I have an expression in regex, as follow:
r"(?:AND|OR|SUB|ADD)\([^()]*\)(?:\]\[|\[|)(|\s\[|\s)COIL\(Seq\[\d+]\.Bool\[\d+]\.\d+"
Usually I am using it to capturing from a sentence like that:
AND(Seq[1].Mat)AND(Type_G012.WithData)[COIL(Seq[1].Bool[93].11),XIC(Seq[1].exp)RES(Seq[1].ita)]
So I want to extract the last "AND" or "OR" or "SUB"... also with Seq[1].Bool[93].11.
After that I am doing an additional extraction. It was working with no problems with almost everything. The problem is that I have some patterns like that.
AND(Seq[1].Mat)AND(Type_G014.WithData)AND(Type_G015.WithData)[SET(Seq[1].WaitStep)COIL(Seq[1].Seq[93].10),AND(Seq[1].exp)RES(Seq[1].ita)]
Then I am not capturing the last AND, OR, SUB, etc. Because now I have the SET instruction in the middle of the AND and the COIL. So I want to exclude anything diferent of AND|OR|SUB|ADD Because I would like to extract from the last sentence as follow:
AND(Type_G015.WithData)[SET(Seq[1].Wait)COIL(Seq[1].Seq[93].10
Then is the last AND before the COIL. If something could help me I am testing several things and I am messing it.
Thanks.
To match both parts, you might use
(?:AND|OR|SUB|ADD)\([^()]+\)(?:\[SET\([^()]+\))?\[?COIL\(Seq\[\d+\]\.(?:Seq|Bool)\[\d+\]\.\d+
In parts
(?:AND|OR|SUB|ADD) Match 1 of the alternatives
\([^()]+\) Match from an opening till closing parenthesis
(?:\[SET\([^()]+\))? Optionally match [SET and from opening till closing parenthesis
\[?COIL\(Seq\[\d+\]\. Match Optional [ and COIL(Seq[ 1+ digits and ].
(?:Seq|Bool) Match either Seq or Bool
\[\d+\]\.\d+ Match [ 1+ digits and ]. followed by 1+ digits
Regex demo
Thanks.
Now I have something like that:
AND(Type_G015.WithData)[SET(Seq[1].Wait)COIL(Seq[1].Seq[93].10
How Can I extract just AND(Type_G015.WithData). Because my idea was as follow:
(?:AND|OR|SUB|ADD)\((.*)\) But now I am extracting until the last parenthesis but I would like to extract everythin but only until the first closing parenthesis, just:
AND(Type_G015.WithData)
Between parenthesis we could be whatever less more parenthesis.
Related
I am trying to grab fary_trigger_post in the code below using Regex. However, I don't understand why it always includes " in the end of the matched pattern, which I don't expect.
Any idea or suggestion?
re.match(
r'-instance[ "\']*(.+)[ "\']*$',
'-instance "fary_trigger_post" '.strip(),
flags=re.S).group(1)
'fary_trigger_post"'
Thank you.
The (.+) is greedy and grabs ANY character until the end of the input. If you modified your input to include characters after the final double quote (e.g. '-instance "fary_trigger_post" asdf') you would find the double quote and the remaining characters in the output (e.g. fary_trigger_post" asdf). Instead of .+ you should try [^"\']+ to capture all characters except the quotes. This should return what you expect.
re.match(r'-instance[ "\']*([^"\']+)[ "\'].*$', '-instance "fary_trigger_post" '.strip(), flags=re.S).group(1)
Also, note that I modified the end of the expression to use .* which will match any characters following the last quote.
