __new__(cls):
if MySingletonTSafe._instance is None:
with MySingletonTSafe._lock:
if MySingletonTSafe._instance is None:
MySingletonTSafe._instance = super(MySingletonTSafe, cls).__new__(cls)
return MySingletonTSafe._instance
def __init__(self):
MySingletonTSafe._instance = self
class MySingletonNTSafe(object):
"""implement Singleton pattern, not-thread-safe"""
_instance = None
def __new__(cls):
if MySingletonNTSafe._instance is None:
# time.sleep(random.randint(1, 10))
MySingletonNTSafe._instance = super(MySingletonNTSafe, cls).__new__(cls)
return MySingletonNTSafe._instance
def __init__(self):
MySingletonNTSafe._instance = self
class Test(object):
"""Test whether the class MySingleton works"""
def __init__(self, tnum=3):
self.tnum = tnum
self.queue_st = Queue.Queue()
self.queue_nst = Queue.Queue()
def run(self):
threads_s = [threading.Thread(target=self._run_st) for i in xrange(self.tnum)]
for t in threads_s:
t.start()
t.join()
threads_ns = [threading.Thread(target=self._run_nst) for i in xrange(self.tnum)]
for t in threads_ns:
t.start()
t.join()
def _run_st(self):
# thread-safe case
obj = MySingletonTSafe()
self.queue_st.put(obj)
def _run_nst(self):
# not-thread-safe case
obj = MySingletonNTSafe()
self.queue_nst.put(obj)
if __name__ == '__main__':
test = Test(tnum=10)
test.run()
objs_st = []
while not test.queue_st.empty():
objs_st.append(test.queue_st.get())
last = objs_st.pop()
for obj in objs_st:
if not last == obj:
print('NOT IDENTICAL')
break
else:
print('IDENTICAL')
objs_nst = []
while not test.queue_nst.empty():
objs_nst.append(test.queue_nst.get())
last = objs_nst.pop()
for obj in objs_nst:
if not last == obj:
print('NOT IDENTICAL')
break
else:
print('IDENTICAL')
In this case, you can just come up with an execution where MySingletonNTSafe does the wrong thing in a multi-threaded environment. Here's one:
Thread 1 calls MySingtonNTSafe(). It sees that MySingletonNTSafe._instance is None, then gets interrupted.
Thread 2 calls MySingletonNTSafe(). It sees that MySingletonNTSafe._instance is still None, creates an instance, assigns it to _instance, and returns it.
Thread 1 resumes execution. It creates an instance, assigns it to _instance, and returns it.
At this point, we have two instances, and the class has failed. It is not threadsafe.

Categories

Resources