Related
I have the following problem: in a df, I want to select specific rows and a specific column and in this selection take the first n elements and assign a new value to them. Naively, I thought that the following code should do the job:
import seaborn as sns
import pandas as pd
df = sns.load_dataset('tips')
df.loc[df.day=="Sun", "smoker"].iloc[:4] = "Yes"
Both of the loc and iloc should return a view into the df and the value should be overwritten. However, the dataframe does not change. Why?
I know how to go around it -- creating a new df first just with the loc, then changing the value using iloc and updating back the original df (as below).
But a) I do not think it's optimal, and b) I would like to know why the top solution does not work. Why does it return a copy and not a view of a view?
The alternative solution:
df = sns.load_dataset('tips')
tmp = df.loc[df.day=="Sun", "smoker"]
tmp.iloc[:4] = "Yes"
df.loc[df.day=="Sun", "smoker"] = tmp
Note: I have read the docs, this really great post and this question but they don't explain this. Their concern is the difference between df.loc[mask,"z] and the chained df["z"][mask].
I believe df.loc[].iloc[] is a chained assignment case and pandas doesn't guarantee that you will get a view at the end. From the docs:
Whether a copy or a reference is returned for a setting operation, may depend on the context. This is sometimes called chained assignment and should be avoided.
Since you have a filtering condition in loc, pandas will create a new pd.Series and than will apply an assignment to it. For example the following will work because you'll get the same series as df["smoker"]:
df.loc[:, "smoker"].iloc[:4] = 'Yes'
But you will get SettingWithCopyWarning warning.
You need to rewrite your code so that pandas handles this as a single loc entity.
Another possible workaround:
df.loc[df[df.day=="Sun"].index[:4], "smoker"] = 'Yes'
In your case, you can define the columns to impute
Let's suppose the following dataset
df = pd.DataFrame(data={'State':[1,2,3,4,5,6, 7, 8, 9, 10],
'Sno Center': ["Guntur", "Nellore", "Visakhapatnam", "Biswanath", "Nellore", "Guwahati", "Nellore", "Numaligarh", "Sibsagar", "Munger-Jamalpu"],
'Mar-21': [121, 118.8, 131.6, 123.7, 127.8, 125.9, 114.2, 114.2, 117.7, 117.7],
'Apr-21': [121.1, 118.3, 131.5, 124.5, 128.2, 128.2, 115.4, 115.1, 117.3, 118.3]})
df
State Sno Center Mar-21 Apr-21
0 1 Guntur 121.0 121.1
1 2 Nellore 118.8 118.3
2 3 Visakhapatnam 131.6 131.5
3 4 Biswanath 123.7 124.5
4 5 Nellore 127.8 128.2
5 6 Guwahati 125.9 128.2
6 7 Nellore 114.2 115.4
7 8 Numaligarh 114.2 115.1
8 9 Sibsagar 117.7 117.3
9 10 Munger-Jamalpu 117.7 118.3
So, I would like to change to 0 all dates where Sno Center is equals to Nellore
mask = df["Sno Center"] == "Nellore"
df.loc[mask, ["Mar-21", "Apr-21"]] = 0
The result
df
State Sno Center Mar-21 Apr-21
0 1 Guntur 121.0 121.1
1 2 Nellore 0.0 0.0
2 3 Visakhapatnam 131.6 131.5
3 4 Biswanath 123.7 124.5
4 5 Nellore 0.0 0.0
5 6 Guwahati 125.9 128.2
6 7 Nellore 0.0 0.0
7 8 Numaligarh 114.2 115.1
8 9 Sibsagar 117.7 117.3
9 10 Munger-Jamalpu 117.7 118.3
Other option is to define the columns as a list
COLS = ["Mar-21", "Apr-21"]
df.loc[mask, COLS] = 0
Other options using iloc
COLS = df.iloc[:, 2:4].columns.tolist()
df.loc[mask, COLS] = 0
Or
df.loc[mask, df.iloc[:, 2:4].columns.tolist()] = 0
I have a dataframe df with NaN values and I want to dynamically replace them with the average values of previous and next non-missing values.
In [27]: df
Out[27]:
A B C
0 -0.166919 0.979728 -0.632955
1 -0.297953 -0.912674 -1.365463
2 -0.120211 -0.540679 -0.680481
3 NaN -2.027325 1.533582
4 NaN NaN 0.461821
5 -0.788073 NaN NaN
6 -0.916080 -0.612343 NaN
7 -0.887858 1.033826 NaN
8 1.948430 1.025011 -2.982224
9 0.019698 -0.795876 -0.046431
For example, A[3] is NaN so its value should be (-0.120211-0.788073)/2 = -0.454142. A[4] then should be (-0.454142-0.788073)/2 = -0.621108.
