Continue from the previous question, write a function called get_sum(tuple_list) which accepts a list of tuple objects and returns a dictionary containing the sum of values of all the strings that appear in the list. For example, if we have the following data (a list of tuple objects):
tuple_list = [('a',5), ('a',5), ('b',6), ('b',4), ('b',3), ('b',7)]
then the dictionary should contain the following:
{'a': 10, 'b': 20}
My problem is how to distinguish a b value when sum them together
Test
tuple_list = [('a',5), ('a',5), ('b',6), ('b',4), ('b',3), ('b',7)]
sum_dict = get_sum(tuple_list)
for key in sorted(sum_dict.keys()):
print("{}: {}".format(key, sum_dict[key]))
Result
a: 10
b: 20
I would suggest to use defauldict. You can use a normal dict but it will take some more if statements.
from collections import defaultdict
d = defaultdict(int)
tuple_list = [('a',5), ('a',5), ('b',6), ('b',4), ('b',3), ('b',7)]
for a,b in tuple_list:
d[a] +=b
print (d)
#defaultdict(<class 'int'>, {'a': 10, 'b': 20})
If you want to use your original method, you can use tuple unpacking:
def get_sum(l):
new_dict = {}
for x, y in l:
if x not in new_dict:
new_dict[x] = y
else:
new_dict[x] +=y
return new_dict
print (get_sum(tuple_list))
#{'a': 10, 'b': 20}
A very simple solution using the standard dict 'get' method:
d={}
for c,v in tuple_list:
d[c]=d.get(c,0)+v
Try this out:
def get_sum(tuple_list):
new_dict = {}
for tuple in tuple_list:
if tuple[0] not in new_dict:
new_dict[tuple[0]] = tuple[1]
else:
new_dict[tuple[0]] += tuple[1]
return new_dict
tuple_list = [('a',5), ('a',5), ('b',6), ('b',4), ('b',3), ('b',7)]
sum_dict = get_sum(tuple_list)
for key in sorted(sum_dict.keys()):
print("{}: {}".format(key, sum_dict[key]))
If the entry is not in your list, then you make the dictionary key, value pair be the first and second indexes of the tuple. Otherwise, the key is already in the dictionary, so we simply add to its current value.
Given a dictionary like so:
my_map = {'a': 1, 'b': 2}
How can one invert this map to get:
inv_map = {1: 'a', 2: 'b'}
Python 3+:
inv_map = {v: k for k, v in my_map.items()}
Python 2:
inv_map = {v: k for k, v in my_map.iteritems()}
Assuming that the values in the dict are unique:
Python 3:
dict((v, k) for k, v in my_map.items())
Python 2:
dict((v, k) for k, v in my_map.iteritems())
If the values in my_map aren't unique:
Python 3:
inv_map = {}
for k, v in my_map.items():
inv_map[v] = inv_map.get(v, []) + [k]
Python 2:
inv_map = {}
for k, v in my_map.iteritems():
inv_map[v] = inv_map.get(v, []) + [k]
To do this while preserving the type of your mapping (assuming that it is a dict or a dict subclass):
def inverse_mapping(f):
return f.__class__(map(reversed, f.items()))
Try this:
inv_map = dict(zip(my_map.values(), my_map.keys()))
(Note that the Python docs on dictionary views explicitly guarantee that .keys() and .values() have their elements in the same order, which allows the approach above to work.)
Alternatively:
inv_map = dict((my_map[k], k) for k in my_map)
or using python 3.0's dict comprehensions
inv_map = {my_map[k] : k for k in my_map}
Another, more functional, way:
my_map = { 'a': 1, 'b':2 }
dict(map(reversed, my_map.items()))
We can also reverse a dictionary with duplicate keys using defaultdict:
from collections import Counter, defaultdict
def invert_dict(d):
d_inv = defaultdict(list)
for k, v in d.items():
d_inv[v].append(k)
return d_inv
text = 'aaa bbb ccc ddd aaa bbb ccc aaa'
c = Counter(text.split()) # Counter({'aaa': 3, 'bbb': 2, 'ccc': 2, 'ddd': 1})
dict(invert_dict(c)) # {1: ['ddd'], 2: ['bbb', 'ccc'], 3: ['aaa']}
See here:
This technique is simpler and faster than an equivalent technique using dict.setdefault().
This expands upon the answer by Robert, applying to when the values in the dict aren't unique.
class ReversibleDict(dict):
# Ref: https://stackoverflow.com/a/13057382/
def reversed(self):
"""
Return a reversed dict, with common values in the original dict
grouped into a list in the returned dict.