Here's what I'd use in your matching string, but it's hard to provide a better answer without knowing all your cases:
r'-instance\s+"(.+)"\s*$'
When you try to get group 1 (i.e. (.+)) regex will follow this match to the end of string, as it can match . (any character) 1 or more times (but it will take maximum amount of times). I would suggest use the following pattern:
'-instance[ "\']*(.+)["\']+ *$'
This will require regex to match all spaces in the end and all quoutes separatelly, so that it won't be included into group 1
I have an input that is valid if it has this parts:
starts with letters(upper and lower), numbers and some of the following characters (!,#,#,$,?)
begins with = and contains only of numbers
begins with "<<" and may contain anything
example: !!Hel##lo!#=7<<vbnfhfg
what is the right regex expression in python to identify if the input is valid?
I am trying with
pattern= r"([a-zA-Z0-9|!|#|#|$|?]{2,})([=]{1})([0-9]{1})([<]{2})([a-zA-Z0-9]{1,})/+"
but apparently am wrong.
For testing regex I can really recommend regex101. Makes it much easier to understand what your regex is doing and what strings it matches.
Now, for your regex pattern and the example you provided you need to remove the /+ in the end. Then it matches your example string. However, it splits it into four capture groups and not into three as I understand you want to have from your list. To split it into four caputre groups you could use this:
"([a-zA-Z0-9!##$?]{2,})([=]{1}[0-9]+)(<<.*)"
This returns the capture groups:
!!Hel##lo!#
=7
<<vbnfhfg
Notice I simplified your last group a little bit, using a dot instead of the list of characters. A dot matches anything, so change that back to your approach in case you don't want to match special characters.
Here is a link to your regex in regex101: link.
In Python regex, how would I match only the facebook.com...777 substrings given either string? I don't want the ?sfnsn=mo at the end.
I have (?<=https://m\.)([^\s]+) to match everything after the https://m.. I also have (?=\?sfnsn) to match every thing in front of ?sfnsn.
How do I combine the regex to only return the facebook.com...777 part for either string.
have: https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=123456789&id=7777777777?sfnsn=mo
want: facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=123456789&id=7777777777
have: https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=123456789&id=7777777777
want: facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=123456789&id=7777777777
Here's what I was messing around with https://regex101.com/r/WYz5dn/2
(?<=https://m\.)([^\s]+)(?=\?sfnsn)
You could use a capturing group instead of a positive lookbehind and match either ?sfnsn or the end of the string.
https://m\.(\S*?)(?:\?sfnsn|$)
Regex demo
Using the lookarounds, the pattern could be:
(?<=https://m\.)\S*?(?=\?sfnsn|$)
Regex demo
Putting a ? at the end works, since the last grouped lookahead may or may not exist, we put a question mark after it:
(?<=https://m\.)([^\s]+)(?=\?sfnsn)?
I have regex code
https://regex101.com/r/o5gdDt/8
As you see this code
(?<!\S)(?<![\d,])(?:(?!(?:1[2-9]\d\d|20[01]\d|2020))\d{4,}[\u00BC-\u00BE\u2150-\u215E]?|\d{1,3}(?:,\d{3})+)(?![\d,])[\u00BC-\u00BE\u2150-\u215E]?(?!x)(?!/)
can capture all digits which sperated by 3 digits in text like
"here is 100,100"
"23,456"
"1,435"
all more than 4 digit number like without comma separated
2345
1234 " here is 123456"
also this kind of number
65,656½
65,656½,
23,123½
The only tiny issue here is if there is a comma(dot) after the first two types it can not capture those. for example, it can not capture
"here is 100,100,"
"23,456,"
"1,435,"
unfortunately, there is a few number intext which ends with comma...can someone gives me an idea of how to modify this to capture above also?
I have tried to do it and modified version is so:
(?<!\S)(?<![\d,])(?:(?!(?:1[2-9]\d\d|20[01]\d|2020))\d{4,}[\u00BC-\u00BE\u2150-\u215E]?|\d{1,3}(?:,\d{3})+)(?![\d])[\u00BC-\u00BE\u2150-\u215E]?(?!x)(?!/)
basically I delete comma in (?![\d,]) but it causes to another problem in my context
it captures part of a number that is part of equation like this :
4,310,747,475x2
57,349,565,416,398x.
see here:
https://regex101.com/r/o5gdDt/10
I know that is kind of special question I would be happy to know your ides
The main problem here is that (?![\d,]) fails any match followed with a digit or comma while you want to fail the match when it is followed with a digit or a comma plus a digit.