Therefore, the result dataframe should look like:
In [27]: df
Out[27]:
A B C
0 -0.166919 0.979728 -0.632955
1 -0.297953 -0.912674 -1.365463
2 -0.120211 -0.540679 -0.680481
3 -0.454142 -2.027325 1.533582
4 -0.621108 -1.319834 0.461821
5 -0.788073 -0.966089 -1.260202
6 -0.916080 -0.612343 -2.121213
7 -0.887858 1.033826 -2.551718
8 1.948430 1.025011 -2.982224
9 0.019698 -0.795876 -0.046431
Is this a good way to deal with the missing values? I can't simply replace them by the average values of each column because my data is time-series and tends to increase over time. (The initial value may be $0 and final value might be $100000, so the average is $50000 which can be much bigger/smaller than the NaN values).
You can try to understand your logic behind the average that is Geometric progression
s=df.isnull().cumsum()
t1=df[(s==1).shift(-1).fillna(False)].stack().reset_index(level=0,drop=True)
t2=df.lookup(s.idxmax()+1,s.idxmax().index)
df.fillna(t1/(2**s)+t2*(1-0.5**s)*2/2)
Out[212]:
A B C
0 -0.166919 0.979728 -0.632955
1 -0.297953 -0.912674 -1.365463
2 -0.120211 -0.540679 -0.680481
3 -0.454142 -2.027325 1.533582
4 -0.621107 -1.319834 0.461821
5 -0.788073 -0.966089 -1.260201
6 -0.916080 -0.612343 -2.121213
7 -0.887858 1.033826 -2.551718
8 1.948430 1.025011 -2.982224
9 0.019698 -0.795876 -0.046431
Explanation:
1st NaN x/2+y/2=1st
2nd NaN 1st/2+y/2=2nd
3rd NaN 2nd/2+y/2+3rd
Then x/(2**n)+y(1-(1/2)**n)/(1-1/2), this is the key
Got a simular Problem.
The following code worked for me.
def fill_nan_with_mean_from_prev_and_next(df):
NANrows = pd.isnull(df).any(1).nonzero()[0]
null_df = df.isnull()
for row in NANrows :
for colum in range(0,df.shape[1]):
if(null_df.iloc[row][colum]):
df.iloc[row][colum] = (df.iloc[row-1][colum]+df.iloc[row-1][colum])/2
return df
maybe it is helps someone too.
as Ben.T has mentioned above
if you have another group of NaN in the same column
you can consider this lazy solution :)
for column in df:
for ind,row in df[[column]].iterrows():
if ~np.isnan(row[column]):
previous = row[column]
else:
indx = ind + 1
while np.isnan(df.loc[indx,column]):
indx += 1
next = df.loc[indx,column]
previous = df[column][ind] = (previous + next)/2
If i have a dataframe say
df = {'carx' : [merc,rari,merc,hond,fia,merc]
'cary' : [bent,maz,ben,merc,fia,fia]
'milesx' : [0,100,2,22,5,6]
'milesy' : [10,3,18,2,19,2]}
I then would like to plot the value from column milesx if corresponding index of carx has the value 'merc'. The same criteria applies for cary and milesy, else nothing should be plotted. How can i do this?
milesy and milesx should be plotted on the x-axis. The y-axis should just be some continuous values (1,2...).
IIUC, assuming you have following dataframe:
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
%matplotlib inline
# input dictionary
df = {'carx' : ['merc','rari','merc','hond','fia','merc'],
'cary' : ['bent','maz','ben','merc','fia','fia'],
'milesx' : [0,100,2,22,5,6],
'milesy' : [10,3,18,2,19,2]}
# creating input dataframe
dataframe = pd.DataFrame(df)
print(dataframe)
Result:
carx cary milesx milesy
0 merc bent 0 10
1 rari maz 100 3
2 merc ben 2 18
3 hond merc 22 2
4 fia fia 5 19
5 merc fia 6 2
Then, you want to plot values given condition which can be done using function, and using apply:
def my_function(row):
if row['carx'] == 'merc':return row['milesx']
if row['cary'] == 'merc': return row['milesy']
else: return None
# filter those with only 'merc'
filtered = dataframe.apply(lambda row: my_function(row), axis=1)
print(filtered)
Result:
0 0.0
1 NaN
2 2.0
3 2.0
4 NaN
5 6.0
dtype: float64
You do not want to plot when neither of them are which would be NaN, so dropna() may be used:
# plotting
filtered.dropna().plot(kind='bar', legend=None);
I would like to map the function GetPermittedFAR to my dataframe(df) such that I could test if a value in the col zonedist1 == a certain value I could build new cols such as df['FAR_Permitted'] etc.
