Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
I would like to give as an input a string and to receive as an output the length of the longest substring with numbers only.
However, first of all, I would like to be a bit more flexible on the "substring with numbers only" definition.
Specifically, I would like to do what I want with substrings which consist let's say at least by 70% of numbers (so not necessarily 100%).
Therefore, if I have this sentence:
sentence = 'I am 14 a data 1,a211 899 scientist 1he3'
then the answer should be 10 coming from the substring 1,a211 899 since this substring has 7 out 10 characters (70%) as digits.
It is not (so) necessary to take into the whitespaces so you can remove them from the beginning if this makes things easier for you.
How can I efficiently do this?
With re_pattern.finditer function and specific regex pattern:
import re
sentence_1 = 'I am 99 a data 1,211 scientist'
pat = re.compile(r'\b\d+(?:[.,]\d+)?') # prepared pattern
max_num_len = max(len(m.group()) for m in pat.finditer(sentence_1))
print(max_num_len) # 5
Additional extended approach for updated condition "longest substring which consist let's say at least by 70% of numbers (so not necessarily 100%).":
sentence = 'I am 14 a data 1,a211 899 scientist 1he3'
num_percent = 70
main_pat = re.compile(r'\b\S*\d+\S*(?:\s*\S*\d+\S*){1,}')
nondigits_pat = re.compile(r'\D+') # pattern to match non-digit characters
max_substr_len = 0
for m in main_pat.finditer(sentence):
val = m.group() # matched substring value
val_len = len(val)
if (len(nondigits_pat.sub('', val)) / val_len * 100 >= num_percent) \
and val_len > max_substr_len:
max_substr_len = val_len
print(max_substr_len) # 10
1) This solution does not works for white space, but is more efficient than the other solution(check below):
s = 'I am 14 a data 1,a211 scientist 1he3'
def check(w):
digits = [d for d in w if d.isdigit()]
return len(digits)/len(w) >= 0.6
l = s.split()
result = ''
for w in l:
if check(w):
if len(w) > len(result):
result = w
print(result)
Output:
1,a211
2) If you want also to consider white spaces, you should check every substring for your condition, which is holding not less than 60% of digits:
s1 = 'I am 14 a data 1,a211 scientist 1he3'
s2 = 'I am 14 a data 1,a211 889 scientist 1he3'
#this function is predicate that check if substring hold more then 60% of digits
def check(w):
digits = [d for d in w if d.isdigit()]
return len(digits)/len(w) >= 0.6
def get_max(s):
result = ''
for i in range(len(s)):
for j in range(i+1, len(s)):
#check if the substring is valid and have larger size
if check(s[i:j]):
if (j-i) > len(result):
result = s[i:j]
return result
print(get_max(s1))
print(get_max(s2))
Output:
1,a211
1,a211 889
The last solution has time complexity of O(n^2), while the first one is O(n), where n is the size of the string.
Inspired by #adnanmuttaleb's code. Instead of checking all slices/substrings, just check the ones that start and end with digits. I believe the time complexity (or at least the number of iterations) is: O(n! / (2 * (n - 2)!)) Where 'n' is the number of digits in the original string. This calculation does not take the complexity of itertools.combinations into account.
def get_longest_substring(string):
from itertools import combinations
def is_valid_substring(substring):
return len([char for char in substring if char.isdigit()]) / len(substring) >= 0.7
digit_indecies = [index for index, char in enumerate(string) if char.isdigit()]
substrings = []
for begin, end in combinations(digit_indecies, 2):
substring = string[begin: end+1]
if is_valid_substring(substring):
substrings.append(substring)
return max(substrings, key=len)
def main():
string = "I am 14 a data 1,a211 899 scientist 1he3"
longest_substring = get_longest_substring(string)
print(longest_substring)
return 0
if __name__ == "__main__":
import sys
sys.exit(main())
Output:
1,a211 899
Related
Project Euler Problem 17:
If the numbers 1 to 5 are written out in words: one, two, three, four,
five, then there are 3 + 3 + 5 + 4 + 4 = 19 letters used in total.