Example:
>>> d = ReversibleDict({'a': 3, 'c': 2, 'b': 2, 'e': 3, 'd': 1, 'f': 2})
>>> d.reversed()
{1: ['d'], 2: ['c', 'b', 'f'], 3: ['a', 'e']}
"""
revdict = {}
for k, v in self.items():
revdict.setdefault(v, []).append(k)
return revdict
The implementation is limited in that you cannot use reversed twice and get the original back. It is not symmetric as such. It is tested with Python 2.6. Here is a use case of how I am using to print the resultant dict.
If you'd rather use a set than a list, and there could exist unordered applications for which this makes sense, instead of setdefault(v, []).append(k), use setdefault(v, set()).add(k).
Combination of list and dictionary comprehension. Can handle duplicate keys
{v:[i for i in d.keys() if d[i] == v ] for k,v in d.items()}
A case where the dictionary values is a set. Like:
some_dict = {"1":{"a","b","c"},
"2":{"d","e","f"},
"3":{"g","h","i"}}
The inverse would like:
some_dict = {vi: k for k, v in some_dict.items() for vi in v}
The output is like this:
{'c': '1',
'b': '1',
'a': '1',
'f': '2',
'd': '2',
'e': '2',
'g': '3',
'h': '3',
'i': '3'}
For instance, you have the following dictionary:
my_dict = {'a': 'fire', 'b': 'ice', 'c': 'fire', 'd': 'water'}
And you wanna get it in such an inverted form:
inverted_dict = {'fire': ['a', 'c'], 'ice': ['b'], 'water': ['d']}
First Solution. For inverting key-value pairs in your dictionary use a for-loop approach:
# Use this code to invert dictionaries that have non-unique values
inverted_dict = dict()
for key, value in my_dict.items():
inverted_dict.setdefault(value, list()).append(key)
Second Solution. Use a dictionary comprehension approach for inversion:
# Use this code to invert dictionaries that have unique values
inverted_dict = {value: key for key, value in my_dict.items()}
Third Solution. Use reverting the inversion approach (relies on the second solution):
# Use this code to invert dictionaries that have lists of values
my_dict = {value: key for key in inverted_dict for value in my_map[key]}
Lot of answers but didn't find anything clean in case we are talking about a dictionary with non-unique values.
A solution would be:
from collections import defaultdict
inv_map = defaultdict(list)
for k, v in my_map.items():
inv_map[v].append(k)
Example:
If initial dict my_map = {'c': 1, 'd': 5, 'a': 5, 'b': 10}
then, running the code above will give:
{5: ['a', 'd'], 1: ['c'], 10: ['b']}
I found that this version is more than 10% faster than the accepted version of a dictionary with 10000 keys.
d = {i: str(i) for i in range(10000)}
new_d = dict(zip(d.values(), d.keys()))
In addition to the other functions suggested above, if you like lambdas:
invert = lambda mydict: {v:k for k, v in mydict.items()}
Or, you could do it this way too:
invert = lambda mydict: dict( zip(mydict.values(), mydict.keys()) )
I think the best way to do this is to define a class. Here is an implementation of a "symmetric dictionary":
class SymDict:
def __init__(self):
self.aToB = {}
self.bToA = {}
def assocAB(self, a, b):
# Stores and returns a tuple (a,b) of overwritten bindings
currB = None
if a in self.aToB: currB = self.bToA[a]
currA = None
if b in self.bToA: currA = self.aToB[b]
self.aToB[a] = b
self.bToA[b] = a
return (currA, currB)
def lookupA(self, a):
if a in self.aToB:
return self.aToB[a]
return None
def lookupB(self, b):
if b in self.bToA:
return self.bToA[b]
return None
Deletion and iteration methods are easy enough to implement if they're needed.
This implementation is way more efficient than inverting an entire dictionary (which seems to be the most popular solution on this page). Not to mention, you can add or remove values from your SymDict as much as you want, and your inverse-dictionary will always stay valid -- this isn't true if you simply reverse the entire dictionary once.
If the values aren't unique, and you're a little hardcore:
inv_map = dict(
(v, [k for (k, xx) in filter(lambda (key, value): value == v, my_map.items())])
for v in set(my_map.values())
)
Especially for a large dict, note that this solution is far less efficient than the answer Python reverse / invert a mapping because it loops over items() multiple times.
This handles non-unique values and retains much of the look of the unique case.
inv_map = {v:[k for k in my_map if my_map[k] == v] for v in my_map.itervalues()}
For Python 3.x, replace itervalues with values.
I am aware that this question already has many good answers, but I wanted to share this very neat solution that also takes care of duplicate values:
def dict_reverser(d):
seen = set()
return {v: k for k, v in d.items() if v not in seen or seen.add(v)}
This relies on the fact that set.add always returns None in Python.