I have tried various means of map() etc. but haven't gotten this to work. I feel this should be a pretty simple thing to do?
Ideally, I would use a simple list comprehension / lambda as I have many of these test conditional values resulting in col data to create.
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
def GetPermittedFAR():
if df['zonedist1'] == 'R7-3':
df['FAR_Permitted'] = 0.5
df['Building Height Max'] = 35
if df['zonedist1'] == 'R3-2':
df['FAR_Permitted'] = 0.5
df['Building Height Max'] = 35
if df['zonedist1'] == 'R1-1':
df['FAR_Permitted'] = 0.7
df['Building Height Max'] = 100
#etc...if statement for each unique value in 'zonedist'
df = pd.DataFrame({'zonedist1':['R7-3', 'R3-2', 'R1-1',
'R1-2', 'R2', 'R2A', 'R2X',
'R1-1','R7-3','R3-2','R7-3',
'R3-2', 'R1-1', 'R1-2'
]}
df = df.apply(lambda x: GetPermittedFAR(), axis=1)
How about using pd.merge()?
Let df be your dataframe
In [612]: df
Out[612]:
zonedist1
0 R7-3
1 R3-2
2 R1-1
3 R1-2
4 R2
5 R2A
6 R2X
merge be another dataframe with conditions
In [613]: merge
Out[613]:
zonedist1 FAR_Permitted Building Height Max
0 R7-3 0.5 35
1 R3-2 0.5 35
Then, merge df with merge on 'left'
In [614]: df.merge(merge, how='left')
Out[614]:
zonedist1 FAR_Permitted Building Height Max
0 R7-3 0.5 35
1 R3-2 0.5 35
2 R1-1 NaN NaN
3 R1-2 NaN NaN
4 R2 NaN NaN
5 R2A NaN NaN
6 R2X NaN NaN
Later you can replace NaN values.
I have a dataframe, something like:
foo bar qux
0 a 1 3.14
1 b 3 2.72
2 c 2 1.62
3 d 9 1.41
4 e 3 0.58
and I would like to add a 'total' row to the end of dataframe:
foo bar qux
0 a 1 3.14
1 b 3 2.72
2 c 2 1.62
3 d 9 1.41
4 e 3 0.58
5 total 18 9.47
I've tried to use the sum command but I end up with a Series, which although I can convert back to a Dataframe, doesn't maintain the data types:
tot_row = pd.DataFrame(df.sum()).T
tot_row['foo'] = 'tot'
tot_row.dtypes:
foo object
bar object
qux object
I would like to maintain the data types from the original data frame as I need to apply other operations to the total row, something like:
baz = 2*tot_row['qux'] + 3*tot_row['bar']
Update June 2022
pd.append is now deprecated. You could use pd.concat instead but it's probably easier to use df.loc['Total'] = df.sum(numeric_only=True), as Kevin Zhu commented. Or, better still, don't modify the data frame in place and keep your data separate from your summary statistics!
Append a totals row with
df.append(df.sum(numeric_only=True), ignore_index=True)
The conversion is necessary only if you have a column of strings or objects.
It's a bit of a fragile solution so I'd recommend sticking to operations on the dataframe, though. eg.
baz = 2*df['qux'].sum() + 3*df['bar'].sum()
df.loc["Total"] = df.sum()
works for me and I find it easier to remember. Am I missing something?
Probably wasn't possible in earlier versions.
I'd actually like to add the total row only temporarily though.
Adding it permanently is good for display but makes it a hassle in further calculations.
Just found
df.append(df.sum().rename('Total'))
This prints what I want in a Jupyter notebook and appears to leave the df itself untouched.
New Method
To get both row and column total:
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame({'a': [10,20],'b':[100,200],'c': ['a','b']})
df.loc['Column_Total']= df.sum(numeric_only=True, axis=0)
df.loc[:,'Row_Total'] = df.sum(numeric_only=True, axis=1)
print(df)
a b c Row_Total
0 10.0 100.0 a 110.0
1 20.0 200.0 b 220.0
Column_Total 30.0 300.0 NaN 330.0
Use DataFrame.pivot_table with margins=True:
import pandas as pd
data = [('a',1,3.14),('b',3,2.72),('c',2,1.62),('d',9,1.41),('e',3,.58)]
df = pd.DataFrame(data, columns=('foo', 'bar', 'qux'))
Original df:
foo bar qux
0 a 1 3.14
1 b 3 2.72
2 c 2 1.62
3 d 9 1.41
4 e 3 0.58
Since pivot_table requires some sort of grouping (without the index argument, it'll raise a ValueError: No group keys passed!), and your original index is vacuous, we'll use the foo column:
df.pivot_table(index='foo',
margins=True,
margins_name='total', # defaults to 'All'
aggfunc=sum)
Voilà!