If all the numbers from 1 to 1000 (one thousand) inclusive were
written out in words, how many letters would be used?
NOTE: Do not count spaces or hyphens. For example, 342 (three hundred
and forty-two) contains 23 letters and 115 (one hundred and fifteen)
contains 20 letters. The use of "and" when writing out numbers is in
compliance with British usage.
Whenever I test my code with a randomly generated number, it outputs the correct number of characters if that number were to be written in words. However, when trying to run with the provided testcase my answer is wrong. Answer: 18451
Words = {0: "", 1:"one", 2:"two", 3:"three", 4:"four", 5:"five", 6:"six", 7:"seven", 8:"eight", 9:"nine", 10:"ten", 11:"eleven", 12:"twelve", 13:"thirteen", 14:"fourteen", 15:"fifteen", 16:"sixteen",17:"seventeen", 18:"eighteen", 19:"nineteen", 20:"twenty", 30:"thirty", 40:"forty", 50:"fifty", 60:"sixty", 70:"seventy", 80:"eighty", 90:"ninety", 100:"onehundred", 200:"twohundred", 300:"threehundred", 400:"fourhundred", 500:"fivehundred", 600:"sixhundred", 700:"sevenhundred", 800:"eighthundred", 900:"ninehundred", 1000:"onethousand"}
count = 0
for i in range(1, 1001):
c = 1
arr = []
if(i<=20 or (len(str(i))==2 and i%10==0)):
count += len(Words.get(i))
elif(i%100==0):
count += len(Words.get(i))
else:
while(i!=0):
z = i%10
arr.append(z*c)
i = i//10
c*=10
if(len(arr)==3 and arr[1]==10):
arr[1]=arr[1]+arr[0]
arr[0]=0
for f in arr:
count+=len(Words.get(f))
print(count)
I have debugged your code. You mentioned in your question that 115 (one hundred and fifteen) has 20 letters, but your program counts 17, because you did not consider "and" in your code. If you include every "and", you will get 891 * 3 + 18451 = 21124 which is i believe correct answer. Hope i am not mistaken with math.
This question already has answers here:
How to count consecutive repetitions of a substring in a string?
(4 answers)
Closed 1 year ago.
I'm working on a cs50/pset6/dna project. I'm struggling with finding a way to analyze a sequence of strings, and gather the maximum number of times a certain sequence of characters repeats consecutively. Here is an example:
String: JOKHCNHBVDBVDBVDJHGSBVDBVD
Sequence of characters I should look for: BVD
Result: My function should be able to return 3, because in one point the characters BVD repeat three times consecutively, and even though it repeats again two times, I should look for the time that it repeats the most number of times.
It's a bit lame, but one "brute-force"ish way would be to just check for the presence of the longest substring possible. As soon as a substring is found, break out of the loop:
EDIT - Using a function might be more straight forward:
def get_longest_repeating_pattern(string, pattern):
if not pattern:
return ""
for i in range(len(string)//len(pattern), 0, -1):
current_pattern = pattern * i
if current_pattern in string:
return current_pattern
return ""
string = "JOKHCNHBVDBVDBVDJHGSBVDBVD"
pattern = "BVD"
longest_repeating_pattern = get_longest_repeating_pattern(string, pattern)
print(len(longest_repeating_pattern))
EDIT - explanation:
First, just a simple for-loop that starts at a larger number and goes down to a smaller number. For example, we start at 5 and go down to 0 (but not including 0), with a step size of -1:
>>> for i in range(5, 0, -1):
print(i)
5
4
3
2
1
>>>
if string = "JOKHCNHBVDBVDBVDJHGSBVDBVD", then len(string) would be 26, if pattern = "BVD", then len(pattern) is 3.
