I have a DataFrame with four columns and want to generate a new DataFrame with only one column containing the maximum value of each row.
Using df2 = df1.max(axis=1) gave me the correct results, but the column is titled 0 and is not operable. Meaning I can not check it's data type or change it's name, which is critical for further processing. Does anyone know what is going on here? Or better yet, has a better way to generate this new DataFrame?
It is Series, for one column DataFrame use Series.to_frame:
df2 = df1.max(axis=1).to_frame('maximum')
Related
Just a random q. If there's a dataframe, df, from the Boston Homes ds, and I'm trying to do EDA on a few of the columns, set to a variable feature_cols, which I could use afterwards to check for na, how would one go about this? I have the following, which is throwing an error:
This is what I was hoping to try to do after the above:
Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
There are two problems in your pictures. First is a keyError, because if you want to access subset of columns of a dataframe, you need to pass the names of the columns in a list not a tuple, so the first line should be
feature_cols = df[['RM','ZN','B']]
However, this will return a dataframe with three columns. What you want to use in the for loop can not work with pandas. We usually iterate over rows, not columns, of a dataframe, you can use the one line:
df.isna().sum()
This will print all names of columns of the dataframe along with the count of the number of missing values in each column. Of course, if you want to check only a subset of columns, you can. replace df buy df[list_of_columns_names].
You need to store the names of the columns only in an array, to access multiple columns, for example
feature_cols = ['RM','ZN','B']
now accessing it as
x = df[feature_cols]
Now to iterate on columns of df, you can use
for column in df[feature_cols]:
print(df[column]) # or anything
As per your updated comment,. if your end goal is to see null counts only, you can achieve without looping., e.g
df[feature_cols].info(verbose=True,null_count=True)
I need to create a new column in my df that holds the mean of another existing column, but I need it to take into account each individual location over time rather then the mean of the all the values in the existing column.
Based on the sample dataset below, what I am looking for is a new column that contains the Mean for each Site, not the mean of all the values independent of Site.
Sample Dataset
Use groupby and agg mean of that columns:
df = df.merge(df.groupby('Site',as_index=False).agg({'TIME_HOUR':'mean'})[['Site','TIME_HOUR']],on='Site',how='left')
Use groupby:
df.groupby('Site')['TIME_HOUR'].mean().reset_index()
And assign to a column
I am appending different dataframes to make one set. Occasionally, some values have the same index, so it stores the value as a series. Is there a quick way within Pandas to just overwrite the value instead of storing all the values as a series?
You weren't very clear guy. If you want to resolve the duplicated indexes problem, probably the pd.Dataframe.reset_index() method will be enough. But, if you have duplicate rows when you concat the Dataframes, just use the pd.DataFrame.drop_duplicates() method. Else, share a bit of your code with or be clearer.
I'm not sure that the code below is what you're searching.
we say two dataframes, one columns, the same index and different values. and you wanna overwrite the value in one dataframe with the other. you can do it with a simple loop with iloc indexer.
import pandas as pd
df_1 = pd.DataFrame({'col_1':['a','b','c','d']})
df_2 = pd.DataFrame({'col_1':['q','w','e','r']})
rows = df_1.shape[0]
for idx in range(rows):
df_1['col_1'].iloc[idx] = df_2['col_2'].iloc[idx]
Then, you check the df_1. you should get that:
df_1
col_1
0 q
1 w
2 e
3 r
Whatever the response is what you want, let me know so I can help you.
I have the following dataset and reading it from csv file.
x =[1,2,3,4,5]
with the pandas i can access the array
df_train = pd.read_csv("train.csv")
x = df_train["x"]
And
x = df_train[["x"]]
I could wonder since both producing the same result the former one could make sense but later one not. PLEASE, COULD YOU explain the difference and use?
In pandas, you can slice your data frame in different ways. On a high level, you can choose to select a single column out of a data frame, or many columns.
When you select many columns, you have to slice using a list, and the return is a pandas DataFrame. For example
df[['col1', 'col2', 'col3']] # returns a data frame
When you select only one column, you can pass only the column name, and the return is just a pandas Series
df['col1'] # returns a series
When you do df[['col1']], you return a DataFrame with only one column. In other words, it's like your telling pandas "give me all the columns from the following list:" and just give it a list with one column on it. It will filter your df, returning all columns in your list (in this case, a data frame with only 1 column)
If you want more details on the difference between a Series and a one-column DataFrame, check this thread with very good answers
I have two columns in a data frame that I want to merge together. The attached image shows the columns:
Image of the two columns I want to merge
I want the "precio_uf_y" column to take precedent over the "precio_uf_x" column a new column, but if there is a NaN value in the "precio_uf_y" column I want the value in the "precio_uf_x" column to go to the new column. My ideal new merged column would look like this:
Desired new column
I have tried different merge functions, and taking min and max with numpy, but maybe there is a way to write a function with these parameters?
Thank you in advance for any help.
You can use df.apply.
def get_new_val(x):
if np.isnan(x.precio_uf_y):
return x.precio_uf_x
else:
return x.precio_uf_y
df["new_precio_uf"] = df.apply(get_new_val, axis=1)