bar qux
foo
a 1 3.14
b 3 2.72
c 2 1.62
d 9 1.41
e 3 0.58
total 18 9.47
Alternative way (verified on Pandas 0.18.1):
import numpy as np
total = df.apply(np.sum)
total['foo'] = 'tot'
df.append(pd.DataFrame(total.values, index=total.keys()).T, ignore_index=True)
Result:
foo bar qux
0 a 1 3.14
1 b 3 2.72
2 c 2 1.62
3 d 9 1.41
4 e 3 0.58
5 tot 18 9.47
Building on JMZ answer
df.append(df.sum(numeric_only=True), ignore_index=True)
if you want to continue using your current index you can name the sum series using .rename() as follows:
df.append(df.sum().rename('Total'))
This will add a row at the bottom of the table.
This is the way that I do it, by transposing and using the assign method in combination with a lambda function. It makes it simple for me.
df.T.assign(GrandTotal = lambda x: x.sum(axis=1)).T
Building on answer from Matthias Kauer.
To add row total:
df.loc["Row_Total"] = df.sum()
To add column total,
df.loc[:,"Column_Total"] = df.sum(axis=1)
New method [September 2022]
TL;DR:
Just use
df.style.concat(df.agg(['sum']).style)
for a solution that won't change you dataframe, works even if you have an "sum" in your index, and can be styled!
Explanation
In pandas 1.5.0, a new method named .style.concat() gives you the ability to display several dataframes together. This is a good way to show the total (or any other statistics), because it is not changing the original dataframe, and works even if you have an index named "sum" in your original dataframe.
For example:
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame([[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]], columns=['A', 'B', 'C'])
df.style.concat(df.agg(['sum']).style)
and it will return a formatted table that is visible in jupyter as this:
Styling
with a little longer code, you can even make the last row look different:
df.style.concat(
df.agg(['sum']).style
.set_properties(**{'background-color': 'yellow'})
)
to get:
see other ways to style (such as bold font, or table lines) in the docs
Following helped for me to add a column total and row total to a dataframe.
Assume dft1 is your original dataframe... now add a column total and row total with the following steps.
from io import StringIO
import pandas as pd
#create dataframe string
dfstr = StringIO(u"""
a;b;c
1;1;1
2;2;2
3;3;3
4;4;4
5;5;5
""")
#create dataframe dft1 from string
dft1 = pd.read_csv(dfstr, sep=";")
## add a column total to dft1
dft1['Total'] = dft1.sum(axis=1)
## add a row total to dft1 with the following steps
sum_row = dft1.sum(axis=0) #get sum_row first
dft1_sum=pd.DataFrame(data=sum_row).T #change it to a dataframe
dft1_sum=dft1_sum.reindex(columns=dft1.columns) #line up the col index to dft1
dft1_sum.index = ['row_total'] #change row index to row_total
dft1.append(dft1_sum) # append the row to dft1
Actually all proposed solutions render the original DataFrame unusable for any further analysis and can invalidate following computations, which will be easy to overlook and could lead to false results.
This is because you add a row to the data, which Pandas cannot differentiate from an additional row of data.
Example:
import pandas as pd
data = [1, 5, 6, 8, 9]
df = pd.DataFrame(data)
df
df.describe()
yields
0
0
1
1
5
2
6
3
8
4
9
0
count
5
mean
5.8
std
3.11448
min
1
25%
5
50%
6
75%
8
max
9
After
df.loc['Totals']= df.sum(numeric_only=True, axis=0)
the dataframe looks like this
0
0
1
1
5
2
6
3
8
4
9
Totals
29
This looks nice, but the new row is treated as if it was an additional data item, so df.describe will produce false results:
0
count
6
mean
9.66667
std
9.87252
min
1
25%
5.25
50%
7
75%
8.75
max
29
So: Watch out! and apply this only after doing all other analyses of the data or work on a copy of the DataFrame!
When the "totals" need to be added to an index column:
totals = pd.DataFrame(df.sum(numeric_only=True)).transpose().set_index(pd.Index({"totals"}))
df.append(totals)
e.g.