Back to my original code:
for i in range(len(string)//len(pattern), 0, -1):
Plugging in the numbers:
for i in range(26//3, 0, -1):
26//3 is an integer division which yields 8, so this becomes:
for i in range(8, 0, -1):
So, it's a for-loop that goes from 8 to 1 (remember, it doesn't go down to 0). i takes on the new value for each iteration, first 8 , then 7, etc.
In Python, you can "multiply" strings, like so:
>>> pattern = "BVD"
>>> pattern * 1
'BVD'
>>> pattern * 2
'BVDBVD'
>>> pattern * 3
'BVDBVDBVD'
>>>
A slightly less bruteforcey solution:
string = 'JOKHCNHBVDBVDBVDJHGSBVDBVD'
key = 'BVD'
len_k = len(key)
max_l = 0
passes = 0
curr_len=0
for i in range(len(string) - len_k + 1): # split the string into substrings of same len as key
if passes > 0: # If key was found in previous sequences, pass ()this way, if key is 'BVD', we will ignore 'VD.' and 'D..'
passes-=1
continue
s = string[i:i+len_k]
if s == key:
curr_len+=1
if curr_len > max_l:
max_l=curr_len
passes = len(key)-1
if prev_s == key:
if curr_len > max_l:
max_l=curr_len
else:
curr_len=0
prev_s = s
print(max_l)
You can do that very easily, elegantly and efficiently using a regex.
We look for all sequences of at least one repetition of your search string. Then, we just need to take the maximum length of these sequences, and divide by the length of the search string.
The regex we use is '(:?<your_sequence>)+': at least one repetition (the +) of the group (<your_sequence>). The :? is just here to make the group non capturing, so that findall returns the whole match, and not just the group.
In case there is no match, we use the default parameter of the max function to return 0.
The code is very short, then:
import re
def max_consecutive_repetitions(search, data):
search_re = re.compile('(?:' + search + ')+')
return max((len(seq) for seq in search_re.findall(data)), default=0) // len(search)
Sample run:
print(max_consecutive_repetitions("BVD", "JOKHCNHBVDBVDBVDJHGSBVDBVD"))
# 3
This is my contribution, I'm not a professional but it worked for me (sorry for bad English)
results = {}
# Loops through all the STRs
for i in range(1, len(reader.fieldnames)):
STR = reader.fieldnames[i]
j = 0
s=0
pre_s = 0
# Loops through all the characters in sequence.txt
while j < (len(sequence) - len(STR)):
# checks if the character we are currently looping is the same than the first STR character
if STR[0] == sequence[j]:
# while the sub-string since j to j - STR lenght is the same than STR, I called this a streak
while sequence[j:(j + len(STR))] == STR:
# j skips to the end of sub-string
j += len(STR)
# streaks counter
s += 1
# if s > 0 means that that the whole STR and sequence coincided at least once
if s > 0:
# save the largest streak as pre_s
if s > pre_s:
pre_s = s
# restarts the streak counter to continue exploring the sequence
s=0
j += 1
# assigns pre_s value to a dictionary with the current STR as key
results[STR] = pre_s
print(results)
Similar to this and many other questions, I have many nested loops (up to 16) of the same structure.
Problem: I have 4-letter alphabet and want to get all possible words of length 16. I need to filter those words. These are DNA sequences (hence 4 letter: ATGC), filtering rules are quite simple:
no XXXX substrings (i.e. can't have same letter in a row more than 3 times, ATGCATGGGGCTA is "bad")
specific GC content, that is number of Gs + number of Cs should be in specific range (40-50%). ATATATATATATA and GCGCGCGCGCGC are bad words
itertools.product will work for that, but data structure here gonna be giant (4^16 = 4*10^9 words)
More importantly, if I do use product, then I still have to go through each element to filter it out. Thus I will have 4 billion steps times 2
My current solution is nested for loops
alphabet = ['a','t','g','c']
for p1 in alphabet:
for p2 in alphabet:
for p3 in alphabet:
...skip...