Here is another way to do it.
my_map = {'a': 1, 'b': 2}
inv_map= {}
for key in my_map.keys() :
val = my_map[key]
inv_map[val] = key
dict([(value, key) for key, value in d.items()])
Function is symmetric for values of type list; Tuples are coverted to lists when performing reverse_dict(reverse_dict(dictionary))
def reverse_dict(dictionary):
reverse_dict = {}
for key, value in dictionary.iteritems():
if not isinstance(value, (list, tuple)):
value = [value]
for val in value:
reverse_dict[val] = reverse_dict.get(val, [])
reverse_dict[val].append(key)
for key, value in reverse_dict.iteritems():
if len(value) == 1:
reverse_dict[key] = value[0]
return reverse_dict
Since dictionaries require one unique key within the dictionary unlike values, we have to append the reversed values into a list of sort to be included within the new specific keys.
def r_maping(dictionary):
List_z=[]
Map= {}
for z, x in dictionary.iteritems(): #iterate through the keys and values
Map.setdefault(x,List_z).append(z) #Setdefault is the same as dict[key]=default."The method returns the key value available in the dictionary and if given key is not available then it will return provided default value. Afterward, we will append into the default list our new values for the specific key.
return Map
Fast functional solution for non-bijective maps (values not unique):
from itertools import imap, groupby
def fst(s):
return s[0]
def snd(s):
return s[1]
def inverseDict(d):
"""
input d: a -> b
output : b -> set(a)
"""
return {
v : set(imap(fst, kv_iter))
for (v, kv_iter) in groupby(
sorted(d.iteritems(),
key=snd),
key=snd
)
}
In theory this should be faster than adding to the set (or appending to the list) one by one like in the imperative solution.
Unfortunately the values have to be sortable, the sorting is required by groupby.
Try this for python 2.7/3.x
inv_map={};
for i in my_map:
inv_map[my_map[i]]=i
print inv_map
def invertDictionary(d):
myDict = {}
for i in d:
value = d.get(i)
myDict.setdefault(value,[]).append(i)
return myDict
print invertDictionary({'a':1, 'b':2, 'c':3 , 'd' : 1})
This will provide output as : {1: ['a', 'd'], 2: ['b'], 3: ['c']}
A lambda solution for current python 3.x versions:
d1 = dict(alice='apples', bob='bananas')
d2 = dict(map(lambda key: (d1[key], key), d1.keys()))
print(d2)
Result:
{'apples': 'alice', 'bananas': 'bob'}
This solution does not check for duplicates.
Some remarks:
The lambda construct can access d1 from the outer scope, so we only
pass in the current key. It returns a tuple.
The dict() constructor accepts a list of tuples. It
also accepts the result of a map, so we can skip the conversion to a
list.
This solution has no explicit for loop. It also avoids using a list comprehension for those who are bad at math ;-)
Taking up the highly voted answer starting If the values in my_map aren't unique:, I had a problem where not only the values were not unique, but in addition, they were a list, with each item in the list consisting again of a list of three elements: a string value, a number, and another number.
Example:
mymap['key1'] gives you:
[('xyz', 1, 2),
('abc', 5, 4)]
I wanted to switch only the string value with the key, keeping the two number elements at the same place. You simply need another nested for loop then:
inv_map = {}
for k, v in my_map.items():
for x in v:
# with x[1:3] same as x[1], x[2]:
inv_map[x[0]] = inv_map.get(x[0], []) + [k, x[1:3]]
Example:
inv_map['abc'] now gives you:
[('key1', 1, 2),
('key1', 5, 4)]
This works even if you have non-unique values in the original dictionary.
def dict_invert(d):
'''
d: dict
Returns an inverted dictionary
'''
# Your code here
inv_d = {}
for k, v in d.items():
if v not in inv_d.keys():
inv_d[v] = [k]
else:
inv_d[v].append(k)
inv_d[v].sort()
print(f"{inv_d[v]} are the values")
return inv_d
I would do it that way in python 2.
inv_map = {my_map[x] : x for x in my_map}
Not something completely different, just a bit rewritten recipe from Cookbook. It's futhermore optimized by retaining setdefault method, instead of each time getting it through the instance:
def inverse(mapping):
'''
A function to inverse mapping, collecting keys with simillar values
in list. Careful to retain original type and to be fast.
>> d = dict(a=1, b=2, c=1, d=3, e=2, f=1, g=5, h=2)
>> inverse(d)
{1: ['f', 'c', 'a'], 2: ['h', 'b', 'e'], 3: ['d'], 5: ['g']}
'''
res = {}
setdef = res.setdefault
for key, value in mapping.items():
setdef(value, []).append(key)
return res if mapping.__class__==dict else mapping.__class__(res)
Designed to be run under CPython 3.x, for 2.x replace mapping.items() with mapping.iteritems()
On my machine runs a bit faster, than other examples here
I have a map and I am using a for loop to loop through it, but it only gives me the first value,.in ascending order. Any help appreciated!