(Pdb) df
count min bytes max bytes mean bytes std bytes sum bytes
row_0 837200 67412.0 368733992.0 2.518989e+07 5.122836e+07 2.108898e+13
row_1 299000 85380.0 692782132.0 2.845055e+08 2.026823e+08 8.506713e+13
row_2 837200 67412.0 379484173.0 8.706825e+07 1.071484e+08 7.289354e+13
row_3 239200 85392.0 328063972.0 9.870446e+07 1.016989e+08 2.361011e+13
row_4 59800 67292.0 383487021.0 1.841879e+08 1.567605e+08 1.101444e+13
row_5 717600 112309.0 379483824.0 9.687554e+07 1.103574e+08 6.951789e+13
row_6 119600 664144.0 358486985.0 1.611637e+08 1.171889e+08 1.927518e+13
row_7 478400 67300.0 593141462.0 2.824301e+08 1.446283e+08 1.351146e+14
row_8 358800 215002028.0 327493141.0 2.861329e+08 1.545693e+07 1.026645e+14
row_9 358800 202248016.0 321657935.0 2.684668e+08 1.865470e+07 9.632590e+13
(Pdb) totals = pd.DataFrame(df.sum(numeric_only=True)).transpose()
(Pdb) totals
count min bytes max bytes mean bytes std bytes sum bytes
0 4305600.0 418466685.0 4.132815e+09 1.774725e+09 1.025805e+09 6.365722e+14
(Pdb) totals = pd.DataFrame(df.sum(numeric_only=True)).transpose().set_index(pd.Index({"totals"}))
(Pdb) totals
count min bytes max bytes mean bytes std bytes sum bytes
totals 4305600.0 418466685.0 4.132815e+09 1.774725e+09 1.025805e+09 6.365722e+14
(Pdb) df.append(totals)
count min bytes max bytes mean bytes std bytes sum bytes
row_0 837200.0 67412.0 3.687340e+08 2.518989e+07 5.122836e+07 2.108898e+13
row_1 299000.0 85380.0 6.927821e+08 2.845055e+08 2.026823e+08 8.506713e+13
row_2 837200.0 67412.0 3.794842e+08 8.706825e+07 1.071484e+08 7.289354e+13
row_3 239200.0 85392.0 3.280640e+08 9.870446e+07 1.016989e+08 2.361011e+13
row_4 59800.0 67292.0 3.834870e+08 1.841879e+08 1.567605e+08 1.101444e+13
row_5 717600.0 112309.0 3.794838e+08 9.687554e+07 1.103574e+08 6.951789e+13
row_6 119600.0 664144.0 3.584870e+08 1.611637e+08 1.171889e+08 1.927518e+13
row_7 478400.0 67300.0 5.931415e+08 2.824301e+08 1.446283e+08 1.351146e+14
row_8 358800.0 215002028.0 3.274931e+08 2.861329e+08 1.545693e+07 1.026645e+14
row_9 358800.0 202248016.0 3.216579e+08 2.684668e+08 1.865470e+07 9.632590e+13
totals 4305600.0 418466685.0 4.132815e+09 1.774725e+09 1.025805e+09 6.365722e+14
Since i generally want to do this at the very end as to avoid breaking the integrity of the dataframe (right before printing). I created a summary_rows_cols method which returns a printable dataframe:
def summary_rows_cols(df: pd.DataFrame,
column_sum: bool = False,
column_avg: bool = False,
column_median: bool = False,
row_sum: bool = False,
row_avg: bool = False,
row_median: bool = False
) -> pd.DataFrame:
ret = df.copy()
if column_sum: ret.loc['Sum'] = df.sum(numeric_only=True, axis=0)
if column_avg: ret.loc['Avg'] = df.mean(numeric_only=True, axis=0)
if column_median: ret.loc['Median'] = df.median(numeric_only=True, axis=0)
if row_sum: ret.loc[:, 'Sum'] = df.sum(numeric_only=True, axis=1)
if row_median: ret.loc[:, 'Avg'] = df.mean(numeric_only=True, axis=1)
if row_avg: ret.loc[:, 'Median'] = df.median(numeric_only=True, axis=1)
ret.fillna('-', inplace=True)
return ret
This allows me to enter a generic (numeric) df and get a summarized output such as:
a b c Sum Median
0 1 4 7 12 4
1 2 5 8 15 5
2 3 6 9 18 6
Sum 6 15 24 - -
from:
data = {
'a': [1, 2, 3],
'b': [4, 5, 6],
'c': [7, 8, 9]
}
df = pd.DataFrame(data)
printable = summary_rows_cols(df, row_sum=True, column_sum=True, row_median=True)