for p16 in alphabet:
word = p1+p2+p3+...+p16
if word_is_good(word):
good_words.append(word)
counter+=1
Is there good pattern to program that without 16 nested loops? Is there a way to parallelize it efficiently (on multi-core or multiple EC2 nodes)
Also with that pattern i can plug word_is_good? check inside middle of the loops: word that starts badly is bad
...skip...
for p3 in alphabet:
word_3 = p1+p2+p3
if not word_is_good(word_3):
break
for p4 in alphabet:
...skip...
from itertools import product, islice
from time import time
length = 16
def generate(start, alphabet):
"""
A recursive generator function which works like itertools.product
but restricts the alphabet as it goes based on the letters accumulated so far.
"""
if len(start) == length:
yield start
return
gcs = start.count('g') + start.count('c')
if gcs >= length * 0.5:
alphabet = 'at'
# consider the maximum number of Gs and Cs we can have in the end
# if we add one more A/T now
elif length - len(start) - 1 + gcs < length * 0.4:
alphabet = 'gc'
for c in alphabet:
if start.endswith(c * 3):
continue
for string in generate(start + c, alphabet):
yield string
def brute_force():
""" Straightforward method for comparison """
lower = length * 0.4
upper = length * 0.5
for s in product('atgc', repeat=length):
if lower <= s.count('g') + s.count('c') <= upper:
s = ''.join(s)
if not ('aaaa' in s or
'tttt' in s or
'cccc' in s or
'gggg' in s):
yield s
def main():
funcs = [
lambda: generate('', 'atgc'),
brute_force
]
# Testing performance
for func in funcs:
# This needs to be big to get an accurate measure,
# otherwise `brute_force` seems slower than it really is.
# This is probably because of how `itertools.product`
# is implemented.
count = 100000000
start = time()
for _ in islice(func(), count):
pass
print(time() - start)
# Testing correctness
global length
length = 12
for x, y in zip(*[func() for func in funcs]):
assert x == y, (x, y)
main()
On my machine, generate was just a bit faster than brute_force, at about 390 seconds vs 425. This was pretty much as fast as I could make them. I think the full thing would take about 2 hours. Of course, actually processing them will take much longer. The problem is that your constraints don't reduce the full set much.
Here's an example of how to use this in parallel across 16 processes:
from multiprocessing.pool import Pool
alpha = 'atgc'
def generate_worker(start):
start = ''.join(start)
for s in generate(start, alpha):
print(s)
Pool(16).map(generate_worker, product(alpha, repeat=2))
Since you happen to have an alphabet of length 4 (or any "power of 2 integer"), the idea of using and integer ID and bit-wise operations comes to mind instead of checking for consecutive characters in strings. We can assign an integer value to each of the characters in alphabet, for simplicity lets use the index corresponding to each letter.
Example:
6546354310 = 33212321033134 = 'aaaddcbcdcbaddbd'
The following function converts from a base 10 integer to a word using alphabet.
def id_to_word(word_id, word_len):
word = ''
while word_id:
rem = word_id & 0x3 # 2 bits pet letter
word = ALPHABET[rem] + word
word_id >>= 2 # Bit shift to the next letter
return '{2:{0}>{1}}'.format(ALPHABET[0], word_len, word)
Now for a function to check whether a word is "good" based on its integer ID. The following method is of a similar format to id_to_word, except a counter is used to keep track of consecutive characters. The function will return False if the maximum number of identical consecutive characters is exceeded, otherwise it returns True.
def check_word(word_id, max_consecutive):
consecutive = 0
previous = None
while word_id:
rem = word_id & 0x3
if rem != previous:
consecutive = 0
consecutive += 1
if consecutive == max_consecutive + 1:
return False
word_id >>= 2
previous = rem
return True
We're effectively thinking of each word as an integer with base 4. If the Alphabet length was not a "power of 2" value, then modulo % alpha_len and integer division // alpha_len could be used in place of & log2(alpha_len) and >> log2(alpha_len) respectively, although it would take much longer.