Replace (?![\d,]) with (?!,?\d).
Also, (?<!\S)(?<![\d,]) looks redundant, as (?<!\S) requires a whitespace or start of string and that is certainly not a digit or ,. Either use (?<!\S) or (?<!\d)(?<!\d,) depending on your requirements.
Join the negative lookaheads with OR: (?!x)(?!/) => (?!x|/) => (?![x/]).
You wnat to avoid matching years, but you just fail all numbers that start with them, so 2020222 won't get matched. Add (?!\d) to the lookahead, (?!(?:1[2-9]\d\d|20[01]\d|2020)(?!\d)).
So, the pattern might look like
(?<!\S)(?:(?!(?:1[2-9]\d\d|20[01]\d|2020)(?!\d))\d{4,}[\u00BC-\u00BE\u2150-\u215E]?|\d{1,3}(?:,\d{3})+)(?!,?\d)[\u00BC-\u00BE\u2150-\u215E]?(?![x/])
See the regex demo.
IMPORTANT: You have [\u00BC-\u00BE\u2150-\u215E]?(?![x/]) at the end, a negative lookahead after an optional pattern. Once the engine fails to find the match for x or /, it will backtrack and will most probably find a partial match. If you do not want to match 65,656 in 65,656½x, replace [\u00BC-\u00BE\u2150-\u215E]?(?![x/]) with (?![\u00BC-\u00BE\u2150-\u215E]?[x/])[\u00BC-\u00BE\u2150-\u215E]?.
See another regex demo.
It's the first time that I'm using regular expressions in Python and I just can't get it to work.
Here is what I want to achieve: I want to find all strings, where there is a word followed by a dot followed by another word. After that an unknown number of whitespaces followed by either (off) or (on). For example:
word1.word2 (off)
Here is what I have come up so far.
string_group = re.search(r'\w+\.\w+\s+[(\(on\))(\(off\))]', analyzed_string)
\w+ for the first word
\. for the dot
\w+ for the second word
\s+ for the whitespaces
[(\(on\))(\(off\))] for the (off) or (on)
I think that the last expression might not be doing what I need it to. With the implementation right now, the program does find the right place in the string, but the output of
string_group.group(0)
Is just
word1.word2 (
instead of the whole expression I'm looking for. Could you please give me a hint what I am doing wrong?
[ ... ] is used for character class, and will match any one character inside them unless you put a quantifier: [ ... ]+ for one or more time.
But simply adding that won't work...
\w+\.\w+\s+[(\(on\))(\(off\))]+
Will match garbage stuff like word1.word2 )(fno(nofn too, so you actually don't want to use a character class, because it'll match the characters in any order. What you can use is a capturing group, and a non-capturing group along with an OR operator |:
\w+\.\w+\s+(\((?:on|off)\))
(?:on|off) will match either on or off
Now, if you don't like the parentheses, to be caught too in the first group, you can change that to:
\w+\.\w+\s+\((on|off)\)
You've got your logical OR mixed up.
[(\(on\))(\(off\))]
should be
\((?:on|off)\)
[]s are just for matching single characters.
The square brackets are a character class, which matches any one of the characters in the brackets. You appear to be trying to use it to match one of the sub-regexes (\(one\)) and (\(two\)). The way to do that is with an alternation operation, the pipe symbol: (\(one\)|\(two\)).
I think your problem may be with the square brackets []
they indicate a set of single characters to match. So your expression would match a single instance of any of the following chars: "()ofn"
So for the string "word1.word2 (on)", you are matching only this part: "word1.word2 ("
Try using this one instead:
re.search(r'\w+\.\w+\s+\((on|off)\)', analyzed_string)
This match assumes that the () will be there, and looks for either "on" or "off" inside the parenthesis.