What do you mean by ascending order? You could sort them:
Python 2.7
for v in sorted(map.itervalues()):
print v
Python 3
for v in sorted(map.values()):
print v
If instead you wanted keys to be sorted, try:
for _, v in sorted(map.items()):
print v
I'm assuming that by map you mean a dict, by "first value" you mean key, and by "second value" you mean value?
You can use .iteritems() to iterate over key/value pairs instead of just keys
d = {'a': 1, 'b': 2}
for k, v in d.iteritems():
print "key:", k
print "value:", v
Or .itervalues() to iterate over just the values:
for v in d.valueitems():
print "value:", v
There's no way to apply ordering to a dict's items directly -- iteration over a dict can occur in any order. You can however iterate over a sorted iteritems():
for k, v in sorted(d.iteritems(), key=lambda k, v: v):
print "key:", k
print "value:", v
Or just the values:
for v in sorted(d.valueitems()):
print "value:", v
It's not very clear what your asking, but I took my best guess. Next time try to post some of your already done code!
>>> mydict = {'a': 1, 'b': 89, 'c': 56, 'd': 9123, 'e':-23}
>>> mylist = []
>>> for k in mydict:
... mylist.append(mydict[k])
...
>>> mylist.sort()
>>> mylist.reverse()
>>> mylist
[9123, 89, 56, 1, -23]
>>>
Explanation:
Lines
Set mydict to some value of numbers (because you want it in reverse)
Set mylist to a blank list
Loop over the first value of the dict
Use the first value to get the second value with mydict[k].
Append that to mylist
Use mylist.sort() to sort in ascending order
Use mylist.reverse() to reverse it.
This question already has answers here:
Closed 10 years ago.
Possible Duplicate:
Inverse dictionary lookup - Python
Is there a built in way to index a dictionary by value in Python.
e.g. something like:
dict = {'fruit':'apple','colour':'blue','meat':'beef'}
print key where dict[key] == 'apple'
or:
dict = {'fruit':['apple', 'banana'], 'colour':'blue'}
print key where 'apple' in dict[key]
or do I have to manually loop it?
You could use a list comprehension:
my_dict = {'fruit':'apple','colour':'blue','meat':'beef'}
print [key for key, value in my_dict.items() if value == 'apple']
The code above is doing almost exactly what said you want:
print key where dict[key] == 'apple'
The list comprehension is going through all the key, value pairs given by your dictionary's items method, and making a new list of all the keys where the value is 'apple'.
As Niklas pointed out, this does not work when your values could potentially be lists. You have to be careful about just using in in this case since 'apple' in 'pineapple' == True. So, sticking with a list comprehension approach requires some type checking. So, you could use a helper function like:
def equals_or_in(target, value):
"""Returns True if the target string equals the value string or,
is in the value (if the value is not a string).
"""
if isinstance(target, str):
return target == value
else:
return target in value
Then, the list comprehension below would work:
my_dict = {'fruit':['apple', 'banana'], 'colour':'blue'}
print [key for key, value in my_dict.items() if equals_or_in('apple', value)]
You'll have to manually loop it, but if you'll need the lookup repeatedly this is a handy trick:
d1 = {'fruit':'apple','colour':'blue','meat':'beef'}
d1_rev = dict((v, k) for k, v in d1.items())
You can then use the reverse dictionary like this:
>>> d1_rev['blue']
'colour'
>>> d1_rev['beef']
'meat'
Your requirements are more complex than you realize:
You need to handle both list values and plain values
You don't actually need to get back a key, but a list of keys
You could solve this in two steps:
normalize the dict so that every value is a list (every plain value becomes a single-element)
build a reverse dictionary
The following functions will solve this:
from collections import defaultdict
def normalize(d):
return { k:(v if isinstance(v, list) else [v]) for k,v in d.items() }
def build_reverse_dict(d):
res = defaultdict(list)
for k,values in normalize(d).items():
for x in values:
res[x].append(k)
return dict(res)
To be used like this:
>>> build_reverse_dict({'fruit':'apple','colour':'blue','meat':'beef'})
{'blue': ['colour'], 'apple': ['fruit'], 'beef': ['meat']}
>>> build_reverse_dict({'fruit':['apple', 'banana'], 'colour':'blue'})
{'blue': ['colour'], 'apple': ['fruit'], 'banana': ['fruit']}
>>> build_reverse_dict({'a':'duplicate', 'b':['duplicate']})
{'duplicate': ['a', 'b']}
So you just build up the reverse dictionary once and then lookup by value and get back a list of keys.