Finally, finding all the good words for a given word_len. The advantage of using a range of integer values is that you can reduce the number of for-loops in your code from word_len to 2, albeit the outer loop is very large. This may allow for more friendly multiprocessing of your good word finding task. I have also added in a quick calculation to determine the smallest and largest IDs corresponding to good words, which helps significantly narrow down the search for good words
ALPHABET = ('a', 'b', 'c', 'd')
def find_good_words(word_len):
max_consecutive = 3
alpha_len = len(ALPHABET)
# Determine the words corresponding to the smallest and largest ids
smallest_word = '' # aaabaaabaaabaaab
largest_word = '' # dddcdddcdddcdddc
for i in range(word_len):
if (i + 1) % (max_consecutive + 1):
smallest_word = ALPHABET[0] + smallest_word
largest_word = ALPHABET[-1] + largest_word
else:
smallest_word = ALPHABET[1] + smallest_word
largest_word = ALPHABET[-2] + largest_word
# Determine the integer ids of said words
trans_table = str.maketrans({c: str(i) for i, c in enumerate(ALPHABET)})
smallest_id = int(smallest_word.translate(trans_table), alpha_len) # 1077952576
largest_id = int(largest_word.translate(trans_table), alpha_len) # 3217014720
# Find and store the id's of "good" words
counter = 0
goodies = []
for i in range(smallest_id, largest_id + 1):
if check_word(i, max_consecutive):
goodies.append(i)
counter += 1
In this loop I have specifically stored the word's ID as opposed to the actual word itself incase you are going to use the words for further processing. However, if you are just after the words then change the second to last line to read goodies.append(id_to_word(i, word_len)).
NOTE: I receive a MemoryError when attempting to store all good IDs for word_len >= 14. I suggest writing these IDs/words to a file of some sort!
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
I need to find a way to print a number/letter 1 - 15 total times, I'll have to rinse/repeat for the entire alphabet.
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaa
aaaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaa
aaaa
aaa
aa
a
The most straight up way is to create the string containing 1 - 15 of the same character, and then print it. For this, use the fact that strs can be multiplied by ints like so:
print('a'*15)
Another hint you're probably looking for:
You can use ASCII/Unicode numbers to generate the alphabet like so:
>>> ord('a')
97
>>> ord('z')
122
>>> chr(97)
a
>>> chr(122)
z
so:
>>> print(','.join([chr(_) for _ in range(97,123)]))
a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l,m,n,o,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,x,y,z
Note that we make the end of the range 123 because for range(start, stop [,step]): For a positive step, the contents of a range r are determined by the formula r[i] = start + step*i where i >= 0 and r[i] < stop.
For a negative step, the contents of the range are still determined by the formula r[i] = start + step*i, but the constraints are i >= 0 and r[i] > stop.
So what you can do, putting it together with jmd_dk's answer is something like:
for i in range(97,123):
for j in range(15, 0, -1):
print(chr(i)*j)
Good luck with your homework!
import string
def letters():
alphabet = string.ascii_lowercase
yield from alphabet
for letter in letters():
num = 1
while num <= 15:
print(letter * num)
num += 1
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 3 months ago.
The community reviewed whether to reopen this question 3 months ago and left it closed:
Original close reason(s) were not resolved
Improve this question
What's the best way to count the number of occurrences of a given string, including overlap in Python? This is one way:
def function(string, str_to_search_for):
count = 0
for x in xrange(len(string) - len(str_to_search_for) + 1):
if string[x:x+len(str_to_search_for)] == str_to_search_for:
count += 1
return count
function('1011101111','11')
This method returns 5.
Is there a better way in Python?
Well, this might be faster since it does the comparing in C:
def occurrences(string, sub):
count = start = 0
while True:
start = string.find(sub, start) + 1
if start > 0:
count+=1
else:
return count
>>> import re
>>> text = '1011101111'
>>> len(re.findall('(?=11)', text))
5
If you didn't want to load the whole list of matches into memory, which would never be a problem! you could do this if you really wanted:
>>> sum(1 for _ in re.finditer('(?=11)', text))
5
As a function (re.escape makes sure the substring doesn't interfere with the regex):
def occurrences(text, sub):
return len(re.findall('(?={0})'.format(re.escape(sub)), text))
>>> occurrences(text, '11')
5
You can also try using the new Python regex module, which supports overlapping matches.
import regex as re
def count_overlapping(text, search_for):
return len(re.findall(search_for, text, overlapped=True))
count_overlapping('1011101111','11') # 5
Python's str.count counts non-overlapping substrings:
In [3]: "ababa".count("aba")
Out[3]: 1
Here are a few ways to count overlapping sequences, I'm sure there are many more :)
Look-ahead regular expressions
How to find overlapping matches with a regexp?
In [10]: re.findall("a(?=ba)", "ababa")
Out[10]: ['a', 'a']
Generate all substrings
In [11]: data = "ababa"
In [17]: sum(1 for i in range(len(data)) if data.startswith("aba", i))
Out[17]: 2
def count_substring(string, sub_string):
count = 0
for pos in range(len(string)):
if string[pos:].startswith(sub_string):
count += 1
return count
This could be the easiest way.
A fairly pythonic way would be to use list comprehension here, although it probably wouldn't be the most efficient.
sequence = 'abaaadcaaaa'
substr = 'aa'
counts = sum([
sequence.startswith(substr, i) for i in range(len(sequence))
])
print(counts) # 5
The list would be [False, False, True, False, False, False, True, True, False, False] as it checks all indexes through the string, and because int(True) == 1, sum gives us the total number of matches.
s = "bobobob"
sub = "bob"
ln = len(sub)
print(sum(sub == s[i:i+ln] for i in xrange(len(s)-(ln-1))))
How to find a pattern in another string with overlapping
This function (another solution!) receive a pattern and a text. Returns a list with all the substring located in the and their positions.
def occurrences(pattern, text):
"""
input: search a pattern (regular expression) in a text
returns: a list of substrings and their positions
"""
p = re.compile('(?=({0}))'.format(pattern))
matches = re.finditer(p, text)
return [(match.group(1), match.start()) for match in matches]
print (occurrences('ana', 'banana'))
print (occurrences('.ana', 'Banana-fana fo-fana'))
[('ana', 1), ('ana', 3)]
[('Bana', 0), ('nana', 2), ('fana', 7), ('fana', 15)]
My answer, to the bob question on the course:
s = 'azcbobobegghaklbob'
total = 0
for i in range(len(s)-2):
if s[i:i+3] == 'bob':
total += 1
print 'number of times bob occurs is: ', total
Here is my edX MIT "find bob"* solution (*find number of "bob" occurences in a string named s), which basicaly counts overlapping occurrences of a given substing:
s = 'azcbobobegghakl'
count = 0
while 'bob' in s:
count += 1
s = s[(s.find('bob') + 2):]
print "Number of times bob occurs is: {}".format(count)
If strings are large, you want to use Rabin-Karp, in summary:
a rolling window of substring size, moving over a string
a hash with O(1) overhead for adding and removing (i.e. move by 1 char)
implemented in C or relying on pypy
That can be solved using regex.
import re
def function(string, sub_string):
match = re.findall('(?='+sub_string+')',string)
return len(match)
def count_substring(string, sub_string):
counter = 0
for i in range(len(string)):
if string[i:].startswith(sub_string):
counter = counter + 1
return counter
Above code simply loops throughout the string once and keeps checking if any string is starting with the particular substring that is being counted.
re.subn hasn't been mentioned yet:
>>> import re
>>> re.subn('(?=11)', '', '1011101111')[1]
5
def count_overlaps (string, look_for):
start = 0
matches = 0
while True:
start = string.find (look_for, start)
if start < 0:
break
start += 1
matches += 1
return matches
print count_overlaps ('abrabra', 'abra')
Function that takes as input two strings and counts how many times sub occurs in string, including overlaps. To check whether sub is a substring, I used the in operator.
def count_Occurrences(string, sub):
count=0
for i in range(0, len(string)-len(sub)+1):
if sub in string[i:i+len(sub)]:
count=count+1
print 'Number of times sub occurs in string (including overlaps): ', count
For a duplicated question i've decided to count it 3 by 3 and comparing the string e.g.
counted = 0
for i in range(len(string)):
if string[i*3:(i+1)*3] == 'xox':
counted = counted +1
print counted
An alternative very close to the accepted answer but using while as the if test instead of including if inside the loop:
def countSubstr(string, sub):
count = 0
while sub in string:
count += 1
string = string[string.find(sub) + 1:]
return count;
This avoids while True: and is a little cleaner in my opinion
This is another example of using str.find() but a lot of the answers make it more complicated than necessary:
def occurrences(text, sub):
c, n = 0, text.find(sub)
while n != -1:
c += 1
n = text.find(sub, n+1)
return c
In []:
occurrences('1011101111', '11')
Out[]:
5
Given
sequence = '1011101111'
sub = "11"
Code
In this particular case:
sum(x == tuple(sub) for x in zip(sequence, sequence[1:]))
# 5
More generally, this
windows = zip(*([sequence[i:] for i, _ in enumerate(sequence)][:len(sub)]))
sum(x == tuple(sub) for x in windows)
# 5
or extend to generators:
import itertools as it
iter_ = (sequence[i:] for i, _ in enumerate(sequence))
windows = zip(*(it.islice(iter_, None, len(sub))))
sum(x == tuple(sub) for x in windows)
Alternative
You can use more_itertools.locate:
import more_itertools as mit
len(list(mit.locate(sequence, pred=lambda *args: args == tuple(sub), window_size=len(sub))))
# 5
A simple way to count substring occurrence is to use count():
>>> s = 'bobob'
>>> s.count('bob')
1
You can use replace () to find overlapping strings if you know which part will be overlap:
>>> s = 'bobob'
>>> s.replace('b', 'bb').count('bob')
2
Note that besides being static, there are other limitations:
>>> s = 'aaa'
>>> count('aa') # there must be two occurrences
1
>>> s.replace('a', 'aa').count('aa')
3
def occurance_of_pattern(text, pattern):
text_len , pattern_len = len(text), len(pattern)
return sum(1 for idx in range(text_len - pattern_len + 1) if text[idx: idx+pattern_len] == pattern)
I wanted to see if the number of input of same prefix char is same postfix, e.g., "foo" and """foo"" but fail on """bar"":
from itertools import count, takewhile
from operator import eq
# From https://stackoverflow.com/a/15112059
def count_iter_items(iterable):
"""
Consume an iterable not reading it into memory; return the number of items.
:param iterable: An iterable
:type iterable: ```Iterable```
:return: Number of items in iterable
:rtype: ```int```
"""
counter = count()
deque(zip(iterable, counter), maxlen=0)
return next(counter)
def begin_matches_end(s):
"""
Checks if the begin matches the end of the string
:param s: Input string of length > 0
:type s: ```str```
:return: Whether the beginning matches the end (checks first match chars
:rtype: ```bool```
"""
return (count_iter_items(takewhile(partial(eq, s[0]), s)) ==
count_iter_items(takewhile(partial(eq, s[0]), s[::-1])))
Solution with replaced parts of the string
s = 'lolololol'
t = 0
t += s.count('lol')
s = s.replace('lol', 'lo1')
t += s.count('1ol')
print("Number of times lol occurs is:", t)
Answer is 4.
If you want to count permutation counts of length 5 (adjust if wanted for different lengths):
def MerCount(s):
for i in xrange(len(s)-4):
d[s[i:i+5]] += 1
return d